NETMOD WG | I. Farrer |
Internet-Draft | Q. Sun |
Intended status: Informational | S. Zoric |
Expires: September 14, 2017 | Deutsche Telekom AG |
M. Abrahamsson | |
T-Systems | |
March 13, 2017 |
YANG Models Required for Managing Residential Gateway (RG) Devices
draft-faq-netmod-cpe-yang-profile-01
This document collects together the set of YANG models necessary for managing NETCONF-enabled Residential Gateway (RG) devices.
This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79.
Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF). Note that other groups may also distribute working documents as Internet-Drafts. The list of current Internet-Drafts is at http://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/.
Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."
This Internet-Draft will expire on September 14, 2017.
Copyright (c) 2017 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the document authors. All rights reserved.
This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal Provisions Relating to IETF Documents (http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of publication of this document. Please review these documents carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect to this document. Code Components extracted from this document must include Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as described in the Simplified BSD License.
This document defines the requirements and specifies the necessary YANG models for managing RG devices using NETCONF [RFC6241] and YANG [RFC6020]. Implementing NETCONF on RG devices, along with the relevant YANG models, provides operators with a flexible and extensible management interface.
Many of the YANG models referenced here are in various stages in the development process. In some cases there is currently no existing work. The aim of this document is to catalog which models are necessary, and for each referenced YANG model, provide information about the current status of the existing work. It is intended as a 'living document', which will be updated as the required / referenced YANG models progress. Once finalised, the goal of the document is to serve as a RG YANG 'Device profile' that can be used as a reference for operators and implementors who are adding YANG management capabilities to their devices.
The following requirements are necessary for basic RG hardware management.
Existing RFCs:
Work In Progress:
To Be Defined (and SDOs that might be responsible for the standards)
A RG has a number of network interfaces, usually including some of the following interface types: Ethernet LAN, Ethernet WAN, Ethernet 802.1q, Ethernet 802.1ag, and WLAN (802.11a/b/n/g/ac). [RFC7223] defines a YANG model for general interface management, which identifies these (and other) interface types.
NB - The list of interface types necessary for a complete, general HGW model needs to include xDSL (BBF) and DOCSIS (ITU) interfaces. These will be included in a future version of this document.
The following requirements are necessary for basic RG interface management functionality.
Existing RFCs:
Work In Progress:
To Be Defined (and SDOs that might be responsible for the standards)
The following requirements are necessary for the management and configuration of IPv4 and IPv6.
Existing RFCs:
Work In Progress:
To Be Defined:
The following requirements are necessary for routing management.
Existing RFCs:
Work In Progress:
To Be Defined:
The following requirements are necessary for management of the RG's NETCONF Server.
Existing RFCs:
Work In Progress:
To Be Defined:
The following requirements are necessary for management of DHCP, SLAAC and ND.
Existing RFCs:
Work In Progress:
To Be Defined:
The following requirements are necessary for NAT Management.
Existing RFCs:
Work In Progress:
To Be Defined:
The following requirements are necessary for management of IPv6 Transition Mechanisms.
Existing RFCs:
Work In Progress:
To Be Defined:
The following requirements are necessary for management of specific services which the RG may offer.
Existing RFCs:
Work In Progress:
To Be Defined:
The following requirements are necessary for management of security components.
Existing RFCs:
Work In Progress:
To Be Defined:
The following requirements are necessary to perform remote RG Software file transfer and software upgrades.
Existing RFCs:
Work In Progress:
To Be Defined:
A NETCONF/YANG managed RG should follow the Section 3.10 for enabling and managing IPv4/IPv6 firewalls. Security considerations from the related documents should be followed.
There are no IANA considerations for this document.
The authors would like to thank xxx for their contributions to this work.
