Softwire WG | M. Boucadair |
Internet-Draft | Orange |
Intended status: Standards Track | J. Qin |
Expires: August 29, 2016 | Cisco |
T. Tsou | |
Huawei Technologies (USA) | |
X. Deng | |
The University of New South Wales | |
February 26, 2016 |
DHCPv6 Option for IPv4-Embedded Multicast and Unicast IPv6 Prefixes
draft-ietf-softwire-multicast-prefix-option-10
This document defines Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol version 6 (DHCPv6) Option for multicast IPv4 service continuity solutions, aiming to convey the IPv6 prefixes to be used to build unicast and multicast IPv4-embedded IPv6 addresses.
This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79.
Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF). Note that other groups may also distribute working documents as Internet-Drafts. The list of current Internet-Drafts is at http://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/.
Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."
This Internet-Draft will expire on August 29, 2016.
Copyright (c) 2016 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the document authors. All rights reserved.
This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal Provisions Relating to IETF Documents (http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of publication of this document. Please review these documents carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect to this document. Code Components extracted from this document must include Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as described in the Simplified BSD License.
Several solutions (e.g., [I-D.ietf-softwire-dslite-multicast]) are proposed for the delivery of multicast services in the context of transition to IPv6. Even if these solutions may have different applicable use cases, they all use specific IPv6 addresses to embed IPv4 addresses, for both multicast group, and multicast source addresses.
This document defines a DHCPv6 option [RFC3315] to convey the IPv6 prefixes to be used for constructing these IPv4-embedded IPv6 addresses.
This option can be in particular used in the context of DS-Lite [RFC6333], Stateless A+P [RFC6346], and other IPv4-IPv6 transition techniques.
The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT", "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described in RFC 2119 [RFC2119].
This document makes use of the following terms:
OPTION_V6_PREFIX64 (Figure 1) conveys the IPv6 prefix(es) to be used (e.g., by a mB4 [I-D.ietf-softwire-dslite-multicast]) to synthesize IPv4-embedded IPv6 addresses.
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | OPTION_V6_PREFIX64 | option-length | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | asm-length | | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ : : ASM_PREFIX64 (Variable) : +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | ssm-length | | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ : : SSM_PREFIX64 (Variable) : +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | unicast-length| | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ : : U_PREFIX64 (Variable) : +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
Figure 1: DHCPv6 Option Format for PREFIX64
The fields of the option shown in Figure 1 are as follows:
DHCP servers supporting OPTION_V6_PREFIX64 should be configured with U_PREFIX64 and at least one ASM_PREFIX64 or one SSM_PREFIX64.
When ASM_PREFIX64 and SSM_PREFIX64 are configured, the length of these prefixes must be /96.
Both ASM_PREFIX64 and SSM_PREFIX64 may be configured and therefore be returned to a requesting DHCP client; it is deployment-specific. In particular, if both SSM and ASM modes are supported, ASM_PREFIX64 and SSM_PREFIX64 prefixes must be configured. For SSM deployments, both SSM_PREFIX64 and U_PREFIX64 should be configured.
To retrieve the IPv6 prefixes that will be used to synthesize unicast and multicast IPv4-embedded IPv6 addresses, the DHCPv6 client MUST include OPTION_V6_PREFIX64 in its OPTION_ORO. If the DHCPv6 client receives more than one OPTION_V6_PREFIX64 option from the DHCPv6 server:
If asm-length, ssm-length and unicast-length fields are all set to 0, the DHCPv6 client MUST behave as if OPTION_V6_PREFIX64 had not been received in the response received from the DHCPv6 server.
If the asm-length field is non-null, the IPv6 prefix identified by ASM_PREFIX64 is used to synthesize IPv4-embedded IPv6 multicast addresses in the ASM range. This is achieved by concatenating the ASM_PREFIX64 and the IPv4 multicast address; the Pv4 multicast address is inserted in the last 32 bits of the IPv4-embedded IPv6 multicast address.
If the ssm-length field is non-null, the IPv6 prefix identified by SSM_PREFIX64 is used to synthesize IPv4-embedded IPv6 multicast addresses in the SSM range. This is achieved by concatenating the SSM_PREFIX64 and the IPv4 multicast address; the Pv4 multicast address is inserted in the last 32 bits of the IPv4-embedded IPv6 multicast address.
If the unicast-length field is non-null, the IPv6 prefix identified by U_PREFIX64 field is used to synthesize IPv4-embedded IPv6 unicast addresses as specified in [RFC6052].
The security considerations documented in [RFC3315] and [RFC6052] are to be considered.
Particular thanks to C. Jacquenet, S. Venaas, B. Volz, and T. Taylor for their review.
Authors of this document request IANA to assign a new DHCPv6 option in the registry maintained in http://www.iana.org/assignments/dhcpv6-parameters:
Option Name Value ----------------- ----- OPTION_V6_PREFIX64 TBA
[RFC2119] | Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, DOI 10.17487/RFC2119, March 1997. |
[RFC3315] | Droms, R., Bound, J., Volz, B., Lemon, T., Perkins, C. and M. Carney, "Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol for IPv6 (DHCPv6)", RFC 3315, DOI 10.17487/RFC3315, July 2003. |
[RFC4607] | Holbrook, H. and B. Cain, "Source-Specific Multicast for IP", RFC 4607, DOI 10.17487/RFC4607, August 2006. |
[RFC6052] | Bao, C., Huitema, C., Bagnulo, M., Boucadair, M. and X. Li, "IPv6 Addressing of IPv4/IPv6 Translators", RFC 6052, DOI 10.17487/RFC6052, October 2010. |
[I-D.ietf-softwire-dslite-multicast] | Qin, J., Boucadair, M., Jacquenet, C., Lee, Y. and Q. Wang, "Delivery of IPv4 Multicast Services to IPv4 Clients over an IPv6 Multicast Network", Internet-Draft draft-ietf-softwire-dslite-multicast-10, August 2015. |
[RFC6333] | Durand, A., Droms, R., Woodyatt, J. and Y. Lee, "Dual-Stack Lite Broadband Deployments Following IPv4 Exhaustion", RFC 6333, DOI 10.17487/RFC6333, August 2011. |
[RFC6346] | Bush, R., "The Address plus Port (A+P) Approach to the IPv4 Address Shortage", RFC 6346, DOI 10.17487/RFC6346, August 2011. |