Internet DRAFT - draft-chen-pim-adaptive-te
draft-chen-pim-adaptive-te
Network Working Group H. Chen
Internet-Draft M. McBride
Intended status: Standards Track Futurewei
Expires: 23 April 2024 Y. Fan
Casa Systems
Z. Li
X. Geng
Huawei
M. Toy
G. Mishra
Verizon
Y. Liu
China Mobile
A. Wang
China Telecom
L. Liu
Fujitsu
X. Liu
Alef Edge
21 October 2023
Adaptive Stateless TE Multicast
draft-chen-pim-adaptive-te-02
Abstract
This document describes a multicast solution which provides adaptive
stateless traffic engineering along an explicit P2MP path/tree. Each
portion of the tree is encoded by a most efficient encoding method.
A tree portion includes all or some of the links/branches/subtrees
from any number of nodes on the tree. An IPv6 extension header is
used to encapsulate a packet which is to be multicast at the ingress.
The overhead of the encapsulated packet is minimal. The packet is
delivered to the egresses along the tree. There is no state stored
in the core of the network.
Requirements Language
The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT",
"SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this
document are to be interpreted as described in [RFC2119] [RFC8174]
when, and only when, they appear in all capitals, as shown here.
Chen, et al. Expires 23 April 2024 [Page 1]
Internet-Draft Adaptive TE Multicast October 2023
Status of This Memo
This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the
provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79.
Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering
Task Force (IETF). Note that other groups may also distribute
working documents as Internet-Drafts. The list of current Internet-
Drafts is at https://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/.
Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months
and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any
time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference
material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."
This Internet-Draft will expire on 23 April 2024.
Copyright Notice
Copyright (c) 2023 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the
document authors. All rights reserved.
This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal
Provisions Relating to IETF Documents (https://trustee.ietf.org/
license-info) in effect on the date of publication of this document.
Please review these documents carefully, as they describe your rights
and restrictions with respect to this document. Code Components
extracted from this document must include Revised BSD License text as
described in Section 4.e of the Trust Legal Provisions and are
provided without warranty as described in the Revised BSD License.
Table of Contents
1. Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
2. Overview of Adaptive TE Multicast . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
2.1. Example Network with P2MP Path/Tree . . . . . . . . . . . 3
2.2. Encoding Links/Branches by Link Numbers . . . . . . . . . 4
2.3. Encoding Links/Branches by Different Bitstrings . . . . . 6
2.4. Encoding Links/Branches from a Node in Multiple Ways . . 8
2.5. Encoding P2MP Path/Tree . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
2.6. Neighbor IPv6 Address Table . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12
3. Multicast Routing Header (MRH) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13
4. Procedures/Behaviors . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17
4.1. Procedure/Behavior on Ingress Node . . . . . . . . . . . 17
4.2. Procedure/Behavior on Transit Node . . . . . . . . . . . 18
4.3. Procedure/Behavior on Egress Node . . . . . . . . . . . . 19
5. Simplified Version . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19
5.1. Simplified Adaptive TE Multicast . . . . . . . . . . . . 19
Chen, et al. Expires 23 April 2024 [Page 2]
Internet-Draft Adaptive TE Multicast October 2023
5.2. Comparisons . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21
6. IANA Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21
7. Security Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21
8. Acknowledgements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21
9. References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22
9.1. Normative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22
9.2. Informative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22
Authors' Addresses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22
1. Introduction
A data center node may have hundreds (or even thousands) of
adjacencies/links. A point-to-multipoint (P2MP) path/tree, used to
multicast traffic, may be big and sporadic. One portion of the tree
may be scattered along a large range of node links. Another portion
of the tree may include only a few links of a node at one end.
Encoding the tree, using only one particular method, may not be the
most efficient.
This document describes adaptive stateless traffic engineering (TE)
multicast along an explicit P2MP path/tree. Each portion of the tree
is encoded by a most efficient encoding method. A tree portion may
include all, or only a few, of the links/branches from any node on
the tree.
The links/branches from a node are split into groups when a
combination of encoding each group is more efficient than encoding
all the links/branches from the node using only one method.
An new IPv6 extension header, a TE multicast routing header (MRH)
with the tree encoded, is used to encapsulate a multicast packet at
the ingress. The overhead of the encapsulated packet is minimal.
The packet is delivered to the leaves/egresses along the tree. There
is no state stored in the core of the network.
2. Overview of Adaptive TE Multicast
This section illustrates Adaptive TE Multicast through an example.
2.1. Example Network with P2MP Path/Tree
Figure 1 shows an example network having nodes P1 to P4 and PE1 to
PE20 (other nodes not shown). For each of the links connected to a
node, a number called local link number (or link number for short) is
assigned to it. For example, PE1 has three links: link from PE1 to
P1, link from PE1 to PE20, and link from PE1 to CE1. These three
links have link numbers 4, 5 and 6 respectively on PE1. P1 has 16
links (other links not shown): a special Split Branch (SB) link,
Chen, et al. Expires 23 April 2024 [Page 3]
Internet-Draft Adaptive TE Multicast October 2023
links from P1 to P2 - P3, P1 to PE8 - PE19, and P1 to PE1. These 16
links have link numbers 3, 4 - 5, 108 - 119 and 120 respectively on
P1. P2 has 3 links: P2 to PE2, PE3 and P1. These 3 links have link
numbers 4, 6 and 8 respectively on P2. P3 has two links: P3 to P1
and P3 to P4. These two links have link numbers 4 and 5 respectively
on P3. P4 has 5 links (other links not shown): P4 to PE4 - PE7 and
P4 to P3. These 5 links have link numbers 54 - 57 and 58
respectively on P4.
