| IS-IS Working Group | J. Tantsura |
| Internet-Draft | Individual |
| Intended status: Standards Track | U. Chunduri |
| Expires: September 2, 2017 | Huawei |
| S. Aldrin | |
| Google, Inc | |
| L. Ginsberg | |
| Cisco Systems | |
| March 1, 2017 |
Signaling MSD (Maximum SID Depth) using IS-IS
draft-ietf-isis-segment-routing-msd-01
This document proposes a way to signal Maximum SID Depth (MSD) supported by a node at node and/or link granularity by an ISIS Router. In a Segment Routing (SR) enabled network a centralized controller that programs SR tunnels needs to know the MSD supported by the head-end at node and/or link granularity to push the SID stack of an appropriate depth. MSD is relevent to the head-end of a SR tunnel or Binding-SID anchor node where Binding-SID expansions migth result in creation of a new SID stack.
This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79.
Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF). Note that other groups may also distribute working documents as Internet-Drafts. The list of current Internet-Drafts is at http://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/.
Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."
This Internet-Draft will expire on September 2, 2017.
Copyright (c) 2017 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the document authors. All rights reserved.
This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal Provisions Relating to IETF Documents (http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of publication of this document. Please review these documents carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect to this document. Code Components extracted from this document must include Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as described in the Simplified BSD License.
When Segment Routing tunnels are computed by a centralized controller, it is critical that the controller learns the MSD "Maximum SID Depth" of the node or link SR tunnel exits over, so the SID stack depth of a path computed doesn't exceed that the node is capable of imposing. This document describes how to use IS-IS to signal the MSD of a node or link to a centralized controller.
PCEP SR extensions draft [I-D.ietf-pce-segment-routing] signals MSD in SR PCE Capability TLV and METRIC Object. However, if PCEP is not supported/configured on the head-end of a SR tunnel or a Binding-SID anchor node and controller does not participate in IGP routing, it has no way to learn the MSD of nodes and links MSD has been configured. BGP-LS [RFC7752] defines a way to expose topology and associated attributes and capabilities of the nodes in that topology to a centralized controller. MSD signaling by BGP-LS has been defined in [I-D.tantsura-idr-bgp-ls-segment-routing-msd]. Tipicaly, BGP-LS is configured on a small number of nodes, that do not necessarily act as head-ends. In order, for BGP-LS to signal MSD for the all nodes and links in the network MSD is relevant, MSD capabilites should be distributed to every IS-IS router in the network.
[I-D.ietf-isis-mpls-elc] defines Readable Label Deepth Capability (RLDC) that is used by a head-end to insert Entropy Label (EL) at appropriate depth, so it coud be read by transit nodes. MSD in contrary signals ability to push SID's stack of a particular depth.
MSD of type 1 (IANA Registry) is used to signal number of SID a node is capable of imposing, to be used by a path computation element/controller and is only relevant to the part of the stack created as the result of the computation. In case, there are additional labels (e.g. service) that are to be pushed to the stack - MSD SHOULD be adjusted to reflect that. In the future, new MSD types could be defined to signal additional capabilities: entropy labels, labels that can be pushed thru recirculation, etc.
BGP-LS:Distribution of Link-State and TE Information using Border Gateway Protocol
ISIS: Intermediate System to Intermediate System
MSD: Maximum SID Depth
PCC: Path Computation Client
PCE: Path Computation Element
PCEP: Path Computation Element Protocol
SID: Segment Identifier
SR: Segment Routing
The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT", "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described in RFC 2119 [RFC2119].
This memo makes use of the terms defined in [RFC4971].
A new sub-TLV within the body of IS-IS Router Capability TLV [RFC4971], Node MSD sub-TLV is defined to carry the provisioned MSD of the router originating the Router Capability TLV. Node MSD is the lowest MSD supported by the node and can be provisioned in IS-IS instance.
0 1 2 3
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Type | Length | Sub-Type and Value |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
Figure 1: Node MSD Sub-TLV
The Type (1 byte) of this sub-TLV is TBD (IANA).
Length is variable (minimum of 2, multiple of 2 octets) and represents the total length of value field.
Value field consists of a 1 octet sub-type (IANA Registry) and 1 octet value.
Sub-Type 1 (IANA Section), MSD and the Value field contains maximum MSD of the router originating the Router Capability TLV. Node Maximum MSD is a number in the range of 0-254. 0 represents lack of the ability to push MSD of any depth; any other value represents that of the node. This value SHOULD represent the lowest value supported by node.
Other Sub-types other than defined above are reserved for future extensions. This TLV is optional. The scope of the advertisement is specific to the deployment.
A new sub-TLV - Link MSD sub-TLV is defined to carry the provisioned MSD of the interface associated with the link.
0 1 2 3
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Type | Length | Sub-Type and Value |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
Figure 2: Link MSD Sub-TLV
The Type (1 byte) of this sub-TLV is TBD (IANA).
Length is variable and similar to what is defined in Section 3.
Value field consists of a 1 octet sub-type (IANA Registry) and 1 octet value.
Sub-Type 1 (IANA Section), MSD and the Value field contains Link MSD of the router originating the corresponding TLV's 22, 23, 141, 222, and 223. Link MSD is a number in the range of 0-254. 0 represents lack of the ability to push MSD of any depth; any other value represents that of the particular link MSD value.
When both Node MSD and Link MSD are present, the value in the Link MSD MUST be used.
This document includes a request to IANA to allocate sub-TLV type codes for the new sub TLV proposed in Section 3 of this document from IS-IS Router Capability TLV Registry as defined by [RFC4971]. Also for link MSD, we request IANA to allocate new sub-TLV codes as defined in Section 4 from Sub-TLVs for TLVs 22, 23, 141, 222 and 223 registry.
This document also request IANA to create a new Sub-type registry as proposed in Section 3, Section 4.
Value Name Reference
----- --------------------- -------------
0 Reserved This document
1 MSD This document
2-250 Unassigned This document
251-254 Experimental This document
255 Reserved This document
Figure 3: MSD Sub-type Codepoints Registry
This document describes a mechanism to signal Segment Routing MSD supported at node and/or link granularity through IS-IS LSPs and does not introduce any new security issues.
The following people contributed to this document:
Peter Psenak
Email: ppsenak@cisco.com
The authors would like to thank Stephane Litkowski and Bruno Decraene for their reviews and valuable comments.
| [RFC2119] | Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, DOI 10.17487/RFC2119, March 1997. |
| [RFC4971] | Vasseur, JP., Shen, N. and R. Aggarwal, "Intermediate System to Intermediate System (IS-IS) Extensions for Advertising Router Information", RFC 4971, DOI 10.17487/RFC4971, July 2007. |
| [RFC5305] | Li, T. and H. Smit, "IS-IS Extensions for Traffic Engineering", RFC 5305, DOI 10.17487/RFC5305, October 2008. |