Internet DRAFT - draft-geng-msr6-rlb-segment
draft-geng-msr6-rlb-segment
Network Working Group X. Geng
Internet-Draft Z. Li
Intended status: Experimental J. Xie
Expires: 25 April 2024 Huawei Technologies
23 October 2023
RLB (Replication through Local Bitstring) Segment for Multicast Source
Routing over IPv6
draft-geng-msr6-rlb-segment-02
Abstract
This document defines 2 new types of segment: End.RLB.X and End.RLB,
and the corresponding packet processing procedures over the IPv6 data
plane for the MSR6(Multicast Source Routing over IPv6) TE solutions.
Requirements Language
The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT",
"SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this
document are to be interpreted as described in RFC 2119 [RFC2119].
Status of This Memo
This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the
provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79.
Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering
Task Force (IETF). Note that other groups may also distribute
working documents as Internet-Drafts. The list of current Internet-
Drafts is at https://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/.
Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months
and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any
time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference
material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."
This Internet-Draft will expire on 25 April 2024.
Copyright Notice
Copyright (c) 2023 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the
document authors. All rights reserved.
This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal
Provisions Relating to IETF Documents (https://trustee.ietf.org/
license-info) in effect on the date of publication of this document.
Geng, et al. Expires 25 April 2024 [Page 1]
Internet-Draft draft-geng-msr6-rlb-segment-00 October 2023
Please review these documents carefully, as they describe your rights
and restrictions with respect to this document. Code Components
extracted from this document must include Revised BSD License text as
described in Section 4.e of the Trust Legal Provisions and are
provided without warranty as described in the Revised BSD License.
Table of Contents
1. Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
2. Terminologies . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
3. Local Bitstring . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
4. RLB.X Segment Definition . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
5. End.RLB.X Behavior . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
6. RLB Segment and LB Segment Definition . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
7. End.RLB Behavior . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
8. Illustration . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
8.1. End.RLB.X . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
8.1.1. MRH Encapsulation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
8.1.2. Forwarding Process . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
8.2. End.RLB . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
8.2.1. MRH Encapsulation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
8.2.2. Forwarding Process . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
9. IANA Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14
10. Security Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14
11. Acknowledgements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14
12. References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14
12.1. Normative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14
12.2. Informative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15
Authors' Addresses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15
1. Introduction
MSR6(Multicast Source Routing over IPv6) is an IPv6 based multicast
source routing (MSR6) solution, defined in
[I-D.cheng-spring-ipv6-msr-design-consideration], which leverages the
benefits of source routing over IPv6 data plane to provide simplified
multicast TE and BE service in an IPv6 network without unnecessary
multicast tree status and complex control plane protocols. MSR6
needs to reuse the advantages of SRv6 and BIER to implement source
routing.
Geng, et al. Expires 25 April 2024 [Page 2]
Internet-Draft draft-geng-msr6-rlb-segment-00 October 2023
MSR6 has two basic modes of forwarding: one is based on Shortest Path
First(SPF), which is called MSR6 BE mode; the other is based on
traffic engineered, which is called MSR6 TE mode.
[I-D.geng-msr6-traffic-engineering] and [I-D.chen-pim-srv6-p2mp-path]
have introduced structured segment list by defining arguments in each
segment. Based on these existing work, this document defines 3 new
types of segment with local bitstring, which could reduce
encapsulation overhead and enhance scalability.
2. Terminologies
MSR6: Multicast Source Routing over IPv6, defined in
[I-D.cheng-spring-ipv6-msr-design-consideration].
MRH: Multicast Routing Header, a new type of Routing Header which is
used for MSR6.
Multicast domain: A set of network device which could provide P2MP
multicast transport. In this document, the multicast domain is an
MSR domain, where every nodes support the capability of MSR6.
Root Node: Root node is the beginning point of a multicast tree and
also the initiation node of a multicast tunnel. It encapsulates the
packet with a multicast header. The type of the encapsulation
depends on the routing protocol used in the multicast domain. For
MSR6 TE, the encapsulation is MSR6 TE header, which is an IPv6 header
with MRH.
