Internet DRAFT - draft-ietf-calext-ical-relations
draft-ietf-calext-ical-relations
Network Working Group M. Douglass
Internet-Draft Bedework
Updates: 5545 (if approved) 22 March 2022
Intended status: Standards Track
Expires: 23 September 2022
Support for iCalendar Relationships
draft-ietf-calext-ical-relations-11
Abstract
This specification updates the iCalendar RELATED-TO property defined
in RFC5545 by adding new relation types and introduces new iCalendar
properties LINK, CONCEPT and REFID to allow better linking and
grouping of iCalendar components and related data.
Status of This Memo
This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the
provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79.
Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering
Task Force (IETF). Note that other groups may also distribute
working documents as Internet-Drafts. The list of current Internet-
Drafts is at https://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/.
Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months
and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any
time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference
material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."
This Internet-Draft will expire on 23 September 2022.
Copyright Notice
Copyright (c) 2022 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the
document authors. All rights reserved.
This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal
Provisions Relating to IETF Documents (https://trustee.ietf.org/
license-info) in effect on the date of publication of this document.
Please review these documents carefully, as they describe your rights
and restrictions with respect to this document. Code Components
extracted from this document must include Revised BSD License text as
described in Section 4.e of the Trust Legal Provisions and are
provided without warranty as described in the Revised BSD License.
Douglass Expires 23 September 2022 [Page 1]
Internet-Draft iCalendar Relationships March 2022
Table of Contents
1. Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
1.1. Structured iCalendar relationships . . . . . . . . . . . 3
1.2. Grouped iCalendar relationships . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
1.3. Concept relationships . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
1.4. Linked relationships . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
1.5. Caching and offline use . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
1.6. Conventions Used in This Document . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
2. LINK Property Reference Types . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
3. Link Relation Types . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
4. New temporal RELTYPE Parameter values . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
5. Additional New RELTYPE Parameter Values . . . . . . . . . . . 8
6. New Property Parameters . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
6.1. Link Relation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
6.2. Gap . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
7. New Value Data Types . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10
8. New Properties . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
8.1. Concept . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
8.2. Link . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12
8.3. Refid . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14
9. Updates to RFC 5545 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14
9.1. RELATED-TO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15
10. Security Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17
11. IANA Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17
11.1. iCalendar Property Registrations . . . . . . . . . . . . 17
11.2. iCalendar Property Parameter Registrations . . . . . . . 18
11.3. iCalendar Value Data Type Registrations . . . . . . . . 18
11.4. iCalendar RELTYPE Value Registrations . . . . . . . . . 19
11.5. New Reference Type Registration . . . . . . . . . . . . 19
12. Acknowledgements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20
13. References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20
13.1. Informative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20
13.2. Normative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20
Author's Address . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21
1. Introduction
iCalendar entities defined in [RFC5545] often need to be related to
each other or to associated meta-data. The specifications below
support relationships of the following forms:
Structured iCalendar: iCalendar entities can be related to each
other in some structured way, for example as parent, sibling,
before, after.
Grouped iCalendar: iCalendar entities can be related to each other
Douglass Expires 23 September 2022 [Page 2]
Internet-Draft iCalendar Relationships March 2022
as a group. CATEGORIES are often used for this purpose but are
problematic for application developers due to their lack of
consistency and use as a free-form tag.
Linked: Entities can be linked to other entities such as vcards
through a URI and associated REL and FMTTYPE parameters.
1.1. Structured iCalendar relationships
The iCalendar [RFC5545] RELATED-TO property has no support for
temporal relationships as used by project management tools.
The RELTYPE parameter is extended to take new values defining
temporal relationships, a GAP parameter is defined to provide lead
and lag values, and RELATED-TO is extended to allow URI values.
These changes allow the RELATED-TO property to define a richer set of
relationships useful for project management.
1.2. Grouped iCalendar relationships
This specification defines a new REFID property which allows
arbitrary groups of entities to be associated with the same key
value.
