| TOC |
|
This Internet-Draft is submitted to IETF in full conformance with the provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79. This document may contain material from IETF Documents or IETF Contributions published or made publicly available before November 10, 2008. The person(s) controlling the copyright in some of this material may not have granted the IETF Trust the right to allow modifications of such material outside the IETF Standards Process. Without obtaining an adequate license from the person(s) controlling the copyright in such materials, this document may not be modified outside the IETF Standards Process, and derivative works of it may not be created outside the IETF Standards Process, except to format it for publication as an RFC or to translate it into languages other than English.
Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF), its areas, and its working groups. Note that other groups may also distribute working documents as Internet-Drafts.
Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference material or to cite them other than as “work in progress.”
The list of current Internet-Drafts can be accessed at http://www.ietf.org/ietf/1id-abstracts.txt.
The list of Internet-Draft Shadow Directories can be accessed at http://www.ietf.org/shadow.html.
This Internet-Draft will expire on April 5, 2010.
Copyright (c) 2009 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the document authors. All rights reserved.
This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal Provisions Relating to IETF Documents in effect on the date of publication of this document (http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info). Please review these documents carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect to this document.
The NTP Server Option for Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol for IPv6 (DHCPv6) provides NTP (Network Time Protocol version 4) Server location information to DHCPv6 hosts.
1.
Introduction
2.
Requirements notation
3.
Related Work and Usage Model
4.
NTP Server Option for DHCPv6
4.1.
NTP Server Address Suboption
4.2.
NTP Multicast Address Suboption
4.3.
NTP Server FQDN Suboption
5.
Appearance of this Option
6.
Security Considerations
7.
RFC 4075 Deprecation
8.
IANA Considerations
9.
References
9.1.
Normative References
9.2.
Informative References
§
Authors' Addresses
| TOC |
This document defines a DHCPv6 option and associated suboptions to provide Network Time Protocol version 4 [draft-ntpv4] or greater Server location information to DHCPv6 hosts.
| TOC |
The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT", "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described in [RFC2119] (Bradner, S., “Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate Requirement Levels,” March 1997.).
| TOC |
The NTP service is publicly offered on the Internet by a number of organizations. Those Servers can be used but not abused, so any method which is tasked to disseminate locations of NTP Servers must act responsibly in a manner that does not lead to public Server overloading. When using DHCPv6 to offer NTP Server location, and if there is a need to distribute a host with a hardcoded configuration, this configuration MUST NOT include Server location that is not part of the organization that distributes this device. Typical usage of this option is to specify an NTP Server that is part of the organization that operates the DHCPv6 Server.
The location of the NTP service, like any other Internet service, can be specified by an IP address or a Fully Qualified Domain Name (FQDN). By design, DHCP offers information to multiple devices and is prone to amplification of mistakes, so great care must be taken to define its configuration. Specification of the NTP service by FQDN offers a level of indirection that works as a possible mitigation tool in case of misconfiguration. DNS can be used to redirect misconfigured clients to an IPv6 address that is not configured on any host instead of having to change the address of the NTP Server itself.
While the NTP specification defines a comprehensive set of configuration parameters, modification of those parameters is best left to the decision of the client itself. The DHCPv6 option for NTP is therefore restricted to Server location.
| TOC |
This option serves as a container for Server location information related to one NTP Server or Simple Network Time Protocol (SNTP) [RFC4330] (Mills, D., “Simple Network Time Protocol (SNTP) Version 4 for IPv4, IPv6 and OSI,” January 2006.) Server. This option can appear multiple times in a DHCPv6 message. Each instance of this option is to be considered by the NTP client or SNTP client as a Server to include in its configuration.
The option itself does not contain any value. Instead, it contains one or several suboptions that carry NTP Server or SNTP Server Server location. This option MUST include one, and only one, time source suboption. The currently defined time source suboptions are: NTP_OPTION_SRV_ADDR, NTP_OPTION_SRV_MC_ADDR, NTP_OPTION_SRV_FQDN. It carries the NTP Server or SNTP Server location, as a unicast or multicast IPv6 address or as an NTP Server or SNTP Server FQDN. More time source suboptions may be defined in the future. While the FQDN option offers the most deployment flexibility, resiliency as well as security, the IP address options are defined to cover cases where a DNS dependancy is not desirable.
If the NTP Server or SNTP Server location is an IPv6 multicast address, the client SHOULD use this address as an NTP multicast group address and listen to messages sent to this group in order to synchronize its clock.
The format of the NTP Server Option is:
0 1 2 3
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| OPTION_NTP_SERVER | option-len |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| suboption-1 |
: :
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| suboption-2 |
: :
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
: :
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| suboption-n |
: :
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
option-code: OPTION_NTP_SERVER (TBD_IANA),
option-len: Total length of the included suboptions.
This document does not define any priority relationship between the client's embedded configuration (if any) and the NTP or SNTP Servers discovered via this option. In particular, the client is allowed to simultaneously use its own configured NTP Servers or SNTP Servers and the Servers discovered via DHCP.
| TOC |
This suboption is intended to appear inside the OPTION_NTP_SERVER option. It specifies the IPv6 unicast address of an NTP Server or SNTP Server available to the client.
The format of the NTP Server Address Suboption is:
0 1 2 3
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| NTP_SUBOPTION_SRV_ADDR | suboption-len = 16 |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| |
| |
| IPv6 address of NTP Server |
| |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
suboption-code: NTP_SUBOPTION_SRV_ADDR (1),
suboption-len: 16.
| TOC |
This suboption is intended to appear inside the OPTION_NTP_SERVER option. It specifies the IPv6 address of the IPv6 multicast group address used by NTP on the local network.
