A Configuration File Format for Extensible Authentication Protocol (EAP) Deployments
draft-winter-opsawg-eap-metadata-02

Abstract

This document specifies a YANG module and derived XML and JSON file formats for transfering configuration information of deployments of the Extensible Authentication Protocol (EAP). Such configuration files are meant to be discovered, consumed and used by EAP supplicant software to achieve secure and automatic EAP configuration on the consuming device.

Status of This Memo

This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79.

Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF). Note that other groups may also distribute working documents as Internet-Drafts. The list of current Internet-Drafts is at http://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/.

Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."

This Internet-Draft will expire on January 7, 2016.

Copyright Notice

Copyright (c) 2015 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the document authors. All rights reserved.

This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal Provisions Relating to IETF Documents (http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of publication of this document. Please review these documents carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect to this document.

Table of Contents

• 1. Introduction
• 1.1. Problem Statement
• 1.2. Other Approaches
• 1.3. Requirements Language
• 1.4. Terminology
• 2. YANG module for EAP Metadata
• 2.1. Location of the YANG module and derived XML Schema
• 2.2. Description of YANG Module Elements
• 2.2.1. Overall structure
• 2.2.2. The 'AuthenticationMethods' container
• 2.2.3. The 'ProviderInfo' container
• 2.3. Internationalisation / Multi-language support
• 3. Derivation of formats from YANG source
• 4. Issuer Authentication, Integrity Protection and Encryption of EAP Metadata configuration files
• 5. XML Farget Format: File Discovery
• 5.1. By MIME-Type: application/eap-config-xml
• 5.2. By filename extension: .eap-config-xml
• 5.3. By network location: SCAD
• 6. Design Decisions
• 6.1. Why YANG and not directly XML, JSON or $FOO?
• 6.2. Shallow vs. Deep definition of EAP method properties
• 6.3. EAP tunneling inside EAP tunnels
• 6.4. Placement of 'OuterIdentity' inside 'AuthenticationMethod'
• 7. Implementation Status
• 8. Security Considerations
• 9. IANA Considerations
• 10. Contributors
• 11. References
• 11.1. Normative References
• 11.2. Informative References
• Appendix A. Appendix A: MIME Type Registration Template
• Author's Address

1. Introduction

1.1. Problem Statement

The IETF has produced the Extensible Authentication Protocol (EAP, [RFC3748] and numerous EAP methods (for example EAP-TTLS [RFC5281], EAP-TLS [RFC5216] and EAP-pwd [RFC5931]); the methods have many properties which need to be setup on the EAP server and matched as configuration items on the EAP peer for a secure EAP deployment.

Setting up these configuration items is comparatively easy if the end-user devices which implement the EAP peer functionality are under central administrative control, e.g. in closed enterprise environments. Group policies or device provisioning by the IT department can push the settings to user devices.

In other environments, for example "BYOD" scenarios where users bring their own devices which are not under enterprise control, or in EAP-based WISP environments (see e.g. [HS20] and [I-D.wierenga-ietf-eduroam]) where it is not desired neither for the ISP nor for his user that the device control is in the ISPs hands, configuration of EAP is significantly harder as it has to be done by potentially very non-technical end users.

Correct configuration of all EAP deployment parameters is required to make the resulting authentications

• functional (i.e. the end user can authenticate to an EAP server at all)
• secure (i.e. the end user device can unambiguously authenticate the EAP server prior to releasing any sensitive client-side credentials)
• privacy-preserving (i.e. the end user is able to conceal his username from the EAP authenticator)

It would be desirable to be able to convey the EAP configuration information of a deployment in a machine parseable way to the end-user device, so that all the gory details need not be known/understood by the user. Instead, the EAP peer software on the device could consume the configuration information and set up all EAP authentication details automatically.

However, there is currently no standard way of communicating configuration parameters about an EAP setup to the EAP peer.

This specification defines such file formats for EAP configuration metadata. The source definition is a YANG module which allows for automatic derivation of XML and JSON formats.

