Internet DRAFT - draft-ietf-i2nsf-nsf-facing-interface-dm
draft-ietf-i2nsf-nsf-facing-interface-dm
I2NSF Working Group J. Kim, Ed.
Internet-Draft J. Jeong, Ed.
Intended status: Standards Track Sungkyunkwan University
Expires: 3 December 2022 J. Park
ETRI
S. Hares
Q. Lin
Huawei
1 June 2022
I2NSF Network Security Function-Facing Interface YANG Data Model
draft-ietf-i2nsf-nsf-facing-interface-dm-29
Abstract
This document defines a YANG data model for configuring security
policy rules on Network Security Functions (NSF) in the Interface to
Network Security Functions (I2NSF) framework. The YANG data model in
this document is for the NSF-Facing Interface between a Security
Controller and NSFs in the I2NSF framework. It is built on the basis
of the YANG data model in the I2NSF Capability YANG Data Model
document for the I2NSF framework.
Status of This Memo
This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the
provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79.
Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering
Task Force (IETF). Note that other groups may also distribute
working documents as Internet-Drafts. The list of current Internet-
Drafts is at https://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/.
Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months
and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any
time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference
material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."
This Internet-Draft will expire on 3 December 2022.
Copyright Notice
Copyright (c) 2022 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the
document authors. All rights reserved.
Kim, et al. Expires 3 December 2022 [Page 1]
Internet-Draft NSF-Facing Interface YANG Data Model June 2022
This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal
Provisions Relating to IETF Documents (https://trustee.ietf.org/
license-info) in effect on the date of publication of this document.
Please review these documents carefully, as they describe your rights
and restrictions with respect to this document. Code Components
extracted from this document must include Revised BSD License text as
described in Section 4.e of the Trust Legal Provisions and are
provided without warranty as described in the Revised BSD License.
Table of Contents
1. Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
2. Terminology . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
3. YANG Tree Diagram . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
3.1. General I2NSF Security Policy Rule . . . . . . . . . . . 3
3.2. Event Clause . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
3.3. Condition Clause . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
3.4. Action Clause . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12
4. YANG Data Model of NSF-Facing Interface . . . . . . . . . . . 14
4.1. YANG Module of NSF-Facing Interface . . . . . . . . . . . 14
5. XML Configuration Examples of Low-Level Security Policy
Rules . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 62
5.1. Example Security Requirement 1: Block Social Networking
Service (SNS) Access during Business Hours . . . . . . . 62
5.2. Example Security Requirement 2: Block Malicious VoIP/VoCN
Packets Coming to a Company . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 66
5.3. Example Security Requirement 3: Mitigate HTTP and HTTPS
Flood Attacks on a Company Web Server . . . . . . . . . . 69
6. IANA Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 72
7. Security Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 72
8. References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 73
8.1. Normative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 73
8.2. Informative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 78
Appendix A. Acknowledgments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 79
Appendix B. Contributors . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 79
Appendix C. Changes from
draft-ietf-i2nsf-nsf-facing-interface-dm-28 . . . . . . . 80
Authors' Addresses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 80
1. Introduction
This document defines a YANG [RFC6020][RFC7950] data model for
security policy rule configuration of Network Security Functions
(NSF). The YANG data model in this document is based on the data
model described in [I-D.ietf-i2nsf-capability-data-model] for the
NSF-Facing Interface in the Interface to Network Security Functions
(I2NSF) architecture [RFC8329]. The YANG data model in this document
focuses on security policy configuration for the NSFs discussed in
Kim, et al. Expires 3 December 2022 [Page 2]
Internet-Draft NSF-Facing Interface YANG Data Model June 2022
[I-D.ietf-i2nsf-capability-data-model], i.e., generic NSF (operate on
packet header for layer 2, layer3, and layer 4) and advanced NSF
(Intrusion Prevention System, URL-Filtering, anti-DDoS, Antivirus,
and VoIP/VoCN Filter). Note: VoIP is an abbreviation for Voice over
Internet Protocol and VoCN is an abbreviation for Voice over Cellular
Network, such as Voice over LTE or 5G.
This YANG data model uses an "Event-Condition-Action" (ECA) policy
model that is used as the basis for the design of I2NSF Policy
described in [RFC8329] and [I-D.ietf-i2nsf-capability-data-model].
The "ietf-i2nsf-nsf-facing-interface" YANG module defined in this
document provides the configuration of the following features.
* A security policy rule of a network security function.
* An event clause of a generic network security function.
* A condition clause of a generic network security function.
* An action clause of a generic network security function.
2. Terminology
The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT",
"SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "NOT RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and
"OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described in BCP
14 [RFC2119] [RFC8174] when, and only when, they appear in all
capitals, as shown here.
This document uses the terminology described in [RFC8329].
This document follows the guidelines of [RFC8407], uses the common
YANG types defined in [RFC6991], and adopts the Network Management
Datastore Architecture (NMDA) [RFC8342]. The meaning of the symbols
in tree diagrams is defined in [RFC8340].
3. YANG Tree Diagram
This section shows a YANG tree diagram of policy for network security
functions.
3.1. General I2NSF Security Policy Rule
This section shows a YANG tree diagram for a general I2NSF security
policy rule for generic network security functions.
Kim, et al. Expires 3 December 2022 [Page 3]
Internet-Draft NSF-Facing Interface YANG Data Model June 2022
module: ietf-i2nsf-nsf-facing-interface
+--rw i2nsf-security-policy* [name]
+--rw name string
+--rw language? string
+--rw priority-usage? identityref
+--rw resolution-strategy? identityref
+--rw default-action? identityref
+--rw rules* [name]
| +--rw name string
| +--rw description? string
| +--rw priority? uint8
| +--rw enable? boolean
| +--rw long-connection
| | +--rw enable? boolean
| | +--rw duration? uint32
| +--rw event
| | ...
| +--rw condition
| | ...
| +--rw action
| ...
+--rw rule-group
+--rw groups* [group-name]
+--rw group-name string
+--rw rule-name* -> ../../../rules/name
+--rw enable? boolean
+--rw description? string
Figure 1: YANG Tree Diagram for Network Security Policy
A security policy is used by one virtual instance of an NSF/device as
a set of security rules to protect assets from major risk factors
that threaten the system. There can be multiple security policies in
a single NSF to provide the necessary protection. The security
policy includes its name, language tag, priority usage, resolution
strategy, default action, and rules.
The language field indicates the language tag that is used for the
natural language text that is included in all of the 'description'
attributes. The language field is encoded following the rules in
Section 2.1 of [RFC5646]. The default language tag is "en-US".
A resolution strategy is used to decide how to resolve conflicts that
occur between the actions of the same or different policy rules that
are matched and contained in a particular NSF. The resolution
strategy is defined as First Matching Rule (FMR), Last Matching Rule
(LMR), Prioritized Matching Rule (PMR) with Errors (PMRE), and
Prioritized Matching Rule with No Errors (PMRN). The resolution
Kim, et al. Expires 3 December 2022 [Page 4]
Internet-Draft NSF-Facing Interface YANG Data Model June 2022
strategy can be extended according to specific vendor action
features. The resolution strategy is described in detail in
[I-D.ietf-i2nsf-capability-data-model].
A default action is used to execute I2NSF policy rule when no rule
matches a packet. The default action can be pass, drop, reject,
rate-limit, or mirror actions. The default action can be extended
according to specific vendor action features. The default action is
described in detail in [I-D.ietf-i2nsf-capability-data-model].
The rules include rule name, rule description, rule priority, rule
enable, event, condition, and action.
3.2. Event Clause
This section shows a YANG tree diagram for an event clause for a
general I2NSF security policy rule for generic network security
functions.
module: ietf-i2nsf-nsf-facing-interface
+--rw i2nsf-security-policy* [name]
...
+--rw rules* [name]
| ...
| +--rw event
| | +--rw description? string
| | +--rw system-event* identityref
| | +--rw system-alarm* identityref
| +--rw condition
| | ...
| +--rw action
| ...
+--rw rule-group
...
Figure 2: YANG Tree Diagram for an Event Clause
An event clause is any important occurrence at a specific time of a
change in the system being managed, and/or in the environment of the
system being managed. An event clause is used to trigger the
evaluation of the condition clause of the I2NSF Policy Rule. The
event clause is defined as a system event, system alarm
[I-D.ietf-i2nsf-nsf-monitoring-data-model], and time. The event
clause can be extended according to specific vendor event features.
The event clause is described in detail in
[I-D.ietf-i2nsf-capability-data-model].
Kim, et al. Expires 3 December 2022 [Page 5]
Internet-Draft NSF-Facing Interface YANG Data Model June 2022
3.3. Condition Clause
This section shows a YANG tree diagram for a condition clause for a
general I2NSF security policy rule for generic network security
functions.
module: ietf-i2nsf-nsf-facing-interface
+--rw i2nsf-security-policy* [name]
...
+--rw rules* [name]
| ...
| +--rw event
| | ...
| +--rw condition
| | +--rw description? string
| | +--rw layer-2* [destination-mac-address source-mac-address
ethertype]
| | | +--rw description? string
| | | +--rw destination-mac-address yang:mac-address
| | | +--rw destination-mac-address-mask? yang:mac-address
| | | +--rw source-mac-address yang:mac-address
| | | +--rw source-mac-address-mask? yang:mac-address
| | | +--rw ethertype eth:ethertype
| | +--rw (layer-3)?
| | | +--:(ipv4)
| | | | +--rw ipv4
| | | | +--rw description? string
| | | | +--rw dscp? inet:dscp
| | | | +--rw ecn? uint8
| | | | +--rw length? uint16
| | | | +--rw ttl? uint8
| | | | +--rw protocol? uint8
| | | | +--rw ihl? uint8
| | | | +--rw flags? bits
| | | | +--rw offset? uint16
| | | | +--rw identification? uint16
| | | | +--rw (destination-network)?
| | | | | +--:(destination-ipv4-network)
| | | | | | +--rw destination-ipv4-network?
inet:ipv4-prefix
| | | | | +--:(destination-ipv4-range)
| | | | | +--rw destination-ipv4-range* [start end]
| | | | | +--rw start inet:ipv4-address-no-zone
| | | | | +--rw end inet:ipv4-address-no-zone
| | | | +--rw (source-network)?
| | | | +--:(source-ipv4-network)
| | | | | +--rw source-ipv4-network? inet:ipv4-prefix
Kim, et al. Expires 3 December 2022 [Page 6]
Internet-Draft NSF-Facing Interface YANG Data Model June 2022
| | | | +--:(source-ipv4-range)
| | | | +--rw source-ipv4-range* [start end]
| | | | +--rw start inet:ipv4-address-no-zone
| | | | +--rw end inet:ipv4-address-no-zone
| | | +--:(ipv6)
| | | +--rw ipv6
| | | +--rw description? string
| | | +--rw dscp? inet:dscp
| | | +--rw ecn? uint8
| | | +--rw length? uint16
| | | +--rw ttl? uint8
| | | +--rw protocol? uint8
| | | +--rw (destination-network)?
| | | | +--:(destination-ipv6-network)
| | | | | +--rw destination-ipv6-network?
inet:ipv6-prefix
| | | | +--:(destination-ipv6-range)
| | | | +--rw destination-ipv6-range* [start end]
| | | | +--rw start inet:ipv6-address-no-zone
| | | | +--rw end inet:ipv6-address-no-zone
| | | +--rw (source-network)?
| | | | +--:(source-ipv6-network)
| | | | | +--rw source-ipv6-network? inet:ipv6-prefix
| | | | +--:(source-ipv6-range)
| | | | +--rw source-ipv6-range* [start end]
| | | | +--rw start inet:ipv6-address-no-zone
| | | | +--rw end inet:ipv6-address-no-zone
| | | +--rw flow-label? inet:ipv6-flow-label
| | +--rw (layer-4)?
| | | +--:(tcp)
| | | | +--rw tcp
| | | | +--rw description? string
| | | | +--rw source-port-number
| | | | | +--rw (source-port)?
| | | | | +--:(range-or-operator)
| | | | | | +--rw (port-range-or-operator)?
| | | | | | +--:(range)
| | | | | | | +--rw lower-port inet:port-number
| | | | | | | +--rw upper-port inet:port-number
| | | | | | +--:(operator)
| | | | | | +--rw operator? operator
| | | | | | +--rw port inet:port-number
| | | | | +--:(port-list)
| | | | | +--rw port-numbers* [start end]
| | | | | +--rw start inet:port-number
| | | | | +--rw end inet:port-number
| | | | +--rw destination-port-number
| | | | | +--rw (destination-port)?
