TOC |
|
By submitting this Internet-Draft, each author represents that any applicable patent or other IPR claims of which he or she is aware have been or will be disclosed, and any of which he or she becomes aware will be disclosed, in accordance with Section 6 of BCP 79.
Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF), its areas, and its working groups. Note that other groups may also distribute working documents as Internet-Drafts.
Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference material or to cite them other than as “work in progress.”
The list of current Internet-Drafts can be accessed at http://www.ietf.org/ietf/1id-abstracts.txt.
The list of Internet-Draft Shadow Directories can be accessed at http://www.ietf.org/shadow.html.
This Internet-Draft will expire on May 2, 2009.
A method is described by which a Device is able to provide location-related measurement data to a LIS within a request for location information. Location-related measurement information are observations concerning properties related to the position of a Device, which could be data about network attachment or about the physical environment. When a LIS generates location information for a Device, information from the Device can improve the accuracy of the location estimate. A basic set of location-related measurements are defined, including common modes of network attachment as well as assisted Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) parameters.
1.
Introduction
2.
Conventions used in this document
3.
Location-Related Measurements in LCPs
3.1.
Using Location-Releated Measurement Data
4.
Location-Related Measurement Data Types
4.1.
Common Location-Related Measurement Fields
4.1.1.
Time of Measurement
4.1.2.
Expiry Time on Location-Related Measurement Data
4.1.3.
RMS Error and Number of Samples
4.1.4.
Time RMS Error
4.2.
LLDP Measurements
4.3.
DHCP Relay Agent Information Measurements
4.4.
802.11 WLAN Measurements
4.5.
Cellular Measurements
4.6.
GNSS Measurements
4.6.1.
GNSS System and Signal
4.6.2.
Time
4.6.3.
Per-Satellite Measurement Data
4.7.
DSL Measurements
4.7.1.
L2TP Measurements
4.7.2.
RADIUS Measurements
4.7.3.
Ethernet VLAN Tag Measurements
4.7.4.
ATM Virtual Circuit Measurements
5.
Measurement Schemas
5.1.
Measurement Container Schema
5.2.
Base Type Schema
5.3.
LLDP Measurement Schema
5.4.
DHCP Measurement Schema
5.5.
WiFi Measurement Schema
5.6.
Cellular Measurement Schema
5.7.
GNSS Measurement Schema
5.8.
DSL Measurement Schema
6.
Security Considerations
7.
IANA Considerations
7.1.
IANA Registry for GNSS Types
7.2.
URN Sub-Namespace Registration for urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:geopriv:lm
7.3.
URN Sub-Namespace Registration for urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:geopriv:lm:basetypes
7.4.
URN Sub-Namespace Registration for urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:geopriv:lm:lldp
7.5.
URN Sub-Namespace Registration for urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:geopriv:lm:dhcp
7.6.
URN Sub-Namespace Registration for urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:geopriv:lm:wifi
7.7.
URN Sub-Namespace Registration for urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:geopriv:lm:cell
7.8.
URN Sub-Namespace Registration for urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:geopriv:lm:gnss
7.9.
URN Sub-Namespace Registration for urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:geopriv:lm:dsl
7.10.
XML Schema Registration for Measurement Container Schema
7.11.
XML Schema Registration for Base Types Schema
7.12.
XML Schema Registration for LLDP Schema
7.13.
XML Schema Registration for DHCP Schema
7.14.
XML Schema Registration for WiFi Schema
7.15.
XML Schema Registration for Cellular Schema
7.16.
XML Schema Registration for GNSS Schema
7.17.
XML Schema Registration for DSL Schema
8.
Acknowledgements
9.
References
9.1.
Normative References
9.2.
Informative References
§
Authors' Addresses
§
Intellectual Property and Copyright Statements
TOC |
A location configuration protocol (LCP) provides a means for a Device to request information about its physical location from an access network. A location information server (LIS) is the server that provides location information; information that is available due to the knowledge about the network and physical environment that is available to the LIS.
As a part of the access network, the LIS is able to acquire measurement results from network Devices within the network that are related to Device location. The LIS also has access to information about the network topology that can be used to turn measurement data into location information. However, this information can be enhanced with information acquired from the Device itself.
A Device is able to make observations about its network attachment, or its physical environment. The location-related measurement data might be unavailable to the LIS; alternatively, the LIS might be able to acquire the data, but at a higher cost in time or otherwise. Providing measurement data gives the LIS more options in determining location, which could improve the quality of the service provided by the LIS. Improvements in accuracy are one potential gain, but improved response times and lower error rates are also possible.
This document describes a means for a Device to report location-related measurement data to the LIS. Examples based on the HELD (Barnes, M., Winterbottom, J., Thomson, M., and B. Stark, “HTTP Enabled Location Delivery (HELD),” August 2009.) [I‑D.ietf‑geopriv‑http‑location‑delivery] location configuration protocol are provided.
TOC |
The terms LIS and Device are used in this document in a manner consistent with the usage in [I‑D.ietf‑geopriv‑http‑location‑delivery] (Barnes, M., Winterbottom, J., Thomson, M., and B. Stark, “HTTP Enabled Location Delivery (HELD),” August 2009.).
This document also uses the following definitions:
- Location Measurement:
- An observation about the physical properties of a particular Device's network access. The result of a location measurement—"location-related measurement data", or simply "measurement data" given sufficient context—can be used to determine the location of a Device. Location-related measurement data does not identify a Device; measurement data can change with time if the location of the Device also changes.
Location-related measurement data does not necessarily contain location information directly, but it can be used in combination with contextual knowledge of the network, or algorithms to derive location information. Examples of location-related measurement data are: radio signal strength or timing measurements, Ethernet switch and port identifiers.
Location-related measurement data can be considered sighting information, based on the definition in [RFC3693] (Cuellar, J., Morris, J., Mulligan, D., Peterson, J., and J. Polk, “Geopriv Requirements,” February 2004.).- Location Estimate:
- The result of location determination, a location estimate is an approximation of where the Device is located. Location estimates are subject to uncertainty, which arise from errors in measurement results.
- GNSS:
- Global Navigation Satellite System. A satellite-based system that provides positioning and time information. For example, the US Global Positioning System (GPS) or the European Galileo system.
The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT", "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described in [RFC2119] (Bradner, S., “Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate Requirement Levels,” March 1997.).
TOC |
This document defines a standard container for the conveyance of location-related measurement parameters in LCPs. This is an XML container that identifies parameters by type and allows the Device to provide the results of any measurement it is able to perform. A set of measurement schemas are also defined that can be carried in the generic container.
The simplest example of measurement data conveyance is illustrated by the example message in Figure 1 (HELD Location Request with Measurement Data). This shows a HELD location request message with an Ethernet switch and port measurement taken using LLDP (IEEE, “IEEE Standard for Local and Metropolitan area networks, Station and Media Access Control Connectivity Discovery,” June 2005.) [IEEE.8021AB].
<locationRequest xmlns="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:geopriv:held"> <locationType exact="true">civic</locationType> <measurements xmlns="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:geopriv:lm" time="2008-04-29T14:33:58"> <lldp xmlns="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:geopriv:lm:lldp"> <chassis type="4">0a01003c</chassis> <port type="6">c2</port> </lldp> </measurements> </locationRequest>
Figure 1: HELD Location Request with Measurement Data |
Location-related measurement data need not be provided exclusively by Devices. Intermediaries involved in cooperative location determination, such as a the second LIS in [I‑D.winterbottom‑geopriv‑lis2lis‑req] (Winterbottom, J. and S. Norreys, “LIS to LIS Protocol Requirements,” November 2007.), might provide a LIS with measurement data.
Measurement data that the LIS does not support or understand can be ignored. The measurements defined in this document follow this rule; extensions that could result in backward incompatibility MUST be added as new measurement definitions rather than extensions to existing types.
Multiple sets of measurement data, either of the same type or from different sources can be included in the measurements element. See Section 4.1.1 (Time of Measurement) for details on repetition of this element.
TOC |
Using location-related measurement data is at the discretion of the LIS, but the method parameter in the PIDF-LO SHOULD be adjusted to reflect the method used.
Location-related measurement data provides an attack vector for malicious Devices. If it is in the interest of the Device to induce the LIS to provide false information about its location, measurement data can be indirectly used to influence the result that the LIS provides. This is particularly important where the LIS provides certitude on the location information, either through digital signature or simply by serving a location reference.
To prevent the propagation of indirectly falsified location information, the LIS SHOULD validate location-related measurements. The amount of verification might depend on the expected use of that data. Any measurement data that is determined to be suspect is discarded.
In one potential solution, the LIS validates any location information that is derived from Device-provided measurement data. The resulting location information is compared against location information that the LIS is able to generate independently. If the two results differ significantly, the measurement data is regarded as suspect and the results derived from that are discarded. The allowable degree of difference is left to local configuration or implementation.
Different degrees of trust can be assigned to location-related measurement data based on the source of the data. Unauthenticated Devices might be subjected to rigorous checking before being accepted, if the data is accepted at all. Conversely, measurement data from trusted intermediaries might not be validated at all.
