TOC |
|
This document describes the framework, messages, and procedures for the Diameter Network Address and Port Translation Control Application (DNCA), allowing for per-endpoint control of large scale NAT/NAPT devices, which are put in place to cope with IPv4-address space completion. The DNCA allows external devices to configure and manage a NAT device - expanding the existing Diameter-based AAA and policy control capabilities with a NAT/NAPT control component. These external devices can be network elements in the data plane such as a Network Access Server (NAS), or can be more centralized control plane devices such as AAA-servers. DNCA establishes a context to commonly identify and manage endpoints on a gateway or server, and a large scale NAPT/NAT device. This includes, for example, the control of the total number of NAT-bindings allowed or the allocation of a specific NAT-binding for a particular endpoint. In addition, it allows large scale NAT devices to provide information relevant to accounting purposes.
This Internet-Draft is submitted to IETF in full conformance with the provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79.
Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF), its areas, and its working groups. Note that other groups may also distribute working documents as Internet-Drafts.
Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference material or to cite them other than as “work in progress.”
The list of current Internet-Drafts can be accessed at http://www.ietf.org/ietf/1id-abstracts.txt.
The list of Internet-Draft Shadow Directories can be accessed at http://www.ietf.org/shadow.html.
This Internet-Draft will expire on September 9, 2010.
Copyright (c) 2010 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the document authors. All rights reserved.
This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal Provisions Relating to IETF Documents (http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of publication of this document. Please review these documents carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect to this document. Code Components extracted from this document must include Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as described in the BSD License.
1.
Introduction
2.
Conventions
3.
Deployment Framework
3.1.
Deployment Scenario
3.2.
Diameter NAPT Control Application Overview
3.3.
Deployment Scenarios For The Diameter NAPT Control Application
4.
Diameter NAT Control Application Session Establishment and Management
4.1.
Parties Involved
4.2.
Session Establishment
4.3.
Session Re-Authorization
4.4.
Session And Binding Query
4.5.
Session Termination
4.6.
DNCA Manager/Agent Failures
5.
Use Of The Diameter Base Protocol
5.1.
Securing Diameter Messages
5.2.
Accounting Functionality
5.3.
Use Of Sessions
5.4.
Routing Considerations
5.5.
Advertising Application Support
6.
Diameter NAT Control Application Commands
6.1.
NAT-Control Request (NCR) Command
6.2.
NAT-Control Answer (NCA) Command
7.
Diameter NAT Control Application AVPs
7.1.
Reused Base Protocol AVPs
7.2.
Additional Result-Code AVP Values
7.2.1.
Success
7.2.2.
Transient Failures
7.2.3.
Permanent Failures
7.3.
Reused NASREQ Diameter Application AVPs
7.4.
Reused from RFC 4675
7.5.
Reused from Diameter QoS Application
7.6.
Reused From ETSI ES 283 034, e4 Diameter Application
7.7.
Diameter NAT Control Application Defined AVPs
7.7.1.
NC-Request-Type AVP
7.7.2.
NAT-Control-Install AVP
7.7.3.
NAT-Control-Remove AVP
7.7.4.
NAT-Control-Definition AVP
7.7.5.
NAT-Internal-Address AVP
7.7.6.
NAT-External-Address AVP
7.7.7.
Max-NAT-Bindings
7.7.8.
NAT-Control-Binding-Rule AVP
7.7.9.
Duplicate-Session-Id AVP
8.
Accounting Commands
8.1.
NAT Control Accounting Messages
8.2.
NAT Control Accounting AVPs
8.2.1.
NAT-Control-Record
8.2.2.
NAT-Control-Binding-Status
8.2.3.
Current-NAT-Bindings
9.
AVP Occurrence Table
9.1.
DNCA AVP Table for NAT control initial and update requests
9.2.
DNCA AVP Table for Session Query request
9.3.
DNCA AVP Table for NAT Control Terminate requests
9.4.
DNCA AVP Table For Accounting Message
10.
IANA Considerations
10.1.
Command Codes
10.2.
AVP Codes
10.3.
AVP Values
10.3.1.
Result-Code AVP Values
10.4.
Application IDs
11.
Security Considerations
12.
Acknowledgements
13.
Change History (to be removed prior to publication as an RFC)
14.
References
14.1.
Normative References
14.2.
Informative References
§
Authors' Addresses
TOC |
Internet service providers have started to deploy Network Address Translators (NATs) and Network Address and Port Translators (NAPTs) at the edge of their networks to deal with the depletion of available public IPv4 addresses. This document defines a Diameter application for providers deploying such NATs and NAPT devices. The use of a Diameter application allows for simple integration into the existing AAA environment of a provider.
The Diameter NAPT Control Application (DNCA) offers the following capabilities:
This document is structured as follows: Section 2 lists terminology, while Section 3 provides an introduction to the Diameter NAPT Control Application and its overall deployment framework. Sections 4 to 8 cover the DNCA specifics, with Section 4 describing session management, Section 5 the use of the Diameter base protocol, Section 6 new commands, Section 7 the respective AVPs used, and Section 8 accounting aspects. Section 9 presents an AVP occurance table. IANA and security considerations are addressed in Sections 10 and 11.
TOC |
The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT", "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described in [RFC2119] (Bradner, S., “Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate Requirement Levels,” March 1997.).
Abbreviations are used in this document:
AAA: Authentication, Authorization, Accounting
DNCA: Diameter NAT Control Application
NAPT: Network Address and Port Translation
NAT: Network Address Translation (NAT and NAPT are used in this document interchangeably)
NAT-Binding or Binding: Association of two IP-address/port pairs (with one IP-address typically being private and the other one public) to facilitate NAT
NAS: Network Access Server
TOC |
TOC |
Figure 1 (Typical network deployment for internet access) shows a typical network deployment for internet access. A user’s IPv4-host gains access to the internet though a Network Access Server (NAS) which facilitates the authentication of the endpoint and configures the user’s connection according to the authorization and configuration data received from the AAA-server upon successful authentication. Public IPv4 addresses are used throughout the network.
