Internet DRAFT - draft-ietf-dnsop-rfc6304bis
draft-ietf-dnsop-rfc6304bis
Network Working Group J. Abley
Internet-Draft Dyn, Inc.
Obsoletes: 6304 (if approved) W. Sotomayor
Intended status: Informational OttIX
Expires: August 18, 2015 February 14, 2015
AS112 Nameserver Operations
draft-ietf-dnsop-rfc6304bis-06
Abstract
Many sites connected to the Internet make use of IPv4 addresses that
are not globally unique. Examples are the addresses designated in
RFC 1918 for private use within individual sites.
Devices in such environments may occasionally originate Domain Name
System (DNS) queries (so-called "reverse lookups") corresponding to
those private-use addresses. Since the addresses concerned have only
local significance, it is good practice for site administrators to
ensure that such queries are answered locally. However, it is not
uncommon for such queries to follow the normal delegation path in the
public DNS instead of being answered within the site.
It is not possible for public DNS servers to give useful answers to
such queries. In addition, due to the wide deployment of private-use
addresses and the continuing growth of the Internet, the volume of
such queries is large and growing. The AS112 project aims to provide
a distributed sink for such queries in order to reduce the load on
the corresponding authoritative servers. The AS112 project is named
after the Autonomous System Number (ASN) that was assigned to it.
This document describes the steps required to install a new AS112
node and offers advice relating to such a node's operation.
This document obsoletes RFC6304.
Status of This Memo
This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the
provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79.
Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering
Task Force (IETF). Note that other groups may also distribute
working documents as Internet-Drafts. The list of current Internet-
Drafts is at http://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/.
Abley & Sotomayor Expires August 18, 2015 [Page 1]
Internet-Draft AS112 Nameserver Operations February 2015
Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months
and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any
time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference
material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."
This Internet-Draft will expire on August 18, 2015.
Copyright Notice
Copyright (c) 2015 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the
document authors. All rights reserved.
This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal
Provisions Relating to IETF Documents
(http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of
publication of this document. Please review these documents
carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect
to this document. Code Components extracted from this document must
include Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of
the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as
described in the Simplified BSD License.
Table of Contents
1. NOTE TO RFC EDITOR AND REVIEWERS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
2. Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
3. AS112 DNS Service . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
3.1. Approach . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
3.1.1. Direct Delegation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
3.1.2. DNAME Redirection . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
3.2. Zones . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
3.3. Nameservers . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
4. Installation of a New Node . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
4.1. Useful Background Knowledge . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
4.2. Topological Location . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
4.3. Operating System and Host Considerations . . . . . . . . 7
4.4. Routing Software . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
4.5. DNS Software . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
4.6. Testing a Newly Installed Node . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15
5. Operations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15
5.1. Monitoring . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15
5.2. Downtime . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15
5.3. Statistics and Measurement . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16
6. Communications . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16
7. On the Future of AS112 Nodes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16
8. IANA Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17
8.1. General . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17
8.2. IANA Actions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18
Abley & Sotomayor Expires August 18, 2015 [Page 2]
Internet-Draft AS112 Nameserver Operations February 2015
8.2.1. IPv6 Transport for Direct Delegation AS112 Servers . 18
8.2.2. Registration in the Special-Purpose AS Numbers
Registry . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18
8.2.3. Registration in the IANA IPv4 Special-Purpose
Address Registry . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18
8.2.4. Registration in the IANA IPv6 Special-Purpose
Address Registry . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19
9. Security Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19
10. Acknowledgements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20
11. References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20
11.1. Normative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20
11.2. Informative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21
11.3. URIs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22
Appendix A. A Brief History of AS112 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22
Appendix B. Changes Since RFC 6304 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23
Appendix C. Revision History and Venue . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23
C.1. draft-jabley-dnsop-rfc6304bis-00 . . . . . . . . . . . . 23
C.2. draft-ietf-dnsop-rfc6304bis-00 . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23
C.3. draft-ietf-dnsop-rfc6304bis-01 . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23
C.4. draft-ietf-dnsop-rfc6304bis-02 . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24
C.5. draft-ietf-dnsop-rfc6304bis-03 . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24
C.6. draft-ietf-dnsop-rfc6304bis-04 . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24
C.7. draft-ietf-dnsop-rfc6304bis-05 . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24
C.8. draft-ietf-dnsop-rfc6304bis-06 . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25
Authors' Addresses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25
1. NOTE TO RFC EDITOR AND REVIEWERS
This document uses the phrases "TBA-prefix-v4" and "TBA-prefix-v6" in
anticipation of the address assignments requested in the IANA
Considerations section of [I-D.ietf-dnsop-as112-dname].
"TBA-address-v4" refers to the address within TBA-prefix-v4 assigned
to the nameserver BLACKHOLE.AS112.ARPA. Similarly, "TBA-address-v6"
refers to the corresponding address within TBA-prefix-v6.
All of "TBA-prefix-v4", "TBA-address-v4", "TBA-prefix-v6" and "TBA-
address-v6" in this document should be replaced with their assigned
values prior to publication.
The delegation of the AS112.ARPA zone is specified (and requested) in
[I-D.ietf-dnsop-as112-dname].
See Appendix C for an abridged revision history, and discussion of an
appropriate venue for discussion.
This section should be removed prior to publication.
