JMAP | K. Murchison |
Internet-Draft | Fastmail |
Intended status: Standards Track | July 23, 2019 |
Expires: January 24, 2020 |
A JSON Meta Application Protocol (JMAP) Subprotocol for WebSocket
draft-ietf-jmap-websocket-03
This document defines a binding for the JSON Meta Application Protocol (JMAP) over a WebSocket transport layer. The WebSocket binding for JMAP provides higher performance than the current HTTP binding for JMAP.
This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79.
Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF). Note that other groups may also distribute working documents as Internet-Drafts. The list of current Internet-Drafts is at https://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/.
Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."
This Internet-Draft will expire on January 24, 2020.
Copyright (c) 2019 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the document authors. All rights reserved.
This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal Provisions Relating to IETF Documents (https://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of publication of this document. Please review these documents carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect to this document. Code Components extracted from this document must include Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as described in the Simplified BSD License.
JMAP over HTTP requires that every JMAP API request be authenticated. Depending on the type of authentication used by the JMAP client and the configuration of the JMAP server, authentication could be an expensive operation both in time and resources. In such circumstances, authenticating every JMAP API request may harm performance.
The WebSocket binding for JMAP eliminates this performance hit by authenticating just the WebSocket handshake request and having those credentials remain in effect for the duration of the WebSocket connection. This binding supports JMAP API requests and responses, with optional support for push notifications.
Furthermore, the WebSocket binding for JMAP can optionally compress both JMAP API requests and responses. Although compression of HTTP responses is ubiquitous, compression of HTTP requests has very low, if any deployment, and therefore isn't a viable option for JMAP API requests over HTTP.
The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT", "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "NOT RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described in BCP 14 [RFC2119] [RFC8174] when, and only when, they appear in all capitals, as shown here.
The same terminology is used in this document as in the core JMAP specification.
The JMAP capabilities object is returned as part of the standard JMAP Session object (see Section 2 of [RFC8620]). Servers supporting this specification MUST add a property named "urn:ietf:params:jmap:websocket" to the capabilities object. The value of this property is an object which MUST contain the following information on server capabilities:
Example:
"urn:ietf:params:jmap:websocket": { "webSocketUrl": "https://server.example.com/jmap/ws/", "supportsWebSocketPush": true }
The term WebSocket subprotocol refers to an application-level protocol layered on top of a WebSocket connection. This document specifies the WebSocket JMAP subprotocol for carrying JMAP API requests, responses, and optional push notifications through a WebSocket connection. Binary data MUST NOT be uploaded or downloaded through a WebSocket JMAP connection. Binary data is handled per Section 6 of [RFC8620] via a separate HTTP connection or stream.
The JMAP WebSocket client and JMAP WebSocket server negotiate the use of the WebSocket JMAP subprotocol during the WebSocket handshake, either via a HTTP/1.1 Upgrade request (see Section 1.3 of [RFC6455]) or a HTTP/2 Extended CONNECT request (see Section 5 of [RFC8441]).
Regardless of the method used for the WebSocket handshake, the client MUST make an authenticated HTTP request on the JMAP "webSocketUrl", and the client MUST include the value "jmap" in the list of protocols for the "Sec-WebSocket-Protocol" header field. The reply from the server MUST also contain "jmap" in its corresponding "Sec-WebSocket-Protocol" header field in order for a JMAP subprotocol connection to be established.
If a client receives a handshake response that does not include "jmap" in the "Sec-WebSocket-Protocol" header, then a JMAP subprotocol WebSocket connection was not established and the client MUST close the WebSocket connection.
Once the handshake has successfully completed, the WebSocket connection is established and can be used for JMAP API requests, responses, and optional push notifications. Other message types MUST NOT be transmitted over this connection.
The credentials used for authenticating the HTTP request to initiate the handshake remain in effect for the duration of the WebSocket connection.
Data frame messages in the JMAP subprotocol MUST be of the text type and contain UTF-8 encoded data. The messages MUST be in the form of a single JMAP Request object (see Section 3.2 of [RFC8620]), JMAP WebSocketPushEnable object (see Section 4.2.4.2), or JMAP WebSocketPushDisable object (see Section 4.2.4.3) when sent from the client to the server, and in the form of a single JMAP Response object, JSON Problem Details object, or JMAP StateChange object (see Sections 3.3, 3.5.1, and 7.1 respectively of [RFC8620]) when sent from the server to the client.
This specification adds two extra arguments to the Request object:
JMAP over WebSocket allows the server to process requests out of order. The client-specified identifier is used as a mechanism for the client to correlate requests and responses.
Additionally, the "maxConcurrentRequests" field in the "capabilities" object (see Section 2 of [RFC8620]) limits the number of inflight requests over the WebSocket.
This specification adds two extra arguments to the Response object:
This specification adds two extra arguments to the Problem Details object:
JMAP over WebSocket servers that support push notifications on the WebSocket will advertise a "supportsWebSocketPush" property with a value of true in the server capabilities object.
All push notifications take the form of a standard StateChange object (see Section 7.1 of [RFC8620]).
