Internet Engineering Task Force | E.H. Haleplidis |
Internet-Draft | University of Patras |
Intended status: Informational | J.H. Halpern |
Expires: April 10, 2013 | Ericsson |
October 09, 2012 |
ForCES Model Extension
draft-haleplidis-forces-packet-parallelization-00
Forwarding and Control Element Separation (ForCES) defines an architectural framework and associated protocols to standardize information exchange between the control plane and the forwarding plane in a ForCES Network Element (ForCES NE). RFC5812 has defined the ForCES Model provides a formal way to represent the capabilities, state, and configuration of forwarding elements within the context of the ForCES protocol, so that control elements (CEs) can control the FEs accordingly. More specifically, the model describes the logical functions that are present in an FE, what capabilities these functions support, and how these functions are or can be interconnected.
Many network devices support parallel packet processing. This document describes how ForCES can model a network device's parallelization datapath.
This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79.
Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF). Note that other groups may also distribute working documents as Internet-Drafts. The list of current Internet- Drafts is at http:/⁠/⁠datatracker.ietf.org/⁠drafts/⁠current/⁠.
Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."
This Internet-Draft will expire on April 10, 2013.
Copyright (c) 2012 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the document authors. All rights reserved.
This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal Provisions Relating to IETF Documents (http:/⁠/⁠trustee.ietf.org/⁠license-⁠info) in effect on the date of publication of this document. Please review these documents carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect to this document. Code Components extracted from this document must include Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as described in the Simplified BSD License.
The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT", "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described in [RFC2119].
This document follows the terminology defined by the ForCES Model in [RFC5812]. The required definitions are repeated below for clarity.
A lot of network devices can process packets in a parallel manner. The ForCES Model [RFC5812] presents a formal way to describe the Forwarding Plane's datapath with Logical Function Blocks (LFBs) using XML. This document describes how packet parallelization can be described with the ForCES model.
The modelling concept has been influenced by Cilc. Cilc is a programming language that has been developed since 1994 at the MIT Laboratory to allow programmers to identify elements that can be executed in parallel. The two Cilc concepts used in this document is spawn and sync. Spawn being the place where parallel work can start and sync being the place where the parallel work finishes and must collect all parallel output.
This document addresses the following two types of packet parallelization:
This document introduces two LFBs that are used in before and after the parallelization occurs:
Both parallel packet distribution types can currently be achieved with the ForCES model. The splitter LFB has one group output that produces either chunks or packets to be sent to LFBs for processing and the merger LFB has one group input that expects either packets or chunks to aggregate all the parallel packets or chunks and produce a single packet. Figure 1 shows an simple example of a split parallel datapath along with the splitter and merger LFB. Figure 2 shows an example of a flood parallel datapath along with the splitter and merger LFB. This modelling framework however allows for more complex parallel datapath topologies as can be seen in Figure 3 which shows one of the parallel paths to be further splitted into a new parallel section.
+-------+ +------>| LFB |-------+ +----------+ | +-------+ | +----------+ | |---+ +------>| | | | +-------+ | | --->| Splitter |---------->| LFB |-------------->| Merger |---> | LFB | +-------+ | LFB | | |---+ +------>| | +----------+ | +-------+ | +----------+ +------>| LFB |-------+ +-------+
Figure 1: Simple split parallel processing
+------------+ | Classifier | +---->| LFB |-----+ +----------+ | +------------+ | +----------+ | |----+ +---->| | | | +------------+ | | --->| Splitter | | Meter | | Merger |---> | LFB |--------->| LFB |---------->| LFB | | | +------------+ | | | |---+ +---->| | +----------+ | +------------+ | +----------+ +----->| IPv4 TTL |-----+ | Decrement | | LFB | +------------+
Figure 2: Simple flood parallel processing
+-------+ +-->| LFB |--+ +----------+ | +-------+ | +----------+ | |--+ +-->| | | | +-------+ | | +--->| Splitter |----->| LFB |----->| Merger |---+ | | LFB | +-------+ | LFB | | | | |--+ +-->| | | | +----------+ | +-------+ | +----------+ | | +-->| LFB |--+ | | +-------+ | | | +------------------------------+ | | | +-------+ | +------------+ +------>| LFB |--+ | +----------+ | +-------+ | +----------+ | |---+ +-->| | | | +-------+ | | --->| Splitter |---------->| LFB |-------------->| Merger |---> | LFB | +-------+ | LFB | | |---+ +------>| | +----------+ | +-------+ | +----------+ +------>| LFB |-------+ +-------+
Figure 3: Complex parallel processing
One important element to a developer is the ability to define which LFBs can be used in a parallel mode, with which other LFBs can they be parallelized with and the order of the LFBs can be assembled. This information must be accesible in the core LFBs and therefore this document needs to append one more capability in the FEObject LFB. The topology of the parallel datapath can be deferred and manipulated from the FEObject LFB's LFBTopology.
