Internet DRAFT - draft-bi-supa-sdsavi
draft-bi-supa-sdsavi
Network J. Bi
Internet-Draft G. Yao
Intended status: Standards Track Tsinghua Univ.
Expires: March 30, 2015 September 26, 2014
A SUPA Use Case for SAVI
draft-bi-supa-sdsavi-00
Abstract
This document is about the SUPA use case for SAVI.
Status of This Memo
This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the
provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79.
Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering
Task Force (IETF). Note that other groups may also distribute
working documents as Internet-Drafts. The list of current Internet-
Drafts is at http://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/.
Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months
and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any
time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference
material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."
This Internet-Draft will expire on March 30, 2015.
Copyright Notice
Copyright (c) 2014 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the
document authors. All rights reserved.
This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal
Provisions Relating to IETF Documents
(http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of
publication of this document. Please review these documents
carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect
to this document. Code Components extracted from this document must
include Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of
the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as
described in the Simplified BSD License.
This document may contain material from IETF Documents or IETF
Contributions published or made publicly available before November
10, 2008. The person(s) controlling the copyright in some of this
Bi & Yao Expires March 30, 2015 [Page 1]
Internet-Draft A SUPA Use Case for SAVI September 2014
material may not have granted the IETF Trust the right to allow
modifications of such material outside the IETF Standards Process.
Without obtaining an adequate license from the person(s) controlling
the copyright in such materials, this document may not be modified
outside the IETF Standards Process, and derivative works of it may
not be created outside the IETF Standards Process, except to format
it for publication as an RFC or to translate it into languages other
than English.
Table of Contents
1. Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
2. Terminology . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
3. SUPA Use Case for SAVI . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
3.1. Element View Collection . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
3.2. Configuration Generation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
3.3. Binding and Filtering Generation Process . . . . . . . . 3
4. Normative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
1. Introduction
To validate the source address of local traffic can greatly improve
the security and traceability of the network. The IETF Source
Address Validation Improvements working group has standardized a
number of finer-granularity source address validation solutions,
i.e., FCFS-SAVI, DHCP-SAVI, SEND-SAVI. However, due to the
considerations on simplify in implementation and deployment, the
solutions only cover the basic scenarios. Whenever these solutions
are enforced in scenarios with new source address usage related
elements, for example, Mobile IP, these solutions may behavior
improperly. In real deployment of SAVI solutions, the operators have
to take such elements into account and evaluate whenever legitimate
traffic will be filtered by the SAVI solutions. On the other hand,
considering the emergence of new protocols related with source
address usage and assignment, to design a SAVI solution for all the
possible scenario is extremely complex, if possible.
Ideally, a SAVI solution should have a look at the related elements
in the network, and the decide the proper binding and filtering
strategy. SUPA aims at providing the network management application-
based policy protocol(s), mechanisms and models required by network
management applications to easily, accurately, and efficiently select
and use the available communication network capabilities through the
use of network management policies. Based on SUPA, a SAVI solution
can effectively get the visibility of the related elements, and the
traffic to manage. The document proposes a SUPA use case for SAVI.
Bi & Yao Expires March 30, 2015 [Page 2]
Internet-Draft A SUPA Use Case for SAVI September 2014
2. Terminology
The terminology used in the SUPA problem statement draft
[ID.karagiannis-aponf-problem-statement-00] applies also to this
draft.
3. SUPA Use Case for SAVI
With SUPA enabled, the SAVI solution is deployed as a network service
application rather than processes running on each switch. This
section discusses the possible implementation of SAVI with SUPA.
3.1. Element View Collection
From the interfaces provided by SUPA, the SAVI solution at first
collects the related elements. An incomplete list contains: the
address assignment mechanisms and their priorities, the topologies,
the roles of network devices(e.g., host, DHCP server/relay,
switches), the address transition mechanisms, the supported local/
cross-network mobility mechanisms, the tunnel/encapsulation/
decapsulate configuration and mechanisms, the address authentication
mechanisms, etc.
3.2. Configuration Generation
Based on the collected view, the SAVI application tries to generate
the required configurations. The protection perimeter and the port
attribute can be automatically generated based on the topology and
the roles of network devices. The related attachment points can be
specially marked if the address from them are affected by transition/
tunnel mechanisms.
3.3. Binding and Filtering Generation Process
The SAVI application can install filtering rules pro-actively or
reactively. It can make use the interface to the router, DHCP
server, the switches to set up bindings for address. Such bindings
are used to handle the most common cases covered in existing SAVI
solutions. The SAVI application gives an eye on the traffic to
filter. It checks whether these traffic belonging to one of the
possible exceptions, e.g., an address is generated by a transition
mechanism but rather an address assignment mechanism. Such bindings
can then be installed reactively.
Bi & Yao Expires March 30, 2015 [Page 3]
Internet-Draft A SUPA Use Case for SAVI September 2014
4. Normative References
[RFC2119] Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate
Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, March 1997.
Authors' Addresses
Jun Bi
Tsinghua University
Network Research Center, Tsinghua University
Beijing 100084
China
EMail: junbi@tsinghua.edu.cn
Guang Yao
Tsinghua University
Network Research Center, Tsinghua University
Beijing 100084
China
EMail: yaoguang@cernet.edu.cn
Bi & Yao Expires March 30, 2015 [Page 4]
