XMPP M. Miller
Internet-Draft Cisco Systems, Inc.
Intended status: Standards Track February 25, 2013
Expires: August 29, 2013
End-to-End Object Encryption and Signatures for the Extensible Messaging
and Presence Protocol (XMPP)
draft-miller-xmpp-e2e-05
Abstract
This document defines a method of encrypting and signing objects
(often referred to as stanzas) for the Extensible Messaging and
Presence Protocol (XMPP).
Status of This Memo
This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the
provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79.
Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering
Task Force (IETF). Note that other groups may also distribute
working documents as Internet-Drafts. The list of current Internet-
Drafts is at http://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/.
Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months
and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any
time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference
material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."
This Internet-Draft will expire on August 29, 2013.
Copyright Notice
Copyright (c) 2013 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the
document authors. All rights reserved.
This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal
Provisions Relating to IETF Documents
(http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of
publication of this document. Please review these documents
carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect
to this document. Code Components extracted from this document must
include Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of
the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as
described in the Simplified BSD License.
Miller Expires August 29, 2013 [Page 1]
Internet-Draft XMPP E2E February 2013
Table of Contents
1. Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
2. Terminology . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
3. Encryption . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
3.1. Determining Support . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
3.2. Encrypting XMPP Stanzas . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
3.2.1. Prerequisites . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
3.2.2. Process . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
3.3. Decrypting XMPP Stanzas . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
3.3.1. Protocol Not Understood . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
3.3.2. Process . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
3.3.3. Insufficient Information . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
3.3.4. Failed Decryption . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
3.3.5. Timestamp Not Acceptable . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10
3.3.6. Successful Decryption . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10
3.4. Example - Securing a Message . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
4. Signatures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14
4.1. Determining Support . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14
4.2. Signing XMPP Stanzas . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14
4.2.1. Process . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14
4.3. Verifying Signed XMPP Stanzas . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16
4.3.1. Protocol Not Understood . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16
4.3.2. Process . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17
4.3.3. Insufficient Information . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17
4.3.4. Failed Verification . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18
4.3.5. Timestamp Not Acceptable . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19
4.3.6. Successful Verification . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19
4.4. Example - Signing a Message . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20
5. Requesting Session Keys . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22
5.1. Request Process . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22
5.2. Accept Process . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23
5.3. Error Conditions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25
5.4. Example of Successful Key Request . . . . . . . . . . . . 25
6. Mulitple Operations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 29
7. Inclusion and Checking of Timestamps . . . . . . . . . . . . 29
8. Interaction with Stanza Semantics . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30
9. Interaction with Offline Storage . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31
10. Mandatory-to-Implement Cryptographic Algorithms . . . . . . . 31
11. Security Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31
11.1. Storage of Encrypted Stanzas . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31
11.2. Re-use of Session Master Keys . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31
12. IANA Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 32
12.1. XML Namespaces Name for e2e Data in XMPP . . . . . . . . 32
13. References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 33
13.1. Normative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 33
13.2. Informative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 34
Appendix A. Schema for urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:xmpp-e2e:6 . . . . 34
Miller Expires August 29, 2013 [Page 2]
Internet-Draft XMPP E2E February 2013
Appendix B. Acknowledgements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 37
Author's Address . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 37
1. Introduction
End-to-end protection and authentication of traffic sent over the
Extensible Messaging and Presence Protocol [RFC6120] is a desirable
goal. Requirements and a threat analysis for XMPP encryption are
provided in [E2E-REQ]. Many possible approaches to meet those (or
similar) requirements have been proposed over the years, including
methods based on PGP, S/MIME, SIGMA, and TLS.
Most proposals have not been able to support multiple end-points for
a given recipient. As more devices support XMPP, it becomes more
desirable to allow an entity to communicate with another in a more
secure manner, regardless of the number of agents the entity is
employing. This document specifies an approach for encrypting and
signing communications between two entities which each might have
multiple end-points.
2. Terminology
This document inherits XMPP-related terminology from [RFC6120], JSON
Web Algorithms (JWA)-related terminology from [JOSE-JWA], JSON Web
Encryption (JWE)-related terminology from [JOSE-JWE], and JSON Web
Key (JWK)-related terminology from [JOSE-JWK]. Security-related
terms are to be understood in the sense defined in [RFC4949].
The capitalized key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL",
"SHALL NOT", "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and
"OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described in
[RFC2119].
3. Encryption
3.1. Determining Support
If an agent supports receiving end-to-end object encryption, it MUST
advertise that fact in its responses to [XEP-0030] information
("disco#info") requests by returning a feature of
"urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:xmpp-e2e:6:encryption".
...
Miller Expires August 29, 2013 [Page 3]
Internet-Draft XMPP E2E February 2013
...
To facilitate discovery, an agent SHOULD also include [XEP-0115]
information in any directed or broadcast presence updates.
3.2. Encrypting XMPP Stanzas
The process that a sending agent follows for securing stanzas is the
same regardless of the form of stanza (i.e., , , or
).
3.2.1. Prerequisites
First, the sending agent prepares and retains the following:
o The JID of the sender (i.e. its own JID). This SHOULD be the
bare JID (localpart@domainpart).
o The JID of the recipient. This SHOULD be the bare JID
(localpart@domainpart).
o A Session Master Key (SMK). The SMK MUST have a length at least
equal to that required by the key wrapping algorithm in use and
MUST be generated randomly. See [RFC4086] for considerations on
generating random values.
o A SMK identifier (SID). The SID MUST be unique for a given
(sender, recipient, SMK) tuple, and MUST NOT be derived from SMK
itself.
3.2.2. Process
For a given plaintext stanza (S), the sending agent performs the
following:
Miller Expires August 29, 2013 [Page 4]
Internet-Draft XMPP E2E February 2013
1. Ensures the plaintext stanza is fully qualified, including the
proper namespace declarations (e.g., contains the attribute
'xmlns' set to the value "jabber:client" for 'jabber:client'
stanzas defined in [RFC6120]).
2. Notes the current UTC date and time (N) when this stanza is
constructed, formatted as described under Section 7.
3. Constructs a forwarding envelope (M) using a element
qualified by the "urn:xmpp:forward:0" namespace (as defined in
[XEP-0297]) as follows:
* The child element qualified by the "urn:xmpp:delay"
namespace (as defined in [XEP-0203]) with the attribute
'stamp' set to the UTC date and time value N
* The plaintext stanza S
4. Converts the forwarding envelope (M) to a UTF-8 encoded string
(M'), optionallly removing line breaks and other insignificant
whitespace between elements and attributes, i.e. M' =
UTF8-encode(M). We call M' a "stanza-string" because for
purposes of encryption and decryption it is treated not as XML
but as an opaque string (this avoids the need for complex
canonicalization of the XML input).
5. Generates a Content Master Key (CMK). The CMK MUST have a length
at least equal to that required by the content encryption
algorithm in use and MUST be generated randomly. See [RFC4086]
for considerations on generating random values.
