Network Working Group | X. Xu |
Internet-Draft | Huawei |
Intended status: Standards Track | S. Somasundaram |
Expires: April 15, 2016 | Alcatel-Lucent |
C. Jacquenet | |
France Telecom | |
R. Raszuk | |
Mirantis Inc. | |
October 13, 2015 |
BIER Encapsulation
draft-xu-bier-encapsulation-03
Bit Index Explicit Replication (BIER) is a new multicast forwarding paradigm which doesn't require an explicit tree-building protocol and doesn't require intermediate routers to maintain any multicast state. This document proposes a transport-independent BIER encapsulation header which is applicable in any kind of transport networks.
This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79.
Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF). Note that other groups may also distribute working documents as Internet-Drafts. The list of current Internet-Drafts is at http://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/.
Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."
This Internet-Draft will expire on April 15, 2016.
Copyright (c) 2015 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the document authors. All rights reserved.
This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal Provisions Relating to IETF Documents (http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of publication of this document. Please review these documents carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect to this document. Code Components extracted from this document must include Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as described in the Simplified BSD License.
Bit Index Explicit Replication (BIER) [I-D.ietf-bier-architecture] is a new multicast forwarding paradigm which doesn't require an explicit tree-building protocol and doesn't require intermediate routers to maintain any multicast state. As described in [I-D.ietf-bier-architecture], BIER requires that a multicast data packet (e.g., an IP packet or an MPLS packet) to be encapsulated with a BIER header that carries the information needed for supporting the BIER forwarding procedures. This information at least includes Subdomain-ID, Set-Identifier (SI), Multi-Topology Identifier (MT-ID) and BitString. Subdomain-ID, SI and BitString are used together to identify the set of egress BFRs (BFERs) to which the packet must be delivered. In addition, to indicate what type of payload is following the BIER header, a protocol type field is neccessary. This document proposes a transport-independent BIER encapsulation header which is applicable in any kind of transport networks.
The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT", "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described in RFC 2119 [RFC2119].
This memo makes use of the terms defined in [I-D.ietf-bier-architecture].
The BIER header is shown as follows:
0 1 2 3 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | Ver | BS Length |Res| SI | MT-ID | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | BFIR-ID | Sub-domain | Protocol | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | Entropy | DS | TTL | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | BitString (first 32 bits) ~ +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ ~ ~ +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ ~ BitString (last 32 bits) | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
Since the BIER encapsulation format as specified in Section 3 is transport-independent, it can be encapsulated with any type of transport encapsulation headers, such as Ethernet header, PPP header, IP header, MPLS header, GRE header, UDP header etc. It requires for each possible transport encapsulation header to be able to indicate the payload is an BIER header. For instance, In the BIER-in-MAC encapsulation case, the EtherType field in the Ethernet header is used. In the BIER-in-IP encapsulation case, the Protocol field in the IPv4 or or the Next-Header field in the IPv6 header is used. In the BIER-in-MPLS encapsulation case, either the Protocol Type field [I-D.xu-mpls-payload-protocol-identifier] within the MPLS packet or a to-be-assigned Extended Special Purpose label [RFC7274] is used.
TBD.
This document includes a request to IANA to allocate an EtherType code,a PPP protocol code, an IPv4 protocol code (i.e., an IPv6 Next-Header code), a UDP destination port for carring the BIER-encapsulated packet over the corresponding transport networks. Furthermore, This document includes a request to IANA to allocate IP Protocol numbers for VXLAN and VXLAN-GPE respectively.
TBD.
[ETYPES] | The IEEE Registration Authority, "IEEE 802 Numbers", 2012. |
[I-D.ietf-bier-architecture] | Wijnands, I., Rosen, E., Dolganow, A., Przygienda, T. and S. Aldrin, "Multicast using Bit Index Explicit Replication", Internet-Draft draft-ietf-bier-architecture-02, July 2015. |
[I-D.xu-mpls-payload-protocol-identifier] | Xu, X. and M. Chen, "MPLS Payload Protocol Identifier", Internet-Draft draft-xu-mpls-payload-protocol-identifier-00, September 2013. |
[RFC2119] | Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, DOI 10.17487/RFC2119, March 1997. |
[RFC7274] | Kompella, K., Andersson, L. and A. Farrel, "Allocating and Retiring Special-Purpose MPLS Labels", RFC 7274, DOI 10.17487/RFC7274, June 2014. |