[PE2] PE1: Ingress/Root
5/ PEi(i=2,3,..,19):Egress
/ Pi: Transit Node
4/ 6 4
[P2]-------[PE3]
8/
\3 /
6 4 120 \ /4 5 4
[CE1].....[PE1]---------[ P1 ]-----------[P3] [PE4]
5: / \ . 5\ 4/
: 119/ \108 : \ ... /
4: / ... \ 58\ 54/ 55 4
[PE20] / \ [ P4 ]---------[PE5]
/ \ 57/ 56\
/ \ / \
4/ 4\ 4/ 4\
[PE19] ... [PE8] [PE7] [PE6]
Figure 1: Network with Path/Tree from PE1 to egresses PE2 - PE19
The P2MP path/tree from ingress PE1 via P1 to egresses PE2 - PE19 in
Figure 1 is represented by the link numbers along the path: PE1's
link number 4; P1's link numbers 4, 5, 108 - 119; P2's link numbers 4
and 6; P3's link number 5; and P4's link numbers 54, 55, 56 and 57.
2.2. Encoding Links/Branches by Link Numbers
The link/branch from PE1 to P1 on the tree is encoded using link
number as shown in Figure 2.
+-+-+---+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ link from
|0| 1 | 4 | P-BranchP1 | PE1 to P1
+-+-+---+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ (using link number)
|B|N-Links| Link-No |<- P-Branch ->|
Figure 2: Encoding link/branch from PE1 using link number
* B flag with value 0 (i.e., B = 0) indicates that the link from PE1
is encoded by its link number.
Chen, et al. Expires 23 April 2024 [Page 4]
Internet-Draft Adaptive TE Multicast October 2023
* N-Links (number of links) field following the B flag has a value
of 1, indicating there is 1 link from PE1.
* Link-No (Link Number) field with value 4 indicates the link number
of the link from PE1 to P1. The link number of the link from PE1
to P1 is 4.
* P-Branch (pointer to branch) field following the Link-No field
with value P-BranchP1 indicates ("points" to) the start of the
branches/links/subtree from P1.
Encoding the link from PE1 by link number uses 17 bits when B,
N-Links, Link-No and B-Branch fields occupy 1, 3, 5 and 8 bits
respectively.
Encoding the link/branch from PE1 by half flexible bitstring is shown
in Figure 3.
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ link from
|1| 1 |0|0|0|1|0|0|0|0| P-BranchP1 | PE1 to P1(by half
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ flex bitstring)
|B| S-Bitstring |<- Bitstring ->|<- P-Branch ->|
Figure 3: Encoding link/branch from PE1 by half flexible bitstring
* B flag with value 1 (i.e., B = 1) indicates that the link from PE1
is encoded by bitstring.
* S-Bitstring (size of bitstring) field with value of 1 indicates
the size of the Bitstring field is 1 byte.
* Bitstring field with the 4-th bit having value of 1 indicates the
link from PE1 to P1 with link number 4. The link number of the
link from PE1 to P1 is 4.
* P-Branch field is the same as that in Figure 2.
Encoding the link/branch from PE1 by half flexible bitstring uses 24
bits when B, S-Bitstring, Bitstring and B-Branch fields occupy 1, 7,
8 and 8 bits respectively.
For encoding the link/branch from PE1, using link number is more
efficient than using half flexible bitstring. The former is
selected.
Note: Encoding the link/branch from PE1 by fix bitstring is shown in
Figure 4. The size of bitstring is fixed and is the maximum link
number (bits), which is 6 (bits).
Chen, et al. Expires 23 April 2024 [Page 5]
Internet-Draft Adaptive TE Multicast October 2023
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ link from
|1|0|0|0|1|0|0| P-BranchP1 | PE1 to P1
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ (using fix bitstring)
|B| Bitstring |<- P-Branch ->|
Figure 4: Encoding link/branch from PE1 using fix bitstring
* B flag with value 1 (i.e., B = 1) indicates that the link from PE1
is encoded by fix bitstring.
* Bitstring field with the 4-th bit having value of 1 indicates the
link from PE1 to P1 with link number 4.
* P-Branch field is the same as that in Figure 2.
This encoding uses 15 bits and is more efficient than the one by link
number (which needs 17 bits). However, if there are changes on links
of PE1 (e.g., adding a link to PE1), the maximum link number (e.g.,
6) used in the fix bitstring is different from the one (e.g., 7) on
PE1 and encoding the link from PE1 by fix bitstring can not be used.
This document will not use fix bitstring.
2.3. Encoding Links/Branches by Different Bitstrings
When different bitstrings can be selected to encode a portion of a
tree, a Bitstring Identifier (B-I) field is defined to indicate which
bitstring is used. Value 0 and 1 in B-I field indicate flexible and
half flexible bitstring respectively.
Encoding the links/branches from P4 by half flexible bitstring is
shown in Figure 5.
1 54 - 57 64
Size +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+..+-+-+-+-+-+-+..+-+ Links from P4
9 |1| 1 | 8 |0|..|0|1|1|1|1|0|..|0| to PE4-PE7
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+..+-+-+-+-+-+-+..+-+ (by half flexible
|B|B-I| S-Bitstring |<---- Bitstring ---->| bitstring)
Figure 5: Encoding links/branches from P4 by half flexible bitstring
* B flag with value 1 (i.e., B = 1) indicates that the links from P4
are encoded by bitstring.
* B-I field with value 1 (i.e., B-I = 1) indicates that the links
from P4 are encoded by half flexible bitstring.
* S-Bitstring (size of bitstring) field with value of 8 indicates
the size of the Bitstring field is 8 bytes (i.e., 64 bits).
Chen, et al. Expires 23 April 2024 [Page 6]
Internet-Draft Adaptive TE Multicast October 2023
* Bitstring field with each of the 54-th - 57-th bit having value of
1 indicates that the links from P4 with link numbers 54 - 57
(i.e., 54, 55, 56, 57) are on the path/tree.
Encoding the links/branches from P4 by half flexible bitstring uses 9
bytes.
Encoding the links/branches from P4 by flexible bitstring is shown in
Figure 6.
