PCE Working Group | C. Li |
Internet-Draft | Huawei Technologies |
Intended status: Standards Track | S. Sivabalan |
Expires: September 9, 2019 | Cisco Systems, Inc. |
March 08, 2019 |
A YANG Data Model for Segment Routing in IPv6 (SRv6) support in Path Computation Element Communications Protocol (PCEP)
draft-li-pce-pcep-srv6-yang-00
This document augments a YANG data model for the management of Path Computation Element communications Protocol (PCEP) for communications between a Path Computation Client (PCC) and a Path Computation Element (PCE), or between two PCEs in support for Segment Routing in IPv6. The data model includes configuration data and state data (status information and counters for the collection of statistics).
This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79.
Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF). Note that other groups may also distribute working documents as Internet-Drafts. The list of current Internet-Drafts is at https://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/.
Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."
This Internet-Draft will expire on September 9, 2019.
Copyright (c) 2019 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the document authors. All rights reserved.
This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal Provisions Relating to IETF Documents (https://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of publication of this document. Please review these documents carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect to this document. Code Components extracted from this document must include Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as described in the Simplified BSD License.
The Path Computation Element (PCE) defined in [RFC4655] is an entity that is capable of computing a network path or route based on a network graph, and applying computational constraints. A Path Computation Client (PCC) may make requests to a PCE for paths to be computed.
PCEP is the communication protocol between a PCC and PCE and is defined in [RFC5440]. PCEP interactions include path computation requests and path computation replies as well as notifications of specific states related to the use of a PCE in the context of Multiprotocol Label Switching (MPLS) and Generalized MPLS (GMPLS) Traffic Engineering (TE). [RFC8231] specifies extensions to PCEP to enable stateful control of MPLS TE LSPs.
[I-D.negi-pce-segment-routing-ipv6] extends [I-D.ietf-pce-segment-routing] to support SR for IPv6 data plane.
[I-D.ietf-pce-pcep-yang] defines a YANG [RFC7950] data model for the management of PCEP speakers. This document contains a specification of the PCEP-SRv6 YANG module, "ietf-pcep-srv6" which provides the PCEP-SRv6 [I-D.negi-pce-segment-routing-ipv6] data model.
The PCEP operational state is included in the same tree as the PCEP configuration consistent with Network Management Datastore Architecture [RFC8342]. The origin of the data is indicated as per the origin metadata annotation.
The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT", "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "NOT RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described in BCP 14 [RFC2119] [RFC8174] when, and only when, they appear in all capitals, as shown here.
This document also uses the following terms defined in [RFC7420]:
Further, this document also uses the following terms defined in [RFC8231] :
[I-D.ietf-pce-segment-routing] :
[I-D.negi-pce-segment-routing-ipv6] :
A simplified graphical representation of the data model is used in this document. The meaning of the symbols in these diagrams is defined in [RFC8340].
In this document, names of data nodes and other data model objects are often used without a prefix, as long as it is clear from the context in which YANG module each name is defined. Otherwise, names are prefixed using the standard prefix associated with the corresponding YANG module, as shown in Table 1.
Prefix | YANG module | Reference |
---|---|---|
te-types | ietf-te-types | [I-D.ietf-teas-yang-te] |
p | ietf-pcep | [I-D.ietf-pce-pcep-yang] |
st | ietf-srv6-types | [I-D.raza-spring-srv6-yang] |
module: ietf-pcep-srv6 augment /p:pcep/p:entity/p:capability: +--rw srv6 {srv6}? +--rw enabled? boolean +--rw msd-limit? boolean +--rw srv6-msd* [msd-type] +--rw msd-type uint8 +--rw msd-value? uint8 augment /p:pcep/p:entity/p:peers/p:peer/p:capability: +--rw srv6 {srv6}? +--rw enabled? boolean +--rw msd-limit? boolean +--rw srv6-msd* [msd-type] +--rw msd-type uint8 +--rw msd-value? uint8 augment /p:pcep/p:entity/p:lsp-db/p:lsp: +--ro srv6 {srv6}? +--ro segment-list +--ro segment* [index] +--ro index uint32 +--ro sid-value? st:srv6-sid
The PCEP-SRv6 YANG module defined in this document has all the common building blocks for the PCEP-SRv6 extension.
RFC Ed.: In this section, replace all occurrences of 'XXXX' with the actual RFC number and all occurrences of the revision date below with the date of RFC publication (and remove this note).
