| MILE Working Group | S. Banghart |
| Internet-Draft | NIST |
| Intended status: Informational | J. Field |
| Expires: September 27, 2019 | Pivotal |
| March 26, 2019 |
Definition of ROLIE CSIRT Extension
draft-ietf-mile-rolie-csirt-02
This document extends the Resource-Oriented Lightweight Information Exchange (ROLIE) core to add the information type categories and related requirements needed to support Computer Security Incident Response Team (CSIRT) use cases. The indicator and incident information types are defined as ROLIE extensions. Additional supporting requirements are also defined that describe the use of specific formats and link relations pertaining to the new information types.
This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79.
Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF). Note that other groups may also distribute working documents as Internet-Drafts. The list of current Internet-Drafts is at https://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/.
Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."
This Internet-Draft will expire on September 27, 2019.
Copyright (c) 2019 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the document authors. All rights reserved.
This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal Provisions Relating to IETF Documents (https://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of publication of this document. Please review these documents carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect to this document. Code Components extracted from this document must include Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as described in the Simplified BSD License.
Threats to computer security are evolving ever more rapidly as time goes on. As software increases in complexity, the number of vulnerabilities in systems and networks can increase exponentially. Threat actors looking to exploit these vulnerabilities are making more frequent and more widely distributed attacks across a large variety of systems. The adoption of liberal information sharing amongst attackers allows a discovered vulnerability to be shared and used to attack a vulnerable system within a narrow window of time. As the skills and knowledge required to identify and combat these attacks become more and more specialized, even a well established and secure system may find itself unable to quickly respond to an incident. Effective identification of and response to a sophisticated attack requires open cooperation and collaboration between defending operators, software vendors, and end-users. To improve the timeliness of responses, automation must be used to acquire, contextualize, and put to use shared computer security information.
CSIRTS share two primary forms of information: incidents and indicators. Using these forms of information, analysts are able to perform a wide range of activities both proactive and reactive to ensure the security of their systems.
Incident information describes a cyber security incident. Such information may include attack characteristics, information about the attacker, and attack vector data. Sharing this information helps analysts within the sharing community to inoculate their systems against similar attacks, providing proactive protection.
Indicator information describes the symptoms or necessary pre-conditions of an attack. Everything from system vulnerabilities to unexpected network traffic can help analysts secure systems and prepare for an attack. Making this information available for sharing aids in the proactive defense of systems both within an operating unit but also for any CSIRTs that are part of a sharing consortium.
As a means to bring automation of content discovery and dissemination into the CSIRT domain, this specification provides an extension to the Resource-Oriented Lightweight Information Exchange (ROLIE) core [RFC8322] designed to address CSIRT use cases. The primary purpose of this extension is to define two new information types: incident, and indicator, along with formats and link relations that support these information-types.
The key words "MUST," "MUST NOT," "REQUIRED," "SHALL," "SHALL NOT," "SHOULD," "SHOULD NOT," "RECOMMENDED," "MAY," and "OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described in [RFC2119].
Definitions for some of the common computer security-related terminology used in this document can be found in Section 2 of [RFC5070].
This document specifies the following additional requirements for use of the Atom Publishing Protocol.[RFC5023]
This document defines the following requirements on HTTP request behavior:
The forward slash resource URL SHOULD be supported as defined in Section 5.5. Note that this is a stricter requirement than [RFC8322].
When an "atom:category" element has a "scheme" attribute equal to "urn:ietf:params:rolie:category:information-type", the "term" attribute defines the information type of the associated resource. A new valid "term" value for this "scheme": "incident", is described in this section, and registered in Section 8.1.1.
The "incident" information type represents any information describing or pertaining to a computer security incident. This document uses the definition of incident provided by [RFC4949]. Provided below is a non-exhaustive list of information that may be considered to be an incident information type.
Note again that this list is not exhaustive, any information that in is the abstract realm of an incident should be classified under this information-type.
When an "atom:category" element has a "scheme" attribute equal to "urn:ietf:params:rolie:category:information-type", the "term" attribute defines the information type of the associated resource. A new valid "term" value for this "scheme": "indicator", is described in this section, and registered in Section 8.1.2.
The "indicator" information type represents computer security indicators or any information surrounding them. This document uses the definition of indicator provided by [RFC4949]. Some examples of indicator information is provided below, but note that indicator is defined in an abstract sense, to be understood as a flexible and widely-applicable definition.
This list is intended to provide examples of the indicator information-type, not to define it.
This section defines usage guidance and additional requirements related to data formats above and beyond those specified in [RFC8322]. The following formats are expected to be commonly used to express software descriptor information. For this reason, this document specifies additional requirements to ensure interoperability.
The Incident Object Description Exchange Format (IODEF) is a format for representing computer security information commonly exchanged between Computer Security Incident Response Teams (CSIRTs) or other operational security teams.