+---------+ | | | AAA | | | +---------+ | | | | +---------+ +---------+ +----------+ | IPv4 | | | | IPv4 | | Host |----------| NAS |-------------| Internet | | | | | | | +---------+ +---------+ +----------+ <-------------------- Public IPv4 ---------------------->
Figure 1: Typical network deployment for internet access |
Figure 2 (Access network deployment with LSN) depicts the deployment scenario when a service provider introduces a NAT device to increase the efficiency of the global IPv4 address pool utilization. The objective is to provide the customer with connectivity to the public IPv4 Internet. The NAT device performs network address (and optionally protocol) translation, depending on whether the access network uses private IPv4 addresses or public IPv6 addresses, to public IPv4 addresses. If the NAT device would be put in place without any endpoint awareness, the service offerings of the service provider would be hampered. Provisioning static NAT-bindings for particular endpoints, using different public IP-address pools for different set of endpoints (e.g. residential or business customers), as well as reporting on the allocated bindings on a per-endpoint basis would be burdensome for a service provider if the NAT device would not be aware of endpoints and allow for per-endpoint control and management which easily integrates with the already existing per-endpoint management infrastructure of the service provider.
+---------+ | | | AAA | | | +---------+ | | | | +--------+ +---------+ +---------+ +----------+ | IPv4 | | | | | | IPv4 | | Host |----| NAS |----| NAT |----| Internet | | | | | | | | | +--------+ +---------+ +---------+ +----------+ <-------- Private IPv4 -----------><--- Public IPv4 ---> <-------- Public IPv6 -----------><--- Public IPv4 --->
Figure 2: Access network deployment with LSN |
TOC |
The Diameter NAT Control Application runs between a Diameter NAT Control Application Agent on the NAT and the Diameter NAT Control Application Manager. DNCA allows for per-endpoint control and management of a NAT. Being based on Diameter, DNCA integrates well with the suite of Diameter applications deployed for per-endpoint authentication, authorization, accounting, and policy control in service provider networks.
DNCA offers request and answer commands to control the allowed number of NAT-bindings per endpoint, to request the allocation of specific bindings for an endpoint, to define the address pool to be used for an endpoint, to provide per endpoint reporting on the allocated NAT-bindings, as well as to provide for unique identification of an endpoint on both NAT, AAA-server and NAS, thus simplifying the correlation of accounting data streams.
DNCA allows for controlling the behavior of a NAT device on a per-endpoint basis during initial session establishment as well as at later stages by providing an update procedure for already established sessions. Using DNCA, per-endpoint NAT-binding information can be retrieved either using accounting mechanisms or through an explicit session query to the NAT.
TOC |
Deployment dependent, the role of the Diameter NAT Control Manager can be fulfilled by either the NAS or by an external server such as an AAA-server. The two deployment scenarios are outlined in Figure 3 (LSN Control deployment: Integrated deployment) (“integrated deployment”) and Figure 4 (LSN Control deployment: Autonomous deployment) (“autonomous deployment”).
Within the figures (M) denotes the network element which takes on the DNCA manager role. Similarly, (A) identifies the network element which performs the DNCA agent role.
The integrated deployment approach hides the existence of the NAT device from external servers such as the AAA-server as much as possible. It is suited for environments where minimal changes to the existing AAA deployment are desired. The NAS, taking the role of the DNCA manager, is in charge of initiating and managing the session to the NAT device, exchanging NAT specific configuration information as well as handling reporting and accounting information. The NAS receives reporting and accounting information from NAT device. This way the NAS can provide for a single accounting record for the user, offloading external accounting systems from correlating accounting information received from multiple sources.
An example network attachment for an integrated NAT deployment could be described as follows: An endpoint connects to the network, with the NAS being the point of attachment. After successful authentication, NAS receives endpoint related authorization data from the AAA-server. A portion of the authorization data applies to per-endpoint configuration on the NAS itself, another portion describes authorization and configuration information for NAT control aimed at the NAT. NAS will initiate a DNCA session to the NAT and send the relevant authorization and configuration information for the particular endpoint to the NAT device. This could comprise e.g. NAT-bindings which have to be pre-established for the endpoint, or management related configuration, such as the maximum number of NAT-bindings allowed for the endpoint or accounting requirements. The NAT device will send its per-endpoint accounting information to the NAS which aggregates the accounting information received form the NAT with its local accounting information for the endpoint into a single accounting stream towards the AAA-server.
+---------+ | | | AAA | | | +---------+ | | | +--------+ +---------+ +---------+ +----------+ | IPv4 | | (M) | | (A) | | IPv4 | | Host |----| NAS |----| NAT |----| Internet | | | | | | | | | +--------+ +---------+ +---------+ +----------+ <-------- Public IPv6 ----------><--- Public IPv4 ----> <-------- Private IPv4 ----------><--- Public IPv4 ---->
Figure 3: LSN Control deployment: Integrated deployment |
The autonomous deployment approach decouples user management on NAS and NAT device. The AAA system performing the role of the DNCA manager manages the connection to the NAT device, controls the per-endpoint configuration, and also receives accounting and reporting information from the NAT device. Different from the integrated deployment scenario, the autonomous deployment scenario does not “hide” the existence of the NAT device from the AAA infrastructure. Here two accounting streams are received by the AAA-server for one particular endpoint, one from the NAS, and one from the NAT device.
+---------+ | (M) | | AAA | | | +---------+ | | | +--------+ +---------+ +---------+ +----------+ | IPv4 | | | | (A) | | IPv4 | | Host |----| NAS |----| NAT |----| Internet | | | | | | | | | +--------+ +---------+ +---------+ +----------+ <-------- Public IPv6 ----------><---- Public IPv4 ---> <-------- Private IPv4 ----------><---- Public IPv4 --->
Figure 4: LSN Control deployment: Autonomous deployment |
TOC |
Note that this section forward references some of the commands and AVPs defined for the DNCA. Please refer to Section 6 (Diameter NAT Control Application Commands) and Section 7 (Diameter NAT Control Application AVPs) for details.
TOC |
Authorization and control models supported by this application include the following parties:
The NAT control requesting entity is always the DNCA manager. Sessions will always be initiated, updated, or terminated by the DNCA manager. This mode of operation is sometimes also referred to as "push mode".
DNCA manager can be NAS or AAA Server. DNCA manager will initiate a session with DNCA agent when it learns about the subscriber. DNCA manager may learn about a subscriber when it receives authentication, authorization or accounting request for that subscriber or by some other means such as on the box configuration to identify subscriber w.r.t IP packets.