Given that the output of location determination is probabilistic, it could be that accepting a finite probability of falsified measurement data is acceptable. A decision on how much risk is accepted is left to local policy.
If absolute certitude of the resulting location information is required, then the LIS MUST NOT use unverified information. In this case, Device-provided measurement data is only of benefit if verification of that data is more efficient than collection.
TOC |
This document defines location-related measurement data types for a range of common network types.
TOC |
This section describes metadata that is common to a wide range of measurement data. Time of measurement and expiry time apply to all measurements; RMS error and number of samples apply to selected measurement types.
TOC |
The time attribute records the time that the measurement or observation was made. This time can be different to the time that the measurement information was reported. Time information can be used to populate a timestamp on the location result, or to determine if the measurement information is used.
The time attribute is optional to avoid forcing an arbitrary choice of timestamp for relatively static types of measurement (for instance, the DSL measurements in Section 4.7 (DSL Measurements)) and for legacy Devices that don't record time information (such as the Home Location Register/Home Subscriber Server for cellular). However, time SHOULD be provided whenever possible.
The time attribute is attached to the root measurement element. If it is necessary to provide multiple sets of measurement data with different times, multiple measurement elements SHOULD be provided.
TOC |
A Device is able to indicate an expiry time in the location measurement using the expires attribute. Nominally, this attribute indicates how long information is expected to be valid for, but it can also indicate a time limit on the retention and use of the measurement data. A Device can use this attribute to prevent the LIS from retaining measurement data or limit the time that a LIS retains this information.
- Note:
- Movement of a Device might result in the measurement data being invalidated before the expiry time.
The LIS MUST NOT keep location-related measurement data beyond the time indicated in the expires attribute. Where the expires attribute is not provided, the LIS MUST only use the location-related measurement data in serving the request that contained the data.
Figure 2 (Expiry Time Example) shows an example of a measurement that includes an expiry attribute.
<lm:measurements xmlns:lm="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:geopriv:lm" time="2008-04-29T14:33:58" expires="2008-04-29T17:33:58"> <wifi xmlns="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:geopriv:lm:wifi"> <servingWap> <ssid>wlan-home</ssid> <bssid>00-12-F0-A0-80-EF</bssid> </servingWap> </wifi> </lm:measurements>
Figure 2: Expiry Time Example |
TOC |
Often a measurement is taken more than once over a period of time. Reporting the average of a number of measurement results mitigates the effects of random errors that occur in the measurement process. Typically, a mean value is reported at the end of the measurement interval, but additional information about the distribution of the results can be useful in determining location uncertainty.
Two optional attributes are provided for certain measurement values:
- rmsError:
- The root-mean-squared (RMS) error of the set of measurement values used in calculating the result. RMS error is expressed in the same units as the measurement, unless otherwise stated. If an accurate value for RMS error is not known, this value can be used to indicate an upper bound for the RMS error.
- samples:
- The number of samples that were taken in determining the measurement value. If omitted, this value can be assumed to be a very large value, so that the RMS error is an indication of the standard deviation of the sample set.
For some measurement techniques, measurement error is determined for the specific measurement technique. In these cases, measurement error is largely a product of the measurement technique and not the specific circumstances, so RMS error does not need to be actively measured. A fixed value MAY be provided for RMS error where appropriate.
TOC |
Measurement of time can be significant in certain circumstances. The GNSS measurements included in this document are one such case where a small error in time can result in a large error in location. Factors such as clock drift and errors in time sychronization can result in small, but significant, time errors. Including an indication of the quality of the time can be helpful.
An optional timeError attribute can be added to the measurement element to indicate the RMS error in time. timeError indicates an upper bound on the time RMS error in seconds.
The timeError attribute does not apply where multiple samples of a measurement is taken over time. If multiple samples are taken, each SHOULD be included in a different measurement element.
TOC |
LLDP messages are sent between adjacent nodes in an IEEE 802 network (e.g. wired Ethernet, WiFi, 802.16). These messages all contain identification information for the sending node, which can be used to determine location information. A Device that receives LLDP messages can report this information as a location-related measurement to the LIS, which is then able to use the measurement data in determining the location of the Device.
The Device MUST report the values directly as they were provided by the adjacent node. Attempting to adjust or translate the type of identifier is likely to cause the measurement data to be useless.
Where a Device has received LLDP messages from multiple adjacent nodes, it should provide information extracted from those messages by repeating the lldp element.
An example of an LLDP measurement is shown in Figure 3 (LLDP Measurement Example). This shows an adjacent node (chassis) that is identified by the IP address 192.0.2.45 (hexadecimal c000022d) and the port on that node is numbered using an agent circuit ID (Patrick, M., “DHCP Relay Agent Information Option,” January 2001.) [RFC3046] of 162 (hexadecimal a2).
<measurements xmlns="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:geopriv:lm" time="2008-04-29T14:33:58"> <lldp xmlns="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:geopriv:lm:lldp"> <chassis type="4">c000022d</chassis> <port type="6">a2</port> </lldp> </measurements>
Figure 3: LLDP Measurement Example |
IEEE 802 Devices that are able to obtain information about adjacent network switches and their attachment to them by other means MAY use this data type to convey this information.
TOC |
The DHCP Relay Agent Information option (Patrick, M., “DHCP Relay Agent Information Option,” January 2001.) [RFC3046] provides measurement data about the network attachment of a Device. This measurement data can be included in the dhcp-rai element.
The elements in the DHCP relay agent information options are opaque data types assigned by the DHCP relay agent. The three items are all optional: circuit identifier (circuit, [RFC3046] (Patrick, M., “DHCP Relay Agent Information Option,” January 2001.)), remote identifier (remote, [RFC3046] (Patrick, M., “DHCP Relay Agent Information Option,” January 2001.), [RFC4649] (Volz, B., “Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol for IPv6 (DHCPv6) Relay Agent Remote-ID Option,” August 2006.)) and subscriber identifier (subscriber, [RFC3993] (Johnson, R., Palaniappan, T., and M. Stapp, “Subscriber-ID Suboption for the Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol (DHCP) Relay Agent Option,” March 2005.), [RFC4580] (Volz, B., “Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol for IPv6 (DHCPv6) Relay Agent Subscriber-ID Option,” June 2006.)). The DHCPv6 remote identifier has an associated enterprise number (IANA, “Private Enterprise Numbers,” .) [IANA.enterprise] as an XML attribute.
<measurements xmlns="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:geopriv:lm" time="2008-04-29T14:33:58"> <dhcp-rai xmlns="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:geopriv:lm:dhcp"> <giaddr>::ffff:192.0.2.158</giaddr> <circuit>108b</circuit> </dhcp-rai> </measurements>
Figure 4: DHCP Relay Agent Information Measurement Example |
The giaddr is specified as a dotted quad IPv4 address or an RFC 4291 (Hinden, R. and S. Deering, “IP Version 6 Addressing Architecture,” February 2006.) [RFC4291] IPv6 address. The enterprise number is specified as a decimal integer. All other information is included verbatim from the DHCP request in hexadecimal format.
TOC |
In WiFi, or 802.11, networks a Device might be able to provide information about the wireless access point (WAP) that it is attached to, or other WiFi points it is able to see. This is provided using the wifi element, as shown in Figure 5 (802.11 WLAN Measurement Example).
<measurements xmlns="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:geopriv:lm" time="2008-04-29T14:33:58"> <wifi xmlns="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:geopriv:lm:wifi"> <nicType>Intel(r)PRO/Wireless 2200BG</nicType> <servingWap> <ssid>wlan-home</ssid> <bssid>00-12-F0-A0-80-EF</bssid> <rssi dBm="false">95</rssi> </servingWap> <neighbourWap> <ssid>wlan-home</ssid> <bssid>00-12-F0-A0-80-F0</bssid> <rssi dBm="false">15</rssi> </neighbourWap> <neighbourWap> <ssid>wlan-home</ssid> <bssid>00-12-F0-A0-80-F1</bssid> <rssi dBm="false">12</rssi> </neighbourWap> <neighbourWap> <ssid>wlan-home</ssid> <bssid>00-12-F0-A0-80-F2</bssid> <rssi dBm="false">5</rssi> </neighbourWap> </wifi> </measurements>
Figure 5: 802.11 WLAN Measurement Example |
A wifi element is made up of a serving WAP, zero or more neighbouring WAPs, and an optional nicType element. Each WAP element is comprised of the following fields:
- ssid:
- The service set identifier for the wireless network. This parameter must be provided.
- bssid:
- The basic service set identifier. This is the 48 bit Ethernet MAC address of the wireless access point and it must be provided.
- wapname:
- The broadcast name for the wireless access point. This element is optional.
- rssi:
- The received signal strength indicator of the WAP as seen by the wireless receiver. This value SHOULD be in units of dBm (with RMS error in dB). If the units are unknown, the dBm attribute MUST be set to false. Signal strength reporting on current hardware uses a range of different units; therefore, the value of the nicType element SHOULD be included if the units are not known to be in dBm and the value reported by the hardware should be included without modification. This element is optional and includes optional rmsError and samples attributes.
