OSPF | P. Psenak, Ed. |
Internet-Draft | N. Kumar |
Intended status: Standards Track | IJ. Wijnands |
Expires: April 27, 2015 | Cisco |
A. Dolganow | |
Alcatel-Lucent | |
T. Przygienda | |
Ericsson | |
J. Zhang | |
Juniper Networks, Inc. | |
S. Aldrin | |
Huawei Technologies | |
October 24, 2014 |
OSPF Extensions For BIER
draft-psenak-ospf-bier-extensions-01.txt
Bit Index Explicit Replication (BIER) is an architecture that provides optimal multicast forwarding through a "BIER domain" without requiring intermediate routers to maintain any multicast related per-flow state. BIER also does not require any explicit tree-building protocol for its operation. A multicast data packet enters a BIER domain at a "Bit-Forwarding Ingress Router" (BFIR), and leaves the BIER domain at one or more "Bit-Forwarding Egress Routers" (BFERs). The BFIR router adds a BIER header to the packet. The BIER header contains a bit-string in which each bit represents exactly one BFER to forward the packet to. The set of BFERs to which the multicast packet needs to be forwarded is expressed by setting the bits that correspond to those routers in the BIER header.
This document describes the OSPF protocol extension required for BIER with MPLS encapsulation.
This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79.
Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF). Note that other groups may also distribute working documents as Internet-Drafts. The list of current Internet-Drafts is at http://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/.
Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."
This Internet-Draft will expire on April 27, 2015.
Copyright (c) 2014 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the document authors. All rights reserved.
This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal Provisions Relating to IETF Documents (http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of publication of this document. Please review these documents carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect to this document. Code Components extracted from this document must include Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as described in the Simplified BSD License.
Bit Index Explicit Replication (BIER) is an architecture that provides optimal multicast forwarding through a "BIER domain" without requiring intermediate routers to maintain any multicast related per-flow state. Neither does BIER explicitly require a tree-building protocol for its operation. A multicast data packet enters a BIER domain at a "Bit-Forwarding Ingress Router" (BFIR), and leaves the BIER domain at one or more "Bit-Forwarding Egress Routers" (BFERs). The BFIR router adds a BIER header to the packet. The BIER header contains a bit-string in which each bit represents exactly one BFER to forward the packet to. The set of BFERs to which the multicast packet needs to be forwarded is expressed by setting the bits that correspond to those routers in the BIER header.
BIER architecture requires routers participating in BIER within a given BIER domain to exchange some BIER specific information among themselves. BIER architecture allows link-state routing protocols to perform the distribution of these information. In this document we describe extensions to OSPF to distribute BIER specific information for the case where BIER uses MPLS encapsulation as described in [I-D.wijnands-mpls-bier-encapsulation].
The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT", "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described in [RFC2119].
All the BIER specific information that a BIER router needs to advertise to other BIER routers are associated with the BFR-Prefix, a unique (within a given BIER domain), routable IP address that is assign to each BIER router as described in section 2 of [I-D.wijnands-bier-architecture].
Given that the BIER information is associated with the prefix, the OSPF Extended Prefix Opaque LSA [I-D.ietf-ospf-prefix-link-attr] is used to flood BIER related information.
A new Sub-TLV of the Extended Prefix TLV (defined in [I-D.ietf-ospf-prefix-link-attr]) is defined for distributing BIER information. The new Sub-TLV is called BIER Sub-TLV. Multiple BIER Sub-TLVs may be included in the Extended Prefix TLV.
BIER Sub-TLV has the following format:
0 1 2 3 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | Type | Length | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | BS Length | MT-ID | BFR-id | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | Sub-TLVs (variable) | +- -+ | |
If multiple BIER Sub-TLVs are present, all having the same BS Length and MT-ID values, first one MUST be used and subsequent ones MUST be ignored.
BIER MPLS Encapsulation Sub-TLV is a sub-TLV of the BIER Sub-TLV. BIER MPLS Encapsulation Sub-TLVIt is used in order to advertise MPLS specific information used for BIER. It MUST appear only once in the BIER Sub-TLV.
BIER MPLS Encapsulation Sub-TLV has the following format:
0 1 2 3 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | Type | Length | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ |Lbl Range Size | Label Range Base | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
Flooding scope of the OSPF Extended Prefix Opaque LSA [I-D.ietf-ospf-prefix-link-attr] that is used for advertising BIER Sub TLV is set to area. If (and only if) a single BIER domain contains multiple OSPF areas, OSPF must propagate BIER information between areas. The following procedure is used in order to propagate BIER related information between areas:
Implementations must assure that malformed TLV and Sub-TLV permutations do not result in errors which cause hard OSPF failures.
The document requests two new allocations from the OSPF Extended Prefix sub-TLV registry as defined in [I-D.ietf-ospf-prefix-link-attr].
The authors would like to thank Rajiv Asati, Christian Martin, Greg Shepherd and Eric Rosen for their contribution.
[I-D.ietf-ospf-prefix-link-attr] | Psenak, P., Gredler, H., Shakir, R., Henderickx, W., Tantsura, J. and A. Lindem, "OSPFv2 Prefix/Link Attribute Advertisement", Internet-Draft draft-ietf-ospf-prefix-link-attr-01, September 2014. |
[I-D.wijnands-bier-architecture] | Wijnands, I., Rosen, E., Dolganow, A. and T. Przygienda, "Multicast using Bit Index Explicit Replication", Internet-Draft draft-wijnands-bier-architecture-00, September 2014. |
[I-D.wijnands-mpls-bier-encapsulation] | Wijnands, I., Rosen, E., Dolganow, A. and J. Tantsura, "Encapsulation for Bit Index Explicit Replication in MPLS Networks", Internet-Draft draft-wijnands-mpls-bier-encapsulation-00, September 2014. |
[RFC2119] | Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, March 1997. |
[RFC4915] | Psenak, P., Mirtorabi, S., Roy, A., Nguyen, L. and P. Pillay-Esnault, "Multi-Topology (MT) Routing in OSPF", RFC 4915, June 2007. |