Abley & Sotomayor Expires August 18, 2015 [Page 3]
Internet-Draft AS112 Nameserver Operations February 2015
2. Introduction
Many sites connected to the Internet make use of IPv4 addresses that
are not globally unique. Examples are the addresses designated in
[RFC1918] for private use within individual sites.
Devices in such environments may occasionally originate Domain Name
System (DNS) [RFC1034] queries (so-called "reverse lookups")
corresponding to those private-use addresses. Since the addresses
concerned have only local significance, it is good practice for site
administrators to ensure that such queries are answered locally
[RFC6303]. However, it is not uncommon for such queries to follow
the normal delegation path in the public DNS instead of being
answered within the site.
It is not possible for public DNS servers to give useful answers to
such queries. In addition, due to the wide deployment of private-use
addresses and the continuing growth of the Internet, the volume of
such queries is large and growing. The AS112 project aims to provide
a distributed sink for such queries in order to reduce the load on
the IN-ADDR.ARPA authoritative servers [RFC5855].
The AS112 project encompasses a loosely coordinated collection of
independently operated nameservers. Each nameserver functions as a
single node in an AS112 anycast cloud [RFC4786], and is configured to
answer authoritatively for a particular set of nominated zones.
The AS112 project is named after the Autonomous System Number (ASN)
that was assigned to it (see Appendix A).
3. AS112 DNS Service
3.1. Approach
3.1.1. Direct Delegation
The AS112 Project currently uses an approach whereby zones whose
traffic should be directed towards an AS112 sink should be directly
delegated to AS112 nameservers. Correspondingly, each AS112 node is
manually configured to answer appropriately for those zones.
The guidance in this document describes this capability for the zones
that were originally delegated in this fashion. AS112 nodes that
were implemented in accordance with the guidance found here will
continue to provide service for those zones.
Abley & Sotomayor Expires August 18, 2015 [Page 4]
Internet-Draft AS112 Nameserver Operations February 2015
3.1.2. DNAME Redirection
[I-D.ietf-dnsop-as112-dname] describes a different approach whereby
queries towards specific zones are redirected to an empty zone also
hosted on AS112 servers, using DNAME [RFC6672].
The guidance in this document introduces this capability, allowing
any zone administrator to sink query traffic in AS112 infrastructure
without requiring changes to any AS112 node.
3.2. Zones
To support Direct Delegation AS112 service, AS112 name nameservers
answer authoritatively for the following zones, corresponding to
[RFC1918] private-use netblocks:
o 10.IN-ADDR.ARPA
o 16.172.IN-ADDR.ARPA, 17.172.IN-ADDR.ARPA, ..., 31.172.IN-ADDR.ARPA
o 168.192.IN-ADDR.ARPA
and the following zone, corresponding to the "link local" netblock
169.254.0.0/16 listed in [RFC6890]:
o 254.169.IN-ADDR.ARPA
To support DNAME Redirection AS112 service, AS112 name servers answer
authoritatively for the following zone, as specified in
[I-D.ietf-dnsop-as112-dname]:
o EMPTY.AS112.ARPA
To aid identification of AS112 anycast nodes, each node also answers
authoritatively for the following zones:
o HOSTNAME.AS112.NET
o HOSTNAME.AS112.ARPA
See Section 4.5 for the recommended contents of all these zones.
3.3. Nameservers
To support Direct Delegation AS112 service, the relevant zones listed
in Section 3.2 are delegated to the two nameservers BLACKHOLE-
1.IANA.ORG (192.175.48.6, 2620:4f:8000::6) and BLACKHOLE-2.IANA.ORG
(192.175.48.42, 2620:4f:8000::42).
Abley & Sotomayor Expires August 18, 2015 [Page 5]
Internet-Draft AS112 Nameserver Operations February 2015
Additionally, the server PRISONER.IANA.ORG (192.175.48.1,
2620:4f:8000::1) is listed in the MNAME field of the SOA records of
the IN-ADDR.ARPA zones served by AS112 name servers.
PRISONER.IANA.ORG receives mainly dynamic update queries.
The addresses of all these nameservers are covered by the single IPv4
prefix 192.175.48.0/24 and the IPv6 prefix 2620:4f:8000::/48. To
date, IPv6 transport for these nameservers has only been available
for pre-production testing. Direction to the IANA to add AAAA RRSets
for the owner names of these nameservers can be found in Section 8.
To support DNAME Redirection AS112 service, the single zone
EMPTY.AS112.ARPA is delegated to the single nameserver
BLACKHOLE.AS112.ARPA (TBA-address-v4, TBA-address-v6). The addresses
of that nameserver are covered by the single IPv4 prefix TBA-prefix-
v4, and the single IPv6 prefix TBA-prefix-v6.
4. Installation of a New Node
4.1. Useful Background Knowledge
Installation of an AS112 node is relatively straightforward.
However, experience in the following general areas may prove useful:
o inter-domain routing with BGP [RFC4271];
o DNS authoritative server operations; and,
o anycast [RFC4786] distribution of DNS services.
4.2. Topological Location
AS112 nodes may be located anywhere on the Internet. For nodes that
are intended to provide a public service to the Internet community
(as opposed to private use), it may well be advantageous to choose a
location that is easily (and cheaply) reachable by multiple
providers, such as an Internet Exchange Point.
AS112 nodes may advertise their service prefix to BGP peers for local
use (analogous to a conventional peering relationship between two
providers) or for global use (analogous to a customer relationship
with one or more providers).
It is good operational practice to notify the community of users that
may fall within the reach of a new AS112 node before it is installed.
