Internet Engineering Task Force | A. Pelov, Ed. |
Internet-Draft | Acklio |
Intended status: Informational | L. Toutain, Ed. |
Expires: June 18, 2016 | Telecom Bretagne |
Y. Delibie, Ed. | |
Kerlink | |
A. Minaburo, Ed. | |
Consultant | |
December 16, 2015 |
YANG module for LoRa Networks
draft-pelov-yang-lora-00
This document presents a YANG module definition for managing LoRa-based devices.
This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79.
Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF). Note that other groups may also distribute working documents as Internet-Drafts. The list of current Internet-Drafts is at http://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/.
Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."
This Internet-Draft will expire on June 18, 2016.
Copyright (c) 2015 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the document authors. All rights reserved.
This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal Provisions Relating to IETF Documents (http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of publication of this document. Please review these documents carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect to this document. Code Components extracted from this document must include Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as described in the Simplified BSD License.
This document provides a YANG module description for managing a LoRa endpoints.
SemTech [LoRa] (c) is a low-rate, low-power, long-range radio technology. It could be used as a base radio technology for building Low-Rate Wide-Area Networks (LR-WAN), also known as LPWA (Low-Power Wide Area). SemTech [LoRa] (c) has the following characteristics:
The management of LoRa-based devices can be done through a standard approach, compatible with the best network-operator practices, namely NETCONF or RESTCONF. A formal definition of the parameters and the values to be managed is thus required, which can be done with the YANG module language. The following document presents a YANG module definition for managing a LoRa-based end-device.
The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT", "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described in RFC 2119 [RFC2119].
The data model has the following structure for Lora configuration:
+- RW lora +- RW Lora Device +- RW Mode | +- RW Channel Bandwidth enumeration | +- RW Coding Rate enumeration | +- RW Spreading Factor int8 +- Physical Layer | +- RW Preamblelength int32 | +- RW Channel Frequency Range enumeration | +- RW Channel int8 | +- RW SymbolTimeout int32 +- MAC Layer +- RW FrPayloadEncryption boolean +- RW Delay int32 +- RW FixlengthPayloadOn boolean
The data model defines a state container Mode which include the three principal characteristics of the LoRA interface which determine the parameters of the channel
Figure 1
This model imports typedefs from [RFC6991].
<CODE BEGINS> file "ietf-pelov@2015-10-10.yang" module lora { namespace "urn:lora"; prefix lo; import ietf-interfaces { prefix if; } organization "Acklio"; contact "Alexander Pelov a@ackl.io"; "Ana Minaburo ana@minaburo.com"; description "This module contains a collection of YANG definitions for configuring the LORA () network interface. Copyright (c) 2015 IETF Trust and the persons identified as authors of the code. All right reserved. Redistribution and use in source binary forms, with or without modification, is permitted pursuant to, and subject to the license terms contained in, the Simplified BSD License Relating to IETF Documents (http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) This version of this YANG module is part of draft-pelov-yang-lora-00; see the draft itself for full legal notices."; revision 2015-11-01 { description "Initial Description"; reference "LoRa MAC Class A Specification R3.1 by Semtech"; } grouping mode { leaf channel-bandwidth { type enumeration { enum 125 { value 0; } enum 150 { value 1; } enum 500 { value 2; } } } leaf coding-rate { type enumeration { enum 4_5 { value 1; } enum 4_6 { value 2; } enum 4_7 { value 3; } enum 4_b { value 4; } } } leaf spreading-factor { type uint8 { range "6 .. 12"; } } } augment "/if:interfaces/if:interface" { // To be defined later when "if:type = 'ianaift:lora'"; container lora { uses mode; container physical-layer { leaf preamble-length { type int32; default 7; } leaf channel-frequency-range { mandatory true; type enumeration { enum europe; enum usa; enum japan; enum china; } } leaf channel { type uint8 { range "0..10"; } } leaf symbol-timeout { type uint32; } } container mac-layer { leaf payload-encryption { type boolean; default "false"; } leaf delay { type int32; } leaf fixed-length-payload { type boolean; default "false"; } } } } } <CODE ENDS>
The data model defines a state container Mode which include the three principal characteristics of the LoRA interface which determine the parameters of the channel
Figure 2
This memo includes no request to IANA.
All drafts are required to have a security considerations section. See RFC 3552 [RFC3552] for a guide. TO DO
[RFC2119] | Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, DOI 10.17487/RFC2119, March 1997. |
[RFC7252] | Shelby, Z., Hartke, K. and C. Bormann, "The Constrained Application Protocol (CoAP)", RFC 7252, DOI 10.17487/RFC7252, June 2014. |
[IEEE.802-15.4k] | Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, "Low-Rate Wireless Personal Area Networks (LR-WPANs) - Amendment 5: Physical Layer Specifications for Low Energy, Critical Infrastructure Monitoring Networks., IEEE 802.15.4k", IEEE Standard 802.15.4, 2013. |
[LoRa] | Semtech, "https://web.archive.org/web/20150510011904/https://www.semtech.com/wireless-rf/lora.html", May 2015. |
[LTN001] | European Telecommunications Standards Institute, "Low Throughput Networks (LTN); Use Cases for Low Throughput Networks, ETSI GS LTN 001", IEEE ETSI GS LTN 001, 2014. |
[LTN003] | European Telecommunications Standards Institute, "Low Throughput Networks (LTN); Protocols and Interfaces, ETSI GS LTN 003", IEEE ETSI GS LTN 003, 2014. |
[RFC3552] | Rescorla, E. and B. Korver, "Guidelines for Writing RFC Text on Security Considerations", BCP 72, RFC 3552, DOI 10.17487/RFC3552, July 2003. |
[SigFox] | SigFox, "https://web.archive.org/web/20150628225901/http://www.sigfox.com/en/#!/technology", June 2015. |