TOC |
|
This Internet-Draft is submitted to IETF in full conformance with the provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79.
Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF), its areas, and its working groups. Note that other groups may also distribute working documents as Internet-Drafts.
Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference material or to cite them other than as “work in progress.”
The list of current Internet-Drafts can be accessed at http://www.ietf.org/ietf/1id-abstracts.txt.
The list of Internet-Draft Shadow Directories can be accessed at http://www.ietf.org/shadow.html.
This Internet-Draft will expire on December 12, 2009.
Copyright (c) 2009 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the document authors. All rights reserved.
This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal Provisions Relating to IETF Documents in effect on the date of publication of this document (http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info). Please review these documents carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect to this document.
This specification defines mechanisms for in-lining representations of linked resources in Atom documents.
To provide feedback on this Internet-Draft, join the atom-syntax mailing list (http://www.imc.org/atom-syntax/).
1.
Introduction
1.1.
Namespace
1.2.
Notational Conventions
1.3.
Terminology
2.
In-line Representation of Resources
2.1.
The "ae:inline" Extension Element
2.1.1.
Empty "ae:inline" Element
2.1.2.
The "type" Attribute
2.1.3.
Processing Model
3.
Examples
3.1.
Feed with in-line replies link
3.2.
Entry with in-line up link
4.
Security Considerations
5.
References
5.1.
Normative References
5.2.
Informative References
Appendix A.
Acknowledgements
Appendix B.
Revision History
§
Author's Address
TOC |
This document defines an extension for in-line representations of linked resources within the Atom Syndication Format [RFC4287] (Nottingham, M., Ed. and R. Sayre, Ed., “The Atom Syndication Format,” December 2005.). Such in-line representations can be either text, binary, or well-formed XML.
TOC |
The XML Namespaces URI for the XML data format described in this specification is:
http://purl.org/atom/ext/
This specification uses the prefix "ae:" for the namespace name. The prefix "atom:" is used for "http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom", the namespace name of the Atom Syndication Format [RFC4287] (Nottingham, M., Ed. and R. Sayre, Ed., “The Atom Syndication Format,” December 2005.). These namespace prefixes are not semantically significant.
TOC |
Some sections of this specification are illustrated with fragments of a non-normative RELAX NG Compact schema [RELAXNG] (Clark, J., “RELAX NG Compact Syntax,” December 2001.). In those sections, this specification uses the xhtmlDiv, atomCommonAttributes, atomMediaType and anyElement, defined in [RFC4287] (Nottingham, M., Ed. and R. Sayre, Ed., “The Atom Syndication Format,” December 2005.).
However, the text of this specification provides the definition of conformance.
The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT", "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described in [RFC2119] (Bradner, S., “Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate Requirement Levels,” March 1997.).
TOC |
This specification uses Atom link relations to identify different types of links; see the Atom specification [RFC4287] (Nottingham, M., Ed. and R. Sayre, Ed., “The Atom Syndication Format,” December 2005.) for information about their syntax, and the IANA link relation registry for more information about specific values.
TOC |
Some applications require the ability to pre-fetch resources linked from an Atom document using the atom:link element [RFC4287] (Nottingham, M., Ed. and R. Sayre, Ed., “The Atom Syndication Format,” December 2005.). Such in-line representations are similar to the in-line content model of Atom.
An Atom document MAY include the in-line representation of a linked resource by using the ae:inline element inside the corresponding atom:link element. The in-lined representation is only a hint and MAY differ from the representation obtained from the URI referenced in the link. Atom Processors SHOULD use the link URI to obtain the complete representation of the linked resource.
TOC |
The "ae:inline" element contains an approximate representation of the linked resource.
extensionInlineTextRepresentation = element ae:inline { atomCommonAttributes, attribute type {"text" | "html"}?, (text)* } extensionInlineXHTMLRepresentation = element ae:inline { atomCommonAttributes, attribute type {"xhtml"}, xhtmlDiv } extensionInlineAtomRepresentation = element ae:inline { atomCommonAttributes, attribute type {"feed" | "entry"}, atomFeed | atomEntry } extensionInlineOtherRepresentation = element ae:inline { atomCommonAttributes, attribute type { atomMediaType }?, (text|anyElement)* } extensionInlineEmpty = element ae:inline { atomCommonAttributes, empty } extensionInline = extensionInlineTextRepresentation | extensionInlineXHTMLRepresentation | extensionInlineAtomRepresentation | extensionInlineOtherRepresentation | extensionInlineEmpty
TOC |
The ae:inline element may be empty if the producer of the Atom document a linked resource cannot be in-lined, e.g., due to inadequate authorization or if the resource does not yet exist.