6. Generates any additional unprotected block cipher factors (IV);
e.g., initialization vector/nonce. A sending agent MUST ensure
that no two sets of factors are used with the same CMK, and
SHOULD NOT reuse such factors for other stanzas.
7. Performs the message encryption steps from [JOSE-JWE] to generate
the JWE Header (H), JWE Encrypted Key (E), JWE Ciphertext (C),
and JWE Integrity Value (I); using the following inputs:
Miller Expires August 29, 2013 [Page 5]
Internet-Draft XMPP E2E February 2013
* The 'alg' property is set to an appropriate key wrapping
algorithm (e.g., "A256KW" or "A128KW"); recipients use the key
request process in Section 5 to obtain the SMK.
* The 'enc' property is set to the intended content encryption
algorithm.
* SMK as the key for CMK Encryption.
* CMK as the JWE Content Master Key.
* IV as the JWE Initialization Vector.
* M' as the plaintext content to encrypt.
8. Constructs an element qualified by the
"urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:xmpp-e2e:6" namespace as follows:
* The attribute 'type' set to the value "enc".
* The attribute 'id' set to the identifier value SID.
* The child element qualified by the
"urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:xmpp-e2e:6" namespace and with XML
character data as H, encoded base64url as per [RFC4648].
* The child element qualified by the
"urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:xmpp-e2e:6" namespace and with XML
character as E, encoded base64url as per [RFC4648].
* The child element qualified by the
"urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:xmpp-e2e:6" namespace and with XML
character as IV, encoded base64url as per [RFC4648].
Miller Expires August 29, 2013 [Page 6]
Internet-Draft XMPP E2E February 2013
* The child element qualified by the
"urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:xmpp-e2e:6" namespace and with XML
character data as C, encoded base64url as per [RFC4648].
* The child element qualified by the
"urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:xmpp-e2e:6" namespace and with XML
character data as I, encoded base64url as per [RFC4648].
9. Sends the element as the payload of a stanza that SHOULD
match the stanza from step 1 in kind (e.g., ), type
(e.g., "chat"), and addressing (e.g., to="romeo@montague.net"
from="juliet@capulet.net/balcony"). If the original stanza (S)
has a value for the 'id' attribute, this stanza MUST NOT use the
same value for its 'id' attribute.
3.3. Decrypting XMPP Stanzas
3.3.1. Protocol Not Understood
If the receiving agent does not understand the protocol, it MUST do
one and only one of the following: (1) ignore the extension,
(2) ignore the entire stanza, or (3) return a
error to the sender, as described in [RFC6120].
NOTE: If the inbound stanza is an , the receiving agent MUST
return an error to the sending agent, to comply with the exchanging
of IQ stanzas in [RFC6121].
3.3.2. Process
Upon receipt of an encrypted stanza, the receiving agent performs the
following:
1. Determines if a valid SMK is available, associated with the SID
specified by the 'id' attribute value of the element and
the sending agent JID specified by the 'from' attribute of the
wrapping stanza. If the receiving agent does not already have
the SMK, it requests it according to Section 5.
2. Performs the message decryption steps from [JOSE-JWE] to generate
the plaintext forwarding envelope string M', using the following
inputs:
Miller Expires August 29, 2013 [Page 7]
Internet-Draft XMPP E2E February 2013
* The JWE Header (H) from the element's character
data content.
* The JWE Encrypted Key (E) from the element's character
data content.
* The JWE Initialization Vector/Nonce (I) from the
element's character data content.
* The JWE Ciphertext (C) from the element's character
data content.
* The JWE Integrity Value (I) from the element's
character data content.
3. Converts the forwarding envelope UTF-8 encoded string M' into XML
element (M).
4. Obtains the UTC date and time (N) from the child
element, and verifies it is within the accepted range, as
specified in Section 7.
5. Obtains the plaintext stanza (S), which is a child element node
of M; the stanza MUST be fully qualified with proper namespace
declarations for XMPP stanzas, to help distinguish it from other
content within M.
.
3.3.3. Insufficient Information
At step 1, if the receiving agent is unable to obtain the CMK, or the
receiving agent could not otherwise determine the additional
information, it MAY return a error to the sending
agent (as described in [RFC6120]), optionally supplemented by an
application-specific error condition element of :
[XML character data]
[XML character data]
[XML character data]
[XML character data]
[XML character data]
In addition to returning an error, the receiving agent SHOULD NOT
present the stanza to the intended recipient (human or application)
and SHOULD provide some explicit alternate processing of the stanza
(which MAY be to display a message informing the recipient that it
has received a stanza that cannot be decrypted).
3.3.4. Failed Decryption
At step 2, if the receiving agent is unable to successfully decrypt
the stanza, the receiving agent SHOULD return a error
to the sending agent (as described in [RFC6120]), optionally
supplemented by an application-specific error condition element of
(previously defined in [RFC3923]):
[XML character data]
[XML character data]
[XML character data]
[XML character data]
[XML character data]
Miller Expires August 29, 2013 [Page 9]
Internet-Draft XMPP E2E February 2013
In addition to returning an error, the receiving agent SHOULD NOT
present the stanza to the intended recipient (human or application)
and SHOULD provide some explicit alternate processing of the stanza
(which MAY be to display a message informing the recipient that it
has received a stanza that cannot be decrypted).
3.3.5. Timestamp Not Acceptable
At step 4, if the stanza is successfully decrypted but the timestamp
fails the checks outlined in Section 7, the receiving agent MAY
return a error to the sender (as described in
[RFC6120]), optionally supplemented by an application-specific error
condition element of (previously defined in
[RFC3923]):
[XML character data]
[XML character data]
[XML character data]
[XML character data]
[XML character data]
3.3.6. Successful Decryption
If the receiving agent successfully decrypted the payload, it MUST
NOT return a stanza error.
Miller Expires August 29, 2013 [Page 10]
Internet-Draft XMPP E2E February 2013
If the payload is an of type "get" or "set", and the response
to this is of type "error", the receiving agent MUST send the
encrypted response wrapped in an of type "result", to prevent
exposing information about the payload.
3.4. Example - Securing a Message
NOTE: unless otherwise indicated, all line breaks are included for
readability.
The sending agent begins with the plaintext version of the
stanza 'S':
35740be5-b5a4-4c4e-962a-a03b14ed92f4
But to be frank, and give it thee again.
And yet I wish but for the thing I have.
My bounty is as boundless as the sea,
My love as deep; the more I give to thee,
The more I have, for both are infinite.
and the following prerequisites:
o Sender JID as "juliet@capulet.lit/balcony"
o Recipient JID as "romeo@montegue.lit"
o Session Master Key (SMK) as (base64 encoded)
"xWtdjhYsH4Va_9SfYSefsJfZu03m5RrbXo_UavxxeU8"
o SMK identifier (SID) as "835c92a8-94cd-4e96-b3f3-b2e75a438f92"
The sending agent performs steps 1, 2, and 3 from Section 3.2.2 to
generate the envelope:
35740be5-b5a4-4c4e-962a-a03b14ed92f4
But to be frank, and give it thee again.
And yet I wish but for the thing I have.