REFID is used to identify a key allowing the association of
components that are all related to the referring, aggregating
component and the retrieval of components based on this key. For
example, this may be used to identify the tasks associated with a
given project without having to communicate the task structure of the
project. A further example is the grouping of all sub-tasks
associated with the delivery of a specific package in a package
delivery system.
As such, the presence of a REFID property imparts no meaning to the
component. It is merely a key to allow retrieval. This is distinct
from categorisation which, while allowing grouping also adds meaning
to the component to which it is attached.
1.3. Concept relationships
The name CONCEPT is used by the Simple Knowledge Organization System
defined in [W3C.REC-skos-reference-20090818]. The term "concept"
more accurately defines what we often mean by a category. It's not
the text string that is important but the meaning attached to it.
For example, the term "football" can mean very different sports.
Douglass Expires 23 September 2022 [Page 3]
Internet-Draft iCalendar Relationships March 2022
The introduction of CONCEPT allows a more structured approach to
categorization, with the possibility of namespaced and path-like
values. Unlike REFID the CONCEPT property imparts some meaning. It
is assumed that the value of this property will reference a well
defined category.
The current [RFC5545] CATEGORY property is used as a free form
'tagging' field. These values have some meaning to those who apply
them but not necessarily to any consumer. As such it is difficult to
establish formal relationships between components based on their
category.
Rather than attempt to add semantics to the CATEGORY property it
seems best to continue its usage as an informal tag and establish a
new CONCEPT property with more constraints.
1.4. Linked relationships
The currently existing iCalendar standard [RFC5545] lacks a general
purpose method for referencing additional, external information
relating to calendar components.
This document proposes a method for referencing typed external
information that can provide additional information about an
iCalendar component. This new LINK property is closely aligned to
[RFC8288] which defines the generic concept of Web Linking as well as
its expression in the HTTP LINK header field.
The LINK property defines a typed reference or relation to external
meta-data or related resources. By providing type and format
information as parameters, clients and servers are able to discover
interesting references and make use of them, perhaps for indexing or
the presentation of interesting links for the user.
Calendar components are often grouped into collections to represent a
calendar or a series of tasks, for example [RFC4791]' (CalDAV)
calendar collections.
It is also often necessary to reference calendar components in other
collections. For example, a VEVENT might refer to a VTODO from which
it was derived. The PARENT, SIBLING and CHILD relationships defined
for the RELATED-TO property only allow for a UID which is inadequate
for many purposes. Allowing other value types for those
relationships may help but would cause backward compatibility issues.
The LINK property can link components in different collections or
even on different servers.
Douglass Expires 23 September 2022 [Page 4]
Internet-Draft iCalendar Relationships March 2022
When publishing events it is useful to be able to refer back to the
source of that information. The actual event may have been consumed
from a feed or an ics file on a web site. A LINK property can
provide a reference to the originator of the event.
Beyond the need to relate elements temporally, project management
tools often need to be able to specify the relationships between the
various events and tasks which make up a project. The LINK property
provides such a mechanism.
The LINK property MUST NOT be treated as just another attachment.
The ATTACH property defined in [RFC5545] has been extended by
[RFC8607] to handle server-side management and stripping of inline
data and to provide additional data about the attachment (size,
filename etc).
Additionally clients may choose to handle attachments differently
from the LINK property as attachments are often an integral part of
the message - for example, the agenda.
1.5. Caching and offline use
In general, the calendar entity should be self explanatory without
the need to download referenced meta-data such as a web page.
However, to facilitate offline display the link type may identify
important pieces of data which should be downloaded in advance.
1.6. Conventions Used in This Document
The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT",
"SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "NOT RECOMMENDED", "MAY" and
"OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described in BCP
14 [RFC2119] [RFC8174] when, and only when, they appear in all
capitals, as shown here.
The notation used in this memo to (re-)define iCalendar elements is
the ABNF notation of [RFC5234] as used by [RFC5545]. Any syntax
elements shown below that are not explicitly defined in this
specification come from iCalendar [RFC5545].