The nicType element is used to specify the make and model of the wireless network interface in the Device. Different 802.11 chipsets report the signal strength in different ways, so the nic type must be specified in order for the LIS to use signal strength indicators as part of its location determination process. The content of this field is unconstrained and no mechanisms are specified to ensure uniqueness.
TOC |
Cellular Devices are common throughout the world and base station identifiers can provide a good source of coarse location information. This information can be provided to a LIS run by the cellar operator, or may be provided to an alternative LIS operator that has access to one of several global cell-id to location mapping databases.
The cellular measurement set allows a Device to report to a LIS any LTE (Figure 6 (Example LTE Cellular Measurement)), UMTS (Figure 7 (Example UMTS Cellular Measurement)), GSM (Figure 8 (Example GSM Cellular Measurement)) or CDMA (Figure 9 (Example CDMA Cellular Measurement)) cells that it is able to hear. Cells are reported using their global identifiers. All 3GPP cells are identified by public land mobile network (PLMN), which is formed of mobile country code (MCC) and mobile network code (MNC); specific fields are added for each network type. All other values are decimal integers.
<measurements xmlns="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:geopriv:lm" time="2008-04-29T14:33:58"> <cellular xmlns="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:geopriv:lm:cell"> <servingCell> <mcc>465</mcc><mnc>20</mnc> <csg>1234</csg><lcid>65000</lcid> </servingCell> <observedCell> <mcc>465</mcc><mnc>06</mnc> <gid>16383</gid><cbid>32767</cbid> </observedCell> </cellular> </measurements>
Long term evolution (LTE) cells are identified by group id (gid) and cell broadcast id (cbid), or by closed subscription group (csg) and local cell id (lcid).
Figure 6: Example LTE Cellular Measurement |
<measurements xmlns="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:geopriv:lm" time="2008-04-29T14:33:58"> <cellular xmlns="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:geopriv:lm:cell"> <servingCell> <mcc>465</mcc><mnc>20</mnc> <rnc>2000</rnc><cid>65000</cid> </servingCell> <observedCell> <mcc>465</mcc><mnc>06</mnc> <lac>16383</lac><cid>32767</cid> </observedCell> </cellular> </measurements>
Universal mobile telephony service (UMTS) cells are identified by radio network controller (rnc) and cell id (cid).
Figure 7: Example UMTS Cellular Measurement |
<measurements xmlns="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:geopriv:lm" time="2008-04-29T14:33:58"> <cellular xmlns="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:geopriv:lm:cell"> <servingCell> <mcc>465</mcc><mnc>06</mnc> <lac>16383</lac><cid>32767</cid> </servingCell> </cellular> </measurements>
Groupe Spe'ciale Mobile (GSM) cells are identified by local radio network controller (rnc) and cell id (cid).
Figure 8: Example GSM Cellular Measurement |
<measurements xmlns="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:geopriv:lm" time="2008-04-29T14:33:58"> <cellular xmlns="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:geopriv:lm:cell"> <servingCell> <nid>4723</nid><sid>15892</sid><baseid>12</baseid> </servingCell> <observedCell> <nid>4723</nid><sid>15892</sid><baseid>13</baseid> </observedCell> </cellular> </measurements>
Code division multiple access (CDMA) cells are not identified by PLMN, network id (nid), system id (sid) and base station id (baseid).
Figure 9: Example CDMA Cellular Measurement |
In general a cellular Device will be attached to the cellular network and so the notion of a serving cell exists. Cellular network also provide overlap between neighbouring sites, so a mobile Device can hear more than one cell. The measurement schema supports sending both the serving cell and any other cells that the mobile might be able to hear. In some cases, the Device may simply be listening to cell information without actually attaching to the network, mobiles without a SIM are an example of this. In this case the Device may simply report cells it can hear without flagging one as a serving cell. An example of this is shown in Figure 10 (Example Observed Cellular Measurement).
<measurements xmlns="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:geopriv:lm" time="2008-04-29T14:33:58"> <cellular xmlns="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:geopriv:lm:cell"> <observedCell> <mcc>465</mcc><mnc>20</mnc> <rnc>2000</rnc><cid>65000</cid> </observedCell> <observedCell> <mcc>465</mcc><mnc>06</mnc> <lac>16383</lac><cid>32767</cid> </observedCell> </cellular> </measurements>
Figure 10: Example Observed Cellular Measurement |
TOC |
GNSS use orbiting satellites to transmit signals. A Device with a GNSS receiver is able to take measurements from the satellite signals. The results of these measurements can be used to determine time and the location of the Device.
Determining location and time in autonomous GNSS receivers follows three steps:
- Signal acquisition:
- During the signal acquisition stage, the receiver searches for the repeating code that is sent by each GNSS satellite. Successful operation typically requires measurement data for a minimum of 5 satellites. At this stage, measurement data is available to the Device.
- Navigation message decode:
- Once the signal has been acquired, the receiver then receives information about the configuration of the satellite constellation. This information is broadcast by each satellite and is modulated with the base signal at a low rate; for instance, GPS sends this information at about 50 bits per second.
- Calculation:
- The measurement data is combined with the data on the satellite constellation to determine the location of the receiver and the current time.
A Device that uses a GNSS receiver is able to report measurements after the first stage of this process. A LIS can use the results of these measurements to determine a location. In the case where there are fewer results available than the optimal minimum, the LIS might be able to use other sources of measurement information and combine these with the available measurement data to determine a position.
Note: The use of different sets of GNSS assistance data can reduce the amount of time required for the signal acquisition stage and obviate the need for the receiver to extract data on the satellite constellation. Provision of assistance data is outside the scope of this document.
Figure 11 (Example GNSS Measurement) shows an example of GNSS measurement data. The measurement shown is for the GPS system and includes measurement data for three satellites only.
<measurements xmlns="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:geopriv:lm" time="2008-04-29T14:33:58" timeError="2e-5"> <gnss xmlns="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:geopriv:lm:gnss" system="gps" signal="L1"> <sat num="19"> <doppler>499.9395</doppler> <codephase rmsError="1.6e-9">0.87595747</codephase> <cn0>45</cn0> </sat> <sat num="27"> <doppler>378.2657</doppler> <codephase rmsError="1.6e-9">0.56639479</codephase> <cn0>52</cn0> </sat> <sat num="20"> <doppler>-633.0309</doppler> <codephase rmsError="1.6e-9">0.57016835</codephase> <cn0>48</cn0> </sat> </gnss> </measurements>
Figure 11: Example GNSS Measurement |
Each gnss element represents a single set of GNSS measurement data, taken at a single point in time. Measurements taken at different times can be included in different gnss elements to enable iterative refinement of results.
GNSS measurement parameters are described in more detail in the following sections.
TOC |
The GNSS measurement structure is designed to be generic and to apply to different GNSS types. Different signals within those systems are also accounted for and can be measured separately.
The GNSS type determines the time system that is used. An indication of the type of system and signal can ensure that the LIS is able to correctly use measurements.
Measurements for multiple GNSS types and signals can be included by repeating the gnss element.
This document creates an IANA registry for GNSS types. Two satellite systems are registered by this document: GPS and Galileo. Details for the registry are included in Section 7.1 (IANA Registry for GNSS Types).
TOC |
Each set of GNSS measurements is taken at a specific point in time. The time attribute is used to indicate the time that the measurement was acquired, if the receiver knows how the time system used by the GNSS relates to UTC time.
Alternative to (or in addition to) the measurement time, the gnssTime element MAY be included. The gnssTime element includes a relative time in milliseconds using the time system native to the satellite system. For the GPS satellite system, the gnssTime element includes the time of week in milliseconds. For the Galileo system, the gnssTime element includes the time of day in milliseconds.
The accuracy of the time measurement provided is critical in determining the accuracy of the location information derived from GNSS measurements. The receiver SHOULD indicate an estimated time error for any time that is provided. An RMS error can be included for the gnssTime element, with a value in milliseconds.
TOC |
Multiple satellites are included in each set of GNSS measurements using the sat element. Each satellite is identified by a number in the num attribute. The satellite number is consistent with the identifier used in the given GNSS.
Both the GPS and Galileo systems use satellite numbers between 1 and 64.
The GNSS receiver measures the following parameters for each satellite:
- doppler:
- The observed Doppler shift of the satellite signal, measured in metres per second. This is converted from a value in Hertz.
- codephase:
- The observed code phase for the satellite signal, measured in milliseconds. This is converted from a value in chips or wavelengths. Increasing values indicate increasing pseudoranges. This value includes an optional RMS error attribute, also measured in milliseconds.
- cn0:
- The signal to noise ratio for the satellite signal, measured in decibel-Hertz (dB-Hz). The expected range is between 20 and 50 dB-Hz.
- mp:
- An estimation of the amount of error that multipath signals contribute in metres. This parameter is optional.
- cq:
- An indication of the carrier quality. Two attributes are included: continuous may be either true or false; direct may be either direct or inverted. This parameter is optional.
- adr:
- The accumulated Doppler range, measured in metres. This parameter is optional and is not necessary unless multiple sets of GNSS measurements are provided.
All values are converted from measures native to the satellite system to generic measures to ensure consistency of interpretation. Unless necessary, the schema does not constrain these values.