At an Internet Exchange, local mailing lists usually exist to
facilitate such announcements. For nodes that are intended to be
Abley & Sotomayor Expires August 18, 2015 [Page 6]
Internet-Draft AS112 Nameserver Operations February 2015
globally reachable, coordination with other AS112 operators is highly
recommended. See also Section 6.
4.3. Operating System and Host Considerations
Examples in this document are based on UNIX and UNIX-like operating
systems, but other operating systems exist that are suitable for use
in construction of an AS112 node.
The chosen platform should include either support for cloned loopback
interfaces or the capability to bind multiple addresses to a single
loopback interface. The addresses of the nameservers listed in
Section 3.3 will be configured on these interfaces in order that the
DNS software can respond to queries properly.
A host that is configured to act as an AS112 anycast node should be
dedicated to that purpose and should not be used to simultaneously
provide other services. This guidance is provided due to the
unpredictable (and occasionally high) traffic levels that AS112 nodes
have been seen to attract.
System startup scripts should be arranged such that the various
AS112-related components start automatically following a system
reboot. The order in which interfaces are configured and software
components started should be arranged such that routing software
startup follows DNS software startup, and DNS software startup
follows loopback interface configuration.
Wrapper scripts or other arrangements should be employed to ensure
that the anycast service prefix for AS112 is not advertised while
either the anycast addresses are not configured or the DNS software
is not running.
4.4. Routing Software
AS112 nodes signal the availability of AS112 nameservers to the
Internet using BGP [RFC4271]: each AS112 node is a BGP speaker and
announces the prefixes 192.175.48.0/24 and 2620:4f:8000::/48 to the
Internet with origin AS 112 (see also Section 3.3).
The examples in this document are based on the Quagga Routing Suite
[1] running on Linux, but other software packages exist which also
provide suitable BGP support for AS112 nodes.
The "bgpd.conf" file is used by Quagga's bgpd daemon, which provides
BGP support. The router ID in this example is 203.0.113.1; the AS112
node peers with external peers 192.0.2.1, 192.0.2.2, 2001:db8::1 and
2001:db8::2. Note the local AS number is 112, and the service
Abley & Sotomayor Expires August 18, 2015 [Page 7]
Internet-Draft AS112 Nameserver Operations February 2015
prefixes originated from the AS112 node to support Direct Delegation
service are 192.175.48.0/24 and 2620:4f:8000::/48; the IPv4 prefix
TBA-prefix-v4 and the IPv6 prefix TBA-prefix-v6 support DNAME
Redirection.
For clarity, an IPv4-only AS112 node need not configure any of the
IPv6 elements that follow; similarly, an IPv6-only AS112 node need
not configure any of the IPv4 elements. Such single-stack hosts can
still contribute usefully to IPv4 and IPv6 AS112 services, however,
and single-stack operation is not discouraged.
! bgpd.conf
!
hostname as112-bgpd
password <something>
enable password <supersomething>
!
! Note that all AS112 nodes use the local Autonomous System Number
! 112, and originate the IPv4 prefixes 192.175.48.0/24 and
! TBA-prefix-v4 and the IPv6 prefixes 2620:4f:8000::/48 and
! TBA-prefix-v6.
!
! All other addresses shown below are illustrative, and
! actual numbers will depend on local circumstances.
!
! IPv4-only or IPv6-only AS112 nodes should omit advertisements
! for address families they do not support.
!
router bgp 112
bgp router-id 203.0.113.1
neighbor 192.0.2.1 remote-as 64496
neighbor 192.0.2.1 next-hop-self
neighbor 192.0.2.1 prefix-list AS112-v4 out
neighbor 192.0.2.1 filter-list 1 out
!
neighbor 192.0.2.2 remote-as 64497
neighbor 192.0.2.2 next-hop-self
neighbor 192.0.2.2 prefix-list AS112-v4 out
neighbor 192.0.2.2 filter-list 1 out
!
neighbor 2001:db8::1 remote-as 64498
neighbor 2001:db8::1 next-hop-self
neighbor 2001:db8::1 prefix-list AS112-v6 out
neighbor 2001:db8::1 filter-list 1 out
!
neighbor 2001:db8::2 remote-as 64499
neighbor 2001:db8::2 next-hop-self
neighbor 2001:db8::2 prefix-list AS112-v6 out
Abley & Sotomayor Expires August 18, 2015 [Page 8]
Internet-Draft AS112 Nameserver Operations February 2015
neighbor 2001:db8::2 filter-list 1 out
!
network 192.175.48.0/24
network TBA-prefix-v4
!
address-family ipv6 unicast
network 2620:4f:8000::/48
network TBA-prefix-v6
exit-address-family
!
ip prefix-list AS112-v4 permit 192.175.48.0/24
ip prefix-list AS112-v4 permit TBA-prefix-v4
!
ipv6 prefix-list AS112-v6 permit 2620:4f:8000::/48
ipv6 prefix-list AS112-v6 permit TBA-prefix-v6
!
ip as-path access-list 1 permit ^$
The configuration above includes two restrictions on what the AS112
should advertise to its BGP neighbours: a prefix filter that permits
only the service prefixes, and an AS_PATH filter that matches only
locally-originated routes. Together, these measures prevent the node
from becoming a transit point for its adjacent ASes.
The "zebra.conf" file is required to provide integration between
protocol daemons (bgpd, in this case) and the kernel.