IODEF conveys indicators, incident reports, response activities, and related meta-data in an XML serialization. This information is formally structured in order to support and encourage automated machine-to-machine security communication, as well as enhanced processing at the endpoint.
The full IODEF specification [RFC7970] provides further high-level discussion and technical details.
For an Entry to be considered as a "IODEF Entry", it MUST fulfill the following conditions:
A "IODEF Entry" MUST conform to the following requirements:
STIX is a structured language for describing a wide range of security resources. STIX approaches the problem with a focus on flexibility, automation, readability, and extensibility.
The full STIX specification [stix2] provides further high-level discussion and technical details.
For an Entry to be considered as a "STIX Entry", it MUST fulfill the following conditions:
A "STIX Entry" MUST conform to the following requirements:
MISP involves documentation, utilities, and formats designed to faciliate the day-to=day duties of security operators. MISP includes it's own data format that is used to share between MISP features. While MISP has Feed features that can share and distribute events, it has support for linking to other sharing methods like ROLIE.
MISP is defined by a family of internet drafts and are actively being worked on. With that in mind, this extension will provice non-normative guidance on using MISP format data in ROLIE. In the future, when the MISP format is formally published, this document will be updated to normative requirements around MISP content.
MISP content should be syndicated in ROLIE using the following guidance:
MISP Feeds are hosted lists of MISP events, each event represented by its uuid. Users request Events on a one-by-one basis and are served the full Event on each request.
MISP Manifest files list MISP events by their uuids as well, but provide a variety of metadata for each Event inline. After examining the minimized and stripped Event in the manifest, a user could search for the Event uuid of interest in a locally located folder of Event files where the file name is the uuid of the Event.
ROLIE hosting MISP data would operate as a combination of these approaches. Each ROLIE Feed would contain a list of Event Entries, each with metadata and identifying information about a given Event. SHould the user be interested in the Event, the Event Entry provides a direct link to download the full Event. In short, a ROLIE MISP Feed is minimumally mappable to a MISP Manifest file where a resolvable link to the MISP Event was injected into each Event described in the Manifest.
With that in mind, a MISP Feed as well as a MISP Manifest with attached local file list could be fully converted and hosted as a ROLIE repository. As a lower overhead alternative, a ROLIE server could simply provide a view into MISP data.
This section defines additional link relationships that implementations MUST support. These relationships are not registered in the Link Relation IANA table as their use case is too narrow. Each relationship is named and described.
These relations come in related pairs. The first of each pair is expected to be more common, as they can be determined at the time that the Entry is created. The second of each pair will often need to be added retroactively to an Entry.
If a ROLIE server supports either the incident information-types, then these link relations MUST be support
| Name | Description | Conformance |
|---|---|---|
| indicators | Provides a link to a collection of zero or more instances of cyber security indicators that are associated with the resource. | evidence |
| Provides a link to a collection of zero or more resources that provides some proof of attribution for an incident. The evidence may or may not have any identified chain of custody. | attacker | Provides a link to a collection of zero or more resources that provides a representation of the attacker. |
| vector | Provides a link to a collection of zero or more resources that provides a representation of the method used by the attacker. |
If a ROLIE server supports the indicator information-types, then these link relations MUST be supported.
| Name | Description | Conformance |
|---|---|---|
| incidents | Provides a link to a collection of zero or more instances of incident representations associated with the resource. |
If a ROLIE server supports either the incident or the indicator information-types, then these link relations MUST be supported.
| Name | Description | Conformance |
|---|---|---|
| assessments | Provides a link to a collection of zero or more resources that represent the results of executing a benchmark. | reports |
| Provides a link to a collection of zero or more resources that represent RID reports. | traceRequests | Provides a link to a collection of zero or more resources that represent RID traceRequests. |
| investigationRequests | Provides a link to a collection of zero or more resources that represent RID investigationRequests. |
This document registers two additional registered atom:category names: 'urn:ietf:params:rolie:category:csirt:iodef:purpose' and 'urn:ietf:params:rolie:category:csirt:iodef:restriction'. These categories IODEF content exposure provides valuable metadata for the searching and organization of IODEF documents.
When the name attribute of the category is 'urn:ietf:params:rolie:category:csirt:iodef:purpose', the value attribute SHOULD be constrained as per section 3.2 of IODEF [RFC7970], e.g. traceback, mitigation, reporting, or other.
When the name attribute of the category is 'urn:ietf:params:rolie:category:csirt:iodef:restriction', the value attribute SHOULD be constrained as per section 3.2 of IODEF [RFC7970], e.g. public, need-to-know, private, default.
It is frequently the case that an organization will need to triage their investigation and response activities based upon, e.g., the state of the current threat environment, or simply as a result of having limited resources.
