Distributed Mobility Managment Working Group | D. Liu |
Internet-Draft | H. Deng |
Updates: 5014 (if approved) | China Mobile |
Intended status: Standards Track | July 07, 2013 |
Expires: January 08, 2014 |
Mobility API Extension for Distributed Mobility Management
draft-liu-dmm-mobility-api-01
[RFC5014] specifies extension to socket API to allow application to specify the preference among multiple source addresses. [I-D.draft-korhonen-6man-prfix-properties] and [I-D.draft-bhandari-dhc-class-based-prefix-04] propose to extend router advertisment to carry the prefix property and class information. The mobile node can learn the prefix property and class information from the router advertisment message. This document proposes an extension to [RFC5014] to enable the application to select the distributed mobility management related prefixes.
The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT", "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described in RFC 2119 [RFC2119].
This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79.
Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF). Note that other groups may also distribute working documents as Internet-Drafts. The list of current Internet-Drafts is at http://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/.
Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."
This Internet-Draft will expire on January 08, 2014.
Copyright (c) 2013 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the document authors. All rights reserved.
This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal Provisions Relating to IETF Documents (http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of publication of this document. Please review these documents carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect to this document. Code Components extracted from this document must include Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as described in the Simplified BSD License.
[RFC5014]defines socket API extension used for IPv6 source address selection. Application can use this API to override the default source address selection mechanism for IPv6. Currently, [RFC5014] defines the following types of source address selection preference:
IPV6_PREFER_SRC_HOME /* Prefer Home address as source */
IPV6_PREFER_SRC_COA /* Prefer Care-of address as source */
IPV6_PREFER_SRC_TMP /* Prefer Temporary address as source */
IPV6_PREFER_SRC_PUBLIC /* Prefer Public address as source */
IPV6_PREFER_SRC_CGA /* Prefer CGA address as source */
IPV6_PREFER_SRC_NONCGA /* Prefer a non-CGA address as source */
This document proposes to extend the above definition to add two new flags:
IPV6_PREFER_SRC_LOCAL_HNP:
Prefer to use locally allocated home network prefix.
IPV6_PREFER_SRC_REMOTE_HNP:
Prefer to use the home network prefix that allocated by other access router instead of the one that the MN currently attach.
This section gives usage example for this API extension.
[I-D.draft-ietf-dmm-best-practices-gap-analysis-01] and [I-D.draft-seite-dmm-dma-06] discuss the distributed mobility management practice. It introduces dynamic anchoring concept: the mobile node can have multiple mobility anchor points and the mobile node select the locally allocated IP address for the newly started application for optimized routing. The mobile node can continue to use the IP address allocated by previous anchor point for the on going session. When the on going session terminate, the mobile node will release the previous anchor point allocated IP address.
In the dynamic anchoring scenario, for the newly started application, it should use the IP address allocated by the local mobility anchor. The application can use IPV6_PREFER_SRC_LOCAL_HNP flag to select the local allocated IP address. For the on going session, the application can use IPV6_PREFER_SRC_REMOTE_HNP flag to select the previous mobility anchor allocated home address to gurantee the session continuity.
This document makes no request of IANA.
Note to RFC Editor: this section may be removed on publication as an RFC.
TBD
TBD
[RFC2119] | Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, March 1997. |
[RFC5014] | Nordmark, E., Chakrabarti, S. and J. Laganier, "IPv6 Socket API for Source Address Selection", RFC 5014, September 2007. |
[I-D.draft-seite-dmm-dma-06] | Distributed Mobility Anchoring", Internet-Draft draft-seite-dmm-dma-06, January 2013. | , "
[I-D.draft-korhonen-6man-prfix-properties] | IPv6 Prefix Properties", Internet-Draft draft-korhonen-6man-prfix-properties, February 2013. | , "
[I-D.draft-bhandari-dhc-class-based-prefix-04] | DHCPv6 class based prefix ", Internet-Draft draft-bhandari-dhc-class-based-prefix-04, February 2013. | , "
[I-D.draft-ietf-dmm-best-practices-gap-analysis-01] | Distributed Mobility Management: Current practices and gap analysis ", Internet-Draft draft-ietf-dmm-best-practices-gap-analysis-01, June 2013. | , "