TOC |
The DNCA manager establishes a session to the DNCA agent to control the behavior of the NAT device. During session establishment, the DNCA manager will pass along configuration information to the DNCA agent. Session configuration information could for example comprise the maximum number of bindings allowed for the endpoint associated with this session, a set of pre-defined NAT-bindings to be established for this endpoint, or a description of the address pool, external addresses should be allocated from.
The DNCA manager initiates the Diameter NAT Control session to the DNCA agent. The DNCA manager generates a NAT-Control Request (NCR) message to the DNCA agent with NC-Request-Type AVP set to INITIAL_REQUEST. On receipt of the NCR the DNCA agent will setup a new session for the endpoint associated with the endpoint classifier(s) contained in the NCR. The DNCA agent notifies the DNCA manager about successful session setup using a NAT-Control Answer (NCA) message with Result-Code set to DIAMETER_SUCCESS. Figure 5 (Initial NAT Control request and session establishment ) shows the protocol interaction between the DNCA manager and the DNCA agent.
The initial NAT-Control-Request can contain configuration information for the session which specifies the behavior of the NAT for the session. Configuration information which can be included comprises:
In certain cases, the DNCA agent may not be able to perform the tasks requested within the NCR. These include the following:
DNCA Manager DNCA Agent | | | | | | Trigger | | | | NCR | |------------------------------------------>| | (INITIAL_REQUEST, endpoint classifier, | | session id, NAT control config data) | | | | | | Create session state | | | | | NCA | |<------------------------------------------| | (result code) | | | | |
Figure 5: Initial NAT Control request and session establishment |
TOC |
Session re-authorization is performed if the DNCA manager desires to change the behavior of the NAT for an existing session. Re-authorization could be used, for example, to change the number of allowed bindings for a particular session, or establish or remove a pre-defined binding.
The DNCA manager generates a NAT-Control Request (NCR) message to the DNCA agent with NC-Request-Type AVP set to UPDATE_REQUEST upon receiving a trigger signal. In case the session is updated successfully, the DNCA agent notifies the DNCA manager about successful session update using a NAT-Control Answer (NCA) message with Result-Code set to DIAMETER_SUCCESS. Figure 6 (NAT Control request for session update ) shows the protocol interaction between the DNCA manager and the DNCA agent.
In certain cases, the DNCA agent may not be able to perform the tasks requested within the NCR. These include the following:
DNCA Manager DNCA Agent | | | | | | Change of session | attributes | | | | NCR | |------------------------------------------>| | (UPDATE_REQUEST session id, | | NAT control config data) | | | | | | Update session state | | | | | NCA | |<------------------------------------------| | (result code) | | | | |
Figure 6: NAT Control request for session update |
TOC |
Session query can be used by the DNCA manager to either retrieve information on the current bindings for a particular session at the NAT or discover the session identifier for a particular external IP-address/port pair.
The DNCA manager initiates a session query by sending a NAT-Control Request (NCR) message to the DNCA agent with NC-Request-Type AVP set to QUERY_REQUEST. Figure 7 (Session Query) shows the protocol interaction between the DNCA manager and the DNCA agent.
Two types of query requests exist. The first type of query request uses the session ID as input parameter to the query. It is to allow the DNCA manager retrieve the current set of bindings for a specific session. The second type of query request is used in to retrieve the session identifiers, along with the associated bindings, matching a criteria. This enables the DNCA manager to find out which sessions utilize a specific external IP address.
DNCA Manager DNCA Agent | | | | | | DNCA Session Established | | | | NCR | |------------------------------------------>| | (QUERY_REQUEST) | | | | | | | | Look up corresponding session | and associated NAT Bindings | | | NCA | |<------------------------------------------| | (result code) | | | | |
Figure 7: Session Query |
TOC |
The DNCA manager generates a NAT-Control Request (NCR) message to the DNCA agent with NC-Request-Type AVP set to TERMINATE_REQUEST upon receiving a trigger signal. The DNCA agent sends accounting stop record reporting all the bindings and notifies the DNCA manager about successful session termination using a NAT-Control Answer (NCA) message with Result-Code set to DIAMETER_SUCCESS. Figure 8 (Terminate NAT Control session) shows the protocol interaction between the DNCA manager and the DNCA agent.
If a DNCA agent receives a NCR from a DNCA manager with NC-Request-Type AVP set to TERMINATE_REQUEST and fails to find a matching session, the DNCA agent returns DIAMETER_UNKNOWN_SESSION_ID error.
DNCA Manager DNCA Agent | | | | Trigger | | | | NCR | |------------------------------------------->| | (TERMINATE_REQUEST, session id) | | | | | | Remove NAT bindings | of session | | | | | Send accounting stop | |<-------------------------------------------| | for all session bindings | | | | Terminate Session / | Remove session state | | | | | | | NCA | |<-------------------------------------------| | (result code) | | |
Figure 8: Terminate NAT Control session |
TOC |
This document does not cover details in case DNCA manager and DNCA agent go out of sync, which could happen for example due to DNCA manager or DNCA agent restart, (temporary) loss of network connectivity etc. DNCA application will rely on DNCA Manager and DNCA Agent to have builtin redundancy support to recover state in case of failure.
Example failure cases include the following:
TOC |
The Diameter Base Protocol defined by [RFC3588] (Calhoun, P., Loughney, J., Guttman, E., Zorn, G., and J. Arkko, “Diameter Base Protocol,” September 2003.) shall apply, with the clarifications listed in the present specification.
TOC |
For secure transport of Diameter messages, IPSec MAY be used.
The DNCA agent MAY verify the identity of the DNCA Manager during the Capabilities Exchange Request procedure.
The DNCA agent MAY verify if the DNCA Manager that issues a NCR command is allowed to do so, based on:
TOC |
Accounting functionality (Accounting Session State Machine, related command codes and AVPs) is defined in Section 8 (Accounting Commands) below.
TOC |
Each DNCA session MUST have a globally unique Session-Id as defined in [RFC3588] (Calhoun, P., Loughney, J., Guttman, E., Zorn, G., and J. Arkko, “Diameter Base Protocol,” September 2003.), which MUST NOT be changed during the lifetime of a DNCA session. The Diameter Session-Id serves as the global endpoint identifier. The DNCA agent and DNCA manager maintain state associated with the Session-Id. This globally unique Session-Id is used for updating, accounting for and terminating the session. DNCA session MUST NOT have more than one outstanding request at any given instant. The DNCA agent sends an Abort-Session-Request as defined in [RFC3588] (Calhoun, P., Loughney, J., Guttman, E., Zorn, G., and J. Arkko, “Diameter Base Protocol,” September 2003.) if it is unable to maintain sessions due to resource limitation.
