Network Working Group | P. Saint-Andre |
Internet-Draft | Cisco Systems, Inc. |
Intended status: Standards Track | E. Gavita |
Expires: October 13, 2013 | N. Hossain |
S. Loreto | |
Ericsson | |
April 11, 2013 |
Interworking between the Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) and the Extensible Messaging and Presence Protocol (XMPP): One-to-One Text Chat
draft-saintandre-sip-xmpp-chat-05
This document defines a bidirectional protocol mapping for the exchange of instant messages in the context of a one-to-one chat session between a user of the Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) and a user of the Extensible Messaging and Presence Protocol (XMPP). Specifically for SIP text chat, this document specifies a mapping to the Message Session Relay Protocol (MSRP).
This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79.
Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF). Note that other groups may also distribute working documents as Internet-Drafts. The list of current Internet-Drafts is at http://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/.
Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."
This Internet-Draft will expire on October 13, 2013.
Copyright (c) 2013 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the document authors. All rights reserved.
This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal Provisions Relating to IETF Documents (http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of publication of this document. Please review these documents carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect to this document. Code Components extracted from this document must include Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as described in the Simplified BSD License.
Both the Session Initiation Protocol [RFC3261] and the Extensible Messaging and Presence Protocol [RFC6120] can be used for the purpose of one-to-one text chat over the Internet. To ensure interworking between these technologies, it is important to define bidirectional protocol mappings.
The architectural assumptions underlying such protocol mappings are provided in [I-D.saintandre-sip-xmpp-core], including mapping of addresses and error conditions. This document specifies mappings for one-to-one text chat sessions (sometimes called "session-mode" messaging); in particular, this document specifies mappings between XMPP messages of type "chat" and the Message Session Relay Protocol [RFC4975]. Mappings for single instant messages and groupchat are provided in separate documents.
The approach taken here is to directly map syntax and semantics from one protocol to another. The mapping described herein depends on the protocols defined in the following specifications:
In SIMPLE, a chat session is formally negotiated just as any other session type is using SIP. By contrast, a one-to-one chat "session" in XMPP is an informal construct and is not formally negotiated: a user simply sends a message of type "chat" to a contact, the contact then replies to the message, and the sum total of such messages exchanged during a defined period of time is considered to be a chat session. To overcome the disparity between these approaches, a gateway that wishes to map between SIP and XMPP for one-to-one chat sessions needs to maintain some additional state, as described below.
The discussion venue for this document is the mailing list of the DISPATCH WG; visit https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dispatch for subscription information and discussion archives.
The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT", "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "NOT RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described in [RFC2119].
In XMPP, the "informal session" approach is to simply send someone a <message/> of type "chat" without starting any session negotiation ahead of time (as described in [RFC6121]). The XMPP "informal session" approach maps very well into a SIP MESSAGE request, as described in [I-D.saintandre-sip-xmpp-core]. However, the XMPP informal session approach can also be mapped to MSRP if the XMPP-to-SIP gateway maintains additional state.
The order of events is as follows.
XMPP User GW SIP User | | | |(F1) (XMPP) Chat message | | |------------------------->| | | |(F2) (SIP) INVITE | | |------------------------->| | |(F3) (SIP) 200 OK | | |<-------------------------| | |(F4) (SIP) ACK | | |------------------------->| | |(F5) (MSRP) SEND | | |------------------------->| | |(F6) (MSRP) A reply | | |<-------------------------| |(F7) (XMPP) A reply | | |<-------------------------| | | | | . . . . . . . . . | | | | |(F8) (SIP) BYE | | |<-------------------------| | |(F9) (SIP) 200 OK | | |------------------------->| | | |
First the XMPP user would generate an XMPP chat message.
Example: (F1) Juliet sends an XMPP message
<message from='juliet@example.com/balcony' to='romeo@example.net' type='chat'> <thread>711609sa</thread> <body>Art thou not Romeo, and a Montague?</body> </message>
The local SIP-to-XMPP gateway at the SIMPLE server would then determine if Romeo supports MSRP. If so, the SIP-to-XMPP gateway would initiate an MSRP session with Romeo on Juliet's behalf.