! zebra.conf
!
hostname as112
password <something>
enable password <supersomething>
!
interface lo
!
interface eth0
!
4.5. DNS Software
Although the queries received by AS112 nodes are definitively
misdirected, it is important that they be answered in a manner that
is accurate and consistent. For this reason, AS112 nodes operate as
fully functional and standards-compliant DNS authoritative servers
[RFC1034], and hence require appropriate DNS software.
Abley & Sotomayor Expires August 18, 2015 [Page 9]
Internet-Draft AS112 Nameserver Operations February 2015
Examples in this document are based on ISC BIND9 [2], but other DNS
software exists that is suitable for use in construction of an AS112
node.
The following is a sample BIND9 "named.conf" file for a dedicated
AS112 server. Note that the nameserver is configured to act as an
authoritative-only server (i.e., recursion is disabled). The
nameserver is also configured to listen on the various AS112 anycast
nameserver addresses, as well as its local addresses.
A basic logging example is included in the sample as well. AS112
operators may exercise discretion at the amount of logging detail
they desire or the type of logging they may use in the maintenance of
their node. The detail of information can then be used to single-out
bad implementors, badly managed nameservers or for simple measurement
analysis.
// named.conf
// Global options
options {
listen-on {
127.0.0.1; // localhost
// The following address is node-dependent and should be set to
// something appropriate for the new AS112 node.
203.0.113.1; // local address (globally unique, unicast)
// The following addresses are used to support Direct Delegation
// AS112 service, and are the same for all AS112 nodes.
192.175.48.1; // prisoner.iana.org (anycast)
192.175.48.6; // blackhole-1.iana.org (anycast)
192.175.48.42; // blackhole-2.iana.org (anycast)
// The following address is used to support DNAME Redirection
// AS112 service, and is the same for all AS112 nodes.
TBA-address-v4; // blackhole.as112.arpa (anycast)
};
listen-on-v6 {
::1; // localhost
// The following addresses are used to support Direct Delegation
// AS112 service, and are the same for all AS112 nodes.
Abley & Sotomayor Expires August 18, 2015 [Page 10]
Internet-Draft AS112 Nameserver Operations February 2015
2620:4f:8000::1; // prisoner.iana.org (anycast)
2620:4f:8000::6; // blackhole-1.iana.org (anycast)
2620:4f:8000::42; // blackhole-2.iana.org (anycast)
// The following address is used to support DNAME Redirection
// AS112 service, and is the same for all AS112 nodes.
TBA-address-v6; // blackhole.as112.arpa (anycast)
};
directory "/var/named";
recursion no; // authoritative-only server
};
// Log queries, so that when people call us about unexpected
// answers to queries they didn't realise they had sent, we
// have something to talk about. Note that activating this
// naively has the potential to create high CPU load and consume
// enormous amounts of disk space. This example retains 2 old
// versions at a maximum of 500MB each before rotating out the
// oldest one.
logging {
channel "querylog" {
file "/var/log/query.log" versions 2 size 500m;
print-time yes;
};
category queries { querylog; };
};
// Direct Delegation AS112 Service
// RFC 1918
zone "10.in-addr.arpa" { type master; file "db.dd-empty"; };
zone "16.172.in-addr.arpa" { type master; file "db.dd-empty"; };
zone "17.172.in-addr.arpa" { type master; file "db.dd-empty"; };
zone "18.172.in-addr.arpa" { type master; file "db.dd-empty"; };
zone "19.172.in-addr.arpa" { type master; file "db.dd-empty"; };
zone "20.172.in-addr.arpa" { type master; file "db.dd-empty"; };
zone "21.172.in-addr.arpa" { type master; file "db.dd-empty"; };
zone "22.172.in-addr.arpa" { type master; file "db.dd-empty"; };
zone "23.172.in-addr.arpa" { type master; file "db.dd-empty"; };
zone "24.172.in-addr.arpa" { type master; file "db.dd-empty"; };
zone "25.172.in-addr.arpa" { type master; file "db.dd-empty"; };
zone "26.172.in-addr.arpa" { type master; file "db.dd-empty"; };
zone "27.172.in-addr.arpa" { type master; file "db.dd-empty"; };
zone "28.172.in-addr.arpa" { type master; file "db.dd-empty"; };
Abley & Sotomayor Expires August 18, 2015 [Page 11]
Internet-Draft AS112 Nameserver Operations February 2015
zone "29.172.in-addr.arpa" { type master; file "db.dd-empty"; };
zone "30.172.in-addr.arpa" { type master; file "db.dd-empty"; };
zone "31.172.in-addr.arpa" { type master; file "db.dd-empty"; };
zone "168.192.in-addr.arpa" { type master; file "db.dd-empty"; };
// RFC 6890
zone "254.169.in-addr.arpa" { type master; file "db.dd-empty"; };
// DNAME Redirection AS112 Service
zone "empty.as112.arpa" { type master; file "db.dr-empty"; };
// Also answer authoritatively for the HOSTNAME.AS112.NET and
// HOSTNAME.AS112.ARPA zones, which contains data of operational
// relevance.
zone "hostname.as112.net" {
type master;
file "db.hostname.as112.net";
};
zone "hostname.as112.arpa" {
type master;
file "db.hostname.as112.arpa";
};
The "db.dd-empty" file follows, below. This is the source data used
to populate all the IN-ADDR.ARPA zones listed in Section 3.2 that
support Direct Delegation AS112 service. Note that the RNAME
specified in the SOA record corresponds to hostmaster@root-
servers.org, a suitable email address for receiving technical queries
about these zones.