54 57
Size+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+..+-+ Links from P4
3 |1| 0 | 54 | 1 |1|1|1|1|0|..|0| to PE4-PE7
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+..+-+ (by flexible
|B|B-I|<-Start-BitNo->|S-Bitstring|<-Bitstring ->| bitstring)
Figure 6: Encoding links/branches from P4 by flexible bitstring
* B flag with value 1 (i.e., B = 1) indicates that the links from P4
are encoded by bitstring.
* B-I field with value 0 (i.e., B-I = 0) indicates that the links
from P4 are encoded by flexible bitstring.
* Start-BitNo (Start Bit Number) field has value of 54, indicating
the first bit in the Bitstring field is bit 54, the second bit is
bit 55, the third bit is bit 56, and so on.
* S-Bitstring (size of bitstring) field with value of 1 indicates
the size of the Bitstring field is 1 byte (i.e., 8 bits).
* Bitstring field with each of the 54-th - 57-th bit having value of
1 indicates that the links from P4 with link numbers 54 - 57
(i.e., 54, 55, 56, 57) are on the path/tree.
Encoding the links/branches from P4 by flexible bitstring uses 3
bytes and is more efficient than the one by half flexible bitstring,
which uses 9 bytes.
Encoding the links/branches from P1 by half flexible bitstring is
shown in Figure 7.
Chen, et al. Expires 23 April 2024 [Page 7]
Internet-Draft Adaptive TE Multicast October 2023
1 2 3 4 5 6 108..119
Size+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+..+-+-+..+-+-+ -+
18 |1| 1 | 15 |0|0|0|1|1|0|..|0|1|..|1|0| |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+..+-+-+..+-+-+ |Links from P1 to
|B|B-I| S-Bitstring |<------ Bitstring ------>| |P2-P3,PE8-PE19
|(by half flex
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | bitstring)
2 | P-BranchP2 | P-BranchP3 | |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ -+
|<-- "Pointers" to Branches --> |
Figure 7: Encoding links/branches from P1 by half flexible bitstring
* B flag with value 1 (i.e., B = 1) indicates that the links from P1
are encoded by bitstring.
* B-I field with value 1 (i.e., B-I = 1) indicates that the links
from P1 are encoded by half flexible bitstring.
* S-Bitstring (size of bitstring) field with value of 15 indicates
the size of the Bitstring field is 15 bytes (i.e., 120 bits).
* Bitstring field with each of the 4-th, 5-th, 108-th - 119-th bit
having value of 1 indicates that the links from P1 with link
numbers 4, 5, 108 - 119 are on the path/tree.
* P-Branch field contains the "Pointers" to the starts of the
branches/links from the next hop nodes of P1. The first "Pointer"
has value P-BranchP2 to the start of the branches/links from P2.
The second "Pointer" has value P-BranchP3 to the start of the
branch/link from P3.
Encoding the links/branches from P1 by half flexible bitstring uses
18 bytes.
2.4. Encoding Links/Branches from a Node in Multiple Ways
Encoding the links/branches from P1 in multiple ways is shown in
Figure 8. The links/branches from P1 on the P2MP path/tree is split
into two groups (named G1 and G2) by Split Branch (SB) links. The
first group has links/branches from P1 to P2 - P3. The second group
has links/branches from P1 to PE8 - PE19. The first group is encoded
by link numbers. The second group is encoded by flexible bitstring.
Chen, et al. Expires 23 April 2024 [Page 8]
Internet-Draft Adaptive TE Multicast October 2023
Size+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ ----+
20 |0| 2 | 3 | P-BranchG1=16 | | 2 SB links split
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | links from P1
| 3 | P-BranchG2=12 | | into 2 groups:
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ ----+ G1 and G2
|B|N-Links| Link-No |<--P-Branch -->|
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ --------+ Group G1:
16 |0| 2 | 4 | P-BranchP2 = 8| | Links from P1
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | to P2-P3 (by
| 5 | P-BranchP3 = 6| | link numbers)
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ --------+
108...119 Group G2:
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+...+-+-+-+-+-+ Links from P1
12 |1| 0 | 108 | 2 |1|...|1|0|0|0|0| to PE8-PE19
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+...+-+-+-+-+-+ (by flexible
|B|B-I|<-Start-BitNo->| S-Bits |<- Bitstring ->| bitstring)
Figure 8: Encoding links from P1 by link number and flexible
bitstring
Two SB links with link number 3 split the links/branches of P1 into
two groups: G1 and G2. The first SB link with link number 3 is
followed by P-BranchG1=16, which "points" to the start (byte 16) of
the first group of links/branches from P1. The second SB link with
link number 3 is followed by P-BranchG2=12, which "points" to the
start (byte 12) of the second group of links/branches from P1. The
encoding of the links/branches from P1 to P2 - P3 is similar to the
encoding of the links/branches from PE1 to P1 by link number in
Figure 2. The encoding of the links/branches from P1 to PE8 - PE19
is similar to the encoding of the links/branches from P4 to PE4 - PE7
by flexible bitstring in Figure 6.
In this case, encoding the links from P1 by SB links, link numbers
and flexible bitstring needs 12 bytes (4 bytes (byte 20 - 17) for two
SB links by link numbers (padding not shown), 4 bytes (byte 16 - 13)
for the first group using link numbers, and 4 bytes (byte 12 - 9) for
the second group by flexible bitstring). Encoding links from P1 by
any one encoding method needs more space. For example, encoding
links from P1 by half flexible needs 18 bytes.
2.5. Encoding P2MP Path/Tree
Encoding the P2MP path/tree is shown in Figure 9.
