|
By submitting this Internet-Draft, each author represents that any applicable patent or other IPR claims of which he or she is aware have been or will be disclosed, and any of which he or she becomes aware will be disclosed, in accordance with Section 6 of BCP 79.
Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF), its areas, and its working groups. Note that other groups may also distribute working documents as Internet-Drafts.
Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference material or to cite them other than as “work in progress.”
The list of current Internet-Drafts can be accessed at http://www.ietf.org/ietf/1id-abstracts.txt.
The list of Internet-Draft Shadow Directories can be accessed at http://www.ietf.org/shadow.html.
This Internet-Draft will expire on September 29, 2008.
This document describes the "environment" extension to the Sieve email filtering language. The "environment" extension gives Sieve access to information about the environment where the Sieve interpreter is running.
Changed one place string result from "UA" to "MUA".
Updated the IANA registration template.
Moved the ihave extension to a separate document.
Added remote-host and remote-ip environment items to the initial set.
Updated references, completed IANA registration templates.
Added text recommending the use of a "name." prefix for groups of items with a common purpose. Also rearranged the text regarding the IANA registry so that the relevant information isn't more centralized.
Added test explaining how to test to see if an implementation knows about a particular environment item.
Added text to make it clear that remote-ip and remote-host can refer to LMTP and submsision clients as well as SMTP clients.
Changed evaluation-time to evaluation-agent, the former sounds too much like it is going to return a date/time value,
Rearranged and cleaned up the IANA considerations text, making it clearer what IANA's concerns are.
Clarified that the product version item is product-specific and should always be considered in the context of the product name item.
Added a note to the security considerations section about the possibile unreliability of remote-host information.
Defined the format of remote-ip more precisely as well as what happens when remote-host cannot be determined.
Split the evaluation-type item into separate location and phase items.
Sieve [RFC5228] (Guenther, P. and T. Showalter, “Sieve: An Email Filtering Language,” January 2008.) is a language for filtering email messages at or around the time of final delivery. It is designed to be implementable on either a mail client or mail server. It is suitable for running on a mail server where users may not be allowed to execute arbitrary programs, such as on black box Internet Message Access Protocol [RFC3501] (Crispin, M., “INTERNET MESSAGE ACCESS PROTOCOL - VERSION 4rev1,” March 2003.) servers, as it has no user-controlled loops or the ability to run external programs.
Although Sieve is intended to be independent of access protocol, mail architecture, and operating system, in some cases it is useful to allow scripts to access information about their execution context. The "environment" extension provides a new environment test that can be used to implement scripts that behave differently when moved from one system to another, when messages arrive from different remote sources or when otherwise operated in different contexts.
"The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT", "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described in [RFC2119] (Bradner, S., “Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate Requirement Levels,” March 1997.).
The terms used to describe the various components of the Sieve language are taken from [RFC5228] (Guenther, P. and T. Showalter, “Sieve: An Email Filtering Language,” January 2008.) section 1.1.
This document refers to the ABNF productions IPv4-address-literal, IPv6-address-literal, and General-address-literal defined in [RFC2821] (Klensin, J., “Simple Mail Transfer Protocol,” April 2001.) section 4.1.3.
The location item makes use of standard terms for email service components. Additional information and background on these terms can be found in [I‑D.crocker‑email‑arch] (Crocker, D., “Internet Mail Architecture,” February 2008.).
The capability string associated with the extension defined in this document is "environment".
Usage: environment [COMPARATOR] [MATCH-TYPE]
<name: string>
<key-list: string-list>
The environment test retrieves the item of environment information specified by the name string and matches it to the values specified in the key-list. The test succeeds if a match occurs. The type of match defaults to ":is" and the default comparator is "i;ascii-casemap".
The current message is not a direct source of information for the environment test; the item of information specified by the name string is extracted from the script's operating environment and key-list comes from the script.
The environment test MUST fail unconditionally if the specified information item does not exist. A script MUST NOT fail with an error if the item does not exist. This allows scripts to be written that handle nonexistent items gracefully. In particular, the test:
if environment :contains "item" "" { ... }
only succeeds if "item" is known to the implementation, and always succeeds if it is.