The specification allows for unique identification of an EAP identity provider by scoping it into a namespace and giving it a unique name inside that namespace. Using this unique identification, other configuration files (which e.g. detail the wireless media properties of an Enterprise Wi-Fi setup) can then refer to this particular instance of EAP identity information as authentication source. The contents of the EAP configuration file may also be an embedded part of those other configuration files.

1.2. Other Approaches

Device manufacturers sometimes have developed their own proprietary configuration formats, examples include Apple's "mobileconfig" (MIME type application/x-apple-aspen-config), Microsoft's XML schemata for EAP methods for use with the command-line "netsh" tool, or Intel's "PRO/Set Wireless" binary configuration files. The multitude of proprietary file formats and their different levels of richness in expression of EAP details create a very heterogenous and non-interoperable landscape.

New devices which would like to benefit from machine-parseable EAP configuration currently either have to choose to follow a competitor's approach and use that competitor's file format or have to develop their own. This situation is very unsatisfactory.

1.3. Requirements Language

In this document, several words are used to signify the requirements of the specification. The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT", "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described in RFC 2119. [RFC2119]

1.4. Terminology

2. YANG module for EAP Metadata

2.1. Location of the YANG module and derived XML Schema

The schema files are currently hosted on this location:

• YANG module: https://www.supplicants.net/site/standardisation/eap-metadata-02.yang
• XML Schema: https://www.supplicants.net/site/standardisation/eap-metadata-02.xml

2.2. Description of YANG Module Elements

2.2.1. Overall structure

The root element is the container 'EAPIdentityProviderList', which contains a list of 'EAPIdentityProvider' elements; these carry the actual EAP configuration information for this identity provider. In most practical applications, the 'EAPIdentityProviderList' will contain only a single element; a longer list can be used for metadata transfers between systems or to allow users to select from a set of providers in one file.

The global uniqueness of each 'EAPIdentityProvider' is ensured by the combination of the two leafs 'NameIDFormat' which provides a namespace identifier, and 'ID' which specifies the unique name inside the namespace. The other leafs and containers in the 'EAPIdentityProvider' list are:

• zero or one 'ValidUntil' date-and-time timestamp with an indication of possible expiry of the information in the configuration file. EAP peers importing the configuration file can use this information for example to re-assess whether the account is still valid (e.g. if the ValidUntil timestamp has passed, and authentication attempts consistently fail, the supplicant should consider the information stale and ask the user to verify his access authorisation with the EAP identity provider)
• exactly one 'AuthenticationMethods' container with a list of EAP methods which the EAPIdentityProvider supports. This container is described in more detail in section Section 2.2.2
• zero or one 'ProviderInfo' container can provide additional information about the EAPIdentityProvider, e.g. a logo to allow visual identification of the provider to the user in a user interface, or Acceptable Use Policies pertaining to the use of this EAP identity. This element is described in more detail in section Section 2.2.3

2.2.2. The 'AuthenticationMethods' container

'AuthenticationMethods' contains a sequence of 'AuthenticationMethod' groupings. Each such grouping specifies the properties of one supported authentication method of an EAPIdentityProvider. The content of this grouping is enumerated in section Section 2.2.2.1 The set of configuration parameters specified in the grouping depends on the particular EAP method to be configured.

For instance, EAP-PWD [RFC5931] does not require any server certificate parameters; EAP-FAST and TEAP are the only ones making use of Protected Access Credential (PAC) provisioning. On the other hand, properties such as outer ("anonymous") identity or the need for a trusted root Certification Authority are common to several EAP methods. The server- and client-side credential types of EAP methods are defined as a flat list of elements to choose from (see 'ServerSideCredential' and 'ClientSideCredential' below); see section Section 6.2 for a rationale.

Where the sequence of 'AuthenticationMethod' groupings contains more than one element, the order of appearance in the file indicates the server operator's preference for the supported EAP types; occurences earlier in the file indicate a more preferred authentication method.