The FEObjectLFB must be able to specify for the LFB to be used in a parallel mode:
<!-- Datatype --> <dataTypeDef> <name>ParallelLFBType</name> <synopsis>Table entry for parallel LFBs</synopsis> <struct> <component componentID="1"> <name>LFBName</name> <synopsis>The name of an LFB Class</synopsis> <typeRef>string</typeRef> </component> <component componentID="2"> <name>LFBClassID</name> <synopsis>The id of the LFB Class</synopsis> <typeRef>uint32</typeRef> </component> <component componentID="3"> <name>LFBVersion</name> <synopsis>The version of the LFB Class used by this FE </synopsis> <typeRef>string</typeRef> </component> <component componentID="4"> <name>LFBParallelOccurenceLimit</name> <synopsis>The upper limit of instances of the same parallel LFBs of this class</synopsis> <optional /> <typeRef>uint32</typeRef> </component> <component componentID="5"> <name>AllowedParallelAfters</name> <synopsis>List of LFB Classes that this parallel LFB class can follow in a parallel pipeline</synopsis> <optional /> <array> <typeRef>uint32</typeRef> </array> </component> <component componentID="6"> <name>AllowedParallelBefores</name> <synopsis>List of LFB Classes that this LFB class can follow in a parallel pipeline</synopsis> <optional /> <array> <typeRef>uint32</typeRef> </array> </component> <component componentID="7"> <name>AllowedParallel</name> <synopsis>List of LFB Classes that this LFB class be run in parallel with</synopsis> <array> <typeRef>uint32</typeRef> </array> </component> </struct> </dataTypeDef> <!-- Capability --> <capability componentID="32"> <name>ParallelLFBs</name> <synopsis>List of all supported parallel LFBs</synopsis> <array type="Variable-size"> <typeRef>ParallelLFBType</typeRef> </array> </capability>
Figure 4: XML Definition for FEObjectLFB extension
While the ForCES model cannot describe how the splitting or the merging is actually done as that is an implementation issue of the actual LFB, however this document defines operational parameters to control the splitting and merging, namely the size of the chunks, what happens if a packet or chunk has been marked as invalid and whether the merge LFB should wait for all packets or chunks to arrive. Additionally this document defines metadata, which contain necessary information to assist the merging procedure. The following metadata are defined:
This metadata is produced from the Splitter LFB and is passed without being consumed by the LFBs in the parallel datapath. In case that in a parallel path there is an additional Splitter LFB therefore parallelizing even more that path, a new set of metadata MUST be produced for that specific path and the first set of metadata MUST be tunneled through without being consumed or changed until reaching the corresponding Merger LFB where it will be sent out again in the previous parallel path.
An LFB inside a parallel path decides that a packet or a chunk has to be dropped it MAY drop it but the metadata MUST be sent on the path to be received by the Merger LFB for merging purposes. Additional metadata produced by LFBs inside a datapath MAY be aggregated within the Merger LFB and sent on after the merging process.
One frame type has been defined in this library.
Frame Type Name | Synopsis |
---|---|
Chunk | A chunk is a frame that is part of an original larger frame |
No data types have been defined in this library.
The following metadata are defined in the OpenFlow type library:
Metadata Name | Type | ID | Synopsis |
---|---|---|---|
ParallelType | uchar | 32 | The type of parallelization this packet will go through. 0 for flood, 1 for split. |
ParallelID | uint32 | 33 | An identification number to specify that packets or chunks belong to the same parallel work. |
ParallelNum | uint32 | 34 | Defines the number of the specific packet or chunk of the specific parallel ID. |
ParallelPartsCount | uint32 | 35 | Defines the total number of packets or chunks for the specific parallel ID. |
Valid | boolean | 36 | Marks whether the chunk or a parallel processed packet as valid or not. |
A splitter LFB takes part in parallelizing the processing datapath by sending either the same packet or chunks of the same packet to multiple LFBs.