Replication Endpoint: the intermediate node of a multicast tree,
which replicates packet and forwards the packet to the downstream
nodes. For MSR6, the Replication Node is called Replication Endpoint
which can be indicated by the MSR6 Segment and replicate packets
according to the multicast source routing information encapsulation
in the MSR6 header of the packet.
Leaf Node: Leaf node is the end point of a multicast tree and also
the decapsulation node of a multicast tunnel. It decapsulates the
multicast header in the packet and forwards the packet based on
overlay encapsulation.
Parent Node: The parent node is the node that does the packet
replication, corresponding to the concept of a child node.
Child Node: The child node is the downstream node that will receive
the packet which has been replicated ,corresponding to the concept of
a parent node.
Geng, et al. Expires 25 April 2024 [Page 3]
Internet-Draft draft-geng-msr6-rlb-segment-00 October 2023
End.RLB(Replication through Local Bitstring): Endpoint with the
function of Replication through Local Bitstring
End.RLB(Replication through Local Bitstring).X: Endpoint with the
function of Replication through Local Bitstring and defining output
port.
LB(Local Bitstring)Segment: Segment with Local Bitstring.
3. Local Bitstring
For a specific node, the downstream port can be represented by a
specific bit in the local bitstring of the node. If the packet needs
to be replicated through the downstream port, the bit MUST be set.
Or else, the bit MUST be set as 0.
4. RLB.X Segment Definition
The segment defined in [RFC8402] can represent instruction,
topological or service based on the requirement. This document
specifies RLB.X segment for multicast path encoding.
End.RLB.X is a new type of segment which is used to identify the
Replication Endpoint, which is able to replicate the packet based on
the local bitstring in the segment. RLB.X segment is used as an IPv6
address, which is 128 bits and follows the SID format defined in
[RFC8986], consisting of LOC:FUNCT:ARG. RLB.X segment is advertised
by the RLB.X replication endpoint.
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| |
| Locator |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Function |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Local Bitstring | Pointer |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
Local Bitstring indicates a set of adjacency links that the packet
are supposed to be replicated to and Pointer is used to locate the
segment the packet will parse in the next replication endpoint.
Each replication node maintains the mapping relationship of the bit
position and adjacency link in the Local Bitstring Forwarding
Table(LBFT).
Geng, et al. Expires 25 April 2024 [Page 4]
Internet-Draft draft-geng-msr6-rlb-segment-00 October 2023
5. End.RLB.X Behavior
The replication node does the following when the DA of the packet is
a local End.RLB.X SID.
S01. When an MRH is processed {
S02. If (Segments Left == 0 or Local Bitstring==Pointer==0) {
S03. Stop processing the MRH, and proceed to process the next
header in the packet, whose type is identified by
the Next Header field in the routing header.
S04. }
S05. If (IPv6 Hop Limit <= 1) {
S06. Send an ICMP Time Exceeded message to the Source Address
with Code 0 (Hop limit exceeded in transit),
interrupt packet processing, and discard the packet.
S07. }
S08. max_LE = (Hdr Ext Len / 2) - 1
S09. If ((Last Entry > max_LE) or (Segments Left > Last Entry+1)) {
S10. Send an ICMP Parameter Problem to the Source Address
with Code 0 (Erroneous header field encountered)
and Pointer set to the Segments Left field,
interrupt packet processing, and discard the packet.
