Payload Working Group | S. Lugan |
Internet-Draft | G. Rouvroy |
Intended status: Standards Track | A. Descampe |
Expires: August 29, 2019 | intoPIX |
T. Richter | |
IIS | |
A. Willeme | |
UCL/ICTEAM | |
February 25, 2019 |
RTP Payload Format for ISO/IEC 21122 (JPEG XS)
draft-ietf-payload-rtp-jpegxs-00
This document specifies a Real-Time Transport Protocol (RTP) payload format to be used for transporting JPEG XS (ISO/IEC 21122) encoded video. JPEG XS is a low-latency, lightweight image coding system allowing for an increased resolution and frame rate, while offering visually lossless quality with reduced amount of resources such as power and bandwidth.
This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79.
Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF). Note that other groups may also distribute working documents as Internet-Drafts. The list of current Internet-Drafts is at https://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/.
Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."
This Internet-Draft will expire on August 29, 2019.
Copyright (c) 2019 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the document authors. All rights reserved.
This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal Provisions Relating to IETF Documents (https://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of publication of this document. Please review these documents carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect to this document. Code Components extracted from this document must include Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as described in the Simplified BSD License.
This document specifies a payload format for packetization of JPEG XS encoded video signals into the Real-time Transport Protocol (RTP).
JPEG XS is a low-latency, lightweight image coding system allowing for an increased resolution and frame rate, while offering visually lossless quality with reduced amount of resources such as power and bandwidth.
The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT", "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described in RFC 2119.
JPEG XS is a low-latency lightweight image coding system for coding continuous-tone grayscale or continuous-tone color digital images.
This coding system provides an efficient representation of image signals through the mathematical tool of wavelet analysis. The wavelet filter process separates each component into multiple bands, where each band consists of multiple coefficients describing the image signal of a given component within a frequency domain specific to the wavelet filter type, i.e. the particular filter corresponding to the band.
Wavelet coefficients are grouped into precincts, where each precinct includes all coefficients over all bands that contribute to a spatial region of the image.
One or multiple precincts are furthermore combined into slices consisting of an integral number of precincts. Precincts do not cross slice boundaries, and wavelet coefficients in precincts that are part of different slices can be decoded independently from each other. Note, however, that the wavelet transformation runs across slice boundaries. A slice always extends over the full width of the image, but may only cover parts of its height.
Multiple contiguous slices are combined into slice groups. Slice groups along with preceding and/or following metadata form fragments. A fragment, and by that the corresponding slice group, is sized such that it is spread over at least two distinct RTP packets, except for the last fragment of an Application Data Unit.
Slice groups within a frame are enumerated from top to bottom by the slice group counter. That is, the first slice group of a frame is slice group #0, and the slice group counter increments by 1 from top to bottom for each slice group, and by that for each fragment.
Figure 1 shows an example of packets, slices, slice groups and fragments. In this Figure, MDT indicates metadata preceding or following slice groups, SlcGrp the slice groups and Slc the slices. As seen there, a fragment may contain more than one slice if the slices are too short to fill up an entire packet, and fragment and packet boundaries need only to align at the start and the end of the ADU. Fragments may extend over more than two packets, depending on their size, but a packet never contains two entire fragments or more. Slice group and fragment boundaries coincide, except for the first and the last fragment, which include additional metadata. Unlike regularly sized packets, the fragment and the slice group size may vary.
<------------------- Application Data Unit (ADU) -------------------> +-----------+-----------+-----------+-----------+-/ /-+-------------+ | Packet #0 | Packet #1 | Packet #2 | Packet #3 | | Packet #n-1 | +-----------+---+-------+-----------+---+-------+-/ /-+-------------+ | Fragment #0 | Fragment #1 | Fragment #m-1 | +---+-----------+-----------------------+---------/ /-----------+---+ |MDT| SlcGrp #0 | SlcGrp #1 | SlcGrp #m-1 | M | +---+-----------+-----------------------+---------/ /-----------+---+ |MDT|Slc#0 Slc#1| Slc #2 | Slc #k-1 | M | +---+-----------+-----------------------+---------/ /-----------+---+
Figure 1: Slice Groups and Fragments
The overall codestream format, including the definition of all markers, is further defined in ISO/IEC 21122-1. It represents sample values of a single frame, bare any interpretation relative to a colorspace.
