TOC |
|
By submitting this Internet-Draft, each author represents that any applicable patent or other IPR claims of which he or she is aware have been or will be disclosed, and any of which he or she becomes aware will be disclosed, in accordance with Section 6 of BCP 79.
Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF), its areas, and its working groups. Note that other groups may also distribute working documents as Internet-Drafts.
Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference material or to cite them other than as “work in progress.”
The list of current Internet-Drafts can be accessed at http://www.ietf.org/ietf/1id-abstracts.txt.
The list of Internet-Draft Shadow Directories can be accessed at http://www.ietf.org/shadow.html.
This Internet-Draft will expire on June 13, 2008.
A method is described by which a Device is able to provide measurement data to a LIS within a HELD request. Measurement information are observations about the position of a Device, which could be data about network attachment or about the physical environment around the LIS. When a LIS generates location information for a device, information from the device can improve the accuracy of the location estimate. A basic set of measurements are defined, including common modes of network attachment as well as assisted Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) parameters.
1.
Introduction
2.
Conventions used in this document
3.
Location Measurements in HELD Requests
4.
Measurement Types
4.1.
LLDP Measurements
4.2.
DHCP Measurements
4.3.
802.11 SSID Measurement
4.4.
GNSS Measurements
4.4.1.
GNSS System and Signal
4.4.2.
Time
4.4.3.
Per-Satellite Measurements
4.5.
DSL Measurements
4.5.1.
L2TP Measurements
4.5.2.
RADIUS Measurements
4.5.3.
Ethernet VLAN Tag Measurements
4.5.4.
ATM Virtual Circuit Measurements
5.
Measurement Schema
6.
Security Considerations
6.1.
Expiry Time on Measurements
7.
IANA Considerations
7.1.
IANA Registry for GNSS Types
7.2.
URN Sub-Namespace Registration for urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:held:lm
7.3.
XML Schema Registration for Measurement Schema
7.4.
URN Sub-Namespace Registration for urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:ip
7.5.
XML Schema Registration for IP Address Type Schema
8.
References
8.1.
Normative References
8.2.
Informative References
§
Authors' Addresses
§
Intellectual Property and Copyright Statements
TOC |
HELD (Barnes, M., Winterbottom, J., Thomson, M., and B. Stark, “HTTP Enabled Location Delivery (HELD),” August 2009.) [I‑D.ietf‑geopriv‑http‑location‑delivery] describes a means for a device to request location information from an access network. The LIS is expected to be able to retrieve the information necessary to generate location information. As a part of the access network, the LIS is able to acquire measurements from network devices within the network to determine location information. The LIS also has access to information about the network topology that can be used to turn measurement data into location information. However, this information can be enhanced with information acquired from the Device itself.
This document describes a means for the Device to report location measurements to the LIS. These measurements can be used by the LIS to improve the quality of the location estimate it produces.
TOC |
The terms LIS and Device are used in this document in a manner consistent with the usage in [I‑D.ietf‑geopriv‑http‑location‑delivery] (Barnes, M., Winterbottom, J., Thomson, M., and B. Stark, “HTTP Enabled Location Delivery (HELD),” August 2009.).
This document also uses the following definitions:
- Location Measurement:
- An observation about the physical properties of a particular device's network access. A location measurement can be used to determine the location of a device; however, location measurements do not identify a Device. Location measurements can change with time if the location of the Device also changes.
A location measurement does not necessarily contain location information but it can be used in combination with contextual knowledge of the network, or algorithms to derive location information. Examples of location measurements: radio signal strength or timing measurements, Ethernet switch and port identifiers.
Location measurements can be considered sighting information, based on the definition in [RFC3693] (Cuellar, J., Morris, J., Mulligan, D., Peterson, J., and J. Polk, “Geopriv Requirements,” February 2004.).- Location Estimate:
- The result of location determination, a location estimate is an approximation of where the Device is located. Location estimates are subject to uncertainty, which arise from measurement errors.
- GNSS:
- Global Navigation Satellite System. A satellite-based system that provides positioning and time information. For example, the US Global Positioning System (GPS) or the European Galileo system.
The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT", "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described in [RFC2119] (Bradner, S., “Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate Requirement Levels,” March 1997.).
TOC |
This document defines a standard container for the conveyance of measurement parameters in HELD requests. This is an XML container that identifies measurements by type and allows the Device to provide any measurements it has.
The simplest example of measurement conveyance is illustrated by the example message in Figure 1 (HELD Location Request with Measurement). This shows a HELD location request message with an Ethernet switch and port measurement taken using LLDP (IEEE, “IEEE Standard for Local and Metropolitan area networks, Station and Media Access Control Connectivity Discovery,” June 2005.) [IEEE.8021AB].
<locationRequest xmlns="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:geopriv:held"> <locationType exact="true">civic</locationType> <measurements xmlns="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:geopriv:held:lm"> <lldp> <chassis type="4">0a01003c</chassis> <port type="6">c2</port> </lldp> </measurements> </locationRequest>
Figure 1: HELD Location Request with Measurement |
Measurements that the LIS does not support or understand can be ignored.