S11. }
S12. Decrement IPv6 Hop Limit by 1
S13. Replicate the packet based on the local bitstring in the
End.RLB.X and look up LBFT
S14. Set the Segment Left of the 1st replicated packet to "Pointer"
in the argument of the SID
S15. Update IPv6 DA with Segment List[Segment Left]
S16. Forward the packet through the adjacency link indicated by
local bitstring
S17. Repeat S14-S17 with "Pointer+n"(n=the number of packets
which have been updated) untill all the packets are transmitted
through the indicated link
R18. }
6. RLB Segment and LB Segment Definition
End.RLB is a new type of segment which is used to identify the
Replication Endpoint, which is able to replicate the packet based on
the local bitstring in the correponding LB segment. RLB segment is
used as an IPv6 address, which is 128 bits and follows the SID format
defined in [RFC8986], consisting of LOC:FUNCT:ARG. RLB segment is
advertised by the RLB replication endpoint.
Geng, et al. Expires 25 April 2024 [Page 5]
Internet-Draft draft-geng-msr6-rlb-segment-00 October 2023
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| |
| Locator |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Function |
| |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
When RLB Segment is used, there MUST be a corresponding LB Segment in
the segment list. LB Segment is a special segment which is 128-bits
containing the local bitstring. That is, LB segment does not take
the format of LOC:FUNCT:ARG and need not to define the behavior.
There is an argument in End.LB to indicate the next LB segments for
the downstream nodes, for example "pointer " defined in
[I-D.geng-msr6-traffic-engineering].
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| |
| Local Bitstring |
| |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Pointer |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
End.RLB segment and LB segment are used together. Each replication
node maintains the mapping relationship of the bit position with the
adjacency link and the next hop End.RLB SID in the Local Bitstring
Forwarding Table(LBFT).
7. End.RLB Behavior
The replication node does the following when the DA of the packet is
a local End.RLB SID.
Geng, et al. Expires 25 April 2024 [Page 6]
Internet-Draft draft-geng-msr6-rlb-segment-00 October 2023
S01. When an MRH is processed {
S02. If (Segments Left == 0 or Local Bitstring==Pointer==0) {
S03. Stop processing the MRH, and proceed to process the next
header in the packet, whose type is identified by
the Next Header field in the routing header.
S04. }
S05. If (IPv6 Hop Limit <= 1) {
S06. Send an ICMP Time Exceeded message to the Source Address
with Code 0 (Hop limit exceeded in transit),
interrupt packet processing, and discard the packet.
S07. }
S08. max_LE = (Hdr Ext Len / 2) - 1
S09. If ((Last Entry > max_LE) or (Segments Left > Last Entry+1)) {
S10. Send an ICMP Parameter Problem to the Source Address
with Code 0 (Erroneous header field encountered)
and Pointer set to the Segments Left field,
interrupt packet processing, and discard the packet.
S11. }
S12. Decrement IPv6 Hop Limit by 1
S13. Replicate the packet based on the local bitstring in the
SID[Segment Left] and look up LBFT
S14. Set the Segment Left of the 1st replicated packet to "Pointer"
in the argument of the SID
S15. Update IPv6 DA with End.RLB indicated by the first bit set in
the LBFT
S16. Forward the packet through the adjacency link indicated by
the first bit set in the LBFT
S17. Repeat S14-S17 with "Pointer+n"(n=the number of packets
which have been updated) untill all the packets are transmitted
through the indicated link
R18. }
8. Illustration
Geng, et al. Expires 25 April 2024 [Page 7]
Internet-Draft draft-geng-msr6-rlb-segment-00 October 2023
+---+
+--| D |
+---+ B2 +---+
+--| B |----|
| +---+ B4 +---+
+---+ A1 +--| E |
| A |----| +---+
+---+ | +--| F |
A2 +---+ C4 +---+
+--| C |----|
+---+ C7 +---+
+--| G |
+---+
|-->MSR-R<--|->MSR End<-|-->MSR-L<--|
MSR-R: MSR6 Root Node, including Node A;
MSR End: MSR6 Replication Endpoint, including Node B and C;
MSR-L: MSR6 Leaf Nodes, including Node D, E, F, G;
Take End.RLB and End.LB as an example.
Acording to the requirement of the service, a multicast tree is
calculated as showed in the above figure.