Kim, et al. Expires 3 December 2022 [Page 7]
Internet-Draft NSF-Facing Interface YANG Data Model June 2022
| | | | | +--:(range-or-operator)
| | | | | | +--rw (port-range-or-operator)?
| | | | | | +--:(range)
| | | | | | | +--rw lower-port inet:port-number
| | | | | | | +--rw upper-port inet:port-number
| | | | | | +--:(operator)
| | | | | | +--rw operator? operator
| | | | | | +--rw port inet:port-number
| | | | | +--:(port-list)
| | | | | +--rw port-numbers* [start end]
| | | | | +--rw start inet:port-number
| | | | | +--rw end inet:port-number
| | | | +--rw sequence-number? uint32
| | | | +--rw acknowledgement-number? uint32
| | | | +--rw data-offset? uint8
| | | | +--rw reserved? uint8
| | | | +--rw flags? bits
| | | | +--rw window-size? uint16
| | | | +--rw urgent-pointer? uint16
| | | | +--rw options? binary
| | | +--:(udp)
| | | | +--rw udp
| | | | +--rw description? string
| | | | +--rw source-port-number
| | | | | +--rw (source-port)?
| | | | | +--:(range-or-operator)
| | | | | | +--rw (port-range-or-operator)?
| | | | | | +--:(range)
| | | | | | | +--rw lower-port inet:port-number
| | | | | | | +--rw upper-port inet:port-number
| | | | | | +--:(operator)
| | | | | | +--rw operator? operator
| | | | | | +--rw port inet:port-number
| | | | | +--:(port-list)
| | | | | +--rw port-numbers* [start end]
| | | | | +--rw start inet:port-number
| | | | | +--rw end inet:port-number
| | | | +--rw destination-port-number
| | | | | +--rw (destination-port)?
| | | | | +--:(range-or-operator)
| | | | | | +--rw (port-range-or-operator)?
| | | | | | +--:(range)
| | | | | | | +--rw lower-port inet:port-number
| | | | | | | +--rw upper-port inet:port-number
| | | | | | +--:(operator)
| | | | | | +--rw operator? operator
| | | | | | +--rw port inet:port-number
| | | | | +--:(port-list)
Kim, et al. Expires 3 December 2022 [Page 8]
Internet-Draft NSF-Facing Interface YANG Data Model June 2022
| | | | | +--rw port-numbers* [start end]
| | | | | +--rw start inet:port-number
| | | | | +--rw end inet:port-number
| | | | +--rw length? uint16
| | | +--:(sctp)
| | | | +--rw sctp
| | | | +--rw description? string
| | | | +--rw source-port-number
| | | | | +--rw (source-port)?
| | | | | +--:(range-or-operator)
| | | | | | +--rw (port-range-or-operator)?
| | | | | | +--:(range)
| | | | | | | +--rw lower-port inet:port-number
| | | | | | | +--rw upper-port inet:port-number
| | | | | | +--:(operator)
| | | | | | +--rw operator? operator
| | | | | | +--rw port inet:port-number
| | | | | +--:(port-list)
| | | | | +--rw port-numbers* [start end]
| | | | | +--rw start inet:port-number
| | | | | +--rw end inet:port-number
| | | | +--rw destination-port-number
| | | | | +--rw (destination-port)?
| | | | | +--:(range-or-operator)
| | | | | | +--rw (port-range-or-operator)?
| | | | | | +--:(range)
| | | | | | | +--rw lower-port inet:port-number
| | | | | | | +--rw upper-port inet:port-number
| | | | | | +--:(operator)
| | | | | | +--rw operator? operator
| | | | | | +--rw port inet:port-number
| | | | | +--:(port-list)
| | | | | +--rw port-numbers* [start end]
| | | | | +--rw start inet:port-number
| | | | | +--rw end inet:port-number
| | | | +--rw chunk-type* uint8
| | | | +--rw chunk-length? uint16
| | | +--:(dccp)
| | | | +--rw dccp
| | | | +--rw description? string
| | | | +--rw source-port-number
| | | | | +--rw (source-port)?
| | | | | +--:(range-or-operator)
| | | | | | +--rw (port-range-or-operator)?
| | | | | | +--:(range)
| | | | | | | +--rw lower-port inet:port-number
| | | | | | | +--rw upper-port inet:port-number
| | | | | | +--:(operator)
Kim, et al. Expires 3 December 2022 [Page 9]
Internet-Draft NSF-Facing Interface YANG Data Model June 2022
| | | | | | +--rw operator? operator
| | | | | | +--rw port inet:port-number
| | | | | +--:(port-list)
| | | | | +--rw port-numbers* [start end]
| | | | | +--rw start inet:port-number
| | | | | +--rw end inet:port-number
| | | | +--rw destination-port-number
| | | | | +--rw (destination-port)?
| | | | | +--:(range-or-operator)
| | | | | | +--rw (port-range-or-operator)?
| | | | | | +--:(range)
| | | | | | | +--rw lower-port inet:port-number
| | | | | | | +--rw upper-port inet:port-number
| | | | | | +--:(operator)
| | | | | | +--rw operator? operator
| | | | | | +--rw port inet:port-number
| | | | | +--:(port-list)
| | | | | +--rw port-numbers* [start end]
| | | | | +--rw start inet:port-number
| | | | | +--rw end inet:port-number
| | | | +--rw service-code* uint32
| | | | +--rw type* uint8
| | | | +--rw data-offset? uint8
| | | +--:(icmp)
| | | +--rw icmp
| | | +--rw description? string
| | | +--rw version? enumeration
| | | +--rw type? uint8
| | | +--rw code? uint8
| | | +--rw rest-of-header? binary
| | +--rw url-category
| | | +--rw description? string
| | | +--rw pre-defined* string
| | | +--rw user-defined* string
| | +--rw voice
| | | +--rw description? string
| | | +--rw source-voice-id* string
| | | +--rw destination-voice-id* string
| | | +--rw user-agent* string
| | +--rw ddos
| | | +--rw description? string
| | | +--rw alert-packet-rate? uint32
| | | +--rw alert-flow-rate? uint32
| | | +--rw alert-byte-rate? uint32
| | +--rw anti-virus
| | | +--rw profile* string
| | | +--rw exception-files* string
| | +--rw payload
Kim, et al. Expires 3 December 2022 [Page 10]
Internet-Draft NSF-Facing Interface YANG Data Model June 2022
| | | +--rw description? string
| | | +--rw content* binary
| | +--rw context
| | +--rw description? string
| | +--rw time
| | | +--rw start-date-time? yang:date-and-time
| | | +--rw end-date-time? yang:date-and-time
| | | +--rw period
| | | | +--rw start-time? time
| | | | +--rw end-time? time
| | | | +--rw day* day
| | | | +--rw date* int8
| | | | +--rw month* string
| | | +--rw frequency? enumeration
| | +--rw application
| | | +--rw description? string
| | | +--rw protocol* identityref
| | +--rw device-type
| | | +--rw description? string
| | | +--rw device* identityref
| | +--rw users
| | | +--rw description? string
| | | +--rw user* [id]
| | | | +--rw id uint32
| | | | +--rw name? string
| | | +--rw group* [id]
| | | +--rw id uint32
| | | +--rw name? string
| | +--rw geographic-location
| | +--rw description? string
| | +--rw source* string
| | +--rw destination* string
| +--rw action
| ...
+--rw rule-group
...
Figure 3: YANG Tree Diagram for a Condition Clause
A condition clause is defined as a set of attributes, features, and/
or values that are to be compared with a set of known attributes,
features, and/or values in order to determine whether the set of
actions in that (imperative) I2NSF policy rule can be executed or
not. A condition clause works with 'AND' logic, where all fields set
in the condition MUST match the packet or flow for the condition to
be evaluated as 'TRUE'. A condition clause is classified as a
Kim, et al. Expires 3 December 2022 [Page 11]
Internet-Draft NSF-Facing Interface YANG Data Model June 2022
condition of generic network security functions, advanced network
security functions, or context. A condition clause of generic
network security functions is defined as IPv4 condition, IPv6
condition, TCP condition, UDP condition, SCTP condition, DCCP
condition, or ICMP (ICMPv4 and ICMPv6) condition.
Note that the data model in this document does not focus on only IP
addresses, but focuses on all the fields of IPv4 and IPv6 headers.
The IPv4 and IPv6 headers have similarity with some different fields.
In this case, it is better to handle separately the IPv4 and IPv6
headers such that the different fields can be used to handle IPv4 and
IPv6 packets. Also, note that the YANG data model in this document
is based on the YANG Data Model for Network Access Control Lists
(ACLs) [RFC8519] that does not support IPv6 extension headers
including various options, the support of IPv6 extension headers is
left as future work.
The data model provides transport layer condition for TCP, UDP, SCTP,
and DCCP. With ICMPv4 and ICMPv6 are included as a choice for layer
4 as the header fields in ICMP are above the network layer. Note
that QUIC protocol [RFC9000] is excluded in the data model as it is
not considered in the initial I2NSF documents [RFC8329]. The QUIC
traffic should not be treated as UDP traffic and will be considered
in the future I2NSF documents.
A condition clause of advanced network security functions is defined
as url category condition, voice condition, DDoS condition, or
payload condition. A condition clause of context is defined as
application condition, target condition, users condition, and
geography condition.
Note that this document deals only with conditions of several
advanced network security functions such as url filter (i.e., web
filter), VoIP/VoCN security, and DDoS-attack mitigator. A condition
clause of other advanced network security functions such as Intrusion
Prevention System (IPS) and Data Loss Prevention (DLP) can be defined
as an extension in future. A condition clause can be extended
according to specific vendor condition features. A condition clause
is described in detail in [I-D.ietf-i2nsf-capability-data-model].
3.4. Action Clause
This section shows a YANG tree diagram for an action clause for a
general I2NSF security policy rule for generic network security
functions.
Kim, et al. Expires 3 December 2022 [Page 12]
Internet-Draft NSF-Facing Interface YANG Data Model June 2022
module: ietf-i2nsf-nsf-facing-interface
+--rw i2nsf-security-policy* [name]
...
+--rw rules* [name]
| ...
| +--rw event
| ...
| +--rw condition
| ...
| +--rw action
| +--rw description? string
| +--rw packet-action
| | +--rw ingress-action? identityref
| | +--rw egress-action? identityref
| | +--rw log-action? identityref
| +--rw flow-action
| | +--rw ingress-action? identityref
| | +--rw egress-action? identityref
| | +--rw log-action? identityref
| +--rw advanced-action
| +--rw content-security-control* identityref
| +--rw attack-mitigation-control* identityref
+--rw rule-group
...
Figure 4: YANG Tree Diagram for an Action Clause
An action is used to control and monitor aspects of flow-based NSFs
when the policy rule event and condition clauses are satisfied. NSFs
provide security services by executing various actions. The action
clause is defined as ingress action, egress action, or log action for
packet action, flow action, and advanced action for additional
inspection. The packet action is an action for an individual packet
such as an IP datagram as a stateless process that uses the packet's
header and payload. The flow action is an action of a traffic flow
such as the packets of a TCP session (e.g., an HTTP/HTTPS session) as
a stateful process that uses the traffic flow information such as
5-tuple information, packet counts, and byte counts. The advanced
action is an action for an advanced security service (e.g., url
filter, DDoS-attack mitigator, and VoIP/VoCN filter) for either a
packet or a traffic flow according to the intention of such an
advanced security service. The action clause can be extended
according to specific vendor action features. The action clause is
described in detail in [I-D.ietf-i2nsf-capability-data-model].
Kim, et al. Expires 3 December 2022 [Page 13]
Internet-Draft NSF-Facing Interface YANG Data Model June 2022
Note that an empty event clause means that the event boolean will
always evaluate to true and starts the evaluation of the condition
clause, while an empty condition clause means that the condition
boolean will always evaluate to false.
4. YANG Data Model of NSF-Facing Interface
The main objective of this document is to provide the YANG data model
of the I2NSF NSF-Facing Interface. This interface can be used to
deliver control and management messages between a Security Controller
and NSFs for the I2NSF low-level security policies.
This data model is designed to support the I2NSF framework that can
be extended according to the security needs. In other words, the
model design is independent of the content and meaning of specific
policies as well as the implementation approach.
With the YANG data model of I2NSF NSF-Facing Interface, this document
suggests use cases for security policy rules such as time-based
firewall, web filter, VoIP/VoCN security service, and DDoS-attack
mitigation in Section 5.
4.1. YANG Module of NSF-Facing Interface
This section describes a YANG module of NSF-Facing Interface. This
document provides identities in the data model for the configuration
of an NSF. The identity has the same concept with the corresponding
identity in [I-D.ietf-i2nsf-consumer-facing-interface-dm]. This YANG
module imports from [RFC6991] and [RFC8519]. It makes references to
[RFC0768] [RFC0791] [RFC0792] [RFC0854] [RFC0959] [RFC1939] [RFC2132]
[RFC2595] [RFC3261] [RFC3986] [RFC4250] [RFC4340] [RFC4443] [RFC4732]
[RFC4987] [RFC5321] [RFC5595] [RFC5646] [RFC6335] [RFC8075] [RFC8200]
[RFC8329] [RFC8335] [RFC9051] [RFC9179] [GLOB] [IEEE-802.3]
[ISO-3166] [I-D.ietf-httpbis-http2bis] [I-D.ietf-httpbis-messaging]
[I-D.ietf-httpbis-semantics] [I-D.ietf-i2nsf-capability-data-model]
[I-D.ietf-i2nsf-nsf-monitoring-data-model] [I-D.ietf-tcpm-rfc793bis]
[I-D.ietf-tsvwg-rfc4960-bis]
<CODE BEGINS> file "ietf-i2nsf-nsf-facing-interface@2022-06-01.yang"
module ietf-i2nsf-nsf-facing-interface {
yang-version 1.1;
namespace
"urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-i2nsf-nsf-facing-interface";
prefix
i2nsfnfi;
import ietf-inet-types {
prefix inet;
Kim, et al. Expires 3 December 2022 [Page 14]
Internet-Draft NSF-Facing Interface YANG Data Model June 2022
reference
"Section 4 of RFC 6991";
}
import ietf-yang-types {
prefix yang;
reference
"Section 3 of RFC 6991";
}
import ietf-packet-fields {
prefix packet-fields;
reference
"Section 4.2 of RFC 8519";
}
organization
"IETF I2NSF (Interface to Network Security Functions)
Working Group";
contact
"WG Web: <https://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/i2nsf>
WG List: <mailto:i2nsf@ietf.org>
Editor: Jinyong Tim Kim
<mailto:timkim@skku.edu>
Editor: Jaehoon Paul Jeong
<mailto:pauljeong@skku.edu>";
description
"This module is a YANG module for Network Security Functions
(NSF)-Facing Interface.
The key words 'MUST', 'MUST NOT', 'REQUIRED', 'SHALL',
'SHALL NOT', 'SHOULD', 'SHOULD NOT', 'RECOMMENDED',
'NOT RECOMMENDED', 'MAY', and 'OPTIONAL' in this
document are to be interpreted as described in BCP 14
(RFC 2119) (RFC 8174) when, and only when, they appear
in all capitals, as shown here.
Copyright (c) 2022 IETF Trust and the persons identified as
authors of the code. All rights reserved.
Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or
without modification, is permitted pursuant to, and subject to
the license terms contained in, the Revised BSD License set
forth in Section 4.c of the IETF Trust's Legal Provisions
Relating to IETF Documents
(https://trustee.ietf.org/license-info).