My bounty is as boundless as the sea,
My love as deep; the more I give to thee,
The more I have, for both are infinite.
Then the sending agent performs steps 4 through 7 (with Content
Master Key as "upIjc_ePSomSETgi0DEnXsoT8ZEGf0QxsSHr_eDZRnlkJAJBFyenb6
tm1WDAoqFD7-BHBtWqO5hOJlj2oxlDwQ", base64url encoded) to generate the
[JOSE-JWE] outputs:
JWE Header
{
"alg":"A256KW",
"enc":"A256CBC+HS512",
"kid":"835c92a8-94cd-4e96-b3f3-b2e75a438f92"
}
JWE Encrypted Key
4ui5xwE1gEYjuptNgSIaMFlwWrAOxMqBkaplTxeJ6b2iT8kQP2HHy5PYpqqmDxl
QgT5I5rO9mgAD7AUJ9Lx35fGdi5CMiRww
JWE Initialization Vector
B7waCj2vF_sLaJfe-1GHrA
JWE Ciphertext
Miller Expires August 29, 2013 [Page 12]
Internet-Draft XMPP E2E February 2013
UYbe-ziNGBL74581rynr9MWu0Ble_6M5LFCH9xOYXgALtlDih28Ilmf-Rs68uaZ
sOND-7Ii9zK4H4XBwJjxaUlDGChZPWdwotRZdQKt9ZLpiQmjkzrQgKVQqyexP6m
qhfWRHutEKgs6vR32O2P98J-4LAWoUza5qYCZHP5NCogLUBVKi-v-vGpHDKBG_S
w3ejHSXuZOEZtyXShL2d6EXOhEzft8ViaTUKhiBCLz1q39hI5TsPdS7NPHGQDUX
Db_gSw8yVCiJgxcSbfWJKj9v_zIZgxawZby6-qif7vTIizluirnSTRO-5-2xM_n
sJEpG7ZOqofzp_WKLPkOQfa8roYGp61R5BK2M3q9LKM6y1XlMrtYFyPWH70bVPC
S_kOMrrn_48G7zmPEl-2SZWrBj4llu0oPzO2EU4uh3ipb_xUwkPPQfTkwxEdcdl
Cbi4FFIQtw81_7bPwZ3m799O_-aPspkk4uFn_cKayeN3XKf8T-i9pYPWYEOugGq
GU3H0I-jfwvqt2K6GGctoXWD6-d56WFlLhv4v6qGPT5C30vO-xM22BU9nwc-rff
4Q7cFBBM_7ciZrrTQf_PBjBhWS_pTYsmIUL-h7dwhcgQ1LEdgpqAWbZ23aMDWx-
RSQSkRY6OlPYKkbrXUbXHWxlgb5B76eA
JWE Integrity Value
G5csTEYKIXipYM1Ey4_4JSUeHpgpd8lMvYxTHwPvSd7w916w0Q8VQekY1tz8VnA
DJ751V6YiJ295_3jQUphxmQ
Then the sending agent performs steps 8 and 9, and sends the
following:
eyJhbGciOiJBMjU2S1ciLCJlbmMiOiJBMjU2Q0JDK0hTNTEyIiwia2lkI
joiODM1YzkyYTgtOTRjZC00ZTk2LWIzZjMtYjJlNzVhNDM4ZjkyIn0
4ui5xwE1gEYjuptNgSIaMFlwWrAOxMqBkaplTxeJ6b2iT8kQP2HHy5PYp
qqmDxlQgT5I5rO9mgAD7AUJ9Lx35fGdi5CMiRww
B7waCj2vF_sLaJfe-1GHrA
UYbe-ziNGBL74581rynr9MWu0Ble_6M5LFCH9xOYXgALtlDih28Ilmf-R
s68uaZsOND-7Ii9zK4H4XBwJjxaUlDGChZPWdwotRZdQKt9ZLpiQmjkzr
QgKVQqyexP6mqhfWRHutEKgs6vR32O2P98J-4LAWoUza5qYCZHP5NCogL
UBVKi-v-vGpHDKBG_Sw3ejHSXuZOEZtyXShL2d6EXOhEzft8ViaTUKhiB
CLz1q39hI5TsPdS7NPHGQDUXDb_gSw8yVCiJgxcSbfWJKj9v_zIZgxawZ
by6-qif7vTIizluirnSTRO-5-2xM_nsJEpG7ZOqofzp_WKLPkOQfa8roY
Miller Expires August 29, 2013 [Page 13]
Internet-Draft XMPP E2E February 2013
Gp61R5BK2M3q9LKM6y1XlMrtYFyPWH70bVPCS_kOMrrn_48G7zmPEl-2S
ZWrBj4llu0oPzO2EU4uh3ipb_xUwkPPQfTkwxEdcdlCbi4FFIQtw81_7b
PwZ3m799O_-aPspkk4uFn_cKayeN3XKf8T-i9pYPWYEOugGqGU3H0I-jf
wvqt2K6GGctoXWD6-d56WFlLhv4v6qGPT5C30vO-xM22BU9nwc-rff4Q7
cFBBM_7ciZrrTQf_PBjBhWS_pTYsmIUL-h7dwhcgQ1LEdgpqAWbZ23aMD
Wx-RSQSkRY6OlPYKkbrXUbXHWxlgb5B76eA
G5csTEYKIXipYM1Ey4_4JSUeHpgpd8lMvYxTHwPvSd7w916w0Q8VQekY1
tz8VnADJ751V6YiJ295_3jQUphxmQ
4. Signatures
4.1. Determining Support
If an agent supports receiving end-to-end object signatures, it MUST
advertise that fact in its responses to [XEP-0030] information
("disco#info") requests by returning a feature of
"urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:xmpp-e2e:6:signatures".
...
...
To facilitate discovery, an agent SHOULD also include [XEP-0115]
information in any directed or broadcast presence updates.
4.2. Signing XMPP Stanzas
The basic process that a sending agent follows for authenticating
stanzas is the same regardless of the kind of stanza (i.e., ,
, or ).
4.2.1. Process
Miller Expires August 29, 2013 [Page 14]
Internet-Draft XMPP E2E February 2013
For a given plaintext stanza (S), the sending agent performs the
following:
1. Ensures the plaintext stanza is fully qualified, including the
proper namespace declarations (e.g., contains the attribute
'xmlns' set to the value "jabber:client" for 'jabber:client'
stanzas defined in [RFC6120]).
2. Notes the current UTC date and time (N) when this stanza is
constructed, formatted as described under Section 7.
3. Constructs a forwarding envelope (M) using a element
qualified by the "urn:xmpp:forward:0" namespace (as defined in
[XEP-0297]) as follows:
* The child element qualified by the "urn:xmpp:delay"
namespace (as defined in [XEP-0203]) with the attribute
'stamp' set to the UTC date and time value N
* The plaintext stanza S
4. Converts the forwarding envelope (M) to a UTF-8 encoded string
(M'), optionallly removing line breaks and other insignificant
whitespace between elements and attributes, i.e. M' =
UTF8-encode(M). We call M' a "stanza-string" because for
purposes of encryption and decryption it is treated not as XML
but as an opaque string (this avoids the need for complex
canonicalization of the XML input).