The splitter LFB receives any kind of packet via the singleton input, Input, along with the ParallelType metadata to identify how the packet will be treated. If the parallel type is of type flood, the same packet will be sent through all of the group output ParallelOut's instances. If the parallel type is of type split, the packet will be split into same size chunks, the size being defined by the ChunkSize component, and each chunk will be sent through one of the group output ParallelOut's instances. Each packet or chunk will be accompanied by the following metadata:
This LFB has only one component specified the ChunkSize, an uint32 that specifies the size of a chunk when a packet is split into multiple same size chunks.
This LFB has only one capability specified, the MinMaxChunkSize a struct of a uint32 to specify the minimum chunk size and a uint32 to specify the maximum chunk size.
This LFB has no events specified.
A merger LFB receives multiple packets or multiple chunks of the same packet and merge them into one merged packet.
The Merger LFB receives either a packet, a chunk via the group input ParallelIn, along with the ParallelType metadata to identify whether what was received was a packet or a chunk, the ParallelID, the ParallelNum the ParallelPartsCount and the Valid metadata. In case that an LFB has dropped a packet or a chunk within a parallale path only the metadata is received. If the MergeWaitType is set to false the Merger LFB will initiate the merge process. If false it will wait for all packet in the ParallelID to arrive. Before the merging process begins, the Merger LFB will check for the valid flags in each of the packets or chunks. If the InvalidAction Component has been set to 0 then if one packet or chunk is not valid all will dropped, else the process will initiate. Once the merging process has been finished the resulting packet will be sent via the singleton output port PacketOutput
This LFB has three components specified:
This LFB has no capabilities specified.
This LFB specifies only one event. It detects whether the invalidcounter has exceeded a specific value. The error report will send the invalid counter value.
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> <LFBLibrary xmlns="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:forces:lfbmodel:1.0" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://ietf.org/forces/1.0/lfbmodel" provides="Parallel"> <load library="BaseTypeLibrary" location="BaseTypeLibrary.LFB" /> <frameDefs> <frameDef> <name>Chunk</name> <synopsis>A chunk is a frame that is part of an original larger frame</synopsis> </frameDef> </frameDefs> <metadataDefs> <metadataDef> <name>ParallelType</name> <synopsis>The type of parallelization this packet will go through</synopsis> <metadataID>32</metadataID> <atomic> <baseType>uchar</baseType> <specialValues> <specialValue value="0"> <name>Flood</name> <synopsis>The packet should be sent as a whole to multiple recipients</synopsis> </specialValue> <specialValue value="1"> <name>Split</name> <synopsis>The packet should be split into multiple chunks and sent to recipients</synopsis> </specialValue> </specialValues> </atomic> </metadataDef> <metadataDef> <name>ParallelID</name> <synopsis>An identification number to specify that packets or chunks belong to the same parallel work.</synopsis> <metadataID>33</metadataID> <typeRef>uint32</typeRef> </metadataDef> <metadataDef> <name>ParallelNum</name> <synopsis>Defines the number of the specific packet or chunk of the specific parallel ID.</synopsis> <metadataID>34</metadataID> <typeRef>uint32</typeRef> </metadataDef> <metadataDef> <name>ParallelPartsCount</name> <synopsis>Defines the total number of packets or chunks for the specific parallel ID.</synopsis> <metadataID>35</metadataID> <typeRef>uint32</typeRef> </metadataDef> <metadataDef> <name>Valid</name> <synopsis>Marks whether the chunk or a parallel processed packet as valid or not.