Kim, et al. Expires 3 December 2022 [Page 15]
Internet-Draft NSF-Facing Interface YANG Data Model June 2022
This version of this YANG module is part of RFC XXXX
(https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfcXXXX); see the RFC itself
for full legal notices.";
revision "2022-06-01"{
description "The latest revision.";
reference
"RFC XXXX: I2NSF Network Security Function-Facing Interface
YANG Data Model";
}
/*
* Identities
*/
identity priority-usage {
description
"Base identity for priority usage type to define the type of
priority to be implemented in a security policy rule, such
as priority by order and priority by number.";
}
identity priority-by-order {
base priority-usage;
description
"This indicates that the priority of a security policy rule
follows the order of the configuration. The earlier the
configuration is, the higher the priority is.";
}
identity priority-by-number {
base priority-usage;
description
"This indicates the priority of a security policy rule follows
the number or value of the configuration. The higher the value
is, the higher the priority is.";
}
identity event {
description
"Base identity for policy events.";
reference
"draft-ietf-i2nsf-nsf-monitoring-data-model-20: I2NSF NSF
Monitoring Interface YANG Data Model - Event";
}
identity system-event {
base event;
Kim, et al. Expires 3 December 2022 [Page 16]
Internet-Draft NSF-Facing Interface YANG Data Model June 2022
description
"Base Identity for system events. System event (also called
alert) is defined as a warning about any changes of
configuration, any access violation, the information of
sessions and traffic flows.";
reference
"draft-ietf-i2nsf-nsf-monitoring-data-model-20: I2NSF NSF
Monitoring Interface YANG Data Model - System event";
}
identity system-alarm {
base event;
description
"Base identity for system alarms. System alarm is defined as a
warning related to service degradation in system hardware.";
reference
"draft-ietf-i2nsf-nsf-monitoring-data-model-20: I2NSF NSF
Monitoring Interface YANG Data Model - System alarm";
}
identity access-violation {
base system-event;
description
"Access-violation system event is an event when a user tries
to access (read, write, create, or delete) any information or
execute commands above their privilege (i.e., not-conformant
with the access profile).";
reference
"draft-ietf-i2nsf-nsf-monitoring-data-model-20: I2NSF NSF
Monitoring Interface YANG Data Model - System event for access
violation";
}
identity configuration-change {
base system-event;
description
"The configuration-change system event is an event when a user
adds a new configuration or modify an existing configuration
(write configuration).";
reference
"draft-ietf-i2nsf-nsf-monitoring-data-model-20: I2NSF NSF
Monitoring Interface YANG Data Model - System event for
configuration change";
}
identity memory-alarm {
base system-alarm;
description
Kim, et al. Expires 3 December 2022 [Page 17]
Internet-Draft NSF-Facing Interface YANG Data Model June 2022
"Memory is the hardware to store information temporarily or for
a short period, i.e., Random Access Memory (RAM). A
memory-alarm is emitted when the memory usage is exceeding
the threshold.";
reference
"draft-ietf-i2nsf-nsf-monitoring-data-model-20: I2NSF NSF
Monitoring Interface YANG Data Model - System alarm for
memory";
}
identity cpu-alarm {
base system-alarm;
description
"CPU is the Central Processing Unit that executes basic
operations of the system. A cpu-alarm is emitted when the CPU
usage is exceeding a threshold.";
reference
"draft-ietf-i2nsf-nsf-monitoring-data-model-20: I2NSF NSF
Monitoring Interface YANG Data Model - System alarm for CPU";
}
identity disk-alarm {
base system-alarm;
description
"Disk or storage is the hardware to store information for a
long period, i.e., Hard Disk and Solid-State Drive. A
disk-alarm is emitted when the disk usage is exceeding a
threshold.";
reference
"draft-ietf-i2nsf-nsf-monitoring-data-model-20: I2NSF NSF
Monitoring Interface YANG Data Model - System alarm for disk";
}
identity hardware-alarm {
base system-alarm;
description
"A hardware alarm is emitted when a hardware failure (e.g.,
CPU, memory, disk, or interface) is detected. A hardware
failure is a malfunction within the electronic circuits or
electromechanical components of the hardware that makes it
unusable.";
reference
"draft-ietf-i2nsf-nsf-monitoring-data-model-20: I2NSF NSF
Monitoring Interface YANG Data Model - System alarm for
hardware";
}
identity interface-alarm {
Kim, et al. Expires 3 December 2022 [Page 18]
Internet-Draft NSF-Facing Interface YANG Data Model June 2022
base system-alarm;
description
"Interface is the network interface for connecting a device
with the network. The interface-alarm is emitted when the
state of the interface is changed.";
reference
"draft-ietf-i2nsf-nsf-monitoring-data-model-20: I2NSF NSF
Monitoring Interface YANG Data Model - System alarm for
interface";
}
identity device-type {
description
"Base identity for types of device. This identity is used for
type of the device for the source or destination of a packet
or traffic flow. Note that the device type of either a source
or destination can be known with the help of DHCP
Fingerprinting and the interaction between an NSF and a DHCP
server.";
reference
"draft-ietf-i2nsf-capability-data-model-32: I2NSF Capability
YANG Data Model
RFC 2132: DHCP Options and BOOTP Vendor Extensions - Vendor
Specific Information including device type, manufacturer,
and operating system as DHCP fingerprinting information";
}
identity computer {
base device-type;
description
"Identity for computer such as personal computer (PC)
and server.";
}
identity mobile-phone {
base device-type;
description
"Identity for mobile-phone such as smartphone and
cellphone";
}
identity voip-vocn-phone {
base device-type;
description
"Identity for VoIP (Voice over Internet Protocol) or VoCN
(Voice over Cellular Network, such as Voice over LTE or 5G)
phone";
Kim, et al. Expires 3 December 2022 [Page 19]
Internet-Draft NSF-Facing Interface YANG Data Model June 2022
}
identity tablet {
base device-type;
description
"Identity for tablet devices";
}
identity network-infrastructure-device {
base device-type;
description
"Identity for network infrastructure devices
such as switch, router, and access point";
}
identity iot-device {
base device-type;
description
"Identity for Internet of Things (IoT) devices
such as sensors, actuators, and low-power
low-capacity computing devices";
}
identity ot {
base device-type;
description
"Identity for Operational Technology (OT) devices (also
known as industrial control systems) that interact
with the physical environment and detect or cause direct
change through the monitoring and control of devices,
processes, and events such as programmable logic
controllers (PLCs), digital oscilloscopes, building
management systems (BMS), and fire control systems";
}
identity vehicle {
base device-type;
description
"Identity for transportation vehicles that connect to and
share data through the Internet over Vehicle-to-Everything
(V2X) communications.";
}
identity advanced-nsf {
description
"Base identity for advanced Network Security Function (NSF)
capability. This can be used for advanced NSFs such as
Anti-DDoS Attack, IPS, URL-Filtering, Antivirus,
Kim, et al. Expires 3 December 2022 [Page 20]
Internet-Draft NSF-Facing Interface YANG Data Model June 2022
and VoIP/VoCN Filter.";
reference
"draft-ietf-i2nsf-capability-data-model-32:
I2NSF Capability YANG Data Model";
}
identity content-security-control {
base advanced-nsf;
description
"Base identity for content security control. Content security
control is an NSF that evaluates the payload of a packet,
such as Intrusion Prevention System (IPS), URL Filter,
Antivirus, and VoIP/VoCN Filter.";
reference
"draft-ietf-i2nsf-capability-data-model-32:
I2NSF Capability YANG Data Model";
}
identity ips {
base content-security-control;
description
"IPS (Intrusion Prevention System) prevents malicious activity
within a network";
}
identity url-filtering {
base content-security-control;
description
"URL filtering limits access by comparing the web traffic's
URL with the URLs for web filtering in a database";
}
identity anti-virus {
base content-security-control;
description
"Antivirus to protect the network by detecting and
removing viruses or malwares.";
}
identity voip-vocn-filtering {
base content-security-control;
description
"VoIP (Voice over Internet Protocol) and VoCN (Voice over
Cellular Network, such as Voice over LTE or 5G) security
service that filters out the packets or flows of malicious
users with a deny-list of malicious users in a database";
}
Kim, et al. Expires 3 December 2022 [Page 21]
Internet-Draft NSF-Facing Interface YANG Data Model June 2022
identity attack-mitigation-control {
base advanced-nsf;
description
"Base identity for attack mitigation control. Attack mitigation
control is an NSF that mitigates an attack such as
anti-DDoS (i.e., DDoS-mitigator).";
reference
"draft-ietf-i2nsf-capability-data-model-32:
I2NSF Capability YANG Data Model";
}
identity anti-ddos {
base attack-mitigation-control;
description
"Anti-DDoS or DDoS Mitigator to protect a server or network
from a DDoS attack. The mitigation approach is up to the
implementation.";
reference
"RFC 4732: Internet Denial-of-Service Considerations - DoS
Mitigation Strategies
RFC 4987: TCP SYN Flooding Attacks and Common Mitigations -
Common Defenses";
}
identity action {
description
"Base identity for action.";
}
identity ingress-action {
base action;
description
"Base identity for ingress action. The action to handle the
network traffic that is entering the secured network.";
reference
"draft-ietf-i2nsf-capability-data-model-32:
I2NSF Capability YANG Data Model - Ingress Action";
}
identity egress-action {
base action;
description
"Base identity for egress action. The action to handle the
network traffic that is exiting the secured network.";
reference
"draft-ietf-i2nsf-capability-data-model-32:
I2NSF Capability YANG Data Model - Egress Action";
}
Kim, et al. Expires 3 December 2022 [Page 22]
Internet-Draft NSF-Facing Interface YANG Data Model June 2022
identity default-action {
base action;
description
"Base identity for default action. The default action of the
NSF when no rule matches the packet or flow.";
reference
"draft-ietf-i2nsf-capability-data-model-32:
I2NSF Capability YANG Data Model - Default Action";
}
identity pass {
base ingress-action;
base egress-action;
base default-action;
description
"The pass action allows traffic that matches
the rule to proceed through the NSF to reach the
destination.";
reference
"draft-ietf-i2nsf-capability-data-model-32:
I2NSF Capability YANG Data Model - Actions and
Default Action";
}
identity drop {
base ingress-action;
base egress-action;
base default-action;
description
"The drop action denies the traffic that
matches the rule. The drop action should do a silent drop,
which does not give any response to the source.";
reference
"draft-ietf-i2nsf-capability-data-model-32:
I2NSF Capability YANG Data Model - Actions and
Default Action";
}
identity reject {
base ingress-action;
base egress-action;
base default-action;
description
"The reject action denies a packet to go through the NSF
entering or exiting the internal network and sends a response
back to the source. The response depends on the packet and
implementation. For example, a TCP packet is rejected with
TCP RST response or a UDP packet may be rejected with an
Kim, et al. Expires 3 December 2022 [Page 23]
Internet-Draft NSF-Facing Interface YANG Data Model June 2022
ICMPv4 response message with Type 3 Code 3 or ICMPv6 response
message Type 1 Code 4 (i.e., Destination Unreachable:
Destination port unreachable).";
}
identity mirror {
base ingress-action;
base egress-action;
base default-action;
description
"The mirror action copies a packet and sends the packet's copy
to the monitoring entity while still allowing the packet or
flow to go through the NSF.";
reference
"draft-ietf-i2nsf-capability-data-model-32:
I2NSF Capability YANG Data Model - Actions and
Default Action";
}
identity rate-limit {
base ingress-action;
base egress-action;
base default-action;
description
"The rate limit action limits the number of packets or flows
that can go through the NSF by dropping packets or flows
(randomly or systematically). The drop mechanism, e.g., silent
drop and unreachable drop (i.e., reject), is up to the
implementation";
reference
"draft-ietf-i2nsf-capability-data-model-32:
I2NSF Capability YANG Data Model - Actions and
Default Action";
}
identity log-action {
base action;
description
"Base identity for log action";
}
identity rule-log {
base log-action;
description
"Log the policy rule that has been triggered by a packet or
flow.";
}
Kim, et al. Expires 3 December 2022 [Page 24]
Internet-Draft NSF-Facing Interface YANG Data Model June 2022
identity session-log {
base log-action;
description
"A session is a connection (i.e., traffic flow) of a data plane
that includes source and destination information of IP
addresses and transport port numbers with the protocol used.
Log the session that triggered a policy rule.";
}
identity invoke-signaling {
base egress-action;
description
"The invoke-signaling action is used to convey information of
the event triggering this action to a monitoring entity.";
}
identity tunnel-encapsulation {
base egress-action;
description
"The tunnel encapsulation action is used to encapsulate the
packet to be tunneled across the network to enable a secure
connection.";
}
identity forwarding {
base egress-action;
description
"The forwarding action is used to relay the packet from one
network segment to another node in the network.";
}
identity transformation {
base egress-action;
description
"The transformation action is used to transform a packet by
modifying it (e.g., HTTP-to-CoAP packet translation).