When a consuming device receives multiple 'AuthenticationMethod' groupings inside 'AuthenticationMethods', it should attempt to install more preferred methods first. During interactive provisioning of EAP properties, if the configuration information for a preferred method is insufficient (e.g. the 'AuthenticationMethod' is EAP-TLS, but the configuration file does not contain the client certificate/private key and the device's credential store is not pre-loaded with the client's certificate), the device should query whether this more preferred method should be used (requiring the user to supplement the missing data) or whether a less-preferred method should be configured instead. In non-interactive provisioning scenarios, all methods should be tried non-interactively in order until one method can be installed; if no method can be installed in a fully automated way, provisioning is aborted.

2.2.2.1. Authentication Method Properties

The 'AuthenticationMethod' grouping contains

• exactly one 'EAPMethod' leaf, which is an enumerated integer of the EAP method identifier as assigned by IANA (typedef eap-method)
• zero or one container 'ServerSideCredential' which defines means to authenticate the EAP server to the EAP peer (for a list of the elements comprising this container, see section Section 2.2.2.2)
• zero or one container 'ClientSideCredential' which defines means to authenticate the EAP peer to the EAP server (for a list of the elements comprising this container, see section Section 2.2.2.3)
• zero or more 'InnerAuthenticationMethod' lists. Occurence of this list indicates that a tunneled EAP method is in use, and that further server-side and/or client-side credentials are defined inside the tunnel. The presence of more than one 'InnerAuthenticationMethod' indicates that EAP Method Chaining is in use, i.e. that several inner EAP methods are to be executed in sequence inside the tunnel. The order of occurence of the inner EAP methods defines the chaining order of the methods.

The 'InnerAuthenticationMethod' list itself contains the same 'EAPMethod', 'ServerSideCredentials' and 'ClientSideCredentials' elements as described in the preceding list, but differs in two points:

• It can optionally contain the leaf 'NonEAPAuthMethod' (an enumerated integer of authentication methods not based on EAP) instead of 'EAPMethod' because some tunneled EAP types do not necessarily contain EAP inside the tunnel (e.g. TTLS-PAP, TEAP). The YANG definition ensures that EAPMethod and NonEAPAuthMethod are mutually exclusive in instantiations of the YANG module.
• It can NOT contain a further 'InnerAuthenticationMethod' because establishing a secure tunnel inside an already established secure tunnel is considered a pathological case which needs not be considered. See section Section 6.3 for a rationale.

2.2.2.2. The 'ServerSideCredential' container

The server-side authentication of a mutually authenticating EAP method is typically based on X.509 certificates, which requires the EAP peer to be pre-provisioned with one or more trusted root Certification Authority (CA) prior to authenticating. A server is uniquely identified by presenting a certificate which is signed by these trusted CAs, and by the EAP peer verifying that the name of the server matches the expected one. Consequently, a (set of) CAs and a (set of) server names make up the ServerSideCredentials block.

Note that different EAP methods use different terminology when referring to trusted CA roots, server certificates, and server name identification. They also differ or have inherent ambiguity in their interpretation on where to extract the server name from (e.g. is the server name the CN part of the DistinguishedName, or is the server name one of the subjectAltName:DNS entries; what to do if there is a mismatch?). This specification introduces one single element for CA trust roots and naming; these notions map into the naming of the particular EAP methods very naturally. This specification can not remove the CN vs. sAN:DNS ambiguity in many EAP methods.

• zero or more 'CA' lists: a Certification Authority which is trusted to sign the expected server certificate. The set of 'CA' occurences SHOULD contain self-signed root certificates to establish trust, and MAY contain additional intermediate CA certificates which ultimately root in these self-signed root CAs. A configuration file can, but SHOULD NOT include only an intermediate CA certificate (i.e. without also including the corresponding self-signed root) because trusting only an intermediate CA without being able to verify to a self-signed root is an unsupported notion in many EAP peers.
• zero or more 'ServerID' leafs: these leafs contain the expected server names in incoming X.509 EAP server certificates. For EAP methods not using X.509 certificates for their mutual authentication, these elements contain other string-based handles which identify the server (Example: EAP-pwd).