2. LINK Property Reference Types
The reference value in the LINK property defined below can take three
forms specified by the VALUE parameter:
URI: This is a URI referring to the target.
Douglass Expires 23 September 2022 [Page 5]
Internet-Draft iCalendar Relationships March 2022
UID: This allows for linking within a single collection of calendar
components and the value MUST refer to another component within
the same collection.
XML-REFERENCE: In an XML environment it may be necessary to refer to
a fragment of an external XML artifact. This value is a URI with
an XPointer anchor value. The XPointer is defined in
[W3C.WD-xptr-xpointer-20021219] and its use as an anchor is
defined in [W3C.REC-xptr-framework-20030325]
Note that UID references may need updating on import. An example, is
data to be imported from a file containing VTODO and VEVENT
components with a VTODO referring to VEVENT components by UID. When
imported into a CalDAV system, the VTODO components are typically
placed in a different collection from the VEVENT components. This
would require the UID reference to be replaced with a URI.
3. Link Relation Types
[RFC8288] defines two forms of relation type: registered and
extension. Registered relation types are added to the Link Relations
registry as specified in Section 2.1.1 of [RFC8288]. Extension
relation types, defined in Section 2.1.2 of [RFC8288], are specified
as unique URIs that are not registered in the registry.
The relation types defined in Section 6.1 will be registered with
IANA in accordance with the specifications in [RFC8288].
4. New temporal RELTYPE Parameter values
This section defines the usual temporal relationships for use with
the RELTYPE parameter defined in Section 3.2.15 of [RFC5545]:
FINISHTOSTART, FINISHTOFINISH, STARTTOFINISH or STARTTOSTART.
The [RFC5545] RELATED-TO property with one or more of these temporal
relationships will be present in the predecessor entity and will
refer to the successor entity.
The GAP parameter (see Section 6.2) specifies the lead (a negative
value) or lag (a positive value) time between the predecessor and the
successor.
In the description of each temporal relationship below we refer to
Task-A, which contains and controls the relationship, and Task-B the
target of the relationship. This is indicated by the direction of
the arrow in the diagrams below.
Douglass Expires 23 September 2022 [Page 6]
Internet-Draft iCalendar Relationships March 2022
Also each relationship may be modified by the addition of a GAP
parameter to the relationship which applies to the targeted
component.
RELTYPE=FINISHTOSTART: Task-B cannot start until Task-A finishes.
For example, when painting is complete, carpet-laying can begin.
============
| Task-A |
============
|
V
============
| Task-B |
============
Figure 1: Finish to start relationship
RELTYPE=FINISHTOFINISH: Task-B can only be completed after Task-A is
finished. The related tasks may run in parallel before
completion.
For example, in the development of two related pieces of software,
e.g. the api and the implementation, the design of the
implementation (B) cannot be completed until the design of the api
(A) has been completed.
==================
| Task-A |--+
================== |
|
============ |
| Task-B |<-+
============
Figure 2: Finish to finish relationship
RELTYPE=STARTTOFINISH: The start of Task-A (which occurs after Task-
B) controls the finish of Task-B. For example, ticket sales
(Task-B) end after the game starts (Task-A).
============
+--| Task-A |
| ============
+---------+
============ |
| Task-B |<-+
============
Douglass Expires 23 September 2022 [Page 7]
Internet-Draft iCalendar Relationships March 2022
Figure 3: Start to finish relationship
RELTYPE=STARTTOSTART: The start of Task-A triggers the start of
Task-B, that is Task-B can start anytime after Task-A starts.
============
+--| Task-A |
| ============
|
| ============
+->| Task-B |
============
Figure 4: Start to start relationship
5. Additional New RELTYPE Parameter Values
This section defines the additional relationships below:
RELTYPE=FIRST: Indicates that the referenced calendar component is
the first in a series the referencing calendar component is part
of.
RELTYPE=NEXT: Indicates that the referenced calendar component is
the next in a series the referencing calendar component is part
of.
