Internet DRAFT - draft-azimov-sidrops-aspa-profile
draft-azimov-sidrops-aspa-profile
Network Working Group A. Azimov
Internet-Draft E. Uskov
Intended status: Standards Track Qrator Labs
Expires: July 10, 2019 R. Bush
Internet Initiative Japan
K. Patel
Arrcus
J. Snijders
NTT
R. Housley
Vigil Security
January 6, 2019
A Profile for Autonomous System Provider Authorization
draft-azimov-sidrops-aspa-profile-01
Abstract
This document defines a standard profile for Autonomous System
Provider Authorization in the Resource Public Key Infrastructure. An
Autonomous System Provider Authorization is a digitally signed object
that provides a means of verifying that a Customer Autonomous System
holder has authorized a Provider Autonomous System to be its upstream
provider and for the Provider to send prefixes received from the
Customer Autonomous System in all directions including providers and
peers.
Requirements Language
The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT",
"SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "NOT RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and
"OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described in BCP
14 [RFC2119] [RFC8174] when, and only when, they appear in all
capitals, as shown here.
Status of This Memo
This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the
provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79.
Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering
Task Force (IETF). Note that other groups may also distribute
working documents as Internet-Drafts. The list of current Internet-
Drafts is at https://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/.
Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months
and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any
Azimov, et al. Expires July 10, 2019 [Page 1]
Internet-Draft ASPA Profile January 2019
time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference
material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."
This Internet-Draft will expire on July 10, 2019.
Copyright Notice
Copyright (c) 2019 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the
document authors. All rights reserved.
This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal
Provisions Relating to IETF Documents
(https://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of
publication of this document. Please review these documents
carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect
to this document. Code Components extracted from this document must
include Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of
the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as
described in the Simplified BSD License.
Table of Contents
1. Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
2. The ASPA Content Type . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
3. The ASPA eContent . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
3.1. version . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
3.2. AFI . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
3.3. customerASID . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
3.4. providerASID . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
4. ASPA Validation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
5. ASN.1 Module for the ASPA Content Type . . . . . . . . . . . 5
6. IANA Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
7. Security Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
8. Acknowledgments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
9. References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
9.1. Normative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
9.2. Informative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
Authors' Addresses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
1. Introduction
The primary purpose of the Resource Public Key Infrastructure (RPKI)
is to improve routing security. (See [RFC6480] for more
information.) As part of this infrastructure, a mechanism is needed
to verify that a Provider AS (PAS) has permission from a Customer AS
(CAS) holder to send routes in all directions. The digitally signed
Autonomous System Provider Authorization (ASPA) object provides this
verification mechanism.
Azimov, et al. Expires July 10, 2019 [Page 2]
Internet-Draft ASPA Profile January 2019
The ASPA uses the template for RPKI digitally signed objects
[RFC6488], which defines a Cryptographic Message Syntax (CMS)
[RFC5652] wrapper for the ASPA content as well as a generic
validation procedure for RPKI signed objects. As ASPAs need to be
validated with RPKI certificates issued by the current
infrastructure, we assume the mandatory-to-implement algorithms in
[RFC6485], or its successor.
To complete the specification of the ASPA (see Section 4 of
[RFC6488]), this document defines:
1. The object identifier (OID) that identifies the ASPA signed
object. This OID appears in the eContentType field of the
encapContentInfo object as well as the content-type signed
attribute within the signerInfo structure).
2. The ASN.1 syntax for the ASPA content, which is the payload
signed by the CAS. The ASPA content is encoded using the ASN.1
[X680] Distinguished Encoding Rules (DER) [X690].
3. The steps required to validate an ASPA beyond the validation
steps specified in [RFC6488]).
2. The ASPA Content Type
The content-type for an ASPA is defined as id-cct-ASPA, which has the
numerical value of 1.2.840.113549.1.9.16.1.TBD. This OID MUST appear
both within the eContentType in the encapContentInfo structure as
well as the content-type signed attribute within the signerInfo
structure (see [RFC6488]).