TOC |
On the ae:inline element, the value of the "type" attribute MAY be one of "text", "html", "xhtml", "entry", or "feed". Failing that, it MUST conform to the syntax of a MIME media type, but MUST NOT be a composite type (see Section 4.2.6 of [RFC4288] (Freed, N. and J. Klensin, “Media Type Specifications and Registration Procedures,” December 2005.)). If the type attribute is not provided, Atom Processors MUST behave as though the type attribute were present with a value of "text".
The type attributes on an atom:link element and its nested ae:inline element may not match.
TOC |
Use of the in-line extensions MUST conform to the following rules. Conforming Atom Processors MUST interpret ae:inline according to the first applicable rule:
TOC |
TOC |
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0"> <id>http://www.example.org/entries</id> <title>My posts</title> <updated>2006-03-01T12:12:12Z</updated> <link rel="replies" thr:count="10" href="http://www.example.org/replies"> <ae:inline xmlns:ae="http://purl.org/atom/ext/" type="feed"> <feed> ... </feed> </ae:inline> </link> <link rel="self" href="http://www.example.org/entries" /> ... </feed>
TOC |
<entry xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"> <link rel="up" type="application/atom+xml" href="/finance/feeds/default/portfolios/1"> <ae:inline type="entry"> <atom:entry> ... </atom:entry> </ae:inline> </atom:link> <atom:link rel="edit" href="/finance/feeds/default/portfolios/1/positions/NASDAQ:ORCL"/> ... </atom:entry>
TOC |
In-line Extensions for Atom are subject to the security considerations found in Section 8 of [RFC4287] (Nottingham, M., Ed. and R. Sayre, Ed., “The Atom Syndication Format,” December 2005.).
In-line representations can overwhelm Atom processors. For this reason, consumers of Atom representations should take adequate precautions to limit resource consumption when processing ae:inline elements.
TOC |
TOC |
[HTML] | Raggett, D., Hors, A., and I. Jacobs, “HTML 4.01 Specification, W3C REC REC-html401-19991224,” December 1999. |
[RFC2119] | Bradner, S., “Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate Requirement Levels,” BCP 14, RFC 2119, March 1997 (TXT, HTML, XML). |
[RFC3023] | Murata, M., St. Laurent, S., and D. Kohn, “XML Media Types,” RFC 3023, January 2001 (TXT). |
[RFC3548] | Josefsson, S., “The Base16, Base32, and Base64 Data Encodings,” RFC 3548, July 2003 (TXT). |
[RFC3986] | Berners-Lee, T., Fielding, R., and L. Masinter, “Uniform Resource Identifier (URI): Generic Syntax,” STD 66, RFC 3986, January 2005 (TXT, HTML, XML). |
[RFC4287] | Nottingham, M., Ed. and R. Sayre, Ed., “The Atom Syndication Format,” RFC 4287, December 2005 (TXT, HTML, XML). |
[RFC4288] | Freed, N. and J. Klensin, “Media Type Specifications and Registration Procedures,” BCP 13, RFC 4288, December 2005 (TXT). |
[W3C.REC-XHTML] | Pemberton, S., “XHTML 1.0: The Extensible HyperText Markup Language,” W3C REC-XHTML, January 2000. |
TOC |
[RELAXNG] | Clark, J., “RELAX NG Compact Syntax,” December 2001. |
TOC |
On the atom-syntax mailing list, Hadrien Gardeur, Al Brown, Julian Reschke, Mark Nottingham, Pablo Castro, Kyle Marvin, and James Snell provided very valuable feedback to solidify this draft.
TOC |
00 - Initial Revision, split from draft-divilly-atom-hierarchy-01.
TOC |
Nikunj R. Mehta | |
Oracle Corp. | |
Email: | nikunj.mehta@oracle.com |
URI: | http://o-micron.blogspot.com/ |