TOC |
|
This document describes an extension to civic location format and adds two new CAtypes: PN (pole number) and MP (milepost). Pole Numbers are used on poles such as lamp posts or utility poles, and can be used in some circumstances as location information. Mileposts are numeric values measured from an end of a trail, road, railway line or other feature.
This Internet-Draft is submitted to IETF in full conformance with the provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79.
Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF), its areas, and its working groups. Note that other groups may also distribute working documents as Internet-Drafts.
Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference material or to cite them other than as “work in progress.”
The list of current Internet-Drafts can be accessed at http://www.ietf.org/ietf/1id-abstracts.txt.
The list of Internet-Draft Shadow Directories can be accessed at http://www.ietf.org/shadow.html.
This Internet-Draft will expire on September 9, 2010.
Copyright (c) 2010 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the document authors. All rights reserved.
This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal Provisions Relating to IETF Documents (http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of publication of this document. Please review these documents carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect to this document. Code Components extracted from this document must include Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as described in the BSD License.
1.
Introduction
2.
Terminology Used in This Document
3.
Pole Number and Milepost
4.
Examples
5.
Security Considerations
6.
IANA Considerations
6.1.
CAtype Registry Update
7.
References
7.1.
Normative References
7.2.
Informative References
§
Authors' Addresses
TOC |
In some areas, utility and lamp posts carry a unique identifier, which we call a pole number in this document. In some countries, the label on the lamp post also carries the local emergency service number, such as "110", encouraging callers to use the pole number to identify their location.
_.-----,===. | | (''''') | | `---' | | | | ,---------, | | ,---, |Emergency| | | /|,-.|----->| Number | | | / |110| '---------' | | / |`-'| |_|/ | 2 | ,---------, | | | 1 | |Lamp Post| | | | 2 |----->| Number | |-| | 1 | '---------' | |\ | 0 | | | \ | 1 | | | \ | 4 | | | \|,,,| _ | | ``-..|.| ``--.._ `'--.._ Lamp post with emergency number.
On some roads, and many trails, railroad rights of way and other linear features, a post with a mile or kilometer distance from one end of the feature may be found (a "milepost"). There are other cases of poles or markers with numeric indications that are not the same as a "house number" or street address number.
In this document, we define an extension of the civic address format defined in [RFC4119] (Peterson, J., “A Presence-based GEOPRIV Location Object Format,” December 2005.) updated by [RFC5139] (Thomson, M. and J. Winterbottom, “Revised Civic Location Format for Presence Information Data Format Location Object (PIDF-LO),” February 2008.) to carry such pole number and milepost information.
TOC |
The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT", "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described in [RFC2119] (Bradner, S., “Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate Requirement Levels,” March 1997.).
TOC |
[RFC4776] (Schulzrinne, H., “Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol (DHCPv4 and DHCPv6) Option for Civic Addresses Configuration Information,” November 2006.) and [RFC5139] (Thomson, M. and J. Winterbottom, “Revised Civic Location Format for Presence Information Data Format Location Object (PIDF-LO),” February 2008.) provides a full set of parameters that may be used to describe a civic location.
This document describes two new CAtypes, PN (pole number), which is used to support post numbers, and MP (milepost), which is used to support mileposts. The pole number can consist of any combination of letters and digits. Punctuation characters and embedded spaces are ignored; lower and upper case letters are treated as equivalent. Mileposts are traditionally mile or kilometer distances from one end of the feature, but the field may contain any combination of letters, digits and punctuation characters. There could be country specific considerations for PN or MP use, but none are described in this document.
+---------+--------+-------------------------------+--------------+ | CAtype | PIDF | Description | Example | +---------+--------+-------------------------------+--------------+ | 43 | PN | lamp post number | A12101S | +---------+--------+-------------------------------+--------------+ | 44 | MP | Milepost | 102.4 | +---------+--------+-------------------------------+--------------+ Table 1: New Civic PIDF-LO Types
TOC |
<civicAddress xml:lang="en-AU" xmlns="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:pidf:geopriv10:civicAddr"> <country>CN</country> <A1>GD</A1> <A3>Shenzhen</A3> <A4>Bantian</A4> <RD>Wuhe</RD> <LMK>Bai Cao Yuan</LMK> <LOC>Front Gate</LOC> <NAM>Video Rental Store</NAM> <PC>518129</PC> <PN>2121014</PN> </civicAddress> <civicAddress xml:lang="en-AU" xmlns="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:pidf:geopriv10:civicAddr"> <country>US</country> <A1>PA</A1> <A3>Hopewell</A3> <RD>Baker Trail</RD> <MP>11.4</MP> </civicAddress>
TOC |
The security considerations of [RFC4119] is relevant to this document. No new security considerations arise as a result of these new fields
TOC |
TOC |
This document updates the CAtype registry established by [RFC4776]. Two entries are defined, with values as indicated in Table 1.
TOC |
TOC |
[RFC2119] | Bradner, S., “Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate Requirement Levels,” BCP 14, RFC 2119, March 1997 (TXT, HTML, XML). |
TOC |
[RFC3693] | Cuellar, J., Morris, J., Mulligan, D., Peterson, J., and J. Polk, “Geopriv Requirements,” RFC 3693, February 2004 (TXT). |
[RFC4119] | Peterson, J., “A Presence-based GEOPRIV Location Object Format,” RFC 4119, December 2005 (TXT). |
[RFC4776] | Schulzrinne, H., “Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol (DHCPv4 and DHCPv6) Option for Civic Addresses Configuration Information,” RFC 4776, November 2006 (TXT). |
[RFC5139] | Thomson, M. and J. Winterbottom, “Revised Civic Location Format for Presence Information Data Format Location Object (PIDF-LO),” RFC 5139, February 2008 (TXT). |
TOC |
Robins George | |
Huawei Technologies | |
Huawei Base, Bantian, Longgang District | |
Shenzhen, Guangdong 518129 | |
P. R. China | |
Phone: | +86-755-28788314 |
Email: | robinsg@huawei.com |
Qian Sun | |
Huawei Technologies | |
Huawei Base, Bantian, Longgang District | |
Shenzhen, Guangdong 518129 | |
P. R. China | |
Phone: | +86-755-28787351 |
Email: | sunqian@huawei.com |
Henning Schulzrinne | |
Columbia University | |
Department of Computer Science | |
450 Computer Science Building, New York NY, 10027 | |
US | |
Phone: | +1 212 939 7004 |
Email: | hgs@cs.columbia.edu |
URI: | http://www.cs.columbia.edu |
Brian Rosen | |
NeuStar, Inc. | |
470 Conrad Dr | |
Mars, PA 16046 | |
US | |
Email: | br@brianrosen.net |