Chen, et al. Expires 23 April 2024 [Page 9]
Internet-Draft Adaptive TE Multicast October 2023
Size+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ link from PE1 to P1
23 |0| 1 | 4 | P-BranchP1=20 | (by link number)
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ ----+
20 |0| 2 | 3 | P-BranchG1=16 | | 2 SB links split
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | links from P1
| 3 | P-BranchG2=12 | | into 2 groups:
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ ----+ G1 and G2
|B|N-Links| Link-No |<--P-Branch -->|
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ --------+ Group G1:
16 |0| 2 | 4 | P-BranchP2 = 8| | Links from P1
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | to P2-P3 (by
| 5 | P-BranchP3 = 6| | link numbers)
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ --------+
108...119 Group G2:
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+...+-+-+-+-+-+ Links from P1
12 |1| 0 | 108 | 2 |1|...|1|0|0|0|0| to PE8-PE19
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+...+-+-+-+-+-+ (by flexible
|B|B-I|<-Start-BitNo->| S-Bits |<- Bitstring ->| bitstring)
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ Links from P2
8 |1| 1 | 1 |0|0|0|1|0|1|0|0| to PE2-PE3
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ (by half flex
|B|B-I| S-Bits |<- Bitstring ->| bitstring)
|B|N-Links| Link-No |<--P-Branch -->|
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ link from P3 to P4
6 |0| 1 | 5 | P-BranchP4 = 3| (by link number)
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ Links from P4
3 |1| 0 | 54 | 1 |1|1|1|1|0|0|0|0| to PE4-PE7
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ (by flexible
|B|B-I|<-Start-BitNo->| S-Bits |<- Bitstring ->| bitstring)
Figure 9: Encoding P2MP path/tree
The link from PE1 to P1 is encoded by link number in 3 bytes (byte 23
- 21 (i.e., 23, 22 and 21), padding not shown). The Link-No field
with value of 4 indicates the link with link number 4 from PE1 to P1.
The value 20 in P-Branch field (i.e., P-BranchP1 = 20) "points" to
the start (byte 20) of the links/branches from P1. Encoding the link
from PE1 using link number is more efficient than other encodings
when there are changes on links of PE1.
The links/branches from P1 are split into two small groups (G1 and
G2) of links/branches using SB links in 4 bytes (byte 20 - 17).
Links from P1 to P2 - P3 are in group G1 and are encoded using link
numbers in 4 bytes (byte 16 - 13). Links from P1 to PE8 - PE19 are
in group G2 and are encoded using flexible bitstring in 4 bytes (byte
12 - 9). The first SB link with link number 3 is followed by
P-BranchG1=16, which "points" to the start (byte 16) of the first
group of links/branches from P1. The second SB link with link number
Chen, et al. Expires 23 April 2024 [Page 10]
Internet-Draft Adaptive TE Multicast October 2023
3 is followed by P-BranchG2=12, which "points" to the start (byte 12)
of the second group of links/branches from P1. The encoding of the
SB links from P1 to G1 and G2 contains two links with link number 3
and two P-Branch fields with values 16 and 12 as pointers pointing to
the links from P1 to P2 - P3 and the links from P1 to PE8 - PE19
respectively.
The links from P2 to PE2 - PE3 are encoded by half flexible bitstring
in 2 bytes (byte 8 - 7), wherein B-I = 1 indicates half flexible
bitstring.
The links/branches from P1 to P2 - P3 are encoded by link numbers in
4 bytes (byte 16 - 13). The link from P3 to P4 is encoded by link
number in 3 bytes (byte 6 - 4).
The links/branches from P1 to PE8 - PE19 are encoded by flexible
bitstring in 4 bytes (byte 12 - 9), wherein B-I = 0 indicates
flexible bitstring.
The links/branches from P4 to PE4 - PE7 are encoded by flexible
bitstring in 3 bytes (byte 3 - 1), wherein B-I = 0 indicates flexible
bitstring.
The encoding of the tree by selecting a most efficient encoding
method for each portion of the tree is optimal. It uses 23 bytes in
total. The encoding of the tree by half flexible bitstring uses 35
bytes (3 bytes for link from PE1 to P1, 18 bytes for links from P1 to
P2-P3 and PE8-PE19, 2 bytes for link from P2 to PE2-PE3, 3 bytes for
link from P3 to P4, and 9 bytes for link from P4 to PE4-PE7). The
encoding of the tree by flexible bitstring uses 33 bytes (4 bytes for
link from PE1 to P1, 19 bytes for links from P1 to P2-P3 and
PE8-PE19, 3 bytes for link from P2 to PE2-PE3, 4 bytes for link from
P3 to P4, and 3 bytes for link from P4 to PE4-PE7). The encoding of
the tree by link number uses 38 bytes (assuming 1.5 bytes for a big
link number such as 108 and 54, 3 bytes for link from PE1 to P1, 22
bytes for links from P1 to P2-P3 and PE8-PE19, 3 bytes for link from
P2 to PE2-PE3, 3 bytes for link from P3 to P4, and 7 bytes for link
from P4 to PE4-PE7).
A controller such as PCE as a controller has the P2MP path and the
link numbers of the links on every node. The controller can send the
ingress the P2MP path encoded.
After receiving a packet from traffic source CE1, ingress PE1
encapsulates the packet in a MRH with the P2MP path encoded. The
packet in the MRH is transmitted along the path to the egresses of
the path.
Chen, et al. Expires 23 April 2024 [Page 11]
Internet-Draft Adaptive TE Multicast October 2023
When a node such as P1 receives a packet with the MRH, the node gets
each of its link numbers, finds the address of the next hop from an
neighbor address table using the link number, and sends the packet to
the next hop.
2.6. Neighbor IPv6 Address Table
Figure 10 shows the neighbor IPv6 address table of P1. The table has
16 rows of link number, link type and IPv6 address of next hop node.
The first row has link number 3 and link type SB (Split Branch) for
the split branch link of P1. The other columns in the first row are
NULL (empty). The 2nd row has link number 4, link type P2P (Point to
Point) for link from P1 to next hop P2 and IPv6 address of next hop
P2. The 3rd row has link number 5, link type P2P for link from P1 to
next hop P3 and P3's IPv6 address. The 4-th row has link number 108,
link type P2P2E (P2P to Egress) for link from P1 to next hop egress
PE8 and PE8's IPv6 address. The 15-th row has link number 119, link
type P2P2E for link from P1 to next hop egress PE19 and PE19's IPv6
address. The 16-th row has link number 120, link type P2P for link
from P1 to next hop PE1 and PE1's IPv6 address.