[I-D.asechoud-netmod-diffserv-model] | Choudhary, A., Shah, S., Jethanandani, M., Liu, B. and N. Strahle, "YANG Model for Diffserv", Internet-Draft draft-asechoud-netmod-diffserv-model-03, June 2015. |
[I-D.han-netmod-intf-ext-ppp-yang] | Han, H., Gu, X., Lv, H. and J. Zhang, Yang Data Model for PPP Protocol", Internet-Draft draft-han-netmod-intf-ext-ppp-yang-02, February 2017. |
[I-D.ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-yang] | Cui, Y., Wang, H., Sun, L., Lemon, T., Farrer, I. and S. Zoric, "YANG Data Model for DHCPv6 Configuration", Internet-Draft draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-yang-03, June 2016. |
[I-D.ietf-isis-yang-isis-cfg] | Litkowski, S., Yeung, D., Lindem, A., Zhang, Z. and L. Lhotka, "YANG Data Model for IS-IS protocol", Internet-Draft draft-ietf-isis-yang-isis-cfg-15, February 2017. |
[I-D.ietf-netconf-call-home] | Watsen, K., "NETCONF Call Home and RESTCONF Call Home", Internet-Draft draft-ietf-netconf-call-home-17, December 2015. |
[I-D.ietf-netconf-netconf-client-server] | Watsen, K., Wu, G. and J. Schoenwaelder, "NETCONF Client and Server Models", Internet-Draft draft-ietf-netconf-netconf-client-server-01, November 2016. |
[I-D.ietf-netconf-server-model] | Watsen, K. and J. Schoenwaelder, "NETCONF Server and RESTCONF Server Configuration Models", Internet-Draft draft-ietf-netconf-server-model-09, March 2016. |
[I-D.ietf-netconf-zerotouch] | Watsen, K. and M. Abrahamsson, "Zero Touch Provisioning for NETCONF or RESTCONF based Management", Internet-Draft draft-ietf-netconf-zerotouch-12, January 2017. |
[I-D.ietf-netmod-acl-model] | Bogdanovic, D., Koushik, K., Huang, L. and D. Blair, "Network Access Control List (ACL) YANG Data Model", Internet-Draft draft-ietf-netmod-acl-model-10, March 2017. |
[I-D.ietf-netmod-intf-ext-yang] | Wilton, R., Ball, D., tsingh@juniper.net, t. and S. Sivaraj, "Common Interface Extension YANG Data Models", Internet-Draft draft-ietf-netmod-intf-ext-yang-04, March 2017. |
[I-D.ietf-netmod-sub-intf-vlan-model] | Wilton, R., Ball, D., tapsingh@cisco.com, t. and S. Sivaraj, "Sub-interface VLAN YANG Data Models", Internet-Draft draft-ietf-netmod-sub-intf-vlan-model-00, February 2017. |
[I-D.ietf-pim-igmp-mld-yang] | Liu, X., Guo, F., Sivakumar, M., McAllister, P. and A. Peter, "A YANG data model for Internet Group Management Protocol (IGMP) and Multicast Listener Discovery (MLD)", Internet-Draft draft-ietf-pim-igmp-mld-yang-03, March 2017. |
[I-D.ietf-pim-yang] | Liu, X., McAllister, P., Peter, A., Sivakumar, M., Liu, Y. and f. hu, "A YANG data model for Protocol-Independent Multicast (PIM)", Internet-Draft draft-ietf-pim-yang-07, March 2017. |
[I-D.ietf-softwire-dslite-yang] | Boucadair, M., Jacquenet, C. and S. Sivakumar, "A YANG Data Model for the DS-Lite", Internet-Draft draft-ietf-softwire-dslite-yang-02, January 2017. |
[I-D.ietf-softwire-yang] | Sun, Q., Wang, H., Cui, Y., Farrer, I., Zoric, S., Boucadair, M. and R. Asati, "A YANG Data Model for IPv4-in-IPv6 Softwires", Internet-Draft draft-ietf-softwire-yang-01, October 2016. |
[I-D.liu-dhc-dhcp-yang-model] | Liu, B., Lou, K. and C. Chen, "Yang Data Model for DHCP Protocol", Internet-Draft draft-liu-dhc-dhcp-yang-model-06, March 2017. |
[I-D.sf-netmod-file-transfer-yang] | Sun, Q. and I. Farrer, "A YANG Data Model for Transferring Files", Internet-Draft draft-sf-netmod-file-transfer-yang-00, March 2015. |
[I-D.sivakumar-yang-nat] | Sivakumar, S., Boucadair, M. and S. <>, "YANG Data Model for Network Address Translation (NAT)", Internet-Draft draft-sivakumar-yang-nat-05, September 2016. |
[IEEE-ETH-YANG] | IEEE 802.1q YANG Model" | , "
[RFC2119] | Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, DOI 10.17487/RFC2119, March 1997. |
[RFC6020] | Bjorklund, M., "YANG - A Data Modeling Language for the Network Configuration Protocol (NETCONF)", RFC 6020, DOI 10.17487/RFC6020, October 2010. |
[RFC6022] | Scott, M. and M. Bjorklund, "YANG Module for NETCONF Monitoring", RFC 6022, DOI 10.17487/RFC6022, October 2010. |
[RFC6241] | Enns, R., Bjorklund, M., Schoenwaelder, J. and A. Bierman, "Network Configuration Protocol (NETCONF)", RFC 6241, DOI 10.17487/RFC6241, June 2011. |
[RFC6470] | Bierman, A., "Network Configuration Protocol (NETCONF) Base Notifications", RFC 6470, DOI 10.17487/RFC6470, February 2012. |
[RFC7223] | Bjorklund, M., "A YANG Data Model for Interface Management", RFC 7223, DOI 10.17487/RFC7223, May 2014. |
[RFC7224] | Bjorklund, M., "IANA Interface Type YANG Module", RFC 7224, DOI 10.17487/RFC7224, May 2014. |
[RFC7277] | Bjorklund, M., "A YANG Data Model for IP Management", RFC 7277, DOI 10.17487/RFC7277, June 2014. |
[RFC7317] | Bierman, A. and M. Bjorklund, "A YANG Data Model for System Management", RFC 7317, DOI 10.17487/RFC7317, August 2014. |
[RFC7659] | Perreault, S., Tsou, T., Sivakumar, S. and T. Taylor, "Definitions of Managed Objects for Network Address Translators (NATs)", RFC 7659, DOI 10.17487/RFC7659, October 2015. |
[RFC8022] | Lhotka, L. and A. Lindem, "A YANG Data Model for Routing Management", RFC 8022, DOI 10.17487/RFC8022, November 2016. |
[RFC8071] | Watsen, K., "NETCONF Call Home and RESTCONF Call Home", RFC 8071, DOI 10.17487/RFC8071, February 2017. |