TOC |
It is assumed that the DNCA manager knows the DiameterIdentity of the DNCA agent for a given endpoint. Both the Destination-Realm and Destination-Host AVPs are present in the Request from the DNCA manager to the DNCA agent.
TOC |
Diameter applications conforming to this specification MUST advertise support by including the value of TBD in:
TOC |
The following commands are used to establish, maintain and clear NAT bindings.
TOC |
The NAT-Control Request (NCR) command, indicated by the command field set to TBD and the "R" bit set in the Command Flags field, is sent from the DNCA manager to the DNCA agent in order to install NAT bindings.
User-Name, Logical-Access-Id, Physical-Access-ID, Framed-IP-Address, Framed-IPv6-Prefix , Framed-Interface-Id, EGRESS-VLANID, NAS-Port-ID, Address-Realm, Calling-Station-ID AVPs serve as identifiers for the subscriber.
Message Format:
< NC-Request > ::= < Diameter Header: TBD, REQ, PXY> < Session-Id > { Auth-Application-Id } { Origin-Host } { Origin-Realm } { Destination-Realm } { Destination-Host } { NC-Request-Type } [ Origin-State-Id ] [ Auth-Session-State ] * [ NAT-Control-Remove ] * [ NAT-Control-Install ] [ User-Name ] [ Logical-Access-Id ] [ Physical-Access-ID ] [ Framed-IP-Address ] [ Framed-IPv6-Prefix ] [ Framed-Interface-Id ] [ EGRESS-VLANID] [ NAS-Port-ID] [ Address-Realm ] [ Calling-Station-ID ] * [ Proxy-Info ] * [ Route-Record ] * [ AVP ]
TOC |
The NAT-Control-Answer (NCA) command, indicated by the Command-Code field set to TBD and the "R" bit cleared in the Command Flags field, is sent by the DNCA agent in response to NAT-Control-Request command.
Message Format:
<NC-Answer> ::= < Diameter Header: TBD, PXY > < Session-Id > { Origin-Host } { Origin-Realm } { NC-Request-Type } [ Result-Code ] * [ NAT-Control-Definition ] [ Current-NAT-Bindings ] [ Origin-State-Id ] [ Error-Message ] [ Error-Reporting-Host ] * [ Failed-AVP ] * [ Proxy-Info ] [ Duplicate-Session-ID ] * [ Redirect-Host] [ Redirect-Host-Usage ] [ Redirect-Max-Cache-Time ] * [ Proxy-Info ] * [ Route-Record ] * [ Failed-AVP ] * [ AVP ] * [ AVP ]
TOC |
TOC |
AVPs reused from Diameter Base Protocol [RFC3588] (Calhoun, P., Loughney, J., Guttman, E., Zorn, G., and J. Arkko, “Diameter Base Protocol,” September 2003.) are listed below.
+-------------------+ | AVP Flag rules | +-----------------------------------------------|-----+---+---------+ | AVP | | | May | | Attribute Name Code Data Type |MUST |MAY| encrypt | +-----------------------------------------------+-----+---+---------+ |Acct-Interim-Interval 85 Unsigned32 | M | P | Y | |Auth-Application-Id 258 Unsigned32 | M | P | N | |Auth-Session-State 277 Enumerated | M | P | N | |Destination-Host 293 DiamIdent | M | P | N | |Destination-Realm 283 DiamIdent | M | P | N | |Error-Message 281 UTF8String | M | P | N | |Error-Reporting-Host 294 DiamIdent | M | P | N | |Failed-AVP 279 Grouped | M | P | N | |Origin-Host 264 DiamIdent | M | P | N | |Origin-Realm 296 DiamIdent | M | P | N | |Origin-State-Id 278 Unsigned32 | M | P | N | |Proxy-Info 284 Grouped | M | P | N | |Result-Code 268 Unsigned32 | M | P | N | |Route-Record 282 DiamIdent | M | | N | |Session-Id 263 UTF8String | M | P | Y | |User-Name 1 UTF8String | M | P | Y | +-----------------------------------------------+-----+---+---------+ |M - Mandatory bit. An AVP with "M" bit set and its value MUST be | | supported and recognized by a Diameter entity in order the | | message, which carries this AVP, to be accepted. | |P - Indicates the need for encryption for end-to-end security. | +-------------------------------------------------------------------+
Figure 9: DIAMETER AVPs used from Diameter base |
The Auth-Application-Id AVP (AVP Code 258) is assigned by IANA to Diameter applications. The value of the Auth-Application-Id for the Diameter NAT Control Application is TBD.
TOC |
This section defines new values for the Result-Code AVP which SHALL be supported by all Diameter implementations that conform to the present document.
TOC |
No new Result-Code AVP value is defined within this category.
TOC |
Result-Code AVP values that fall within the transient failures category are those used to inform a peer that the request could not be satisfied at the time that it was received. The request may be able to be satisfied in the future.
The following new values of the Result-Code AVP are defined:
RESOURCE_FAILURE (TBD)
The DNCA agent indicates that the binding could not be installed or a new session could not be created due to resource shortage.
TOC |
Result-Code AVP values that fall within the permanent failures category are used to inform the peer that the request failed, and should not be attempted again. The request may be able to be satisfied in the future.
The following new values of the Result-Code AVP are defined:
UNKNOWN_BINDING_RULE_NAME (TBD)
BINDING_FAILURE (TBD)The DNCA agent indicates that the binding could not be installed or a new session could not be created due to resource shortage.
The DNCA indicates that the requested binding(s) could not be installed.
MAXIMUM_BINDINGS_REACHED_FOR_ENDPOINT (TBD)
The DNCA agent denies the request because the maximum number of allowed bindings has been reached for the specified Endpoint Classifier.
SESSION_EXISTS (TBD)
The DNCA agent denies request to initialize a new session, if it already has a DNCA session that uses the same set of classifiers as indicated by DNCA manager in the new session init request.
INSUFFICIENT_CLASSIFIERS (TBD)
The DNCA agent defines request to initialize a new session, if the classifiers in the request match more than one of the existing sessions on DNCA agent.