TOC |
Digital Subscriber Line (DSL) networks rely on a range of network technology. DSL deployments regularly require cooperation between multiple organizations. These fall into two broad categories: infrastructure providers and Internet service providers (ISPs). Infrastructure providers manage the bulk of the physical infrastructure including cabling. End users obtain their service from an ISP, which manages all aspects visible to the end user including IP address allocation and operation of a LIS. See [DSL.TR025] (Wang, R., “Core Network Architecture Recommendations for Access to Legacy Data Networks over ADSL,” September 1999.) and [DSL.TR101] (Cohen, A. and E. Shrum, “Migration to Ethernet-Based DSl Aggregation,” April 2006.) for further information on DSL network deployments.
Exchange of measurement information between these organizations is necessary for location information to be correctly generated. The ISP LIS needs to acquire location information from the infrastructure provider. However, the infrastructure provider has no knowledge of Device identifiers, it can only identify a stream of data that is sent to the ISP. This is resolved by passing measurement data relating to the Device to a LIS operated by the infrastructure provider.
TOC |
Layer 2 Tunneling Protocol (L2TP) is a common means of linking the infrastructure provider and the ISP. The infrastructure provider LIS requires measurement data that identifies a single L2TP tunnel, from which it can generate location information. Figure 12 (Example DSL L2TP Measurement) shows an example L2TP measurement.
<measurements xmlns="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:geopriv:lm" time="2008-04-29T14:33:58"> <dsl xmlns="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:geopriv:lm:dsl"> <l2tp> <src>192.0.2.10</src> <dest>192.0.2.61</dest> <session>528</session> </l2tp> </dsl> </measurements>
Figure 12: Example DSL L2TP Measurement |
TOC |
When authenticating network access, the infrastructure provider might employ a RADIUS (Rigney, C., Willens, S., Rubens, A., and W. Simpson, “Remote Authentication Dial In User Service (RADIUS),” June 2000.) [RFC2865] proxy at the DSL Access Module (DSLAM) or Access Node (AN). These messages provide the ISP RADIUS server with an identifier for the DSLAM or AN, plus the slot and port that the Device is attached on. These data can be provided as a measurement, which allows the infrastructure provider LIS to generate location information.
The format of the AN, slot and port identifiers are not defined in the RADIUS protocol. Slot and port together identify a circuit on the AN, analogous to the circuit identifier in [RFC3046] (Patrick, M., “DHCP Relay Agent Information Option,” January 2001.). These items are provided directly, as they were in the RADIUS message. An example is shown in Figure 13 (Example DSL RADIUS Measurement).
<measurements xmlns="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:geopriv:lm" time="2008-04-29T14:33:58"> <dsl xmlns="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:geopriv:lm:dsl"> <an>AN-7692</an> <slot>3</slot> <port>06</port> </dsl> </measurements>
Figure 13: Example DSL RADIUS Measurement |
TOC |
For Ethernet-based DSL access networks, the DSL Access Module (DSLAM) or Access Node (AN) provide two VLAN tags on packets. A C-TAG is used to identify the incoming residential circuit, while the S-TAG is used to identify the DSLAM or AN. The C-TAG and S-TAG together can be used to identify a single point of network attachment. An example is shown in Figure 14 (Example DSL VLAN Tag Measurement).
<measurements xmlns="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:geopriv:lm" time="2008-04-29T14:33:58"> <dsl xmlns="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:geopriv:lm:dsl"> <stag>613</stag> <ctag>1097</ctag> </dsl> </measurements>
Figure 14: Example DSL VLAN Tag Measurement |
Alternatively, the C-TAG can be replaced by data on the slot and port that the Device is attached to. This information might be included in RADIUS requests that are proxied from the infrastructure provider to the ISP RADIUS server.
TOC |
An ATM virtual circuit can be employed between the ISP and infrastructure provider. Providing the virtual port ID (VPI) and virtual circuit ID (VCI) for the virtual circuit gives the infrastructure provider LIS the ability to identify a single data stream. A sample measurement is shown in Figure 15 (Example DSL ATM Measurement).
<measurements xmlns="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:geopriv:lm" time="2008-04-29T14:33:58"> <dsl xmlns="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:geopriv:lm:dsl"> <vpi>55</vpi> <vci>6323</vci> </dsl> </measurements>
Figure 15: Example DSL ATM Measurement |
TOC |
The schema are broken up into their relative functions. There is a base container schema into which all measurements are placed. There is a basic types schema, that contains various base type definitions for things such as the rmsError and samples attributes IPv4, IPv6 and MAC addresses. Then each of the specific measurement types is defined in its own schema.
TOC |
<?xml version="1.0"?> <xs:schema xmlns:lm="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:geopriv:lm" xmlns:xs="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema" targetNamespace="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:geopriv:lm" elementFormDefault="qualified" attributeFormDefault="unqualified"> <xs:annotation> <xs:appinfo source="urn:ietf:params:xml:schema:geopriv:held:lm"> </xs:appinfo> <xs:documentation source="http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfcXXXX.txt"> <!-- [[NOTE TO RFC-EDITOR: Please replace above URL with URL of published RFC and remove this note.]] --> This schema defines a framework for location measurements. </xs:documentation> </xs:annotation> <xs:import namespace="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:geopriv:lm:basetypes"/> <xs:element name="measurements"> <xs:complexType> <xs:complexContent> <xs:restriction base="xs:anyType"> <xs:sequence> <xs:any namespace="##other" processContents="lax" minOccurs="0" maxOccurs="unbounded"/> </xs:sequence> <xs:attribute name="time" type="xs:dateTime"/> <xs:attribute name="timeError" type="bt:positiveDouble"/> <xs:attribute name="expires" type="xs:dateTime"/> <xs:anyAttribute namespace="##any" processContents="lax"/> </xs:restriction> </xs:complexContent> </xs:complexType> </xs:element> </xs:schema>
Measurement Containment Schema |
TOC |
Note that the pattern rules in the following schema wrap due to length constraints. None of the patterns contain whitespace.
<?xml version="1.0"?> <xs:schema xmlns:bt="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:geopriv:lm:basetypes" xmlns:xs="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema" targetNamespace="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:geopriv:lm:basetypes" elementFormDefault="qualified" attributeFormDefault="unqualified"> <xs:annotation> <xs:appinfo source="urn:ietf:params:xml:schema:geopriv:lm:basetypes"> </xs:appinfo> <xs:documentation source="http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfcXXXX.txt"> <!-- [[NOTE TO RFC-EDITOR: Please replace above URL with URL of published RFC and remove this note.]] --> This schema defines a set of base type elements. </xs:documentation> </xs:annotation> <xs:simpleType name="byteType"> <xs:restriction base="xs:integer"> <xs:minInclusive value="0"/> <xs:maxInclusive value="255"/> </xs:restriction> </xs:simpleType> <xs:simpleType name="twoByteType"> <xs:restriction base="xs:integer"> <xs:minInclusive value="0"/> <xs:maxInclusive value="65535"/> </xs:restriction> </xs:simpleType> <xs:simpleType name="nonNegativeDouble"> <xs:restriction base="xs:double"> <xs:minInclusive value="0.0"/> </xs:restriction> </xs:simpleType> <xs:simpleType name="positiveDouble"> <xs:restriction base="bt:nonNegativeDouble"> <xs:minExclusive value="0.0"/> </xs:restriction> </xs:simpleType> <xs:complexType name="doubleWithRMSError"> <xs:simpleContent> <xs:extension base="xs:double"> <xs:attribute name="rmsError" type="bt:positiveDouble"/> <xs:attribute name="samples" type="xs:positiveInteger"/> </xs:extension> </xs:simpleContent> </xs:complexType> <xs:complexType name="nnDoubleWithRMSError"> <xs:simpleContent> <xs:restriction base="bt:doubleWithRMSError"> <xs:minInclusive value="0"/> </xs:restriction> </xs:simpleContent> </xs:complexType> <xs:simpleType name="ipAddressType"> <xs:union memberTypes="bt:IPv6AddressType bt:IPv4AddressType"/> </xs:simpleType> <!