Network Working Group | X. Xu, Ed. |
Internet-Draft | Huawei |
Intended status: Standards Track | S. Somasundaram |
Expires: January 2, 2017 | Alcatel-Lucent |
C. Jacquenet, Ed. | |
France Telecom | |
R. Raszuk | |
Bloomberg LP | |
July 1, 2016 |
A Transport-Independent Bit Index Explicit Replication (BIER) Encapsulation Header
draft-xu-bier-encapsulation-05
Bit Index Explicit Replication (BIER) is a new multicast forwarding paradigm which doesn't require an explicit tree-building protocol nor intermediate routers to maintain any multicast state. This document proposes a transport-independent BIER encapsulation header which is applicable regardless of the underlying transport technology.
This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79.
Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF). Note that other groups may also distribute working documents as Internet-Drafts. The list of current Internet-Drafts is at http://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/.
Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."
This Internet-Draft will expire on January 2, 2017.
Copyright (c) 2016 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the document authors. All rights reserved.
This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal Provisions Relating to IETF Documents (http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of publication of this document. Please review these documents carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect to this document. Code Components extracted from this document must include Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as described in the Simplified BSD License.
Bit Index Explicit Replication (BIER) [I-D.ietf-bier-architecture] is a new multicast forwarding paradigm which doesn't require an explicit tree-building protocol nor intermediate routers to maintain any multicast state. As described in [I-D.ietf-bier-architecture], BIER adds a header to a multicast data packet (e.g., an IP packet or an MPLS packet). The BIER header carries the information needed for supporting the BIER forwarding procedures. This information at least includes Subdomain-ID, Set-Identifier (SI) and BitString. Subdomain-ID, SI and BitString are used together to identify the set of Bit-Forwarding Egress Routers (BFERs) to which the packet must be delivered. In addition, a Protocol Type field is neccessary to indicate what type of payload is following the BIER header. This document proposes a transport-independent BIER encapsulation header which is applicable regardless of the underlying transport technology.
The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT", "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described in RFC 2119 [RFC2119].
This memo makes use of the terms defined in [I-D.ietf-bier-architecture].
The BIER header is shown in Figure 1.
0 1 2 3 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | Ver | BSL | Reserved | SI | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | BFIR-ID | Sub-domain | Protocol | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | Entropy | DS | TTL | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | BitString (first 32 bits) ~ +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ ~ ~ +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ ~ BitString (last 32 bits) | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ Figure 1: BIER Header Format.
Since the BIER header format as specified in Section 3 is transport-independent by design, it can be carried with any type of transport encapsulation headers, such as an Ethernet header, a PPP header, an IP header, an MPLS header, a GRE header, an UDP header etc. Any possible transport encapsulation header must be able to indicate the payload is an BIER header. For instance, in the BIER-in-MAC encapsulation case, the EtherType [ETYPES] field of the Ethernet header is used for that purpose. In the BIER-in-IP encapsulation case, the Protocol field of the IPv4 header or or the Next-Header field of the IPv6 header are used. In the BIER-in-MPLS encapsulation case, either the Protocol Type field [I-D.xu-mpls-payload-protocol-identifier] within the MPLS packet or a yet-to-be-assigned Extended Special Purpose label [RFC7274] can be used.
Thanks Antoni Przygienda and IJsbrand Wijnands for their valuable comments and suggestions on this document.
This document includes a request to IANA to allocate an EtherType code,a PPP protocol code, an IPv4 protocol code, an IPv6 Next-Header code, a UDP destination port to indicate that BIER-encapsulated data follows. Furthermore, this document includes a request to IANA to allocate IP Protocol numbers for VXLAN and VXLAN-GPE respectively.
As mentioned in [I-D.ietf-bier-architecture], when BIER is paired with any transport underlay, it inherits the security considerations of the corresponding transport layer. Also, SI and BFIR-ID fields of the BIER header may carry values other than those intended by the BFIR at the risk of misdelivering the packet. Means to protect BFR routers against Man-in-the-Middle and Denial of Service attacks must be provided.
[ETYPES] | The IEEE Registration Authority, "IEEE 802 Numbers", 2012. |
[I-D.ietf-bier-architecture] | Wijnands, I., Rosen, E., Dolganow, A., Przygienda, T. and S. Aldrin, "Multicast using Bit Index Explicit Replication", Internet-Draft draft-ietf-bier-architecture-03, January 2016. |
[RFC2119] | Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, DOI 10.17487/RFC2119, March 1997. |