Multiple measurements, either of the same type or from different sources can be included in the measurements element. The measurements element SHOULD NOT be repeated.
The LIS SHOULD validate any location information derived based on Device-provided measurements. Any measurements that produce location information that is significantly different to location information that the LIS is able to generate independently SHOULD be discarded. The allowable degree of difference is left to local configuration or implementation.
Using measurements is at the discretion of the LIS, but the method parameter in the PIDF-LO SHOULD be adjusted reflect the method used.
TOC |
This document defines measurements for a range of common network types.
- Note:
- Not all of these measurement types are provided by the Device; they may be acquired by other hosts in situations such as those described in [I‑D.winterbottom‑geopriv‑lis2lis‑req] (Winterbottom, J. and S. Norreys, “LIS to LIS Protocol Requirements,” November 2007.).
TOC |
LLDP messages are sent between adjacent nodes in an 802.x network (e.g. wired Ethernet, WiFi, WiMAX). These messages all contain identification information for the sending node, which can be used to determine location information. A Device that receives LLDP messages can report this information as a measurement to the LIS, which is then able to use the measurement in determining the location of the Device.
The Device MUST report the values directly as they were provided by the adjacent node. Attempting to adjust the type of identifier is likely to cause the measurement to be useless.
Where a Device has received LLDP messages from multiple adjacent nodes, it should provide information extracted from those messages by repeating the lldp element.
An example of an LLDP measurement is shown in Figure 2 (LLDP Measurement Example). This shows an adjacent node (chassis) that is identified by the IP address 192.0.2.45 and the port on that node is numbered using an agent circuit ID (Patrick, M., “DHCP Relay Agent Information Option,” January 2001.) [RFC3046] of 162.
<measurements xmlns="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:geopriv:held:lm"> <lldp> <chassis type="4">c000022d</chassis> <port type="6">a2</port> </lldp> </measurements>
Figure 2: LLDP Measurement Example |
802.x Devices that are able to obtain information about adjacent network switches and their attachment to them by other means may use this data type to convey this information.
TOC |
The DHCP Relay Agent Information option (Patrick, M., “DHCP Relay Agent Information Option,” January 2001.) [RFC3046] provides measurement information about a Device. This measurement information can be included in the dhcp-rai element.
The elements in the DHCP relay agent information options are opaque data types assigned by the DHCP relay agent. The three items are all optional: circuit identifier (circuit, [RFC3046] (Patrick, M., “DHCP Relay Agent Information Option,” January 2001.)), remote identifier (remote, [RFC3046] (Patrick, M., “DHCP Relay Agent Information Option,” January 2001.), [RFC4649] (Volz, B., “Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol for IPv6 (DHCPv6) Relay Agent Remote-ID Option,” August 2006.)) and subscriber identifier (subscriber, [RFC3993] (Johnson, R., Palaniappan, T., and M. Stapp, “Subscriber-ID Suboption for the Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol (DHCP) Relay Agent Option,” March 2005.), [RFC4580] (Volz, B., “Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol for IPv6 (DHCPv6) Relay Agent Subscriber-ID Option,” June 2006.)). The DHCPv6 remote identifier has an associated enterprise number (IANA, “Private Enterprise Numbers,” .) [IANA.enterprise] as an XML attribute.
<measurements xmlns="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:geopriv:held:lm"> <dhcp-rai> <giaddr>2001:DB8::215:c5ff:fee1:505e</giaddr> <remote enterprise="331">108b</remote> </dhcp-rai> </measurements>
Figure 3: DHCP Relay Agent Information Measurement Example |
TOC |
In WiFi, or 802.11, networks a Device might be able to provide the service set identifier (SSID) of the wireless network that it is attached to. This is provided using the ssid element, as shown in Figure 4 (802.11 SSID Measurement Example).
<measurements xmlns="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:geopriv:held:lm"> <ssid>wlan-home</ssid> </measurements>
Figure 4: 802.11 SSID Measurement Example |
TOC |
GNSS use orbiting satellites to transmit signals. A Device with a GNSS receiver is able to take measurements from the satellite signals. These measurements can be used to determine time and the location of the Device.
Determining location and time in autonomous GNSS receivers follows three steps:
- Signal acquisition:
- During the signal acquisition stage, the receiver searches for the repeating code that is sent by each GNSS satellite. Successful operation typically requires measurements for a minimum of 5 satellites. At this stage, measurement information is available to the device.
- Navigation message decode:
- Once the signal has been acquired, the receiver then receives information about the configuration of the satellite constellation. This information is broadcast by each satellite and is modulated with the base signal at a low rate; for instance, GPS sends this information at about 50 bits per second.
- Calculation:
- The measurement information is combined with the data on the satellite constellation to determine the location of the receiver and the current time.
A Device that uses a GNSS receiver is able to report measurements after the first stage of this process. A LIS can use these measurements to determine a location. In the case where there are fewer measurements available than the optimal minimum, the LIS might be able to use other sources of measurement information and combine the measurements to determine a position.