Example: (F2) Gateway starts a formal session on behalf of Juliet
INVITE sip:romeo@example.net SIP/2.0 To: <sip:romeo@example.net> From: <sip:juliet@example.com>;gr=balcony Subject: Open chat with Juliet? Call-ID: 711609sa Content-Type: application/sdp c=IN IP4 x2s.example.com m=message 7654 TCP/MSRP * a=accept-types:text/plain a=lang:en a=lang:it a=path:msrp://x2s.example.com:7654/jshA7weztas;tcp
Here we assume that Romeo accepts the MSRP session request.
Example: (F3) Romeo accepts the request
SIP/2.0 200 OK To: <sip:romeo@example.net>;gr=orchard From: <sip:juliet@example.com>;gr=balcony Call-ID: 711609sa Content-Type: application/sdp c=IN IP4 s2x.example.net m=message 12763 TCP/MSRP * a=accept-types:text/plain a=lang:it a=path:msrp://s2x.example.net:12763/kjhd37s2s20w2a;tcp
The XMPP-to-SIP gateway then acknowledges the session acceptance on behalf of Juliet.
Example: (F4) Gateway sends ACK to Romeo's UA
ACK sip:romeo@example.net SIP/2.0 To: <sip:romeo@example.net>;gr=orchard From: <sip:juliet@example.com>;gr=balcony Call-ID: 711609sa
The XMPP-to-SIP gateway then transforms the original XMPP chat message into MSRP.
Example: (F5) Gateway transforms XMPP message to MSRP
MSRP a786hjs2 SEND From-Path: msrp://x2s.example.com:7654/jshA7weztas;tcp To-Path: msrp://s2x.example.net:12763/kjhd37s2s20w2a;tcp Message-ID: 87652491 Byte-Range: 1-25/25 Content-Type: text/plain Art thou not Romeo, and a Montague? -------a786hjs2$
Romeo can then send a reply using his MSRP user agent.
Example: (F6) Romeo sends a reply
MSRP a786hjs2 SEND To-Path: msrp://x2s.example.com:7654/jshA7weztas;tcp From-Path: msrp://s2x.example.net:12763/kjhd37s2s20w2a;tcp Message-ID: 87652491 Byte-Range: 1-25/25 Failure-Report: no Content-Type: text/plain Neither, fair saint, if either thee dislike. -------a786hjs2$
The SIP-to-XMPP gateway would then transform that message into appropriate XMPP syntax for routing to the intended recipient.
Example: (F7) Gateway transforms MSRP message to XMPP
<message from='romeo@example.net/orchard' to='juliet@example.com/balcony' type='chat'> <thread>711609sa</thread> <body>Neither, fair saint, if either thee dislike.</body> </message>
When the MSRP user wishes to end the chat session, the user's MSRP client sends a SIP BYE.
Example: (F8) Romeo terminates the chat session
BYE juliet@example.com sip: SIP/2.0 Max-Forwards: 70 From: <sip:romeo@example.net>;tag=087js To: <sip:juliet@example.com>;tag=786 Call-ID: 711609sa Cseq: 1 BYE Content-Length: 0
The BYE is then acknowledged by the XMPP-to-SIP gateway.
Example: (F9) Gateway acknowledges termination
SIP/2.0 200 OK From: <sip:juliet@example.com>;tag=786 To: <sip:romeo@example.net>;tag=087js Call-ID: 711609sa CSeq: 1 BYE Content-Length: 0
When an MSRP client sends messages through a gateway to an XMPP client that does not support formal sessinos, the order of events is as follows.