5. Chooses a private asymmetric key (PK) for which the sending agent
has published the corresponding public key to the intended
recipients.
6. Performs the message signatures steps from [JOSE-JWS] to generate
the JWS Header (H) and JWS Signature (I); using the following
inputs:
* The 'alg' property is set to an appropriate signature
algorithm for PK (e.g., "R256").
Miller Expires August 29, 2013 [Page 15]
Internet-Draft XMPP E2E February 2013
* M' as the JWS Payload.
7. Constructs an element qualified by the
"urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:xmpp-e2e:6" namespace as follows:
* The attribute 'type' set to the value "sig"
* The child element qualified by the
"urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:xmpp-e2e:6" namespace and with XML
character data as H, encoded base64url as per [RFC4648].
* The child element qualified by the
"urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:xmpp-e2e:6" namespace and with XML
character data as M', encoded base64url as per [RFC4648].
* The child element qualified by the
"urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:xmpp-e2e:6" namespace and with XML
character data as I, encoded base64url as per [RFC4648].
8. Sends the element as the payload of a stanza that SHOULD
match the stanza from step 1 in kind (e.g., ), type
(e.g., "chat"), and addressing (e.g., to="romeo@montegue.lit"
from="juliet@capulet.lit/balcony"). If the original stanza (S)
has a value for the 'id' attribute, this stanza SHOULD NOT use
the same value for its "id" attribute.
4.3. Verifying Signed XMPP Stanzas
4.3.1. Protocol Not Understood
If the receiving agent does not understand the protocol, it MUST do
one and only one of the following: (1) ignore the extension,
(2) ignore the entire stanza, or (3) return a
error to the sender, as described in [RFC6120].
NOTE: If the inbound stanza is an , the receiving agent MUST
return an error to the sending agent, to comply with the exchanging
of IQ stanzas in [RFC6121].
Miller Expires August 29, 2013 [Page 16]
Internet-Draft XMPP E2E February 2013
4.3.2. Process
Upon receipt of a signed stanza, the receiving agent performs the
following:
1. Ensures it has appropriate materials to verify the signature,
which generally means ensuring that it possesses one or more
public keys for the sending agent (if one is not provided as part
of the JWS Header).
2. Performs the message validation steps from [JOSE-JWS], with the
following inputs:
* The JWS Header H from the element's character
data content.
* The JWS Playload M' from the element's character data
content.
* The JWS Signature from the element's character data
content.
3. Converts the forwarding envelope UTF-encoded string M' into XML
element M.
4. Obtains the UTC date and time N from the child element,
and verifies it is within the accepted range, as specified in
Section 7.
5. Obtains the plaintext stanza S, which is a child element node of
M; the stanza MUST be fully qualified with the proper namespace
declrations from XMPP stanzas, to help distinguish it from other
content within M.
4.3.3. Insufficient Information
At step 1, if the receiving agent does not have the key used to sign
the stanza, or the receiving agent could not otherwise determine it,
it MAY return a error to the sending agent (as
described in [RFC6120]), optionally supplemented by an application-
specific error condition element of :
Miller Expires August 29, 2013 [Page 17]
Internet-Draft XMPP E2E February 2013
[XML character data]
[XML character data]
[XML character data]
In addition to returning an error, the receiving agent SHOULD NOT
present the stanza to the intended recipient (human or application)
and SHOULD provide some explicit alternate processing of the stanza
(which MAY be to display a message informing the recipient that it
has received a stanza that cannot be verified).
4.3.4. Failed Verification
At step 2, if the receiving agent is unable to successfully verify
the stanza, the receiving agent SHOULD return a error
to the sending agent (as described in [RFC6120]), optionally
supplemented by an application-specific error condition element of
:
[XML character data]
[XML character data]
[XML character data]
Miller Expires August 29, 2013 [Page 18]
Internet-Draft XMPP E2E February 2013
In addition to returning an error, the receiving agent SHOULD NOT
present the stanza to the intended recipient (human or application)
and SHOULD provide some explicit alternate processing of the stanza
(which MAY be to display a message informing the recipient that it
has received a stanza that cannot be verified).
4.3.5. Timestamp Not Acceptable
At step 4, if the stanza is successfully verified but the timestamp
fails the checks outlined in Section 7, the receiving agent MAY
return a error to the sender (as described in
[RFC6120]), optionally supplemented by an application-specific error
condition element of (previously defined in
[RFC3923]):
[XML character data]
[XML character data]
[XML character data]
4.3.6. Successful Verification
If the receiving agent successfully verified the payload, it SHOULD
NOT return a stanza error. However, if the signed stanza is an
of type "get" or "set", the response MAY be sent unsigned if the
receiving agent does not have an appropriate public-private key-pair.
Miller Expires August 29, 2013 [Page 19]
Internet-Draft XMPP E2E February 2013
Otherwise, the receiving agent SHOULD send the response signed
as per Section 4.2.1, with the 'type' attribute set to the value
"result", even if the response to the signed stanza is of type
"error". The error applies to the signed stanza, not the wrapping
stanza.
4.4. Example - Signing a Message
NOTE: unless otherwise indicated, all line breaks are included for
readability.
The sending agent beings with the plaintext version of
stanza 'S':
35740be5-b5a4-4c4e-962a-a03b14ed92f4
But to be frank, and give it thee again.
And yet I wish but for the thing I have.
My bounty is as boundless as the sea,
My love as deep; the more I give to thee,
The more I have, for both are infinite.
Then the sending agent performs steps 1, 2, and 3 from Section 4.2.1
generate the envelope M:
35740be5-b5a4-4c4e-962a-a03b14ed92f4
But to be frank, and give it thee again.
And yet I wish but for the thing I have.
My bounty is as boundless as the sea,
My love as deep; the more I give to thee,
The more I have, for both are infinite.