Note: The use of different sets of GNSS assistance data can reduce the amount of time required for the signal acquisition stage and obviate the need for the receiver to extract data on the satellite constellation. Provision of assistance data is outside the scope of this document.
Figure 5 (Example GNSS Measurement) shows an example GNSS measurement. The measurement shown is for the GPS system and includes measurements for three satellites only.
<measurements xmlns="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:geopriv:held:lm"> <gnss system="gps" signal="L1"> <time coarse="false">98375200</time> <sat num="19"> <doppler>499.9395</doppler><codephase>0.87595747</codephase> <cn0>45</cn0><err>0.5</err> </sat> <sat num="27"> <doppler>378.2657</doppler><codephase>0.56639479</codephase> <cn0>52</cn0><err>0.5</err> </sat> <sat num="20"> <doppler>-633.0309</doppler><codephase>0.57016835</codephase> <cn0>48</cn0><err>0.5</err> </sat> </gnss> </measurements>
Figure 5: Example GNSS Measurement |
Each gnss element represents a single set of GNSS measurement data, taken at a single point in time. Measurements taken at different times can be included in different gnss elements to enable iterative refinement of results.
GNSS measurement parameters are described in more detail in the following sections.
TOC |
The GNSS measurement structure is designed to be generic and to apply to different GNSS types. Different signals within those systems are also accounted for and can be measured separately.
The GNSS type determines the time system that is used. An indication of the type of system and signal can ensure that the LIS is able to correctly use measurements.
Measurements for multiple GNSS types and signals can be included by repeating the gnss element.
This document creates an IANA registry for GNSS types. Two satellite systems are registered by this document: GPS and Galileo. Details for the registry are included in Section 7.1 (IANA Registry for GNSS Types).
TOC |
Each set of GNSS measurements is taken at a specific point in time. The time element includes a relative time in milliseconds using the time system native to the satellite system.
For the GPS satellite system, the time element includes the time of week in milliseconds. For the Galileo system, the time element includes the time of day in milliseconds.
Alternatively, a specific instant of time can be specified using the abstime element. This element includes an ISO 8601 formatted date and time, which SHOULD be measured to within one millisecond.
The time element includes an attribute, coarse, that indicates whether or not the time was accurately recovered by the receiver. This parameter SHOULD be set to false if the receiver does not determine the time accurate to within a millisecond. If the coarse attribute is set to false, the actual time is derived from the other measurement data; typically this means that additional per-satellite measurements are required.
TOC |
Multiple satellites are included in each set of GNSS measurements using the sat element. Each satellite is identified by a number in the num attribute. The satellite number is consistent with the identifier used in the given GNSS.
Both the GPS and Galileo systems use satellite numbers between 1 and 64.
The GNSS receiver measures the following parameters for each satellite:
- doppler:
- The observed Doppler shift of the satellite signal, measured in meters per second. This is converted from a value in Hertz.
- codephase:
- The observed code phase for the satellite signal, measured in milliseconds. This is converted from a value in chips or wavelengths. Increasing values indicate increasing pseudoranges.
- cn0:
- The signal to noise ratio for the satellite signal, measured in decibel-Hertz (dB-Hz). The expected range is between 20 and 50 dB-Hz.
- err:
- The estimated RMS error for the code phase measurement; i.e. an estimate of code phase uncertainty. This value is measured in meters.
- mp:
- An estimation of the amount of error that multipath signals contribute in meters. This measurement parameter is optional.
- cq:
- An indication of the carrier quality. Two attributes are included: continuous may be either true or false; direct may be either direct or inverted. This measurement parameter is optional.
- adr:
- The accumulated Doppler range, measured in meters. This measurement parameter is optional and should not be included unless multiple sets of GNSS measurements are provided.
All values are converted from measures native to the satellite system to generic measures to ensure consistency of interpretation. Unless necessary, the schema does not constrain these values.
TOC |
Digital Subscriber Line (DSL) networks rely on a range of network technology. DSL deployments regularly require cooperation between multiple organizations. These fall into two broad categories: infrastructure providers and Internet service providers (ISPs). Infrastructure providers manage the bulk of the physical infrastructure including cabling. End users obtain their service from an ISP, which manages all aspects visible to the end user including IP address allocation and operation of a LIS. See [DSL.TR025] (Wang, R., “Core Network Architecture Recommendations for Access to Legacy Data Networks over ADSL,” September 1999.) and [DSL.TR101] (Cohen, A. and E. Shrum, “Migration to Ethernet-Based DSl Aggregation,” April 2006.) for further information on DSL network deployments.
Exchange of measurement information between these organizations is necessary for location information to be correctly generated. The ISP LIS needs to acquire location information from the infrastructure provider. However, the infrastructure provider has no knowledge of Device identifiers, it can only identify a stream of data that is sent to the ISP. This is resolved by passing measurement information relating to the Device to a LIS operated by the infrastructure provider.
TOC |
Layer 2 Tunneling Protocol (L2TP) is a common means of linking the infrastructure provider and the ISP. The infrastructure provider LIS requires a measurement that identifies a single L2TP tunnel, from which it can generate location information. Figure 6 (Example DSL L2TP Measurement) shows an example L2TP measurement.