In order to enable operators to effectively prioritize their response activity, it is RECOMMENDED that feed implementers provide Atom categories that correspond to the IODEF Expectation and Impact classes. The availability of these feed categories will enable clients to more easily retrieve and prioritize cyber security information that has already been identified as having a specific potential impact, or having a specific expectation.
Support for these categories may also enable efficiencies for organizations that already have established (or plan to establish) operational processes and workflows that are based on these IODEF classes.
IANA has added the following entries to the "ROLIE Security Resource Information Type Sub-Registry" registry located at <https://www.iana.org/assignments/rolie/category/information-type> .
The entry is as follows:
The entry is as follows:
IANA has added the following entries to the "ROLIE URN Parameters" registry located in <https://www.iana.org/assignments/rolie/>.
The entry is as follows:
The entry is as follows:
IANA has added the following entries to the "ROLIE URN Parameters" registry located in <https://www.iana.org/assignments/rolie/>.
The entry is as follows:
This document implies the use of ROLIE in high-security use cases, as such, added care should be taken to fortify and secure ROLIE repositories and clients using this extension. The guidance in the ROLIE core specification is strongly recommended, and implementers should consider adding additional security measures as they see fit.
When providing a private workspace for closed sharing, it is recommended that the ROLIE repository checks user authorization when the user sends a GET request to the service document. If the user is not authorized to send any requests to a given workspace or collection, that workspace or collection should be truncated from the service document in the response. In this way the existence of unauthorized content remains unknown to potential attackers, hopefully reducing attack surface.
| [I-D.dulaunoy-misp-core-format] | Dulaunoy, A. and A. Iklody, "MISP core format", Internet-Draft draft-dulaunoy-misp-core-format-07, February 2019. |
| [RFC2119] | Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, DOI 10.17487/RFC2119, March 1997. |
| [RFC4287] | Nottingham, M. and R. Sayre, "The Atom Syndication Format", RFC 4287, DOI 10.17487/RFC4287, December 2005. |
| [RFC4949] | Shirey, R., "Internet Security Glossary, Version 2", FYI 36, RFC 4949, DOI 10.17487/RFC4949, August 2007. |
| [RFC5023] | Gregorio, J. and B. de hOra, "The Atom Publishing Protocol", RFC 5023, DOI 10.17487/RFC5023, October 2007. |
| [RFC5070] | Danyliw, R., Meijer, J. and Y. Demchenko, "The Incident Object Description Exchange Format", RFC 5070, DOI 10.17487/RFC5070, December 2007. |
| [RFC7970] | Danyliw, R., "The Incident Object Description Exchange Format Version 2", RFC 7970, DOI 10.17487/RFC7970, November 2016. |
| [RFC8322] | Field, J., Banghart, S. and D. Waltermire, "Resource-Oriented Lightweight Information Exchange (ROLIE)", RFC 8322, DOI 10.17487/RFC8322, February 2018. |
| [stix2] | "Structured Threat Information Expression 2.0", July 2017. |
Use of this extension in a ROLIE repository will not typically change that repository's operation. As such, the general examples provided by the ROLIE core document would serve as examples. Provided below is a sample incident ROLIE entry containing an IODEF document:
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<entry xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:rolie="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:rolie-1.0">
<id>f762c77c-057d-45c9-b805-677ab89aaf7c</id>
<title>Sample Incident</title>
<published>2018-09-04T18:13:51.0Z</published>
<updated>2019-08-05T18:13:51.0Z</updated>
<summary>A document containing an indicator of comprimise. </summary>
<link rel="self" href="http://www.example.org/rolie/CSIRT/123456"/>
<link rel="feed" href="http://www.example.org/rolie/CSIRT/"/>
<rolie:property name=urn:ietf:params:rolie:property:content-id
value="id847201"/>
<category
scheme="urn:ietf:params:rolie:category:information-type"
term="incident"/>
<rolie:format
ns="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:iodef-2.0"/>
<content type="application/xml"
src="http://www.example.org/rolie/csirt/123456/data"/>
</entry>
Below is a sample indicator ROLIE entry containing a STIX document:
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<entry xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:rolie="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:rolie-1.0">
<id>0c99df51-767f-4940-8a09-c4b607b6fe21</id>
<title>Sample Indicator</title>
<published>2018-09-04T18:13:51.0Z</published>
<updated>2019-08-05T18:13:51.0Z</updated>
<summary>A document containing an incident report. </summary>
<link rel="self" href="http://www.example.org/rolie/CSIRT/654321"/>
<link rel="feed" href="http://www.example.org/rolie/CSIRT/"/>
<rolie:property name=urn:ietf:params:rolie:property:content-id
value="exmaple:indicator:654321"/>
<category
scheme="urn:ietf:params:rolie:category:information-type"
term="indicator"/>
<rolie:format
ns=http://stix.mitre.org/XMLSchema/core/1.2/stix_core.xsd"/>
<content type="application/xml"
src="http://www.example.org/rolie/csirt/654321/data"/>
</entry>