3. The ASPA eContent
The content of an ASPA identifies the Customer AS (CAS) as well as
the Provider AS (PAS) that is authorized to further propagate
announcements received from the customer. If customer has multiple
providers, it issues multiple ASPAs, one for each provider AS. An
ASPA is formally defined as:
Azimov, et al. Expires July 10, 2019 [Page 3]
Internet-Draft ASPA Profile January 2019
ct-ASPA CONTENT-TYPE ::=
{ ASProviderAttestation IDENTIFIED BY id-ct-ASPA }
id-ct-ASPA OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= { id-ct TBD }
ASProviderAttestation ::= SEQUENCE {
version [0] ASPAVersion DEFAULT v0,
AFI AddressFamilyIdentifier,
customerASID ASID,
providerASID ASID }
ASPAVersion ::= INTEGER { v0(0) }
AddressFamilyIdentifier ::= INTEGER
ASID ::= INTEGER
Note that this content appears as the eContent within the
encapContentInfo as specified in [RFC6488].
3.1. version
The version number of the ASProviderAttestation MUST be v0.
3.2. AFI
The AFI field contains Address Family Identifier for which the
relation between customer and provider ASes is authorized. Presently
defined values for the Address Family Identifier field are specified
in the IANA's Address Family Numbers registry [IANA-AF].
3.3. customerASID
The customerASID field contains the AS number of the Autonomous
System that authorizes an upstream provider (listed in the
providerASId) to propagate prefixes in the specified address family
other ASes.
3.4. providerASID
The providerASID contains the AS number that is authorized to further
propagate announcements in the specified address family received from
the customer.
Azimov, et al. Expires July 10, 2019 [Page 4]
Internet-Draft ASPA Profile January 2019
4. ASPA Validation
Before a relying party can use an ASPA to validate a routing
announcement, the relying party MUST first validate the ASPA object
itself. To validate an ASPA, the relying party MUST perform all the
validation checks specified in [RFC6488] as well as the following
additional ASPA-specific validation step.
o The autonomous system identifier delegation extension [RFC3779] is
present in the end-entity (EE) certificate (contained within the
ASPA), and the customer AS number in the ASPA is contained within
the set of AS numbers specified by the EE certificate's autonomous
system identifier delegation extension.
5. ASN.1 Module for the ASPA Content Type
Azimov, et al. Expires July 10, 2019 [Page 5]
Internet-Draft ASPA Profile January 2019
RPKI-ASPA-2018
{ iso(1) member-body(2) us(840) rsadsi(113549) pkcs(1)
pkcs-9(9) smime(16) modules(0) id-mod-rpki-aspa-2018(TBD2) }
DEFINITIONS IMPLICIT TAGS ::=
BEGIN
IMPORTS
CONTENT-TYPE
FROM CryptographicMessageSyntax-2010 -- RFC 6268
{ iso(1) member-body(2) us(840) rsadsi(113549) pkcs(1)
pkcs-9(9) smime(16) modules(0) id-mod-cms-2009(58) } ;
ContentSet CONTENT-TYPE ::= { ct-ASPA, ... }
--
-- ASPA Content Type
--
id-smime OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= { iso(1) member-body(2)
us(840) rsadsi(113549) pkcs(1) pkcs-9(9) 16 }
id-ct OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= { id-smime 1 }
id-ct-ASPA OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= { id-ct TBD }
ct-ASPA CONTENT-TYPE ::=
{ TYPE ASProviderAttestation IDENTIFIED BY id-ct-ASPA }
ASProviderAttestation ::= SEQUENCE {
version [0] ASPAVersion DEFAULT v0,
AFI AddressFamilyIdentifier,
customerASID ASID,
providerASID ASID }
ASPAVersion ::= INTEGER { v0(0) }
AddressFamilyIdentifier ::= INTEGER
ASID ::= INTEGER
END
6. IANA Considerations
Please add the id-mod-rpki-aspa-2018 to the SMI Security for S/MIME