Note that a subset of transformation (e.g., HTTP-to-CoAP) is
handled in this YANG module, rather than all the existing
transformations. Specific algorithmic transformations can be
executed by a middlebox (e.g., NSF) for a given transformation
name.";
reference
"RFC 8075: Guidelines for Mapping Implementations: HTTP to the
Constrained Application Protocol (CoAP) - Translation between
HTTP and CoAP.";
}
identity resolution-strategy {
Kim, et al. Expires 3 December 2022 [Page 25]
Internet-Draft NSF-Facing Interface YANG Data Model June 2022
description
"Base identity for resolution strategy";
reference
"draft-ietf-i2nsf-capability-data-model-32:
I2NSF Capability YANG Data Model - Resolution Strategy";
}
identity fmr {
base resolution-strategy;
description
"Conflict resolution with First Matching Rule (FMR).";
reference
"draft-ietf-i2nsf-capability-data-model-32:
I2NSF Capability YANG Data Model - Resolution Strategy";
}
identity lmr {
base resolution-strategy;
description
"Conflict resolution with Last Matching Rule (LMR)";
reference
"draft-ietf-i2nsf-capability-data-model-32:
I2NSF Capability YANG Data Model - Resolution Strategy";
}
identity pmre {
base resolution-strategy;
description
"Conflict resolution with Prioritized Matching Rule with
Errors (PMRE)";
reference
"draft-ietf-i2nsf-capability-data-model-32:
I2NSF Capability YANG Data Model - Resolution Strategy";
}
identity pmrn {
base resolution-strategy;
description
"Conflict resolution with Prioritized Matching Rule with
No Errors (PMRN)";
reference
"draft-ietf-i2nsf-capability-data-model-32:
I2NSF Capability YANG Data Model - Resolution Strategy";
}
identity application-protocol {
description
"Base identity for Application protocol. Note that a subset of
Kim, et al. Expires 3 December 2022 [Page 26]
Internet-Draft NSF-Facing Interface YANG Data Model June 2022
application protocols (e.g., HTTP, HTTPS, FTP, POP3, and
IMAP) are handled in this YANG module, rather than all
the existing application protocols.";
}
identity http {
base application-protocol;
description
"The identity for Hypertext Transfer Protocol version 1.1
(HTTP/1.1).";
reference
"draft-ietf-httpbis-semantics-19: HTTP Semantics
draft-ietf-httpbis-messaging-19: HTTP/1.1";
}
identity https {
base application-protocol;
description
"The identity for Hypertext Transfer Protocol version 1.1
(HTTP/1.1) over TLS.";
reference
"draft-ietf-httpbis-semantics-19: HTTP Semantics
draft-ietf-httpbis-messaging-19: HTTP/1.1";
}
identity http2 {
base application-protocol;
description
"The identity for Hypertext Transfer Protocol version 2
(HTTP/2).";
reference
"draft-ietf-httpbis-http2bis-07: HTTP/2";
}
identity https2 {
base application-protocol;
description
"The identity for Hypertext Transfer Protocol version 2
(HTTP/2) over TLS.";
reference
"draft-ietf-httpbis-http2bis-07: HTTP/2";
}
identity ftp {
base application-protocol;
description
"The identity for File Transfer Protocol.";
reference
Kim, et al. Expires 3 December 2022 [Page 27]
Internet-Draft NSF-Facing Interface YANG Data Model June 2022
"RFC 959: File Transfer Protocol (FTP)";
}
identity ssh {
base application-protocol;
description
"The identity for Secure Shell (SSH) protocol.";
reference
"RFC 4250: The Secure Shell (SSH) Protocol";
}
identity telnet {
base application-protocol;
description
"The identity for telnet.";
reference
"RFC 854: Telnet Protocol";
}
identity smtp {
base application-protocol;
description
"The identity for Simple Mail Transfer Protocol.";
reference
"RFC 5321: Simple Mail Transfer Protocol (SMTP)";
}
identity pop3 {
base application-protocol;
description
"The identity for Post Office Protocol 3 (POP3).";
reference
"RFC 1939: Post Office Protocol - Version 3 (POP3)";
}
identity pop3s {
base application-protocol;
description
"The identity for Post Office Protocol 3 (POP3) over TLS";
reference
"RFC 1939: Post Office Protocol - Version 3 (POP3)
RFC 2595: Using TLS with IMAP, POP3 and ACAP";
}
identity imap {
base application-protocol;
description
"The identity for Internet Message Access Protocol (IMAP).";
Kim, et al. Expires 3 December 2022 [Page 28]
Internet-Draft NSF-Facing Interface YANG Data Model June 2022
reference
"RFC 9051: Internet Message Access Protocol (IMAP) - Version
4rev2";
}
identity imaps {
base application-protocol;
description
"The identity for Internet Message Access Protocol (IMAP) over
TLS";
reference
"RFC 9051: Internet Message Access Protocol (IMAP) - Version
4rev2";
}
/*
* Typedefs
*/
typedef time {
type string {
pattern '(0[0-9]|1[0-9]|2[0-3]):[0-5][0-9]:[0-5][0-9](\.\d+)?'
+ '(Z|[\+\-]((1[0-3]|0[0-9]):([0-5][0-9])|14:00))?';
}
description
"The time type represents an instance of time of zero-duration
in the specified timezone that recurs every day.";
}
typedef day {
type enumeration {
enum monday {
description
"This represents Monday.";
}
enum tuesday {
description
"This represents Tuesday.";
}
enum wednesday {
description
"This represents Wednesday";
}
enum thursday {
description
"This represents Thursday.";
}
enum friday {
Kim, et al. Expires 3 December 2022 [Page 29]
Internet-Draft NSF-Facing Interface YANG Data Model June 2022
description
"This represents Friday.";
}
enum saturday {
description
"This represents Saturday.";
}
enum sunday {
description
"This represents Sunday.";
}
}
description
"The type for representing the day of the week.";
}
/*
* Groupings
*/
grouping port-range {
leaf start {
type inet:port-number;
description
"A start port number for a range match.";
}
leaf end {
type inet:port-number;
must '. >= ../start' {
error-message
"An end port number MUST be equal to or greater than a
start port number.";
}
description
"An end port number for a range match.";
}
description
"A range match for port numbers. If only one value is needed,
then set both start and end to the same value.";
reference
"draft-ietf-tcpm-rfc793bis-25: Transmission Control Protocol
(TCP) Specification - Port Number
RFC 768: User Datagram Protocol - Port Number
draft-ietf-tsvwg-rfc4960-bis-18: Stream Control Transmission
Protocol - Port Number
RFC 4340: Datagram Congestion Control Protocol (DCCP)
- Port Number";
}
Kim, et al. Expires 3 December 2022 [Page 30]
Internet-Draft NSF-Facing Interface YANG Data Model June 2022
grouping ipv4-range {
description
"A range match for IPv4 addresses. If only one value is
needed, then set both start and end to the same value.
The end IPv4 address MUST be equal to or greater than the
start IPv4 address.";
leaf start {
type inet:ipv4-address-no-zone;
description
"A start IPv4 address for a range match.";
}
leaf end {
type inet:ipv4-address-no-zone;
description
"An end IPv4 address for a range match.";
}
reference
"RFC 791: Internet Protocol - IPv4 address";
}
grouping ipv6-range {
description
"A range match for IPv6 addresses. If only one value is
needed, then set both start and end to the same value.
The end IPv6 address MUST be equal to or greater than the
start IPv6 address.";
leaf start {
type inet:ipv6-address-no-zone;
description
"A start IPv6 address for a range match.";
}
leaf end {
type inet:ipv6-address-no-zone;
description
"An end IPv6 address for a range match.";
}
reference
"RFC 8200: Internet Protocol, Version 6 (IPv6)
Specification - IPv6 address";
}
/*
* Data nodes
*/
list i2nsf-security-policy {
Kim, et al. Expires 3 December 2022 [Page 31]
Internet-Draft NSF-Facing Interface YANG Data Model June 2022
key "name";
description
"Container for security policy
including a set of security rules according to certain logic,
i.e., their similarity or mutual relations, etc. The network
security policy can be applied to both the unidirectional
and bidirectional traffic across the NSF.
The I2NSF security policies use the Event-Condition-Action
(ECA) policy model ";
reference
"RFC 8329: Framework for Interface to Network Security
Functions - I2NSF Flow Security Policy Structure
draft-ietf-i2nsf-capability-data-model-32:
I2NSF Capability YANG Data Model - Design Principles and
ECA Policy Model Overview";
leaf name {
type string;
description
"The name of the security policy.
This must be unique.";
}
leaf language {
type string {
pattern '((([A-Za-z]{2,3}(-[A-Za-z]{3}(-[A-Za-z]{3})'
+ '{0,2})?)|[A-Za-z]{4}|[A-Za-z]{5,8})(-[A-Za-z]{4})?'
+ '(-([A-Za-z]{2}|[0-9]{3}))?(-([A-Za-z0-9]{5,8}'
+ '|([0-9][A-Za-z0-9]{3})))*(-[0-9A-WYZa-wyz]'
+ '(-([A-Za-z0-9]{2,8}))+)*(-[Xx](-([A-Za-z0-9]'
+ '{1,8}))+)?|[Xx](-([A-Za-z0-9]{1,8}))+|'
+ '(([Ee][Nn]-[Gg][Bb]-[Oo][Ee][Dd]|[Ii]-'
+ '[Aa][Mm][Ii]|[Ii]-[Bb][Nn][Nn]|[Ii]-'
+ '[Dd][Ee][Ff][Aa][Uu][Ll][Tt]|[Ii]-'
+ '[Ee][Nn][Oo][Cc][Hh][Ii][Aa][Nn]'
+ '|[Ii]-[Hh][Aa][Kk]|'
+ '[Ii]-[Kk][Ll][Ii][Nn][Gg][Oo][Nn]|'
+ '[Ii]-[Ll][Uu][Xx]|[Ii]-[Mm][Ii][Nn][Gg][Oo]|'
+ '[Ii]-[Nn][Aa][Vv][Aa][Jj][Oo]|[Ii]-[Pp][Ww][Nn]|'
+ '[Ii]-[Tt][Aa][Oo]|[Ii]-[Tt][Aa][Yy]|'
+ '[Ii]-[Tt][Ss][Uu]|[Ss][Gg][Nn]-[Bb][Ee]-[Ff][Rr]|'
+ '[Ss][Gg][Nn]-[Bb][Ee]-[Nn][Ll]|[Ss][Gg][Nn]-'
+ '[Cc][Hh]-[Dd][Ee])|([Aa][Rr][Tt]-'
+ '[Ll][Oo][Jj][Bb][Aa][Nn]|[Cc][Ee][Ll]-'
+ '[Gg][Aa][Uu][Ll][Ii][Ss][Hh]|'
+ '[Nn][Oo]-[Bb][Oo][Kk]|[Nn][Oo]-'
Kim, et al. Expires 3 December 2022 [Page 32]
Internet-Draft NSF-Facing Interface YANG Data Model June 2022
+ '[Nn][Yy][Nn]|[Zz][Hh]-[Gg][Uu][Oo][Yy][Uu]|'
+ '[Zz][Hh]-[Hh][Aa][Kk][Kk][Aa]|[Zz][Hh]-'
+ '[Mm][Ii][Nn]|[Zz][Hh]-[Mm][Ii][Nn]-'
+ '[Nn][Aa][Nn]|[Zz][Hh]-[Xx][Ii][Aa][Nn][Gg])))';
}
default "en-US";
description
"The value in this field indicates the language tag
used for all of the 'leaf description' described in the
'i2nsf-security-policy'. This field is mandatory only when
one or more of the 'leaf description' is used.
The attribute is encoded following the rules in Section 2.1
in RFC 5646. The default language tag is 'en-US'";
reference
"RFC 5646: Tags for Identifying Languages";
}
leaf priority-usage {
type identityref {
base priority-usage;
}
default priority-by-order;
description
"Priority usage type for security policy rule:
priority by order and priority by number";
}
leaf resolution-strategy {
type identityref {
base resolution-strategy;
}
default fmr;
description
"The resolution strategies that can be used to
specify how to resolve conflicts that occur between
actions of the same or different policy rules that
are matched and contained in this particular NSF";
reference
"draft-ietf-i2nsf-capability-data-model-32:
I2NSF Capability YANG Data Model - Resolution strategy";
}
leaf default-action {
type identityref {
base default-action;
}
Kim, et al. Expires 3 December 2022 [Page 33]
Internet-Draft NSF-Facing Interface YANG Data Model June 2022
default mirror;
description
"This default action can be used to specify a predefined
action when no other alternative action was matched
by the currently executing I2NSF Policy Rule. An analogy
is the use of a default statement in a C switch statement.";
reference
"draft-ietf-i2nsf-capability-data-model-32:
I2NSF Capability YANG Data Model - Default Action";
}
list rules {
key "name";
description
"This is a rule for network security functions.";
leaf name {
type string;
description
"The name of the rule.";
}
leaf description {
type string;
description
"This description gives more information about
rules.";
}
leaf priority {
type uint8 {
range "1..255";
}
description
"The priority for the rule comes with a mandatory
numeric value which can range from 1 up to 255.
Note that a higher number means a higher priority";
}
leaf enable {
type boolean;
description
"If true, the rule is enabled and enforced.
If false, the rule is configured but disabled and not
enforced.";
}
container long-connection {
Kim, et al. Expires 3 December 2022 [Page 34]
Internet-Draft NSF-Facing Interface YANG Data Model June 2022
description
"A container for long connection. A long connection is a
connection that is maintained after the socket connection
is established, regardless of whether it is used for data
traffic or not.";
leaf enable {
type boolean;
description
"If true, the rule is enabled and enforced.
If false, the rule is configured but disabled
and not enforced.";
}
leaf duration {
when "../enable = 'true'";
type uint32;
units "second";
description
"This is the maximum inactive connection duration of a
long connection before a connection is declared as
expired.";
}
}
container event {
description
"An event is defined as any important
occurrence in time of a change in the system being
managed, and/or in the environment of the system being
managed. When used in the context of policy rules for
a flow-based NSF, it is used to determine whether the
Condition clause of the Policy Rule can be evaluated
or not. Examples of an I2NSF event include time and
user actions (e.g., logon, logoff, and actions that
violate any ACL.).";
reference
"RFC 8329: Framework for Interface to Network Security
Functions - I2NSF Flow Security Policy Structure
draft-ietf-i2nsf-capability-data-model-32:
I2NSF Capability YANG Data Model - Design Principles and
ECA Policy Model Overview
draft-ietf-i2nsf-nsf-monitoring-data-model-20: I2NSF
NSF Monitoring Interface YANG Data Model - Alarms,
Events, Logs, and Counters";
leaf description {
Kim, et al. Expires 3 December 2022 [Page 35]
Internet-Draft NSF-Facing Interface YANG Data Model June 2022
type string;
description
"Description for an event clause";
}
leaf-list system-event {
type identityref {
base system-event;
}
description
"The security policy rule according to
system events.";
}
leaf-list system-alarm {
type identityref {
base system-alarm;
}
description
"The security policy rule according to
system alarms.";
}
}
container condition {
description
"A condition is defined as a set
of attributes, features, and/or values that are to be
compared with a set of known attributes, features,
and/or values in order to determine whether the
set of Actions in that (imperative) I2NSF Policy Rule
can be executed or not. Examples of I2NSF Conditions
include matching attributes of a packet or flow, and
comparing the internal state of an NSF to a desired
state.
The condition works with 'AND' logic, where all
fields set in a condition MUST match the packet or flow
for the condition to be evaluated as 'TRUE'";
reference
"RFC 8329: Framework for Interface to Network Security
Functions - I2NSF Flow Security Policy Structure
draft-ietf-i2nsf-capability-data-model-32:
I2NSF Capability YANG Data Model - Design Principles and
ECA Policy Model Overview";
leaf description {
type string;
description
Kim, et al. Expires 3 December 2022 [Page 36]
Internet-Draft NSF-Facing Interface YANG Data Model June 2022
"Description for a condition clause.";
}
list layer-2 {
key "destination-mac-address source-mac-address ethertype";
description
"The purpose of this container is to represent layer 2
packet header information to determine the set of policy
actions in this ECA policy rule should be executed or
not.";
reference
"IEEE 802.3: IEEE Standard for Ethernet";
leaf description {
type string;
description
"The ethernet condition description";
}
uses packet-fields:acl-eth-header-fields;
}
choice layer-3 {
case ipv4 {
container ipv4 {
description
"The purpose of this container is to represent
IPv4 packet header information to determine if
the set of policy actions in this ECA policy rule
should be executed or not.";
reference
"RFC 791: Internet Protocol";
leaf description {
type string;
description
"This is description for IPv4 condition.";
}
uses packet-fields:acl-ip-header-fields;
uses packet-fields:acl-ipv4-header-fields {
augment destination-network {
case destination-ipv4-range {
list destination-ipv4-range {
key "start end";
uses ipv4-range;
description
"The list of IPv4 addresses specified with
Kim, et al. Expires 3 December 2022 [Page 37]
Internet-Draft NSF-Facing Interface YANG Data Model June 2022
a start IPv4 address and an end IPv4
address. If only one value is needed, then
set both start and end to the same value.
