Internet DRAFT - draft-haleplidis-forces-virtualization
draft-haleplidis-forces-virtualization
Internet Engineering Task Force E. Haleplidis
Internet-Draft O. Koufopavlou
Intended status: Informational S. Denazis
Expires: April 26, 2013 University of Patras
October 23, 2012
Virtualization of the Forwarding Plane Devices with ForCES
draft-haleplidis-forces-virtualization-01
Abstract
Forwarding and Control Element Separation (ForCES) defines an
architectural framework and associated protocols to standardize
information exchange between the control plane and the forwarding
plane in a ForCES Network Element (ForCES NE). RFC5812 has defined
the ForCES Model provides a formal way to represent the capabilities,
state, and configuration of forwarding elements within the context of
the ForCES protocol, so that control elements (CEs) can control the
FEs accordingly. More specifically, the model describes the logical
functions that are present in an FE, what capabilities these
functions support, and how these functions are or can be
interconnected.
The ForCES model provides the necessary abstractions to natively
support virtualization of the forwarding plane. This documents
describes a formal approach to model the necessary parameters
required for defining and managing virtual network forwarding planes
to create virtual network elements.
Status of this Memo
This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the
provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79.
Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering
Task Force (IETF). Note that other groups may also distribute
working documents as Internet-Drafts. The list of current Internet-
Drafts is at http://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/.
Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months
and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any
time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference
material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."
This Internet-Draft will expire on April 26, 2013.
Copyright Notice
Haleplidis, et al. Expires April 26, 2013 [Page 1]
Internet-Draft ForCES Virtualization October 2012
Copyright (c) 2012 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the
document authors. All rights reserved.
This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal
Provisions Relating to IETF Documents
(http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of
publication of this document. Please review these documents
carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect
to this document. Code Components extracted from this document must
include Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of
the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as
described in the Simplified BSD License.
Table of Contents
1. Terminology and Conventions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
1.1. Requirements Language . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
1.2. Definitions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
2. Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
3. Virtualization . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
4. Virtualization Base Types . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
4.1. Frame Types . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
4.2. Data Types . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
4.3. MetaData Types . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
5. Virtualization LFBs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
5.1. vFE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
5.1.1. Data Handling . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
5.1.2. Components . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
5.1.3. Capabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
5.1.4. Events . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
6. XML for Virtual LFB library . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10
7. Acknowledgements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15
8. IANA Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16
9. Security Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17
10. References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18
10.1. Normative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18
10.2. Informative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18
Authors' Addresses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19
Haleplidis, et al. Expires April 26, 2013 [Page 2]
Internet-Draft ForCES Virtualization October 2012
1. Terminology and Conventions
1.1. Requirements Language
The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT",
"SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this
document are to be interpreted as described in [RFC2119].
1.2. Definitions
This document follows the terminology defined by the ForCES Model in
[RFC5812]. The required definitions are repeated below for clarity.
FE Model - The FE model is designed to model the logical
processing functions of an FE. The FE model proposed in this
document includes three components; the LFB modeling of individual
Logical Functional Block (LFB model), the logical interconnection
between LFBs (LFB topology), and the FE-level attributes,
including FE capabilities. The FE model provides the basis to
define the information elements exchanged between the CE and the
FE in the ForCES protocol [RFC5810].
LFB (Logical Functional Block) Class (or type) - A template that
represents a fine-grained, logically separable aspect of FE
processing. Most LFBs relate to packet processing in the data
path. LFB classes are the basic building blocks of the FE model.
LFB Instance - As a packet flows through an FE along a data path,
it flows through one or multiple LFB instances, where each LFB is
an instance of a specific LFB class. Multiple instances of the
same LFB class can be present in an FE's data path. Note that we
often refer to LFBs without distinguishing between an LFB class
and LFB instance when we believe the implied reference is obvious
for the given context.
LFB Model - The LFB model describes the content and structures in
an LFB, plus the associated data definition. XML is used to
provide a formal definition of the necessary structures for the
modeling. Four types of information are defined in the LFB model.
The core part of the LFB model is the LFB class definitions; the
other three types of information define constructs associated with
and used by the class definition. These are reusable data types,
supported frame (packet) formats, and metadata.
Element - Element is generally used in this document in accordance
with the XML usage of the term. It refers to an XML tagged part
of an XML document. For a precise definition, please see the full
set of XML specifications from the W3C. This term is included in
Haleplidis, et al. Expires April 26, 2013 [Page 3]
Internet-Draft ForCES Virtualization October 2012
this list for completeness because the ForCES formal model uses
XML.
Attribute - Attribute is used in the ForCES formal modeling in
accordance with standard XML usage of the term, i.e., to provide
attribute information included in an XML tag.