Miller Expires August 29, 2013 [Page 20]
Internet-Draft XMPP E2E February 2013
Then the sending agent performs steps 4, 5, and 6 to generate the
[JOSE-JWS] outputs:
JWS Header (before base64url encoding)
{
"alg":"RS512",
"kid":"juliet@capulet.lit"
}
JWS Payload
PGZvcndhcmRlZCB4bWxucz0idXJuOnhtcHA6Zm9yd2FyZDowIj48ZGVsYXkgeG1
sbnM9InVybjp4bXBwOmRlbGF5IiBzdGFtcD0iMTQ5Mi0wNTEyVDIwOjA3OjM3Lj
AxMloiLz48bWVzc2FnZSB4bWxucz0iamFiYmVyOmNsaWVudCIgZnJvbT0ianVsa
WV0QGNhcHVsZXQubGl0L2JhbGNvbnkiIHRvPSJyb21lb0Btb250ZWd1ZS5saXQi
IHR5cGU9ImNoYXQiPjx0aHJlYWQ-MzU3NDBiZTUtYjVhNC00YzRlLTk2MmEtYTA
zYjE0ZWQ5MmY0PC90aHJlYWQ-PGJvZHk-QnV0IHRvIGJlIGZyYW5rLCBhbmQgZ2
l2ZSBpdCB0aGVlIGFnYWluLiBBbmQgeWV0IEkgd2lzaCBidXQgZm9yIHRoZSB0a
GluZyBJIGhhdmUuIE15IGJvdW50eSBpcyBhcyBib3VuZGxlc3MgYXMgdGhlIHNl
YSwgTXkgbG92ZSBhcyBkZWVwOyB0aGUgbW9yZSBJIGdpdmUgdG8gdGhlZSwgVGh
lIG1vcmUgSSBoYXZlLCBmb3IgYm90aCBhcmUgaW5maW5pdGUuPC9ib2R5PjwvbW
Vzc2FnZT48L2ZvcndhcmRlZD4
JWS Signature
Mq4m-7qP05rxyvHinQ4GGvApKKmjGJaCbQHO1I_5P4gmIcn1gAan_4l2nIHXHyU
FPpT3OLpLwEaaAbuo6jPRYdC3J4VjpOWoBy1usAtjHgzgZvs4QLzynCkZ_NQoqE
OwXWe-Wl8KF11w0J2DePcORcELl5L4E6cdBVHxwJ36lmsPWSNiBcT9n2F41kZR0
-xs0SniHT8LBu9zE0zuerVvlI-FqE1yTAC49v-f3vahrcyaJHVvb-I4SAMm76Sz
dcCPCGEU8mKD1USDtuuWM84GwYLxYuhHOvZVtf_qMHY6ajfr9Fz3Hvc1r7WQLV8
wi79H3eDoOEqXf_epTeCldOfIrA
Then the sending agent performs steps 7 and 8 and sends the
following:
eyJhbGciOiJSUzUxMiIsImtpZCI6Imp1bGlldEBjYXB1bGV0LmxpdCJ9
PGZvcndhcmRlZCB4bWxucz0idXJuOnhtcHA6Zm9yd2FyZDowIj48ZGVsY
XkgeG1sbnM9InVybjp4bXBwOmRlbGF5IiBzdGFtcD0iMTQ5Mi0wNTEyVD
IwOjA3OjM3LjAxMloiLz48bWVzc2FnZSB4bWxucz0iamFiYmVyOmNsaWV
udCIgZnJvbT0ianVsaWV0QGNhcHVsZXQubGl0L2JhbGNvbnkiIHRvPSJy
b21lb0Btb250ZWd1ZS5saXQiIHR5cGU9ImNoYXQiPjx0aHJlYWQ-MzU3N
DBiZTUtYjVhNC00YzRlLTk2MmEtYTAzYjE0ZWQ5MmY0PC90aHJlYWQ-PG
JvZHk-QnV0IHRvIGJlIGZyYW5rLCBhbmQgZ2l2ZSBpdCB0aGVlIGFnYWl
uLiBBbmQgeWV0IEkgd2lzaCBidXQgZm9yIHRoZSB0aGluZyBJIGhhdmUu
IE15IGJvdW50eSBpcyBhcyBib3VuZGxlc3MgYXMgdGhlIHNlYSwgTXkgb
G92ZSBhcyBkZWVwOyB0aGUgbW9yZSBJIGdpdmUgdG8gdGhlZSwgVGhlIG
1vcmUgSSBoYXZlLCBmb3IgYm90aCBhcmUgaW5maW5pdGUuPC9ib2R5Pjw
vbWVzc2FnZT48L2ZvcndhcmRlZD4
Mq4m-7qP05rxyvHinQ4GGvApKKmjGJaCbQHO1I_5P4gmIcn1gAan_4l2n
IHXHyUFPpT3OLpLwEaaAbuo6jPRYdC3J4VjpOWoBy1usAtjHgzgZvs4QL
zynCkZ_NQoqEOwXWe-Wl8KF11w0J2DePcORcELl5L4E6cdBVHxwJ36lms
PWSNiBcT9n2F41kZR0-xs0SniHT8LBu9zE0zuerVvlI-FqE1yTAC49v-f
3vahrcyaJHVvb-I4SAMm76SzdcCPCGEU8mKD1USDtuuWM84GwYLxYuhHO
vZVtf_qMHY6ajfr9Fz3Hvc1r7WQLV8wi79H3eDoOEqXf_epTeCldOfIrA
5. Requesting Session Keys
Because of the dynamic nature of XMPP stanza routing, the protocol
does not exchange session keys as part of the encrypted stanza.
Instead, a separate protocol is used by receiving agents to request a
particular session key from the sending agent.
5.1. Request Process
Before a SMK can be requested, the receiving agent MUST have at least
one public key for which it also has the private key. The public
key(s) are provided to the sending agent as part of this process.
To request a SMK, the receiving agent performs the following:
1. Constructs a [JOSE-JWK] JWK Set (KS), containing information
about each public key the requesting agent wishes to use. Each
Miller Expires August 29, 2013 [Page 22]
Internet-Draft XMPP E2E February 2013
key SHOULD include a value for the property 'kid' which uniquely
identifies it within the context of all provided keys. Each key
MUST include a value for the property 'kid' if any two keys use
the same algorithm.
2. Constructs a element qualified by the
"urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:xmpp-e2e:6" namespace as follows:
* The attribute 'id' set to the SMK identifier value SID.
* The child element qualified by the
"urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:xmpp-e2e:6" namespace and with XML
character data as KS, encoded base64url as per [RFC4648].
3. Sends the element as the payload of an stanza
with the attribute 'type' set to "get", the attribute 'to' set to
the full JID of the original encrypted stanza's sender, and the
attribute 'id' set to an opaque string value the receiving agent
uses to track the response.
5.2. Accept Process
If the sending agent approves the request, it performs the following
steps:
1. Generate a JSON Web Key (JWK) representing the SMK (according to
[JOSE-JPSK]):
* The "kty" parameter MUST be "oct".
* The "kid" parameter MUST be the SID.
* The "k" parameter MUST be the SMK, encoded as base64url.
* The "use" parameter, if present, MUST be set to the algorithm
in use for encrypting messages from Section 3.2.
Miller Expires August 29, 2013 [Page 23]
Internet-Draft XMPP E2E February 2013
* The "use" parameter, if present, MUST be set to "enc".
2. Chooses a key (PK) from the keys provided via KS, and notes its
identifier value 'kid'.
3. Protects the SMK using the process outlined in [JOSE-KEYPROTECT]
to generate the JWE Header (H), JWE Encrypted Key (E), JWE
Initialization Vector (IV), JWE Ciphertext (C), and JWE Integrity
Value (I); using the following inputs:
* The 'alg' property is set to an algorithm appropriate for the
chosen PK (e.g., "RSA-OAEP" for a "RSA" key).
* The 'enc' property is set to the intended content encryption
algorithm.
* A randomly generated CMK. See [RFC4086] for considerations on
generating random values.
* A randomly generated initialization vector. See [RFC4086] for
considerations on generating random values.
* SMK, formatted as a JWK as above.