-- IPv6 format definition --> <xs:simpleType name="IPv6AddressType"> <xs:annotation> <xs:documentation> An IP version 6 address, based on RFC 4291. </xs:documentation> </xs:annotation> <xs:restriction base="xs:token"> <!-- Fully specified address --> <xs:pattern value="[0-9A-Fa-f]{1,4}(:[0-9A-Fa-f]{1,4}){7}"/> <!-- Double colon start --> <xs:pattern value=":(:[0-9A-Fa-f]{1,4}){1,7}"/> <!-- Double colon middle --> <xs:pattern value="([0-9A-Fa-f]{1,4}:){1,6} (:[0-9A-Fa-f]{1,4}){1}"/> <xs:pattern value="([0-9A-Fa-f]{1,4}:){1,5} (:[0-9A-Fa-f]{1,4}){1,2}"/> <xs:pattern value="([0-9A-Fa-f]{1,4}:){1,4} (:[0-9A-Fa-f]{1,4}){1,3}"/> <xs:pattern value="([0-9A-Fa-f]{1,4}:){1,3} (:[0-9A-Fa-f]{1,4}){1,4}"/> <xs:pattern value="([0-9A-Fa-f]{1,4}:){1,2} (:[0-9A-Fa-f]{1,4}){1,5}"/> <xs:pattern value="([0-9A-Fa-f]{1,4}:){1} (:[0-9A-Fa-f]{1,4}){1,6}"/> <!-- Double colon end --> <xs:pattern value="([0-9A-Fa-f]{1,4}:){1,7}:"/> <!-- IPv4-Compatible and IPv4-Mapped Addresses --> <xs:pattern value="((:(:0{1,4}){0,3}:[fF]{4})|(0{1,4}: (:0{1,4}){0,2}:[fF]{4})|((0{1,4}:){2} (:0{1,4})?:[fF]{4})|((0{1,4}:){3}:[fF]{4}) |((0{1,4}:){4}[fF]{4})):(25[0-5]|2[0-4][0-9]| [0-1]?[0-9]?[0-9])\.(25[0-5]|2[0-4][0-9]|[0-1] ?[0-9]?[0-9])\.(25[0-5]|2[0-4][0-9]|[0-1]? [0-9]?[0-9])\.(25[0-5]|2[0-4][0-9]|[0-1]? [0-9]?[0-9])"/> <!-- The unspecified address --> <xs:pattern value="::"/> </xs:restriction> </xs:simpleType> <!-- IPv4 format definition --> <xs:simpleType name="IPv4AddressType"> <xs:restriction base="xs:token"> <xs:pattern value="(25[0-5]|2[0-4][0-9]|[0-1]?[0-9]?[0-9])\. (25[0-5]|2[0-4][0-9]|[0-1]?[0-9]?[0-9])\. (25[0-5]|2[0-4][0-9]|[0-1]?[0-9]?[0-9])\. (25[0-5]|2[0-4][0-9]|[0-1]?[0-9]?[0-9])"/> </xs:restriction> </xs:simpleType> <!-- IEEE specifies a MAC address as having a - between 2 hex digit pairs --> <xs:simpleType name="macAddressType"> <xs:restriction base="xs:token"> <xs:pattern value="([0-9A-Fa-f]{2}-){5}([0-9A-Fa-f]{2})"/> </xs:restriction> </xs:simpleType> </xs:schema>
Base Type Schema |
TOC |
<?xml version="1.0"?> <xs:schema xmlns:lldp="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:geopriv:lm:lldp" xmlns:bt="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:geopriv:lm:basetypes" xmlns:xs="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema" targetNamespace="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:geopriv:lm:lldp" elementFormDefault="qualified" attributeFormDefault="unqualified"> <xs:annotation> <xs:appinfo source="urn:ietf:params:xml:schema:geopriv:lm:lldp"> </xs:appinfo> <xs:documentation source="http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfcXXXX.txt"> <!-- [[NOTE TO RFC-EDITOR: Please replace above URL with URL of published RFC and remove this note.]] --> This schema defines a set of LLDP location measurements. </xs:documentation> </xs:annotation> <xs:import namespace="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:geopriv:lm:basetypes"/> <xs:element name="lldp" type="lldp:lldpMeasurementType"/> <xs:complexType name="lldpMeasurementType"> <xs:complexContent> <xs:restriction base="xs:anyType"> <xs:sequence> <xs:element name="chassis" type="lldp:lldpDataType"/> <xs:element name="port" type="lldp:lldpDataType"/> <xs:any namespace="##other" processContents="lax" minOccurs="0" maxOccurs="unbounded"/> </xs:sequence> <xs:anyAttribute namespace="##any" processContents="lax"/> </xs:restriction> </xs:complexContent> </xs:complexType> <xs:complexType name="lldpDataType"> <xs:simpleContent> <xs:extension base="lldp:lldpOctetStringType"> <xs:attribute name="type" type="bt:byteType" use="required"/> </xs:extension> </xs:simpleContent> </xs:complexType> <xs:simpleType name="lldpOctetStringType"> <xs:restriction base="xs:hexBinary"> <xs:minLength value="1"/> <xs:maxLength value="255"/> </xs:restriction> </xs:simpleType> </xs:schema>
LLDP measurement schema |
TOC |
<?xml version="1.0"?> <xs:schema xmlns:dhcp="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:geopriv:lm:dhcp" xmlns:xs="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema" xmlns:bt="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:geopriv:lm:basetypes" targetNamespace="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:geopriv:lm:dhcp" elementFormDefault="qualified" attributeFormDefault="unqualified"> <xs:annotation> <xs:appinfo source="urn:ietf:params:xml:schema:geopriv:lm:dhcp"> </xs:appinfo> <xs:documentation source="http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfcXXXX.txt"> <!-- [[NOTE TO RFC-EDITOR: Please replace above URL with URL of published RFC and remove this note.]] --> This schema defines a set of DHCP location measurements. </xs:documentation> </xs:annotation> <xs:import namespace="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:geopriv:lm:basetypes"/> <!-- DHCP Relay Agent Information Option --> <xs:element name="dhcp-rai" type="dhcp:dhcpType"/> <xs:complexType name="dhcpType"> <xs:complexContent> <xs:restriction base="xs:anyType"> <xs:sequence> <xs:element name="giaddr" type="bt:ipAddressType"/> <xs:element name="circuit" type="xs:hexBinary" minOccurs="0"/> <xs:element name="remote" type="dhcp:dhcpRemoteType" minOccurs="0"/> <xs:element name="subscriber" type="xs:hexBinary" minOccurs="0"/> <xs:any namespace="##other" processContents="lax" minOccurs="0" maxOccurs="unbounded"/> </xs:sequence> <xs:anyAttribute namespace="##any" processContents="lax"/> </xs:restriction> </xs:complexContent> </xs:complexType> <xs:complexType name="dhcpRemoteType"> <xs:simpleContent> <xs:extension base="xs:hexBinary"> <xs:attribute name="enterprise" type="xs:positiveInteger" use="optional"/> </xs:extension> </xs:simpleContent> </xs:complexType> </xs:schema>
DHCP measurement schema |
TOC |
<?xml version="1.0"?> <xs:schema xmlns:wifi="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:geopriv:lm:wifi" xmlns:bt="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:geopriv:lm:basetypes" xmlns:xs="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema" targetNamespace="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:geopriv:lm:wifi" elementFormDefault="qualified" attributeFormDefault="unqualified"> <xs:annotation> <xs:appinfo source="urn:ietf:params:xml:schema:geopriv:lm:wifi"> WiFi location measurements </xs:appinfo> <xs:documentation source="http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfcXXXX.txt"> <!-- [[NOTE TO RFC-EDITOR: Please replace above URL with URL of published RFC and remove this note.]] --> This schema defines a basic set of WiFi location measurements. </xs:documentation> </xs:annotation> <xs:import namespace="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:geopriv:lm:basetypes"/> <xs:element name="wifi" type="wifi:wifiNetworkType"/> <xs:complexType name="wifiNetworkType"> <xs:complexContent> <xs:restriction base="xs:anyType"> <xs:sequence> <xs:element name="nicType" type="xs:token" minOccurs="0"/> <xs:choice> <xs:element name="servingWap" type="wifi:wifiType"/> <xs:element name="neighbourWap" type="wifi:wifiType"/> </xs:choice> <xs:element name="neighbourWap" type="wifi:wifiType" minOccurs="0" maxOccurs="unbounded"/> </xs:sequence> <xs:anyAttribute namespace="##any" processContents="lax"/> </xs:restriction> </xs:complexContent> </xs:complexType> <xs:complexType name="wifiType"> <xs:complexContent> <xs:restriction base="xs:anyType"> <xs:sequence> <xs:element name="ssid" type="wifi:ssidBaseType"/> <xs:element name="bssid" type="bt:macAddressType"/> <xs:element name="wapname" type="wifi:ssidBaseType" minOccurs="0"/> <xs:element name="rssi" type="wifi:rssiType" minOccurs="0"/> <xs:any namespace="##other" processContents="lax" minOccurs="0" maxOccurs="unbounded"/> </xs:sequence> <xs:anyAttribute namespace="##any" processContents="lax"/> </xs:restriction> </xs:complexContent> </xs:complexType> <xs:simpleType name="ssidBaseType"> <xs:restriction base="xs:token"> <xs:maxLength value="32"/> </xs:restriction> </xs:simpleType> <xs:complexType name="rssiType"> <xs:simpleContent> <xs:extension base="bt:doubleWithRMSError"> <xs:attribute name="dBm" type="xs:boolean" default="true"/> </xs:extension> </xs:simpleContent> </xs:complexType> </xs:schema>
WiFi measurement schema |
TOC |
