NVO3 Working Group | X. Min |
Internet-Draft | G. Mirsky |
Intended status: Standards Track | ZTE Corp. |
Expires: November 22, 2020 | S. Pallagatti |
VMware | |
May 21, 2020 |
Performance Measurement for Geneve
draft-xiao-nvo3-pm-geneve-01
This document describes the method to achieve Performance Measurement (PM) in point-to-point Generic Network Virtualization Encapsulation (Geneve) tunnels used to make up an overlay network.
This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79.
Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF). Note that other groups may also distribute working documents as Internet-Drafts. The list of current Internet-Drafts is at https://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/.
Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."
This Internet-Draft will expire on November 22, 2020.
Copyright (c) 2020 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the document authors. All rights reserved.
This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal Provisions Relating to IETF Documents (https://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of publication of this document. Please review these documents carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect to this document. Code Components extracted from this document must include Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as described in the Simplified BSD License.
"Generic Network Virtualization Encapsulation" (Geneve) [I-D.ietf-nvo3-geneve] provides an encapsulation scheme that allows building an overlay network by decoupling the address space of the attached virtual hosts from that of the network.
This document describes the use of Simple Two-way Active Measurement Protocol [RFC8762] to enable measuring the performance of the path between two Geneve tunnel endpoints.
Analogous to [I-D.xiao-nvo3-bfd-geneve], in this document, NVE (Network Virtualization Edge) represents the Geneve tunnel endpoint, TS (Tenant System) represents the physical or virtual device attached to a Geneve tunnel endpoint from the outside, and VAP (Virtual Access Point) represents the NVE side of the interface between the NVE and the TS.
Geneve: Generic Network Virtualization Encapsulation
NVE: Network Virtualization Edge
PM: Performance Measurement
STAMP: Simple Two-way Active Measurement Protocol
TS: Tenant System
VAP: Virtual Access Point
VNI: Virtual Network Identifier
The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT", "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "NOT RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described in BCP 14 [RFC2119] [RFC8174] when, and only when, they appear in all capitals, as shown here.
PM session is originated and terminated at VAP of an NVE, selection of the PM packet encapsulation is based on how the VAP encapsulates the data packets. This document defines two formats of PM packet encapsulation in Geneve:
If the VAP that originates the PM packets is used to encapsulate Ethernet data frames, then PM packets are encapsulated in Geneve as described below.
0 1 2 3 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | | ~ Outer Ethernet Header ~ | | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | | ~ Outer IPvX Header ~ | | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | | ~ Outer UDP Header ~ | | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | | ~ Geneve Header ~ | | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | | ~ Inner Ethernet Header ~ | | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | | ~ Inner IPvX Header ~ | | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | | ~ Inner UDP Header ~ | | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | | ~ STAMP Test Packet ~ | | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | Outer Ethernet FCS | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
Figure 1: Geneve Encapsulation of PM Packet With the Inner Ethernet/IP/UDP Header
The STAMP test packet MUST be carried inside the inner Ethernet frame of the Geneve packet, immediately after the inner IP/UDP headers. The inner Ethernet frame carrying the STAMP Test Packet has the following format: [RFC8762] and [I-D.ietf-ippm-stamp-option-tlv].
The STAMP Test Packet SHOULD be unauthenticated STAMP Session-Sender test packet or unauthenticated STAMP Session-Reflector test packet. The STAMP Test Packet is encoded as specified in
When the PM packets are encapsulated in Geneve in this way, the values in the Geneve header are set as specified in Section 3.1 of [I-D.xiao-nvo3-bfd-geneve].
If the VAP that originates the PM packets is used to encapsulate IP data packets, then PM packets are encapsulated in Geneve as described below.
0 1 2 3 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | | ~ Ethernet Header ~ | | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | | ~ Outer IPvX Header ~ | | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | | ~ Outer UDP Header ~ | | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | | ~ Geneve Header ~ | | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | | ~ Inner IPvX Header ~ | | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | | ~ Inner UDP Header ~ | | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | | ~ STAMP Test Packet ~ | | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | FCS | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
Figure 2: Geneve Encapsulation of PM Message With the Inner IP/UDP Header
A STAMP test packet MUST be carried inside the inner IP packet that immediately follows the Geneve header. The inner IP packet carrying the STAMP Test Packet has the following format: [RFC8762] and [I-D.ietf-ippm-stamp-option-tlv].
The STAMP Test Packet SHOULD be unauthenticated STAMP Session-Sender test packet or unauthenticated STAMP Session-Reflector test packet. The STAMP Test Packet is encoded as specified in
When the PM packets are encapsulated in Geneve in this way, the values in the Geneve header are set as specified in Section 3.2 of [I-D.xiao-nvo3-bfd-geneve].
Once a packet is received, the NVE MUST validate the packet as specified in Section 4 of [I-D.xiao-nvo3-bfd-geneve], except that the received STAMP test packet would be processed by STAMP Session-Sender or STAMP Session-Reflector, instead of BFD.
Analogous to BFD over Geneve, multiple PM sessions for the same VNI may be running between two NVEs, so there needs to be a mechanism for demultiplexing received PM packets to the proper session.
If the PM packet is received with STAMP Session Identifier equals to 0, the procedure for demultiplexing the received PM packets would follow the procedure for demultiplexing the received BFD packets with Your Discriminator equals to 0, which is specified in Section 4.1 of [I-D.xiao-nvo3-bfd-geneve].
If the PM packet is received with a non-zero STAMP Session Identifier, then PM session MUST be demultiplexed only with STAMP Session Identifier as the key.
This document does not raise any additional security issues beyond those of the specifications referred to in the list of normative references.
This document has no IANA action requested.
TBA.
[I-D.ietf-ippm-stamp-option-tlv] | Mirsky, G., Xiao, M., Nydell, H., Foote, R., Masputra, A. and E. Ruffini, "Simple Two-way Active Measurement Protocol Optional Extensions", Internet-Draft draft-ietf-ippm-stamp-option-tlv-04, March 2020. |
[I-D.ietf-nvo3-geneve] | Gross, J., Ganga, I. and T. Sridhar, "Geneve: Generic Network Virtualization Encapsulation", Internet-Draft draft-ietf-nvo3-geneve-16, March 2020. |
[I-D.xiao-nvo3-bfd-geneve] | Xiao, M., Mirsky, G. and J. Networks, "BFD for Geneve", Internet-Draft draft-xiao-nvo3-bfd-geneve-02, February 2020. |
[RFC2119] | Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, DOI 10.17487/RFC2119, March 1997. |
[RFC8174] | Leiba, B., "Ambiguity of Uppercase vs Lowercase in RFC 2119 Key Words", BCP 14, RFC 8174, DOI 10.17487/RFC8174, May 2017. |
[RFC8762] | Mirsky, G., Jun, G., Nydell, H. and R. Foote, "Simple Two-Way Active Measurement Protocol", RFC 8762, DOI 10.17487/RFC8762, March 2020. |