2.2.2.3. The 'ClientSideCredential' container

There is a variety of means to identify the EAP peer to the EAP server. EAP methods use a subset of these criteria. As with server-side credentials, the terminology for the credential type may differ slightly between EAP types. The naming convention in this specification maps nicely into the method-specific terminology. Not all the criteria make sense in all contexts; for EAP methods which do not support a criterion, configuration files SHOULD NOT contain the corresponding elements, and consumers of the file MUST ignore these elements.

Specifying any one of these elements is optional and they can occur at most once. Consumers of configuration files MUST be able to fall back to user-interactive configuration for these parts if they are not specified (e.g. ask for the username and password for an EAP method during import of the EAP configuration data). Configuration files which contain sensitive elements such as 'Password' MUST be handled with due care after the import on the device (e.g. ensure minimal file permissions, or delete the source file after installing). See also the leaf 'allow-save' below.

• The leaf 'allow-save' specifies whether consumers should allow the user to save the credential persistently; if it is set to false, sensitive parts of the client-side credentials MUST NOT be persistently saved on the device. See also section Section 4 for transport security considerations.
• Leaf 'AnonymousIdentity' is typically used on the outside of a tunneled EAP method and allows to specify which user identity should be used outside the tunnel. This string is not used for actual user authentication, but may contain routing hints to send the request to the right EAP server.
• 'UserName' contains the actual username to be used for user authentication. For tunneled EAP methods, this element SHOULD only occur in the 'InnerAuthenticationMethod's 'ClientSideCredentials' - if differing outer identities are not desired in the deployment, the 'OuterIdentity' element should be populated for the 'AuthenticationMethod' element but be populated with the actual username then.
• The 'ClientCertificate' container holds a X.509 certificate and private key; if the key is protected, the 'Passphrase' leaf MAY be used to indicate the passphrase, see below
• 'Passphrase' contains the passphrase needed to unlock a cryptographic credential internally on the device (i.e. it is not used itself for the actual authentication during the EAP conversation)
• 'Password' contains the user's password, or an otherwise secret string which the user needs to authenticate to the EAP server
• 'PAC' contains the Protected Access Credential, typically used in EAP-FAST and TEAP.
• 'ProvisionPAC' is a boolean which indicates whether a PAC should be provisioned on the first connection. Note that this specification allows to use 'ProvisionPAC' without a CA nor ServerID in 'ServerSideCredential'. While this allows the operation mode of "Anonymous PAC Provisioning" as used in many field deployments of EAP-FAST (and is thus supported here), due to the known security vulnerabilities of anonymous PAC provisioning, this combination SHOULD NOT be used.

2.2.3. The 'ProviderInfo' container

This specification needs to consider that user interaction during the installation time may be required; the user at the very least must be empowered to decide whether the configuration file was issued by a provider he has an account with; the provider may have hints for the user (e.g. which password to use for the login), or may want to display links to helpdesk pages in case the user has problems with the setup or use of his identity.

The 'ProviderInfo' container allows to specify a range of potentially useful information for display to the user (some of which is relevant only during installation time, other pieces of information could be retained by the EAP peer implementation and displayed e.g. in case of failed authentication):

