Network Working Group | J. Gould |
Internet-Draft | VeriSign, Inc. |
Intended status: Standards Track | July 5, 2016 |
Expires: January 6, 2017 |
Extensible Provisioning Protocol (EPP) and Registration Data Access Protocol (RDAP) Status Mapping
draft-ietf-regext-epp-rdap-status-mapping-01
This document describes the mapping of the Extensible Provisioning Protocol (EPP) statuses with the statuses registered for use in the Registration Data Access Protocol (RDAP). This document identifies gaps in the mapping, and registers RDAP statuses to fill the gaps to ensure that all of the EPP RFC statuses are supported in RDAP.
This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79.
Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF). Note that other groups may also distribute working documents as Internet-Drafts. The list of current Internet-Drafts is at http://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/.
Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."
This Internet-Draft will expire on January 6, 2017.
Copyright (c) 2016 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the document authors. All rights reserved.
This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal Provisions Relating to IETF Documents (http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of publication of this document. Please review these documents carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect to this document. Code Components extracted from this document must include Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as described in the Simplified BSD License.
This document maps the statuses defined in the Extensible Provisioning Protocol (EPP) RFCs to the list of statuses registered for use in the Registration Data Access Protocol (RDAP), in the RDAP JSON Values Registry [rdap-json-values].
The RDAP JSON Values Registry is described in section 10.2 of [RFC7483] and is available in the RDAP JSON Values Registry [rdap-json-values].
The EPP statuses used as the source of the mapping include section 2.3 of the EPP Domain Name Mapping [RFC5731], section 2.3 of the EPP Host Mapping [RFC5732], section 2.2 of the EPP Contact Mapping [RFC5733], and section 3.1 of EPP Grace Period Mapping [RFC3915].
Each EPP status MUST map to a single RDAP status to ensure that data in the Domain Name Registries (DNRs) that use EPP can be accurately presented in RDAP.
The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT", "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described in RFC 2119 [RFC2119].
Below is an alphabetically sorted list of EPP statuses from the EPP RFCs ([RFC5731], [RFC5732], [RFC5733], and [RFC3915]) mapped to the RDAP statuses registered in the RDAP JSON Values Registry [rdap-json-values], with the format <EPP Status> '=' <RDAP Status>, where a blank <RDAP Status> indicates a gap in the mapping.
The RDAP JSON Values Registry [rdap-json-values] does have a set of prohibited statuses including "renew prohibited", "update prohibited", "transfer prohibited", and "delete prohibited", but these statuses do not directly map to the EPP prohibited statuses. The EPP prohibited statuses reflect both what is prohibited ("renew", "update", "transfer", "delete") and who set ("client" or "server") and can clear the status. In the DNR, the client and server prohibited statuses are separate and RDAP MUST support the same separation.
Each of the EPP status values that don't map directly to an RDAP status value is described below. Each EPP status value includes a proposed new RDAP status value and a description of the value. The RDAP status value is derived from the EPP status value by converting the EPP camel case representation to lower case with a space character inserted between word boundaries.
The resulting mapping after registering the new RDAP statuses is:
The following values should be registered by the IANA in the RDAP JSON Values Registry described in [RFC7483]:
Value: add period
Type: status
Description: For DNR that indicates if the object is deleted by the registrar during this period, the registry provides a credit to the registrar for the cost of the registration.
Registrant Name: IESG
Registrant Contact Information: iesg@ietf.org
Value: auto renew period
Type: status
Description: For DNR that indicates if the object is deleted by the registrar during this period, the registry provides a credit to the registrar for the cost of the auto renewal.
Registrant Name: IESG
Registrant Contact Information: iesg@ietf.org
Value: client delete prohibited
Type: status
Description: For DNR that indicates the client requested that requests to delete the object MUST be rejected.
Registrant Name: IESG
Registrant Contact Information: iesg@ietf.org
Value: client hold
Type: status
Description: For DNR that indicates the client requested that the DNS delegation information MUST NOT be published for the object.
Registrant Name: IESG
Registrant Contact Information: iesg@ietf.org
Value: client renew prohibited
Type: status
Description: For DNR that indicates the client requested that requests to renew the object MUST be rejected.
Registrant Name: IESG
Registrant Contact Information: iesg@ietf.org
Value: client transfer prohibited
Type: status
Description: For DNR that indicates the client requested that requests to transfer the object MUST be rejected.
Registrant Name: IESG
Registrant Contact Information: iesg@ietf.org
Value: client update prohibited
Type: status
Description: For DNR that indicates the client requested that requests to update the object (other than to remove this status) MUST be rejected.
Registrant Name: IESG
Registrant Contact Information: iesg@ietf.org
Value: pending restore
Type: status
Description: For DNR that indicates a object is in the process of being restored after being in the redemptionPeriod state.
Registrant Name: IESG
Registrant Contact Information: iesg@ietf.org
Value: redemption period
Type: status
Description: For DNR that indicates a delete has been received, but the object has not yet been purged because an opportunity exists to restore the object and abort the deletion process.
Registrant Name: IESG
Registrant Contact Information: iesg@ietf.org
Value: renew period
Type: status
Description: For DNR that indicates if the object is deleted by the registrar during this period, the registry provides a credit to the registrar for the cost of the renewal.
Registrant Name: IESG
Registrant Contact Information: iesg@ietf.org
Value: server delete prohibited
Type: status
Description: For DNR that indicates the server set the status so that requests to delete the object MUST be rejected.
Registrant Name: IESG
Registrant Contact Information: iesg@ietf.org
Value: server renew prohibited
Type: status
Description: For DNR that indicates the server set the status so that requests to renew the object MUST be rejected.
Registrant Name: IESG
Registrant Contact Information: iesg@ietf.org
Value: server transfer prohibited
Type: status
Description: For DNR that indicates the server set the status so that requests to transfer the object MUST be rejected.
Registrant Name: IESG
Registrant Contact Information: iesg@ietf.org
Value: server update prohibited
Type: status
Description: For DNR that indicates the server set the status so that requests to update the object (other than to remove this status) MUST be rejected.
Registrant Name: IESG
Registrant Contact Information: iesg@ietf.org
Value: server hold
Type: status
Description: For DNR that indicates the server set the status so that DNS delegation information MUST NOT be published for the object.
Registrant Name: IESG
Registrant Contact Information: iesg@ietf.org
Value: transfer period
Type: status
Description: For DNR that indicates if the domain name is deleted by the registrar during this period, the registry provides a credit to the registrar for the cost of the transfer.
Registrant Name: IESG
Registrant Contact Information: iesg@ietf.org
The status values described in this document can be subject to server-side information disclosure policies that restrict display of the values to authorized clients. Implementers may wish to review [RFC7481] for a description of the RDAP security services that can be used to implement information disclosure policies.
Suggestions that have been incorporated into this document were provided by Andrew Newton, Scott Hollenbeck, Jim Galvin, and Gustavo Lozano.