IETF ForCES Logical Function Block (LFB) Subsidiary Management
draft-khs-forces-lfb-subsidiary-management-00.txt

Abstract

This document discusses ForCES Logical Function Block (LFB) Subsidiary Management (SM). Note that LFB SM is useful for introducing and supporting virtualization of ForCES Network Element (NE) including control Element (CE) and Forwarding Element (FE).

Status of This Memo

This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79.

Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF). Note that other groups may also distribute working documents as Internet-Drafts. The list of current Internet-Drafts is at http://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/.

Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."

This Internet-Draft will expire on August 14, 2014.

Copyright Notice

Copyright (c) 2014 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the document authors. All rights reserved.

This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal Provisions Relating to IETF Documents (http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of publication of this document. Please review these documents carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect to this document. Code Components extracted from this document must include Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as described in the Simplified BSD License.

Table of Contents

• 1. Introduction
• 1.1. Scope
• 1.2. Abbreviations
• 1.3. Conventions and Definitions
• 2. Use of Virtualized ForCES Elements
• 2.1. Use of Virtualized CEs
• 2.2. Use of Virtualized FEs
• 3. Potential Scenarios
• 3.1. Recovery from CE failure
• 3.2. Recovery from FE failure
• 3.3. Load Balancing
• 3.4. Scalable/Robust Service Function Chaining
• 3.5. Orchestration
• 3.6. Generic LFB Lifecycle Management
• 3.6.1. Booting a CE/FE
• 3.6.2. Bootstrapping the Configuration
• 3.6.3. Runtime Management
• 4. Testbed Platform
• 5. Reference Implementation
• 6. FEM Library
• 6.1. Frame Definitions
• 6.2. Datatype Definitions
• 6.3. Metadata Definitions
• 6.4. FEM
• 6.4.1. Data Handling
• 6.4.2. Components
• 6.4.3. Capabilities
• 6.4.4. Events
• 7. XML for FEM LFB
• 8. Security Considerations
• 9. IANA Considerations
• 9.1. LFB Class Names and LFB Class Identifiers
• 10. Acknowledgments
• 11. References
• 11.1. Normative References
• 11.2. Informative References
• Authors' Addresses

1. Introduction

This document discusses ForCES Logical Function Block (LFB) Subsidiary Management (SM). Note that LFB SM is useful for introducing and supporting virtualization of ForCES Network Element (NE) including control Element (CE) and Network Element (NE).

Deployment experience has demonstrated the value of using ForCES to control the Forwarding Element Manager (FEM) by creating an LFB to represent its function using the same encoding rules as for any other LFB. This allows it to be controlled by the same Control Element (CE).

This work item assumes the presence of an initially booted FE whose configuration could then be updated at runtime via an FEM LFB for runtime config purposes (e.g., by adding a new CE and its associated IP address).

This work item can also be useful in addressing control of virtual FEs where individual FEM Managers can be addressed to control the creation, configuration, and resource assignment of such virtual FEs within a physical FE. This work would result in a standards track LFB FEM library RFC.

1.1. Scope

The scope of this document is discussion (and standardization) of utilizing virtualized NEs (VNEs)for virtual CEs (VCEs) and virtual FEs (VFEs).

The currently existing techniques and solutions may be either slow or not directly applicable to ForCES LFB subsidiary management.

1.2. Abbreviations

• API: Application Programming Interface
• CE: Control Element
• CEM: CE Manager
• CEV: CE Visor
• FE: Forwarding Element
• FEM: FE Manager
• FEV: FE Visor
• ForCES: Forwarding and Control Element Separation
• LFB: Logical Functional Block
• NE: Network Element
• PL: Protocol Layer
• SFC: Service Function Chaining
• VCE: Virtual CE
• VFE: Virtual FE
• VNE: Virtual NE

1.3. Conventions and Definitions

The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT", "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described in [RFC2119].

The following definitions are taken from [RFC3654], [RFC3746] and [RFC5810]. They are repeated here for convenience as needed, but the normative definitions are found in the referenced RFCs:

• Logical Functional Block (LFB) -- A template that represents a fine-grained, logically separate aspects of FE processing.
• Forwarding Element (FE) - A logical entity that implements the ForCES Protocol. FEs use the underlying hardware to provide per-packet processing and handling as directed by a CE via the ForCES Protocol.
• Control Element (CE) - A logical entity that implements the ForCES Protocol and uses it to instruct one or more FEs on how to process packets. CEs handle functionality such as the execution of control and signaling protocols.
• ForCES Network Element (NE) - An entity composed of one or more CEs and one or more FEs. An NE usually hides its internal organization from external entities and represents a single point of management to entities outside the NE.
• FE Manager (FEM) - A logical entity that operates in the pre-association phase and is responsible for determining to which CE(s) an FE should communicate. This process is called CE discovery and may involve the FE manager learning the capabilities of available CEs.
• CE Manager - A logical entity that operates in the pre-association phase and is responsible for determining to which FE(s) a CE should communicate. This process is called FE discovery and may involve the CE manager learning the capabilities of available FEs.
• ForCES Protocol -- The protocol used for communication communication between CEs and FEs. This protocol does not apply to CE-to-CE communication, FE-to-FE communication, or to communication between FE and CE managers. The ForCES protocol is a master-slave protocol in which FEs are slaves and CEs are masters. This protocol includes both the management of the communication channel (e.g., connection establishment, heartbeats) and the control messages themselves.
• ForCES Protocol Layer (ForCES PL) -- A layer in the ForCES protocol architecture that defines the ForCES protocol messages, the protocol state transfer scheme, and the ForCES protocol architecture itself (including requirements of ForCES TML as shown below). Specifications of ForCES PL are defined in [RFC5810]
• ForCES Protocol Transport Mapping Layer (ForCES TML) -- A layer in ForCES protocol architecture that specifically addresses the protocol message transportation issues, such as how the protocol messages are mapped to different transport media (like SCTP, IP, TCP, UDP, ATM, Ethernet, etc), and how to achieve and implement reliability, security, etc.