LFB Metadata - Metadata is used to communicate per-packet state
from one LFB to another, but is not sent across the network. The
FE model defines how such metadata is identified, produced, and
consumed by the LFBs, but not how the per-packet state is
implemented within actual hardware. Metadata is sent between the
FE and the CE on redirect packets.
ForCES Component - A ForCES Component is a well-defined, uniquely
identifiable and addressable ForCES model building block. A
component has a 32-bit ID, name, type, and an optional synopsis
description. These are often referred to simply as components.
LFB Component - An LFB component is a ForCES component that
defines the Operational parameters of the LFBs that must be
visible to the CEs.
LFB Class Library - The LFB class library is a set of LFB classes
that has been identified as the most common functions found in
most FEs and hence should be defined first by the ForCES Working
Group.
Haleplidis, et al. Expires April 26, 2013 [Page 4]
Internet-Draft ForCES Virtualization October 2012
2. Introduction
Forwarding plane virtualization is one key ingerdient in creating a
fully virtualized environment for data centers. One of the main
requirements for virtualizing the forwarding plane is to create a
complete set of abstractions that can be mapped to the physical
devices. The ForCES Model [RFC5812] is such and abstraction as it
presents a formal way to describe the Forwarding Plane's datapath
with Logical Function Blocks (LFBs) using XML. This documents
describes a formal approach to model the necessary parameters
required for defining and managing a virtual network forwarding
plane. Control Elements virtual or physical can be associated with
ForCES protocol to the virtual FEs and create a virtual network
element.
Haleplidis, et al. Expires April 26, 2013 [Page 5]
Internet-Draft ForCES Virtualization October 2012
3. Virtualization
LFBs are abstraction of the forwarding plane therefore they can be
also used as abstractions of the virtual forwarding plane as well.
How a device is exactly virtualized is out of scope of this document
and is considered implementation specific. However an example is
shown in Figure 1 where disctinct and isolated topologies of LFB
instances inside an FE can be virtualiza a physical FE.
+-------------------------------------------------------------+
| |
| +---------------------------------------------------------+ |
| | +----+ +----------+ +-----+ +-----+ +----+ | |
---|--->|Port|--->|Classifier|--->|Meter|--->|Queue|--->|Port|---|-->
| | |In.1| |Instance 1| |In.1 | |In.1 | |In.2| | |
| | +----+ +----------+ +-----+ +-----+ +----+ | |
| +---------------------------------------------------------+ |
| Virtual FE 1 |
| |
| +---------------------------------------------------------+ |
| | +----+ +----------+ +-----+ +----+ | |
---|--->|Port|--->|Classifier|-------------->|Queue|--->|Port|---|-->
| | |In.3| |Instance 2| |In.2 | |In.4| | |
| | +----+ +----------+ +-----+ +----+ | |
| +---------------------------------------------------------+ |
| Virtual FE 2 |
| |
+-------------------------------------------------------------+
Physical FE
Figure 1: Isolated LFB instances
This document focuses on the definition of an LFB that will allow a
CE to deploy and manage virtual FEs. In this approach we try to
define parameters of a Virtual Network Element Manager (VNEM), what
is commonly called a hypervisor therefore treating it as an FE, in
order to be managed by a virtual management software, in this case a
CE.
The VNEM in the ForCES model can be a joined Control Element Manager
and a Forwarding Element Manager which defines which CEs or vCEs
connect to which FEs or vFEs. What is required therefore of this
document is a way to define resource allocation to a vFE and the
topology of the FE or vFEs. This document introduces a new LFB,
called vFE which contains the following details for one tenant of the
network:
Haleplidis, et al. Expires April 26, 2013 [Page 6]
Internet-Draft ForCES Virtualization October 2012
1. TenantID
2. FEs and resource allocation per FE.
3. FETopology
It is expected that there is one instance of the vFE LFB per tenant.
+-----------------+
| Virtual Network |
| Management (CE) |
+-----------------+
/\
| ForCES
| Protocol
\/
+----+ CE/CEM +-----------------+
| CE | <-------> | |
+----+ Interface | |
| Virtual |
+----+ CE/CEM | Network Element |
| CE | <-------> | Manager (FE) |
+----+ Interface | |
/\ +-----------------+
| /\ /\
| ForCES | FE/FEM |
| Protocol | Interface |
| \/ \/
| +----+ +----+
+------------->| FE | | FE |
+----+ +----+
Figure 2: Virtual Network Elements
The Virtual Network Management is able to describe and instantiate FE
topologies and assign CEs to control them. The CEs will be able to
be configured via the CE/CEM interface and the FEs by the FE/FEM
interface
Haleplidis, et al. Expires April 26, 2013 [Page 7]
Internet-Draft ForCES Virtualization October 2012
4. Virtualization Base Types
4.1. Frame Types
No frame types has been defined in this library.
4.2. Data Types
TBD
4.3. MetaData Types
No metadata types have been defined in this library.
Haleplidis, et al. Expires April 26, 2013 [Page 8]
Internet-Draft ForCES Virtualization October 2012
5. Virtualization LFBs
5.1. vFE
The vFE LFB holds information regarding a tenant in a virtual network
device
5.1.1. Data Handling
The vFE LFB does not handle any data. It is similar to the core
LFBs, FEObject and FEProtocolObject. It is expected to be one vFE
LFB per tenant.
5.1.2. Components
The following components have been defined for this FE:
1. FETopology - The Topology of the FEs. From a FE, To an FE, via
port and the link allocation between them.
2. FEs - The FEs supported by this vFE
3. CEs - The CEs, master and backup to control the FEs.
4. TenantID - The tenant ID for this vFE.
5.1.3. Capabilities
The following two capabilities have been defined:
1. ModifiableFETopology - Whether the FE topology is modifiable.
2. SupportedFEs - The FEs that are supported by this topology.
5.1.4. Events
This LFB has no events specified.
Haleplidis, et al. Expires April 26, 2013 [Page 9]
Internet-Draft ForCES Virtualization October 2012
6. XML for Virtual LFB library
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<LFBLibrary xmlns="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:forces:lfbmodel:1.0"
xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
xsi:schemaLocation="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:forces:lfbmodel:1.0
provides="vFE">
<load library="BaseTypeLibrary"/>
<dataTypeDefs>
<dataTypeDef>
<name>PercentageType</name>
<synopsis>A datatype that defines a percentage
</synopsis>
<atomic>
<baseType>uchar</baseType>
<rangeRestriction>
<allowedRange min="1" max="100"/>
</rangeRestriction>
</atomic>
</dataTypeDef>
<dataTypeDef>
<name>FEAdjacencyLimitType</name>
<synopsis>Describing the Adjacent FE</synopsis>
<struct>
<component componentID="1">
<name>NeighborLFB</name>
<synopsis>FE ID for that FE</synopsis>
<typeRef>uint32</typeRef>
</component>
<component componentID="2">
<name>ViaPorts</name>
<synopsis>the ports on which we can connect
</synopsis>
<array>
<typeRef>string</typeRef>
</array>
</component>
</struct>
</dataTypeDef>
<dataTypeDef>
<name>SupportedFEType</name>
<synopsis>Table entry for supported FEs</synopsis>
<struct>
<component componentID="1">
<name>FEName</name>
<synopsis>The name of a supported FE</synopsis>
<typeRef>string</typeRef>
Haleplidis, et al. Expires April 26, 2013 [Page 10]
Internet-Draft ForCES Virtualization October 2012
</component>
<component componentID="2">
<name>FEID</name>
<synopsis>The id of a supported FE</synopsis>
<typeRef>uint32</typeRef>
</component>
<component componentID="3">
<name>CanOccurAfters</name>
<synopsis>List of FEs that this FE class can follow
</synopsis>
<optional/>
<array>
<typeRef>FEAdjacencyLimitType</typeRef>
</array>
</component>
<component componentID="4">
<name>CanOccurBefores</name>
<synopsis>List of FEs that this FE class can follow
</synopsis>
<optional/>
<array>
<typeRef>FEAdjacencyLimitType</typeRef>
</array>
</component>
</struct>
</dataTypeDef>
<dataTypeDef>
<name>FELinkTYpe</name>
<synopsis>Link between two FEs</synopsis>
<struct>
<component componentID="1">
<name>FromFEID</name>
<synopsis>FE source</synopsis>
<typeRef>uint32</typeRef>
</component>
<component componentID="2">
<name>ToFEID</name>
<synopsis>FE destination</synopsis>
<typeRef>uint32</typeRef>
</component>
<component componentID="3">
<name>ViaPorts</name>
<synopsis>The interfaces on which the FEs connect
</synopsis>
<array>
<typeRef>string</typeRef>
</array>
</component>
Haleplidis, et al. Expires April 26, 2013 [Page 11]
Internet-Draft ForCES Virtualization October 2012
<component componentID="4">
<name>LinkAllocation</name>
<synopsis>Percentage of allowed Link usage</synopsis>
<typeRef>PercentageType</typeRef>
</component>
</struct>
</dataTypeDef>
<dataTypeDef>
<name>FEType</name>
<synopsis>An FE inside a virtual forwarding element topology
</synopsis>
<struct>
<component componentID="1">
<name>FEID</name>
<synopsis>ID of the FE</synopsis>
<typeRef>uint32</typeRef>
</component>
<component componentID="2">
<name>ResourceAllocation</name>
<synopsis>Resource Allocation for this FE
</synopsis>
<struct>
<component componentID="1">
<name>Storage</name>
<synopsis>Storage allocation of this FE
</synopsis>
<optional/>
<typeRef>PercentageType</typeRef>
</component>
<component componentID="2">
<name>Memory</name>
<synopsis>Memory allocation of this FE
</synopsis>
<optional/>
<typeRef>PercentageType</typeRef>
</component>
<component componentID="3">
<name>Compuutation</name>
<synopsis>Computation allocation of this FE
</synopsis>
<optional/>
<typeRef>PercentageType</typeRef>
</component>
<component componentID="4">
<name>Bandwidth</name>
<synopsis>Bandwidth allocation of this FE
</synopsis>
<optional/>
Haleplidis, et al. Expires April 26, 2013 [Page 12]
Internet-Draft ForCES Virtualization October 2012
<typeRef>PercentageType</typeRef>
</component>
</struct>
</component>
</struct>
</dataTypeDef>
</dataTypeDefs>
<LFBClassDefs>
<LFBClassDef LFBClassID="18">
<name>vFE</name>
<synopsis>Core LFB:FE Object</synopsis>
<version>1.0</version>
<components>
<component componentID="1" access="read-write">
<name>FETopology</name>
<synopsis>The table of known topologies</synopsis>
<array type="Variable-size">
<typeRef>FELinkTYpe</typeRef>
</array>
</component>
<component componentID="2" access="read-write">
<name>FEs</name>
<synopsis>table of FEs</synopsis>
<array type="Variable-size">
<typeRef>FEType</typeRef>
</array>
</component>
<component componentID="3" access="read-write">
<name>CEs</name>
<synopsis>table of CEs</synopsis>
<array>
<struct>
<component componentID="1">
<name>CEID</name>
<synopsis>The CEID</synopsis>
<typeRef>uint32</typeRef>
</component>
<component componentID="2">
<name>CEType</name>
<synopsis>Master or backup</synopsis>
<atomic>
<baseType>uchar</baseType>
<specialValues>
<specialValue value="0">
<name>Master</name>
<synopsis>This CE is the master
</synopsis>
</specialValue>
Haleplidis, et al. Expires April 26, 2013 [Page 13]
Internet-Draft ForCES Virtualization October 2012
<specialValue value="1">
<name>Backup</name>
<synopsis>This CE is a backup
</synopsis>
</specialValue>
</specialValues>
</atomic>
</component>
</struct>
</array>
</component>
<component componentID="4" access="read-write">
<name>TenantID</name>
<synopsis>The tenant ID of this virtual topology of
FEs</synopsis>
<typeRef>uint32</typeRef>
</component>
</components>
<capabilities>
<capability componentID="30">
<name>ModifiableFETopology</name>
<synopsis>Whether Modifiable FE topology is supported
</synopsis>
<typeRef>boolean</typeRef>
</capability>
<capability componentID="31">
<name>SupportedFEs</name>
<synopsis>List of all supported FEs</synopsis>
<array type="Variable-size">
<typeRef>uint32</typeRef>
</array>
</capability>
</capabilities>
</LFBClassDef>
</LFBClassDefs>
</LFBLibrary>
Figure 3: Parallel LFB library
Haleplidis, et al. Expires April 26, 2013 [Page 14]
Internet-Draft ForCES Virtualization October 2012
7. Acknowledgements
TBD
Haleplidis, et al. Expires April 26, 2013 [Page 15]
Internet-Draft ForCES Virtualization October 2012
8. IANA Considerations
This memo includes no request to IANA.
Haleplidis, et al. Expires April 26, 2013 [Page 16]
Internet-Draft ForCES Virtualization October 2012
9. Security Considerations
Haleplidis, et al. Expires April 26, 2013 [Page 17]
Internet-Draft ForCES Virtualization October 2012
10. References
10.1. Normative References
[RFC5810] Doria, A., Hadi Salim, J., Haas, R., Khosravi, H., Wang,
W., Dong, L., Gopal, R., and J. Halpern, "Forwarding and
Control Element Separation (ForCES) Protocol
Specification", RFC 5810, March 2010.
[RFC5812] Halpern, J. and J. Hadi Salim, "Forwarding and Control
Element Separation (ForCES) Forwarding Element Model",
RFC 5812, March 2010.
10.2. Informative References
[RFC2119] Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate
Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, March 1997.
Haleplidis, et al. Expires April 26, 2013 [Page 18]
Internet-Draft ForCES Virtualization October 2012
Authors' Addresses
Evangelos Haleplidis
University of Patras
Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering
Patras, 26500
Greece
Email: ehalep@ece.upatras.gr
Odysseas Koufopavlou
University of Patras
Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering
Patras, 26500
Greece
Email: odysseas@ece.upatras.gr
Spyros Denazis
University of Patras
Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering
Patras, 26500
Greece
Email: sdena@upatras.gr
Haleplidis, et al. Expires April 26, 2013 [Page 19]