SIP User GW XMPP User | | | |(F1)(SIP) INVITE | | |------------------------>| | |(F2)(SIP) 200 OK | | |<------------------------| | |(F3)(SIP) ACK | | |------------------------>| | |(F4)(MSRP) SEND | | |------------------------>| | | |(F5)(XMPP) A chat message | | |------------------------->| | |(F6)(XMPP) A reply | | |<-------------------------| | | | |(F7)(MSRP) SEND | | |<------------------------| | | | | . . . . . . . . . | | | |(F8)(SIP) BYE | | |------------------------>| | |(F9)(SIP) 200 OK | | |<------------------------| | | | |
Example: (F1) SIP user starts the session
INVITE sip:juliet@example.com SIP/2.0 To: <sip:juliet@example.com> From: <sip:romeo@example.net>;gr=orchard Subject: Open chat with Romeo? Call-ID: 742507no Content-Type: application/sdp c=IN IP4 s2x.example.net m=message 7313 TCP/MSRP * a=accept-types:text/plain a=lang:en a=lang:it a=path:msrp://s2x.example.net:7313/ansp71weztas;tcp
Example: (F2) Gateway accepts session on Juliet's behalf
SIP/2.0 200 OK To: <sip:juliet@example.com>;gr=balcony From: <sip:romeo@example.net>;gr=orchard Call-ID: 742507no Content-Type: application/sdp c=IN IP4 x2s.example.com m=message 8763 TCP/MSRP * a=accept-types:text/plain a=lang:it a=path:msrp://x2s.example.com:8763/lkjh37s2s20w2a;tcp
Example: (F3) Romeo sends ACK
ACK sip:juliet@example.com SIP/2.0 To: <sip:juliet@example.com>;gr=balcony From: <sip:romeo@example.net>;gr=orchard Call-ID: 742507no
Example: (F4) Romeo sends a message
MSRP ad49kswow SEND To-Path: msrp://x2s.example.com:8763/lkjh37s2s20w2a;tcp From-Path: msrp://s2x.example.net:7313/ansp71weztas;tcp Message-ID: 44921zaqwsx Byte-Range: 1-32/32 Failure-Report: no Content-Type: text/plain I take thee at thy word ... -------ad49kswow$
Example: (F5) Romeo sends a message (XMPP translation)
<message from='romeo@example.net' to='juliet@example.com' type='chat'> <thread>742507no</thread> <body>I take thee at thy word ...</body> </message>
Example: (F6) Juliet sends a reply
<message from='juliet@example.com' to='romeo@example.net' type='chat'> <thread>711609sa</thread> <body>What man art thou ...?</body> </message>
Example: (F8) Gateway transforms XMPP message to MSRP
MSRP a786hjs2 SEND To-Path: msrp://s2x.example.net:7313/jshA7weztas;tcp From-Path: msrp://x2s.example.com:8763/lkjh37s2s20w2a;tcp Message-ID: 87652491 Byte-Range: 1-25/25 Failure-Report: no Content-Type: text/plain What man art thou ...? -------a786hjs2$
Example: (F9) Romeo terminates the session
BYE juliet@example.com sip: SIP/2.0 Max-Forwards: 70 From: <sip:romeo@example.net>;gr=orchard To: <sip:juliet@example.com>;gr=balcony Call-ID: 742507no Cseq: 1 BYE Content-Length: 0
Example: (F10) Gateway acknowledges the termination of the session on behalf of XMPP user
SIP/2.0 200 OK From: <sip:romeo@example.net>;gr=orchard To: <sip:juliet@example.com>;gr=balcony Call-ID: 742507no CSeq: 1 BYE
Detailed security considerations for instant messaging protocols are given in [RFC2779], for SIP-based instant messaging in [RFC3428] (see also [RFC3261]), and for XMPP-based instant messaging in [RFC6121] (see also [RFC6120]).
This document specifies methods for exchanging instant messages through a gateway that translates between SIP and XMPP. Such a gateway MUST be compliant with the minimum security requirements of the instant messaging protocols for which it translates (i.e., SIP and XMPP). The addition of gateways to the security model of instant messaging specified in [RFC2779] introduces some new risks. In particular, end-to-end security properties (especially confidentiality and integrity) between instant messaging user agents that interface through a SIMPLE-XMPP gateway can be provided only if common formats are supported. Specification of those common formats is out of scope for this document, although it is recommended to use [RFC3862] for instant messages.
This document requests no actions of IANA.
[RFC2779] | Day, M., Aggarwal, S. and J. Vincent, "Instant Messaging / Presence Protocol Requirements", RFC 2779, February 2000. |
[RFC3428] | Campbell, B., Rosenberg, J., Schulzrinne, H., Huitema, C. and D. Gurle, "Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) Extension for Instant Messaging", RFC 3428, December 2002. |
Some text in this document was borrowed from [I-D.saintandre-sip-xmpp-core].
Thanks to Adrian Georgescu, Saul Ibarra, and Tory Patnoe for their feedback.