8.1. End.RLB.X
8.1.1. MRH Encapsulation
In node A, the packet is encapsulated with an IPv6 header with MRH as
an extension header. The segment list in the MRH is as follows,
which is composed of LB SID.
+----------------------------------------+
| Loc:A|Fun:End.RLB.X| LB:11000000| P:2 |
+----------------------------------------+
| Loc:B|Fun:End.RLB.X| LB:01010000| P:0 |
+----------------------------------------+
| Loc:C|Fun:End.RLB.X| LB:00010010| P:0 |
+----------------------------------------+
Geng, et al. Expires 25 April 2024 [Page 8]
Internet-Draft draft-geng-msr6-rlb-segment-00 October 2023
8.1.2. Forwarding Process
Node A will receive the packet with the destination address of the
IPv6 header is a local SID for node A and the function is End.RLB.X.
Local Bitstring in the segment will be used as an entry to look up
LBFT in node A. So the packet will be replicated into 2 packets and
sent out through A1 and A2. The destination address of the
replicated packet will be set to SID[2] and SID[3] based on the value
of the pointer.
(preamble)
+----------------------------+
|BitPosition | Adjacency Link|
+----------------------------+
| 1 | A1 |
+----------------------------+
| 2 | A2 |
+----------------------------+
| 3 | A3 |
+----------------------------+
| 4 | A4 |
+----------------------------+
| 5 | A5 |
+----------------------------+
| 6 | A6 |
+----------------------------+
| 7 | A7 |
+----------------------------+
| 8 | A8 |
+----------------------------+
Node B will receive the packet with the destination address of the
IPv6 header is a local SID for node B and the function is End.RLB.X.
Local Bitstring in the segment will be used as an entry to look up
LBFT in node B. So the packet will be replicated into 2 packets and
sent out through B2 and B4. The destination address of the
replicated packet will be set to address-D and address-E based on the
LBFT.
(preamble)
Geng, et al. Expires 25 April 2024 [Page 9]
Internet-Draft draft-geng-msr6-rlb-segment-00 October 2023
+--------------------------------------+
|BitPosition | Adjacency Link| Address |
+--------------------------------------+
| 1 | B1 | Add-B1 |
+--------------------------------------+
| 2 | B2 | Add-D |
+--------------------------------------+
| 3 | B3 | Add-B3 |
+--------------------------------------+
| 4 | B4 | Add-E |
+--------------------------------------+
| 5 | B5 | Add-B5 |
+--------------------------------------+
| 6 | B6 | Add-B6 |
+--------------------------------------+
| 7 | B7 | Add-B7 |
+--------------------------------------+
| 8 | B8 | Add-B8 |
+--------------------------------------+
Local Bitstring Forwarding Table(LBFT) in Node B
Node C will receive the packet with the destination address of the
IPv6 header is a local SID for node C and the function is End.RLB.X.
Local Bitstring in the segment will be used as an entry to look up
LBFT in node C. So the packet will be replicated into 2 packets and
sent out through C4 and C7. The destination address of the
replicated packet will be set to address-F and address-G based on the
LBFT.
Geng, et al. Expires 25 April 2024 [Page 10]
Internet-Draft draft-geng-msr6-rlb-segment-00 October 2023
+--------------------------------------+
|BitPosition | Adjacency Link| Address|
+--------------------------------------+
| 1 | C1 | Add-C1 |
+--------------------------------------+
| 2 | C2 | Add-C2 |
+--------------------------------------+
| 3 | C3 | Add-C3 |
+--------------------------------------+
| 4 | C4 | Add-F |
+--------------------------------------+
| 5 | C5 | Add-C5 |
+--------------------------------------+
| 6 | C6 | Add-C6 |
+--------------------------------------+
| 7 | C7 | Add-G |
+--------------------------------------+
| 8 | C8 | Add-C8 |
+--------------------------------------+
Local Bitstring Forwarding Table(LBFT) in Node C
8.2. End.RLB
8.2.1. MRH Encapsulation
In node A, the packet is encapsulated with an IPv6 header with MRH as
an extension header. The segment list in the MRH is as follows,
which is composed of LB SID.