Note that the 'end' IPv4 address MUST be
equal to or greater than the 'start' IPv4
address.";
}
}
description
"IPv4 destination network denoted as IPv4
addresses";
}
augment source-network {
case source-ipv4-range {
list source-ipv4-range {
key "start end";
uses ipv4-range;
description
"The list of IPv4 addresses specified with
a start IPv4 address and an end IPv4
address. If only one value is needed, then
set both start and end to the same value.
Note that the 'end' IPv4 address MUST be
equal or greater than the 'start' IPv4
address.";
}
}
description
"IPv4 source network denoted as IPv4
addresses";
}
}
}
}
case ipv6 {
container ipv6 {
description
"The purpose of this container is to represent IPv6
packet header information to determine if the set
of policy actions in this ECA policy rule should
be executed or not.";
reference
"RFC 8200: Internet Protocol, Version 6 (IPv6)
Specification";
leaf description {
type string;
Kim, et al. Expires 3 December 2022 [Page 38]
Internet-Draft NSF-Facing Interface YANG Data Model June 2022
description
"This is description for IPv6 condition.";
}
uses packet-fields:acl-ip-header-fields;
uses packet-fields:acl-ipv6-header-fields {
augment destination-network {
case destination-ipv6-range {
list destination-ipv6-range {
key "start end";
uses ipv6-range;
description
"The list of IPv6 addresses specified with
a start IPv6 address and an end IPv6
address. If only one value is needed, then
set both start and end to the same value.
Note that the 'end' IPv6 address MUST be
equal to or greater than the 'start' IPv6
address.";
}
}
description
"IPv6 destination network denoted as IPv6
addresses";
}
augment source-network {
case source-ipv6-range {
list source-ipv6-range {
key "start end";
uses ipv6-range;
description
"The list of IPv6 addresses specified with
a start IPv6 address and an end IPv6
address. If only one value is needed, then
set both start and end to the same value.
Note that the 'end' IPv6 address MUST be
equal to or greater than the 'start' IPv6
address.";
}
}
description
"IPv6 source network denoted as IPv6
addresses";
}
}
}
}
description
Kim, et al. Expires 3 December 2022 [Page 39]
Internet-Draft NSF-Facing Interface YANG Data Model June 2022
"Choice of either IPv4 or IPv6 as layer-3 protocol";
}
choice layer-4 {
case tcp {
container tcp {
description
"The purpose of this container is to represent
TCP packet header information to determine
if the set of policy actions in this ECA policy
rule should be executed or not.";
reference
"draft-ietf-tcpm-rfc793bis-25: Transmission Control
Protocol (TCP) Specification";
leaf description {
type string;
description
"This is description for tcp condition.";
}
container source-port-number {
choice source-port {
case range-or-operator {
uses packet-fields:port-range-or-operator;
description
"Source port definition from range or operator.
Can be used when a single port range to be
specified.";
}
case port-list {
list port-numbers {
key "start end";
uses port-range;
description
"List of source port numbers.";
}
description
"Source port definition from list of port
numbers. In the case of multiple port ranges
needed to be specified.";
}
description
"The choice of source port definition using
range/operator or a choice to use list of port
numbers.";
}
Kim, et al. Expires 3 December 2022 [Page 40]
Internet-Draft NSF-Facing Interface YANG Data Model June 2022
description
"The security policy rule according to
tcp source port number.";
reference
"draft-ietf-tcpm-rfc793bis-25: Transmission Control
Protocol (TCP) Specification - Port Number";
}
container destination-port-number {
choice destination-port {
case range-or-operator {
uses packet-fields:port-range-or-operator;
description
"Destination port definition from range or
operator.
Can be used when a single port range to be
specified.";
}
case port-list {
list port-numbers {
key "start end";
uses port-range;
description
"List of destination port numbers.";
}
description
"Destination port definition from list of port
numbers.
In the case of multiple port ranges needed to
be specified.";
}
description
"The choice of destination port definition using
range/operator or a choice to use list of port
numbers.";
}
description
"The security policy rule according to
tcp destination port number.";
reference
"draft-ietf-tcpm-rfc793bis-25: Transmission Control
Protocol (TCP) Specification - Port Number";
}
uses packet-fields:acl-tcp-header-fields;
}
}
Kim, et al. Expires 3 December 2022 [Page 41]
Internet-Draft NSF-Facing Interface YANG Data Model June 2022
case udp {
container udp {
description
"The purpose of this container is to represent
UDP packet header information to determine
if the set of policy actions in this ECA policy
rule should be executed or not.";
reference
"RFC 768: User Datagram Protocol";
leaf description {
type string;
description
"This is description for udp condition.";
}
container source-port-number {
choice source-port {
case range-or-operator {
uses packet-fields:port-range-or-operator;
description
"Source port definition from range or operator.
Can be used when a single port range to be
specified.";
}
case port-list {
list port-numbers {
key "start end";
uses port-range;
description
"List of source port numbers.";
}
description
"Source port definition from list of port
numbers. In the case of multiple port ranges
needed to be specified.";
}
description
"The choice of source port definition using
range/operator or a choice to use list of port
numbers.";
}
description
"The security policy rule according to
udp source port number.";
reference
"RFC 768: User Datagram Protocol - Port Number";
}
Kim, et al. Expires 3 December 2022 [Page 42]
Internet-Draft NSF-Facing Interface YANG Data Model June 2022
container destination-port-number {
choice destination-port {
case range-or-operator {
uses packet-fields:port-range-or-operator;
description
"Destination port definition from range or
operator.
Can be used when a single port range to be
specified.";
}
case port-list {
list port-numbers {
key "start end";
uses port-range;
description
"List of destination port numbers.";
}
description
"Destination port definition from list of port
numbers.
In the case of multiple port ranges needed to
be specified.";
}
description
"The choice of destination port definition using
range/operator or a choice to use list of port
numbers.";
}
description
"The security policy rule according to
udp destination port number.";
reference
"RFC 768: User Datagram Protocol - Port Number";
}
uses packet-fields:acl-udp-header-fields;
}
}
case sctp {
container sctp {
description
"The purpose of this container is to represent
SCTP packet header information to determine
if the set of policy actions in this ECA policy
rule should be executed or not.";
leaf description {
Kim, et al. Expires 3 December 2022 [Page 43]
Internet-Draft NSF-Facing Interface YANG Data Model June 2022
type string;
description
"This is description for sctp condition.";
}
container source-port-number {
choice source-port {
case range-or-operator {
uses packet-fields:port-range-or-operator;
description
"Source port definition from range or operator.
Can be used when a single port range to be
specified.";
}
case port-list {
list port-numbers {
key "start end";
uses port-range;
description
"List of source port numbers.";
}
description
"Source port definition from list of port
numbers. In the case of multiple port ranges
needed to be specified.";
}
description
"The choice of source port definition using
range/operator or a choice to use list of port
numbers.";
}
description
"The security policy rule according to
sctp source port number.";
reference
"draft-ietf-tsvwg-rfc4960-bis-18: Stream Control
Transmission Protocol - Port number";
}
container destination-port-number {
choice destination-port {
case range-or-operator {
uses packet-fields:port-range-or-operator;
description
"Destination port definition from range or
operator.
Can be used when a single port range to be
specified.";
Kim, et al. Expires 3 December 2022 [Page 44]
Internet-Draft NSF-Facing Interface YANG Data Model June 2022
}
case port-list {
list port-numbers {
key "start end";
uses port-range;
description
"List of destination port numbers.";
}
description
"Destination port definition from list of port
numbers.
In the case of multiple port ranges needed to
be specified.";
}
description
"The choice of destination port definition using
range/operator or a choice to use list of port
numbers.";
}
description
"The security policy rule according to
sctp destination port number.";
reference
"draft-ietf-tsvwg-rfc4960-bis-18: Stream Control
Transmission Protocol - Port Number";
}
leaf-list chunk-type {
type uint8;
description
"The security policy rule according to
sctp chunk type ID Value.";
reference
"draft-ietf-tsvwg-rfc4960-bis-18: Stream Control
Transmission Protocol - Chunk Type";
}
leaf chunk-length {
type uint16 {
range "4..max";
}
description
"The security policy rule according to the length
of the chunk in sctp. This value represents the
size of the chunk in bytes, including the Chunk
Type, Chunk Flags, Chunk Length, and Chunk Value
fields.";
reference
Kim, et al. Expires 3 December 2022 [Page 45]
Internet-Draft NSF-Facing Interface YANG Data Model June 2022
"draft-ietf-tsvwg-rfc4960-bis-18: Stream Control
Transmission Protocol - Chunk Length";
}
}
}
case dccp {
container dccp {
description
"The purpose of this container is to represent
DCCP packet header information to determine
if the set of policy actions in this ECA policy
rule should be executed or not.";
leaf description {
type string;
description
"This is description for dccp condition.";
}
container source-port-number {
choice source-port {
case range-or-operator {
uses packet-fields:port-range-or-operator;
description
"Source port definition from range or operator.
Can be used when a single port range to be
specified.";
}
case port-list {
list port-numbers {
key "start end";
uses port-range;
description
"List of source port numbers.";
}
description
"Source port definition from list of port
numbers. In the case of multiple port ranges
needed to be specified.";
}
description
"The choice of source port definition using
range/operator or a choice to use list of port
numbers.";
}
description
"The security policy rule according to
dccp source port number.";
Kim, et al. Expires 3 December 2022 [Page 46]
Internet-Draft NSF-Facing Interface YANG Data Model June 2022
reference
"RFC 4340: Datagram Congestion Control Protocol
(DCCP) - Port number";
}
container destination-port-number {
choice destination-port {
case range-or-operator {
uses packet-fields:port-range-or-operator;
description
"Destination port definition from range or
operator.
Can be used when a single port range to be
specified.";
}
case port-list {
list port-numbers {
key "start end";
uses port-range;
description
"List of destination port numbers.";
}
description
"Destination port definition from list of port
numbers. In the case of multiple port ranges
needed to be specified.";
}
description
"The choice of destination port definition using
range/operator or a choice to use list of port
numbers.";
}
description
"The security policy rule according to
dccp destination port number.";
reference
"RFC 4340: Datagram Congestion Control Protocol
(DCCP) - Port number";
}
leaf-list service-code {
type uint32;
description
"The security policy rule according to
dccp service code.";
reference
"RFC 4340: Datagram Congestion Control Protocol
(DCCP) - Service Codes
Kim, et al. Expires 3 December 2022 [Page 47]
Internet-Draft NSF-Facing Interface YANG Data Model June 2022
RFC 5595: The Datagram Congestion Control Protocol
(DCCP) Service Codes
RFC 6335: Internet Assigned Numbers Authority
(IANA) Procedures for the Management of
the Service Name and Transport Protocol
Port Number Registry - Service Code";
}
leaf-list type {
type uint8 {
range "0..15";
}
description
"The security policy rule according to the 4 bits
of dccp type header field for dccp packet types
such as DCCP-Request, DCCP-Response, DCCP-Data,
DCCP-Ack, and DCCP-DataAck.";
reference
"RFC 4340: Datagram Congestion Control Protocol
(DCCP) - Packet Types";
}
leaf data-offset {
type uint8;
description
"The security policy rule according to the offset
from
the start of the packet's DCCP header to the start
of its application data area, in 32-bit word.";
reference
"RFC 4340: Datagram Congestion Control Protocol
(DCCP) - Data Offset";
}
}
}
case icmp {
container icmp {
description
"The purpose of this container is to represent
ICMPv4 and ICMPv6 packet header information to
determine if the set of policy actions in this ECA
policy rule should be executed or not.";
reference
"RFC 792: Internet Control Message Protocol
RFC 8335: PROBE: A Utility for Probing Interfaces";
leaf description {
type string;
Kim, et al. Expires 3 December 2022 [Page 48]
Internet-Draft NSF-Facing Interface YANG Data Model June 2022
description
"This is description for icmp condition.";
}
leaf version {
type enumeration {
enum icmpv4 {
value "1";
description
"The ICMPv4 Protocol as defined in RFC 792";
}
enum icmpv6 {
value "2";
description
"The ICMPv6 Protocol as defined in RFC 4443";
}
}
description
"The ICMP version to be matched. This value
affected the type and code values.";
reference
"RFC 792: Internet Control Message Protocol
RFC 4443: Internet Control Message Protocol
(ICMPv6) for the Internet Protocol
Version 6 (IPv6) Specification";
}
uses packet-fields:acl-icmp-header-fields;
}
}
description
"Choice of TCP, UDP, SCTP, DCCP, and ICMP as a layer-4
protocol.";
}
container url-category {
description
"Condition for url category";
leaf description {
type string;
description
"This is description for the condition of a URL's
category such as SNS sites, game sites, ecommerce
sites, company sites, and university sites.";
}
leaf-list pre-defined {
type string;
Kim, et al. Expires 3 December 2022 [Page 49]
Internet-Draft NSF-Facing Interface YANG Data Model June 2022
description
"This is pre-defined-category. To specify the name of
URL database.";
}
leaf-list user-defined {
type string;
description
"This user-defined-category. To allow a user's manual
addition of URLs for URL filtering.";
reference
"RFC 3986: Uniform Resource Identifier (URI): Generic
Syntax";
}
}
container voice {
description
"For the VoIP/VoCN security system, a VoIP/
VoCN security system can monitor each
VoIP/VoCN flow and manage VoIP/VoCN
security rules controlled by a centralized
server for VoIP/VoCN security service
(called VoIP IPS). The VoIP/VoCN security
system controls each switch for the
VoIP/VoCN call flow management by
manipulating the rules that can be added,
deleted, or modified dynamically.";
reference
"RFC 3261: SIP: Session Initiation Protocol";
leaf description {
type string;
description
"This is description for voice condition.";
}
leaf-list source-voice-id {
type string;
description
"The security policy rule according to
a source voice ID for VoIP and VoCN.";
}
leaf-list destination-voice-id {
type string;
description
"The security policy rule according to
a destination voice ID for VoIP and VoCN.";
Kim, et al. Expires 3 December 2022 [Page 50]
Internet-Draft NSF-Facing Interface YANG Data Model June 2022
}
leaf-list user-agent {
type string;
description
"The security policy rule according to
a user agent for VoIP and VoCN.";
}
}
container ddos {
description
"Condition for DDoS attack.";
leaf description {
type string;
description
"This is description for ddos condition.";
}
leaf alert-packet-rate {
type uint32;
units "pps";
description
"The alert rate of flood detection for
packets per second (PPS) of an IP address.
