Internet DRAFT - draft-howard-homenet-routing-requirements
draft-howard-homenet-routing-requirements
Network Working Group L. Howard
Internet-Draft Time Warner Cable
Intended status: Informational December 29, 2011
Expires: July 1, 2012
Homenet Routing Requirements
draft-howard-homenet-routing-requirements-00
Abstract
This document describes the requirements for routing in an unmanaged
home network.
Status of this Memo
This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the
provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79.
Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering
Task Force (IETF). Note that other groups may also distribute
working documents as Internet-Drafts. The list of current Internet-
Drafts is at http://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/.
Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months
and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any
time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference
material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."
This Internet-Draft will expire on July 1, 2012.
Copyright Notice
Copyright (c) 2011 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the
document authors. All rights reserved.
This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal
Provisions Relating to IETF Documents
(http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of
publication of this document. Please review these documents
carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect
to this document. Code Components extracted from this document must
include Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of
the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as
described in the Simplified BSD License.
Howard Expires July 1, 2012 [Page 1]
Internet-Draft homenet-routing-reqs December 2011
Table of Contents
1. Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
2. Requirements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
3. Security Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
4. IANA Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
5. Informative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
Author's Address . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
Howard Expires July 1, 2012 [Page 2]
Internet-Draft homenet-routing-reqs December 2011
1. Introduction
This document describes the requirements for routing in an unmanaged
home network. Home networks are evolving to include multiple routers
and potentially multiple possible exits. These exist may include
multiple Internet access paths (through one or more multiple access
providers), "walled garden" environments for video, VPN, or other
service access, and smart energy devices.
2. Requirements
Reachability between all nodes in the home network. Links may be
Ethernet, WiFi, MoCA, or any other; test all solutions against
mutliple L2 types.
Border detection. Any solution will have to determine the routing
boundary. It is assumed that no home networking device can handle
a full routing table for the Internet, and that a home router
should not be required to do so.
Border may be upstream ISP, or may be a device that is a
gateway to SmartGrid devices, e.g. a controller that speaks RPL
to 802.15.4 and foo to home net. Or there may be no border, if
no external connection has been established.
Must be able to find "up" (a path to the Internet), but must
not be dependent on "up" (Internet connectivity) existing for
intra-home reachability.
May be discovered by routing protocol, or other means.
Robust to routers being moved/added/removed/renumbered.
Convergence time a few minutes or less.
No configuration required. It may be acceptable to require a
single password or passphrase to be entered on each device, both
for security, and to establish the administrative boundary.
Best-path is a non-requirement.
Support for multiple upstream networks is a requirement.
Including wireless offload, video-only, and split-tunnel VPN
scenarios.
It may be assumed that each upstream will be connected via a
separate router, not multihomed off the same router.
Howard Expires July 1, 2012 [Page 3]
Internet-Draft homenet-routing-reqs December 2011
Must support a prefix delegated from each provider. How hosts
handle multiple prefixes is not a routing problem.
Load-balancing among providers is a non-requirement.
If multiple upstream networks can provide a path to the same
destination (such as an Internet host), the solution must allow
for backup in case the router or link to one upstream fails.
Failover time should be within a few minutes.
Must support a "walled-garden" network. This might routing
based on either source address (from the walled garden network)
or destination address (to the walled garden network); support
for both is not required.
Source address selection is out of scope for the routing
solution. Choosing which address to use to look up the
destination address is out of scope for the routing solution.
Cannot assume hierarchical prefix delegation in the home, unless
the Homenet working group finds consensus on a hierarchical
addressing mechanism.
A host with mutliple upstream paths to the same destination (in-
home or external) should be able to use another in case on fails.
Prevent looping.
Should be a lightweight solution.
Must handle multi-dwelling units or other potential dense wireless
or wired networks.
Must be resilient to running on wireless networks. Must be able
to handle both wired and wireless links.
Robustness in the face of unintentional joining of networks.
3. Security Considerations
As a requirements document, no security considerations are created.
The solution should be safe from route injection to perpetrate man-
in-the-middle attacks, especially in multi-dwelling or other dense/
mesh networks, but this may be a link requirement more than a routing
requirement.
Howard Expires July 1, 2012 [Page 4]
Internet-Draft homenet-routing-reqs December 2011
4. IANA Considerations
There are no IANA considerations or implications that arise from this
document.
5. Informative References
[RFC6204] Cisco Systems, Inc., Cisco Systems, Inc., CableLabs, AT&T,
and Cisco Systems, Inc., "Basic Requirements for IPv6
Customer Edge Routers".
Author's Address
Lee Howard
Time Warner Cable
13820 Sunrise Valley Drive
Herndon, VA 20171
US
Phone: +1 703 345 3513
Email: lee.howard@twcable.com
Howard Expires July 1, 2012 [Page 5]