<measurements xmlns="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:geopriv:held:lm"> <dsl> <l2tp> <src>192.0.2.10</src> <dest>192.0.2.61</dest> <session>528</session> </l2tp> </dsl> </measurements>
Figure 6: Example DSL L2TP Measurement |
TOC |
When authenticating network access, the infrastructure provider might employ RADIUS (Rigney, C., Willens, S., Rubens, A., and W. Simpson, “Remote Authentication Dial In User Service (RADIUS),” June 2000.) [RFC2865] proxying at the DSL Access Module (DSLAM) or Access Node (AN). These messages provide the ISP RADIUS server with an identifier for the DSLAM or AN, plus the slot and port that the Device is attached on. These data can be provided as a measurement, which allows the infrastructure provider LIS to generate location information.
The format of the AN, slot and port identifiers are not defined in the RADIUS protocol. Slot and port together identify a circuit on the AN, analagous to the circuit identifier in [RFC3046] (Patrick, M., “DHCP Relay Agent Information Option,” January 2001.). These items are provided directly, as they were in the RADIUS message. An example is shown in Figure 7 (Example DSL RADIUS Measurement).
<measurements xmlns="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:geopriv:held:lm"> <dsl> <an>AN-7692</an> <slot>3</slot> <port>06</port> </dsl> </measurements>
Figure 7: Example DSL RADIUS Measurement |
TOC |
For Ethernet-based DSL access networks, the DSL Access Module (DSLAM) or Access Node (AN) provide two VLAN tags on packets. A C-TAG is used to identify the incoming residential circuit, while the S-TAG is used to identify the DSLAM or AN. The C-TAG and S-TAG together can be used to identify a single point of network attachment. An example is shown in Figure 8 (Example DSL VLAN Tag Measurement).
<measurements xmlns="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:geopriv:held:lm"> <dsl> <stag>613</stag> <ctag>1097</ctag> </dsl> </measurements>
Figure 8: Example DSL VLAN Tag Measurement |
Alternatively, the C-TAG can be replaced by data on the slot and port that the Device is attached to. This information might be included in RADIUS requests that are proxied from the infrastructure provider to the ISP RADIUS server.
TOC |
An ATM virtual circuit can be employed between the ISP and infrastructure provider. Providing the virtual port ID (VPI) and virtual circuit ID (VCI) for the virtual circuit gives the infrastructure provider LIS the ability to identify a single data stream. A sample measurement is shown in Figure 9 (Example DSL ATM Measurement).
<measurements xmlns="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:geopriv:held:lm"> <dsl> <vpi>55</vpi> <vci>6323</vci> </dsl> </measurements>
Figure 9: Example DSL ATM Measurement |
TOC |
Note that the pattern rules in the following schema wrap due to length constraints in RFC. None of the patterns contain whitespace.
<?xml version="1.0"?> <xs:schema xmlns:lm="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:geopriv:held:lm" xmlns:xs="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema" targetNamespace="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:geopriv:held:lm" elementFormDefault="qualified" attributeFormDefault="unqualified"> <xs:annotation> <xs:appinfo source="urn:ietf:params:xml:schema:geopriv:held:lm"> HELD Capabilities </xs:appinfo> <xs:documentation source="http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfcXXXX.txt"> <!-- [[NOTE TO RFC-EDITOR: Please replace above URL with URL of published RFC and remove this note.]] --> This schema defines a framework for location measurements in HELD and several measurement formats. </xs:documentation> </xs:annotation> <xs:element name="measurements"> <xs:complexType> <xs:complexContent> <xs:restriction base="xs:anyType"> <xs:sequence> <xs:element ref="lm:lldp" minOccurs="0"/> <xs:element ref="lm:dhcp-rai" minOccurs="0"/> <xs:element ref="lm:ssid" minOccurs="0"/> <xs:element ref="lm:gnss" minOccurs="0"/> <xs:element ref="lm:dsl" minOccurs="0"/> <xs:any namespace="##other" processContents="lax" minOccurs="0" maxOccurs="unbounded"/> </xs:sequence> <xs:anyAttribute namespace="##any" processContents="lax"/> </xs:restriction> </xs:complexContent> </xs:complexType> </xs:element> <!