TOC |
The following AVPs are reused from Diameter Network Access Server Application [RFC4005] (Calhoun, P., Zorn, G., Spence, D., and D. Mitton, “Diameter Network Access Server Application,” August 2005.).
+---------------------+ | AVP Flag rules | +------------------+------+------------|----+-----+----+-----|----+ | | AVP | | | |SHLD| MUST| | | Attribute Name | Code | Value Type|MUST| MAY | NOT| NOT|Encr| |------------------|------|------------|----+-----+----+-----|----| | NAS-Port | 5 | Unsigned32 | M | P | | V | Y | | NAS-Port-Id | 87 | UTF8String | M | P | | V | Y | | Calling-Station- | 31 | UTF8String | M | P | | V | Y | | Id | | | | | | | | | Framed-IP-Address| 8 | OctetString| M | P | | V | Y | | Framed-Interface-| 96 | Unsigned64 | M | P | | V | Y | | ID | | | | | | | | | Framed-IPv6- | 97 | OctetString| M | P | | V | Y | | Prefix | | | | | | | | +------------------+------+------------|----+-----+----+-----|----+
Figure 10: Reused NASREQ Diameter application AVPs |
TOC |
The following AVPs are reused from "RADIUS Attributes for Virtual LAN and Priority Support" specification [RFC4675] (Congdon, P., Sanchez, M., and B. Aboba, “RADIUS Attributes for Virtual LAN and Priority Support,” September 2006.).
+---------------------+ | AVP Flag rules | +------------------+------+------------|----+-----+----+-----|----+ | | AVP | | | |SHLD| MUST| | | Attribute Name | Code | Value Type|MUST| MAY | NOT| NOT|Encr| |------------------|------|------------|----+-----+----+-----|----| | Egress-VLANID | 56 | OctetString| M | P | | V | Y | +------------------+------+------------|----+-----+----+-----|----+
Figure 11: Reused attributes from RFC 4675 |
TOC |
The following AVPs are reused from the Diameter QoS Application [I‑D.ietf‑dime‑diameter‑qos] (Sun, D., McCann, P., Tschofenig, H., ZOU), T., Doria, A., and G. Zorn, “Diameter Quality of Service Application,” February 2010.).
+-------------------+ | AVP Flag rules | +-----------------------------------------------|-----+---+---------+ | AVP | | | May | | Attribute Name Code Data Type |MUST |MAY| encrypt | +-----------------------------------------------+-----+---+---------+ |Port TBD Integer32 | M | P | Y | |IP-Address-Mask TBD Grouped | M | P | Y | |Protocol TBD Enumerated | M | P | Y | |Direction TBD Enumerated | M | P | Y | +-----------------------------------------------+-----+---+---------+ |M - Mandatory bit. An AVP with "M" bit set and its value MUST be | | supported and recognized by a Diameter entity in order the | | message, which carries this AVP, to be accepted. | |P - Indicates the need for encryption for end-to-end security. | +-------------------------------------------------------------------+
Figure 12: Reused QoS-attributes |
TOC |
The following AVPs are reused from the Diameter e4 Application [ETSIES283034] (ETSI, “Telecommunications and Internet Converged Services and Protocols for Advanced Networks (TISPAN),Network Attachment Sub-System (NASS),e4 interface based on the Diameter protocol.,” September 2008.).
+-------------------+ | AVP Flag rules | +-----------------------------------------------|-----+---+---------+ | AVP | | | May | | Attribute Name Code Data Type |MUST |MAY| encrypt | +-----------------------------------------------+-----+---+---------+ |Address-Realm 301 OctetString | M,V | | Y | |Logical-Access-Id 302 OctetString | V | M | Y | |Physical-Access-ID 313 UTF8String | V | M | Y | +-----------------------------------------------+-----+---+---------+ |M - Mandatory bit. An AVP with "M" bit set and its value MUST be | | supported and recognized by a Diameter entity in order the | | message, which carries this AVP, to be accepted. | |P - Indicates the need for encryption for end-to-end security. | |V - Indicates whether the optional Vendor-ID field is present | | in the AVP header. Vendor-Id header of all AVPs in | | this table will be set to ETSI (13019) | +-------------------------------------------------------------------+
Figure 13: Reused AVPs from Diameter e4 application |
TOC |
The following table describes the new Diameter AVPs used in the present document, their AVP Code values, types, possible flag values and whether the AVP may or not be encrypted.
+-------------------+ | AVP Flag rules | +-----------------------------------------------|-----+---+---------+ | AVP Section | | | May | | Attribute Name Code Defined Data Type |MUST |MAY| encrypt | +-----------------------------------------------+-----+---+---------+ |NC-Request-Type TBD 7.7.1 Enumerated | M | P | Y | |NAT-Control-Install TBD 7.7.2 Grouped | M | P | Y | |NAT-Control-Remove TBD 7.7.3 Grouped | M | P | Y | |NAT-Control-Definition TBD 7.7.4 Grouped | M | P | Y | |NAT-Internal-Address TBD 7.7.5 Grouped | M | P | Y | |NAT-External-Address TBD 7.7.6 Grouped | M | P | Y | |Max-NAT-Bindings TBD 7.7.7 Unsigned32 | M | P | Y | |NAT-Control- TBD 7.7.8 OctetString| M | P | Y | | Binding-Rule | | | | |Duplicate- TBD 7.7.9 UTF8String | M | P | Y | | Session-ID | | | | |NAT-Control-Record TBD 8.2.1 Grouped | M | P | Y | |NAT-Control- TBD 8.2.2 Enumerated | M | P | Y | | Binding-Status | | | | |Current-NAT-Bindings TBD 8.2.3 Unsigned32 | M | P | Y | +-----------------------------------------------+-----+---+---------+ |M - Mandatory bit. An AVP with "M" bit set and its value MUST be | | supported and recognized by a Diameter entity in order the | | message, which carries this AVP, to be accepted. | |P - Indicates the need for encryption for end-to-end security. | |V - Vendor specific bit that indicates whether the optional | | Vendor-ID field is present in the AVP header | +-------------------------------------------------------------------+
Figure 14: New Diameter AVPs |
TOC |
The NC-Request-Type AVP (AVP Code TBD) is of type Enumerated and contains the reason for sending the NAT-Control-Request command. It shall be present in all NAT-Control-Request messages.