RELTYPE=DEPENDS-ON: Indicates that the current calendar component
depends on the referenced calendar component in some manner. For
example a task may be blocked waiting on the other, referenced,
task.
RELTYPE=REFID: Establishes a reference from the current component to
components with a REFID property which matches the value given in
the associated RELATED-TO property.
RELTYPE=CONCEPT: Establishes a reference from the current component
to components with a CONCEPT property which matches the value
given in the associated RELATED-TO property.
Note that the relationship types of PARENT, CHILD and SIBLING
establish a hierarchical relationship. The new types of FIRST and
NEXT are an ordering relationship.
6. New Property Parameters
Douglass Expires 23 September 2022 [Page 8]
Internet-Draft iCalendar Relationships March 2022
6.1. Link Relation
Parameter name: LINKREL
Purpose: To specify the relationship of data referenced by a LINK
property.
Format Definition: This parameter is defined by the following
notation:
linkrelparam = "LINKREL" "="
("SOURCE" ; Link to source of this component
/ DQUOTE uri DQUOTE
/ iana-token) ; Other IANA registered type
Description: This parameter MUST be specified on all LINK
properties, and defines the type of reference. This allows
programs consuming this data to automatically scan for references
they support. There is no default relation type.
In addition to the value defined here any link relation in the
link registry established by [RFC8288], or new link relations, may
be used.
It is expected that link relation types seeing significant usage
in calendaring will have the calendaring usage described in an
RFC.
LINKREL=SOURCE: identifies the source of the event information.
Registration: These relation types are registered in [RFC8288]
6.2. Gap
Parameter name: GAP
Purpose: To specify the length of the gap, positive or negative,
between two components with a temporal relationship.
Format Definition: This parameter is defined by the following
notation where dur-value is defined in section 3.3.6 of [RFC5545].
:
gapparam = "GAP" "=" dur-value
Description: This parameter MAY be specified on the RELATED-TO
Douglass Expires 23 September 2022 [Page 9]
Internet-Draft iCalendar Relationships March 2022
property, and defines the duration of time between the predecessor
and successor in an interval. When positive it defines the lag
time between a task and its logical successor. When negative it
defines the lead time.
An example of lag time might be if task A is "paint the room" and
task B is "lay the carpets" then task A may be related to task B
with RELTYPE=FINISHTOSTART with a gap of 1 day - long enough for
the paint to dry.
====================
| Paint the room |--+
==================== |
|(lag of one day)
|
| ===============
+->| lay carpet |
===============
Figure 5: Finish to start relationship with lag
For an example of lead time, in constructing a two storey building
the electrical work must be done before painting. However the
painter can move in to the first floor as the electricians move
upstairs.
=====================
| Electrical work |--+
===================== |
+-------------+
|(lead of estimated time)
| ==================
+->| Painting |
==================
Figure 6: Finish to start relationship with lead
7. New Value Data Types
This specification defines the following new value types to be used
with the VALUE property parameter:
UID VALUE=UID indicates that the associated value is the UID for a
component.
XML-REFERENCE VALUE=XML-REFERENCE indicates that the associated
Douglass Expires 23 September 2022 [Page 10]
Internet-Draft iCalendar Relationships March 2022
value references an associated XML artifact and is a URI with an
XPointer anchor value. The XPointer is defined in
[W3C.WD-xptr-xpointer-20021219] and its use as an anchor is
defined in [W3C.REC-xptr-framework-20030325].
8. New Properties
8.1. Concept
Property name: CONCEPT
Purpose: This property defines the formal categories for a calendar
component.
Value type: URI
Property Parameters: IANA, and non-standard parameters can be
specified on this property.
Conformance: This property can be specified zero or more times in
any iCalendar component.
Description: This property is used to specify formal categories or
classifications of the calendar component. The values are useful
in searching for a calendar component of a particular type and
category.
This categorization is distinct from the more informal "tagging"
of components provided by the existing CATEGORIES property. It is
expected that the value of the CONCEPT property will reference an
external resource which provides information about the
categorization.
