Internet DRAFT - draft-ietf-avt-rtp-mp3
draft-ietf-avt-rtp-mp3
A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries.
RFC 3119
Title: A More Loss-Tolerant RTP Payload Format for MP3
Audio
Author(s): R. Finlayson
Status: Standards Track
Date: June 2001
Mailbox: finlayson@live.com
Pages: 19
Characters: 37796
Updates/Obsoletes/SeeAlso: None
I-D Tag: draft-ietf-avt-rtp-mp3-06.txt
URL: ftp://ftp.rfc-editor.org/in-notes/rfc3119.txt
This document describes a RTP (Real-Time Protocol) payload format for
transporting MPEG (Moving Picture Experts Group) 1 or 2, layer III
audio (commonly known as "MP3"). This format is an alternative to
that described in RFC 2250, and performs better if there is packet
loss.
This document is a product of the Audio/Video Transport Working Group
of the IETF.
This is now a Proposed Standard Protocol.
This document specifies an Internet standards track protocol for
the Internet community, and requests discussion and suggestions
for improvements. Please refer to the current edition of the
"Internet Official Protocol Standards" (STD 1) for the
standardization state and status of this protocol. Distribution
of this memo is unlimited.
This announcement is sent to the IETF list and the RFC-DIST list.
Requests to be added to or deleted from the IETF distribution list
should be sent to IETF-REQUEST@IETF.ORG. Requests to be
added to or deleted from the RFC-DIST distribution list should
be sent to RFC-DIST-REQUEST@RFC-EDITOR.ORG.
Details on obtaining RFCs via FTP or EMAIL may be obtained by sending
an EMAIL message to rfc-info@RFC-EDITOR.ORG with the message body
help: ways_to_get_rfcs. For example:
To: rfc-info@RFC-EDITOR.ORG
Subject: getting rfcs
help: ways_to_get_rfcs
Requests for special distribution should be addressed to either the
author of the RFC in question, or to RFC-Manager@RFC-EDITOR.ORG. Unless
specifically noted otherwise on the RFC itself, all RFCs are for
unlimited distribution.echo
Submissions for Requests for Comments should be sent to
RFC-EDITOR@RFC-EDITOR.ORG. Please consult RFC 2223, Instructions to RFC
Authors, for further information.