2. Use of Virtualized ForCES Elements

Virtualization of ForCES Elements allows efficient, scalabl, and robust utilization of network control and transmission resources. Virtualization has been discussed (and deployed) widely in the Computing Industry (e.g., server) in the context of efficient utilization of server resources.

As mentioned before, the currently existing techniques and solutions may be either slow or not directly applicable to ForCES LFB subsidiary management.

2.1. Use of Virtualized CEs

In this section we discuss the use of virtualized ForCES control elements (CEs). The resulting operating entities in virtualized environment are Virtual CEs of VCEs. The CE Visor (CEV) has the visiblity to all of the VCEs in a domain, and can assign one of the VCEs as primary Master-VCE and another as secondary Master-VCE. CEV can dynamically manage the role of primary and secondary master-VCEs from a pool of VCEs.

2.2. Use of Virtualized FEs

In this section we discuss the use of virtualized ForCES forwarding elements (FEs). The resulting operating entities in virtualized environment are Virtual FEs of VFEs. The FE Visor (FEV) has the visiblity to all of the VFEs in a domain, and can assign one of the VFEs as primary Master-VFE and another as secondary Master-VFE. FEV can dynamically manage the role of primary and secondary master-VFEs from a pool of VFEs.

3. Potential Scenarios

In this section we discuss a few potential scenarios that can utilize ForCES LFB subsidiary management for efficient and robust operation of networks withut using excessive additional resources.

3.1. Recovery from CE failure

In this section we discuss how virtualization of CEs can be used for efiicient recovery from CE failure(s).

3.2. Recovery from FE failure

In this section we discuss how virtualization of FEs can be used for efiicient recovery from FE failure(s).

3.3. Load Balancing

In this section we discuss efficient load balancing of both CE and FE in virtualized environment.

3.4. Scalable/Robust Service Function Chaining

In this section we discuss how LFB subsidiary management can contribute to the robust/scalable implementation of Service Function Chaining (SFC).

3.5. Orchestration

In this section we discuss efficient Orchestration of both CE and FE in virtualized multi-admin-domain environment.

3.6. Generic LFB Lifecycle Management

In this section we discuss generic lifecycle management of subsidiaries of LFBs in virtualized environment(s). The typical management activities in the life of FE/CE are discussed in the following sub-sections.

3.6.1. Booting a CE/FE

When an entity needs to boot a CE/FE, if this is a VM, some orchestration would scheme/plan to do this. In case of ForCES, we have a control App that boots a CE or an FE via a management FE. So here we have a management plane details that is described either in FEM or other LFB.

3.6.2. Bootstrapping the Configuration

The FE, e.g., the VM whihc has just been booted, as described in teh previous sub-section, needs initial bootstrap configuration (e.g., what CEs to connect to etc). This clearly falls in the FEM LFB domain.

3.6.3. Runtime Management

At runtime of the FE, for example, the management could introduce a new CE for the FE to associate with; it may also be for an FE to dissociate from a CE, and so on.

4. Testbed Platform

TBD.

5. Reference Implementation

TBD.

6. FEM Library

6.1. Frame Definitions

This LFB does not define any frames

6.2. Datatype Definitions

This library defines the following datatypes.

6.3. Metadata Definitions

This LFB does not define any metadata definition

6.4. FEM

The LFB is an LFB that standardizes and assists creation of NEs.

6.4.1. Data Handling

The FEM LFB does not handle any packets. It's function is to subsidize creation of NEs. A CE or a CEM will request from the FEM the creation of the NE, it will provide the requirements, e.g. FEs, LFBs in FEs etc..., and depending on the implementation the FEM may create these FE instances, or if these instances exist, provide the bootstrap information to FEs how and where to connect to the CEs.

6.4.2. Components

This LFB has only one component specified. The NEs component, is a component that contains all the Network Elements this FEM is responsible for maintaining. It is a table and each row is a struct of the NEID, a uint32 and an array of FE parameters.

6.4.3. Capabilities

This LFB has no Capabilities specified.

6.4.4. Events

This LFB has three events specified. These events notify the CE whether an NE has been added, deleted or changed. The event report is the NEs row that created the event.