If the PPS of an IP address exceeds
the alert rate threshold, an alert
will be generated.";
}
leaf alert-flow-rate {
type uint32;
description
"The alert rate of flood detection for the
flow creating requests (e.g., new TCP connection
establishment) per second of an IP address as
either a source node or a destination node. If
the flows per second of an IP address exceeds
the alert rate threshold, an alert will be
generated.";
}
leaf alert-byte-rate {
type uint32;
units "Bps";
description
"The alert rate of flood detection for
Kim, et al. Expires 3 December 2022 [Page 51]
Internet-Draft NSF-Facing Interface YANG Data Model June 2022
bytes per second (Bps) of an IP address.
If the bytes per second of an IP address
exceeds the alert rate threshold, an alert
will be generated.";
}
}
container anti-virus {
description
"Condition for antivirus";
leaf-list profile {
type string;
description
"The security profile for antivirus. This is used to
update the security profile for improving the
security. The security profile is used to scan
the viruses.";
}
leaf-list exception-files {
type string;
description
"The type or name of the files to be excluded by the
antivirus. This can be used to keep the known
harmless files. Absolute paths are filenames/paths
to be excluded and relative ones are interpreted as
globs.";
reference
"GLOB: Linux Programmer's Manual - GLOB";
}
}
container payload {
description
"Condition for packet payload";
leaf description {
type string;
description
"This is description for payload condition.";
}
leaf-list content {
type binary;
description
"This is a condition for packet payload content.
The payload content is the binary stream contained
by a security attack such as backdoor attack. It is
usually used for Deep Packet Inspection (DPI).";
Kim, et al. Expires 3 December 2022 [Page 52]
Internet-Draft NSF-Facing Interface YANG Data Model June 2022
}
}
container context {
description
"Condition for context";
leaf description {
type string;
description
"This is description for context condition.";
}
container time {
description
"Time to determine when the policy should be applied";
leaf start-date-time {
type yang:date-and-time;
description
"This is the start date and time for a security
policy rule.";
}
leaf end-date-time {
type yang:date-and-time;
description
"This is the end date and time for a policy rule.
The policy rule will stop working after the
specified end-date-time.";
}
container period {
when
"../frequency!='only-once'";
description
"This represents the repetition time. In the case
where the frequency is weekly, the days can be
set.";
leaf start-time {
type time;
description
"This is a period's start time for an event.";
}
leaf end-time {
type time;
description
"This is a period's end time for an event.";
}
leaf-list day {
Kim, et al. Expires 3 December 2022 [Page 53]
Internet-Draft NSF-Facing Interface YANG Data Model June 2022
when
"../../frequency='weekly'";
type day;
min-elements 1;
description
"This represents the repeated day of every week
(e.g., Monday and Tuesday). More than one day
can be specified.";
}
leaf-list date {
when
"../../frequency='monthly'";
type int8 {
range "1..31";
}
min-elements 1;
description
"This represents the repeated date of every month.
More than one date can be specified.";
}
leaf-list month {
when
"../../frequency='yearly'";
type string{
pattern '\d{2}-\d{2}';
}
min-elements 1;
description
"This represents the repeated date and month of
every year. More than one can be specified.
A pattern used here is Month and Date (MM-DD).";
}
}
leaf frequency {
type enumeration {
enum only-once {
description
"This represents that the rule is immediately
enforced only once and not repeated. The policy
will continuously be active from the start-time
to the end-time.";
}
enum daily {
description
"This represents that the rule is enforced on a
daily basis. The policy will be repeated
daily until the end-date.";
Kim, et al. Expires 3 December 2022 [Page 54]
Internet-Draft NSF-Facing Interface YANG Data Model June 2022
}
enum weekly {
description
"This represents that the rule is enforced on a
weekly basis. The policy will be repeated
weekly until the end-date. The repeated days
can be specified.";
}
enum monthly {
description
"This represents that the rule is enforced on a
monthly basis. The policy will be repeated
monthly until the end-date.";
}
enum yearly {
description
"This represents that the rule is enforced on
a yearly basis. The policy will be repeated
yearly until the end-date.";
}
}
default only-once;
description
"This represents how frequently the rule
should be enforced.";
}
}
container application {
description
"Condition for application";
leaf description {
type string;
description
"This is description for application condition.";
}
leaf-list protocol {
type identityref {
base application-protocol;
}
description
"The condition based on the application layer
protocol";
}
}
container device-type {
description
Kim, et al. Expires 3 December 2022 [Page 55]
Internet-Draft NSF-Facing Interface YANG Data Model June 2022
"Condition for type of the destination device";
leaf description {
type string;
description
"This is description for destination device type
condition. Vendors can write instructions for the
condition that vendor made";
}
leaf-list device {
type identityref {
base device-type;
}
description
"The device attribute that can identify a device,
including the device type (i.e., router, switch,
pc, ios, or android) and the device's owner as
well.";
}
}
container users {
description
"Condition for users";
leaf description {
type string;
description
"This is the description for users' condition.";
}
list user {
key "id";
description
"The user with which the traffic flow is associated
can be identified by either a user ID or username.
The user-to-IP address mapping is assumed to be
provided by the unified user management system via
network.";
leaf id {
type uint32;
description
"The ID of the user.";
}
leaf name {
type string;
description
"The name of the user.";
}
}
Kim, et al. Expires 3 December 2022 [Page 56]
Internet-Draft NSF-Facing Interface YANG Data Model June 2022
list group {
key "id";
description
"The user group with which the traffic flow is
associated can be identified by either a group ID
or group name. The group-to-IP address and
user-to-group mappings are assumed to be provided by
the unified user management system via network.";
leaf id {
type uint32;
description
"The ID of the group.";
}
leaf name {
type string;
description
"The name of the group.";
}
}
}
container geographic-location {
description
"The location which network traffic flow is associated
with. The region can be the geographic location such
as country, province, and city, as well as the logical
network location such as IP address, network section,
and network domain.";
reference
"RFC 9179: A YANG Grouping for Geographic Locations";
leaf description {
type string;
description
"This is the description for the geographic location
condition. It is used to describe the conditions and
instructions that should be implemented.";
}
leaf-list source {
type string;
description
"The source is a geographic location mapped into an
IP address. It matches the mapped IP address to the
source IP address of the traffic flow.";
reference
"ISO 3166: Codes for the representation of
names of countries and their subdivisions
Kim, et al. Expires 3 December 2022 [Page 57]
Internet-Draft NSF-Facing Interface YANG Data Model June 2022
RFC 9179: A YANG Grouping for Geographic Locations";
}
leaf-list destination {
type string;
description
"The destination is a geographic location mapped into
an IP address. It matches the mapped IP address to
the destination IP address of the traffic flow.";
reference
"ISO 3166: Codes for the representation of
names of countries and their subdivisions
RFC 9179: A YANG Grouping for Geographic Locations";
}
}
}
}
container action {
description
"An action is used to control and monitor aspects of
flow-based NSFs when the event and condition clauses
are satisfied. NSFs provide security functions by
executing various Actions. Examples of I2NSF Actions
include providing intrusion detection and/or protection,
web and flow filtering, and deep packet inspection
for packets and flows.";
reference
"RFC 8329: Framework for Interface to Network Security
Functions - I2NSF Flow Security Policy Structure
draft-ietf-i2nsf-capability-data-model-32:
I2NSF Capability YANG Data Model - Design Principles and
ECA Policy Model Overview";
leaf description {
type string;
description
"Description for an action clause.";
}
container packet-action {
description
"Action for packets";
reference
"RFC 8329: Framework for Interface to Network Security
Functions - I2NSF Flow Security Policy Structure
draft-ietf-i2nsf-capability-data-model-32:
I2NSF Capability YANG Data Model - Design Principles and
Kim, et al. Expires 3 December 2022 [Page 58]
Internet-Draft NSF-Facing Interface YANG Data Model June 2022
ECA Policy Model Overview";
leaf ingress-action {
type identityref {
base ingress-action;
}
description
"Ingress Action: pass, drop, reject, rate-limit, and
mirror.";
}
leaf egress-action {
type identityref {
base egress-action;
}
description
"Egress action: pass, drop, reject, rate-limit, mirror,
invoke-signaling, tunnel-encapsulation, forwarding,
redirection, and transformation.";
}
leaf log-action {
type identityref {
base log-action;
}
description
"Log action: rule log and session log";
}
}
container flow-action {
description
"Action for flows";
reference
"RFC 8329: Framework for Interface to Network Security
Functions - I2NSF Flow Security Policy Structure
draft-ietf-i2nsf-capability-data-model-32:
I2NSF Capability YANG Data Model - Design Principles and
ECA Policy Model Overview";
leaf ingress-action {
type identityref {
base ingress-action;
}
description
"Action: pass, drop, reject, rate-limit, and mirror.";
}
Kim, et al. Expires 3 December 2022 [Page 59]
Internet-Draft NSF-Facing Interface YANG Data Model June 2022
leaf egress-action {
type identityref {
base egress-action;
}
description
"Egress action: pass, drop, reject, rate-limit, mirror,
invoke-signaling, tunnel-encapsulation, forwarding,
redirection, and transformation.";
}
leaf log-action {
type identityref {
base log-action;
}
description
"Log action: rule log and session log";
}
}
container advanced-action {
description
"If the packet needs to be additionally inspected,
the packet is passed to advanced network
security functions according to the profile.
The profile means the types of NSFs where the packet
will be forwarded in order to additionally
inspect the packet.
The advanced action activates Service Function
Chaining (SFC) for further inspection of a packet.";
reference
"draft-ietf-i2nsf-capability-data-model-32:
I2NSF Capability YANG Data Model - YANG Tree
Diagram";
leaf-list content-security-control {
type identityref {
base content-security-control;
}
description
"Content-security-control is the NSFs that
inspect the payload of the packet.
The profile for the types of NSFs for mitigation is
divided into content security control and
attack-mitigation-control.
Content security control: ips, url filtering,
antivirus, and voip-vocn-filter. This can be
extended according to the provided NSFs.";
reference
Kim, et al. Expires 3 December 2022 [Page 60]
Internet-Draft NSF-Facing Interface YANG Data Model June 2022
"draft-ietf-i2nsf-capability-data-model-32:
I2NSF Capability YANG Data Model - YANG Tree Diagram";
}
leaf-list attack-mitigation-control {
type identityref {
base attack-mitigation-control;
}
description
"Attack-mitigation-control is the NSFs that weaken
the attacks related to a denial-of-service (DoS)
and reconnaissance.
The profile for the types of NSFs for mitigation is
divided into content security control and
attack-mitigation-control.
Attack mitigation control: Anti-DDoS or DDoS
mitigator. This can be extended according to the
provided NSFs such as mitigators for ip sweep,
port scanning, ping of death, teardrop, oversized
icmp, and tracert.";
reference
"draft-ietf-i2nsf-capability-data-model-32:
I2NSF Capability YANG Data Model - YANG Tree Diagram";
}
}
}
}
container rule-group {
description
"This is rule group";
list groups {
key "group-name";
description
"This is a group for rules";
leaf group-name {
type string;
description
"This is the name of the group for rules";
}
leaf-list rule-name {
type leafref {
path
"../../../rules/name";
}
description
Kim, et al. Expires 3 December 2022 [Page 61]
Internet-Draft NSF-Facing Interface YANG Data Model June 2022
"The names of the rules to be grouped.";
}
leaf enable {
type boolean;
description
"If true, the rule is enabled and enforced.
If false, the rule is configured but disabled
and not enforced.";
}
leaf description {
type string;
description
"This is a description for rule-group";
}
}
}
}
}
<CODE ENDS>
Figure 5: YANG Data Module of I2NSF NSF-Facing-Interface
5. XML Configuration Examples of Low-Level Security Policy Rules
This section shows XML configuration examples of low-level security
policy rules that are delivered from the Security Controller to NSFs
over the NSF-Facing Interface. For security requirements, we assume
that the NSFs (i.e., General firewall, Time-based firewall, URL
filter, VoIP/VoCN filter, and HTTP and HTTPS flood mitigation)
described in Appendix A of [I-D.ietf-i2nsf-capability-data-model] are
registered with the I2NSF framework. With the registered NSFs, we
show configuration examples for security policy rules of network
security functions according to the following three security
requirements: (i) Block Social Networking Service (SNS) access during
business hours, (ii) Block malicious VoIP/VoCN packets coming to the
company, and (iii) Mitigate HTTP and HTTPS flood attacks on company
web server.
5.1. Example Security Requirement 1: Block Social Networking Service
(SNS) Access during Business Hours
This section shows a configuration example for blocking SNS access
during business hours in IPv4 networks or IPv6 networks.