The following values are defined:
INITIAL_REQUEST (1)
UPDATE_REQUEST (2)An Initial Request is used to install binding at the DNCA agent on a successful access session setup.
An Update Request is used to update bindings previously installed on a given access session, to add new binding on a given access session, or to remove one or several binding(s) activated on a given access session.
TERMINATION_REQUEST (3)
Termination Request is used to deactivate and remove all bindings previously activated on a given access session.
QUERY_REQUEST (4)
Query Request is used to query the DNCA agent about the currently installed bindings for an endpoint classifier.
TOC |
The NAT-Control AVP (AVP code TBD) is of type Grouped, and it is used to activate or install NAT bindings. It also contains Max-NAT- Bindings that defines maximum number of NAT bindings to be allowed for a subscriber and NAT-Control-Binding-Rule that references predefined policy template on DNCA agent that may contain static bindings, maximum number of bindings to be allowed, address pool from which external binding address should be allocated.
AVP format:
NAT-Control-Install ::= < AVP Header: TBD > * [ NAT-Control-Definition ] [ NAT-Control-Binding-Rule ] [ Max-NAT-Bindings] * [ AVP ]
TOC |
The NAT-Control-Remove AVP (AVP code TBD) is of type Grouped, and it is used to deactivate or remove NAT bindings.
AVP format:
NAT-Control-Remove ::= < AVP Header: TBD > * [ NAT-Control-Definition ] [ NAT-Control-Binding-Rule ] * [ AVP ]
TOC |
The NAT-Control-Definition AVP (AVP code TBD) is of type Grouped, and it describes a binding.
The NAT-Control-Definition AVP uniquely identifies the binding between the DNCA agent and the DNCA manager.
If both the NAT-Internal-Address and NAT-External-Address AVP(s) are supplied, it is a pre-defined binding.
The Protocol AVP describes the transport protocol for which the binding is created. Exactly zero or one Protocol AVP may be contained within NAT-Control-Definition AVP. If the Protocol AVP is omitted and if both internal and external address are specified then the binding reserves the addresses for all transport protocols.
The Direction AVP is of type Enumerated and specifies in which direction to apply the binding. The values of the enumeration applicable in this context are: "IN","OUT". If Direction AVP is OUT or absent NAT-Internal-Address refers to the address of the subscriber device that needs to be translated. If Direction AVP is "IN" NAT-Internal-Address is the destination address that has to be translated.
AVP format:
NAT-Control-Definition ::= < AVP Header: TBD > { NAT-Internal-Address } [ Protocol ] [ Direction ] [ NAT-External-Address ] [ Session-Id ] * [ AVP ]
TOC |
The NAT-Internal-Address AVP (AVP code TBD) is of type Grouped, and it describes the internal IP address and port for a binding. Framed-IPV6-Prefix and Framed-IP-Address AVPs are mutually exclusive.
AVP format:
NAT-Internal-Address ::= < AVP Header: TBD > [ Framed-IP-Address ] [ Framed-IPv6-Prefix ] [ Port] * [ AVP ]
TOC |
The NAT-External-Address AVP (AVP code TBD) is of type Grouped, and it describes the external IP address and port for a binding. IP-Address-Mask AVP can only be specified when Framed-IP-Address AVP is present.
AVP format:
NAT-External-Address ::= < AVP Header: TBD > [ Framed-IP-Address ] [ IP-Address-Mask ] [ Port ] * [ AVP ]
TOC |
The Max-NAT-Bindings AVP (AVP code TBD) is of type Unsigned32, and it indicates the maximum number of NAT bindings allowed.
TOC |
The NAT-Control-Binding-Rule AVP (AVP code TBD) is of type is of type OctetString, and it defines a name for a policy template that will be predefined at NAT. Details on the contents and structure of the template as well as how it would be configured are outside the scope of this document. The policy to which this AVP refers to may contain NAT Bindings, address pool for external address allocation of NAT binding, maximum allowed NAT bindings etc.
TOC |
The Duplicate-Session-Id AVP (AVP Code TBD) is of is of type UTF8String. It is used to report error and contains the Session-Id of an existing session.
TOC |
The Diameter NAT Control Application reuses session based accounting as defined in Diameter Base Protocol [RFC3588] (Calhoun, P., Loughney, J., Guttman, E., Zorn, G., and J. Arkko, “Diameter Base Protocol,” September 2003.) to report the bindings used per endpoint. This reporting is achieved by sending Diameter Accounting Requests (ACR) [Start, Interim and Stop] from the DNCA agent to DNCA manager.
The DNCA agent sends an ACR Start on receiving an NCR with NC-Request-Type AVP set to INITIAL_REQUEST received for a session, or on creation of the first binding for a session requested in an earlier NCR. The DNCA may send ACR Interim updates, if required, either due to a change in bindings resulting from an NCR with NC-Request-Type AVP set to UPDATE_REQUEST, or periodically as specified in Acct-Interim-Interval by DNCA Manager or when it creates/tears down bindings. An ACR Stop is sent by the DNCA agent on receiving an NCR with NC-Request-Type AVP set to TERMINATION_REQUEST.
The function of correlating the multiple bindings used by an endpoint at any given time is relegated to the post processor.
The DNCA agent may trigger an interim accounting record when maximum number of bindings, if received in NCR, is reached.
TOC |
The ACR and ACA messages are reused as defined in Diameter Base Protocol [RFC3588] (Calhoun, P., Loughney, J., Guttman, E., Zorn, G., and J. Arkko, “Diameter Base Protocol,” September 2003.) for exchanging endpoint NAT binding details between the DNCA agent and the CDF. DNCA Application ID is used in the accounting commands. ACR will contain one or more optional NAT-Control-Record AVP to report the bindings. The DNCA agent indicates the number of the currently allocated NAT bindings to the DNCA manager using the Current-NAT-Bindings AVP. This number needs to match the number of bindings identified as active within the NAT-Control-Record AVP.
TOC |
In addition to AVPs for ACR specified in [RFC3588] (Calhoun, P., Loughney, J., Guttman, E., Zorn, G., and J. Arkko, “Diameter Base Protocol,” September 2003.), the DNCA agent must add the NAT-Control-Record AVP.
