Bidirectional Forwarding Detection (bfd)
| WG | Name | Bidirectional Forwarding Detection | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Acronym | bfd | ||
| Area | Routing Area (rtg) | ||
| State | Active | ||
| Charter | charter-ietf-bfd-09 Approved | ||
| Status update | Show Changed 2019-03-19 | ||
| Document dependencies | |||
| Additional resources |
Issue tracker,
Working group wiki Zulip Stream |
||
| Personnel | Chairs | Jeffrey Haas, Reshad Rahman | |
| Area Director | John Scudder | ||
| Tech Advisors | Dave Katz, David Ward | ||
| Mailing list | Address | rtg-bfd@ietf.org | |
| To subscribe | https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtg-bfd | ||
| Archive | https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rtg-bfd/ | ||
| Chat | Room address | https://zulip.ietf.org/#narrow/stream/bfd |
Charter for Working Group
The BFD Working Group is chartered to standardize and support the
bidirectional forwarding detection protocol (BFD) and its extensions. A
core goal of the working group is to standardize BFD in the context of
IP routing, or protocols such as MPLS that are based on IP routing, in a
way that will encourage multiple, inter-operable vendor implementations.
The Working Group will also provide advice and guidance on BFD to other
working groups or standards bodies as requested.
BFD is a protocol intended to detect faults in the bidirectional path
between two forwarding engines, including physical interfaces,
subinterfaces, data link(s), and to the extent possible the forwarding
engines themselves, with potentially very low latency. It operates
independently of media, data protocols, and routing protocols. An
additional goal is to provide a single mechanism that can be used for
liveness detection over any media, at any protocol layer, with
a wide range of detection times and overhead, to avoid a proliferation
of different methods.
Important characteristics of BFD include:
-
Simple, fixed-field encoding to facilitate implementations in
hardware. -
Independence of the data protocol being forwarded between two systems.
BFD packets are carried as the payload of whatever encapsulating
protocol is appropriate for the medium and network. -
Path independence: BFD can provide failure detection on any kind of
path between systems, including direct physical links, virtual
circuits, tunnels, MPLS LSPs, multihop routed paths, and
unidirectional links (so long as there is some return path, of
course). -
Ability to be bootstrapped by any other protocol that automatically
forms peer, neighbor or adjacency relationships to seed BFD endpoint
discovery.
The working group is currently chartered to complete the following work items:
-
Define a mechanism to perform single-ended path (i.e. continuity)
verification based on the BFD specification. Allow such a mechanism to
work both proactively and on-demand, without prominent initial delay.
Allow the mechanism to maintain multiple sessions to a target entity and
between the same pair of network entities. In doing this work, the WG
will work closely with at least the following other WGs: ISIS, OSPF,
SPRING. -
Extend BFD to allow it to detect whether a path between two systems
is capable of carrying a payload of a particular size. -
Define a use of the BFD Echo where the local system supports BFD but
the adjacent system does not support BFD. -
Provide an optimization to BFD authentication to reduce computational
demand while still providing desirable security properties. -
Provide a Meticulous Keyed mode for BFD authentication.
-
Define experimental extensions to measure BFD stability.
The working group will maintain a relationship with the MPLS working group.
Milestones
| Date | Milestone | Associated documents |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 2025 | Define experimental extensions to measure BFD stability. |
draft-ietf-bfd-stability
|
| Jun 2025 | Provide a Meticulous Keyed mode for BFD authentication. |
draft-ietf-bfd-secure-sequence-numbers
|
| Jun 2025 | Provide an optimization to BFD authentication to reduce computational demand while still providing desirable security properties. |
draft-ietf-bfd-optimizing-authentication
|
| Dec 2024 | Define a use of the BFD Echo where the local system supports BFD but the adjacent system does not support BFD. |
draft-ietf-bfd-unaffiliated-echo
|
| Dec 2024 | Extend BFD to allow it to detect whether a path between two systems is capable of carrying a payload of a particular size. |
draft-ietf-bfd-large-packets
|