4. Constructs a element qualified by the
"urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:xmpp-e2e:6" namespace as follows:
* The attribute 'id' set to the SMK Identifier (SID).
* The child element qualified by the
"urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:xmpp-e2e:6" namespace and with XML
character data as H, encoded base64url as per [RFC4648].
* The child element qualified by the
"urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:xmpp-e2e:6" namespace and with XML
character data as E, encoded base64url as per [RFC4648].
Miller Expires August 29, 2013 [Page 24]
Internet-Draft XMPP E2E February 2013
* The child element qualified by the
"urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:xmpp-e2e:6" namespace and with XML
character data as IV, encoded base64url as per [RFC4648].
* The child element qualified by the
"urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:xmpp-e2e:6" namespace and with XML
character data as C, encoded base64url as per [RFC4648].
* The child element qualified by the
"urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:xmpp-e2e:6" namespace and with XML
character data as I, encoded base64url as per [RFC4648].
5. Sends the element as the payload of an stanza
with the attribute 'type' set to "result", the attribute 'to' set
to the full JID from the request 's 'from' attribute, and
the attribute 'id' set to the value of the request 's 'id'
attribute.
5.3. Error Conditions
If the sending agent does not approve the request, it sends an
stanza of type "error" and containing the reason for denying the
request:
o : the key request is made by an entity that is not
authorized to decrypt stanzas from the sending agent and/or for
the indicated SID.
o : the requested SID is no longer valid.
o : the key request did not contain any keys the
sending agent understands.
5.4. Example of Successful Key Request
NOTE: unless otherwise indicated, all line breaks are included for
readability.
To begin a key request, the receiving agent performs step 1 from
Section 5.1 to generate the [JOSE-JWK]:
Miller Expires August 29, 2013 [Page 25]
Internet-Draft XMPP E2E February 2013
{
"keys": [{
"kty":"RSA",
"kid":"romeo@montegue.lit/garden",
"n":"vtqejkMF01h8oKEaHfHEYO0C2jM7eISbbSvNs0SNItYWO6GbjpJf
N4ldXw2vpVRdysnwU3zk6o2_SD0YCH1WgeuI0QK1knMTDdNSXx52e1c4BTw
hlA8iHuutTWmpBqesn1GNZmqB3jYsJOkVBYwCJtkB9APaBvk0itlRtizjCf
1HHnau7nGStyshgu8-srxi_d8rC5TTLSB_zT1i6fP8fwDloemXOtC0U65by
5P-1ZHxaf_bD8fpjps6gwSgdkZKMJAI0bOWZWuMpp2ntqa0wLB7Ndxb2Ijr
eog_s5ssAoSiXDVdoswSbp36ZP-1lnCk2j-vZ4qbhaFg5bZtgt-gwQ",
"e":"AQAB"
}]
}
Then the receiving agent performs step 2 to generate the :
eyJrZXlzIjpbeyJrdHkiOiJSU0EiLCJraWQiOiJyb21lb0Btb250ZWd1ZS5
saXQvZ2FyZGVuIiwibiI6InZ0cWVqa01GMDFoOG9LRWFIZkhFWU8wQzJqTT
dlSVNiYlN2TnMwU05JdFlXTzZHYmpwSmZONGxkWHcydnBWUmR5c253VTN6a
zZvMl9TRDBZQ0gxV2dldUkwUUsxa25NVERkTlNYeDUyZTFjNEJUd2hsQThp
SHV1dFRXbXBCcWVzbjFHTlptcUIzallzSk9rVkJZd0NKdGtCOUFQYUJ2azB
pdGxSdGl6akNmMUhIbmF1N25HU3R5c2hndTgtc3J4aV9kOHJDNVRUTFNCX3
pUMWk2ZlA4ZndEbG9lbVhPdEMwVTY1Ynk1UC0xWkh4YWZfYkQ4ZnBqcHM2Z
3dTZ2RrWktNSkFJMGJPV1pXdU1wcDJudHFhMHdMQjdOZHhiMklqcmVvZ19z
NXNzQW9TaVhEVmRvc3dTYnAzNlpQLTFsbkNrMmotdlo0cWJoYUZnNWJadGd
0LWd3USIsImUiOiJBUUFCIn1dfQ
Then the receiving agent performs step 3 and sends the following:
eyJrZXlzIjpbeyJrdHkiOiJSU0EiLCJraWQiOiJyb21lb0Btb250ZWd1Z
S5saXQvZ2FyZGVuIiwibiI6InZ0cWVqa01GMDFoOG9LRWFIZkhFWU8wQz
JqTTdlSVNiYlN2TnMwU05JdFlXTzZHYmpwSmZONGxkWHcydnBWUmR5c25
3VTN6azZvMl9TRDBZQ0gxV2dldUkwUUsxa25NVERkTlNYeDUyZTFjNEJU
Miller Expires August 29, 2013 [Page 26]
Internet-Draft XMPP E2E February 2013
d2hsQThpSHV1dFRXbXBCcWVzbjFHTlptcUIzallzSk9rVkJZd0NKdGtCO
UFQYUJ2azBpdGxSdGl6akNmMUhIbmF1N25HU3R5c2hndTgtc3J4aV9kOH
JDNVRUTFNCX3pUMWk2ZlA4ZndEbG9lbVhPdEMwVTY1Ynk1UC0xWkh4YWZ
fYkQ4ZnBqcHM2Z3dTZ2RrWktNSkFJMGJPV1pXdU1wcDJudHFhMHdMQjdO
ZHhiMklqcmVvZ19zNXNzQW9TaVhEVmRvc3dTYnAzNlpQLTFsbkNrMmotd
lo0cWJoYUZnNWJadGd0LWd3USIsImUiOiJBUUFCIn1dfQ
If the sending agent accepts this key request, it performs step 1
from Section 5.2 to generate JWK representation of the SMK:
{
"kty":"oct",
"kid":"835c92a8-94cd-4e96-b3f3-b2e75a438f92",
"oct":"xWtdjhYsH4Va_9SfYSefsJfZu03m5RrbXo_UavxxeU8"
}
Then the sending agent performs steps 2 and 3 to generate the
protected SMK:
JWE Header (before base64url encoding)
{
"alg":"RSA-OAEP",
"enc":"A256CBC+HS512",
"kid":"romeo@montegue.lit/garden"
}
JWE Encrypted Key
UeoVeGcZP-VsLu1PVj3NNWkmmEF7H2Nl_mHWscOuT_vYn-4ub2NEnRy4dzyycgx
ny6jmRPpNiGJB6AfI4TYZvrjig5dubv4uG7phCvKYVI3uaUU58Fc9H_o-BTmNv2
rUT-RGt6YYLW97ZJp5ZcA2l-KxykcxaRYC4Sv_UOS3Kqo0sVx5u7tolE6SbMnUH
etg91Gc9pVVa1XX-wz4ZrcA6V8zf8pCtmc4WyDMFx8RYYXR_5Qvax-TzOJUL2eA