Module Identifier (1.2.840.113549.1.9.16.0) registry
(https://www.iana.org/assignments/smi-numbers/smi-
numbers.xml#security-smime-0) as follows:
Azimov, et al. Expires July 10, 2019 [Page 6]
Internet-Draft ASPA Profile January 2019
Decimal | Description | Specification
-----------------------------------------------------------
TBD2 | id-mod-rpki-aspa-2018 | [ThisRFC]
Please add the ASPA to the SMI Security for S/MIME CMS Content Type
(1.2.840.113549.1.9.16.1) registry (https://www.iana.org/assignments/
smi-numbers/smi-numbers.xml#security-smime-1) as follows:
Decimal | Description | Specification
-----------------------------------------------------------
TBD | id-ct-ASPA | [ThisRFC]
Please add the ASPA to the RPKI Signed Object registry
(https://www.iana.org/assignments/rpki/rpki.xhtml#signed-objects) as
follows:
Name | OID | Specification
-----------------------------------------------------------
ASPA | 1.2.840.113549.1.9.16.1.TBD | [ThisRFC]
7. Security Considerations
8. Acknowledgments
9. References
9.1. Normative References
[IANA-AF] IANA, "Address Family Numbers",
<http://www.iana.org/numbers.html>.
[RFC2119] Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate
Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119,
DOI 10.17487/RFC2119, March 1997,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc2119>.
[RFC3779] Lynn, C., Kent, S., and K. Seo, "X.509 Extensions for IP
Addresses and AS Identifiers", RFC 3779,
DOI 10.17487/RFC3779, June 2004,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc3779>.
[RFC5652] Housley, R., "Cryptographic Message Syntax (CMS)", STD 70,
RFC 5652, DOI 10.17487/RFC5652, September 2009,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc5652>.
Azimov, et al. Expires July 10, 2019 [Page 7]
Internet-Draft ASPA Profile January 2019
[RFC6485] Huston, G., "The Profile for Algorithms and Key Sizes for
Use in the Resource Public Key Infrastructure (RPKI)",
RFC 6485, DOI 10.17487/RFC6485, February 2012,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc6485>.
[RFC6488] Lepinski, M., Chi, A., and S. Kent, "Signed Object
Template for the Resource Public Key Infrastructure
(RPKI)", RFC 6488, DOI 10.17487/RFC6488, February 2012,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc6488>.
[RFC8174] Leiba, B., "Ambiguity of Uppercase vs Lowercase in RFC
2119 Key Words", BCP 14, RFC 8174, DOI 10.17487/RFC8174,
May 2017, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8174>.
[X680] ITU-T, "Information technology -- Abstract Syntax Notation
One (ASN.1): Specification of basic notation",
ITU-T Recommendation X.680, 2015.
[X690] ITU-T, "Information Technology -- ASN.1 encoding rules:
Specification of Basic Encoding Rules (BER), Canonical
Encoding Rules (CER) and Distinguished Encoding Rules
(DER)", ITU-T Recommendation X.690, 2015.
9.2. Informative References
[RFC6480] Lepinski, M. and S. Kent, "An Infrastructure to Support
Secure Internet Routing", RFC 6480, DOI 10.17487/RFC6480,
February 2012, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc6480>.
Authors' Addresses
Alexander Azimov
Qrator Labs
Email: a.e.azimov@gmail.com
Eugene Uskov
Qrator Labs
Email: eu@qrator.net
Randy Bush
Internet Initiative Japan
Email: randy@psg.com
Azimov, et al. Expires July 10, 2019 [Page 8]
Internet-Draft ASPA Profile January 2019
Keyur Patel
Arrcus, Inc.
Email: keyur@arrcus.com
Job Snijders
NTT Communications
Theodorus Majofskistraat 100
Amsterdam 1065 SZ
The Netherlands
Email: job@ntt.net
Russ Housley
Vigil Security, LLC
918 Spring Knoll Drive
Herndon, VA 20170
USA
Email: housley@vigilsec.com
Azimov, et al. Expires July 10, 2019 [Page 9]