• 'DisplayName' specifies a user-friendly name for the EAP Identity Provider. Consumers of this specification should be aware that this is simple text, and self-asserted by the producer of the configuration file. If more authoritative information about the issuer is available (e.g. if the file is signed with S/MIME and carries an Organisation name (O attribute) in the signing certificate) then the more authoritative information should be displayed with more prominence than the self-asserted one.
• 'Description' specifies a generic descriptive text which should be displayed to the user prior to the installation of the configuration data.
• 'ProviderLocation' specifies the approximate geographic location(s) of the EAP Identity Provider and/or his Points of Presence. This can be useful if the configuration file contains multiple 'EAPIdentityProvider' elements; the user device can then make an informed guess which of the Identity Providers could be a good match to suggest to the user.
• 'ProviderLogo' specifies the logo of the EAP Identity Provider. The same self-assertion considerations as for 'DisplayName' above apply.
• 'TermsOfUse' contains terms of use to be displayed to and acknowledged by the user prior to the installation of the configuration on the user's system
• 'Helpdesk' is a container with three possible sub-elements: 'EmailAddress', 'WebAddress' and 'Phone', all of which can be displayed to the user and possibly retained for future debugging hints.

2.3. Internationalisation / Multi-language support

Some elements in this specification contain text to be displayed in User Interfaces; depending on the user's language preferences, it would be desirable to present the information in a local language. Other elements contain contact information, and those contact points may only be able to handle requests in a number of languages; it may be desirable to present only contact points to the user which are compatible with his language capabilities.

All elements which either contain localisable text, or which point to external resources in localised languages, use the grouping 'localized-non-interactive' or 'localized-interactive'. These groupings can occur more than once in the specification, which enables an iteration of all applicable languages. If the grouping is omitted or its 'lang' leaf is set to "C", the instance of the element is considered a default choice which is to be displayed if no other language is a better match.

If the entire file content consistently uses only one language set, e.g. all the elements are to be treated as "default" choices, the language can also be set for the entire 'EAPIdentityProvider' element in its own 'lang-tag' leaf.

3. Derivation of formats from YANG source

The utility 'pyang' is used to derive XML Schema (XSD) from the YANG source. The Schema for this Internet-Draft was generated with pyang 1.4.1.

4. Issuer Authentication, Integrity Protection and Encryption of EAP Metadata configuration files

S/MIME or underlying transport security. Nuff said :-)

5. XML Farget Format: File Discovery

5.1. By MIME-Type: application/eap-config-xml

For transports where the categorisation of file types via MIME types is possible (e.g. HTTP, E-Mail), this document assigns the MIME type

application/eap-config-xml

Edge devices can associate this MIME type to incoming files on such transports, and register the application which can consume the EAP Metadata in XML format as the default handler for this file type. By doing so, for example a single click or tap on a link to the file in the device's browser will invoke the configuration process.

This method of discovery is analogous to the Apple "mobileconfig" discovery on recent versions of Mac OS and iOS.

5.2. By filename extension: .eap-config-xml

In situations where file types can not be determined by MIME type meta-information (e.g. when the file gets stored on a local filesystem), this document RECOMMENDs that EAP Metadata in XML format files be stored with the extension

.eap-config-xml

to identify the file as containing EAP Metadata configuration information in XML format. Edge devices can register the application which can consume the EAP Metadata with this file extension. By doing so, for example a single click or tap on the filename in the device's User Interface will invoke the configuration process.

5.3. By network location: SCAD

6. Design Decisions

6.1. Why YANG and not directly XML, JSON or $FOO?

XML is a popular choice for EAP configurations: Microsoft's "netsh" files, Apple's "mobileconfig" files, the Wi-Fi Alliance's "PerProviderSubscription Managed Object", and other vendor/SDO definitions are all using XML.

JSON file formats for EAP configuration exist as well; most notable are Google's most recent efforts for their Chromebook Operating system.

YANG has a very rich feature set, and can codify restrictions on which element is allowed when in a much more fine-grained way than XML Schema could. Since YANG modules can be converted to XML Schema and be instantiated as XML or JSON, they can serve as an abstract notion of EAP configuration which can be deployed on consumer devices in either of those two more popular formats as needed by the device in question.

6.2. Shallow vs. Deep definition of EAP method properties

6.3. EAP tunneling inside EAP tunnels

6.4. Placement of 'OuterIdentity' inside 'AuthenticationMethod'

7. Implementation Status

RFC Editor Note: Please remove this section and the reference to [RFC6982] prior to publication.