-- LLDP --> <xs:element name="lldp" type="lm:lldpMeasurementType"/> <xs:complexType name="lldpMeasurementType"> <xs:complexContent> <xs:restriction base="xs:anyType"> <xs:sequence> <xs:element name="chassis" type="lm:lldpDataType"/> <xs:element name="port" type="lm:lldpDataType"/> <xs:any namespace="##other" processContents="lax" minOccurs="0" maxOccurs="unbounded"/> </xs:sequence> <xs:anyAttribute namespace="##any" processContents="lax"/> </xs:restriction> </xs:complexContent> </xs:complexType> <xs:complexType name="lldpDataType"> <xs:simpleContent> <xs:extension base="lm:lldpOctetStringType"> <xs:attribute name="type" type="lm:byteType" use="required"/> </xs:extension> </xs:simpleContent> </xs:complexType> <xs:simpleType name="lldpOctetStringType"> <xs:restriction base="xs:hexBinary"> <xs:minLength value="1"/> <xs:maxLength value="255"/> </xs:restriction> </xs:simpleType> <!-- DHCP Relay Agent Information Option --> <xs:element name="dhcp-rai" type="lm:dhcpType"/> <xs:complexType name="dhcpType"> <xs:complexContent> <xs:restriction base="xs:anyType"> <xs:sequence> <xs:element name="giaddr" type="lm:ipAddressType"/> <xs:element name="circuit" type="xs:hexBinary" minOccurs="0"/> <xs:element name="remote" type="lm:dhcpRemoteType" minOccurs="0"/> <xs:element name="subscriber" type="xs:hexBinary" minOccurs="0"/> <xs:any namespace="##other" processContents="lax" minOccurs="0" maxOccurs="unbounded"/> </xs:sequence> <xs:anyAttribute namespace="##any" processContents="lax"/> </xs:restriction> </xs:complexContent> </xs:complexType> <xs:complexType name="dhcpRemoteType"> <xs:simpleContent> <xs:extension base="xs:hexBinary"> <xs:attribute name="enterprise" type="xs:positiveInteger" use="optional"/> </xs:extension> </xs:simpleContent> </xs:complexType> <!-- 802.11 SSID --> <xs:element name="ssid" type="lm:ssidType"/> <xs:simpleType name="ssidType"> <xs:restriction base="xs:token"> <xs:maxLength value="32"/> </xs:restriction> </xs:simpleType> <!-- GNSS --> <xs:element name="gnss" type="lm:gnssMeasurementType"> <xs:unique name="gnssSatellite"> <xs:selector xpath="sat"/> <xs:field xpath="@num"/> </xs:unique> </xs:element> <xs:complexType name="gnssMeasurementType"> <xs:complexContent> <xs:restriction base="xs:anyType"> <xs:sequence> <xs:choice> <xs:element name="abstime" type="lm:gnssAbsoluteTime"/> <xs:element name="time" type="lm:gnssTime"/> </xs:choice> <xs:element name="sat" type="lm:gnssSatelliteType" minOccurs="1" maxOccurs="64"/> <xs:any namespace="##other" processContents="lax" minOccurs="0" maxOccurs="unbounded"/> </xs:sequence> <xs:attribute name="system" type="xs:token" use="required"/> <xs:attribute name="signal" type="xs:token"/> <xs:anyAttribute namespace="##other" processContents="lax"/> </xs:restriction> </xs:complexContent> </xs:complexType> <xs:complexType name="gnssAbsoluteTime"> <xs:simpleContent> <xs:extension base="xs:dateTime"> <xs:attribute name="coarse" type="xs:boolean" default="false"/> </xs:extension> </xs:simpleContent> </xs:complexType> <xs:complexType name="gnssTime"> <xs:simpleContent> <xs:extension base="lm:nonNegativeDecimal"> <xs:attribute name="coarse" type="xs:boolean" default="false"/> </xs:extension> </xs:simpleContent> </xs:complexType> <xs:complexType name="gnssSatelliteType"> <xs:complexContent> <xs:restriction base="xs:anyType"> <xs:sequence> <xs:element name="doppler" type="xs:decimal"/> <xs:element name="codephase" type="lm:nonNegativeDecimal"/> <xs:element name="cn0" type="xs:nonNegativeInteger"/> <xs:element name="err" type="lm:nonNegativeDecimal"/> <xs:element name="mp" type="xs:positiveInteger" minOccurs="0"/> <xs:element name="cq" type="lm:codePhaseQualityType" minOccurs="0"/> <xs:element name="adr" type="xs:decimal" minOccurs="0"/> </xs:sequence> <xs:attribute name="num" type="xs:positiveInteger" use="required"/> </xs:restriction> </xs:complexContent> </xs:complexType> <xs:complexType name="codePhaseQualityType"> <xs:complexContent> <xs:restriction base="xs:anyType"> <xs:attribute name="continuous" type="xs:boolean" default="true"/> <xs:attribute name="direct" use="required"> <xs:simpleType> <xs:restriction base="xs:token"> <xs:enumeration value="direct"/> <xs:enumeration value="inverted"/> </xs:restriction> </xs:simpleType> </xs:attribute> </xs:restriction> </xs:complexContent> </xs:complexType> <!