TOC |
The NAT-Control-Record AVP (AVP code TBD) is of type Grouped, and it describes a binding and its status. Event-Timestamp indicates the time at which binding was created if NAT-Control-Binding-Status is set to Created, or time at which the binding was removed if NAT-Control-Binding-Status is set to removed. If the NAT-Control-Binding-Status is active Event-Timestamp need not be present, if present it indicates that binding is active at the mentioned time.
NAT-Control-Record ::= < AVP Header: TBD > { NAT-Control-Definition } { NAT-Control-Binding-Status } [ Event-Timestamp ]
TOC |
The NAT-Control-Binding-Status AVP (AVP code TBD) is of type enumerated and it describes whether the binding being reported was created or removed or simply indicates that it is active.
The following values are defined:
Created (1)
Indicates that NAT binding is created.
Active (2)
Indicates that NAT binding is active.
Removed (3)
Indicates that the NAT binding was removed.
TOC |
The Current-NAT-Bindings AVP (AVP code TBD) is of type Unsigned32, and it indicates number of NAT bindings active on NAT.
TOC |
The following sections presents the AVPs defined in this document and specifies in which Diameter messages they MAY be present. Note that AVPs that can only be present within a Grouped AVP are not represented in this table.
The table uses the following symbols:
- 0
- The AVP MUST NOT be present in the message.
- 0+
- Zero or more instances of the AVP MAY be present in the message.
- 0-1
- Zero or one instance of the AVP MAY be present in the message. It is considered an error if there is more than one instance of the AVP.
- 1
- One instance of the AVP MUST be present in the message.
- 1+
- At least one instance of the AVP MUST be present in the message.
TOC |
The following table presents which NAT control application specific AVPs are to be present in NCR/NCA with NC-Request-Type set to INITIAL_REQUEST or UPDATE_REQUEST.
+-------------------+ | Command Code | +-----------------------------------+-------------------+ | Attribute Name NCR NCA | +-------------------------------------------------------+ |NC-Request-Type 1 1 | |NAT-Control-Install 0-1 0 | |NAT-Control-Remove 0-1 0 | |NAT-Control-Definition 0 0 | |NAT-Control-Record 0 0 | |Current-NAT-Bindings 0 0 | |Duplicate-Session-Id 0 0-1 | +-------------------------------------------------------+
TOC |
The following table presents which NAT control application specific AVPs are to be present in NCR/NCA with NC-Request-Type set to QUERY_REQUEST.
+-------------------+ | Command Code | +-----------------------------------+-------------------+ | Attribute Name NCR NCA | +-------------------------------------------------------+ |NC-Request-Type 1 1 | |NAT-Control-Install 0 0 | |NAT-Control-Remove 0 0 | |NAT-Control-Definition 0 0+ | |NAT-Control-Record 0 0 | |Current-NAT-Bindings 0 1 | |Duplicate-Session-Id 0 0 | +-------------------------------------------------------+
TOC |
The following table presents which NAT control application specific AVPs are to be present in NCR/NCA with NC-Request-Type set to TERMINATION_REQUEST.
+-------------------+ | Command Code | +-----------------------------------+-------------------+ | Attribute Name NCR NCA | +-------------------------------------------------------+ |NC-Request-Type 1 1 | |NAT-Control-Install 0 0 | |NAT-Control-Remove 0 0 | |NAT-Control-Definition 0 0 | |NAT-Control-Record 0 0 | |Current-NAT-Bindings 0 0 | |Duplicate-Session-Id 0 0 | +-------------------------------------------------------+
TOC |
Following table presents which NAT control application specific AVPs May or May Not be present in ACR/ACA messages.
+-------------------+ | Command Code | +-----------------------------------+-------------------+ | Attribute Name ACR ACA | +-------------------------------------------------------+ |NC-Request-Type 0 0 | |NAT-Control-Install 0 0 | |NAT-Control-Remove 0 0 | |NAT-Control-Definition 0 0 | |NAT-Control-Record 0+ 0 | |Current-NAT-Bindings 1 0 | |Duplicate-Session-Id 0 0 | +-------------------------------------------------------+
TOC |
This section contains the namespaces that have either been created in this specification or had their values assigned to existing namespaces managed by IANA.
TOC |
IANA is requested to allocate command code values for the following.
Registry:
Code Value | Name | Reference |
---|---|---|
to be assigned | NAT-Control-Request (NCR) | Section 6.1 (NAT-Control Request (NCR) Command) |
to be assigned | NAT-Control-Answer (NCA) | Section 6.2 (NAT-Control Answer (NCA) Command) |
Table 1: Command codes |
TOC |
IANA is requested to allocate AVP codes for the following AVPs that are defined in this document.
Registry:
Code Value | Name | Reference |
---|---|---|
to be assigned | NC-Request-Type | Section 7.7.1 (NC-Request-Type AVP) |
to be assigned | NAT-Control-Install | Section 7.7.2 (NAT-Control-Install AVP) |
to be assigned | NAT-Control-Remove | Section 7.7.3 (NAT-Control-Remove AVP) |
to be assigned | NAT-Control-Definition | Section 7.7.4 (NAT-Control-Definition AVP) |
to be assigned | NAT-Internal-Address | Section 7.7.5 (NAT-Internal-Address AVP) |
to be assigned | NAT-External-Address | Section 7.7.6 (NAT-External-Address AVP) |
to be assigned | Max-NAT-Bindings | Section 7.7.7 (Max-NAT-Bindings) |
to be assigned | NAT-Control-Binding-Rule | Section 7.7.8 (NAT-Control-Binding-Rule AVP) |
to be assigned | Duplicate-Session-Id | Section 7.7.9 (Duplicate-Session-Id AVP) |
to be assigned | NAT-Control-Record | Section 8.2.1 (NAT-Control-Record) |
to be assigned | NAT-Control-Binding-Status | Section 8.2.2 (NAT-Control-Binding-Status) |
to be assigned | Current-NAT-Bindings | Section 8.2.3 (Current-NAT-Bindings) |
Table 2: AVP codes |
TOC |
TOC |
Section 7.2 (Additional Result-Code AVP Values) defines several new values for the Result-Code AVP for transient failures and permanent failures. IANA is requested to allocate the corresponding values from the ranges for transient (4xxx) and permantent (5xxx) failures.