In addition, a structured URI value allows for hierarchical
categorization of events.
Possible category resources are the various proprietary systems,
for example Library of Congress, or an open source of
categorisation data.
Format Definition: This property is defined by the following
notation:
concept = "CONCEPT" conceptparam ":"
uri CRLF
conceptparam = *(";" other-param)
Douglass Expires 23 September 2022 [Page 11]
Internet-Draft iCalendar Relationships March 2022
Example: The following is an example of this property. It points to
a server acting as the source for the calendar object.
CONCEPT:https://example.com/event-types/arts/music
8.2. Link
Property name: LINK
Purpose: This property provides a reference to external information
related to a component.
Value type: URI, UID or XML-REFERENCE
Property Parameters: The VALUE parameter is required. Non-standard,
link relation type, format type, label and language parameters can
also be specified on this property. The LABEL parameter is
defined in [RFC7986].
Conformance: This property can be specified zero or more times in
any iCalendar component.
Description: When used in a component the value of this property
points to additional information related to the component. For
example, it may reference the originating web server.
Format Definition: This property is defined by the following
notation:
link = "LINK" linkparam ":"
( uri / ; for VALUE=XML-REFERENCE
uri / ; for VALUE=URI
text ) ; for VALUE=UID
CRLF
linkparam = ; the elements herein may appear in any order,
; and the order is not significant.
(";" "VALUE" "=" ("XML-REFERENCE" /
"URI" /
"UID"))
1*(";" linkrelparam)
1*(";" fmttypeparam)
1*(";" labelparam)
1*(";" languageparam)
*(";" other-param)
Douglass Expires 23 September 2022 [Page 12]
Internet-Draft iCalendar Relationships March 2022
This property is a serialisation of the model in [RFC8288], where
the link target is carried in the property value, the link context
is the containing calendar entity, and the link relation type and
any target attributes are carried in iCalendar property
parameters.
The LINK property parameters map to [RFC8288] attributes as
follows:
LABEL: Maps to the "title" attribute defined in section 3.4.1 of
[RFC8288].
LANGUAGE: Maps to the "hreflang" attribute defined in section
3.4.1 of [RFC8288].
LINKREL: Maps to the link relation type defined in section 2.1 of
[RFC8288].
FMTTYPE: Maps to the "type" attribute defined in section 3.4.1 of
[RFC8288].
There is no mapping for [RFC8288] "title*", "anchor", "rev" or
"media".
Example: The following is an example of this property which provides
a reference to the source for the calendar object.
LINK;LINKREL=SOURCE;LABEL=Venue;VALUE=URI:
https://example.com/events
Example: The following is an example of this property which provides
a reference to an entity from which this one was derived. The
link relation is a vendor defined value.
LINK;LINKREL="https://example.com/linkrel/derivedFrom";
VALUE=URI:
https://example.com/tasks/01234567-abcd1234.ics
Example: The following is an example of this property which provides
a reference to a fragment of an XML document. The link relation
is a vendor defined value.
LINK;LINKREL="https://example.com/linkrel/costStructure";
VALUE=XML-REFERENCE:
https://example.com/xmlDocs/bidFramework.xml
#xpointer(descendant::CostStruc/range-to(
following::CostStrucEND[1]))
Douglass Expires 23 September 2022 [Page 13]
Internet-Draft iCalendar Relationships March 2022
8.3. Refid
Property name: REFID
Purpose: This property value acts as a key for associated iCalendar
entities.
Value type: TEXT
Property Parameters: Non-standard parameters can be specified on
this property.
Conformance: This property can be specified zero or more times in
any iCalendar component.
Description: The value of this property is free-form text that
creates an identifier for associated components. All components
that use the same REFID value are associated through that value
and can be located or retrieved as a group. For example, all of
the events in a travel itinerary would have the same REFID value,
so as to be grouped together.