+----------------------------------------+
| LB:11000000 | P:2 |
+----------------------------------------+
| LB:01010000 | P:0 |
+----------------------------------------+
| LB:00010010 | P:0 |
+----------------------------------------+
8.2.2. Forwarding Process
Node A will receive the packet with the destination address of the
IPv6 header is a local End.RLB for node A, which is SID A. Based on
the End.RLB behavior defined in section 4, node A will parse
SID[Segment Left] in MRH, which is SID[1].
Geng, et al. Expires 25 April 2024 [Page 11]
Internet-Draft draft-geng-msr6-rlb-segment-00 October 2023
SID[1] will be used as an entry to look up LBFT in node A. So the
packet will be replicated into 2 packets. For the 1st packet, the
destination address of the IPv6 header will be set to SID B, the
Segment Left will be set to 2 based on the pointer and the packet
will be sent out through A1. For the 2nd packet, the destination
address of the IPv6 header will be set to SID C, the Segment Left
will be set to 2+1 based on the pointer and the packet will be sent
out through A2.
+--------------------------------------+
|BitPosition | Adjacency Link| RLB SID |
+--------------------------------------+
| 1 | A1 | SID-B |
+--------------------------------------+
| 2 | A2 | SID-C |
+--------------------------------------+
| 3 | A3 | SID-A3 |
+--------------------------------------+
| 4 | A4 | SID-A4 |
+--------------------------------------+
| 5 | A5 | SID-A5 |
+--------------------------------------+
| 6 | A6 | SID-A6 |
+--------------------------------------+
| 7 | A7 | SID-A7 |
+--------------------------------------+
| 8 | A8 | SID-A8 |
+--------------------------------------+
Local Bitstring Forwarding Table(LBFT) in Node A
Node B will receive the packet with the destination address of the
IPv6 header is a local End.RLB for node B, which is SID B. Based on
the End.RLB behavior defined in section 4, the node will parse
SID[Segment Left] in MRH, which is SID[2].
SID[2] will be used as an entry to look up LBFT in node B. So the
packet will be replicated into 2 packets. For the 1st packet, the
destination address of the IPv6 header will be set to SID D, the
Segment Left will be set to 0 based on the pointer and the packet
will be sent out through B2. For the 2nd packet, the destination
address of the IPv6 header will be set to SID E, the Segment Left
will be set to 0 based on the pointer and the packet will be sent out
through B4.
Geng, et al. Expires 25 April 2024 [Page 12]
Internet-Draft draft-geng-msr6-rlb-segment-00 October 2023
+--------------------------------------+
|BitPosition | Adjacency Link| RLB SID |
+--------------------------------------+
| 1 | B1 | SID-B1 |
+--------------------------------------+
| 2 | B2 | SID-D |
+--------------------------------------+
| 3 | B3 | SID-B3 |
+--------------------------------------+
| 4 | B4 | SID-E |
+--------------------------------------+
| 5 | B5 | SID-B5 |
+--------------------------------------+
| 6 | B6 | SID-B6 |
+--------------------------------------+
| 7 | B7 | SID-B7 |
+--------------------------------------+
| 8 | B8 | SID-B8 |
+--------------------------------------+
Local Bitstring Forwarding Table(LBFT) in Node B
Node C will receive the packet with the destination address of the
IPv6 header is a local End.RLB for node C, which is SID C. Based on
the End.RLB behavior defined in section 4, the node will parse
SID[Segment Left] in MRH, which is SID[3].
SID[3] will be used as an entry to look up LBFT in node C. So the
packet will be replicated into 2 packets. For the 1st packet, the
destination address of the IPv6 header will be set to SID F, the
Segment Left will be set to 0 based on the pointer and the packet
will be sent out through C4. For the 2nd packet, the destination
address of the IPv6 header will be set to SID G, the Segment Left
will be set to 0 based on the pointer and the packet will be sent out
through C7.