While the information defined in the codestream is sufficient to reconstruct the sample values of one video frame, the interpretation of the samples remains undefined by the codestream itself. This interpretation, including the color space, frame rate and other information significant to play a JPEG XS stream are contained in the Video Support Box, which precedes each JPEG XS codestream. The syntax of the Video Support Box follows ISO/IEC 15444-1; it consists of multiple subboxes, each with a particular meaning. Its contents, in particular its subboxes are defined in ISO/IEC 21122-3.
This section specifies the payload format for JPEG XS video streams over the Real-time Transport Protocol (RTP).
In order to be transported over RTP, each JPEG XS stream is transported in a distinct RTP stream, identified by a distinct SSRC.
Each of those RTP streams is divided into Application Data Units (ADUs).
Each ADU is split into packets, depending e.g. on the Maximum Transmission unit (MTU) of the network. Every packet shall have the same size, except the last packet of every ADU which could be shorter. Packet boundaries shall coincide with ADU boundaries, i.e. the first (resp. last) byte of an ADU shall be the first (resp. last) byte of an RTP packet payload data.
The following figure illustrates the RTP payload header used in order to transport a JPEG XS stream.
0 1 2 3 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 +---+-+-+-------+-+-------------+-------------------------------+ | V |P|X| CC |M| PT | Sequence number | +---+-+-+-------+-+-------------+-------------------------------+ | Timestamp | +---------------------------------------------------------------+ | Synchronization source (SSRC) identifier | +===============================================================+ | Contributing source (CSRC) identifiers | | .... | +-----+-+-+---------+---------------------+---------------------+ | Ver |f|c| SlcGrp | SlcGrpOffset | Frame counter | +-----+-+-+---------+---------------------+---------------------+ | Data | +---------------------------------------------------------------+
Figure 2: RTP and payload headers
The version (V), padding (P), extension (X), CSRC count (CC), sequence number, synchronization source (SSRC) and contributing source (CSRC) fields follow their respective definitions in RFC 3550.
The timestamp should be based on a globally synchronized 90 kHz clock reference, and should correspond to the number of cycles since the SMPTE Epoch (as per defined in SMPTE ST 2059-1:2015) modulo 2^32:
timestamp = floor(time_since_epoch*90000) % 2^32
where time_since_epoch is the time elapsed since the SMPTE Epoch, expressed in seconds as a real number, and floor indicates rounding to the next lower integer.
As per specified in RFC 3550 and RFC 4175, the RTP timestamp designates the sampling instant of the first octet of the frame to which the RTP packet belongs. Packets shall not include data from multiple frames, and all packets belonging to the same frame shall have the same timestamp. Several successive RTP packets will consequently have equal timestamps if they belong to the same frame (that is until the marker bit is set to 1, marking the last packet of the frame), and the timestamp is only increased when a new frame begins.
If the sampling instant does not correspond to an integer value of the clock, the value shall be truncated to the next lowest integer, with no ambiguity.
The remaining fields are defined as follows:
The payload data of a JPEG XS transport stream consists of a concatenation of multiple JPEG XS Frames.
Each JPEG XS frame is the concatenation of multiple fragments where each fragment contains one and only one slice group. The first fragment of a frame also contains the Video Support box and the JPEG XS header, the last fragment also contains the EOC marker. Figure 3 depicts this layout.