Format Definition: This property is defined by the following
notation:
refid = "REFID" refidparam ":" text CRLF
refidparam = *(";" other-param)
The current link registry
Example: The following is an example of this property.
REFID:itinerary-2014-11-17
9. Updates to RFC 5545
This specification updates the RELATED-TO property defined in
Section 3.8.4.5 of [RFC5545]. The contents of Section 9.1 replace
that section.
The RELTYPE parameter is extended to take new values defining
temporal relationships, a GAP parameter is defined to provide lead
and lag values, and RELATED-TO is extended to allow URI values.
These changes allow the RELATED-TO property to define a richer set of
relationships useful for project management.
Douglass Expires 23 September 2022 [Page 14]
Internet-Draft iCalendar Relationships March 2022
9.1. RELATED-TO
Property Name: RELATED-TO
Purpose: This property is used to represent a relationship or
reference between one calendar component and another. The
definition here extends the definition in Section 3.8.4.5 of
[RFC5545] by allowing URI or UID values and a GAP parameter.
Value Type: URI, UID or TEXT
Property Parameters: Relationship type, IANA and non-standard
property parameters can be specified on this property.
Conformance: This property MAY be specified in any iCalendar
component.
Description: By default or when VALUE=UID is specified, the property
value consists of the persistent, globally unique identifier of
another calendar component. This value would be represented in a
calendar component by the "UID" property.
By default, the property value points to another calendar
component that has a PARENT relationship to the referencing
object. The "RELTYPE" property parameter is used to either
explicitly state the default PARENT relationship type to the
referenced calendar component or to override the default PARENT
relationship type and specify either a CHILD or SIBLING
relationship or a temporal relationship.
The PARENT relationship indicates that the calendar component is a
subordinate of the referenced calendar component. The CHILD
relationship indicates that the calendar component is a superior
of the referenced calendar component. The SIBLING relationship
indicates that the calendar component is a peer of the referenced
calendar component.
To preserve backwards compatibility the value type MUST be UID
when the PARENT, SIBLING or CHILD relationships are specified.
The FINISHTOSTART, FINISHTOFINISH, STARTTOFINISH or STARTTOSTART
relationships define temporal relationships as specified in the
reltype parameter definition.
The FIRST and NEXT define ordering relationships between calendar
components.
The DEPENDS-ON relationship indicates that the current calendar
Douglass Expires 23 September 2022 [Page 15]
Internet-Draft iCalendar Relationships March 2022
component depends on the referenced calendar component in some
manner. For example a task may be blocked waiting on the other,
referenced, task.
The REFID and CONCEPT relationships establish a reference from the
current component to the referenced component.
Changes to a calendar component referenced by this property can
have an implicit impact on the related calendar component. For
example, if a group event changes its start or end date or time,
then the related, dependent events will need to have their start
and end dates changed in a corresponding way. Similarly, if a
PARENT calendar component is cancelled or deleted, then there is
an implied impact to the related CHILD calendar components. This
property is intended only to provide information on the
relationship of calendar components.
Deletion of the target component, for example the target of a
FIRST, NEXT or temporal relationship can result in broken links.
It is up to the target calendar system to maintain any property
implications of these relationships.
Format Definition: This property is defined by the following
notation:
related = "RELATED-TO" relparam ":"
( text / ; for VALUE=UID
uri / ; for VALUE=URI
text ) ; for VALUE=TEXT or default
CRLF
relparam = ; the elements herein may appear in any order,
; and the order is not significant.
[";" "VALUE" "=" ("UID" /
"URI" /
"TEXT")]
[";" reltypeparam]
[";" gapparam]
*(";" other-param)
Example: The following are examples of this property.
Douglass Expires 23 September 2022 [Page 16]
Internet-Draft iCalendar Relationships March 2022
RELATED-TO:jsmith.part7.19960817T083000.xyzMail@example.com
RELATED-TO:19960401-080045-4000F192713-0052@example.com
RELATED-TO;VALUE=URI;RELTYPE=STARTTOFINISH:
https://example.com/caldav/user/jb/cal/
19960401-080045-4000F192713.ics
10. Security Considerations
All of the security considerations of section 7 pf [RFC5545] apply to
this specification.
