TOC |
|
[draft-fuxh-pce-boundary-explicit-control-framework-00] defines the framework for explicit control of region boundary in PCE-based inter-layer architecture. This document defines the PCEP extension for region boundaries explicit control.
The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT", "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described in RFC 2119 (Bradner, S., “Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate Requirement Levels,” March 1997.) [RFC2119].
This Internet-Draft is submitted to IETF in full conformance with the provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79.
Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF), its areas, and its working groups. Note that other groups may also distribute working documents as Internet-Drafts.
Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference material or to cite them other than as “work in progress.”
The list of current Internet-Drafts can be accessed at http://www.ietf.org/ietf/1id-abstracts.txt.
The list of Internet-Draft Shadow Directories can be accessed at http://www.ietf.org/shadow.html.
This Internet-Draft will expire on September 2, 2010.
Copyright (c) 2010 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the document authors. All rights reserved.
This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal Provisions Relating to IETF Documents (http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of publication of this document. Please review these documents carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect to this document. Code Components extracted from this document must include Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as described in the BSD License.
1.
Introduction
2.
ERBO (Explicit Region Boundary Object)
3.
RSVP-TE Extension
4.
Security Considerations
5.
IANA Considerations
6.
References
6.1.
Normative References
6.2.
Informative References
§
Authors' Addresses
TOC |
[draft-fuxh-pce-boundary-explicit-control-framework-00] defines the framework for explicit control of region boundary in PCE-based inter-layer architecture. There is a requirements for PCEP extensions to support explicit control of region boundary. A new object could be introduced in PCEP message.
TOC |
The format of ERBO object is the same as an ERO. The ERBO including the region boundaries information can be carried in PCEP message.
TOC |
The PCEP message is extended as followings:
<PCRep Message>::=<Common Header> <response-list> <response-list>::=<response>[<response-list>] <response>::=<RP> [<NO-PATH>] [<attribute-list>] [<path-list>] <path-list>::=<path>[<path-list>] <path>::= <ERO>[<ERBO>]<attribute-list> <attribute-list>::=[<LSPA>] [<BANDWIDTH>] [<metric-list>] [<IRO>] <metric-list>::=<METRIC>[<metric-list>]
TOC |
TBD
TOC |
TBD
TOC |
TOC |
[RFC2119] | Bradner, S., “Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate Requirement Levels,” BCP 14, RFC 2119, March 1997 (TXT, HTML, XML). |
[RFC3036] | Andersson, L., Doolan, P., Feldman, N., Fredette, A., and B. Thomas, “LDP Specification,” RFC 3036, January 2001 (TXT). |
[RFC5036] | Andersson, L., Minei, I., and B. Thomas, “LDP Specification,” RFC 5036, October 2007 (TXT). |
[RFC4447] | Martini, L., Rosen, E., El-Aawar, N., Smith, T., and G. Heron, “Pseudowire Setup and Maintenance Using the Label Distribution Protocol (LDP),” RFC 4447, April 2006 (TXT). |
[RFC5493] | Caviglia, D., Bramanti, D., Li, D., and D. McDysan, “Requirements for the Conversion between Permanent Connections and Switched Connections in a Generalized Multiprotocol Label Switching (GMPLS) Network,” RFC 5493, April 2009 (TXT). |
[RFC5654] | Niven-Jenkins, B., Brungard, D., Betts, M., Sprecher, N., and S. Ueno, “Requirements of an MPLS Transport Profile,” RFC 5654, September 2009 (TXT). |
TOC |
[I-D.ietf-ccamp-pc-spc-rsvpte-ext] | Caviglia, D., Ceccarelli, D., Li, D., and S. Bardalai, “RSVP-TE Signaling Extension For Management Plane To Control Plane LSP Handover In A GMPLS Enabled Transport Network.,” draft-ietf-ccamp-pc-spc-rsvpte-ext-07 (work in progress), February 2010 (TXT). |
[I-D.ietf-pwe3-ms-pw-arch] | Bocci, M. and S. Bryant, “An Architecture for Multi-Segment Pseudowire Emulation Edge-to-Edge,” draft-ietf-pwe3-ms-pw-arch-07 (work in progress), July 2009 (TXT). |
[I-D.abfb-mpls-tp-control-plane-framework] | Andersson, L., Berger, L., Fang, L., Bitar, N., Takacs, A., Vigoureux, M., and E. Bellagamba, “MPLS-TP Control Plane Framework,” draft-abfb-mpls-tp-control-plane-framework-02 (work in progress), February 2010 (TXT). |
[I-D.ietf-mpls-tp-framework] | Bocci, M., Bryant, S., Frost, D., Levrau, L., and L. Berger, “A Framework for MPLS in Transport Networks,” draft-ietf-mpls-tp-framework-10 (work in progress), February 2010 (TXT). |
TOC |
Xihua Fu | |
ZTE Corporation | |
West District,ZTE Plaza,No.10,Tangyan South Road,Gaoxin District | |
Xi An 710065 | |
P.R.China | |
Phone: | +8613798412242 |
Email: | fu.xihua@zte.com.cn |
URI: | http://wwwen.zte.com.cn/ |
Xuefeng Lin | |
ZTE Corporation | |
12F,ZTE Plaza,No.19,Huayuan East Road,Haidian District | |
Beijing 100191 | |
P.R.China | |
Phone: | +8615901011821 |
Email: | lin.xuefeng@zte.com.cn |
URI: | http://www.zte.com.cn/ |
Gang Xie | |
ZTE Corporation | |
12F,ZTE Plaza,No.19,Huayuan East Road,Haidian District | |
Beijing 100191 | |
P.R.China | |
Phone: | +8613691280432 |
Email: | xie.gang@zte.com.cn |