This section records the status of known implementations of the protocol defined by this specification at the time of posting of this Internet-Draft, and is based on a proposal described in [RFC6982]. The description of implementations in this section is intended to assist the IETF in its decision processes in progressing drafts to RFCs. Please note that the listing of any individual implementation here does not imply endorsement by the IETF. Furthermore, no effort has been spent to verify the information presented here that was supplied by IETF contributors. This is not intended as, and must not be construed to be, a catalog of available implementations or their features. Readers are advised to note that other implementations may exist.

According to [RFC6982], "this will allow reviewers and working groups to assign due consideration to documents that have the benefit of running code, which may serve as evidence of valuable experimentation and feedback that have made the implemented protocols more mature. It is up to the individual working groups to use this information as they see fit".

All of the implementations listed below interoperate from producer- to consumer-side of the EAP metadata specification.

Producers of the configuration files

• eduroam Configuration Assistant Tool
  • Organisation: Nicolaus Copernicus University, Torun, Poland
  • Implementation Name: eduroam Configuration Assistant Tool
  • This existing tool already produces EAP configuration files in various proprietary formats for hundreds of EAP Identity Providers. A module which produces configuration files in the XML variant as specified in an eralier revision of this draft (-00) is in production deployment.
  • Link to production version: https://cat.eduroam.org
  • Maturity: production
  • Coverage: entire specification; XML structure aligns with version -00 of this draft
  • Licensing: freely distributable with acknowledgement (BSD style)
  • Implementation experience: given that the specification is XML, it is easy to produce a configuration file with common XML libraries. The CAT Framework is written in PHP, which provides ample procedures to produce well-formed XML.
  • Contact Information: Tomasz Wolniewicz (see Section 10); the CAT software homepage at http://forge.geant.net/CAT/

Consumers of the configuration files

• Android
  • Organisation: Swansea University, Swansea, Wales, U.K.
  • Implementation Name: eduroam CAT app
  • An Android app, compatible with API level 18 of Android (i.e. version 4.3 and above); the app consumes the -00 revision of this specification. The information in the config files is used to push settings to the SSID 'eduroam' (hard-coded) via the WifiEnterpriseConfig API. The app is in production deployment, with a 4-four digit amount of downloads one month after launch.
  • Link to production version: https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=uk.ac.swansea.eduroamcat
  • Maturity: production
  • Coverage: entire specification; XML structure aligns with version -00 of this draft
  • Licensing: Apache 2.0
  • Implementation experience: parsing XML is rather straightfoward. The ability to verify signatures on XML files (S/MIME vs. XMLDSIG as discussed in Section 4) remains unclear at this point.
  • Contact Information: eduroam CAT Play Store app contact address ( playstore@eduroam.org )

• Windows
  • Organisation: Amebis, d.o.o.i, Kamnik, Slovenia
  • Implementation Name: ArnesLink
  • A Windows supplicant/Enterprise WiFi installer/debugging assistant. The application consumes the -02 revision of this specification. The information from the XML variant of this specification is embedded in a larger XML file. The additional parts of the overall configuration file include information regarding the SSID to configure and other useful, but not EAP-specific information. The complete set of information is used to push settings into the Windows Wi-Fi configuration via the 'netsh' tool. The app is in production deployment.
  • Link to production version: http://ftp.arnes.si/software/eduroam/ArnesLink/
  • Maturity: production
  • Coverage: entire specification; XML structure aligns with version -02 of this draft
  • Licensing: GPL
  • Implementation experience: parsing XML is rather straightfoward. For Wi-Fi configuration use, the lack of 802.11 specific details in the config file is an issue.
  • Contact Information: info@amebis.si

• Linux: the authors of this specification are currently developing an application for UNIX-like operating systems which configure enterprise networks via the NetworkManager daemon; the application can consume the file format as defined in this draft specification (XML format) and configure the settings via Networkmanager's D-BUS interface.