Abley & Sotomayor Expires August 18, 2015 [Page 12]
Internet-Draft AS112 Nameserver Operations February 2015
; db.dd-empty
;
; Empty zone for Direct Delegation AS112 service.
;
$TTL 1W
@ IN SOA prisoner.iana.org. hostmaster.root-servers.org. (
1 ; serial number
1W ; refresh
1M ; retry
1W ; expire
1W ) ; negative caching TTL
;
NS blackhole-1.iana.org.
NS blackhole-2.iana.org.
;
; There should be no other resource records included in this zone.
;
; Records that relate to RFC 1918-numbered resources within the
; site hosting this AS112 node should not be hosted on this
; nameserver.
The "db.dr-empty" file follows below. This is the source data used
to populate the EMPTY.AS112.ARPA zone that supports DNAME Redirection
AS112 service. Note that the RNAME specified in the SOA record
corresponds to noc@dns.icann.org, a suitable email address for
technical queries about this zone.
; db.dr-empty
;
; Empty zone for Direct Delegation AS112 service.
;
$TTL 1W
@ IN SOA blackhole.as112.arpa. noc.dns.icann.org. (
1 ; serial number
1W ; refresh
1M ; retry
1W ; expire
1W ) ; negative caching TTL
;
NS blackhole.as112.arpa.
;
; There should be no other resource records included in this zone.
;
; Records that relate to RFC 1918-numbered resources within the
; site hosting this AS112 node should not be hosted on this
; nameserver.
Abley & Sotomayor Expires August 18, 2015 [Page 13]
Internet-Draft AS112 Nameserver Operations February 2015
The "db.hostname.as112.net" and "db.hostname.as112.arpa" files
follow, below. These zones contain various resource records that
provide operational data to users for troubleshooting or measurement
purposes; the data should be edited to suit local circumstances.
Note that the responses to the queries "HOSTNAME.AS112.NET IN TXT"
and "HOSTNAME.AS112.ARPA IN TXT" should fit within a 512 octet DNS/
UDP datagram: i.e., it should be available over UDP transport without
requiring EDNS0 support by the client.
The optional LOC record [RFC1876] included in each zone apex provides
information about the geospatial location of the node.
; db.hostname.as112.net
;
$TTL 1W
@ SOA server.example.net. admin.example.net. (
1 ; serial number
1W ; refresh
1M ; retry
1W ; expire
1W ) ; negative caching TTL
;
NS blackhole-1.iana.org.
NS blackhole-2.iana.org.
;
TXT "Name of Facility or similar" "City, Country"
TXT "See http://www.as112.net/ for more information."
TXT "Unique IP: 203.0.113.1."
;
LOC 45 25 0.000 N 75 42 0.000 W 80.00m 1m 10000m 10m
; db.hostname.as112.arpa
;
$TTL 1W
@ SOA server.example.net. admin.example.net. (
1 ; serial number
1W ; refresh
1M ; retry
1W ; expire
1W ) ; negative caching TTL
;
NS blackhole.as112.arpa.
;
TXT "Name of Facility or similar" "City, Country"
TXT "See http://www.as112.net/ for more information."
;
LOC 45 25 0.000 N 75 42 0.000 W 80.00m 1m 10000m 10m
Abley & Sotomayor Expires August 18, 2015 [Page 14]
Internet-Draft AS112 Nameserver Operations February 2015
4.6. Testing a Newly Installed Node
The BIND9 tool "dig" can be used to retrieve the TXT resource records
associated with the names "HOSTNAME.AS112.NET" and
"HOSTNAME.AS112.ARPA", directed at one of the AS112 anycast
nameserver addresses. Continuing the example from above, the
response received should indicate the identity of the AS112 node that
responded to the query. See Section 4.5 for more details about the
resource records associated with "HOSTNAME.AS112.NET".
% dig @prisoner.iana.org hostname.as112.net txt +short +norec
"Name of Facility or similar" "City, Country"
"See http://www.as112.net/ for more information."
%
If the response received indicates a different node is being used,
then there is probably a routing problem to solve. If there is no
response received at all, there might be a host or nameserver
problem. Judicious use of tools such as traceroute and consultation
of BGP looking glasses might be useful in troubleshooting.
Note that an appropriate set of tests for a new server will include
queries sent from many different places within the expected service
area of the node, using both UDP and TCP transport, and exercising
all three AS112 anycast nameserver addresses.
5. Operations
5.1. Monitoring
AS112 nodes should be monitored to ensure they are functioning
correctly, just as with any other production service. An AS112 node
that stops answering queries correctly can cause failures and
timeouts in unexpected places and can lead to failures in dependent
systems that can be difficult to troubleshoot.
5.2. Downtime
An AS112 node that needs to go off-line (e.g., for planned
maintenance or as part of the diagnosis of some problem) should stop
advertising the AS112 service prefixes to its BGP peers. This can be
done by shutting down the routing software on the node altogether or
by causing the routing system to withdraw the route.
Withdrawing the service prefixes is important in order to avoid
blackholing query traffic in the event that the DNS software on the
node is not functioning normally.
Abley & Sotomayor Expires August 18, 2015 [Page 15]
Internet-Draft AS112 Nameserver Operations February 2015
5.3. Statistics and Measurement
Use of the AS112 node should be measured in order to track long-term
trends, identify anomalous conditions, and ensure that the
configuration of the AS112 node is sufficient to handle the query
load.