Applications using the LINK property need to be aware of the risks
entailed in using the URIs provided as values. See section 7 of
[RFC3986] for a discussion of the security considerations relating to
URIs.
In particular note section 7.1 "Reliability and Consistency" of
[RFC3986] which points out the lack of a stability guarantee for
referenced resources.
When the value is an XML-REFERENCE type the targeted data is an XML
document or portion thereof. Consumers need to be aware of the
security issues related to XML processing - in particular those
related to XML entities. See [RFC4918] - Section 20.6. Additionally
note that the reference may be invalid or become so over time.
The CONCEPT and redefined RELATED-TO property have the same issues in
that values may be URIs.
Extremely large values for the GAP parameter may lead to unexpected
behavior.
11. IANA Considerations
11.1. iCalendar Property Registrations
The following iCalendar property names have been added to the
iCalendar Properties Registry defined in Section 8.3.2 of [RFC5545].
IANA has also added a reference to this document where the properties
originally defined in [RFC5545] have been updated by this document.
Douglass Expires 23 September 2022 [Page 17]
Internet-Draft iCalendar Relationships March 2022
+============+=========+========================+
| Property | Status | Reference |
+============+=========+========================+
| CONCEPT | Current | Section 8.1 |
+------------+---------+------------------------+
| LINK | Current | Section 8.2 |
+------------+---------+------------------------+
| REFID | Current | Section 8.3 |
+------------+---------+------------------------+
| RELATED-TO | Current | [RFC5545], Section 9.1 |
+------------+---------+------------------------+
Table 1
11.2. iCalendar Property Parameter Registrations
The following iCalendar property parameter names have been added to
the iCalendar Parameters Registry defined in Section 8.3.3 of
[RFC5545].
+===========+=========+=============+
| Parameter | Status | Reference |
+===========+=========+=============+
| GAP | Current | Section 6.2 |
+-----------+---------+-------------+
| LINKREL | Current | Section 6.1 |
+-----------+---------+-------------+
Table 2
11.3. iCalendar Value Data Type Registrations
The following iCalendar property parameter names have been added to
the iCalendar Value Data Types Registry defined in Section 8.3.4 of
[RFC5545].
+=================+=========+===========+
| Value Data Type | Status | Reference |
+=================+=========+===========+
| XML-REFERENCE | Current | Section 7 |
+-----------------+---------+-----------+
| UID | Current | Section 7 |
+-----------------+---------+-----------+
Table 3
Douglass Expires 23 September 2022 [Page 18]
Internet-Draft iCalendar Relationships March 2022
11.4. iCalendar RELTYPE Value Registrations
The following iCalendar "RELTYPE" values have been added to the
iCalendar Relationship Types Registry defined in Section 8.3.8 of
[RFC5545].
+===================+=========+===========+
| Relationship Type | Status | Reference |
+===================+=========+===========+
| CONCEPT | Current | Section 5 |
+-------------------+---------+-----------+
| DEPENDS-ON | Current | Section 5 |
+-------------------+---------+-----------+
| FINISHTOFINISH | Current | Section 4 |
+-------------------+---------+-----------+
| FINISHTOSTART | Current | Section 4 |
+-------------------+---------+-----------+
| FIRST | Current | Section 5 |
+-------------------+---------+-----------+
| NEXT | Current | Section 5 |
+-------------------+---------+-----------+
| REFID | Current | Section 5 |
+-------------------+---------+-----------+
| STARTTOFINISH | Current | Section 4 |
+-------------------+---------+-----------+
| STARTTOSTART | Current | Section 4 |
+-------------------+---------+-----------+
Table 4
11.5. New Reference Type Registration
The following link relation values have been added to the Reference
Types Registry defined in Section 6.2.2 of [RFC8288].