<?xml version="1.0"?> <xs:schema xmlns:cell="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:geopriv:lm:cell" xmlns:xs="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema" targetNamespace="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:geopriv:lm:cell" elementFormDefault="qualified" attributeFormDefault="unqualified"> <xs:annotation> <xs:appinfo source="urn:ietf:params:xml:schema:geopriv:lm:cell"> </xs:appinfo> <xs:documentation source="http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfcXXXX.txt"> <!-- [[NOTE TO RFC-EDITOR: Please replace above URL with URL of published RFC and remove this note.]] --> This schema defines a set of cellular location measurements. </xs:documentation> </xs:annotation> <xs:element name="cellular" type="cell:cellularType"/> <xs:complexType name="cellularType"> <xs:complexContent> <xs:restriction base="xs:anyType"> <xs:sequence> <xs:choice> <xs:element name="servingCell" type="cell:cellType"/> <xs:element name="observedCell" type="cell:cellType"/> </xs:choice> <xs:element name="observedCell" type="cell:cellType" minOccurs="0" maxOccurs="unbounded"/> </xs:sequence> <xs:anyAttribute namespace="##any" processContents="lax"/> </xs:restriction> </xs:complexContent> </xs:complexType> <xs:complexType name="cellType"> <xs:complexContent> <xs:restriction base="xs:anyType"> <xs:choice> <xs:sequence> <xs:element name="mcc" type="cell:mccType"/> <xs:element name="mnc" type="cell:mncType"/> <xs:choice> <xs:sequence> <xs:choice> <xs:element name="rnc" type="cell:cellIdType"/> <xs:element name="lac" type="cell:cellIdType"/> </xs:choice> <xs:element name="cid" type="cell:cellIdType"/> </xs:sequence> <xs:sequence> <xs:element name="gid" type="cell:cellIdType"/> <xs:element name="cbid" type="cell:cellIdType"/> </xs:sequence> <xs:sequence> <xs:element name="csg" type="cell:cellIdType"/> <xs:element name="lcid" type="cell:cellIdType"/> </xs:sequence> </xs:choice> <xs:any namespace="##other" processContents="lax" minOccurs="0" maxOccurs="unbounded"/> </xs:sequence> <xs:sequence> <xs:element name="nid" type="cell:cellIdType"/> <xs:element name="sid" type="cell:cellIdType"/> <xs:element name="baseid" type="cell:cellIdType"/> <xs:any namespace="##other" processContents="lax" minOccurs="0" maxOccurs="unbounded"/> </xs:sequence> <xs:any namespace="##other" processContents="lax" minOccurs="0" maxOccurs="unbounded"/> </xs:choice> </xs:restriction> </xs:complexContent> </xs:complexType> <xs:simpleType name="mccType"> <xs:restriction base="xs:token"> <xs:pattern value="[0-9]{3}"/> </xs:restriction> </xs:simpleType> <xs:simpleType name="mncType"> <xs:restriction base="xs:token"> <xs:pattern value="[0-9]{2,3}"/> </xs:restriction> </xs:simpleType> <xs:simpleType name="cellIdType"> <xs:restriction base="xs:nonNegativeInteger"> <xs:maxInclusive value="134217728"/> <!-- 2^27 (csg) --> </xs:restriction> </xs:simpleType> </xs:schema>
Cellular measurement schema |
TOC |
<?xml version="1.0"?> <xs:schema xmlns:gnss="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:geopriv:lm:gnss" xmlns:bt="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:geopriv:lm:basetypes" xmlns:xs="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema" targetNamespace="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:geopriv:lm:gnss" elementFormDefault="qualified" attributeFormDefault="unqualified"> <xs:annotation> <xs:appinfo source="urn:ietf:params:xml:schema:geopriv:lm:gnss"> </xs:appinfo> <xs:documentation source="http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfcXXXX.txt"> <!-- [[NOTE TO RFC-EDITOR: Please replace above URL with URL of published RFC and remove this note.]] --> This schema defines a set of GNSS location measurements </xs:documentation> </xs:annotation> <xs:import namespace="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:geopriv:lm:basetypes"/> <!-- GNSS --> <xs:element name="gnss" type="gnss:gnssMeasurementType"> <xs:unique name="gnssSatellite"> <xs:selector xpath="sat"/> <xs:field xpath="@num"/> </xs:unique> </xs:element> <xs:complexType name="gnssMeasurementType"> <xs:complexContent> <xs:restriction base="xs:anyType"> <xs:sequence> <xs:element name="gnssTime" type="bt:nnDoubleWithRMSError" minOccurs="0"/> <xs:element name="sat" type="gnss:gnssSatelliteType" minOccurs="1" maxOccurs="64"/> <xs:any namespace="##other" processContents="lax" minOccurs="0" maxOccurs="unbounded"/> </xs:sequence> <xs:attribute name="system" type="xs:token" use="required"/> <xs:attribute name="signal" type="xs:token"/> <xs:anyAttribute namespace="##any" processContents="lax"/> </xs:restriction> </xs:complexContent> </xs:complexType> <xs:complexType name="gnssSatelliteType"> <xs:complexContent> <xs:restriction base="xs:anyType"> <xs:sequence> <xs:element name="doppler" type="xs:double"/> <xs:element name="codephase" type="bt:nnDoubleWithRMSError"/> <xs:element name="cn0" type="bt:nonNegativeDouble"/> <xs:element name="mp" type="bt:positiveDouble" minOccurs="0"/> <xs:element name="cq" type="gnss:codePhaseQualityType" minOccurs="0"/> <xs:element name="adr" type="xs:double" minOccurs="0"/> </xs:sequence> <xs:attribute name="num" type="xs:positiveInteger" use="required"/> </xs:restriction> </xs:complexContent> </xs:complexType> <xs:complexType name="codePhaseQualityType"> <xs:complexContent> <xs:restriction base="xs:anyType"> <xs:attribute name="continuous" type="xs:boolean" default="true"/> <xs:attribute name="direct" use="required"> <xs:simpleType> <xs:restriction base="xs:token"> <xs:enumeration value="direct"/> <xs:enumeration value="inverted"/> </xs:restriction> </xs:simpleType> </xs:attribute> </xs:restriction> </xs:complexContent> </xs:complexType> </xs:schema>
GNSS measurement Schema |
TOC |
<?xml version="1.0"?> <xs:schema xmlns:dsl="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:geopriv:lm:dsl" xmlns:bt="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:geopriv:lm:basetypes" xmlns:xs="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema" targetNamespace="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:geopriv:lm:dsl" elementFormDefault="qualified" attributeFormDefault="unqualified"> <xs:annotation> <xs:appinfo source="urn:ietf:params:xml:schema:geopriv:lm:dsl"> DSL measurement definitions </xs:appinfo> <xs:documentation source="http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfcXXXX.txt"> <!-- [[NOTE TO RFC-EDITOR: Please replace above URL with URL of published RFC and remove this note.]] --> This schema defines a basic set of DSL location measurements. </xs:documentation> </xs:annotation> <xs:import namespace="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:geopriv:lm:basetypes"/> <xs:element name="dsl" type="dsl:dslVlanType"/> <xs:complexType name="dslVlanType"> <xs:complexContent> <xs:restriction base="xs:anyType"> <xs:choice> <xs:element name="l2tp"> <xs:complexType> <xs:complexContent> <xs:restriction base="xs:anyType"> <xs:sequence> <xs:element name="src" type="bt:ipAddressType"/> <xs:element name="dest" type="bt:ipAddressType"/> <xs:element name="session" type="xs:nonNegativeInteger"/> </xs:sequence> </xs:restriction> </xs:complexContent> </xs:complexType> </xs:element> <xs:sequence> <xs:element name="an" type="xs:token"/> <xs:group ref="dsl:dslSlotPort"/> </xs:sequence> <xs:sequence> <xs:element name="stag" type="dsl:vlanIDType"/> <xs:choice> <xs:sequence> <xs:element name="ctag" type="dsl:vlanIDType"/> <xs:group ref="dsl:dslSlotPort" minOccurs="0"/> </xs:sequence> <xs:group ref="dsl:dslSlotPort"/> </xs:choice> </xs:sequence> <xs:sequence> <xs:element name="vpi" type="bt:byteType"/> <xs:element name="vci" type="bt:twoByteType"/> </xs:sequence> <xs:any namespace="##other" processContents="lax" minOccurs="0" maxOccurs="unbounded"/> </xs:choice> <xs:anyAttribute namespace="##other" processContents="lax"/> </xs:restriction> </xs:complexContent> </xs:complexType> <xs:simpleType name="vlanIDType"> <xs:restriction base="xs:nonNegativeInteger"> <xs:maxInclusive value="4095"/> </xs:restriction> </xs:simpleType> <xs:group name="dslSlotPort"> <xs:sequence> <xs:element name="slot" type="xs:token"/> <xs:element name="port" type="xs:token"/> </xs:sequence> </xs:group> </xs:schema>
DSL measurement schema |
TOC |
Location-related measurement data are provided by the Device for the sole purpose of generating more accurate location information. The LIS SHOULD NOT retain location-related measurement data for any longer than is necessary to generate location information.
A LIS MUST NOT reveal location-related measurement data to any other entity unless given explicit permission by the Device. This document does not include any means to indicate such permission.
A Device is able to explicitly limit the time that a LIS stores measurement data by adding an expiry time to the measurement data, see Section 4.1.2 (Expiry Time on Location-Related Measurement Data).