7. XML for FEM LFB

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<LFBLibrary xmlns="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:forces:lfbmodel:1.0"
   xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" provides="FEM">
   <load library="FEPO"/>
   <dataTypeDefs>
      <dataTypeDef>
         <name>IPs</name>
         <synopsis>IP definition</synopsis>
         <struct>
            <component componentID="1">
               <name>FEIPv4</name>
               <synopsis>The FEs IPv4</synopsis>
               <typeRef>byte[4]</typeRef>
            </component>
            <component componentID="2">
               <name>FEIPv6</name>
               <synopsis>The FEs IPv6</synopsis>
               <typeRef>byte[16]</typeRef>
            </component>
         </struct>
      </dataTypeDef>
      <dataTypeDef>
         <name>LFBDefs</name>
         <synopsis>LFB parameters inside the FE</synopsis>
         <struct>
            <component componentID="1">
               <name>LFBClassID</name>
               <synopsis>The LFB CLass ID</synopsis>
               <typeRef>uint32</typeRef>
            </component>
            <component componentID="2">
               <name>LFBVersion</name>
               <synopsis>The Version of the LFB</synopsis>
               <typeRef>string</typeRef>
            </component>
            <component componentID="3">
               <name>LFBName</name>
               <synopsis>The name of the LFB</synopsis>
               <optional/>
               <typeRef>string</typeRef>
            </component>
         </struct>
      </dataTypeDef>
      <dataTypeDef>
         <name>CEParams</name>
         <synopsis>CE parameters</synopsis>
         <struct>
            <component componentID="1">
               <name>CEID</name>
               <synopsis>The CE ID</synopsis>
               <typeRef>uint32</typeRef>
            </component>
            <component componentID="2">
               <name>CEIP</name>
               <synopsis>The CEIP</synopsis>
               <array>
                  <typeRef>IPs</typeRef>
               </array>
            </component>
         </struct>
      </dataTypeDef>
      <dataTypeDef>
         <name>FEParams</name>
         <synopsis>FE parameters</synopsis>
         <struct>
            <component componentID="1">
               <name>FEID</name>
               <synopsis>The FEID</synopsis>
               <typeRef>uint32</typeRef>
            </component>
            <component componentID="2">
               <name>FEIP</name>
               <synopsis>The FE's IP</synopsis>
               <array>
                   <typeRef>IPs</typeRef>
               </array>
            </component>
            <component componentID="3">
               <name>LFBparameters</name>
               <synopsis>The LFBs in this FE</synopsis>
               <array>
                  <typeRef>LFBDefs</typeRef>
               </array>
            </component>
            <component componentID="4">
               <name>CEs</name>
               <synopsis>The CEs that should be associated with this
                  FE</synopsis>
               <array>
                  <typeRef>CEParams</typeRef>
               </array>
            </component>
         </struct>
      </dataTypeDef>
   </dataTypeDefs>
   <LFBClassDefs>
      <LFBClassDef LFBClassID="21">
         <name>FEM</name>
         <synopsis>The Forwarding Element Manager LFB</synopsis>
         <version>1.0</version>
         <components>
            <component componentID="1" access="read-write">
               <name>NEs</name>
               <synopsis>All the Network Elements this FEM is
                  responsible for maintaining</synopsis>
               <array>
                  <struct>
                     <component componentID="1">
                        <name>NEID</name>
                        <synopsis>ID of the Network Element</synopsis>
                        <typeRef>uint32</typeRef>
                     </component>
                     <component componentID="2">
                        <name>FEs</name>
                        <synopsis>FEs in the Network Element
                        </synopsis>
                        <array>
                           <typeRef>FEParams</typeRef>
                        </array>
                     </component>
                  </struct>
               </array>
            </component>
         </components>
         <events baseID="10">
            <event eventID="1">
               <name>NEchanged</name>
               <synopsis>The NE definition has changed</synopsis>
               <eventTarget>
                  <eventField>NEs</eventField>
               </eventTarget>
               <eventChanged/>
               <eventReports>
                  <eventReport>
                     <eventField>NEs</eventField>
                     <eventSubscript>_NEsrowid_</eventSubscript>
                  </eventReport>
               </eventReports>
            </event>
            <event eventID="2">
               <name>NEcreated</name>
               <synopsis>An NE has been created</synopsis>
               <eventTarget>
                  <eventField>NEs</eventField>
               </eventTarget>
               <eventCreated/>
               <eventReports>
                  <eventReport>
                     <eventField>NEs</eventField>
                     <eventSubscript>_NEsrowid_</eventSubscript>
                  </eventReport>
               </eventReports>
            </event>
            <event eventID="3">
               <name>NEdeleted</name>
               <synopsis>An NE has been deleted</synopsis>
               <eventTarget>
                  <eventField>NEs</eventField>
               </eventTarget>
               <eventDeleted/>
               <eventReports>
                  <eventReport>
                     <eventField>NEs</eventField>
                     <eventSubscript>_NEsrowid_</eventSubscript>
                  </eventReport>
               </eventReports>
            </event>
         </events>
      </LFBClassDef>
   </LFBClassDefs>
</LFBLibrary>