+========+=========+=============+
| Name | Status | Reference |
+========+=========+=============+
| SOURCE | Current | Section 6.1 |
+--------+---------+-------------+
Table 5
Douglass Expires 23 September 2022 [Page 19]
Internet-Draft iCalendar Relationships March 2022
12. Acknowledgements
The author would like to thank the members of CalConnect, the
Calendaring and Scheduling Consortium technical committees and the
following individuals for contributing their ideas, support and
comments:
Adrian Apthorp, Cyrus Daboo, Marten Gajda, Ken Murchison
The author would also like to thank CalConnect, the Calendaring and
Scheduling Consortium for advice with this specification.
13. References
13.1. Informative References
[RFC4791] Daboo, C., Desruisseaux, B., and L. Dusseault,
"Calendaring Extensions to WebDAV (CalDAV)", RFC 4791,
DOI 10.17487/RFC4791, March 2007,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc4791>.
[RFC8607] Daboo, C., Quillaud, A., and K. Murchison, Ed.,
"Calendaring Extensions to WebDAV (CalDAV): Managed
Attachments", RFC 8607, DOI 10.17487/RFC8607, June 2019,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8607>.
13.2. Normative References
[RFC2119] Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate
Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119,
DOI 10.17487/RFC2119, March 1997,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc2119>.
[RFC3986] Berners-Lee, T., Fielding, R., and L. Masinter, "Uniform
Resource Identifier (URI): Generic Syntax", STD 66,
RFC 3986, DOI 10.17487/RFC3986, January 2005,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc3986>.
[RFC4918] Dusseault, L., Ed., "HTTP Extensions for Web Distributed
Authoring and Versioning (WebDAV)", RFC 4918,
DOI 10.17487/RFC4918, June 2007,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc4918>.
[RFC5234] Crocker, D., Ed. and P. Overell, "Augmented BNF for Syntax
Specifications: ABNF", STD 68, RFC 5234,
DOI 10.17487/RFC5234, January 2008,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc5234>.
Douglass Expires 23 September 2022 [Page 20]
Internet-Draft iCalendar Relationships March 2022
[RFC5545] Desruisseaux, B., Ed., "Internet Calendaring and
Scheduling Core Object Specification (iCalendar)",
RFC 5545, DOI 10.17487/RFC5545, September 2009,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc5545>.
[RFC7986] Daboo, C., "New Properties for iCalendar", RFC 7986,
DOI 10.17487/RFC7986, October 2016,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7986>.
[RFC8174] Leiba, B., "Ambiguity of Uppercase vs Lowercase in RFC
2119 Key Words", BCP 14, RFC 8174, DOI 10.17487/RFC8174,
May 2017, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8174>.
[RFC8288] Nottingham, M., "Web Linking", RFC 8288,
DOI 10.17487/RFC8288, October 2017,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8288>.
[W3C.REC-skos-reference-20090818]
Miles, A. and S. Bechhofer, "SKOS Simple Knowledge
Organization System Reference", World Wide Web Consortium
Recommendation REC-skos-reference-20090818, 18 August
2009,
<https://www.w3.org/TR/2009/REC-skos-reference-20090818>.
[W3C.REC-xptr-framework-20030325]
Grosso, P., Maler, E., Marsh, J., and N. Walsh, "XPointer
Framework", World Wide Web Consortium Recommendation REC-
xptr-framework-20030325, 25 March 2003,
<https://www.w3.org/TR/2003/REC-xptr-framework-20030325>.
[W3C.WD-xptr-xpointer-20021219]
DeRose, S., Daniel, R., and E. Maler, "XPointer xpointer()
Scheme", World Wide Web Consortium WD WD-xptr-xpointer-
20021219, 19 December 2002,
<http://www.w3.org/TR/2002/WD-xptr-xpointer-20021219>.
Author's Address
Michael Douglass
Bedework
226 3rd Street
Troy, NY 12180
United States of America
Email: mdouglass@bedework.com
URI: https://bedework.com
Douglass Expires 23 September 2022 [Page 21]