Kim, et al. Expires 3 December 2022 [Page 62]
Internet-Draft NSF-Facing Interface YANG Data Model June 2022
<i2nsf-security-policy
xmlns="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-i2nsf-nsf-facing-interface">
<name>sns_access</name>
<rules>
<name>block_sns_access_during_operation_time_for_ipv4</name>
<condition>
<ipv4>
<source-ipv4-network>192.0.2.0/24</source-ipv4-network>
</ipv4>
<context>
<time>
<start-date-time>2021-03-11T09:00:00.00Z</start-date-time>
<end-date-time>2021-12-31T18:00:00.00Z</end-date-time>
<period>
<start-time>09:00:00Z</start-time>
<end-time>18:00:00Z</end-time>
<day>monday</day>
<day>tuesday</day>
<day>wednesday</day>
<day>thursday</day>
<day>friday</day>
</period>
<frequency>weekly</frequency>
</time>
</context>
</condition>
<action>
<advanced-action>
<content-security-control>
url-filtering
</content-security-control>
</advanced-action>
</action>
</rules>
</i2nsf-security-policy>
Figure 6: Configuration XML for Time-based Firewall to Block SNS
Access during Business Hours in IPv4 Networks
Kim, et al. Expires 3 December 2022 [Page 63]
Internet-Draft NSF-Facing Interface YANG Data Model June 2022
<i2nsf-security-policy
xmlns="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-i2nsf-nsf-facing-interface">
<name>sns_access</name>
<rules>
<name>block_sns_access_during_operation_time_for_ipv6</name>
<condition>
<ipv6>
<source-ipv6-network>2001:db8:1::/60</source-ipv6-network>
</ipv6>
<context>
<time>
<start-date-time>2021-03-11T09:00:00.00Z</start-date-time>
<end-date-time>2021-12-31T18:00:00.00Z</end-date-time>
<period>
<start-time>09:00:00Z</start-time>
<end-time>18:00:00Z</end-time>
<day>monday</day>
<day>tuesday</day>
<day>wednesday</day>
<day>thursday</day>
<day>friday</day>
</period>
<frequency>weekly</frequency>
</time>
</context>
</condition>
<action>
<advanced-action>
<content-security-control>
url-filtering
</content-security-control>
</advanced-action>
</action>
</rules>
</i2nsf-security-policy>
Figure 7: Configuration XML for Time-based Firewall to Block SNS
Access during Business Hours in IPv6 Networks
Kim, et al. Expires 3 December 2022 [Page 64]
Internet-Draft NSF-Facing Interface YANG Data Model June 2022
<i2nsf-security-policy
xmlns="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-i2nsf-nsf-facing-interface">
<name>sns_access</name>
<rules>
<name>block_sns_access_during_operation_time</name>
<condition>
<url-category>
<user-defined>SNS_1</user-defined>
<user-defined>SNS_2</user-defined>
</url-category>
</condition>
<action>
<packet-action>
<egress-action>drop</egress-action>
</packet-action>
</action>
</rules>
</i2nsf-security-policy>
Figure 8: Configuration XML for Web Filter to Block SNS Access
during Business Hours
Figure 6 and Figure 7 show the configuration XML documents for a
time-based firewall for IPv4 and IPv6, respectively. Figure 8 shows
the configuration XML document for a web filter. The two NSFs
combined to block SNS access during business hours in IPv4 networks
(or IPv6 networks). For the security requirement, two NSFs (i.e., a
time-based firewall and a web filter) were used because one NSF
cannot meet the security requirement. The instances of XML documents
for the time-based firewall and the web filter are as follows: Note
that a detailed data model for the configuration of the advanced
network security function (i.e., web filter) can be defined as an
extension in future.
Time-based Firewall is as follows:
1. The name of the security policy is sns_access.
2. The name of the rule is
block_sns_access_during_operation_time_for_ipv4 and
block_sns_access_during_operation_time_for_ipv6.
3. The rule is started from 2021-03-11 at 9 a.m. to 2021-12-31 at 6
p.m.
4. The rule is operated weekly every weekday (i.e., Monday, Tuesday,
Wednesday, Thursday, and Friday) during the business hours (i.e.,
from 9 a.m. to 6 p.m.).
Kim, et al. Expires 3 December 2022 [Page 65]
Internet-Draft NSF-Facing Interface YANG Data Model June 2022
5. The rule inspects a source IPv4 address (i.e., 192.0.2.0/24).
For the case of IPv6 networks, the rule inspects a source IPv6
address (i.e., from 2001:db8:1::/60).
6. If the outgoing packets match the rules above, the time-based
firewall sends the packets to url filtering for additional
inspection because the time-based firewall can not inspect
contents of the packets for the SNS URL.
Web Filter is as follows:
1. The name of the security policy is sns_access.
2. The name of the rule is block_SNS_1_and_SNS_2.
3. The rule inspects URL address to block the access packets to the
SNS_1 or the SNS_2.
4. If the outgoing packets match the rules above, the packets are
blocked.
5.2. Example Security Requirement 2: Block Malicious VoIP/VoCN Packets
Coming to a Company
This section shows a configuration example for blocking malicious
VoIP/VoCN packets coming to a company.
Kim, et al. Expires 3 December 2022 [Page 66]
Internet-Draft NSF-Facing Interface YANG Data Model June 2022
<i2nsf-security-policy
xmlns="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-i2nsf-nsf-facing-interface">
<name>voip_vocn_inspection</name>
<rules>
<name>block_malicious_voice_id</name>
<condition>
<ipv4>
<destination-ipv4-network>192.0.2.0/24</destination-ipv4-network>
</ipv4>
<tcp>
<destination-port-number>
<lower-port>5060</lower-port>
<upper-port>5061</upper-port>
</destination-port-number>
</tcp>
</condition>
<action>
<advanced-action>
<content-security-control>
voip-vocn-filtering
</content-security-control>
</advanced-action>
</action>
</rules>
</i2nsf-security-policy>
Figure 9: Configuration XML for General Firewall to Block
Malicious VoIP/VoCN Packets Coming to a Company
Kim, et al. Expires 3 December 2022 [Page 67]
Internet-Draft NSF-Facing Interface YANG Data Model June 2022
<i2nsf-security-policy
xmlns="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-i2nsf-nsf-facing-interface">
<name>voip_vocn_inspection</name>
<rules>
<name>block_malicious_voice_id</name>
<condition>
<voice>
<source-voice-id>
user1@voip.malicious.example.com
</source-voice-id>
<source-voice-id>
user2@voip.malicious.example.com
</source-voice-id>
</voice>
</condition>
<action>
<flow-action>
<ingress-action>drop</ingress-action>
</flow-action>
</action>
</rules>
</i2nsf-security-policy>
Figure 10: Configuration XML for VoIP/VoCN Filter to Block
Malicious VoIP/VoCN Packets Coming to a Company
Figure 9 and Figure 10 show the configuration XML documents for
general firewall and VoIP/VoCN filter to block malicious VoIP/VoCN
packets coming to a company. For the security requirement, two NSFs
(i.e., a general firewall and a VoIP/VoCN filter) were used because
one NSF can not meet the security requirement. The instances of XML
documents for the general firewall and the VoIP/VoCN filter are as
follows: Note that a detailed data model for the configuration of the
advanced network security function (i.e., VoIP/VoCN filter) can be
described as an extension in future.
General Firewall is as follows:
1. The name of the security policy is voip_vocn_inspection.
2. The name of the rule is block_malicious_voice_id.
3. The rule inspects a destination IPv4 address (i.e., from
192.0.2.0/24).
4. The rule inspects a port number (i.e., 5060 and 5061) to inspect
VoIP/VoCN packet.
Kim, et al. Expires 3 December 2022 [Page 68]
Internet-Draft NSF-Facing Interface YANG Data Model June 2022
5. If the incoming packets match the rules above, the general
firewall sends the packets to VoIP/VoCN filter for additional
inspection because the general firewall can not inspect contents
of the VoIP/VoCN packets.
VoIP/VoCN Filter is as follows:
1. The name of the security policy is malicious_voice_id.
2. The name of the rule is block_malicious_voice_id.
3. The rule inspects the voice ID of the VoIP/VoCN packets to block
the malicious VoIP/VoCN packets (i.e.,
user1@voip.malicious.example.com and
user2@voip.malicious.example.com).
4. If the incoming packets match the rules above, the packets are
blocked.
5.3. Example Security Requirement 3: Mitigate HTTP and HTTPS Flood
Attacks on a Company Web Server
This section shows a configuration example for mitigating HTTP and
HTTPS flood attacks on a company web server.
Kim, et al. Expires 3 December 2022 [Page 69]
Internet-Draft NSF-Facing Interface YANG Data Model June 2022
<i2nsf-security-policy
xmlns="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-i2nsf-nsf-facing-interface">
<name>flood_attack_mitigation</name>
<rules>
<name>mitigate_http_and_https_flood_attack</name>
<condition>
<ipv4>
<destination-ipv4-network>192.0.2.0/24</destination-ipv4-network>
</ipv4>
<tcp>
<destination-port-number>
<port-numbers>
<start>80</start>
<end>80</end>
</port-numbers>
<port-numbers>
<start>443</start>
<end>443</end>
</port-numbers>
</destination-port-number>
</tcp>
</condition>
<action>
<advanced-action>
<attack-mitigation-control>
anti-ddos
</attack-mitigation-control>
</advanced-action>
</action>
</rules>
</i2nsf-security-policy>
Figure 11: Configuration XML for General Firewall to Mitigate
HTTP and HTTPS Flood Attacks on a Company Web Server
Kim, et al. Expires 3 December 2022 [Page 70]
Internet-Draft NSF-Facing Interface YANG Data Model June 2022
<i2nsf-security-policy
xmlns="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-i2nsf-nsf-facing-interface">
<name>flood_attack_mitigation</name>
<rules>
<name>mitigate_http_and_https_flood_attack</name>
<condition>
<ddos>
<alert-packet-rate>1000</alert-packet-rate>
</ddos>
</condition>
<action>
<flow-action>
<ingress-action>drop</ingress-action>
</flow-action>
</action>
</rules>
</i2nsf-security-policy>
Figure 12: Configuration XML for Anti-DDoS to Mitigate HTTP and
HTTPS Flood Attacks on a Company Web Server
Figure 11 and Figure 12 show the configuration XML documents for
general firewall and HTTP and HTTPS flood attack mitigation to
mitigate HTTP and HTTPS flood attacks on a company web server. For
the security requirement, two NSFs (i.e., a general firewall and a
HTTP and HTTPS flood attack mitigation) were used because one NSF can
not meet the security requirement. The instances of XML documents
for the general firewall and HTTP and HTTPS flood attack mitigation
are as follows: Note that a detailed data model for the configuration
of the advanced network security function (i.e., HTTP and HTTPS flood
attack mitigation) can be defined as an extension in future.
General Firewall is as follows:
1. The name of the security policy is flood_attack_mitigation.
2. The name of the rule is mitigate_http_and_https_flood_attack.
3. The rule inspects a destination IPv4 address (i.e., 192.0.2.0/24)
to inspect the access packets coming into the company web server.
4. The rule inspects a port number (i.e., 80 and 443) to inspect
HTTP and HTTPS packet.
5. If the packets match the rules above, the general firewall sends
the packets to anti-DDoS for additional inspection because the
general firewall can not control the amount of packets for HTTP
and HTTPS packets.
Kim, et al. Expires 3 December 2022 [Page 71]
Internet-Draft NSF-Facing Interface YANG Data Model June 2022
Anti DDoS for HTTP and HTTPS Flood Attack Mitigation is as follows:
1. The name of the security policy is flood_attack_mitigation.
2. The name of the rule is mitigate_http_and_https_flood_attack.
3. The rule controls the HTTTP and HTTPS packets according to the
amount of incoming packets (1000 packets per second).
4. If the incoming packets match the rules above, the packets are
blocked.
6. IANA Considerations
This document requests IANA to register the following URI in the
"IETF XML Registry" [RFC3688]:
URI: urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-i2nsf-nsf-facing-interface
Registrant Contact: The IESG.
XML: N/A; the requested URI is an XML namespace.
This document requests IANA to register the following YANG module in
the "YANG Module Names" registry [RFC7950][RFC8525]:
name: ietf-i2nsf-nsf-facing-interface
namespace: urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-i2nsf-nsf-facing-interface
prefix: i2nsfnfi
reference: RFC XXXX
7. Security Considerations
The YANG module specified in this document defines a data schema
designed to be accessed through network management protocols such as
NETCONF [RFC6241] or RESTCONF [RFC8040]. The lowest NETCONF layer is
the secure transport layer, and the required secure transport is
Secure Shell (SSH) [RFC6242]. The lowest RESTCONF layer is HTTPS,
and the required secure transport is TLS [RFC8446].
The NETCONF access control model [RFC8341] provides a means of
restricting access to specific NETCONF or RESTCONF users to a
preconfigured subset of all available NETCONF or RESTCONF protocol
operations and content.
There are a number of data nodes defined in this YANG module that are
writable/creatable/deletable (i.e., config true, which is the
default). These data nodes may be considered sensitive or vulnerable
Kim, et al. Expires 3 December 2022 [Page 72]
Internet-Draft NSF-Facing Interface YANG Data Model June 2022
in some network environments. Write operations (e.g., edit-config)
to these data nodes without proper protection can have a negative
effect on network operations. These are the subtrees and data nodes
and their sensitivity/vulnerability:
* ietf-i2nsf-nsf-facing-interface: Writing to almost any element of
this YANG module would directly impact on the configuration of
NSFs, e.g., completely turning off security monitoring and
mitigation capabilities; altering the scope of this monitoring and
mitigation; creating an overwhelming logging volume to overwhelm
downstream analytics or storage capacity; creating logging
patterns which are confusing; or rendering useless trained
statistics or artificial intelligence models.
Some of the readable data nodes in this YANG module may be considered
sensitive or vulnerable in some network environments. It is thus
important to control read access (e.g., via get, get-config, or
notification) to these data nodes. These are the subtrees and data
nodes and their sensitivity/vulnerability:
* ietf-i2nsf-nsf-facing-interface: The attacker may gather the
security policy information of any target NSFs and misuse the
security policy information for subsequent attacks.
Policy rules identifying the specified users and user groups can be
specified with "rules/condition/context/users". As with other data
in this YANG module, this user information is provided by the
Security Controller to the NSFs and is protected via the transport
and access control mechanisms described above.
8. References
8.1. Normative References
[RFC0768] Postel, J., "User Datagram Protocol", STD 6, RFC 768,
DOI 10.17487/RFC0768, August 1980,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc768>.
[RFC0791] Postel, J., "Internet Protocol", STD 5, RFC 791,
DOI 10.17487/RFC0791, September 1981,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc791>.
[RFC0792] Postel, J., "Internet Control Message Protocol", STD 5,
RFC 792, DOI 10.17487/RFC0792, September 1981,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc792>.
Kim, et al. Expires 3 December 2022 [Page 73]
Internet-Draft NSF-Facing Interface YANG Data Model June 2022
[RFC0854] Postel, J. and J. Reynolds, "Telnet Protocol
Specification", STD 8, RFC 854, DOI 10.17487/RFC0854, May
1983, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc854>.
[RFC0959] Postel, J. and J. Reynolds, "File Transfer Protocol",
STD 9, RFC 959, DOI 10.17487/RFC0959, October 1985,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc959>.
[RFC1939] Myers, J. and M. Rose, "Post Office Protocol - Version 3",
STD 53, RFC 1939, DOI 10.17487/RFC1939, May 1996,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc1939>.
[RFC2119] Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate
Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119,
DOI 10.17487/RFC2119, March 1997,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc2119>.
[RFC2132] Alexander, S. and R. Droms, "DHCP Options and BOOTP Vendor
Extensions", RFC 2132, DOI 10.17487/RFC2132, March 1997,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc2132>.