Code Value | Name | Reference |
---|---|---|
to be assigned (4xxx) | RESOURCE_FAILURE | Section 7.2.2 (Transient Failures) |
to be assigned (5xxx) | UNKNOWN_BINDING_RULE_NAME | Section 7.2.3 (Permanent Failures ) |
to be assigned (5xxx) | BINDING_FAILURE | Section 7.2.3 (Permanent Failures ) |
to be assigned (5xxx) | MAXIMUM_BINDINGS_REACHED_FOR_ENDPOINT | Section 7.2.3 (Permanent Failures ) |
to be assigned (5xxx) | SESSION_EXISTS | Section 7.2.3 (Permanent Failures ) |
to be assigned (5xxx) | INSUFFICIENT_CLASSIFIERS | Section 7.2.3 (Permanent Failures ) |
Table 3: Result Code AVP Values |
TOC |
IANA is requested to allocate the following application ID using the next value from the 7-16777215 range.
Registry:
ID Value | Name | Reference |
---|---|---|
to be assigned | Diameter NAT Control Application | Section 4 (Diameter NAT Control Application Session Establishment and Management) |
Table 4: Diameter Application ID values |
TOC |
Similar to what the Diameter QoS application (see [I‑D.ietf‑dime‑diameter‑qos] (Sun, D., McCann, P., Tschofenig, H., ZOU), T., Doria, A., and G. Zorn, “Diameter Quality of Service Application,” February 2010.)) does for authorization of QoS reservations, this document describes procedures for authorizing network address translation related attributes and parameters by an entity which is non-local to the device performing network address translation. The security considerations for the Diameter QoS application (see [I‑D.ietf‑dime‑diameter‑qos] (Sun, D., McCann, P., Tschofenig, H., ZOU), T., Doria, A., and G. Zorn, “Diameter Quality of Service Application,” February 2010.) section 11) apply in a similar way to the DNCA. Securing the information exchange between the authorizing entity (the DNCA manager) as well as the NAT device requires bilateral authentication of the involved parties, authorization of the involved parties to perform the required procedures and functions, as well as procedures to ensure integrity and confidentiality of the information exchange. DNCA makes use of the capabilities offered by Diameter as well as the underlying transport protocols to deliver on these requirements (see Section 5.1 (Securing Diameter Messages ) ).
It is assumed that the DNCA agent and DNCA manager are in the same domain and have a mutual trust set up. Authorization between the DNCA agent and DNCA manager is beyond the scope of this document.
TOC |
The authors would like to thank Jouni Korhonen, Avi Lior, Chris Metz, Hannes Tschofenig, Greg Weber, and Glen Zorn for their input on this document.
TOC |
Changes from -00 to -01
- a.
- new values for Result-Code AVP used - instead of Experimental-Result AVP
- b.
- added support for transport specific binding (UDP/TCP)
- c.
- added support for twice-NAT
- d.
- clarified the use of the two different types of query-requests
Changes from -01 to -02
- a.
- Reference to pull mode removed, session initiation event clarified in section 4.1
- b.
- added Redirect-* AVPs in NCA command
- c.
- Removed reference to Called-Station-Id AVP in NCR command
- d.
- Editorial changes (shorted intro section
- e.
- added support for bindings providing AFT (NAT64)
TOC |
TOC |
[ETSIES283034] | ETSI, “Telecommunications and Internet Converged Services and Protocols for Advanced Networks (TISPAN),Network Attachment Sub-System (NASS),e4 interface based on the Diameter protocol.,” September 2008. |
[RFC2119] | Bradner, S., “Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate Requirement Levels,” BCP 14, RFC 2119, March 1997 (TXT, HTML, XML). |
[RFC3588] | Calhoun, P., Loughney, J., Guttman, E., Zorn, G., and J. Arkko, “Diameter Base Protocol,” RFC 3588, September 2003 (TXT). |
[RFC4675] | Congdon, P., Sanchez, M., and B. Aboba, “RADIUS Attributes for Virtual LAN and Priority Support,” RFC 4675, September 2006 (TXT). |
[RFC5777] | Korhonen, J., Tschofenig, H., Arumaithurai, M., Jones, M., and A. Lior, “Traffic Classification and Quality of Service (QoS) Attributes for Diameter,” RFC 5777, February 2010 (TXT). |
TOC |
[I-D.ietf-dime-diameter-qos] | Sun, D., McCann, P., Tschofenig, H., ZOU), T., Doria, A., and G. Zorn, “Diameter Quality of Service Application,” draft-ietf-dime-diameter-qos-14 (work in progress), February 2010 (TXT). |
[I-D.narten-iana-considerations-rfc2434bis] | Narten, T. and H. Alvestrand, “Guidelines for Writing an IANA Considerations Section in RFCs,” draft-narten-iana-considerations-rfc2434bis-09 (work in progress), March 2008 (TXT). |
[I-D.nishitani-cgn] | Nishitani, T., Yamagata, I., Miyakawa, S., Nakagawa, A., and H. Ashida, “Common Functions of Large Scale NAT (LSN),” draft-nishitani-cgn-03 (work in progress), November 2009 (TXT). |
[RFC4005] | Calhoun, P., Zorn, G., Spence, D., and D. Mitton, “Diameter Network Access Server Application,” RFC 4005, August 2005 (TXT). |
[RFC5624] | Korhonen, J., Tschofenig, H., and E. Davies, “Quality of Service Parameters for Usage with Diameter,” RFC 5624, August 2009 (TXT). |
[TS32299] | “3rd Generation Partnership Project; Technical Specification Group Service and System Aspects; Telecommunication management; Charging management; "Diameter charging applications", 3GPP TS 32.299 Version 6.3.0.2,” 2008. |
TOC |
Frank Brockners | |
Cisco | |
Hansaallee 249, 3rd Floor | |
DUESSELDORF, NORDRHEIN-WESTFALEN 40549 | |
Germany | |
Email: | fbrockne@cisco.com |
Shwetha Bhandari | |
Cisco | |
Cessna Business Park, Sarjapura Marathalli Outer Ring Road | |
Bangalore, KARNATAKA 560 087 | |
India | |
Email: | shwethab@cisco.com |
Vaneeta Singh | |
Mavenir Systems | |
Sharda Towers, 56/13 Nandidurga Road | |
Bangalore 560046 | |
India | |
Email: | vaneeta@mavenir.com |
Victor Fajardo | |
Telcordia Technologies | |
1 Telcordia Drive #1S-222 | |
Piscataway, NJ 08854 | |
USA | |
Email: | vf0213@gmail.com |