Examples of free monitoring tools that might be useful to operators
of AS112 nodes include:
o bindgraph [3]
o dnstop [4]
o DSC [5]
Operators of AS112 nodes should also consider participating in
collection events as part of a larger, co-ordinated effort to gather
important baselines. One example of such an effort is Day-in-the-
Life [6] coordinated by the DNS-OARC [7].
6. Communications
It is good operational practice to notify the community of users that
may fall within the reach of a new AS112 node before it is installed.
At Internet Exchanges, local mailing lists usually exist to
facilitate such announcements.
For nodes that are intended to be globally reachable, coordination
with other AS112 operators is especially recommended. The mailing
list [8] is operated for this purpose.
Information pertinent to AS112 operations is maintained at [9].
Information about an AS112 node should also be published within the
DNS, within the "HOSTNAME.AS112.NET" and "HOSTNAME.AS112.ARPA" zones.
See Section 4.5 for more details.
AS112 operators should also be aware of the measures described in
[RFC6305] and direct site administrators appropriately.
7. On the Future of AS112 Nodes
It is recommended practice for the operators of recursive nameservers
to answer queries for zones served by AS112 nodes locally, such that
queries never have an opportunity to reach AS112 servers [RFC6303].
Operational experience with AS112 nodes does not currently indicate
Abley & Sotomayor Expires August 18, 2015 [Page 16]
Internet-Draft AS112 Nameserver Operations February 2015
an observable trend towards compliance with those recommendations,
however.
It is expected that some DNS software vendors will include default
configuration that will implement measures such as those described in
[RFC6303]. If such software is widely deployed, it is reasonable to
assume that the query load received by AS112 nodes will decrease;
however, it is safe to assume that the query load will not decrease
to zero, and consequently that AS112 nodes will continue to provide a
useful service for the foreseeable future.
The use of DNAME Redirection to provide AS112 service is new, and
hence is informed by minimal operational experience. The use of
DNAME means that queries for many source zones could be redirected to
AS112 infrastructure with no real opportunity for coordination.
If the DNAME Redirection approach is successful, and in the absence
of any operational concerns, the community might well recommend the
retirement of the original Direct Delegation AS112 service. This
document makes no such recommendation, however.
8. IANA Considerations
8.1. General
The nameservers associated with Direct Delegation AS112 service are
all named under the domain IANA.ORG (see Section 3.3). However, the
anycast infrastructure itself is operated by a loosely-coordinated,
diverse mix of organisations across the Internet, and is not an IANA
function.
The autonomous system number 112, the IPv4 prefix 192.175.48.0/24 and
the IPv6 prefix 2620:4f:8000::/48 were assigned by ARIN.
The IPv4 prefix TBA-prefix-v4 and the IPv6 prefix TBA-prefix-v6, used
for DNAME Redirection AS112 service, were assigned by the IANA
[I-D.ietf-dnsop-as112-dname].
The three nameservers BLACKHOLE-1.IANA.ORG, BLACKHOLE-2.IANA.ORG and
PRISONER.IANA.ORG are also reachable over IPv6, as described in
Section 3.3. Following a substantial period of pre-production
testing by AS112 operators, the IANA is directed to add AAAA RRSets
to those owner names in Section 8.2.1, to allow the servers to
receive queries and generate responses over IPv6 transport.
Abley & Sotomayor Expires August 18, 2015 [Page 17]
Internet-Draft AS112 Nameserver Operations February 2015
8.2. IANA Actions
8.2.1. IPv6 Transport for Direct Delegation AS112 Servers
The IANA is directed to add the following AAAA resource records for
the three Direct Delegation AS112 nameservers named under IANA.ORG:
+----------------------+------------------+
| Owner Name | AAAA RDATA |
+----------------------+------------------+
| PRISONER.IANA.ORG | 2620:4f:8000::1 |
| | |
| BLACKHOLE-1.IANA.ORG | 2620:4f:8000::6 |
| | |
| BLACKHOLE-2.IANA.ORG | 2620:4f:8000::42 |
+----------------------+------------------+
8.2.2. Registration in the Special-Purpose AS Numbers Registry
The IANA is directed to add AS112 to the "Special-Purpose AS Numbers"
registry specified in [RFC7249] as follows:
AS Numbers: 112
Reason for Reservation: Used by the AS112 project to sink
misdirected DNS queries; see [THIS DOCUMENT]
8.2.3. Registration in the IANA IPv4 Special-Purpose Address Registry
The IANA is directed to add 192.175.48.0/24 to the "IANA IPv4
Special-Purpose Address Registry" specified in [RFC6890] as follows:
Address Block: 192.175.48.0/24
Name: Direct Delegation AS112 Service
RFC: [THIS DOCUMENT]
Allocation Date: 1996-01-05
Termination Date: N/A
Source: True
Destination: True
Forwardable: True
Abley & Sotomayor Expires August 18, 2015 [Page 18]
Internet-Draft AS112 Nameserver Operations February 2015
Global: True
Reserved-by-Protocol: False
8.2.4. Registration in the IANA IPv6 Special-Purpose Address Registry
The IANA is directed to add 2620:4f:8000::/48 to the "IANA IPv6
Special-Purpose Address Registry" specified in [RFC6890] as follows:
Address Block: 2620:4f:8000::/48
Name: Direct Delegation AS112 Service
RFC: [THIS DOCUMENT]
Allocation Date: 2011-05-31
Termination Date: N/A
Source: True
Destination: True
Forwardable: True
Global: True
Reserved-by-Protocol: False
9. Security Considerations
Hosts should never normally send queries to AS112 servers; queries
relating to private-use addresses should be answered locally within a
site. Hosts that send queries to AS112 servers may well leak
information relating to private infrastructure to the public network,
and this could present a security risk. Additionally, AS112
operators may log this information making it further subject to
whatever security and privacy risks that might entail. These risks
are orthogonal to the presence or absence of authoritative servers
for these zones in the public DNS infrastructure, however.
