Network Working Group | B. Decraene |
Internet-Draft | Orange |
Updates: 4379, 6424 (if approved) | N. Akiya |
Intended status: Standards Track | C. Pignataro |
Expires: September 7, 2015 | Cisco Systems |
L. Andersson | |
S. Aldrin | |
Huawei Technologies | |
March 6, 2015 |
IANA registries for LSP ping Code Points
draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-registry-03
RFC 4379 and RFC 6424 created name spaces for Multiprotocol Label Switching (MPLS) Label Switched Path (LSP) Ping. However, those RFCs did not create the corresponding IANA registries for the Downstream Mapping object Flags (DS Flags), Multipath Type, Pad TLV and Address Types.
There is now a need to make further code point allocations from these name spaces. This document updates RFC 4379 and RFC 6424 in that it creates the IANA registries for that purpose.
This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79.
Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF). Note that other groups may also distribute working documents as Internet-Drafts. The list of current Internet-Drafts is at http://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/.
Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."
This Internet-Draft will expire on September 7, 2015.
Copyright (c) 2015 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the document authors. All rights reserved.
This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal Provisions Relating to IETF Documents (http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of publication of this document. Please review these documents carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect to this document. Code Components extracted from this document must include Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as described in the Simplified BSD License.
[RFC4379] and [RFC6424] created name spaces for MPLS LSP Ping. However, those RFCs did not create the corresponding IANA registries for DS Flags, Multipath Type, Pad TLV and Address Types.
There is now a need to make further code point allocations from these name spaces. In particular [I-D.ietf-mpls-entropy-lsp-ping] and [I-D.ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-lag-multipath] are requesting allocation for DS Flags and Multipath Type.
This document serves to update [RFC4379] and [RFC6424] in that it creates the IANA registries for that purpose.
Note that "DS Flags" and "Multipath Type" are fields included in two TLVs defined in "Multi-Protocol Label Switching (MPLS) Label Switched Paths (LSPs) Ping Parameters - TLVs" registry: Downstream Mapping TLV (value 2) and Downstream Detailed Mapping TLV (value 20). Modification to their registry will affect both TLVs.
This document requests IANA to create new registries within [IANA-MPLS-LSP-PING] protocol to maintain "DS Flags", "Multipath Type", "Pad TLV" and "Address Types" fields. Name of registries and initial values are described in immediate sub-sections to follow.
[RFC4379] defines the Downstream Mapping (DSMAP) TLV, which has the Type 2 assigned from the "Multi-Protocol Label Switching (MPLS) Label Switched Paths (LSPs) Ping Parameters - TLVs" registry.
[RFC6424] defines the Downstream Detailed Mapping (DDMAP) TLV, which has the Type 20 assigned from the "Multi-Protocol Label Switching (MPLS) Label Switched Paths (LSPs) Ping Parameters - TLVs" registry.
DSMAP has been deprecated by DDMAP, but both TLVs share a field: "DS Flags".
The IANA is requested to create and maintain a registry entitled "DS Flags" with the following registration procedure:
Registry Name: DS Flags. Bit number Name Reference ---------- ---------------------------------------- --------- 7 N: Treat as a Non-IP Packet RFC4379 6 I: Interface and Label Stack Object Request RFC4379 5-0 Unassigned
The IANA is requested to create and maintain a registry entitled "Multipath Type".
The registration policies [RFC5226] for this registry are:
0-250 Standards Action 251-254 Experimental Use 255 Standards Action
IANA is requested to make the following initial assignments:
Registry Name: Multipath Type. Value Meaning Reference ---------- ---------------------------------------- --------- 0 no multipath RFC4379 1 Unassigned 2 IP address RFC4379 3 Unassigned 4 IP address range RFC4379 5-7 Unassigned 8 Bit-masked IP address set RFC4379 9 Bit-masked label set RFC4379 10-250 Unassigned 251-254 Experimental This document 255 Reserved This document
The IANA is requested to create and maintain a registry entitled "Pad Type".
The registration policies [RFC5226] for this registry are:
0-250 Standards Action 251-254 Experimental Use 255 Standards Action
IANA is requested to make the following initial assignments:
Registry Name: Pad Type. Value Meaning Reference ---------- ---------------------------------------- --------- 0 Reserved This document 1 Drop Pad TLV from reply RFC4379 2 Copy Pad TLV to reply RFC4379 3-250 Unassigned 251-254 Experimental This document 255 Reserved This document
The IANA is requested to create and maintain a registry entitled "Interface and Label Stack Address Type".
The registration policies [RFC5226] for this registry are:
0-250 Standards Action 251-254 Experimental Use 255 Standards Action
IANA is requested to make the following initial assignments:
Registry Name: Interface and Label Stack Address Type. Value Meaning Reference ---------- ---------------------------------------- --------- 0 Reserved This document 1 IPv4 Numbered RFC4379 2 IPv4 Unnumbered RFC4379 3 IPv6 Numbered RFC4379 4 IPv6 Unnumbered RFC4379 5-250 Unassigned 251-254 Experimental This document 255 Reserved This document
This document simply creates IANA registries for code point defined in [RFC4379] and [RFC6424]. Thus, there are no new security concerns.
[RFC4379] | Kompella, K. and G. Swallow, "Detecting Multi-Protocol Label Switched (MPLS) Data Plane Failures", RFC 4379, February 2006. |
[RFC6424] | Bahadur, N., Kompella, K. and G. Swallow, "Mechanism for Performing Label Switched Path Ping (LSP Ping) over MPLS Tunnels", RFC 6424, November 2011. |
[I-D.ietf-mpls-entropy-lsp-ping] | Akiya, N., Swallow, G., Pignataro, C., Malis, A. and S. Aldrin, "Label Switched Path (LSP) and Pseudowire (PW) Ping/Trace over MPLS Network using Entropy Labels (EL)", Internet-Draft draft-ietf-mpls-entropy-lsp-ping-00, December 2014. |
[I-D.ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-lag-multipath] | Akiya, N., Swallow, G., Litkowski, S., Decraene, B. and J. Drake, "Label Switched Path (LSP) Ping/Trace Multipath Support for Link Aggregation Group (LAG) Interfaces", Internet-Draft draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-lag-multipath-00, January 2015. |
[IANA-MPLS-LSP-PING] | IANA, "Multi-Protocol Label Switching (MPLS) Label Switched Paths (LSPs) Ping Parameters", . |
[RFC5226] | Narten, T. and H. Alvestrand, "Guidelines for Writing an IANA Considerations Section in RFCs", BCP 26, RFC 5226, May 2008. |