</synopsis> <metadataID>36</metadataID> <typeRef>boolean</typeRef> </metadataDef> </metadataDefs> <LFBClassDefs> <LFBClassDef LFBClassID="30"> <name>Splitter</name> <synopsis>A splitter LFB takes part in parallelizing the processing datapath. It will either send the same packet or chunks of one packet to multiple LFBs</synopsis> <version>1.0</version> <inputPorts> <inputPort> <name>Input</name> <synopsis>An input port expecting any kind of frame </synopsis> <expectation> <frameExpected> <ref>Arbitrary</ref> </frameExpected> <metadataExpected> <ref>ParallelType</ref> </metadataExpected> </expectation> </inputPort> </inputPorts> <outputPorts> <outputPort group="true"> <name>ParallelOut</name> <synopsis>An parallel output port that sends the same packet to all output instances or chunks of the same packet different chunk on each instance. </synopsis> <product> <frameProduced> <ref>Arbitrary</ref> <ref>Chunk</ref> </frameProduced> <metadataProduced> <ref>ParallelType</ref> <ref>ParallelID</ref> <ref>ParallelNum</ref> <ref>ParallelPartsCount</ref> <ref>Valid</ref> </metadataProduced> </product> </outputPort> </outputPorts> <components> <component componentID="1" access="read-write"> <name>ChunkSize</name> <synopsis>The size of a chunk when a packet is split into multiple same size chunks</synopsis> <typeRef>uint32</typeRef> </component> </components> <capabilities> <capability componentID="2"> <name>MinMaxChunkSize</name> <synopsis>The minimum and maximum size of a chunk capable of splitted by this LFB</synopsis> <struct> <component componentID="1"> <name>MinChunkSize</name> <synopsis>Minimum chunk size</synopsis> <optional /> <typeRef>uint32</typeRef> </component> <component componentID="2"> <name>MaxChunkSize</name> <synopsis>Maximum chunk size</synopsis> <typeRef>uint32</typeRef> </component> </struct> </capability> </capabilities> </LFBClassDef> <LFBClassDef LFBClassID="31"> <name>Merger</name> <synopsis>A merger LFB receives multiple packets or multiple chunks of the same packet and merge them into one merged packet</synopsis> <version>1.0</version> <inputPorts> <inputPort group="true"> <name>ParallelIn</name> <synopsis>An parallel input port that accepts packets or chunks from all output instances</synopsis> <expectation> <frameExpected> <ref>Arbitrary</ref> <ref>Chunk</ref> <ref>Null</ref> </frameExpected> <metadataExpected> <ref>ParallelType</ref> <ref>ParallelID</ref> <ref>ParallelNum</ref> <ref>ParallelPartsCount</ref> <ref>Valid</ref> </metadataExpected> </expectation> </inputPort> </inputPorts> <outputPorts> <outputPort> <name>PacketOutput</name> <synopsis>An output port expecting any kind of frame </synopsis> <product> <frameProduced> <ref>Arbitrary</ref> </frameProduced> </product> </outputPort> </outputPorts> <components> <component componentID="1" access="read-write"> <name>InvalidAction</name> <synopsis>What the Merge LFB will do if an invalid chunk or packet is received</synopsis> <atomic> <baseType>uchar</baseType> <specialValues> <specialValue value="0"> <name>DropAll</name> <synopsis>Drop all packets or chunks </synopsis> </specialValue> <specialValue value="1"> <name>Continue</name> <synopsis>Continue with the merge</synopsis> </specialValue> </specialValues> </atomic> </component> <component componentID="2"> <name>MergeWaitType</name> <synopsis>Whether the Merge LFB will wait for all packets or chunks to be received prior to sending out a response</synopsis> <typeRef>boolean</typeRef> </component> <component componentID="3"> <name>InvalidCounter</name> <synopsis>Counts the number of invalid merges </synopsis> <typeRef>uint32</typeRef> </component> </components> <events baseID="30"> <event eventID="1"> <name>ManyInvalids</name> <synopsis>An event that specifies if there are too many invalids</synopsis> <eventTarget> <eventField>InvalidCounter</eventField> </eventTarget> <eventGreaterThan>50</eventGreaterThan> <eventReports> <eventReport> <eventField>InvalidCounter</eventField> </eventReport> </eventReports> </event> </events> </components> </LFBClassDef> </LFBClassDefs> </LFBLibrary>
Figure 5: Parallel LFB library
The authors would like to thank Jamal Hadi Salim for discussions that made this document better.
This memo includes no request to IANA.
[RFC5810] | Doria, A., Hadi Salim, J., Haas, R., Khosravi, H., Wang, W., Dong, L., Gopal, R. and J. Halpern, "Forwarding and Control Element Separation (ForCES) Protocol Specification", RFC 5810, March 2010. |
[RFC5812] | Halpern, J. and J. Hadi Salim, "Forwarding and Control Element Separation (ForCES) Forwarding Element Model", RFC 5812, March 2010. |
[I-D.haleplidis-forces-openflow-lib] | Haleplidis, E, Cherkaoui, O, Hares, S and W Wang, "Forwarding and Control Element Separation (ForCES) OpenFlow Model Library", Internet-Draft draft-haleplidis-forces-openflow-lib-01, July 2012. |
[OpenFlowSpec1.1] | http://www.OpenFlow.org/, "The OpenFlow 1.1 Specification.", . |
[RFC2119] | Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, March 1997. |