The "relational" extension [RFC5231] (Segmuller, W. and B. Leiba, “Sieve Email Filtering: Relational Extension,” January 2008.) adds a match type called ":count". The count of an environment test is 0 if the environment information returned is the empty string, or 1 otherwise.
Environment items can be standardized or vendor-defined. An IANA registry is defined for both types of items. Extensions designed for interoperable use SHOULD be defined in standards track or experimental RFCs.
The initial set of standardized environment items is as follows:
"domain" => The primary DNS domain associated with the Sieve
execution context, usually but not always a proper
suffix of the host name.
"host" => The fully-qualified domain name of the host where
the Sieve script is executing.
"location"
=> Sieve evaluation can be performed at various
different points as messages are processed. This item
provides additional information about the type of
service that is evaluating the script. Possible values
are "MTA", meaning the Sieve is being evaluated by a
Message Transfer Agent, "MDA", meaning evaluation is
being performed by a Mail Delivery Agent, "MUA",
meaning evaluation is being performed by a Mail User
Agent, and "MS", meaning evaluation is being performed
by a Message Store. Additional information and
background on these terms can be found in
[I-D.crocker-email-arch].
"name" => The product name associated with the Sieve interpreter.
"phase" => The point relative to final delivery where the
Sieve script is being evaluated. Possible values are
"pre", "during", and "post", referring respectively to
processing before, during, and after final delivery
has taken place.
"remote-host"
=> Host name of remote SMTP/LMTP/Submission client
expressed as a FQDN, if applicable and available. The
empty string will be returned if for some reason this
information cannot be obtained for the current client.
"remote-ip"
=> IP address of remote SMTP/LMTP/Submission client, if
applicable and available. IPv4, IPv6, and other types
of addresses are respectively represented in the
formats defined by the IPv4-address-literal,
IPv6-address-literal, and General-address-literal
productions defined in [RFC2821] section 4.1.3.
"version" => The product version associated with the Sieve
interpreter. The meaning of the product version string
is product-specific and should always be considered
in the context of the product name given by the
"name" item.
Implementations SHOULD support as many of the items on this initial list as possible. Additional standardized items can only be defined in standards-track or experimental RFCs.
Environment item names beginning with "vnd." represent vendor-defined extensions. Such extensions are not defined by Internet standards or RFCs, but are still registered with IANA in order to prevent conflicts.
A registry of environment items is provided by IANA. Item names may be registered on a first-come, first-served basis.
Groups of items defined in a standards track or experimenal RFC MAY choose to use a common name prefix of the form "name.", where "name" is a string that identifies the group of related items.
Items not defined in a standards track or experimental RFC MUST have a name that begins with the "vnd." prefix and this prefix is followed by the name of the vendor or product, such as "vnd.acme.rocket-sled-status".
The following template is to be used for registering new Sieve environment item names with IANA.
To: iana@iana.org
Subject: Registration of new Sieve environment item
Item name: [the string for use in the 'environment' test]
Description: [a brief description of the semantics of the
value the item returns]
RFC number: [for extensions published as RFCs]
Contact address: [email and/or physical address to contact for
additional information]
Multiple items and descriptions MAY be specified in a single registration request. Both standardized and vendor-defined items use this form.
The environment extension may be used to obtain information about the system the Sieve implementation is running on. This information in turn may reveal details about service provider or enterprise infrastructure.
An implementation can use any technique to determine the remote-host environment item defined in this specification, and the trustworthiness of the result will vary. One common method will be to perform a PTR DNS lookup on the client IP address. This information may come from an untrusted source. For example, the test:
if environment :matches "remote-host" "*.example.com" { ... }
is not a good way to test whether the message came from "outside" because anyone who can create a PTR record can create one that refers to whatever domain they choose.
All of the security considerations given in the base Sieve specification also apply to this extension.
The following template specifies the IANA registration of the Sieve extension specified in this document:
To: iana@iana.org
Subject: Registration of new Sieve extension
Capability name: environment
Description: The "environment" extension provides a new
environment test that can be used to implement
scripts that behave differently when moved
from one system to another or otherwise
operated in different contexts.