<CODE BEGINS> file "ietf-pcep-srv6@2019-03-08.yang" module ietf-pcep-srv6 { yang-version 1.1; namespace "urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-pcep-srv6"; prefix ps; import ietf-srv6-types { prefix "st"; reference "RFC XXXX"; } import ietf-te-types { prefix "te-types"; reference "RFC XXXX"; } import ietf-pcep { prefix "p"; reference "RFC XXXX"; } organization "IETF PCE (Path Computation Element) Working Group"; contact "WG Web: <http://tools.ietf.org/wg/pce/> WG List: <mailto:pce@ietf.org> Editor: Cheng Li <mailto:chengli13@huawei.com>"; description "The YANG module augments the PCEP yang operational model with SRv6"; revision 2019-03-08 { description "Initial revision."; reference "RFC XXXX: A YANG Data Model for Path Computation Element Communications Protocol (PCEP) - Segement Routing in IPv6 (SRv6)"; } /* Identity */ identity path-setup-srv6 { base te-types:path-signaling-type; description "SRv6 path setup type"; } /* Features */ feature srv6 { description "Support Segment Routing in IPv6 (SRv6) for PCE."; } /* Groupings */ grouping srv6-msd { description "SRv6 MSD"; leaf msd-type { type uint8; description "SRv6 Maximum Segment Depth (MSD) Type"; } leaf msd-value { type uint8; description "SRv6 MSD value for the type"; } } grouping srv6 { description "SRv6"; container srv6 { if-feature srv6; description "If SRv6 is supported"; leaf enabled{ type boolean; description "Enabled or Disabled"; } leaf msd-limit { type boolean; default false; description "True indicates no limit on MSD, the list srv6-msd is ignored"; } list srv6-msd { key "msd-type"; description "list of SRv6 MSD"; uses srv6-msd; } } } grouping segment-list { description "Segment list grouping"; container segment-list { description "Segments for given segment list"; list segment { key "index"; description "Configure Segment/hop at the index"; uses segment-properties; } } } grouping segment-properties { description "Segment properties grouping"; leaf index { type uint32; description "Segment index"; } leaf sid-value { type st:srv6-sid; description "SRv6 SID value"; } } /* * Augment modules to add SRv6 */ augment "/p:pcep/p:entity/p:capability"{ description "Augmenting SRv6"; uses srv6; } augment "/p:pcep/p:entity/p:peers/p:peer/p:capability"{ description "Augmenting SRv6"; uses srv6; } augment "/p:pcep/p:entity/p:lsp-db/p:lsp"{ description "Augmenting SRv6"; container srv6 { when "/p:pcep/p:entity/p:lsp-db/p:lsp/p:pst = ps:path-setup-srv6" { description "For SRv6 path"; } if-feature srv6; uses segment-list; description "SRv6"; } } }//module <CODE ENDS>
The YANG module defined in this document is designed to be accessed via network management protocol such as NETCONF [RFC6241] or RESTCONF [RFC8040]. The lowest NETCONF layer is the secure transport layer and the mandatory-to-implement secure transport is SSH [RFC6242]. The lowest RESTCONF layer is HTTPS, and the mandatory-to-implement secure transport is TLS [RFC8446]
The NETCONF access control model [RFC8341] provides the means to restrict access for particular NETCONF or RESTCONF users to a pre-configured subset of all available NETCONF or RESTCONF protocol operations and content.
There are a number of data nodes defined in the YANG module which are writable/creatable/deletable (i.e., config true, which is the default). These data nodes may be considered sensitive or vulnerable in some network environments. Write operations (e.g., <edit-config>) to these data nodes without proper protection can have a negative effect on network operations. These are the subtrees and data nodes and their sensitivity/vulnerability:
Unauthorized access to above list can adversely affect the PCEP session between the local entity and the peers. This may lead to inability to compute new paths, stateful operations on the delegated as well as PCE-initiated LSPs.
Some of the readable data nodes in this YANG module may be considered sensitive or vulnerable in some network environments. It is thus important to control read access (e.g., via get, get-config, or notification) to these data nodes. These are the subtrees and data nodes and their sensitivity/vulnerability:
This document registers a URI in the "IETF XML Registry" [RFC3688]. Following the format in RFC 3688, the following registration has been made.
Name: ietf-pcep Namespace: urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-pcep-srv6 Prefix: ps Reference: This I-D
This document registers a YANG module in the "YANG Module Names" registry [RFC6020].
The authors would like to thank Dhruv Dhody for the initial YANG model.
[RFC4655] | Farrel, A., Vasseur, J. and J. Ash, "A Path Computation Element (PCE)-Based Architecture", RFC 4655, DOI 10.17487/RFC4655, August 2006. |
[RFC7420] | Koushik, A., Stephan, E., Zhao, Q., King, D. and J. Hardwick, "Path Computation Element Communication Protocol (PCEP) Management Information Base (MIB) Module", RFC 7420, DOI 10.17487/RFC7420, December 2014. |
[RFC8342] | Bjorklund, M., Schoenwaelder, J., Shafer, P., Watsen, K. and R. Wilton, "Network Management Datastore Architecture (NMDA)", RFC 8342, DOI 10.17487/RFC8342, March 2018. |