Queries that are answered by AS112 servers are usually unintentional;
it follows that the responses from AS112 servers are usually
unexpected. Unexpected inbound traffic can trigger intrusion
detection systems or alerts by firewalls. Operators of AS112 servers
should be prepared to be contacted by operators of remote
infrastructure who believe their security has been violated. Advice
to those who mistakenly believe that responses from AS112 nodes
Abley & Sotomayor Expires August 18, 2015 [Page 19]
Internet-Draft AS112 Nameserver Operations February 2015
constitute an attack on their infrastructure can be found in
[RFC6305].
The deployment of AS112 nodes is very loosely coordinated compared to
other services distributed using anycast. The malicious compromise
of an AS112 node and subversion of the data served by the node are
hence more difficult to detect due to the lack of central management.
Since it is conceivable that changing the responses to queries
received by AS112 nodes might influence the behaviour of the hosts
sending the queries, such a compromise might be used as an attack
vector against private infrastructure.
Operators of AS112 should take appropriate measures to ensure that
AS112 nodes are appropriately protected from compromise, such as
would normally be employed for production nameserver or network
infrastructure. The guidance provided for root nameservers in
[RFC2870] may be instructive.
The zones hosted by AS112 servers are not signed with DNSSEC
[RFC4033]. Given the distributed and loosely coordinated structure
of the AS112 service, the zones concerned could only be signed if the
private key material used was effectively public, obviating any
security benefit resulting from the use of those keys.
10. Acknowledgements
This document benefited from review and suggestions from Leo Vegoda
and Pearl Liang.
The authors wish to acknowledge the assistance of Bill Manning, John
Brown, Marco D'Itri, Daniele Arena, Stephane Bortzmeyer, Frank
Habicht, Chris Thompson, Peter Losher, Peter Koch, Alfred Hoenes, S.
Moonesamy, Mehmet Akcin and Aleksi Suhonen in the preparation of
[RFC6304], which this document supercedes.
11. References
11.1. Normative References
[I-D.ietf-dnsop-as112-dname]
Abley, J., Dickson, B., Kumari, W., and G. Michaelson,
"AS112 Redirection using DNAME", draft-ietf-dnsop-
as112-dname-03 (work in progress), March 2014.
[RFC1034] Mockapetris, P., "Domain names - concepts and facilities",
STD 13, RFC 1034, November 1987.
Abley & Sotomayor Expires August 18, 2015 [Page 20]
Internet-Draft AS112 Nameserver Operations February 2015
[RFC1918] Rekhter, Y., Moskowitz, R., Karrenberg, D., Groot, G., and
E. Lear, "Address Allocation for Private Internets", BCP
5, RFC 1918, February 1996.
[RFC2870] Bush, R., Karrenberg, D., Kosters, M., and R. Plzak, "Root
Name Server Operational Requirements", BCP 40, RFC 2870,
June 2000.
[RFC4033] Arends, R., Austein, R., Larson, M., Massey, D., and S.
Rose, "DNS Security Introduction and Requirements", RFC
4033, March 2005.
[RFC4271] Rekhter, Y., Li, T., and S. Hares, "A Border Gateway
Protocol 4 (BGP-4)", RFC 4271, January 2006.
[RFC4786] Abley, J. and K. Lindqvist, "Operation of Anycast
Services", BCP 126, RFC 4786, December 2006.
11.2. Informative References
[RFC1876] Davis, C., Vixie, P., Goodwin, T., and I. Dickinson, "A
Means for Expressing Location Information in the Domain
Name System", RFC 1876, January 1996.
[RFC5855] Abley, J. and T. Manderson, "Nameservers for IPv4 and IPv6
Reverse Zones", BCP 155, RFC 5855, May 2010.
[RFC6303] Andrews, M., "Locally Served DNS Zones", BCP 163, RFC
6303, July 2011.
[RFC6304] Abley, J. and W. Maton, "AS112 Nameserver Operations", RFC
6304, July 2011.
[RFC6305] Abley, J. and W. Maton, "I'm Being Attacked by
PRISONER.IANA.ORG!", RFC 6305, July 2011.
[RFC6672] Rose, S. and W. Wijngaards, "DNAME Redirection in the
DNS", RFC 6672, June 2012.
[RFC6890] Cotton, M., Vegoda, L., Bonica, R., and B. Haberman,
"Special-Purpose IP Address Registries", BCP 153, RFC
6890, April 2013.
[RFC7249] Housley, R., "Internet Numbers Registries", RFC 7249, May
2014.