-- DSL Measurements --> <xs:element name="dsl" type="lm:dslVlanType"/> <xs:complexType name="dslVlanType"> <xs:complexContent> <xs:restriction base="xs:anyType"> <xs:choice> <xs:element name="l2tp"> <xs:complexType> <xs:complexContent> <xs:restriction base="xs:anyType"> <xs:sequence> <xs:element name="src" type="lm:ipAddressType"/> <xs:element name="dest" type="lm:ipAddressType"/> <xs:element name="session" type="xs:nonNegativeInteger"/> </xs:sequence> </xs:restriction> </xs:complexContent> </xs:complexType> </xs:element> <xs:sequence> <xs:element name="an" type="xs:token"/> <xs:group ref="lm:dslSlotPort"/> </xs:sequence> <xs:sequence> <xs:element name="stag" type="lm:vlanIDType"/> <xs:choice> <xs:sequence> <xs:element name="ctag" type="lm:vlanIDType"/> <xs:group ref="lm:dslSlotPort" minOccurs="0"/> </xs:sequence> <xs:group ref="lm:dslSlotPort"/> </xs:choice> </xs:sequence> <xs:sequence> <xs:element name="vpi" type="lm:byteType"/> <xs:element name="vci" type="lm:twoByteType"/> </xs:sequence> <xs:any namespace="##other" processContents="lax" minOccurs="0" maxOccurs="unbounded"/> </xs:choice> <xs:anyAttribute namespace="##other" processContents="lax"/> </xs:restriction> </xs:complexContent> </xs:complexType> <xs:simpleType name="vlanIDType"> <xs:restriction base="xs:nonNegativeInteger"> <xs:maxInclusive value="4095"/> </xs:restriction> </xs:simpleType> <xs:group name="dslSlotPort"> <xs:sequence> <xs:element name="slot" type="xs:token"/> <xs:element name="port" type="xs:token"/> </xs:sequence> </xs:group> <!-- Common Data Types --> <xs:simpleType name="byteType"> <xs:restriction base="xs:integer"> <xs:minInclusive value="0"/> <xs:maxInclusive value="255"/> </xs:restriction> </xs:simpleType> <xs:simpleType name="twoByteType"> <xs:restriction base="xs:integer"> <xs:minInclusive value="0"/> <xs:maxInclusive value="65535"/> </xs:restriction> </xs:simpleType> <xs:simpleType name="nonNegativeDecimal"> <xs:restriction base="xs:decimal"> <xs:minInclusive value="0.0"/> </xs:restriction> </xs:simpleType> <xs:simpleType name="ipAddressType"> <xs:union memberTypes="lm:IPv6AddressType lm:IPv4AddressType"/> </xs:simpleType> <!-- IPv6 format definition --> <xs:simpleType name="IPv6AddressType"> <xs:annotation> <xs:documentation> An IP version 6 address, based on RFC 4291. </xs:documentation> </xs:annotation> <xs:restriction base="xs:token"> <!-- Fully specified address --> <xs:pattern value="[0-9A-Fa-f]{1,4}(:[0-9A-Fa-f]{1,4}){7}"/> <!-- Double colon start --> <xs:pattern value=":(:[0-9A-Fa-f]{1,4}){1,7}"/> <!-- Double colon middle --> <xs:pattern value="([0-9A-Fa-f]{1,4}:){1,6} (:[0-9A-Fa-f]{1,4}){1}"/> <xs:pattern value="([0-9A-Fa-f]{1,4}:){1,5} (:[0-9A-Fa-f]{1,4}){1,2}"/> <xs:pattern value="([0-9A-Fa-f]{1,4}:){1,4} (:[0-9A-Fa-f]{1,4}){1,3}"/> <xs:pattern value="([0-9A-Fa-f]{1,4}:){1,3} (:[0-9A-Fa-f]{1,4}){1,4}"/> <xs:pattern value="([0-9A-Fa-f]{1,4}:){1,2} (:[0-9A-Fa-f]{1,4}){1,5}"/> <xs:pattern value="([0-9A-Fa-f]{1,4}:){1} (:[0-9A-Fa-f]{1,4}){1,6}"/> <!-- Double colon end --> <xs:pattern value="([0-9A-Fa-f]{1,4}:){1,7}:"/> <!-- IPv4-Compatible and IPv4-Mapped Addresses --> <xs:pattern value="((:(:0{1,4}){0,3}:[fF]{4}) |(0{1,4}:(:0{1,4}){0,2}:[fF]{4}) |((0{1,4}:){2}(:0{1,4})?:[fF]{4}) |((0{1,4}:){3}:[fF]{4}) |((0{1,4}:){4}[fF]{4})) :(25[0-5]|2[0-4][0-9]|[0-1]?[0-9]?[0-9]) \.(25[0-5]|2[0-4][0-9]|[0-1]?[0-9]?[0-9]) \.(25[0-5]|2[0-4][0-9]|[0-1]?[0-9]?[0-9]) \.(25[0-5]|2[0-4][0-9]|[0-1]?[0-9]?[0-9])"/> <!-- The unspecified address --> <xs:pattern value="::"/> </xs:restriction> </xs:simpleType> <!-- IPv4 format definition --> <xs:simpleType name="IPv4AddressType"> <xs:restriction base="xs:token"> <xs:pattern value="(25[0-5]|2[0-4][0-9]|[0-1]?[0-9]?[0-9]) \.(25[0-5]|2[0-4][0-9]|[0-1]?[0-9]?[0-9]) \.(25[0-5]|2[0-4][0-9]|[0-1]?[0-9]?[0-9]) \.(25[0-5]|2[0-4][0-9]|[0-1]?[0-9]?[0-9])"/> </xs:restriction> </xs:simpleType> </xs:schema>
TOC |
Location measurements are provided by the Device for the sole purpose of generating more accurate location information. The LIS SHOULD NOT retain location measurements for any longer than is necessary to generate location information.
