Internet DRAFT - draft-dane-registry-acronym
draft-dane-registry-acronym
DANE O. Gudmundsson
Internet-Draft Shinkuro Inc.
Updates: 6698 (if approved) September 06, 2013
Intended status: Standards Track
Expires: March 10, 2014
Adding acronyms to simplify DANE conversations
draft-dane-registry-acronym-01
Abstract
Experience has show that people get confused using the three numeric
fields the TLSA record. This document specifies descriptive acronyms
for the three numeric fields in the TLSA records.
Status of This Memo
This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the
provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79.
Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering
Task Force (IETF). Note that other groups may also distribute
working documents as Internet-Drafts. The list of current Internet-
Drafts is at http://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/.
Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months
and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any
time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference
material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."
This Internet-Draft will expire on March 10, 2014.
Copyright Notice
Copyright (c) 2013 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the
document authors. All rights reserved.
This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal
Provisions Relating to IETF Documents
(http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of
publication of this document. Please review these documents
carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect
to this document. Code Components extracted from this document must
include Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of
the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as
described in the Simplified BSD License.
Gudmundsson Expires March 10, 2014 [Page 1]
Internet-Draft Adding acronyms to DANE registries September 2013
Table of Contents
1. Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
1.1. Requirements notation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
2. IANA considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
2.1. TLSA Certificate Usages . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
2.2. TLSA Selectors . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
2.3. TLSA Matching types . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
3. Examples of usage . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
4. Security considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
5. Acknowledgements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
6. Normative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
Appendix A. Document history . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
Author's Address . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
1. Introduction
During discussions on how to add DANE [RFC6698] technology to new
protocols/services people repeatedly have got confused as what the
numeric values stand for and even the order of the fields of a TLSA
record. This document updates the IANA registry definition for TLSA
record to add a column with acronym for each specified field, in
order to reduce confusion. This document does not change the DANE
protocol in any way.
It is expected that DANE parser's in applications and DNS software
MAY adopt parsing the acronyms for each field, installed base MAY NOT
get updated.
1.1. Requirements notation
The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT",
"SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this
document are to be interpreted as described in [RFC2119].
2. IANA considerations
This document applies to "DNS-Based Authentication of Named Entities
(DANE) Parameters" located at "http://www.iana.org/assignments/dane-
parameters/dane-parameters.xhtml". Each one of the Sub-registries
will add a column with an acronym for that field.
[RFC6698] and this document are both to be the reference documents
for the three sub-registries.
As these acronyms are offered for human consumption, case does not
matter, it is expected that software the parses TLSA records will
handle any case use in the input> The expectation is that by using
Gudmundsson Expires March 10, 2014 [Page 2]
Internet-Draft Adding acronyms to DANE registries September 2013
the acronyms in production systems fewer bad TLSA records will be
published.
2.1. TLSA Certificate Usages
+-------+----------+--------------------------------+-------------+
| Value | Acronym | Short Description | Reference |
+-------+----------+--------------------------------+-------------+
| 0 | PKIX-CA | CA constraint | [RFC6698] |
| 1 | PKIX-EE | Service certificate constraint | [RFC6698] |
| 2 | DANE-TA | Trust anchor assertion | [RFC6698] |
| 3 | DANE-EE | Domain-issued certificate | [RFC6698] |
| 4-254 | | Unassigned | |
| 255 | PrivCert | Reserved for Private Use | [RFC6698] |
+-------+----------+--------------------------------+-------------+
Table 1: TLSA Certificate Usages
Note: should the short description be updated to be more expressive ?
Other options suggested for 0: PKIX-TA
2.2. TLSA Selectors
+-------+---------+--------------------------+-------------+
| Value | Acronym | Short Description | Reference |
+-------+---------+--------------------------+-------------+
| 0 | Cert | Full certificate | [RFC6698] |
| 1 | SPKI | SubjectPublicKeyInfo | [RFC6698] |
| 2-254 | | Unassigned | |
| 255 | PrivSel | Reserved for Private Use | [RFC6698] |
+-------+---------+--------------------------+-------------+
Table 2: TLSA Selectors
2.3. TLSA Matching types
+-------+-----------+--------------------------+-------------+
| Value | Acronym | Short Description | Reference |
+-------+-----------+--------------------------+-------------+
| 0 | Full | No hash used | [RFC6698] |
| 1 | SHA2-256 | 256 bit hash by SHA2 | [RFC6698] |
| 2 | SHA2-512 | 512 bit hash by SHA2 | [RFC6698] |
| 3-254 | | Unassigned | |
| 255 | PrivMatch | Reserved for Private Use | [RFC6698] |
+-------+-----------+--------------------------+-------------+
Table 3: TLSA Matching types
Gudmundsson Expires March 10, 2014 [Page 3]
Internet-Draft Adding acronyms to DANE registries September 2013
3. Examples of usage
TLSA records using/displaying the acronyms:
_666._tcp.first.example. TLSA PKIX-CA CERT SHA2-512 {blob}
_666._tcp.second.example. TLSA DANE-TA SPKI SHA2-256 {blob}
Acronym use in a specification example: "Protocol FOO only allows
TLSA records using PKIX-EE and DANE-EE, with selector SPKI and using
SHA2-512."
Sides example: "In the case of FOO for practical cases you can treat
PKIX-CA == DANE-TE" (see talk at IETF-87 on DANE for email)
4. Security considerations
This document only changes registry fields and does not change the
behavior of any protocol. The hope is to reduce confusion and lead
to better specification and operations.
5. Acknowledgements
Scott Schmit offered real good suggestions to decrease the
possibility of confusion.
6. Normative References
[RFC2119] Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate
Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, March 1997.
[RFC6698] Hoffman, P. and J. Schlyter, "The DNS-Based Authentication
of Named Entities (DANE) Transport Layer Security (TLS)
Protocol: TLSA", RFC 6698, August 2012.
Appendix A. Document history
[RFC Editor: Please remove this section before publication ]
00 Initial version
01 Updated version based on some comments ready for WGLC
Author's Address
Gudmundsson Expires March 10, 2014 [Page 4]
Internet-Draft Adding acronyms to DANE registries September 2013
Olafur Gudmundsson
Shinkuro Inc.
4922 Fairmont Av, Suite 250
Bethesda, MD 20814
USA
Email: ogud@ogud.com
Gudmundsson Expires March 10, 2014 [Page 5]