^ +-------------------------------------------+ ^ | | Video Support Box | | | | +-------------------------------------+ | | | | | Sub boxes of the Video Support Box | | | Frag- | +-------------------------------------+ | JPEG ment | : additional sub-boxes of the VE-Box : | XS #0 | +-------------------------------------+ | Header | | | Seg- | +-------------------------------------------+ ment | | JPEG XS Header | | | | +-------------------------------------+ | | | | | SOC Marker | | | | | +-------------------------------------+ | | | | : Additional Marker Segments : | | | | +-------------------------------------+ | | | | | | | +-------------------------------------------+ v | | Slice Group #0 | | | +-------------------------------------+ | | | | Slice #0 of Slice Group #0 | | | | | +-------------------------------+ | | | | | | SLH Marker | | | | | | +-------------------------------+ | | | | | : Entropy Coded Data : | | | | | +-------------------------------+ | | | | +-------------------------------------+ | | | | Slice #1 of Slice Group #0 | | | | : : | | | +-------------------------------------+ | | | | Slice #n-1 of Slice Group #0 | | | | : : | v | +-------------------------------------+ | ^ +-------------------------------------------+ | | Slice Group #1 | Frag- : : ment : : #1 : : | : : v +-------------------------------------------+ : : ^ +-------------------------------------------+ | | Slice Group #n-1 | Frag- : : ment : : #n-1 +-------------------------------------------+ | | EOC Marker | v +-------------------------------------------+
Figure 3: JPEG XS Payload Data
The traffic shaping and delivery timing shall be in accordance with the Network Compatibility Model compliance definitions specified in SMPTE ST 2110-21 for either Narrow Linear Senders (Type NL) or Wide Senders (Type W).
NOTE: The Virtual Receiver Buffer Model compliance definitions of ST 2110-21 do not apply.
Congestion control for RTP SHALL be used in accordance with RFC 3550, and with any applicable RTP profile: e.g., RFC 3551. An additional requirement if best-effort service is being used is users of this payload format MUST monitor packet loss to ensure that the packet loss rate is within acceptable parameters. Circuit Breakers is an update to RTP that defines criteria for when one is required to stop sending RTP Packet Streams and applications implementing this standard MUST comply with it. RFC 8085 provides additional information on the best practices for applying congestion control to UDP streams.
YCbCr-4:4:4 (4:4:4 sampling) YCbCr-4:2:2 (4:2:2 sampling) YCbCr-4:2:0 (4:2:0 sampling)
CLYCbCr-4:4:4 (4:4:4 sampling) CLYCbCr-4:2:2 (4:2:2 sampling) CLYCbCr-4:2:0 (4:2:0 sampling)
ICtCp-4:4:4 (4:4:4 sampling) ICtCp-4:2:2 (4:2:2 sampling) ICtCp-4:2:0 (4:2:0 sampling)
RGB RGB or R' G' B' samples
XYZ X' Y' Z' samples
KEY samples of the key signal
BT601-5 ITU Recommendation BT.601-5 BT709-2 ITU Recommendation BT.709-2 SMPTE240M SMPTE standard 240M BT601 as specified in Recommendation ITU-R BT.601-7 BT709 as specified in Recommendation ITU-R BT.709-6 BT2020 as specified in Recommendation ITU-R BT.2020-2 BT2100 as specified in Recommendation ITU-R BT.2100 Table 2 titled "System colorimetry" ST2065-1 as specified in SMPTE ST 2065-1 Academy Color Encoding Specification (ACES) ST2065-3 as specified for Academy Density Exchange Encoding (ADX) in SMPTE ST 2065-3 XYZ as specified in ISO 11664-1 section titled "1931 Observer"
SDR (Standard Dynamic Range) Video streams of standard dynamic range, that utilize the OETF of Recommendation ITU-R BT.709 or Recommendation ITU-R BT.2020. Such streams shall be assumed to target the EOTF specified in ITU-R BT.1886. PQ Video streams of high dynamic range video that utilize the Perceptual Quantization system of Recommendation ITU-R BT.2100 HLG Video streams of high dynamic range video that utilize the Hybrid Log-Gamma system of Recommendation ITU-R BT.2100
A Session Description Protocol (SDP) object shall be created for each RTP stream and it shall be in accordance with the provisions of SMPTE ST 2110-10.