Abley & Sotomayor Expires August 18, 2015 [Page 21]
Internet-Draft AS112 Nameserver Operations February 2015
11.3. URIs
[1] http://www.quagga.net/
[2] http://www.isc.org/software/BIND/
[3] http://www.linux.it/~md/software/
[4] http://dns.measurement-factory.com/tools/dnstop/
[5] http://dns.measurement-factory.com/tools/dsc/
[6] https://www.dns-oarc.net/oarc/data/ditl/
[7] https://www.dns-oarc.net/
[8] mailto:as112-ops@lists.dns-oarc.net
[9] http://www.as112.net/
Appendix A. A Brief History of AS112
Widespread use of the private address blocks listed in [RFC1918]
followed that document's publication in 1996. At that time the IN-
ADDR.ARPA zone was served by root servers.
The idea of off-loading IN-ADDR.ARPA queries relating to [RFC1918]
addresses from the root nameservers was first proposed by Bill
Manning and John Brown.
The use of anycast for distributing authoritative DNS service for
[RFC1918] IN-ADDR.ARPA zones was subsequently proposed at a private
meeting of root server operators.
ARIN provided an IPv4 prefix for the anycast service and also the
autonomous system number 112 for use in originating that prefix.
This assignment gave the project its name.
In 2002, the first AS112 anycast nodes were deployed.
In 2011, the IN-ADDR.ARPA zone was redelegated from the root servers
to a new set of servers operated independently by AfriNIC, APNIC,
ARIN, ICANN, LACNIC, and the RIPE NCC and named according to
[RFC5855].
[RFC6304], the precursor to this document, was published in July
2011.
Abley & Sotomayor Expires August 18, 2015 [Page 22]
Internet-Draft AS112 Nameserver Operations February 2015
The use of anycast nameservers in the AS112 project contributed to
the operational experience of anycast DNS services, and it can be
seen as a precursor to the anycast distribution of other
authoritative DNS servers in subsequent years (e.g., various root
servers).
Appendix B. Changes Since RFC 6304
A number of changes and enhancements to the AS112 service has been
introduced since the publication of [RFC6304].
o The addition of IPv6 transport.
o The extension of the AS112 service to include the ability to have
additional zones delegated for sinking or removed using the DNAME
resource record.
o Requisite changes to the guidance regarding the configuration of
current and future AS112 nodes.
o Further clarification about the leakage of information in the
Security Considerations section.
o A direction to the IANA to register the AS112 Project's prefixes
in the IANA Special-Purpose Address Registries.
Appendix C. Revision History and Venue
A suitable venue for discussion of this document is the dnsop working
group. Private comments may also be directed at the authors.
This section (and sub-sections) should be removed prior to
publication.
C.1. draft-jabley-dnsop-rfc6304bis-00
Initial revision of [RFC6304] intended to provide guidance consistent
with [I-D.ietf-dnsop-as112-dname].
C.2. draft-ietf-dnsop-rfc6304bis-00
Change of filename following working group adoption.
C.3. draft-ietf-dnsop-rfc6304bis-01
Correct "Obsoletes" header in document metadata from "RFC6304" to
"6304" as requested by Tim Wicinski.
Abley & Sotomayor Expires August 18, 2015 [Page 23]
Internet-Draft AS112 Nameserver Operations February 2015
C.4. draft-ietf-dnsop-rfc6304bis-02
Add IPv6 details for Direct Delegation AS112 service, including IANA
considerations to add AAAA RRs to PRISONER.IANA.ORG and friends.
Add IANA considerations that will add AS112 to the "Special-Purpose
AS Numbers" registry, as created in [RFC7249].
Merge in some AUTH48 changes from RFC6304 that had been overlooked.
C.5. draft-ietf-dnsop-rfc6304bis-03
Change reference from RFC 5735 to RFC 6890.
C.6. draft-ietf-dnsop-rfc6304bis-04
Add change section for -03 that was previously overlooked.
Register IPv4 netblock in IANA special-use registry.
Register IPv6 netblock in IANA special-use registry.
Modify registration data for AS112 in corresponding special-use
registry.
Add shout-out to Pearl and Leo.
C.7. draft-ietf-dnsop-rfc6304bis-05
As per IESG review and a replay of the same comment made by Pete
Resnick of the review of the draft of RFC 6304, switch from
Informational to Best Current Practice.
Amend the abstract slightly to shorten it and re-state second-last
paragraph as if RFC 6304 neever existed.
Amend AS112 DNS Service section slightly to remove references to RFC
6304 and make this a little more standalone.
Add a paragraph about logging.
Expand the first paragraph in the Security Considerations section to
include a word on the logging of such leaked information.
Add mention about further measurement and analysis contribution
through the DNS-OARC.
Add another reference to RFC 6305 in Communication section.
Abley & Sotomayor Expires August 18, 2015 [Page 24]
Internet-Draft AS112 Nameserver Operations February 2015
Add some more missing changes suggested during RFC 6304 AUTH48 phase.
Re-sync some more language with RFC 6304 after another edit round
post-AUTH48 that was missing from the current draft.
Expand the TXT record return to include info about the unique IP of
the AS112 node.
Add shout-out to Aleksi Suhonen.
C.8. draft-ietf-dnsop-rfc6304bis-06
As per WG Chairs, switch from Best Current Practice to Informational.
Authors' Addresses
Joe Abley
Dyn, Inc.
470 Moore Street
London, ON N6C 2C2
Canada
Phone: +1 519 670 9327
Email: jabley@dyn.com
William F. Maton Sotomayor
Ottawa Internet Exchange
Constitution Square
1400-340 Albert Street
Ottawa, ON K1R 0A5
Canada
Email: wmaton@ottix.net
Abley & Sotomayor Expires August 18, 2015 [Page 25]