Geng, et al. Expires 25 April 2024 [Page 13]
Internet-Draft draft-geng-msr6-rlb-segment-00 October 2023
+--------------------------------------+
|BitPosition | Adjacency Link| RLB SID |
+--------------------------------------+
| 1 | C1 | SID-C1 |
+--------------------------------------+
| 2 | C2 | SID-C2 |
+--------------------------------------+
| 3 | C3 | SID-C3 |
+--------------------------------------+
| 4 | C4 | SID-F |
+--------------------------------------+
| 5 | C5 | SID-C5 |
+--------------------------------------+
| 6 | C6 | SID-C6 |
+--------------------------------------+
| 7 | C7 | SID-G |
+--------------------------------------+
| 8 | C8 | SID-C8 |
+--------------------------------------+
Local Bitstring Forwarding Table(LBFT) in Node C
Node D will receive the packet with the destination address of the
IPv6 header is a local End.RLB for node D, which is SID D. Because
the Segment Left is 0, the packet will decapsulate the IPv6 header
with the MRH. Node E,F,G will do the same.
9. IANA Considerations
This document makes no request of IANA.
Note to RFC Editor: this section may be removed on publication as an
RFC.
10. Security Considerations
11. Acknowledgements
12. References
12.1. Normative References
Geng, et al. Expires 25 April 2024 [Page 14]
Internet-Draft draft-geng-msr6-rlb-segment-00 October 2023
[I-D.chen-pim-srv6-p2mp-path]
Chen, H., McBride, M., Fan, Y., Li, Z., Geng, X., Toy, M.,
Mishra, G. S., Wang, A., Liu, L., and X. Liu, "Stateless
SRv6 Point-to-Multipoint Path", Work in Progress,
Internet-Draft, draft-chen-pim-srv6-p2mp-path-08, 24 April
2023, <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-chen-
pim-srv6-p2mp-path-08>.
[I-D.cheng-spring-ipv6-msr-design-consideration]
Cheng, W., Mishra, G. S., Li, Z., Wang, A., Qin, Z., and
C. Fan, "Design Consideration of IPv6 Multicast Source
Routing (MSR6)", Work in Progress, Internet-Draft, draft-
cheng-spring-ipv6-msr-design-consideration-01, 25 October
2021, <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-cheng-
spring-ipv6-msr-design-consideration-01>.
[I-D.geng-msr6-traffic-engineering]
Geng, X., Li, Z., and J. Xie, "IPv6 Multicast Source
Routing Traffic Engineering", Work in Progress, Internet-
Draft, draft-geng-msr6-traffic-engineering-02, 24 October
2022, <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-geng-
msr6-traffic-engineering-02>.
[RFC2119] Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate
Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119,
DOI 10.17487/RFC2119, March 1997,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc2119>.
[RFC8402] Filsfils, C., Ed., Previdi, S., Ed., Ginsberg, L.,
Decraene, B., Litkowski, S., and R. Shakir, "Segment
Routing Architecture", RFC 8402, DOI 10.17487/RFC8402,
July 2018, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8402>.
[RFC8986] Filsfils, C., Ed., Camarillo, P., Ed., Leddy, J., Voyer,
D., Matsushima, S., and Z. Li, "Segment Routing over IPv6
(SRv6) Network Programming", RFC 8986,
DOI 10.17487/RFC8986, February 2021,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8986>.
12.2. Informative References
[InfRef] "", 2004.
Authors' Addresses
Xuesong Geng
Huawei Technologies
Email: gengxuesong@huawei.com
Geng, et al. Expires 25 April 2024 [Page 15]
Internet-Draft draft-geng-msr6-rlb-segment-00 October 2023
Zhenbin Li
Huawei Technologies
Email: lizhenbin@huawei.com
Jingrong Xie
Huawei Technologies
Email: xiejingrong@huawei.com
Geng, et al. Expires 25 April 2024 [Page 16]