A LIS MUST NOT reveal location measurements to any other entity unless given explicit permission by the Device. This document does not include any means to indicate such permission.
TOC |
A Device is able to indicate a time in the location measurement using the expires attribute. Nominally, this attribute indicates how long information is expected to be valid for, but a Device MAY use this attribute to prevent the LIS from retaining measurement data.
The LIS MUST NOT keep location measurements beyond the time indicated in the expires attribute. Where the expires attribute is not provided, the LIS MUST discard location measurements immediately after servicing the current request.
TOC |
This section creates a registry for GNSS types (GNSS Measurements) and registers the schema from Section 5 (Measurement Schema).
TOC |
This document establishes a new IANA registry for Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) types. The registry includes tokens for the GNSS type and for each of the signals within that type. Referring to [RFC2434] (Narten, T. and H. Alvestrand, “Guidelines for Writing an IANA Considerations Section in RFCs,” October 1998.), this registry operates under both "Expert Review" and "Specification Required" rules. The IESG will appoint an Expert Reviewer who will advise IANA promptly on each request for a new or updated GNSS type.
Each entry in the registry requires the following information:
- GNSS name:
- the name and a brief description of the GNSS
- Brief description:
- the name and a brief description of the GNSS
- GNSS token:
- a token that can be used to identify the GNSS
- Signals:
- a set of tokens that represent each of the signals that the system provides
- Documentation reference:
- a reference to a stable, public specification that outlines usage of the GNSS, including (but not limited to) signal specifications and time systems; additionally assistance data formats and supporting protocols can be specified
The registry initially includes two registrations:
- GNSS name:
- Global Positioning System (GPS)
- Brief description:
- a system of satellites that use spread-spectrum transmission, operated by the US military for commercial and military applications
- GNSS token:
- gps
- Signals:
- L1, L2, L1C, L2C, L5
- Documentation reference:
- Navstar GPS Space Segment/Navigation User Interface (, “Navstar GPS Space Segment/Navigation User Interface,” Apr 2000.) [GPS.ICD]
- GNSS name:
- Galileo
- Brief description:
- a system of satellites that operate in the same spectrum as GPS, operated by the European Union for commercial applications
- GNSS Token:
- galileo
- Signals:
- L1, E5A, E5B, E5A+B, E6
- Documentation Reference:
- Galileo Open Service Signal In Space Interface Control Document (SIS ICD) (GJU, “Galileo Open Service Signal In Space Interface Control Document (SIS ICD),” May 2006.) [Galileo.ICD]
TOC |
This section registers a new XML namespace, urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:held:lm, as per the guidelines in [RFC3688] (Mealling, M., “The IETF XML Registry,” January 2004.).
URI: urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:held:lm
Registrant Contact: IETF, GEOPRIV working group, (geopriv@ietf.org), Martin Thomson (martin.thomson@andrew.com).
XML:
BEGIN <?xml version="1.0"?> <!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Strict//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-strict.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xml:lang="en"> <head> <title>HELD Measurements</title> </head> <body> <h1>Namespace for HELD Measurements</h1> <h2>urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:held:lm</h2> [[NOTE TO IANA/RFC-EDITOR: Please update RFC URL and replace XXXX with the RFC number for this specification.]] <p>See <a href="[[RFC URL]]">RFCXXXX</a>.</p> </body> </html> END
TOC |
This section registers an XML schema as per the guidelines in [RFC3688] (Mealling, M., “The IETF XML Registry,” January 2004.).
- URI:
- urn:ietf:params:xml:schema:held:lm
- Registrant Contact:
- IETF, GEOPRIV working group, (geopriv@ietf.org), Martin Thomson (martin.thomson@andrew.com).
- Schema:
- The XML for this schema can be found in Section 5 (Measurement Schema) of this document.
TOC |
This section registers a new XML namespace, urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:ip, as per the guidelines in [RFC3688] (Mealling, M., “The IETF XML Registry,” January 2004.).
URI: urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:ip
Registrant Contact: IETF, GEOPRIV working group, (geopriv@ietf.org), Martin Thomson (martin.thomson@andrew.com).
XML:
BEGIN <?xml version="1.0"?> <!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Strict//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-strict.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xml:lang="en"> <head> <title>IP Address Types</title> </head> <body> <h1>Namespace for IP Address Types</h1> <h2>urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:ip</h2> [[NOTE TO IANA/RFC-EDITOR: Please update RFC URL and replace XXXX with the RFC number for this specification.]] <p>See <a href="[[RFC URL]]">RFCXXXX</a>.</p> </body> </html> END
TOC |
This section registers an XML schema as per the guidelines in [RFC3688] (Mealling, M., “The IETF XML Registry,” January 2004.).
- URI:
- urn:ietf:params:xml:schema:ip
- Registrant Contact:
- IETF, GEOPRIV working group, (geopriv@ietf.org), Martin Thomson (martin.thomson@andrew.com).