Use of measurement data provides an opportunity for a malicious Device to include falsified information in the hopes of causing the LIS to provide a fake, or spoofed, location. If any degree of certitude is assigned to the location provided by the LIS—above that assigned to location provided by the device—the LIS SHOULD verify that the measurement data is correct. Section 3.1 (Using Location-Releated Measurement Data) discusses the risks and limitations involved in the use of measurement data.
TOC |
This section creates a registry for GNSS types (GNSS Measurements) and registers the schema from Section 5 (Measurement Schemas).
TOC |
This document establishes a new IANA registry for Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) types. The registry includes tokens for the GNSS type and for each of the signals within that type. Referring to [RFC2434] (Narten, T. and H. Alvestrand, “Guidelines for Writing an IANA Considerations Section in RFCs,” October 1998.), this registry operates under both "Expert Review" and "Specification Required" rules. The IESG will appoint an Expert Reviewer who will advise IANA promptly on each request for a new or updated GNSS type.
Each entry in the registry requires the following information:
- GNSS name:
- the name and a brief description of the GNSS
- Brief description:
- the name and a brief description of the GNSS
- GNSS token:
- a token that can be used to identify the GNSS
- Signals:
- a set of tokens that represent each of the signals that the system provides
- Documentation reference:
- a reference to one or more stable, public specifications that outline usage of the GNSS, including (but not limited to) signal specifications and time systems
The registry initially includes two registrations:
- GNSS name:
- Global Positioning System (GPS)
- Brief description:
- a system of satellites that use spread-spectrum transmission, operated by the US military for commercial and military applications
- GNSS token:
- gps
- Signals:
- L1, L2, L1C, L2C, L5
- Documentation reference:
- Navstar GPS Space Segment/Navigation User Interface (, “Navstar GPS Space Segment/Navigation User Interface,” Apr 2000.) [GPS.ICD]
- GNSS name:
- Galileo
- Brief description:
- a system of satellites that operate in the same spectrum as GPS, operated by the European Union for commercial applications
- GNSS Token:
- galileo
- Signals:
- L1, E5A, E5B, E5A+B, E6
- Documentation Reference:
- Galileo Open Service Signal In Space Interface Control Document (SIS ICD) (GJU, “Galileo Open Service Signal In Space Interface Control Document (SIS ICD),” May 2006.) [Galileo.ICD]
TOC |
This section registers a new XML namespace, urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:geopriv:lm, as per the guidelines in [RFC3688] (Mealling, M., “The IETF XML Registry,” January 2004.).
URI: urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:geopriv:lm
Registrant Contact: IETF, GEOPRIV working group, (geopriv@ietf.org), Martin Thomson (martin.thomson@andrew.com).
XML:
BEGIN <?xml version="1.0"?> <!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Strict//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-strict.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xml:lang="en"> <head> <title>Measurement Container</title> </head> <body> <h1>Namespace for Location Measurement Container</h1> <h2>urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:geopriv:lm</h2> [[NOTE TO IANA/RFC-EDITOR: Please update RFC URL and replace XXXX with the RFC number for this specification.]] <p>See <a href="[[RFC URL]]">RFCXXXX</a>.</p> </body> </html> END
TOC |
This section registers a new XML namespace, urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:geopriv:lm:basetypes, as per the guidelines in [RFC3688] (Mealling, M., “The IETF XML Registry,” January 2004.).
URI: urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:geopriv:lm:basetypes
Registrant Contact: IETF, GEOPRIV working group, (geopriv@ietf.org), Martin Thomson (martin.thomson@andrew.com).
XML:
BEGIN <?xml version="1.0"?> <!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Strict//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-strict.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xml:lang="en"> <head> <title>Base Device Types</title> </head> <body> <h1>Namespace for Base Types</h1> <h2>urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:geopriv:lm:basetypes</h2> [[NOTE TO IANA/RFC-EDITOR: Please update RFC URL and replace XXXX with the RFC number for this specification.]] <p>See <a href="[[RFC URL]]">RFCXXXX</a>.</p> </body> </html> END
TOC |
This section registers a new XML namespace, urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:geopriv:lm:lldp, as per the guidelines in [RFC3688] (Mealling, M., “The IETF XML Registry,” January 2004.).
URI: urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:geopriv:lm:lldp
Registrant Contact: IETF, GEOPRIV working group, (geopriv@ietf.org), Martin Thomson (martin.thomson@andrew.com).
XML:
BEGIN <?xml version="1.0"?> <!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Strict//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-strict.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xml:lang="en"> <head> <title>LLDP Measurement Set</title> </head> <body> <h1>Namespace for LLDP Measurement Set</h1> <h2>urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:geopriv:lm:lldp</h2> [[NOTE TO IANA/RFC-EDITOR: Please update RFC URL and replace XXXX with the RFC number for this specification.]] <p>See <a href="[[RFC URL]]">RFCXXXX</a>.</p> </body> </html> END
TOC |
This section registers a new XML namespace, urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:geopriv:lm:dhcp, as per the guidelines in [RFC3688] (Mealling, M., “The IETF XML Registry,” January 2004.).
URI: urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:geopriv:lm:dhcp
Registrant Contact: IETF, GEOPRIV working group, (geopriv@ietf.org), Martin Thomson (martin.thomson@andrew.com).
XML:
BEGIN <?xml version="1.0"?> <!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Strict//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-strict.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xml:lang="en"> <head> <title>DHCP Measurement Set</title> </head> <body> <h1>Namespace for DHCP Measurement Set</h1> <h2>urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:geopriv:lm:dhcp</h2> [[NOTE TO IANA/RFC-EDITOR: Please update RFC URL and replace XXXX with the RFC number for this specification.]] <p>See <a href="[[RFC URL]]">RFCXXXX</a>.</p> </body> </html> END
TOC |
This section registers a new XML namespace, urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:geopriv:lm:wifi, as per the guidelines in [RFC3688] (Mealling, M., “The IETF XML Registry,” January 2004.).
URI: urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:geopriv:lm:wifi
Registrant Contact: IETF, GEOPRIV working group, (geopriv@ietf.org), Martin Thomson (martin.thomson@andrew.com).
XML:
BEGIN <?xml version="1.0"?> <!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Strict//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-strict.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xml:lang="en"> <head> <title>WiFi Measurement Set</title> </head> <body> <h1>Namespace for WiFi Measurement Set</h1> <h2>urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:geopriv:lm:wifi</h2> [[NOTE TO IANA/RFC-EDITOR: Please update RFC URL and replace XXXX with the RFC number for this specification.]] <p>See <a href="[[RFC URL]]">RFCXXXX</a>.</p> </body> </html> END
TOC |
This section registers a new XML namespace, urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:geopriv:lm:cell, as per the guidelines in [RFC3688] (Mealling, M., “The IETF XML Registry,” January 2004.).
URI: urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:geopriv:lm:cell
Registrant Contact: IETF, GEOPRIV working group, (geopriv@ietf.org), Martin Thomson (martin.thomson@andrew.com).
XML:
BEGIN <?xml version="1.0"?> <!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Strict//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-strict.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xml:lang="en"> <head> <title>Cellular Measurement Set</title> </head> <body> <h1>Namespace for Cellular Measurement Set</h1> <h2>urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:geopriv:lm:cell</h2> [[NOTE TO IANA/RFC-EDITOR: Please update RFC URL and replace XXXX with the RFC number for this specification.]] <p>See <a href="[[RFC URL]]">RFCXXXX</a>.</p> </body> </html> END
TOC |
This section registers a new XML namespace, urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:geopriv:lm:gnss, as per the guidelines in [RFC3688] (Mealling, M., “The IETF XML Registry,” January 2004.).
URI: urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:geopriv:lm:gnss
Registrant Contact: IETF, GEOPRIV working group, (geopriv@ietf.org), Martin Thomson (martin.thomson@andrew.com).
XML:
BEGIN <?xml version="1.0"?> <!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Strict//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-strict.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xml:lang="en"> <head> <title>GNSS Measurement Set</title> </head> <body> <h1>Namespace for GNSS Measurement Set</h1> <h2>urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:geopriv:lm:gnss</h2> [[NOTE TO IANA/RFC-EDITOR: Please update RFC URL and replace XXXX with the RFC number for this specification.]] <p>See <a href="[[RFC URL]]">RFCXXXX</a>.</p> </body> </html> END
TOC |
This section registers a new XML namespace, urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:geopriv:lm:dsl, as per the guidelines in [RFC3688] (Mealling, M., “The IETF XML Registry,” January 2004.).
URI: urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:geopriv:lm:dsl
Registrant Contact: IETF, GEOPRIV working group, (geopriv@ietf.org), Martin Thomson (martin.thomson@andrew.com).
XML:
BEGIN <?xml version="1.0"?> <!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Strict//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-strict.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xml:lang="en"> <head> <title>DSL Measurement Set</title> </head> <body> <h1>Namespace for DSL Measurement Set</h1> <h2>urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:geopriv:lm:dsl</h2> [[NOTE TO IANA/RFC-EDITOR: Please update RFC URL and replace XXXX with the RFC number for this specification.]] <p>See <a href="[[RFC URL]]">RFCXXXX</a>.</p> </body> </html> END
TOC |
This section registers an XML schema as per the guidelines in [RFC3688] (Mealling, M., “The IETF XML Registry,” January 2004.).
