| |
|
| |
| | Improving the Robustness of Stateless Address Autoconfiguration (SLAAC) to Flash Renumbering Events |
| |
|
In scenarios where network configuration information becomes invalid without explicit notification to the local network, local hosts may end up employing stale information for an unacceptably long period of time, thus resulting in interoperability problems. This document improves the reaction of IPv6 Stateless Address Autoconfiguration to such configuration changes. It formally updates RFC 4191, RFC 4861, RFC 4862, and RFC 8106. |
| | Limits on Sending and Processing IPv6 Extension Headers |
| |
|
This document defines various limits that may be applied to receiving, sending, and otherwise processing packets that contain IPv6 extension headers. Limits are pragmatic to facilitate interoperability amongst hosts and routers, thereby increasing the deployability of extension headers. The limits described herein establish the minimum baseline of support for use of extension headers on the Internet. If it is known that all communicating parties for a particular communication, including destination hosts and any routers in the path, are capable of supporting more than the baseline then these default limits may be freely exceeded. |
| | Carrying Network Resource (NR) related Information in IPv6 Extension Header |
| |
|
Virtual Private Networks (VPNs) provide different customers with logically separated connectivity over a common network infrastructure. With the introduction of 5G and also in some existing network scenarios, some customers may require network connectivity services with advanced features comparing to conventional VPN services. Such kind of network service is called enhanced VPNs. Enhanced VPNs can be used, for example, to deliver network slice services. A Network Resource Partition (NRP) is a subset of the network resources and associated policies on each of a connected set of links in the underlay network. An NRP may be used as the underlay to support one or a group of enhanced VPN services. For packet forwarding within a specific NRP, some fields in the data packet are used to identify the NRP to which the packet belongs. In doing so, NRP-specific processing can be performed on each node along a path in the NRP. This document specifies a new IPv6 Hop-by-Hop option to carry network resource related information (e.g., identifier) in data packets. The NR Option can also be generalized for other network resource semantics and functions. |
| | IPv6 Query for Enabled In-situ OAM Capabilities |
| |
|
This document describes the application of the mechanism of discovering In-situ OAM (IOAM) capabilities, described in RFC 9359 "Echo Request/Reply for Enabled In Situ OAM (IOAM) Capabilities", in IPv6 networks. IPv6 Node IOAM Request uses the IPv6 Node Information messages, allowing the IOAM encapsulating node to discover the enabled IOAM capabilities of each IOAM transit and IOAM decapsulating node. This document updates RFCs 4620 and 4884. |
| | Architecture and Framework for IPv6 over Non-Broadcast Access |
| |
|
This document presents an architecture and framework for IPv6 access networks that decouples the network-layer concepts of Links, Interface, and Subnets from the link-layer concepts of links, ports, and broadcast domains, and limits the reliance on link-layer broadcasts. This architecture is suitable for IPv6 over any network, including non-broadcast networks, which is typically the case for intangible media such as wireless and virtual networks such as overlays. A study of the issues with IPv6 ND over intangible media is presented, and a framework to solve those issues within the new architecture is proposed. |
| | Prioritizing known-local IPv6 ULAs through address selection policy |
| |
|
This document draws on several years of operational experience to update RFC 6724, defining the concept of "known-local" ULA prefixes that enable ULA-to-ULA communications within fd00::/8 to become preferred over both IPv4-IPv4 and GUA-to-GUA for local use. The document defines the means by which nodes can both identify and insert such prefixes into their address selection policy table. It also clarifies the mandatory, unconditional requirement for support for Rule 5.5 and demotes the preference for 6to4 addresses. These changes to default behavior improve supportability of common use cases, including automatic / unmanaged scenarios, and makes preference for IPv6 over IPv4 consistent in local site networks for both ULA and GUA prefixes. It is recognized that some less common deployment scenarios may require explicit configuration or custom changes to achieve desired operational parameters. |
| | Signaling DHCPv6 Prefix per Client Availability to Hosts |
| |
|
This document defines a "P" flag in the Prefix Information Option (PIO) of IPv6 Router Advertisements (RAs). The flag is used to indicate that the network prefers that clients use the RFC9663 deployment model instead of using individual adresses in the on-link prefix assigned using Stateless Address Autoconfiguration (SLAAC) or DHCPv6 address assignment. This document updates RFC4862 to indicate that the Autonomous flag in a PIO needs to be ignored if the PIO has the P flag set. It also updates RFC4861 to specify that the P flag indicates DHCPv6 Prefix Delegation support for clients. |
| | Entering IPv6 Zone Identifiers in User Interfaces |
| |
|
This document describes how the zone identifier of an IPv6 scoped address, defined in the IPv6 Scoped Address Architecture (RFC 4007), should be entered into a user interface. It obsoletes RFC 6874 and updates RFC 4007, RFC 7622 and RFC 8089. Discussion Venue This note is to be removed before publishing as an RFC. Discussion of this document takes place on the 6MAN mailing list (ipv6@ietf.org), which is archived at https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipv6/ (https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipv6/). |
| | Deprecation Of The IPv6 Router Alert Option |
| |
|
This document deprecates the IPv6 Router Alert Option. Protocols that use the Router Alert Option may continue to do so, even in future versions. However, protocols that are standardized in the future must not use the Router Alert Option. This document obsoletes RFC 2711. |
| | SNAC Router Flag in ICMPv6 Router Advertisement Messages |
| |
|
This document defines a new flag, the SNAC Router flag, in the Router Advertisement message that can be used to distinguish configuration information sent by SNAC routers from information sent by infrastructure routers. This flag is used only by SNAC routers and is ignored by all other devices. |
| | IPv6 Node Requirements |
| |
|
This document defines requirements for IPv6 nodes. It is expected that IPv6 will be deployed in a wide range of devices and situations. Specifying the requirements for IPv6 nodes allows IPv6 to function well and interoperate in a large number of situations and deployments. This document obsoletes RFC 8504, and in turn RFC 6434 and its predecessor, RFC 4294. |
| | Clarification of IPv6 Address Assignment Policy |
| |
|
This document specifies the approval process for changes to the IPv6 Address Space registry. It also updates RFC 7249. About This Document This note is to be removed before publishing as an RFC. Status information for this document may be found at https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-6man-addr-assign/. Discussion of this document takes place on the 6MAN Working Group mailing list (mailto:ipv6@ietf.org), which is archived at https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipv6/. Subscribe at https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6/. |
| | The IPv6 VPN Service Destination Option |
| |
|
This document describes an experiment in which VPN service information for both layer 2 and layer 3 VPNs is encoded in a new IPv6 Destination Option. The new IPv6 Destination Option is called the VPN Service Option. One purpose of this experiment is to demonstrate that the VPN Service Option can be implemented and deployed in a production network. Another purpose is to demonstrate that the security considerations, described in this document, have been sufficiently addressed. Finally, this document encourages replication of the experiment. |