r3OQsf3KNh58WvvzcwAKTmR214QmZCxI_A5mIqoog0H0uV987P9yw1wFfsmg7z-
Y2Ed7Blp-zLOvXEQKU9FM-vjBnA
JWE Initialization Vector
eiXTO21DNqFnCTQkLAoAtA
Miller Expires August 29, 2013 [Page 27]
Internet-Draft XMPP E2E February 2013
JWE Ciphertext
e8sZiRvKLPOUjmFwOYhvrZMQYzW1yglg6mTnazJU_rF7mXTBIieNZCd7hDrlrdG
SxqqUgh6N1O2QBLygf2PtWDmHHjn1aLncx6qlGf0UOxCCXUBfBIhZgFH5YX1i3_
VSsNUDEoIKTGA21EnamOqa1A
JWE Integrity Value
WQzHj3j30Qo7VakMM42t-X1omQVGyebd3No9ZFGPQNUwEWONjIcZ89_wFBhZFdd
kc8i_qtXi-9XPmSVei3A_Jw
Then the sending agent performs step 4 to generate the
response:
eyJhbGciOiJSU0EtT0FFUCIsImVuYyI6IkEyNTZDQkMrSFM1MTIiLCJraWQ
iOiJyb21lb0Btb250ZWd1ZS5saXQvZ2FyZGVuIn0
UeoVeGcZP-VsLu1PVj3NNWkmmEF7H2Nl_mHWscOuT_vYn-4ub2NEnRy4dzy
ycgxny6jmRPpNiGJB6AfI4TYZvrjig5dubv4uG7phCvKYVI3uaUU58Fc9H_
o-BTmNv2rUT-RGt6YYLW97ZJp5ZcA2l-KxykcxaRYC4Sv_UOS3Kqo0sVx5u
7tolE6SbMnUHetg91Gc9pVVa1XX-wz4ZrcA6V8zf8pCtmc4WyDMFx8RYYXR
_5Qvax-TzOJUL2eAr3OQsf3KNh58WvvzcwAKTmR214QmZCxI_A5mIqoog0H
0uV987P9yw1wFfsmg7z-Y2Ed7Blp-zLOvXEQKU9FM-vjBnA
eiXTO21DNqFnCTQkLAoAtA
e8sZiRvKLPOUjmFwOYhvrZMQYzW1yglg6mTnazJU_rF7mXTBIieNZCd7hDr
lrdGSxqqUgh6N1O2QBLygf2PtWDmHHjn1aLncx6qlGf0UOxCCXUBfBIhZgF
H5YX1i3_VSsNUDEoIKTGA21EnamOqa1A
WQzHj3j30Qo7VakMM42t-X1omQVGyebd3No9ZFGPQNUwEWONjIcZ89_wFBh
ZFddkc8i_qtXi-9XPmSVei3A_Jw
Then the sending agent performs step 5 and sends the following:
Miller Expires August 29, 2013 [Page 28]
Internet-Draft XMPP E2E February 2013
eyJhbGciOiJSU0EtT0FFUCIsImVuYyI6IkEyNTZDQkMrSFM1MTIiLCJraWQ
iOiJyb21lb0Btb250ZWd1ZS5saXQvZ2FyZGVuIn0
UeoVeGcZP-VsLu1PVj3NNWkmmEF7H2Nl_mHWscOuT_vYn-4ub2NEnRy4dzy
ycgxny6jmRPpNiGJB6AfI4TYZvrjig5dubv4uG7phCvKYVI3uaUU58Fc9H_
o-BTmNv2rUT-RGt6YYLW97ZJp5ZcA2l-KxykcxaRYC4Sv_UOS3Kqo0sVx5u
7tolE6SbMnUHetg91Gc9pVVa1XX-wz4ZrcA6V8zf8pCtmc4WyDMFx8RYYXR
_5Qvax-TzOJUL2eAr3OQsf3KNh58WvvzcwAKTmR214QmZCxI_A5mIqoog0H
0uV987P9yw1wFfsmg7z-Y2Ed7Blp-zLOvXEQKU9FM-vjBnA
eiXTO21DNqFnCTQkLAoAtA
e8sZiRvKLPOUjmFwOYhvrZMQYzW1yglg6mTnazJU_rF7mXTBIieNZCd7hDr
lrdGSxqqUgh6N1O2QBLygf2PtWDmHHjn1aLncx6qlGf0UOxCCXUBfBIhZgF
H5YX1i3_VSsNUDEoIKTGA21EnamOqa1A
WQzHj3j30Qo7VakMM42t-X1omQVGyebd3No9ZFGPQNUwEWONjIcZ89_wFBh
ZFddkc8i_qtXi-9XPmSVei3A_Jw
6. Mulitple Operations
The individual processes for encrypting and signing can be nested;
the output of each process a complete stanza that could then be
performed with the other. An implementation MUST be able to process
one level of nesting (e.g., an encrypted stanza nested within a
signed stanza), and SHOULD handle multiple levels within reasonable
limits for the receiving agent.
7. Inclusion and Checking of Timestamps
Timestamps are included to help prevent replay attacks. All
timestamps MUST conform to [XEP-0082] and be presented as UTC with no
Miller Expires August 29, 2013 [Page 29]
Internet-Draft XMPP E2E February 2013
offset, and SHOULD include the seconds and fractions of a second to
three digits. Absent a local adjustment to the sending agent's
perceived time or the underlying clock time, the sending agent MUST
ensure that the timestamps it sends to the receiver increase
monotonically (if necessary by incrementing the seconds fraction in
the timestamp if the clock returns the same time for multiple
requests). The following rules apply to the receiving agent:
o It MUST verify that the timestamp received is within an acceptable
range of the current time. It is RECOMMENDED that implementations
use an acceptable range of five minutes, although implementations
MAY use a smaller acceptable range.
o It SHOULD verify that the timestamp received is greater than any
timestamp received in the last 10 minutes which passed the
previous check.
o If any of the foregoing checks fails, the timestamp SHOULD be
presented to the receiving entity (human or application) marked as
"old timestamp", "future timestamp", or "decreasing timestamp",
and the receiving entity MAY return a stanza error to the sender.
Note the foregoing assumes the stanza is received while the receiving
agent is online; see Section 9 for offline storage considerations.
8. Interaction with Stanza Semantics
The following limitations and caveats apply:
o Undirected stanzas SHOULD NOT be encrypted. Such
stanzas are delivered to anyone the sender has authorized, and can
generate a large volume of key requests.
o Undirected stanzas MAY be signed. However, note that
signatures significantly increase the size of a stanza kind that
is often multiplexed across to many XMPP entities; this could have
large impacts on bandwidth and latency.
o Stanzas directed to multiplexing services (e.g., multi-user chat)
SHOULD NOT be encrypted, unless the sender has established an
acceptable trust relationship with the multiplexing service.