+==============+============+======================+
| Link number | Link type | Address of next hop |
+==============+============+======================+
| 3 | SB | NULL |
+--------------+------------+----------------------+
| 4 | P2P | IPv6 address of P2 |
+--------------+------------+----------------------+
| 5 | P2P | IPv6 address of P3 |
+--------------+------------+----------------------+
| 108 | P2P2E | IPv6 address of PE8 |
+--------------+------------+----------------------+
~ : : : ~
+--------------+------------+----------------------+
| 119 | P2P2E | IPv6 address of PE19 |
+--------------+------------+----------------------+
| 120 | P2P | IPv6 address of PE20 |
+==============+============+======================+
Figure 10: Neighbor IPv6 address table of P1
Using link number 4, P1 gets P2's IPv6 address from the table; using
link number 5, P1 gets P3's IPv6 address from the table; using link
number 108, P1 knows that the link with link number 108 is a P2P2E
link from the table and gets PE8's IPv6 address from the table; and
so on.
Chen, et al. Expires 23 April 2024 [Page 12]
Internet-Draft Adaptive TE Multicast October 2023
Using link number 3, P1 knows that the link with link number 3 is a
split branch (SB) link from the table. P1 gets the P-Branch for the
SB link pointing to a group of links, duplicates the packet received
for each of the links in the group and sends a packet copy to the
next hop of the link.
3. Multicast Routing Header (MRH)
Figure 11 shows a Multicast Routing Header (MRH) in an IPv6 packet.
The IPv6 packet comprises an IPv6 header with a destination address
(DA) and source address (SA) of IPv6, a routing header with Routing
type (TBD) indicating MRH and an IP multicast datagram. The routing
header is indicated by the Next Header in the IPv6 header.
+-----------------+------------------+------------------------+
| IPv6 header: | Routing header: | IP multicast datagram |
| | | (IP datagram header + |
| Next Header = | Next Header | data) |
| Routing header | | |
| | Hdr Ext Len | |
| SA=IPv6 Address | Routing Type = | |
| DA=IPv6 Address | TBD (MRH) | |
| | SL, sub-tree | |
+-----------------+------------------+------------------------+
|<---- MRH ---->|
Figure 11: Multicast Routing Header (MRH) in IPv6 packet
The format of the MRH is shown in Figure 12.
0 1 2 3
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Next Header | Hdr Ext Len |RoutingType=TBD|SL(SubtreeLeft)|
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Sub-tree encoded |
: :
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
Figure 12: Format of Multicast Routing Header (MRH)
The MRH has the following fields:
Next Header: The type of the header after the MRH. Either another
extension header or the type of IP multicast datagram in the
packet.
Hdr Ext Len: Its value indicates the length of the MRH in a unit of
Chen, et al. Expires 23 April 2024 [Page 13]
Internet-Draft Adaptive TE Multicast October 2023
64 bits (i.e., 8 bytes) excluding the first 8 bytes.
Routing Type: Its value TBD indicates that the routing header is a
Multicast Routing Header (MRH) for TE multicast.
Sub-tree Left (SL): Its value as a pointer points to the sub-tree.
Sub-tree: Its value encodes the TE multicast sub-tree/tree.
The P2MP path/tree from PE1 via P1 to PE2 - PE19 in Figure 1 is
encoded as illustrated in Figure 9. For an IP multicast packet to be
transmitted by the P2MP path/tree, PE1 constructs an IPv6 packet for
each sub-tree/branch from PE1 and sends the packet containing a MRH
and the IP multicast packet to the next hop along the sub-tree.
The P2MP path/tree has one sub-tree from PE1 via P1 to PE2 - PE19.
PE1 finds P1's IPv6 address from PE1's neighbor IPv6 address table
using the link number 4 of the link from PE1 to P1 and sets DA
(destination address) of the IPv6 packet to P1's IPv6 address and SA
(source address) of the IPv6 packet to PE1's IPv6 address. PE1
builds the MRH based on the encoding of the tree in Figure 9, sets SL
to 20 (P-BranchP1 = 20 for the link from PE1 to P1). Figure 13 shows
the IPv6 packet to be sent to P1, which is received by P1. Note that
some details are not shown.
Chen, et al. Expires 23 April 2024 [Page 14]
Internet-Draft Adaptive TE Multicast October 2023
| IPv6 Header | <-------- MRH --------> |
+-------------+-------------------------------+-------------+
|DA=P1's IPv6 |Routing Type = TBD, SL = 20 |IP multicast |
|SA=PE1's IPv6|sub-tree from P1 to PE2-PE19 |datagram |
+-------------+-------------------------------+-------------+
Size Links
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ ----+
20 |0| 2 | 3 | P-BranchG1=16 | | 2 SB links split
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | links from P1
| 3 | P-BranchG2=12 | | into 2 groups:
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ ----+ G1 and G2
|B|N-Links| Link-No |<--P-Branch -->|
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ --------+ Group G1:
16 |0| 2 | 4 | P-BranchP2 = 8| | Links from P1
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | to P2-P3 (by
| 5 | P-BranchP3 = 6| | link numbers)
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ --------+
108...119 Group G2:
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+...+-+-+-+-+-+ Links from P1
12 |1| 0 | 108 | 2 |1|...|1|0|0|0|0| to PE8-PE19
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+...+-+-+-+-+-+ (by flexible
|B|B-I|<-Start-BitNo->| S-Bits |<- Bitstring ->| bitstring)
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ Links from P2
8 |1| 1 | 1 |0|0|0|1|0|1|0|0| to PE2-PE3
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ (by half flex
|B|B-I| S-Bits |<- Bitstring ->| bitstring)
|B|N-Links| Link-No |<--P-Branch -->|
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ link from P3 to P4
6 |0| 1 | 5 | P-BranchP4 = 3| (by link number)
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ Links from P4
3 |1| 0 | 54 | 1 |1|1|1|1|0|0|0|0| to PE4-PE7
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ (by flexible
|B|B-I|<-Start-BitNo->| S-Bits |<- Bitstring ->| bitstring)
Figure 13: IPv6 packet with MRH received by P1
After receiving the IPv6 packet from PE1, P1 determines whether the
packet's next header is a MRH through checking if the next header is
routing header and routing type in the routing header is TBD for MRH.
