Internet DRAFT - draft-gillies-geojson-text-seq
draft-gillies-geojson-text-seq
GeoJSON S. Gillies
Internet-Draft Mapbox
Intended status: Informational April 08, 2016
Expires: October 10, 2016
GeoJSON Text Sequences
draft-gillies-geojson-text-seq-00
Abstract
A proposed standard for geographic data that can be parsed and
produced incrementally
Status of This Memo
This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the
provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79.
Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering
Task Force (IETF). Note that other groups may also distribute
working documents as Internet-Drafts. The list of current Internet-
Drafts is at http://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/.
Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months
and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any
time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference
material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."
This Internet-Draft will expire on October 10, 2016.
Copyright Notice
Copyright (c) 2016 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the
document authors. All rights reserved.
This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal
Provisions Relating to IETF Documents
(http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of
publication of this document. Please review these documents
carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect
to this document. Code Components extracted from this document must
include Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of
the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as
described in the Simplified BSD License.
Gillies Expires October 10, 2016 [Page 1]
Internet-Draft GeoJSONSeq April 2016
Table of Contents
1. Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
1.1. Requirements Language . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
2. GeoJSON Text Sequence Format . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
3. Security Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
4. Interoperability Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
5. IANA Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
6. Normative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
Appendix A. Contributors . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
Author's Address . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
1. Introduction
Large or never-ending sequences of records pose a problem for JSON
that is well explained in the motivation for JSON Text Sequences
[RFC7464]. GeoJSON [GeoJSON] faces the same kind of problem:
geographic datasets often run to the tens of thousands or millions of
records. The problem is amplified by the possibility of large arrays
of coordinates for each of the records.
This document describes a solution to this problem based on JSON Text
Sequences. A GeoJSON Text Sequence is a document containing not,
e.g., a single GeoJSON Feature Collection, but multiple GeoJSON
Feature texts that can be parsed and produced incrementally.
The advantage of using ASCII character RS "0x1e" to denote a record
is that sequence producers and parsers need not enforce a canonical
form for record GeoJSON. Any valid GeoJSON, pretty-printed or
compact, can be used in a GeoJSON text sequence. Additionally,
GeoJSON text sequences inherit from [RFC7464] rules for consistent
processing of sequences with potentially corrupted records.
1.1. Requirements Language
The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT",
"SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "NOT RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and
"OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described in
[RFC2119].
2. GeoJSON Text Sequence Format
Defined in prose, following [RFC7464]: a GeoJSON text sequence is any
number of GeoJSON texts, each encoded in UTF-8 [RFC3629], each
preceded by one ASCII RS character, and each followed by a line feed
(LF).
Gillies Expires October 10, 2016 [Page 2]
Internet-Draft GeoJSONSeq April 2016
The GeoJSON Text Sequence Format conforms to all the rules of
[RFC7464] and adds the following constraint: each JSON text MUST
contain a single GeoJSON object as defined in [GeoJSON].
Heterogeneous sequences containing a mix of GeoJSON Geometry,
Feature, and Feature Collection objects are permitted. How producers
and parsers of GeoJSON text sequences should communicate about which
GeoJSON types might appear in a sequence is not specified in this
document.
3. Security Considerations
GeoJSON text sequences have no security considerations beyond those
of JSON text sequences and the GeoJSON format.
4. Interoperability Considerations
A variety of parsers designed for newline-delimited sequences of
compact JSON text are deployed on the internet today. While there is
no canonical form for JSON texts, and pretty-printed and compact
forms are equally valid, GeoJSON text sequences containing compact
GeoJSON texts with no internal newlines are more interoperable with
existing non-standardized parsers.
In a distributed system where order and exactly-once delivery of
messages are difficult to achieve, GeoJSON text sequences that do not
rely on order of texts for extra semantics are more interoperable
than those that do.
5. IANA Considerations
The MIME media type for GeoJSON feature sequences is application/geo
+json-seq.
Type name: application
Subtype name: geo+json-seq
Required parameters: n/a
Optional parameters: n/a
Encoding considerations: binary
Security considerations: See section 5 above
Interoperability considerations: See section 6 above
Gillies Expires October 10, 2016 [Page 3]
Internet-Draft GeoJSONSeq April 2016
Published specification: [[This document]]
Applications that use this media type: various
Additional information:
Magic number(s): n/a
File extension(s): n/a
Macintosh file type code: n/a
Object Identifiers: n/a
Person to contact for further information: Sean Gillies
(sean.gillies@gmail.com)
Intended usage: COMMON
Restrictions on usage: none
6. Normative References
[RFC2119] Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate
Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, March 1997.
[RFC3629] Yergeau, F., "UTF-8, a transformation format of ISO
10646", STD 63, RFC 3629, DOI 10.17487/RFC3629, November
2003, <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc3629>.
[RFC7159] Bray, T., "The JavaScript Object Notation (JSON) Data
Interchange Format", RFC 7159, March 2014.
[RFC7464] Williams, N., "JavaScript Object Notation (JSON) Text
Sequences", RFC 7464, DOI 10.17487/RFC7464, February 2015,
<http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7464>.
Appendix A. Contributors
TODO.
Author's Address
S. Gillies
Mapbox
Email: sean.gillies@gmail.com
URI: http://sgillies.net
Gillies Expires October 10, 2016 [Page 4]