The information carried in the media type specification has a specific mapping to fields in the Session Description Protocol (SDP), which is commonly used to describe RTP sessions.
The media type ("video") goes in SDP "m=" as the media name.
The media subtype ("jpeg-xs") goes in SDP "a=rtpmap" as the encoding name. The RTP clock rate in "a=rtpmap" MUST be 90000, which for the payload format defined in this document is a 90 kHz clock. The remaining parameters go in the SDP "a=fmtp" attribute by copying them directly from the MIME media type string as a semicolon-separated list of parameter=value pairs.
m=video 30000 RTP/AVP 112 a=rtpmap:112 jpeg-xs/90000 a=fmtp:112 sampling=YCbCr-4:2:2; width=1920; height=1080; depth=10; colorimetry=BT709; TCS=SDR; RANGE=FULL
A sample SDP mapping for JPEG XS video is as follows:
In this example, a dynamic payload type 112 is used for JPEG XS video. The RTP sampling clock is 90 kHz. Note that the "a=fmtp:" line has been wrapped to fit this page, and will be a single long line in the SDP file.
The SDP object shall include the TP parameter and may include the CMAX parameter as specified in SMPTE ST 2110-21.
The following considerations apply when using SDP offer/answer procedures to negotiate the use of the JPEG XS payload in RTP:
This memo requests that IANA registers video/jpeg-xs as specified in Section 6.1. The media type is also requested to be added to the IANA registry for "RTP Payload Format MIME types".
RTP packets using the payload format defined in this specification are subject to the security considerations discussed in the RTP specification and in any applicable RTP profile such as RTP/AVP, RTP/AVPF, RTP/SAVP, or RTP/SAVPF. This implies that confidentiality of the media streams is achieved by encryption.
However, as "Securing the RTP Framework: Why RTP Does Not Mandate a Single Media Security Solution" discusses, it is not an RTP payload format's responsibility to discuss or mandate what solutions are used to meet the basic security goals like confidentiality, integrity, and source authenticity for RTP in general. This responsibility lies on anyone using RTP in an application. They can find guidance on available security mechanisms and important considerations in "Options for Securing RTP Sessions". Applications SHOULD use one or more appropriate strong security mechanisms.
This payload format and the JPEG XS encoding do not exhibit any substantial non-uniformity, either in output or in complexity to perform the decoding operation and thus are unlikely to pose a denial-of-service threat due to the receipt of pathological datagrams.
It is important to note that HD or UHDTV JPEG XS-encoded video can have significant bandwidth requirements (typically more than 1 Gbps for ultra high-definition video, especially if using high framerate). This is sufficient to cause potential for denial-of-service if transmitted onto most currently available Internet paths.
Accordingly, if best-effort service is being used, users of this payload format MUST monitor packet loss to ensure that the packet loss rate is within acceptable parameters. Packet loss is considered acceptable if a TCP flow across the same network path, and experiencing the same network conditions, would achieve an average throughput, measured on a reasonable timescale, that is not less than the RTP flow is achieving. This condition can be satisfied by implementing congestion control mechanisms to adapt the transmission rate (or the number of layers subscribed for a layered multicast session), or by arranging for a receiver to leave the session if the loss rate is unacceptably high.
This payload format may also be used in networks that provide quality-of-service guarantees. If enhanced service is being used, receivers SHOULD monitor packet loss to ensure that the service that was requested is actually being delivered. If it is not, then they SHOULD assume that they are receiving best-effort service and behave accordingly.
Note to RFC Editor: This section may be removed after carrying out all the instructions of this section.
RFC XXXX is to be replaced by the RFC number this specification receives when published.