8. Security Considerations

9. IANA Considerations

IANA is requested to allocate the MIME type "application/eap-config-xml" in the MIME Media Types / application registry (see section Section 5.1). The allocation should contain the following values:

• Name: eap-config-xml
• Template: see Appendix A (RFC editor note: remove this appendix prior to publication; replace this line with the URL to the application as posted online)
• Reference: RFCabcd (RFC editor note: replace with the RFC number of this document)

IANA is requested to allocate the location "TBD" in the "well-known URIs" registry. The allocation should contain the following values:

• URI Suffix: TBD
• Change Controller: IETF
• Reference: RFCabcd (RFC editor note: replace with the RFC number of this document)
• Related Information: none

IANA is requested to register the XML namespace "urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:eap-config-xml" in the "IETF XML Registry / ns". The allocation should contain the following values:

• ID: eap-config-xml
• URI: urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:eap-config-xml
• Filename: https://www.iana.org/assignments/xml-registry/ns/eap-config-xml.txt (to be created by IANA)
• Reference: RFCabcd (RFC editor note: replace with the RFC number of this document)

IANA is requested to register the XML schema "urn:ietf:params:xml:schema:eap-config-xml" in the "IETF XML Registry / schema". The allocation should contain the following values:

• ID: eap-config-xml
• URI: urn:ietf:params:xml:schema:eap-config-xml
• Filename: https://www.iana.org/assignments/xml-registry/schema/eap-config-xml.xsd (to be created by IANA; current XSD file is linked to in section Section 2.1)
• Reference: RFCabcd (RFC editor note: replace with the RFC number of this document)

10. Contributors

Tomasz Wolniewicz of Nicolaus Copernicus University in Torun, Poland, provided significant input into this specification.

11. References

11.1. Normative References

11.2. Informative References

Appendix A. Appendix A: MIME Type Registration Template

The following values will be used for the online MIME type registration at https://www.iana.org/form/media-types

• Your Name: Stefan Winter
• Your Email Address: stefan.winter@restena.lu
• Media Type Name: Application
• Subtype name: (Standards tree) eap-config-xml
• Required parameters: (none)
• Optional parameters: (none)
• Encoding Considerations: 8-Bit text
• Security Considerations: This file type carries configuration information for consumer devices. It has the potential to substantially alter the consumer's device; particularly to install a new trusted Certification Authority. Applications consuming files of this type need to be cautious to explain to the end user what is being altered, so that they understand the consequences. For further explanations, see Section 8 of draft-winter-opsawg-eap-metadata. (Note to RFC Editor: replace this reference with the RFC number of this document once known)
• Interoperability Considerations: The file content is XML version 1.0 or later. The encoding SHOULD be UTF-8, but implementations consuming the file SHOULD be prepared to encounter different encodings.
• Published Specification: draft-winter-opsawg-eap-metadata (Note to RFC Editor: replace this reference with the RFC number of this document once known)
• Applications which use this media type: files of this type are intended for consumption by sortware on edge devices; they consume the information therein to configure authentication parameters (EAP protocol and EAP method payload configurations) which are then applied to network or application authentication scenarios.
• Fragment Identifier Considerations: files of this type are expected to be transmitted in their entirety. If a reference to a specific part of the content is to be made, XML XPath expressions are to be used. I.e. fragment identifier formats are not expected to be used.
• Restrictions on Usage: none
• Provisional registration: initial submission of this form will be executed after adoption in the IETF; it will be a provisional registration. Final registration will be done after IESG review.
• Additional information:
  • Deprecated alias types for this name: none
  • Magic numbers: none
  • File extensions: eap-config-xml
  • Macintosh File Type Codes: TBD
  • Object Identifiers or OIDs: none

• Intended Usage: Common (no further provisions)
• Other Information/General Comment: none
• Person to contact for further information:
  • Name: Stefan Winter
  • E-Mail: stefan.winter@restena.lu
  • Author/Change controller: IETF

DATA


        

Author's Address