- Schema:
- The XML for this schema can be found in Section 5 (Measurement Schema) of this document.
TOC |
TOC |
[RFC2119] | Bradner, S., “Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate Requirement Levels,” BCP 14, RFC 2119, March 1997 (TXT, HTML, XML). |
[RFC2434] | Narten, T. and H. Alvestrand, “Guidelines for Writing an IANA Considerations Section in RFCs,” BCP 26, RFC 2434, October 1998 (TXT, HTML, XML). |
[I-D.ietf-geopriv-http-location-delivery] | Barnes, M., Winterbottom, J., Thomson, M., and B. Stark, “HTTP Enabled Location Delivery (HELD),” draft-ietf-geopriv-http-location-delivery-16 (work in progress), August 2009 (TXT). |
TOC |
[RFC3693] | Cuellar, J., Morris, J., Mulligan, D., Peterson, J., and J. Polk, “Geopriv Requirements,” RFC 3693, February 2004 (TXT). |
[RFC3046] | Patrick, M., “DHCP Relay Agent Information Option,” RFC 3046, January 2001 (TXT). |
[RFC4649] | Volz, B., “Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol for IPv6 (DHCPv6) Relay Agent Remote-ID Option,” RFC 4649, August 2006 (TXT). |
[IANA.enterprise] | IANA, “Private Enterprise Numbers.” |
[RFC3993] | Johnson, R., Palaniappan, T., and M. Stapp, “Subscriber-ID Suboption for the Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol (DHCP) Relay Agent Option,” RFC 3993, March 2005 (TXT). |
[RFC4580] | Volz, B., “Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol for IPv6 (DHCPv6) Relay Agent Subscriber-ID Option,” RFC 4580, June 2006 (TXT). |
[RFC3688] | Mealling, M., “The IETF XML Registry,” BCP 81, RFC 3688, January 2004 (TXT). |
[IEEE.8021AB] | IEEE, “IEEE Standard for Local and Metropolitan area networks, Station and Media Access Control Connectivity Discovery,” 802.1AB, June 2005. |
[GPS.ICD] | “Navstar GPS Space Segment/Navigation User Interface,” ICD GPS-200, Apr 2000. |
[Galileo.ICD] | GJU, “Galileo Open Service Signal In Space Interface Control Document (SIS ICD),” May 2006. |
[I-D.winterbottom-geopriv-lis2lis-req] | Winterbottom, J. and S. Norreys, “LIS to LIS Protocol Requirements,” draft-winterbottom-geopriv-lis2lis-req-01 (work in progress), November 2007 (TXT). |
[DSL.TR025] | Wang, R., “Core Network Architecture Recommendations for Access to Legacy Data Networks over ADSL,” September 1999. |
[DSL.TR101] | Cohen, A. and E. Shrum, “Migration to Ethernet-Based DSl Aggregation,” April 2006. |
[RFC2865] | Rigney, C., Willens, S., Rubens, A., and W. Simpson, “Remote Authentication Dial In User Service (RADIUS),” RFC 2865, June 2000 (TXT). |
TOC |
Martin Thomson | |
Andrew | |
PO Box U40 | |
Wollongong University Campus, NSW 2500 | |
AU | |
Phone: | +61 2 4221 2915 |
Email: | martin.thomson@andrew.com |
URI: | http://www.andrew.com/ |
James Winterbottom | |
Andrew | |
PO Box U40 | |
Wollongong University Campus, NSW 2500 | |
AU | |
Phone: | +61 2 4221 2938 |
Email: | james.winterbottom@andrew.com |
URI: | http://www.andrew.com/ |
TOC |
Copyright © The IETF Trust (2007).
This document is subject to the rights, licenses and restrictions contained in BCP 78, and except as set forth therein, the authors retain all their rights.
This document and the information contained herein are provided on an “AS IS” basis and THE CONTRIBUTOR, THE ORGANIZATION HE/SHE REPRESENTS OR IS SPONSORED BY (IF ANY), THE INTERNET SOCIETY, THE IETF TRUST AND THE INTERNET ENGINEERING TASK FORCE DISCLAIM ALL WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO ANY WARRANTY THAT THE USE OF THE INFORMATION HEREIN WILL NOT INFRINGE ANY RIGHTS OR ANY IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.
The IETF takes no position regarding the validity or scope of any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights that might be claimed to pertain to the implementation or use of the technology described in this document or the extent to which any license under such rights might or might not be available; nor does it represent that it has made any independent effort to identify any such rights. Information on the procedures with respect to rights in RFC documents can be found in BCP 78 and BCP 79.
Copies of IPR disclosures made to the IETF Secretariat and any assurances of licenses to be made available, or the result of an attempt made to obtain a general license or permission for the use of such proprietary rights by implementers or users of this specification can be obtained from the IETF on-line IPR repository at http://www.ietf.org/ipr.
The IETF invites any interested party to bring to its attention any copyrights, patents or patent applications, or other proprietary rights that may cover technology that may be required to implement this standard. Please address the information to the IETF at ietf-ipr@ietf.org.