Network Working Group | X. Xu |
Internet-Draft | Huawei |
Intended status: Standards Track | K. Patel |
Expires: August 20, 2015 | Cisco |
M. Chen | |
Huawei | |
I. Wijnands | |
Cisco | |
February 16, 2015 |
BGP Extensions for BIER
draft-xu-idr-bier-extensions-00
Bit Index Explicit Replication (BIER) is a new multicast forwarding architecture which doesn't require an explicit tree-building protocol and doesn't require intermediate routers to maintain any multicast state. BIER is applicable in a multi-tenant data center network envioronment for efficient delivery of Broadcast, Unknown-unicast and Multicast (BUM) traffic while eliminating the need for maitaining a huge amount of multicast state in an underlay. This document describes BGP extensions for advertising the BIER-specific information. These extesnions are applicable in those multi-tenant data centers where BGP instead of IGP is deployed as an underlay for network reachability advertisement. These extensions may also be applicable in other scenarios.
This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79.
Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF). Note that other groups may also distribute working documents as Internet-Drafts. The list of current Internet-Drafts is at http://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/.
Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."
This Internet-Draft will expire on August 20, 2015.
Copyright (c) 2015 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the document authors. All rights reserved.
This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal Provisions Relating to IETF Documents (http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of publication of this document. Please review these documents carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect to this document. Code Components extracted from this document must include Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as described in the Simplified BSD License.
Bit Index Explicit Replication (BIER) [I-D.wijnands-bier-architecture] is a new multicast forwarding architecture which doesn't require an explicit tree-building protocol and doesn't require intermediate routers to maintain any multicast state. BIER is applicable in a multi-tenant data center network envioronment for efficient delivery of Broadcast, Unknown-unicast and Multicast (BUM) traffic while eliminating the need for maitaining a huge amount of multicast state in an underlay[I-D.kumar-bier-use-cases]. This document describes BGP extensions for advertising the BIER-specific information. More specifically, in this document, we define a new optional, non-transitive BGP attribute, referred to as the BIER attribute, to convey the BIER-specific information such as BFR-ID, bitstring length and so on. In addition, this document specifies procedures to prevent the BIER attribute from "leaking out" of a BIER domain . These extensions are applicable in those multi-tenant data centers where BGP instead of IGP is used as an underlay [I-D.ietf-rtgwg-bgp-routing-large-dc]. These extensions may also be applicable to other BGP based network scenarios.
The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT", "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described in RFC 2119 [RFC2119].
This memo makes use of the terms defined in [RFC4271].
This draft defines a new optional, transitive BGP path attribute, referred to as the BIER attribute. This attribute can be attached to a BGP UPDATE message by the originator so as to indicate the BIER-specific information of a particular BFR which is identified by the /32 or /128 address prefix contained in the NLRI.
The attribute type code for the BIER Attribute is TBD. The value field of the BIER Attribute is defined here to contain a set of TLVs. Each such TLV is encoded as shown in Figure 1.
0 1 2 3 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | Type | Length | | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | ~ ~ | Value | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+.......................... Figure 1:BIER TLV
[I-D.wijnands-mpls-bier-encapsulation]. Other TLVs are to be defined in the future.
This document defines three such TLVs including "BFR-ID TLV" , "BSL TLV" and "MPLS BIER Encapsulation TLV". The first one is used to convey the BFR-ID of the BFR which is indicated by the NLRI. The second one is used to indicate the BitString Length that the BFR which is indicated by the NLRI can support. The third one is used to indicate the MPLS label range available for the MPLS-BIER encapsulation purpose
The BFR-ID TLV is encoded as follows:
The BSL TLV is encoded as follows:
The BIER MPLS Encapsualtion TLV is encoded as follows:
An implementation that supports the BIER attribute MUST support a policy to enable or disable the creation of the BIER attribute and its attachment to specific BGP routes. An implementation MAY disable the creation of the BIER attribute unless explicitly configured to do so otherwise. A BGP speaker MUST only attach the locally created BIER attribute to a BGP UPDATE message in which one of its local addresses (e.g., a loopback address) is contained in the NLRI.
An implementation that supports the BIER attribute MUST support a per-EBGP-session policy, that indicates whether the attribute is enabled or disabled for use on that session. The BIER attribute MUST NOT be sent on any EBGP peers for which the session policy is not configured. If an BIER attribute is received on a BGP session for which session policy is not configured, then the received attribute MUST be treated exactly as if it were an unrecognized non-transitive attribute. That is, "it MUST be quietly ignored and not passed along to other BGP peers".
To prevent the BIER attribute from "leaking out" of an BIER domain, each BGP router on the BIER domain MUST support an outbound route announcement policy.Such a policy MUST be disabled on each EBGP session by default unless explicitly configured.
TBD.
IANA is requested to assign a codepoint in the "BGP Path Attributes" registry to the BIER attribute. IANA shall create a registry for "BGP BIER Attribute Types". The type field consists of a single octet, with possible values from 1 to 255. (The value 0 is "reserved".) The allocation policy for this field is to be "Standards Action". Type codes should be allocated for BFR-ID TLV, BSL TLV and BIER MPLS Encapsualtion TLV respectively.
TBD.
[I-D.wijnands-bier-architecture] | Wijnands, I., Rosen, E., Dolganow, A., Przygienda, T. and S. Aldrin, "Multicast using Bit Index Explicit Replication", Internet-Draft draft-wijnands-bier-architecture-04, February 2015. |
[I-D.wijnands-mpls-bier-encapsulation] | Wijnands, I., Rosen, E., Dolganow, A., Tantsura, J. and S. Aldrin, "Encapsulation for Bit Index Explicit Replication in MPLS Networks", Internet-Draft draft-wijnands-mpls-bier-encapsulation-02, December 2014. |
[RFC2119] | Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, March 1997. |
[RFC4271] | Rekhter, Y., Li, T. and S. Hares, "A Border Gateway Protocol 4 (BGP-4)", RFC 4271, January 2006. |
[I-D.ietf-rtgwg-bgp-routing-large-dc] | Lapukhov, P., Premji, A. and J. Mitchell, "Use of BGP for routing in large-scale data centers", Internet-Draft draft-ietf-rtgwg-bgp-routing-large-dc-01, February 2015. |
[I-D.kumar-bier-use-cases] | Kumar, N., Asati, R., Chen, M., Xu, X., Dolganow, A., Przygienda, T., arkadiy.gulko@thomsonreuters.com, a. and D. Robinson, "BIER Use Cases", Internet-Draft draft-kumar-bier-use-cases-02, February 2015. |