I2RS working group | S. Hares |
Internet-Draft | Huawei |
Intended status: Informational | A. Dass |
Expires: September 30, 2017 | Ericsson |
March 29, 2017 |
RESTCONF Changes to Support I2RS Protocol
draft-hares-netconf-i2rs-restconf-02.txt
This document describes two RESTCONF optional capabilities (i2rs-control plane capability, ephemeral state capabilities) that are needed to support the I2RS protocol needs.
The purpose of this draft is to kick-start the discussions with I2RS Working Group and NETCONF WG on these two capabilities.
This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79.
Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF). Note that other groups may also distribute working documents as Internet-Drafts. The list of current Internet-Drafts is at http://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/.
Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."
This Internet-Draft will expire on September 30, 2017.
Copyright (c) 2017 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the document authors. All rights reserved.
This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal Provisions Relating to IETF Documents (http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of publication of this document. Please review these documents carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect to this document. Code Components extracted from this document must include Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as described in the Simplified BSD License.
This a proposal for the following two RESTCONF capabilities to augment RESTCONF [RFC8040] to support the first version of the I2RS protocol: Control plane datstore capability and ephemeral state capability. The yang that supports this proposal is described in [I-D.hares-netmod-i2rs-yang]. This work is based on the datastore definitions in [I-D.ietf-netmod-revised-datastores].
This draft parallels a similar proposal for NETCONF [RFC6241] is described in [I-D.hares-netconf-i2rs-protocol]. One difference between the proposed capabilities for i2rs control-plane capability additions to NETCONF and the proposed capabilities for i2rs control-plane for RESTCONF is write-collection. RESTCONF has edit-collision capability already which only needs a usage description.
The I2RS architecture [RFC7921] defines the I2RS interface "a programmatic interface for state transfer in and out of the Internet routing system". The I2RS protocol is a protocol designed to a higher level protocol comprised of a set of existing protocols which have been extended to work together to support a new interface to the routing system. The I2RS protocol is a "reuse" management protocol which creates new management protocols by reusing existing protocols and extending these protocols for new uses, and has been designed to be implemented in phases [RFC7921].
The structure of this document is:
This section reviews definitions from I2RS architecture, and provides background on I2RS work for the reader.
The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT", "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described in RFC 2119 [RFC2119].
The I2RS architecture [RFC7921] defines the following terms:
The requirements for the I2RS protocol are defined in the following documents:
The Interface to the routing System (I2RS) creates a new capability for the routing systems, and with greater capaiblities come a greater need for security. The requirements for a secure environment for I2RS is described in [I-D.ietf-i2rs-security-environment-reqs].
capability-name: i2rs-control-plane
The i2rs-control-plane datastore capability enables the RESTCONF to support the following dynamic control plane datastore.
Ability to provide read access for the configuration datstore
Ability to provide read access for other dynamic datastores
This protocol strawman utilizes the following existing proposed features for NETCONF and RESTCONF
none
All RESTCONF methods (OPTIONS, HEAD, GET, POST, PT, PATCH, DELETE) need to work in the control plane datastores. config=TRUE data, and where appropriate config=FALSE data.
capability-name: ephemeral-state
This capability defines the RESTCONF protocol extensions for control plane protocols that support control plane data stores with ephemeral data.
Ephemeral state is not unique to I2RS work.
The ephemeral capability is the ability to support a dynamic datastores which are entirely ephemeral or have ephemeral state modules, or ephemeral statements within objects in a modules. These objects can be configuration state (config=TRUE) or operational state (config=FALSE).
Ephemeral state in datastores, ephemeral modules or ephemeral objects within a module have one key characteristics: the data does not persist across reboots. The ephemeral configuration state must be restored by a client, and the operational state will need to be regenerated.
The entire requirements for ephemeral state for the I2RS control plane protocol are listed in [I-D.ietf-i2rs-ephemeral-state]. Compared to RESTCONF functionality there are 4 groups of additional changes:
The ephemeral capabilities have the following dependencies:
The ephemeral-datastore capability is identified by the following capability string: ephemeral (TBD URI)
none
RESTCONF must be able to support the ephemeral data in an an control-plane dynamic datastore. This is any API resource that is {+restconf}/datastore/<datastore-name>/data/ and operational state specific to the control plane datastore ({+restconf/cp-data/opstate}).
RESTCONF library functions must be able to store an indication that a data module has ephemeral state as meta-data.
RESTCONF operations of GET, POST, PUT, PATCH, and DELETE must be able to filter on meta-data with "ephemeral" flag. (Should this be only read).
The operations must support the following things about ephemeral.
TBD -
The security requirements for the I2RS protocol are covered in [I-D.ietf-i2rs-protocol-security-requirements]. The security environment the I2RS protocol is covered in [I-D.ietf-i2rs-security-environment-reqs]. Any person implementing or deploying the I2RS protocol should consider both security requirements.