The format of the NTP Multicast Address Suboption is:
0 1 2 3
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| NTP_SUBOPTION_MC_ADDR | suboption-len = 16 |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| |
| |
| Multicast IPv6 address |
| |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
suboption-code: NTP_SUBOPTION_MC_ADDR (2),
suboption-len: 16.
| TOC |
This suboption is intended to appear inside the OPTION_NTP_SERVER option. It specifies the FQDN of an NTP Server or SNTP Server available to the client.
The format of the NTP Server FQDN Suboption is:
0 1 2 3
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| NTP_SUBOPTION_SRV_FQDN | suboption-len |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| |
| FQDN of NTP Server |
: :
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
suboption-code: NTP_SUBOPTION_SRV_FQDN (3),
suboption-len: Length of the included FQDN field,
FQDN: Fully Qualified Domain Name of the NTP Server or SNTP Server.
This field MUST be encoded as described in [RFC3315],
section 8.
| TOC |
The OPTION_NTP_SERVER option can appear multiple times in a DHCPv6 message. The order in which these options appear is not significant. The client uses its usual algorithms to determine which Server(s) or multicast group(s) should be prefered to synchronize its clock.
The OPTION_NTP_SERVER option MUST NOT appear in messages other than the following: Solicit, Advertise, Request, Renew, Rebind, Information-Request, and Reply. If this option appears in messages other than those specified above, the receiver MUST ignore it.
The option number for this option MAY appear in the "Option Request" option [RFC3315] (Droms, R., Bound, J., Volz, B., Lemon, T., Perkins, C., and M. Carney, “Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol for IPv6 (DHCPv6),” July 2003.) in the following messages: Solicit, Request, Renew, Rebind, Information-Request, and Reconfigure. If this option number appears in the "Option Request" option in messages other than those specified above, the receiver SHOULD ignore it.
| TOC |
This option could be used by an intruder to advertise the address of a malicious NTP Server or SNTP Server and adversely affect the clock of clients on the network. The consequences of such an attack can be critical, because many security protocols depend on time synchronization to run their algorithms. As an example, an attacker could break connectivity between SEND-enabled nodes [RFC3971] (Arkko, J., Kempf, J., Zill, B., and P. Nikander, “SEcure Neighbor Discovery (SEND),” March 2005.), simply by affecting the clock on these nodes.
To prevent these attacks, it is strongly advisable to secure the use of this option either by:
- using the NTPv4 Autokey public key authentication, as defined
in [draft-autokey] or,
- using authenticated DHCP as described in [RFC3315] section 21.
| TOC |
[RFC4075] (Kalusivalingam, V., “Simple Network Time Protocol (SNTP) Configuration Option for DHCPv6,” May 2005.) (SNTP Configuration Option for DHCPv6) provides some degree of automatic time Server configuration for IPv6, as it specifies how to transmit SNTP [RFC4330] (Mills, D., “Simple Network Time Protocol (SNTP) Version 4 for IPv4, IPv6 and OSI,” January 2006.) Servers addresses through DHCPv6. However this approach is not suitable for all NTP deployments. It is not an extensible mechanism and introduces some semantic confusion throught the use of the "SNTP" acronym. Additionally the approach of only offering IPv6 addresses to specify Server location does not meet NTP requirements that make use of a FQDN (Fully Qualified Domain Name) as well. For all the abovementioned reasons, this document makes [RFC4075] (Kalusivalingam, V., “Simple Network Time Protocol (SNTP) Configuration Option for DHCPv6,” May 2005.) deprecated.
| TOC |
When this document is published, the IANA is requested to assign an option code from the "DHCPv6 Options Codes" registry for OPTION_NTP_SERVER.
| TOC |
| TOC |
| [RFC3315] | Droms, R., Bound, J., Volz, B., Lemon, T., Perkins, C., and M. Carney, “Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol for IPv6 (DHCPv6),” RFC 3315, July 2003 (TXT). |
| [draft-ntpv4] | Burbank, J., Kasch, W., Martin, J., and D. Mills, “Network Time Protocol Version 4 Protocol And Algorithms Specification,” draft-ietf-ntp-ntpv4-proto-11 (work in progress), September 2008. |
| [draft-autokey] | Haberman, B. and D. Mills, “Network Time Protocol Version 4 Autokey Specification,” draft-ietf-ntp-autokey-06 (work in progress), July 2009. |
| TOC |
| [RFC2119] | Bradner, S., “Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate Requirement Levels,” BCP 14, RFC 2119, March 1997 (TXT, HTML, XML). |
| [RFC3971] | Arkko, J., Kempf, J., Zill, B., and P. Nikander, “SEcure Neighbor Discovery (SEND),” RFC 3971, March 2005 (TXT). |
| [RFC4075] | Kalusivalingam, V., “Simple Network Time Protocol (SNTP) Configuration Option for DHCPv6,” RFC 4075, May 2005 (TXT). |
| [RFC4330] | Mills, D., “Simple Network Time Protocol (SNTP) Version 4 for IPv4, IPv6 and OSI,” RFC 4330, January 2006 (TXT). |
| TOC |
| Richard Gayraud | |
| None | |
| Email: | richard.gayraud@free.fr |
| Benoit Lourdelet | |
| Cisco Systems, Inc. | |
| Village ent. GreenSide, Bat T3, | |
| 400, Av de Roumanille, | |
| 06410 BIOT - Sophia-Antipolis Cedex | |
| France | |
| Phone: | +33 4 97 23 26 23 |
| Email: | blourdel@cisco.com |