When the next header is the MRH, P1 duplicates the packet for each
link/branch/sub-tree from P1 on the path/tree and sends the packet
copy with an updated MRH (note: only SL is updated) to the next hop
along the link.
The number of links from P1 is 2, which is the value in N-Links field
pointed by SL = 20. These 2 links are 2 SB links spliting 14 links
from P1 on the path/tree into two groups G1 and G2. The first SB
link has its P-Branch field (P-BranchG1 = 16), which "points" to the
Chen, et al. Expires 23 April 2024 [Page 15]
Internet-Draft Adaptive TE Multicast October 2023
start (byte 16) of group G1 of the 2 links from P1 to P2-P3 on the
path/tree. The second SB link has its P-Branch field (P-BranchG2 =
12), which "points" to the start (byte 12) of group G2 of the 12
links from P1 to PE8-PE19 on the path/tree.
For each of these 2 links in group G1, P1 duplicates the packet
received for the link. For the link from P1 to P2 in group G1, P1
finds IPv6 address of P2 from P1's neighbor table using link number 4
of the link from P1 to P2, sets DA of a packet copy to P2's IPv6
address, SL in the copy to P-BranchP2 = 8, and sends the copy to P2.
Figure 14 shows the IPv6 packet to be sent to P2, which is received
by P2. Note that some details are not shown.
| IPv6 Header | <-------- MRH --------> |
+-------------+-------------------------------+-------------+
|DA=P2's IPv6 |Routing Type = TBD, SL = 8 |IP multicast |
|SA=PE1's IPv6|sub-tree from P2 to PE2-PE3 |datagram |
+-------------+-------------------------------+-------------+
Size Links
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ Links from P2 to
8 |1| 1 | 1 |0|0|0|1|0|1|0|0| PE2-PE3
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ (by half flexible
|B|B-I| S-Bits |<- Bitstring ->| bitstring)
|B|N-Links| Link-No |<--P-Branch -->|
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ Link from P3 to P4
6 |0| 1 | 5 | P-BranchP4 = 3| (by link number)
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ Links from P4 to
3 |1| 0 | 54 | 1 |1|1|1|1|0|0|0|0| PE4-PE7
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ (by flexible
|B|B-I|<-Start-BitNo->| S-Bits |<- Bitstring ->| bitstring)
Figure 14: IPv6 packet with MRH received by P2
Similarly, for the link from P1 to P3 in group G1, P1 finds IPv6
address of P3 from P1's neighbor table using link number 5 of the
link from P1 to P3, sets DA of a packet copy to P3's IPv6 address, SL
in the copy to P-BranchP3 = 6, and sends the copy to P3.
For each of the 12 links in group G2, P1 duplicates the packet
received for the link. For the link from P1 to egress PE8 in group
G2, P1 finds IPv6 address of PE8 from P1's neighbor table using link
number 108 of the link from P1 to PE8, sets DA of a packet copy to
PE8's IPv6 address, SL in the copy to 0 since egress PE8 has no link/
branch, and sends the copy to PE8. Figure 15 shows the IPv6 packet
to be sent to PE8, which is received by PE8. Note that some details
are not shown.
Chen, et al. Expires 23 April 2024 [Page 16]
Internet-Draft Adaptive TE Multicast October 2023
| IPv6 Header | <-------- MRH --------> |
+-------------+-------------------------------+-------------+
|DA=PE8's IPv6|Routing Type = TBD, SL = 0 |IP multicast |
|SA=PE1's IPv6| |datagram |
+-------------+-------------------------------+-------------+
Figure 15: IPv6 packet with MRH received by PE8
Similarly, for the other 11 links from P1 to PE9 - PE119 in group G2,
P1 sends a packet copy to each of the egress nodes PE9 - PE19.
After receiving the packet from P1, PE8 determines whether the
packet's next header is a MRH. When the packet's next header is the
MRH, PE8 checks if PE8 itself is an egress/leaf through checking
whether SL is 0. When PE8 is an egress, PE8 decapsulates the packet
and sends the IP multicast datagram to the IP multicast forwarding
module.
Alternatively, after receiving the packet from PE1 and determining
that the packet's next header is a MRH, P1 checks if each of its next
hops is an egress/leaf. When the next hop is an egress, P1
decapsulates the packet and sends the IP multicast datagram to the
next hop. Since 12 next hops PE8 - PE19 are egresses, P1 sends the
IP multicast datagram to each of PE8 - PE19.
4. Procedures/Behaviors
This section describes the procedures or behaviors on the ingress,
transit and egress/leaf node of a P2MP path to deliver a packet
received from the path to its destinations.
4.1. Procedure/Behavior on Ingress Node
For a packet to be transported by a P2MP Path, the ingress of the
P2MP path duplicates the packet for each link/branch/sub-tree of the
P2MP path branching from the ingress, encapsulates the packet copy in
a MRH containing the sub-tree and sends the encapsulated packet copy
to the next hop node along the link.
For example, there is one sub-tree branching from the ingress of the
P2MP path/tree in Figure 1. The sub-tree is from ingress PE1 via
next hop node P1 towards PE2 to PE19. The sub-tree in the MRH is the
encoding of the subtree from P1 (i.e., branches from P1) as shown in
Figure 13. The SL in the MRH is 20, which as a pointer points to the
start (byte 20) of the subtree (i.e., the start of the links/branches
from P1).