Miller Expires August 29, 2013 [Page 30]
Internet-Draft XMPP E2E February 2013
9. Interaction with Offline Storage
The server makes its best effort to deliver stanzas. When the
receiving agent is offline at the time of delivery, the server might
store the message until the recipient is next online (offline storage
does not apply to or stanzas, only
stanzas). The following need to be considered:
o If the sending agent is not also online when the message is
delivered to the receiving agent from offline storage, then the
decryption process fails for insufficient information as described
in Section 3.3.3.
o When performing the timestamp checks in Section 7, if the server
includes delayed delivery data as specified in [XEP-0203] for when
the server received the message, then the receiving agent SHOULD
use the delayed delivery timestmap rather than the current time.
10. Mandatory-to-Implement Cryptographic Algorithms
All algorithms that MUST be implemented for [JOSE-JWE] and [JOSE-JWS]
also MUST be implemented for this specification. However, this
specification further mandates the use of the following:
o MUST implement the "RSA1_5" JWE algorithm.
o MUST implement the "RS256" JWS algorithm.
11. Security Considerations
11.1. Storage of Encrypted Stanzas
The recipient's server might store any stanzas received
until the recipient is next available; this duration could be
anywhere from a few minutes to several months.
11.2. Re-use of Session Master Keys
A sender SHOULD NOT use the same SMK for stanzas intended for
different recipients, as determined by the localpart and domainpart
of the recipient's JID.
A sender MAY re-use a SMK for several stanzas to the same recipient.
In this case, the SID remains the same, but the sending agent MUST
Miller Expires August 29, 2013 [Page 31]
Internet-Draft XMPP E2E February 2013
generate a new CMK and IV for each encrypted stanza. The sender
SHOULD periodically generate a new SMK (and its associated SID);
however, this specification does not mandate any specific algorithms
or processes.
In the case of stanzas, a sending agent might generate a
new SMK each time it generates a new ThreadID, as outlined in
[XEP-0201].
12. IANA Considerations
12.1. XML Namespaces Name for e2e Data in XMPP
A number of URN sub-namespaces of encrypted and/or signed content for
the Extensible Messaging and Presence Protocol (XMPP) is defined as
follows.
URI: urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:xmpp-e2e:6
Specification: RFC XXXX
Description: This is an XML namespace name of encrypted and/or
signed content for the Extensible Messaging and Presence Protocol
as defined [[ this document ]].
Registrant Contact: IESG,
URI: urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:xmpp-e2e:6:encryption
Specification: RFC XXXX
Description: This is an XML namespace name signalling support for
encrypted content for the Extensible Messaging and Presence
Protocol as defined [[ this document ]].
Registrant Contact: IESG,
URI: urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:xmpp-e2e:6:signatures
Specification: RFC XXXX
Description: This is an XML namespace name signalling support for
signed content for the Extensible Messaging and Presence Protocol
as defined [[ this document ]].
Registrant Contact: IESG,
Miller Expires August 29, 2013 [Page 32]
Internet-Draft XMPP E2E February 2013
13. References
13.1. Normative References
[E2E-REQ] Saint-Andre, P., "Requirements for End-to-End Encryption
in the Extensible Messaging and Presence Protocol (XMPP)",
draft-saintandre-xmpp-e2e-requirements-01 (work in
progress), March 2010.
[JOSE-JWA]
Jones, M., "JSON Web Algorithms (JWA)", draft-ietf-jose-
json-web-algorithms-08 (work in progress), December 2012.
[JOSE-JWE]
Jones, M., Rescola, E., and J. Hildebrand, "JSON Web
Encryption (JWE)", draft-ietf-jose-json-web-encryption-08
(work in progress), December 2012.
[JOSE-JWK]
Jones, M., "JSON Web Key (JWK)", draft-ietf-jose-json-web-
key-08 (work in progress), December 2012.
[JOSE-JPSK]
Jones, M., "JSON Private and Symmetric Key", draft-jones-
jose-json-private-and-symmetric-key-00 (work in progress),
December 2012.
[JOSE-JWS]
Jones, M., Bradley, J., and N. Sakimura, "JSON Web
Signature (JWS)", draft-ietf-jose-json-web-signature-08
(work in progress), December 2012.
[JOSE-KEYPROTECT]
Miller, M., "Using JSON Web Encryption (JWE) for
Protecting JSON Web Key (JWK) Objects", draft-miller-jose-
jwe-protected-jwk-00 (work in progress), February 2013.
[RFC2119] Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate
Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, March 1997.
[RFC4648] Josefsson, S., "The Base16, Base32, and Base64 Data
Encodings", RFC 4648, October 2006.
[RFC4949] Shirey, R., "Internet Security Glossary, Version 2", RFC
4949, August 2007.
[RFC6120] Saint-Andre, P., "Extensible Messaging and Presence
Protocol (XMPP): Core", RFC 6120, March 2011.
Miller Expires August 29, 2013 [Page 33]
Internet-Draft XMPP E2E February 2013
[RFC6121] Saint-Andre, P., "Extensible Messaging and Presence
Protocol (XMPP): Instant Messaging and Presence", RFC
6121, March 2011.
[XEP-0030]
Eatmon, R., Hildebrand, J., Millard, P., and P. Saint-
Andre, "Service Discovery", XSF XEP 0030, June 2006.
[XEP-0082]
Saint-Andre, P., "XMPP Date and Time Profiles", XSF XEP
0082, May 2003.
[XEP-0115]
Hildebrand, J., Troncon, R., and P. Saint-Andre, "Entity
Capabilities", XSF XEP 0115, February 2008.
[XEP-0203]
Saint-Andre, P., "Delayed Delivery", XSF XEP 0203,
September 2009.
[XEP-0297]
Wild, M. and K. Smith, "Stanza Forwarding", XSF XEP 0297,
July 2012.
13.2. Informative References
[RFC3610] Whiting, D., Housley, R., and N. Ferguson, "Counter with
CBC-MAC (CCM)", RFC 3923, September 2003.
[RFC3923] Saint-Andre, P., "End-to-End Signing and Object Encryption
for the Extensible Messaging and Presence Protocol
(XMPP)", RFC 3923, October 2004.
[RFC4086] Eastlake, D., Schiller, J., and S. Crocker, "Randomness
Requirements for Security", RFC 4086, June 2005.
[XEP-0160]
Saint-Andre, P., "Best Practices for Handling Offline
Messages", XSF XEP 0160, January 2006.
[XEP-0201]
Saint-Andre, P., Paterson, I., and K. Smith, "Best
Practices for Message Threads", XSF XEP 0203, November
2010.
Appendix A. Schema for urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:xmpp-e2e:6
The following XML schema is descriptive, not normative.
Miller Expires August 29, 2013 [Page 34]
Internet-Draft XMPP E2E February 2013
Miller Expires August 29, 2013 [Page 35]
Internet-Draft XMPP E2E February 2013
Miller Expires August 29, 2013 [Page 36]
Internet-Draft XMPP E2E February 2013
Appendix B. Acknowledgements
Thanks to Richard Barnes, Andrew Biggs, and Ben Schumacher for their
feedback.
Author's Address
Matthew Miller
Cisco Systems, Inc.
1899 Wynkoop Street, Suite 600
Denver, CO 80202
USA
Phone: +1-303-308-3204
Email: mamille2@cisco.com
Miller Expires August 29, 2013 [Page 37]