RFC number: RFC XXXX
Contact address: Sieve discussion list <ietf-mta-filters@imc.org>
This specification also defines a new IANA registry for Sieve environment item names. The specifics of this registry are given in Section 4.3 (IANA Registration of Environment Items). The initial contents of the registry are given in the following section.
The following template specifies the initial IANA registrations for the environment items defined in this document:
To: iana@iana.org
Subject: Registration of new Sieve environment items
Capability name: domain
Description: The primary DNS domain associated with the Sieve
execution context, usually but not always a
proper suffix of the host name.
Capability name: host
Description: The fully-qualified domain name of the host
where the Sieve script is executing.
Capability name: location
Description: Type of service executing the Sieve script.
Capability name: name
Description: The product name associated with the Sieve
interpreter.
Capability name: phase
Descrption: Point relative to final delivery at which the
Sieve script is being evaluated.
Capability name: remote-host
Description: Host name of remote SMTP client, if applicable
and available.
Capability name: remote-ip
Description: IP address of remote SMTP client, if applicable
and available.
Capability name: version
Description: The product version associated with the Sieve
interpreter.
RFC number: RFC XXXX
Contact address: Sieve discussion list <ietf-mta-filters@imc.org>
| [RFC2119] | Bradner, S., “Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate Requirement Levels,” BCP 14, RFC 2119, March 1997 (TXT, HTML, XML). |
| [RFC2821] | Klensin, J., “Simple Mail Transfer Protocol,” RFC 2821, April 2001 (TXT). |
| [RFC5228] | Guenther, P. and T. Showalter, “Sieve: An Email Filtering Language,” RFC 5228, January 2008 (TXT). |
| [RFC5231] | Segmuller, W. and B. Leiba, “Sieve Email Filtering: Relational Extension,” RFC 5231, January 2008 (TXT). |
| [I-D.crocker-email-arch] | Crocker, D., “Internet Mail Architecture,” draft-crocker-email-arch (work in progress), February 2008. |
| [RFC3501] | Crispin, M., “INTERNET MESSAGE ACCESS PROTOCOL - VERSION 4rev1,” RFC 3501, March 2003 (TXT). |
Brian Carpenter, Dave Crocker, Cyrus Daboo, Philip Guenther, Kjetil Torgrim Homme, John Klensin, Mark Mallett, Alexey Melnikov, and Dilyan Palauzo provided helpful suggestions and corrections.
| Ned Freed | |
| Sun Microsystems | |
| 3401 Centrelake Drive, Suite 410 | |
| Ontario, CA 92761-1205 | |
| USA | |
| Phone: | +1 909 457 4293 |
| Email: | ned.freed@mrochek.com |
Copyright © The IETF Trust (2008).
This document is subject to the rights, licenses and restrictions contained in BCP 78, and except as set forth therein, the authors retain all their rights.
This document and the information contained herein are provided on an “AS IS” basis and THE CONTRIBUTOR, THE ORGANIZATION HE/SHE REPRESENTS OR IS SPONSORED BY (IF ANY), THE INTERNET SOCIETY, THE IETF TRUST AND THE INTERNET ENGINEERING TASK FORCE DISCLAIM ALL WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO ANY WARRANTY THAT THE USE OF THE INFORMATION HEREIN WILL NOT INFRINGE ANY RIGHTS OR ANY IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.
The IETF takes no position regarding the validity or scope of any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights that might be claimed to pertain to the implementation or use of the technology described in this document or the extent to which any license under such rights might or might not be available; nor does it represent that it has made any independent effort to identify any such rights. Information on the procedures with respect to rights in RFC documents can be found in BCP 78 and BCP 79.
Copies of IPR disclosures made to the IETF Secretariat and any assurances of licenses to be made available, or the result of an attempt made to obtain a general license or permission for the use of such proprietary rights by implementers or users of this specification can be obtained from the IETF on-line IPR repository at http://www.ietf.org/ipr.
The IETF invites any interested party to bring to its attention any copyrights, patents or patent applications, or other proprietary rights that may cover technology that may be required to implement this standard. Please address the information to the IETF at ietf-ipr@ietf.org.