Chen, et al. Expires 23 April 2024 [Page 17]
Internet-Draft Adaptive TE Multicast October 2023
4.2. Procedure/Behavior on Transit Node
When a transit node of a P2MP path/tree receives a packet transported
by the P2MP path/tree, the node determines whether the current
routing header is a MRH. After determining that it is a MRH, the
node executes the procedure to duplicate the packet for each of the
downstream links of the node on the P2MP path/tree and send the
packet copy to next hop (i.e., downstream node) of the link.
Suppose that the transit node receives the packet from a upstream
link from a upstream node to the transit node and there are n
downstream links from the transit node on the P2MP path/tree (i.e.,
there are n branches/sub-trees from the transit node on the P2MP
path/tree, where n is greater than zero).
The information about n downstream links from the transit node is
pointed by SL. When B = 1, the number of links/branches from the
transit node is the number of bits with value 1 in the Bitstring
field. The information about n downstream links is encoded by the
Bitstring field and the fields following the Bitstring field. When B
= 0, the number of links/branches from the transit node is the value
in the N-Links field. The information about n downstream links is
encoded by the Link-No fields and the fields following the Link-No
fields.
For each of the downstream links of the transit node on the path/
tree, the transit node duplicates the packet for the link, sets SL in
the packet copy accordingly.
When the link is a link to an egress/leaf (i.e., next hop node), the
transit node sets SL in the packet copy to 0, DA to the IPv6 address
of the next hop (i.e., the egress) and sends the packet copy to the
next hop node.
When the link is a link to another transit node, the transit node
sets SL in the packet copy to the value in the P-Branch field for the
link. The transit node gets the IPv6 address of the next hop from
the neighbor IP table of the transit node using the link number of
the link, sets DA of the packet copy to the IPv6 address of the next
hop and sends the packet copy to the DA (i.e., the next hop).
When the link is a SB link, the transit node sets SL in the packet
copy to the value in the P-Branch field for the link and processes
the links from the start of the links pointed by SL. The transit
node duplicates the packet for each of the links, sets SL in the
packet copy accordingly, sets DA of the packet copy to the IPv6
address of the next hop of the link, and sends the packet copy to the
DA (i.e., the next hop).
Chen, et al. Expires 23 April 2024 [Page 18]
Internet-Draft Adaptive TE Multicast October 2023
4.3. Procedure/Behavior on Egress Node
When an egress node of a P2MP path receives a packet transported by
the path, the DA of the packet is the IPv6 address of the egress node
and there is an indication in the MRH for the egress/leaf. The
egress node proceeds to process the next header in the packet.
For example, after receiving the IPv6 packet from P1, PE8 determines
whether the packet's next header is a MRH. When the packet's next
header is the MRH, PE8 checks if PE8 itself is an egress/leaf through
checking whether SL is 0. When PE8 is an egress, PE8 decapsulates
the packet and sends the IP multicast datagram to the IP multicast
forwarding module.
5. Simplified Version
This section focuses on a simplified version of Adaptive Stateless TE
Multicast and makes some comparisons.
5.1. Simplified Adaptive TE Multicast
Encoding a P2MP tree by selecting a most efficient encoding method
from multiple methods for each portion of the tree is called full
scan encoding. Encoding a P2MP tree by selecting a more efficient
encoding method from two methods for each portion of the tree is
called simplified encoding, where one method is link number and the
other is flexible bitstring.
The simplified encoding is used to encode a P2MP tree in the
Simplified Adaptive TE Multicast.
A flag of 1 bit called B flag indicates which encoding method is used
for a portion of the tree.
* B flag with value 0 (i.e., B = 0) indicates that the links in the
portion are encoded by link numbers.
* B flag with value 1 (i.e., B = 1) indicates that the links in the
portion are encoded by flexible bitstring.
There is no Bitstring Identifier (B-I) field for indicating which
bitstring is used since only flexible bitstring is used. It is
indicated by B flag with value 1 (i.e., B = 1).
The Multicast Routing Header contains a sub-tree using simplified
encoding. The procedures on the ingress, transit and egress/leaf
nodes of a P2MP path/tree consider only sub-trees using simplified
encoding.
Chen, et al. Expires 23 April 2024 [Page 19]
Internet-Draft Adaptive TE Multicast October 2023
Encoding the P2MP path/tree in Figure 1 by the simplified encoding is
shown in Figure 16.
Size+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ link from PE1 to P1
23 |0| 1 | 4 | P-BranchP1=20 | (by link number)
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ ----+
20 |0| 2 | 3 | P-BranchG1=16 | | 2 SB links split
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | links from P1
| 3 | P-BranchG2=12 | | into 2 groups:
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ ----+ G1 and G2
|B|N-Links| Link-No |<--P-Branch -->|
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ --------+ Group G1:
16 |0| 2 | 4 | P-BranchP2 = 8| | Links from P1
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | to P2-P3 (by
| 5 | P-BranchP3 = 6| | link numbers)
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ --------+
108...119 Group G2:
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+...+-+-+-+-+-+ Links from P1
12 |1| 108 | 2 |1|...|1|0|0|0|0| to PE8-PE19
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+...+-+-+-+-+-+ (by flexible
|B|<-- Start-BitNo -->| S-Bits |<- Bitstring ->| bitstring)
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ Links from P2
8 |0| 2 | 4 | to PE2-PE3
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ (by link number)
| 6 |
+-+-+-+-+-+
|B|N-Links| Link-No |<--P-Branch -->|
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ link from P3 to P4
6 |0| 1 | 5 | P-BranchP4 = 3| (by link number)
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ Links from P4
3 |1| 54 | 1 |1|1|1|1|0|0|0|0| to PE4-PE7
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ (by flexible
|B|<-- Start-BitNo -->| S-Bits |<- Bitstring ->| bitstring)
Figure 16: Encoding P2MP path/tree by simplified encoding
The link from PE1 to P1, 2 SB links from P1 to groups G1 and G2, 2
links (in group G1) from P1 to P2 and P3, and link from P3 to P4 are
encoded by link numbers in the same way as the one in Figure 9.
The links from P2 to leaves PE2 and PE3 are encoded by link numbers
in 2 bytes (byte 8 and 7). There is no P-Branch field for each of
these two links since PE2 and PE3 are leaves.
The links/branches from P1 to PE8 - PE19 are encoded by flexible
bitstring in 4 bytes (byte 12 - 9), wherein B = 1 indicates flexible
bitstring.
Chen, et al. Expires 23 April 2024 [Page 20]
Internet-Draft Adaptive TE Multicast October 2023
The links/branches from P4 to PE4 - PE7 are encoded by flexible
bitstring in 3 bytes (byte 3 - 1), wherein B = 1 indicates flexible
bitstring.
The encoding of the tree using simplified encoding uses 23 bytes in
total.
5.2. Comparisons
In general, the encoding of a P2MP tree using the simplified encoding
is much more efficient than the encoding of the tree using any single
encoding method. For example, the encoding of the tree in Figure 1
by simplified encoding uses 23 bytes in total. The encoding of the
tree by half flexible bitstring uses 35 bytes. The encoding of the
tree by flexible bitstring uses 33 bytes. The encoding of the tree
by link number uses 38 bytes.
Overall, the encoding of a P2MP tree by the full scan encoding is
optimal. The encoding of the tree by the simplified encoding is very
close to optimal. For example, the encoding of the tree in Figure 1
by the full scan encoding uses 23 bytes. The encoding of the same
tree by the simplified encoding uses 23 bytes too.
The Simplified Adaptive TE Multicast is simpler than the full version
of Adaptive TE Multicast. The encoding of a P2MP tree in the
simplified version is simpler. The procedures on the ingress and
transit nodes of the tree in the simplified version are simpler.
6. IANA Considerations
This document requests assigning a new Routing Type in the
subregistry "Routing Types" under registry "Internet Protocol Version
6 (IPv6) Parameters" as follows:
+===================+==========================+=============+
| Value | Description | Reference |
+===================+==========================+=============+
| TBD (7 suggested) | Multicast Routing Header |This document|
+===================+==========================+=============+
7. Security Considerations
TBD
8. Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank Jeffrey Zhang and Toerless Eckert for
the valuable comments and suggestions on this draft.
Chen, et al. Expires 23 April 2024 [Page 21]
Internet-Draft Adaptive TE Multicast October 2023
9. References
9.1. Normative References
[RFC2119] Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate
Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119,
DOI 10.17487/RFC2119, March 1997,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc2119>.
[RFC8174] Leiba, B., "Ambiguity of Uppercase vs Lowercase in RFC
2119 Key Words", BCP 14, RFC 8174, DOI 10.17487/RFC8174,
May 2017, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8174>.
[RFC8200] Deering, S. and R. Hinden, "Internet Protocol, Version 6
(IPv6) Specification", STD 86, RFC 8200,
DOI 10.17487/RFC8200, July 2017,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8200>.
9.2. Informative References
[I-D.chen-pim-srv6-p2mp-path]
Chen, H., McBride, M., Fan, Y., Li, Z., Geng, X., Toy, M.,
Mishra, G. S., Wang, A., Liu, L., and X. Liu, "Stateless
SRv6 Point-to-Multipoint Path", Work in Progress,
Internet-Draft, draft-chen-pim-srv6-p2mp-path-08, 24 April
2023, <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-chen-
pim-srv6-p2mp-path-08>.
[I-D.ietf-pim-sr-p2mp-policy]
Voyer, D., Filsfils, C., Parekh, R., Bidgoli, H., and Z.
J. Zhang, "Segment Routing Point-to-Multipoint Policy",
Work in Progress, Internet-Draft, draft-ietf-pim-sr-p2mp-
policy-07, 11 October 2023,
<https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-pim-sr-
p2mp-policy-07>.
[I-D.liu-msr6-use-cases]
Liu, Y., Yang, F., Wang, A., Zhang, Geng, X., and Z. Li,
"MSR6(Multicast Source Routing over IPv6) Use Cases", Work
in Progress, Internet-Draft, draft-liu-msr6-use-cases-01,
11 July 2022, <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/
draft-liu-msr6-use-cases-01>.
Authors' Addresses
Chen, et al. Expires 23 April 2024 [Page 22]
Internet-Draft Adaptive TE Multicast October 2023
Huaimo Chen
Futurewei
Boston, MA,
United States of America
Email: Huaimo.chen@futurewei.com
Mike McBride
Futurewei
Email: michael.mcbride@futurewei.com
Yanhe Fan
Casa Systems
United States of America
Email: yfan@casa-systems.com
Zhenbin Li
Huawei
Email: lizhenbin@huawei.com
Xuesong Geng
Huawei
Email: gengxuesong@huawei.com
Mehmet Toy
Verizon
United States of America
Email: mehmet.toy@verizon.com
Gyan S. Mishra
Verizon
13101 Columbia Pike
Silver Spring, MD 20904
United States of America
Phone: 301 502-1347
Email: gyan.s.mishra@verizon.com
Yisong Liu
China Mobile
Email: liuyisong@chinamobile.com
Chen, et al. Expires 23 April 2024 [Page 23]
Internet-Draft Adaptive TE Multicast October 2023
Aijun Wang
China Telecom
Beiqijia Town, Changping District
Beijing
102209
China
Email: wangaj3@chinatelecom.cn
Lei Liu
Fujitsu
United States of America
Email: liulei.kddi@gmail.com
Xufeng Liu
Alef Edge
United States of America
Email: xufeng.liu.ietf@gmail.com
Chen, et al. Expires 23 April 2024 [Page 24]