This specification adds one extra argument to the StateChange object:
A client enables push notifications from the server by sending a WebSocketPushEnable object to the server. A WebSocketPushEnable object has the following properties:
A client disables push notifications from the server by sending a WebSocketPushDisable object to the server. A WebSocketPushDisable object has the following property:
The following examples show WebSocket JMAP opening handshakes, a JMAP Core/echo request and response, and a subsequent closing handshake. The examples assume that the JMAP "webSocketUrl" has been advertised in the JMAP Session object as "/jmap/ws/". Note that folding of header fields is for editorial purposes only.
WebSocket JMAP connection via HTTP/1.1 with push notifications for mail [I-D.ietf-jmap-mail] enabled:
[[ From Client ]] [[ From Server ]] GET /jmap/ws/ HTTP/1.1 Host: server.example.com Upgrade: websocket Connection: Upgrade Authorization: Basic Zm9vOmJhcg== Sec-WebSocket-Key: dGhlIHNhbXBsZSBub25jZQ== Sec-WebSocket-Protocol: jmap Sec-WebSocket-Version: 13 Origin: http://www.example.com HTTP/1.1 101 Switching Protocols Upgrade: websocket Connection: Upgrade Sec-WebSocket-Accept: s3pPLMBiTxaQ9kYGzzhZRbK+xOo= Sec-WebSocket-Protocol: jmap [WebSocket connection established] WS_DATA { "@type": "WebSocketPushEnable", "dataTypes": [ "Mailbox", "Email" ], "pushState": "aaa" } WS_DATA { "@type": "StateChange", "changed": { "a456": { "Email": "d35ecb040aab" } }, "pushState": "bbb" } WS_DATA { "@type": "Request", "id": "R1", "using": [ "urn:ietf:params:jmap:core" ], "methodCalls": [ [ "Core/echo", { "hello": true, "high": 5 }, "b3ff" ] ] } WS_DATA { "@type": "Response", "requestId": "R1", "methodResponses": [ [ "Core/echo", { "hello": true, "high": 5 }, "b3ff" ] ] } WS_DATA The quick brown fox jumps over the lazy dog. WS_DATA { "@type": "RequestError", "requestId": null, "type": "urn:ietf:params:jmap:error:notJSON", "status": 400, "detail": "The request did not parse as I-JSON." } WS_DATA { "@type": "StateChange", "changed": { "a123": { "Mailbox": "0af7a512ce70" } } "pushState": "ccc" } WS_CLOSE WS_CLOSE [WebSocket connection closed]
WebSocket JMAP connection on a HTTP/2 stream which also negotiates compression:
[[ From Client ]] [[ From Server ]] SETTINGS SETTINGS_ENABLE_CONNECT_PROTOCOL = 1 HEADERS + END_HEADERS :method = CONNECT :protocol = websocket :scheme = https :path = /jmap/ws/ :authority = server.example.com authorization = Basic Zm9vOmJhcg== sec-websocket-protocol = jmap sec-websocket-version = 13 sec-websocket-extensions = permessage-deflate origin = http://www.example.com HEADERS + END_HEADERS :status = 200 sec-websocket-protocol = jmap sec-websocket-extensions = permessage-deflate [WebSocket connection established] DATA WS_DATA [compressed text] DATA WS_DATA [compressed text] ... DATA + END_STREAM WS_CLOSE DATA + END_STREAM WS_CLOSE [WebSocket connection closed] [HTTP/2 stream closed]
The security considerations for both WebSocket (see Section 10 of [RFC6455]) and JMAP (see Section 8 of [RFC8620]) apply to the WebSocket JMAP subprotocol.
This specification requests IANA to register the WebSocket JMAP subprotocol under the "WebSocket Subprotocol Name" Registry with the following data:
The author would like to thank the following individuals for contributing their ideas and support for writing this specification: Neil Jenkins, Robert Mueller, and Chris Newman.
[RFC2119] | Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, DOI 10.17487/RFC2119, March 1997. |
[RFC6455] | Fette, I. and A. Melnikov, "The WebSocket Protocol", RFC 6455, DOI 10.17487/RFC6455, December 2011. |
[RFC7235] | Fielding, R. and J. Reschke, "Hypertext Transfer Protocol (HTTP/1.1): Authentication", RFC 7235, DOI 10.17487/RFC7235, June 2014. |
[RFC8174] | Leiba, B., "Ambiguity of Uppercase vs Lowercase in RFC 2119 Key Words", BCP 14, RFC 8174, DOI 10.17487/RFC8174, May 2017. |
[RFC8441] | McManus, P., "Bootstrapping WebSockets with HTTP/2", RFC 8441, DOI 10.17487/RFC8441, September 2018. |
[RFC8620] | Jenkins, N. and C. Newman, "The JSON Meta Application Protocol (JMAP)", RFC 8620, DOI 10.17487/RFC8620, July 2019. |
[I-D.ietf-jmap-mail] | Jenkins, N. and C. Newman, "JMAP (JSON Meta Application Protocol) for Mail", Internet-Draft draft-ietf-jmap-mail-16, March 2019. |
[RFC7692] | Yoshino, T., "Compression Extensions for WebSocket", RFC 7692, DOI 10.17487/RFC7692, December 2015. |
Changes since ietf-02:
Changes since ietf-01:
Changes since ietf-00:
Changes since murchison-02:
Changes since murchison-01:
Changes since murchison-00: