Internet DRAFT - draft-herbert-udp-space-hdr

draft-herbert-udp-space-hdr



 



INTERNET-DRAFT                                                T. Herbert
Intended Status: Standard                                          Intel
Expires: January 2020                                                   
                                                                        
                                                            July 8, 2019


                           UDP Surplus Header
                     draft-herbert-udp-space-hdr-01


Abstract

   This specification defines the UDP Surplus Header that is an
   extensible and generic format applied to the UDP surplus space. The
   UDP surplus space comprises the bytes between the end of the UDP
   datagram, as indicated by the UDP Length field, and the end of the IP
   packet, as indicated by IP packet or payload length. The UDP Surplus
   Header can be either a protocol trailer of the UDP datagram, or a
   protocol header which effectively serves as an extended UDP header.

Status of this Memo

   This Internet-Draft is submitted to IETF in full conformance with the
   provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79.

   Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering
   Task Force (IETF), its areas, and its working groups.  Note that
   other groups may also distribute working documents as
   Internet-Drafts.

   Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months
   and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any
   time.  It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference
   material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."

   The list of current Internet-Drafts can be accessed at
   http://www.ietf.org/1id-abstracts.html

   The list of Internet-Draft Shadow Directories can be accessed at
   http://www.ietf.org/shadow.html


Copyright and License Notice

   Copyright (c) 2019 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the
   document authors. All rights reserved.

 


T. Herbert              Expires January 9, 2020                 [Page 1]

INTERNET DRAFT        draft-herbert-udp-opt-hdr-01          July 8, 2019


   This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal
   Provisions Relating to IETF Documents
   (http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of
   publication of this document. Please review these documents
   carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect
   to this document. Code Components extracted from this document must
   include Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of
   the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as
   described in the Simplified BSD License.


Table of Contents

   1  Introduction  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  3
   2  UDP Surplus Header format . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  3
     2.1 Protocol trailer format  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  4
     2.2 Protocol header format (Extended UDP header) . . . . . . . .  6
   3  Operation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  7
     3.1 Sender operation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  7
     3.2 Receiver operation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  8
       3.2.1 Error handling . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  9
   4  Motivation  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  9
   5  Security Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
   6  IANA Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
   7  References  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
     7.1  Normative References  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
     7.2  Informative References  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
   Appendix A: Checksum processing  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12
     A.1 Transmit Checksum processing . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12
       A.1.1 TX checksum for USH trailer  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12
       A.1.2 TX checksum for USH header . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13
     A.2 Receive Checksum handling  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13
       A.2.1 Simultaneous verification  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13
       A.2.2 RX checksum for USH trailer  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14
       A.2.3 RX checksum for USH header . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14
   Appendix B: Protocol headers versus versus protocol trailers . . . 15
   Appendix C: Protocol field alignment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15
   Author's Address . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16










 


T. Herbert              Expires January 9, 2020                 [Page 2]

INTERNET DRAFT        draft-herbert-udp-opt-hdr-01          July 8, 2019


1  Introduction

   As defined in [RFC768], the UDP header contains a UDP Length field.
   The UDP Length is not required to correlate with the IP payload
   length of a packet such that there may be bytes between the end of
   the UDP datagram and the end of the IP packet. This space is referred
   to as the UDP surplus space.

   This specification defines the UDP Surplus Header (USH) to provide a
   common format for the UDP surplus space. The USH is comprised of a
   four byte base header and some variable amount of data. The base
   header contains a type field that determines how the header data is
   interpreted. This allows different formats and uses of the UDP
   surplus space. UDP options [UDPOPT] are one example of a type where
   the header data contains a list of options.

   There are two use cases of USH:

         1) Protocol trailer (section 2.1)

         2) Protocol header or Extended UDP Header (section 2.2)

   The motivations for USH, include the motivations for protocol header
   format in USH, are described in section 4. 

2  UDP Surplus Header format

   The common format of the UDP Surplus Header (USH) is shown below:

     0                   1                   2                   3 
     0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
                    +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
                    |           Padding (0 to 3 bytes)              |
    +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
    |    Type       |   TSLength    |         Checksum              |
    +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
    |                                                               |
    ~                      Type Specific Data                       ~
    |                                                               |
    +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+

   The fields are:

      o Padding: Aligns the UDP Surplus Header to four bytes. The number
        of padding bytes required is: 3 - ((udp_length - 1) % 4), where
        the udp_length is the length of the UDP datagram as specified in
        the UDP Length field. Padding bytes MUST be set to zero on
        transmission, and MUST be verified to be zero when received.
 


T. Herbert              Expires January 9, 2020                 [Page 3]

INTERNET DRAFT        draft-herbert-udp-opt-hdr-01          July 8, 2019


      o Type: Indicates the format of the UDP surplus space and how the
        Type Specific Data is interpreted. Defined Type values are:

          o 0: Reserved

          o 1: UDP options

          o 2-127: Reserved

          o 128-255: Available for private use or experimentation

      o TSLength: Length of the type specific data in units of four byte
        words. The length of the type specific data is thus zero to 1020
        bytes.

      o Checksum: The standard one's complement checksum that covers the
        UDP surplus area. The coverage starts from the first byte of
        Padding, or the Type field if no padding is present, through the
        end of the IP packet. If the number of Padding bytes is odd then
        a zero byte is logically prepended to surplus area for the
        checksum calculation. 

      o Type Specific Data: Variable length data that is considered part
        of the UDP Surplus Header. This data is interpreted per the
        value of the Type field.


2.1 Protocol trailer format

   When used as a protocol trailer, the UDP Surplus Header immediately
   follows the UDP data. The logical protocol layering is:

                      +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
                      |      UDP header     | 
                      +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ 
                      |       UDP data      |
                    / +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ \
           Surplus |  |   USH base header   |  |
           space   |  +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+  |  USH
                   |  | Type specific data  |  |
                    \ +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ /







 


T. Herbert              Expires January 9, 2020                 [Page 4]

INTERNET DRAFT        draft-herbert-udp-opt-hdr-01          July 8, 2019


   The packet format of UDP Surplus Header as a protocol trailer is:

    0                   1                   2                   3
    0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+\
   |        Source port            |      Destination port         | |
   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ UDP
   |           Length              |         Checksum              | |
   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+/
   |                                                               |
   ~                           UDP data                            ~
   |                                                               |
   +               +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ 
   |               |                      Padding                  |
   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
   |     Type      |   TSLength    |         Checksum              |\
   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ |
   |                                                               | |
   ~                      Type Specific Data                       ~ USH
   |                                                               | |
   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ /

   Notes:

      - The offset of the UDP Surplus Header from the start of the UDP
        header, including possible padding for the USH, is equal the UDP
        Length.

      - The number of padding bytes is 3 - ((udp_length - 1) % 4), where
        udp_length is equal to the UDP Length field. The offset of the
        Type field of the USH is 4 * ((udp_length - 1) / 4 + 1).

      - If the size of the USH header (four plus four times TSLength) is
        less than the size of the UDP surplus space in a packet, then
        the USH is considered to be malformed (see section 3.2).

      - The UDP checksum covers the UDP header and UDP data. The USH
        checksum covers the entire UDP surplus space.

      - A legacy receiver, one that does not understand the UDP Surplus
        Header, will ignore the contents of the UDP surplus space and
        process the UDP data as normal. Protocol data that cannot
        correctly be ignored by a receiver, such as the fragmentation
        option in the [UDPOPT], MUST NOT be in a surplus space trailer.




 


T. Herbert              Expires January 9, 2020                 [Page 5]

INTERNET DRAFT        draft-herbert-udp-opt-hdr-01          July 8, 2019


2.2 Protocol header format (Extended UDP header)

   The UDP Surplus Header can be used as a protocol header. Effectively,
   this creates an extended UDP header format. The logical protocol
   layering is:

                      +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ \
                      |      UDP header     |  | 
                    / +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+  | Extended 
                   |  |   UDP space header  |  | UDP header
           Surplus |  +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+  |
           space   |  | Type specific data  |  |
                   |  +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ /
                   |  |       UDP data      |
                    \ +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+

   The packet format containing an extended UDP header is:

    0                   1                   2                   3
    0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+\
   |        Source port            |      Destination port         | |
   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ UDP
   |           Length              |         Checksum              | |
   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+/
   |     Type      |   TSLength    |         Checksum              |\
   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ |
   |                                                               | |
   ~                      Type Specific Data                       ~ USH
   |                                                               | |
   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ /
   |                                                               |
   ~                           UDP data                            ~
   |                                                               |
   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+

   Notes:

      - Since the UDP header is aligned and a multiple of four bytes, no
        padding for USH is necessary.

      - The UDP length is fixed to be eight so that all bytes beyond the
        UDP header are contained in the surplus space.

      - The UDP checksum covers the eight bytes of UDP header and the
        checksum pseudo header. The USH checksum covers the entire
        surplus space which includes the UDP Surplus Header and UDP
        data.
 


T. Herbert              Expires January 9, 2020                 [Page 6]

INTERNET DRAFT        draft-herbert-udp-opt-hdr-01          July 8, 2019


      - The UDP data length is the IP payload length minus the size of
        the UDP header and the size of the UDP Surplus Header. That is:

        UDP_data_length = IP_payload_length - 12 - (4 * TSLength)

      - If a legacy receiver, one that does not understand the UDP
        Surplus Header, receives a packet in protocol header format it
        will process it as a UDP datagram containing zero length data.
        Presumably, most applications will ignore such packets, however
        if an application applies semantics to zero length datagrams
        then a sender MUST NOT send packets with an extended UDP header
        to legacy receivers.

3  Operation

3.1 Sender operation

   A sender sets a UDP Surplus Header in the surplus space when sending
   an IP packet. The UDP surplus header immediately follows the UDP
   packet at the offset of UDP Length from the start of the UDP header.
   The sender MUST insert up to three bytes of padding to align the
   offset of the Type field in the UDP Surplus Header to four bytes.
   Padding bytes MUST be set to zero.

   If the USH is being used as a protocol trailer then the UDP Surplus
   Header follows the UDP data. If a protocol header is being set then
   the UDP Surplus Header follows the eight byte UDP header and the UDP
   data follows the UDP Surplus Header.

   The IP Length field in the IPv4 header or Total Length field in the
   IPv6 header MUST be set to include the UDP datagram and the UDP
   surplus space. The UDP Length field MUST be set to size of the UDP
   header (eight) plus the size of the UDP data in the protocol trailer
   use case, and MUST be set to the size of the UDP header (eight) in
   the protocol header use case.

   The TSLength field MUST be set to reflect the length of the Type
   Specific Data. The Type Specific Data MUST be padded if necessary to
   align its length to four bytes.

   The USH Checksum MUST be set. To compute the checksum:

      1) Set the Checksum field to zero. Compute the standard one's
         complement two byte checksum starting from the Type field
         through the end of the IP packet (end of the surplus space). If
         the length of the surplus space is odd then a zero byte is
         logically appended for the purposes of the calculation.

 


T. Herbert              Expires January 9, 2020                 [Page 7]

INTERNET DRAFT        draft-herbert-udp-opt-hdr-01          July 8, 2019


      2) Set the value of the Checksum field to the bitwise "not" of the
         checksum computed in the previous step.

3.2 Receiver operation

   The processing for a UDP packet with surplus space is:

      1) Check for minimum length to contain a UDP Surplus Header. If
         the UDP surplus space length is less than 3 - ((udp_length - 1)
         % 4) + 4, then the UDP Surplus Header is considered invalid.

      2) Check padding bytes. If the UDP Length is not a multiple of
         four bytes then verify that the padding bytes following the UDP
         payload are set to zero. The required number of padding bytes
         is 3 - ((udp_length - 1) % 4). If the padding bytes are not
         zero, the UDP Surplus Header is considered invalid.

      3) Check the TSLength field. If the length determined from the
         TSLength field plus the starting offset of the Type Specific
         Data exceeds the length of the IP packet then the UDP Surplus
         Header is considered invalid.

      4) Verify the checksum. Compute the one's complement checksum
         starting from the Type field through the end of the IP packet
         (the end of the surplus area). If the result of the computation
         is checksum zero (~0 or -0) then the checksum is verified. If
         the checksum is not verified then the UDP Surplus Header is
         considered invalid.

      5) Check the Type. If the Type is unknown to the receiver then the
         surplus header is considered invalid.

      6) Process the Type Specific Data per the Type in the UDP Surplus
         Header. If an error condition is encountered in the course of
         processing the Type Specific Data then the receiver SHOULD
         consider that the UDP Surplus Header is invalid.

      7) In the protocol trailer use case, if there are additional bytes
         beyond the UDP Surplus Header, a receiver SHOULD ignore those
         bytes (with the exception that the excess bytes MUST be
         included in the USH Checksum computation).

      8) If the UDP Surplus Header is validated and processed, deliver
         the UDP data to the application.

         In the case of a protocol trailer, the surplus area is
         discarded and the UDP data, which follows the UDP header and
         has length of UDP Length minus eight, is delivered to the
 


T. Herbert              Expires January 9, 2020                 [Page 8]

INTERNET DRAFT        draft-herbert-udp-opt-hdr-01          July 8, 2019


         application.

         In the case of protocol header, the UDP data delivered to the
         application immediately follows the UDP Surplus Header and has
         length of IP_payload_length - 12 - (4 * TSLength).

3.2.1 Error handling

   If an error is encountered when processing the UDP space or UDP
   Surplus Header such that the UDP Surplus Header is considered
   invalid, then the following actions should be taken:

      - In the protocol trailer case (UDP Length greater than eight),
        the UDP surplus area SHOULD be ignored per protocol processing
        convention. An implementation MAY allow configuration that would
        discard such packets. An implementation MUST either process the
        surplus space or ignore the whole space. In particular, the UDP
        Surplus Header MUST NOT be partially processed lest that leads
        to indeterminate results of processing an accepted packet.

      - In the case of a protocol header (a UDP packet having exactly a
        length of eight), the receiver SHOULD discard packets with
        malformed UDP surplus space or UDP Surplus Header. A receiver
        MAY deliver the packet to the application in the unlikely
        scenario that the application applies semantics to zero length
        UDP datagrams and there is the possibility that the surplus
        space is a legacy use case (i.e. the sender set surplus space
        but doesn't use the UDP Surplus Header format).

4  Motivation

   This section describes the motivations for the UDP Surplus Header and
   motivation for protocol headers.

      o While the UDP surplus area was implicitly created by [RFC768],
        the space was never specifically reserved by IETF action.
        Prescribing a format enables interoperable and backwards
        compatible use of this space within the context of defined
        protocol specifications.

      o A common header allows different uses and extensibility of the
        UDP surplus space within a common framework. This is achieved by
        inclusion of a Type field and Type Specific Data in the UDP
        Surplus Header. For instance, legacy uses of surplus space could
        be adapted to use the format and brought into conformance.

      o Since the UDP surplus space was never reserved, there is a
        possibility that the UDP surplus space is already being used by
 


T. Herbert              Expires January 9, 2020                 [Page 9]

INTERNET DRAFT        draft-herbert-udp-opt-hdr-01          July 8, 2019


        some implementations. Disambiguating these "legacy" use cases
        from a newly defined standard format is essential. The required
        Checksum field, and to a lesser extent the Type and TSLength
        fields, help disambiguate uses of the surplus area from legacy
        or accidental uses of the surplus area. Use of the extended UDP
        header format also reduces the chances of misinterpreting legacy
        uses.

      o The USH checksum is checksum offload friendly. See appendix A
        for discussion on checksum offload and USH.

      o The required checksum in the UDP Surplus Header properly
        compensates for those devices that incorrectly compute UDP
        checksum over the length of the IP payload as opposed to just
        the UDP length.

      o A fixed checksum, as opposed to placing a checksum in options,
        avoids the problem that a checksum can't protect against
        corruption of the type field for the option containing the
        checksum.

      o Protocols headers, such as those used in the Extended UDP Header
        format, are more implementation friendly than protocol trailers.
        See Appendix B for more discussion.

      o Maintaining four byte alignment, as is common in IP protocols,
        is beneficial to implementations on several hardware
        architectures. See Appendix C for more discussion.




















 


T. Herbert              Expires January 9, 2020                [Page 10]

INTERNET DRAFT        draft-herbert-udp-opt-hdr-01          July 8, 2019


5  Security Considerations

        The UDP Surplus Header does not address nor introduce any new
        security considerations. The Type Specific Data in a UDP Surplus
        Header may contain security protocol mechanisms or require
        additional security considerations. Security considerations for
        Type Specific Data is out of scope for this document.

6  IANA Considerations

        IANA is requested to create a registry for the UDP Surplus
        Header Types.

7  References

7.1  Normative References


7.2  Informative References

   [UDPOPT]   Touch, J., "Transport Options for UDP", draft-ietf-tsvwg-
              udp-options-07


























 


T. Herbert              Expires January 9, 2020                [Page 11]

INTERNET DRAFT        draft-herbert-udp-opt-hdr-01          July 8, 2019


Appendix A: Checksum processing

   This appendix is informational and does not constitute a normative
   part of this document.

   Checksum offload is a ubiquitous feature of Network Interface Cards
   (NICs) that offloads checksum computation to hardware for
   performance. This section suggests some implementation techniques to
   best leverage checksum offload when UDP surplus space is being used.

   Note that the USH checksum ensures that the checksum computed over
   the UDP surplus space sums to zero in one's complement arithmetic.
   This has the intended consequence that the UDP checksum calculation
   over just the UDP length results in the same value when the UDP
   checksum is computed over the UDP length and surplus space as well.
   This property can be exploited for efficient and interoperable
   processing.

A.1 Transmit Checksum processing

   A UDP packet with a UDP Surplus Header has two checksum that may need
   to be set on transmission: the UDP checksum and the USH checksum. The
   UDP checksum is optional for IPv4 and is required for IPv6 except in
   very narrow circumstances described in [RFC6936]. The USH checksum is
   always required to be set.

   Most devices only offload one checksum on transmit, so a design
   objective is to offload the checksum that covers the most bytes and
   hence provides the most benefit to offload. The checksum that is not
   offloaded is computed by the host CPU. Generally, the checksum that
   covers the UDP data is the one covers the most data and should be
   offloaded. That is, when USH is a protocol trailer the UDP checksum
   should be offloaded, and when the USH is a protocol header (i.e.
   extended UDP header) the USH checksum should be offloaded.

   In generic checksum offload, for each packet the host indicates to
   the device the starting offset where the checksum calculation begins
   and the offset of the field to write the resultant checksum. The
   extent of the checksum coverage is assumed to be the end of the
   packet. In particular, this means that even if the UDP checksum is
   being offloaded, the UDP surplus space is included in the device's
   computation. Ensuring that the surplus space sums to zero in one's
   complement arithmetic avoids any ambiguity with checksum offload.

A.1.1 TX checksum for USH trailer

   The recommended procedure for setting checksums when the UDP Surplus
   Header is a trailer is:
 


T. Herbert              Expires January 9, 2020                [Page 12]

INTERNET DRAFT        draft-herbert-udp-opt-hdr-01          July 8, 2019


      1) On the host set the USH checksum using the normal procedures
         for setting the checksum (section 3.1).

      2) Arrange for the UDP checksum to be offloaded to the device.
         This is done by indicating the checksum start offset to be the
         first byte of UDP header, indicating the checksum field offset
         to be the offset of the UDP checksum field, and initializing
         the UDP checksum field to the "bitwise not" of the appropriate
         IP pseudo header.  

   Step 1) ensures that the surplus area sums to zero in one's
   complement arithmetic, so that in step 2) the value that the device
   sets in the UDP checksum field will be correct regardless of whether
   the device includes the surplus area in its computation or not.

   Note that the USH padding must be set to zero so it does not affect
   the checksum computed in step 1). The USH checksum on transmission
   can be correctly computed by starting the checksum computation from
   the offset of USH Type field.

A.1.2 TX checksum for USH header

   The recommended procedure for setting checksums when the UDP Surplus
   Header is a header is:

      1) Set the UDP checksum on the host. This is normal procedures to
         set the UDP checksum for a UDP datagram with length of eight.

      2) Arrange to offload the USH checksum. The USH checksum field is
         initialized to zero, the offset to start the checksum
         calculation is set to the offset of the Type field in the USH,
         and the checksum field offset is set to the offset of the USH
         checksum field.

A.2 Receive Checksum handling

   In the most generic form of receive checksum offload, a device
   performs a running checksum calculation across a packet as it is
   received. That is, it performs a running ones complement addition
   over two byte words as they are received. The device then provides
   the computed value, referred to as the "checksum complete" value, to
   the host in the meta data (receive descriptor) for the packet. The
   host can use this value to verify one or more packet checksums
   contained in the packet.

A.2.1 Simultaneous verification

   If a device provides a checksum complete value and the UDP checksum
 


T. Herbert              Expires January 9, 2020                [Page 13]

INTERNET DRAFT        draft-herbert-udp-opt-hdr-01          July 8, 2019


   is set, then both the UDP checksum and USH checksum can be
   simultaneously verified:

      1) Pull up checksum to start of the UDP header. That is the
         checksum complete value is computed from the start of the UDP
         header through the end of the IP packet.

      2) Verify the UDP checksum taking into account the pseudo header.
         If the UDP checksum is verified, then the USH checksum is also
         verified.

   If the simultaneous verification fails then further work might be
   needed if checksum failure of the surplus space does not result in
   the packet being dropped. For instance, if the surplus space is to be
   ignored in the trailer use case.

A.2.2 RX checksum for USH trailer

   The recommended procedure for independently verifying the UDP and USH
   checksums when the UDP Surplus Header is a protocol trailer is:

      1) Compute the one's complement checksum across the UDP surplus
         space. If checksum zero is the result, then the USH checksum is
         verified.

      2) Perform one's complement subtraction of the value derived in
         step 1) from the checksum complete value. The result is the
         checksum complete value across just the UDP header and UDP
         data.

      3) Compute the IP pseudo header for the UDP checksum and one's
         complement add the result to that of step 2). If the result is
         checksum zero then the UDP checksum is verified.

   If the UDP checksum is zero (unset) then only the USH checksum needs
   to be verified so steps 2) and 3) can be omitted.

A.2.3 RX checksum for USH header

   The recommended procedure for independently verifying the UDP and USH
   checksums when the UDP Surplus Header is a protocol header is:

      1) Compute the one's complement checksum across the UDP header.

      2) Compute the IP pseudo header for the UDP checksum and one's
         complement add the result to that of step 1). If the result is
         checksum zero then the checksum of the UDP header (zero length
         datagram) is verified.
 


T. Herbert              Expires January 9, 2020                [Page 14]

INTERNET DRAFT        draft-herbert-udp-opt-hdr-01          July 8, 2019


      3) Perform one's complement subtraction of the value derived in
         step 1) from the checksum complete value. The result is the
         checksum complete value across just the UDP surplus space. If
         zero is the result, then the USH checksum is valid.

   If the UDP checksum is zero (unset) then only the USH checksum needs
   to be verified, so step 2) can be omitted.

Appendix B: Protocol headers versus versus protocol trailers

   This appendix is informational and does not constitute a normative
   part of this document.

   Protocol headers by definition are data at the precede the payload of
   a packet, whereas protocol trailers follow the payload. By nearly
   universal convention, IP protocols specify protocol headers (e.g. IP,
   TCP, UDP, Extension headers) and not protocol trailers. A notable
   exception to this is ESP where the integrity check value is placed
   after the payload data.

   Both software and hardware implementations are designed and optimized
   for processing protocol headers.

   A common technique in software implementations is to "pull up" all
   the headers in a packet into a contiguous buffer as various protocol
   layers are processed. To process a protocol trailer, such as a UDP
   Surplus Header in the trailer use case, an alternate mechanism is
   needed. This may result in copying data from the end of the packet
   into a contiguous buffer. Another disadvantage of protocol trailers
   is that when they are processed a cache miss is almost certain. This
   will be especially noticeable with hardware techniques that attempt
   to pre-populate the CPU data cache with some number of header bytes
   (such as data Direct Data I/O).

   High performance hardware devices that perform Deep Packet Inspection
   (DPI) will be even more sensitive to protocol trailers. Often such
   devices have a fixed length parsing buffer of X bytes (where X is
   commonly 64, 128, or 256 bytes). When a device receives a packet, the
   first X bytes of the packet are preloaded into the parsing buffer
   before processing commences. Protocol processing is performed on the
   bytes in the parsing buffer. If the protocol headers extend beyond
   the parsing buffer then either the device won't process the headers
   (which may mean they drop the packet) or the packet is relegated to a
   slow path. Neither behavior is desirable. Given that protocol
   trailers follow packet payload, it will be common that the protocol
   trailers for a packet are not contained with parsing buffer.

Appendix C: Protocol field alignment
 


T. Herbert              Expires January 9, 2020                [Page 15]

INTERNET DRAFT        draft-herbert-udp-opt-hdr-01          July 8, 2019


   This appendix is informational and does not constitute a normative
   part of this document.

   It is often convenient to access multi-byte protocol fields in a
   protocol header in memory using CPU instructions to access a field as
   a word (two bytes) or double word (four bytes). When such accesses
   are done, the data being accessed can be "aligned" or "unaligned". An
   aligned data access happens when the address of the operation modulo
   the size of the operand is zero, and conversely an unaligned access
   occurs when the when the address of the operation modulo the size of
   the operand is non-zero. On certain CPU architectures including
   SPARC, older versions of ARM, some cases of RISC-V, and even a corner
   case in x86, an unaligned access may incur a substantial performance
   penalty compared to an aligned access. For instance, an unaligned
   access may result in a software trap and handling the memory access
   in software.

   By convention, most IETF protocols are structured to ensure that
   multi-byte fields have an offset within the respective protocol
   header that is properly aligned per their field size. Additionally,
   most IP protocols are defined to have length that is a multiple of
   four bytes. These conventions, along with some implementation
   techniques, have mostly allowed software implementations to be
   reusable across different architectures without the sustaining
   performance hit of unaligned accesses.

   The Padding field in UDP Surplus Header is important to maintain the
   benefits of aligned protocol headers.

Author's Address

   Tom Herbert
   Intel
   Santa Clara, CA
   USA


   Email: tom@quantonium.net













T. Herbert              Expires January 9, 2020                [Page 16]