- URI:
- urn:ietf:params:xml:schema:lm
- Registrant Contact:
- IETF, GEOPRIV working group, (geopriv@ietf.org), Martin Thomson (martin.thomson@andrew.com).
- Schema:
- The XML for this schema can be found in Section 5.1 (Measurement Container Schema) of this document.
TOC |
This section registers an XML schema as per the guidelines in [RFC3688] (Mealling, M., “The IETF XML Registry,” January 2004.).
- URI:
- urn:ietf:params:xml:schema:lm:basetypes
- Registrant Contact:
- IETF, GEOPRIV working group, (geopriv@ietf.org), Martin Thomson (martin.thomson@andrew.com).
- Schema:
- The XML for this schema can be found in Section 5.2 (Base Type Schema) of this document.
TOC |
This section registers an XML schema as per the guidelines in [RFC3688] (Mealling, M., “The IETF XML Registry,” January 2004.).
- URI:
- urn:ietf:params:xml:schema:lm:lldp
- Registrant Contact:
- IETF, GEOPRIV working group, (geopriv@ietf.org), Martin Thomson (martin.thomson@andrew.com).
- Schema:
- The XML for this schema can be found in Section 5.3 (LLDP Measurement Schema) of this document.
TOC |
This section registers an XML schema as per the guidelines in [RFC3688] (Mealling, M., “The IETF XML Registry,” January 2004.).
- URI:
- urn:ietf:params:xml:schema:lm:dhcp
- Registrant Contact:
- IETF, GEOPRIV working group, (geopriv@ietf.org), Martin Thomson (martin.thomson@andrew.com).
- Schema:
- The XML for this schema can be found in Section 5.4 (DHCP Measurement Schema) of this document.
TOC |
This section registers an XML schema as per the guidelines in [RFC3688] (Mealling, M., “The IETF XML Registry,” January 2004.).
- URI:
- urn:ietf:params:xml:schema:lm:wifi
- Registrant Contact:
- IETF, GEOPRIV working group, (geopriv@ietf.org), Martin Thomson (martin.thomson@andrew.com).
- Schema:
- The XML for this schema can be found in Section 5.5 (WiFi Measurement Schema) of this document.
TOC |
This section registers an XML schema as per the guidelines in [RFC3688] (Mealling, M., “The IETF XML Registry,” January 2004.).
- URI:
- urn:ietf:params:xml:schema:lm:cellular
- Registrant Contact:
- IETF, GEOPRIV working group, (geopriv@ietf.org), Martin Thomson (martin.thomson@andrew.com).
- Schema:
- The XML for this schema can be found in Section 5.6 (Cellular Measurement Schema) of this document.
TOC |
This section registers an XML schema as per the guidelines in [RFC3688] (Mealling, M., “The IETF XML Registry,” January 2004.).
- URI:
- urn:ietf:params:xml:schema:lm:gnss
- Registrant Contact:
- IETF, GEOPRIV working group, (geopriv@ietf.org), Martin Thomson (martin.thomson@andrew.com).
- Schema:
- The XML for this schema can be found in Section 5.7 (GNSS Measurement Schema) of this document.
TOC |
This section registers an XML schema as per the guidelines in [RFC3688] (Mealling, M., “The IETF XML Registry,” January 2004.).
- URI:
- urn:ietf:params:xml:schema:lm:dsl
- Registrant Contact:
- IETF, GEOPRIV working group, (geopriv@ietf.org), Martin Thomson (martin.thomson@andrew.com).
- Schema:
- The XML for this schema can be found in Section 5.8 (DSL Measurement Schema) of this document.
TOC |
Thanks go to Simon Cox for his comments relating to terminology that have helped ensure that this document is aligns with ongoing work in the Open Geospatial Consortium (OGC). Thanks to Neil Harper for his review and comments on the GNSS sections of this document. Thanks to Noor-E-Gagan Singh for his suggestions relating to the WiFi section of this document.
TOC |
TOC |
[RFC2119] | Bradner, S., “Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate Requirement Levels,” BCP 14, RFC 2119, March 1997 (TXT, HTML, XML). |
[RFC2434] | Narten, T. and H. Alvestrand, “Guidelines for Writing an IANA Considerations Section in RFCs,” BCP 26, RFC 2434, October 1998 (TXT, HTML, XML). |
[I-D.ietf-geopriv-http-location-delivery] | Barnes, M., Winterbottom, J., Thomson, M., and B. Stark, “HTTP Enabled Location Delivery (HELD),” draft-ietf-geopriv-http-location-delivery-16 (work in progress), August 2009 (TXT). |
TOC |
[RFC3693] | Cuellar, J., Morris, J., Mulligan, D., Peterson, J., and J. Polk, “Geopriv Requirements,” RFC 3693, February 2004 (TXT). |
[RFC3046] | Patrick, M., “DHCP Relay Agent Information Option,” RFC 3046, January 2001 (TXT). |
[RFC4649] | Volz, B., “Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol for IPv6 (DHCPv6) Relay Agent Remote-ID Option,” RFC 4649, August 2006 (TXT). |
[IANA.enterprise] | IANA, “Private Enterprise Numbers.” |
[RFC3993] | Johnson, R., Palaniappan, T., and M. Stapp, “Subscriber-ID Suboption for the Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol (DHCP) Relay Agent Option,” RFC 3993, March 2005 (TXT). |
[RFC4580] | Volz, B., “Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol for IPv6 (DHCPv6) Relay Agent Subscriber-ID Option,” RFC 4580, June 2006 (TXT). |
[RFC3688] | Mealling, M., “The IETF XML Registry,” BCP 81, RFC 3688, January 2004 (TXT). |
[IEEE.8021AB] | IEEE, “IEEE Standard for Local and Metropolitan area networks, Station and Media Access Control Connectivity Discovery,” 802.1AB, June 2005. |
[GPS.ICD] | “Navstar GPS Space Segment/Navigation User Interface,” ICD GPS-200, Apr 2000. |
[Galileo.ICD] | GJU, “Galileo Open Service Signal In Space Interface Control Document (SIS ICD),” May 2006. |
[I-D.winterbottom-geopriv-lis2lis-req] | Winterbottom, J. and S. Norreys, “LIS to LIS Protocol Requirements,” draft-winterbottom-geopriv-lis2lis-req-01 (work in progress), November 2007 (TXT). |
[DSL.TR025] | Wang, R., “Core Network Architecture Recommendations for Access to Legacy Data Networks over ADSL,” September 1999. |
[DSL.TR101] | Cohen, A. and E. Shrum, “Migration to Ethernet-Based DSl Aggregation,” April 2006. |
[RFC2865] | Rigney, C., Willens, S., Rubens, A., and W. Simpson, “Remote Authentication Dial In User Service (RADIUS),” RFC 2865, June 2000 (TXT). |
[RFC4291] | Hinden, R. and S. Deering, “IP Version 6 Addressing Architecture,” RFC 4291, February 2006 (TXT). |
TOC |
Martin Thomson | |
Andrew | |
PO Box U40 | |
Wollongong University Campus, NSW 2500 | |
AU | |
Phone: | +61 2 4221 2915 |
Email: | martin.thomson@andrew.com |
URI: | http://www.andrew.com/ |
James Winterbottom | |
Andrew | |
PO Box U40 | |
Wollongong University Campus, NSW 2500 | |
AU | |
Phone: | +61 2 4221 2938 |
Email: | james.winterbottom@andrew.com |
URI: | http://www.andrew.com/ |
TOC |
Copyright © The IETF Trust (2008).
This document is subject to the rights, licenses and restrictions contained in BCP 78, and except as set forth therein, the authors retain all their rights.
This document and the information contained herein are provided on an “AS IS” basis and THE CONTRIBUTOR, THE ORGANIZATION HE/SHE REPRESENTS OR IS SPONSORED BY (IF ANY), THE INTERNET SOCIETY, THE IETF TRUST AND THE INTERNET ENGINEERING TASK FORCE DISCLAIM ALL WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO ANY WARRANTY THAT THE USE OF THE INFORMATION HEREIN WILL NOT INFRINGE ANY RIGHTS OR ANY IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.
The IETF takes no position regarding the validity or scope of any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights that might be claimed to pertain to the implementation or use of the technology described in this document or the extent to which any license under such rights might or might not be available; nor does it represent that it has made any independent effort to identify any such rights. Information on the procedures with respect to rights in RFC documents can be found in BCP 78 and BCP 79.
Copies of IPR disclosures made to the IETF Secretariat and any assurances of licenses to be made available, or the result of an attempt made to obtain a general license or permission for the use of such proprietary rights by implementers or users of this specification can be obtained from the IETF on-line IPR repository at http://www.ietf.org/ipr.
The IETF invites any interested party to bring to its attention any copyrights, patents or patent applications, or other proprietary rights that may cover technology that may be required to implement this standard. Please address the information to the IETF at ietf-ipr@ietf.org.