TBD
[I-D.hares-netconf-i2rs-protocol] | Hares, S. and a. amit.dass@ericsson.com, "NETCONF Changes to Support I2RS Protocol", Internet-Draft draft-hares-netconf-i2rs-protocol-00, November 2016. |
[I-D.hares-netmod-i2rs-yang] | Hares, S. and a. amit.dass@ericsson.com, "Yang for I2RS Protocol", Internet-Draft draft-hares-netmod-i2rs-yang-04, March 2017. |
[I-D.ietf-i2rs-ephemeral-state] | Haas, J. and S. Hares, "I2RS Ephemeral State Requirements", Internet-Draft draft-ietf-i2rs-ephemeral-state-23, November 2016. |
[I-D.ietf-i2rs-protocol-security-requirements] | Hares, S., Migault, D. and J. Halpern, "I2RS Security Related Requirements", Internet-Draft draft-ietf-i2rs-protocol-security-requirements-17, September 2016. |
[I-D.ietf-i2rs-rib-data-model] | Wang, L., Ananthakrishnan, H., Chen, M., amit.dass@ericsson.com, a., Kini, S. and N. Bahadur, "A YANG Data Model for Routing Information Base (RIB)", Internet-Draft draft-ietf-i2rs-rib-data-model-07, January 2017. |
[I-D.ietf-i2rs-rib-info-model] | Bahadur, N., Kini, S. and J. Medved, "Routing Information Base Info Model", Internet-Draft draft-ietf-i2rs-rib-info-model-10, December 2016. |
[I-D.ietf-i2rs-security-environment-reqs] | Migault, D., Halpern, J. and S. Hares, "I2RS Environment Security Requirements", Internet-Draft draft-ietf-i2rs-security-environment-reqs-05, March 2017. |
[I-D.ietf-i2rs-yang-l3-topology] | Clemm, A., Medved, J., Varga, R., Liu, X., Ananthakrishnan, H. and N. Bahadur, "A YANG Data Model for Layer 3 Topologies", Internet-Draft draft-ietf-i2rs-yang-l3-topology-08, January 2017. |
[I-D.ietf-netconf-call-home] | Watsen, K., "NETCONF Call Home and RESTCONF Call Home", Internet-Draft draft-ietf-netconf-call-home-17, December 2015. |
[I-D.ietf-netconf-keystore] | Watsen, K., "Keystore Model", Internet-Draft draft-ietf-netconf-keystore-01, March 2017. |
[I-D.ietf-netconf-netconf-event-notifications] | Prieto, A., Clemm, A., Voit, E., Nilsen-Nygaard, E., Tripathy, A., Chisholm, S. and H. Trevino, "NETCONF Support for Event Notifications", Internet-Draft draft-ietf-netconf-netconf-event-notifications-01, October 2016. |
[I-D.ietf-netconf-restconf] | Bierman, A., Bjorklund, M. and K. Watsen, "RESTCONF Protocol", Internet-Draft draft-ietf-netconf-restconf-18, October 2016. |
[I-D.ietf-netconf-restconf-notif] | Voit, E., Prieto, A., Tripathy, A., Nilsen-Nygaard, E., Clemm, A. and A. Bierman, "Restconf and HTTP Transport for Event Notifications", Internet-Draft draft-ietf-netconf-restconf-notif-02, March 2017. |
[I-D.ietf-netconf-rfc5277bis] | Clemm, A., Prieto, A., Voit, E., Nilsen-Nygaard, E., Tripathy, A., Chisholm, S. and H. Trevino, "Subscribing to Event Notifications", Internet-Draft draft-ietf-netconf-rfc5277bis-01, October 2016. |
[I-D.ietf-netconf-tls-client-server] | Watsen, K. and G. Wu, "TLS Client and Server Models", Internet-Draft draft-ietf-netconf-tls-client-server-02, March 2017. |
[I-D.ietf-netconf-yang-patch] | Bierman, A., Bjorklund, M. and K. Watsen, "YANG Patch Media Type", Internet-Draft draft-ietf-netconf-yang-patch-14, November 2016. |
[I-D.ietf-netconf-yang-push] | Clemm, A., Voit, E., Prieto, A., Tripathy, A., Nilsen-Nygaard, E., Bierman, A. and B. Lengyel, "Subscribing to YANG datastore push updates", Internet-Draft draft-ietf-netconf-yang-push-05, March 2017. |
[I-D.ietf-netconf-zerotouch] | Watsen, K. and M. Abrahamsson, "Zero Touch Provisioning for NETCONF or RESTCONF based Management", Internet-Draft draft-ietf-netconf-zerotouch-13, March 2017. |
[I-D.ietf-netmod-revised-datastores] | Bjorklund, M., Schoenwaelder, J., Shafer, P., Watsen, K. and R. Wilton, "Network Management Datastore Architecture", Internet-Draft draft-ietf-netmod-revised-datastores-01, March 2017. |
[I-D.ietf-netmod-schema-mount] | Bjorklund, M. and L. Lhotka, "YANG Schema Mount", Internet-Draft draft-ietf-netmod-schema-mount-04, March 2017. |
[I-D.ietf-netmod-syslog-model] | Wildes, C. and K. Koushik, "A YANG Data Model for Syslog Configuration", Internet-Draft draft-ietf-netmod-syslog-model-14, March 2017. |