IPFIX Working Group | B. Trammell |
Internet-Draft | ETH Zurich |
Intended status: Informational | P. Aitken |
Expires: March 10, 2014 | Cisco Systems, Inc |
September 06, 2013 |
Revision of the tcpControlBits IPFIX Information Element
draft-trammell-ipfix-tcpcontrolbits-revision-01.txt
This document revises the tcpControlBits IPFIX Information Element defined in [RFC5102] to reflect changes to the TCP Flags header field since [RFC0793].
This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79.
Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF). Note that other groups may also distribute working documents as Internet-Drafts. The list of current Internet-Drafts is at http://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/.
Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."
This Internet-Draft will expire on March 10, 2014.
Copyright (c) 2013 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the document authors. All rights reserved.
This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal Provisions Relating to IETF Documents (http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of publication of this document. Please review these documents carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect to this document. Code Components extracted from this document must include Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as described in the Simplified BSD License.
The first 16 bits of the TCP header contain four bits of encoded header length as well as 12 bits of flags. The least significant 6 bits of these were defined in [RFC0793] as URG, ACK, PSH, RST, SYN, and FIN for TCP control. Subsequently, [RFC3168] defined the CWR and ECE flags for Explicit Congestion Notification (ECN) negotiation and signaling; [RFC3540] additionally defined the NS flag for the ECN Nonce Sum.
As defined in the IANA IPFIX Information Element Registry [IANA-IPFIX], taken from [RFC5102], the tcpControlBits Information Element for IPFIX [I-D.ietf-ipfix-protocol-rfc5101bis] only covers the original six bits from [RFC0793]. To allow IPFIX to be used to measure the use of ECN, and to bring the IPFIX Information Element definition in line with the current definition of the TCP Flags header field, it is necessary to revise this definition.
The revised definition of the Information Element in Section 2 was developed and approved through the IE-DOCTORS process [I-D.ietf-ipfix-ie-doctors] in August 2013. Section 5.1 of [I-D.ietf-ipfix-ie-doctors] states "This process should not in any way be construed as allowing the IE-DOCTORS to overrule IETF consensus. Specifically, Information Elements in the IANA IE registry which were added with IETF consensus require IETF consensus for revision or deprecation". Since the tcpControlBits Information Element was defined in [RFC5102], an IETF Proposed Standard, any revision of this Information Element definition requires IETF Consensus. The publication of this document fulfills that requirement.
The following section defines the revised tcpControlBits Information Element as in Section 9.1 of [I-D.ietf-ipfix-ie-doctors].
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 +---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+ | | | N | C | E | U | A | P | R | S | F | | Header Length | Reserved | S | W | C | R | C | S | S | Y | I | | | | | R | E | G | K | H | T | N | N | +---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+ bit flag value name description ------+-----+------------------------------------- 0x8000 Zero (see tcpHeaderLength) 0x4000 Zero (see tcpHeaderLength) 0x2000 Zero (see tcpHeaderLength) 0x1000 Zero (see tcpHeaderLength) 0x0800 Future Use 0x0400 Future Use 0x0200 Future Use 0x0100 NS ECN Nonce Sum 0x0080 CWR Congestion Window Reduced 0x0040 ECE ECN Echo 0x0020 URG Urgent Pointer field significant 0x0010 ACK Acknowledgment field significant 0x0008 PSH Push Function 0x0004 RST Reset the connection 0x0002 SYN Synchronize sequence numbers 0x0001 FIN No more data from sender
IANA will update the definition of the tcpControlBits Information Element in the the IANA IPFIX Information Element Registry [IANA-IPFIX] to reflect the changes in Section 2 above.
This document has no security or privacy considerations; the security considerations for IPFIX [I-D.ietf-ipfix-protocol-rfc5101bis] apply.
Thanks to Andrew Feren for comments on the revised definition. This work is partially supported by the European Commission under grant agreement FP7-ICT-318627 mPlane; this does not imply endorsement by the Commission.
[I-D.ietf-ipfix-protocol-rfc5101bis] | Claise, B. and B. Trammell, "Specification of the IP Flow Information eXport (IPFIX) Protocol for the Exchange of Flow Information", Internet-Draft draft-ietf-ipfix-protocol-rfc5101bis-06, February 2013. |
[I-D.ietf-ipfix-ie-doctors] | Trammell, B. and B. Claise, "Guidelines for Authors and Reviewers of IPFIX Information Elements", Internet-Draft draft-ietf-ipfix-ie-doctors-07, October 2012. |
[RFC0793] | Postel, J., "Transmission Control Protocol", STD 7, RFC 793, September 1981. |
[RFC3168] | Ramakrishnan, K., Floyd, S. and D. Black, "The Addition of Explicit Congestion Notification (ECN) to IP", RFC 3168, September 2001. |
[RFC3540] | Spring, N., Wetherall, D. and D. Ely, "Robust Explicit Congestion Notification (ECN) Signaling with Nonces", RFC 3540, June 2003. |
[RFC5102] | Quittek, J., Bryant, S., Claise, B., Aitken, P. and J. Meyer, "Information Model for IP Flow Information Export", RFC 5102, January 2008. |
[IANA-IPFIX] | Internet Assigned Numbers Authority, , "IP Flow Information Export Information Elements (http://www.iana.org/assignments/ipfix)", . |