Internet Engineering Task Force | P. Fan |
Internet-Draft | China Mobile |
Intended status: Informational | M. Boucadair |
Expires: January 4, 2015 | France Telecom |
B. Williams | |
Akamai, Inc. | |
T. Reddy | |
C. Eckel | |
Cisco Systems, Inc. | |
July 3, 2014 |
Application Enabled Collaborative Networking Requirements
draft-conet-aeon-requirements-00
Identification and treatment of application flows are important to many application providers and network operators. Historically, this functionality has been implemented to the extent possible using heuristics, which inspect and infer flow characteristics. But many application flows in current usages are dynamic, adaptive, time-bound, encrypted, peer-to-peer, asymmetric, used on multipurpose devices, and have different priorities depending on direction of flow, user preferences, and other factors. Any combination of these properties renders heuristic based techniques less effective and may result in compromises to application security or user privacy. The document states requirements for a solution that enables identification and treatment of application flows without suffering the limitations that plague existing solutions.
This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79.
Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF). Note that other groups may also distribute working documents as Internet-Drafts. The list of current Internet-Drafts is at http://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/.
Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."
This Internet-Draft will expire on January 4, 2015.
Copyright (c) 2014 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the document authors. All rights reserved.
This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal Provisions Relating to IETF Documents (http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of publication of this document. Please review these documents carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect to this document. Code Components extracted from this document must include Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as described in the Simplified BSD License.
Identification and treatment of application flows are important to many application providers and network operators. The problems faced by existing solutions that try to provide such visibility and to enable appropriate treatment of application flows are described in detail in [I-D.conet-aeon-problem-statement].
As the IETF establishes default behaviors that thwart pervasive surveillance (e.g. [RFC7258]), it will be important to provide mechanisms for applications that want to have the network provide differential flow treatment for their data. The intent is to have applications protect the contents of their flows, yet have the ability to opt-in to information exchanges that provide a more precise allocation of network resources and thus better user experience. The document provide a complete set of requirements for such a solution.
The section clarifies the intended meaning of specific terms used within this document.
The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT", "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described in [RFC2119].
Rather than encourage independent, protocol specific solutions to this problem, this document advocates a protocol and application independent information model and individual data models that can be applied in a consistent fashion across a variety of protocols to enable explicit communication between applications and the networks on which they are used. The requirements are:
In designing a solution that meets these requirements, considerations should be made for existing deployments of heuristic based mechanisms. Such mechanisms are used in many networks and it is desirable that they continue to work as applications and networks nodes are incrementally enabled with functionality provided by this solution.
[I-D.conet-aeon-problem-statement] | Fan, P., Deng, H., Boucadair, M., Reddy, T. and C. Eckel, "Application Enabled Collaborative Networking: Problem Statement and Requirements", Internet-Draft draft-conet-aeon-problem-statement-00, May 2014. |
[RFC2119] | Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, March 1997. |
[RFC7258] | Farrell, S. and H. Tschofenig, "Pervasive Monitoring Is an Attack", BCP 188, RFC 7258, May 2014. |