[RFC2595] Newman, C., "Using TLS with IMAP, POP3 and ACAP",
RFC 2595, DOI 10.17487/RFC2595, June 1999,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc2595>.
[RFC3261] Rosenberg, J., Schulzrinne, H., Camarillo, G., Johnston,
A., Peterson, J., Sparks, R., Handley, M., and E.
Schooler, "SIP: Session Initiation Protocol", RFC 3261,
DOI 10.17487/RFC3261, June 2002,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc3261>.
[RFC3688] Mealling, M., "The IETF XML Registry", BCP 81, RFC 3688,
DOI 10.17487/RFC3688, January 2004,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc3688>.
[RFC3986] Berners-Lee, T., Fielding, R., and L. Masinter, "Uniform
Resource Identifier (URI): Generic Syntax", STD 66,
RFC 3986, DOI 10.17487/RFC3986, January 2005,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc3986>.
[RFC4250] Lehtinen, S. and C. Lonvick, Ed., "The Secure Shell (SSH)
Protocol Assigned Numbers", RFC 4250,
DOI 10.17487/RFC4250, January 2006,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc4250>.
Kim, et al. Expires 3 December 2022 [Page 74]
Internet-Draft NSF-Facing Interface YANG Data Model June 2022
[RFC4340] Kohler, E., Handley, M., and S. Floyd, "Datagram
Congestion Control Protocol (DCCP)", RFC 4340,
DOI 10.17487/RFC4340, March 2006,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc4340>.
[RFC4443] Conta, A., Deering, S., and M. Gupta, Ed., "Internet
Control Message Protocol (ICMPv6) for the Internet
Protocol Version 6 (IPv6) Specification", STD 89,
RFC 4443, DOI 10.17487/RFC4443, March 2006,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc4443>.
[RFC5321] Klensin, J., "Simple Mail Transfer Protocol", RFC 5321,
DOI 10.17487/RFC5321, October 2008,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc5321>.
[RFC5595] Fairhurst, G., "The Datagram Congestion Control Protocol
(DCCP) Service Codes", RFC 5595, DOI 10.17487/RFC5595,
September 2009, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc5595>.
[RFC5646] Phillips, A., Ed. and M. Davis, Ed., "Tags for Identifying
Languages", BCP 47, RFC 5646, DOI 10.17487/RFC5646,
September 2009, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc5646>.
[RFC6020] Bjorklund, M., Ed., "YANG - A Data Modeling Language for
the Network Configuration Protocol (NETCONF)", RFC 6020,
DOI 10.17487/RFC6020, October 2010,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc6020>.
[RFC6241] Enns, R., Ed., Bjorklund, M., Ed., Schoenwaelder, J., Ed.,
and A. Bierman, Ed., "Network Configuration Protocol
(NETCONF)", RFC 6241, DOI 10.17487/RFC6241, June 2011,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc6241>.
[RFC6242] Wasserman, M., "Using the NETCONF Protocol over Secure
Shell (SSH)", RFC 6242, DOI 10.17487/RFC6242, June 2011,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc6242>.
[RFC6335] Cotton, M., Eggert, L., Touch, J., Westerlund, M., and S.
Cheshire, "Internet Assigned Numbers Authority (IANA)
Procedures for the Management of the Service Name and
Transport Protocol Port Number Registry", BCP 165,
RFC 6335, DOI 10.17487/RFC6335, August 2011,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc6335>.
[RFC6991] Schoenwaelder, J., Ed., "Common YANG Data Types",
RFC 6991, DOI 10.17487/RFC6991, July 2013,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc6991>.
Kim, et al. Expires 3 December 2022 [Page 75]
Internet-Draft NSF-Facing Interface YANG Data Model June 2022
[RFC7950] Bjorklund, M., Ed., "The YANG 1.1 Data Modeling Language",
RFC 7950, DOI 10.17487/RFC7950, August 2016,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7950>.
[RFC8040] Bierman, A., Bjorklund, M., and K. Watsen, "RESTCONF
Protocol", RFC 8040, DOI 10.17487/RFC8040, January 2017,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8040>.
[RFC8075] Castellani, A., Loreto, S., Rahman, A., Fossati, T., and
E. Dijk, "Guidelines for Mapping Implementations: HTTP to
the Constrained Application Protocol (CoAP)", RFC 8075,
DOI 10.17487/RFC8075, February 2017,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8075>.
[RFC8174] Leiba, B., "Ambiguity of Uppercase vs Lowercase in RFC
2119 Key Words", BCP 14, RFC 8174, DOI 10.17487/RFC8174,
May 2017, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8174>.
[RFC8200] Deering, S. and R. Hinden, "Internet Protocol, Version 6
(IPv6) Specification", STD 86, RFC 8200,
DOI 10.17487/RFC8200, July 2017,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8200>.
[RFC8329] Lopez, D., Lopez, E., Dunbar, L., Strassner, J., and R.
Kumar, "Framework for Interface to Network Security
Functions", RFC 8329, DOI 10.17487/RFC8329, February 2018,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8329>.
[RFC8335] Bonica, R., Thomas, R., Linkova, J., Lenart, C., and M.
Boucadair, "PROBE: A Utility for Probing Interfaces",
RFC 8335, DOI 10.17487/RFC8335, February 2018,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8335>.
[RFC8340] Bjorklund, M. and L. Berger, Ed., "YANG Tree Diagrams",
BCP 215, RFC 8340, DOI 10.17487/RFC8340, March 2018,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8340>.
[RFC8341] Bierman, A. and M. Bjorklund, "Network Configuration
Access Control Model", STD 91, RFC 8341,
DOI 10.17487/RFC8341, March 2018,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8341>.
[RFC8342] Bjorklund, M., Schoenwaelder, J., Shafer, P., Watsen, K.,
and R. Wilton, "Network Management Datastore Architecture
(NMDA)", RFC 8342, DOI 10.17487/RFC8342, March 2018,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8342>.
Kim, et al. Expires 3 December 2022 [Page 76]
Internet-Draft NSF-Facing Interface YANG Data Model June 2022
[RFC8407] Bierman, A., "Guidelines for Authors and Reviewers of
Documents Containing YANG Data Models", BCP 216, RFC 8407,
DOI 10.17487/RFC8407, October 2018,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8407>.
[RFC8446] Rescorla, E., "The Transport Layer Security (TLS) Protocol
Version 1.3", RFC 8446, DOI 10.17487/RFC8446, August 2018,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8446>.
[RFC8519] Jethanandani, M., Agarwal, S., Huang, L., and D. Blair,
"YANG Data Model for Network Access Control Lists (ACLs)",
RFC 8519, DOI 10.17487/RFC8519, March 2019,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8519>.
[RFC8525] Bierman, A., Bjorklund, M., Schoenwaelder, J., Watsen, K.,
and R. Wilton, "YANG Library", RFC 8525,
DOI 10.17487/RFC8525, March 2019,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8525>.
[RFC9051] Melnikov, A., Ed. and B. Leiba, Ed., "Internet Message
Access Protocol (IMAP) - Version 4rev2", RFC 9051,
DOI 10.17487/RFC9051, August 2021,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc9051>.
[I-D.ietf-httpbis-http2bis]
Thomson, M. and C. Benfield, "HTTP/2", Work in Progress,
Internet-Draft, draft-ietf-httpbis-http2bis-07, 24 January
2022, <https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-httpbis-
http2bis-07.txt>.
[I-D.ietf-httpbis-messaging]
Fielding, R. T., Nottingham, M., and J. Reschke,
"HTTP/1.1", Work in Progress, Internet-Draft, draft-ietf-
httpbis-messaging-19, 12 September 2021,
<https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-httpbis-
messaging-19.txt>.
[I-D.ietf-httpbis-semantics]
Fielding, R. T., Nottingham, M., and J. Reschke, "HTTP
Semantics", Work in Progress, Internet-Draft, draft-ietf-
httpbis-semantics-19, 12 September 2021,
<https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-httpbis-
semantics-19.txt>.
Kim, et al. Expires 3 December 2022 [Page 77]
Internet-Draft NSF-Facing Interface YANG Data Model June 2022
[I-D.ietf-i2nsf-capability-data-model]
Hares, S., Jeong, J. P., Kim, J. T., Moskowitz, R., and Q.
Lin, "I2NSF Capability YANG Data Model", Work in Progress,
Internet-Draft, draft-ietf-i2nsf-capability-data-model-32,
23 May 2022, <https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-
i2nsf-capability-data-model-32.txt>.
[I-D.ietf-i2nsf-nsf-monitoring-data-model]
Jeong, J. P., Lingga, P., Hares, S., Xia, L. F., and H.
Birkholz, "I2NSF NSF Monitoring Interface YANG Data
Model", Work in Progress, Internet-Draft, draft-ietf-
i2nsf-nsf-monitoring-data-model-19, 23 May 2022,
<https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-i2nsf-nsf-
monitoring-data-model-19.txt>.
[I-D.ietf-tcpm-rfc793bis]
Eddy, W. M., "Transmission Control Protocol (TCP)
Specification", Work in Progress, Internet-Draft, draft-
ietf-tcpm-rfc793bis-28, 7 March 2022,
<https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-tcpm-
rfc793bis-28.txt>.
[I-D.ietf-tsvwg-rfc4960-bis]
Stewart, R. R., Tüxen, M., and K. E. E. Nielsen, "Stream
Control Transmission Protocol", Work in Progress,
Internet-Draft, draft-ietf-tsvwg-rfc4960-bis-19, 5
February 2022, <https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-
ietf-tsvwg-rfc4960-bis-19.txt>.
8.2. Informative References
[RFC4732] Handley, M., Ed., Rescorla, E., Ed., and IAB, "Internet
Denial-of-Service Considerations", RFC 4732,
DOI 10.17487/RFC4732, December 2006,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc4732>.
[RFC4987] Eddy, W., "TCP SYN Flooding Attacks and Common
Mitigations", RFC 4987, DOI 10.17487/RFC4987, August 2007,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc4987>.
[RFC9000] Iyengar, J., Ed. and M. Thomson, Ed., "QUIC: A UDP-Based
Multiplexed and Secure Transport", RFC 9000,
DOI 10.17487/RFC9000, May 2021,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc9000>.
[RFC9179] Hopps, C., "A YANG Grouping for Geographic Locations",
RFC 9179, DOI 10.17487/RFC9179, February 2022,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc9179>.
Kim, et al. Expires 3 December 2022 [Page 78]
Internet-Draft NSF-Facing Interface YANG Data Model June 2022
[I-D.ietf-i2nsf-consumer-facing-interface-dm]
Jeong, J. P., Chung, C., Ahn, T., Kumar, R., and S. Hares,
"I2NSF Consumer-Facing Interface YANG Data Model", Work in
Progress, Internet-Draft, draft-ietf-i2nsf-consumer-
facing-interface-dm-20, 23 May 2022,
<https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-i2nsf-
consumer-facing-interface-dm-20.txt>.
[GLOB] "Linux Programmer's Manual - GLOB", 13 August 2020,
<https://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man7/glob.7.html>.
[ISO-3166] "Codes for the representation of names of countries and
their subdivisions", ISO 3166, September 2018,
<https://www.iso.org/iso-3166-country-codes.html>.
[IEEE-802.3]
Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, "IEEE
Standard for Ethernet", 2018,
<https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/8457469/>.
Appendix A. Acknowledgments
This document is a product by the I2NSF Working Group (WG) including
WG Chairs (i.e., Linda Dunbar and Yoav Nir) and Diego Lopez. This
document took advantage of the review and comments from the following
people: Roman Danyliw, Acee Lindem, Dan Romascanu (GenART), Yoshifumi
Nishida (TSVART), Kyle Rose (SecDir), Joe Clarke (OpsDir), and Tom
Petch. The authors sincerely appreciate their sincere efforts and
kind help.
This work was supported by Institute of Information & Communications
Technology Planning & Evaluation (IITP) grant funded by the Korea
MSIT (Ministry of Science and ICT) (R-20160222-002755, Cloud based
Security Intelligence Technology Development for the Customized
Security Service Provisioning). This work was supported in part by
the IITP (2020-0-00395, Standard Development of Blockchain based
Network Management Automation Technology).
Appendix B. Contributors
The following are co-authors of this document:
Patrick Lingga - Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering,
Sungkyunkwan University, 2066 Seobu-ro Jangan-gu, Suwon, Gyeonggi-do
16419, Republic of Korea, EMail: patricklink@skku.edu
Kim, et al. Expires 3 December 2022 [Page 79]
Internet-Draft NSF-Facing Interface YANG Data Model June 2022
Hyoungshick Kim - Department of Computer Science and Engineering,
Sungkyunkwan University, 2066 Seobu-ro Jangan-gu, Suwon, Gyeonggi-do
16419, Republic of Korea, EMail: hyoung@skku.edu
Daeyoung Hyun - Department of Computer Science and Engineering,
Sungkyunkwan University, 2066 Seobu-ro Jangan-gu, Suwon, Gyeonggi-do
16419, Republic of Korea, EMail: dyhyun@skku.edu
Dongjin Hong - Department of Electronic, Electrical and Computer
Engineering, Sungkyunkwan University, 2066 Seobu-ro Jangan-gu, Suwon,
Gyeonggi-do 16419, Republic of Korea, EMail: dong.jin@skku.edu
Liang Xia - Huawei, 101 Software Avenue, Nanjing, Jiangsu 210012,
China, EMail: Frank.Xialiang@huawei.com
Tae-Jin Ahn - Korea Telecom, 70 Yuseong-Ro, Yuseong-Gu, Daejeon,
305-811, Republic of Korea, EMail: taejin.ahn@kt.com
Se-Hui Lee - Korea Telecom, 70 Yuseong-Ro, Yuseong-Gu, Daejeon,
305-811, Republic of Korea, EMail: sehuilee@kt.com
Appendix C. Changes from draft-ietf-i2nsf-nsf-facing-interface-dm-28
The following changes are made from draft-ietf-i2nsf-nsf-facing-
interface-dm-28:
* This version updated a 'leaf language' pattern by adding extra
parentheses around "[A-Za-z]{2,3}(-[A-Za-z]{3}(-[A-Za-
z]{3}){0,2})?" and removing a range character '-' between
characters 'Y' and 'Z' in "|([0-9][A-Za-z0-9]{3})))*(-[0-9A-WY-Za-
wy-z]" as 'Y' is alphabetically adjacent to 'Z'.
Authors' Addresses
Jinyong Tim Kim (editor)
Department of Electronic, Electrical and Computer Engineering
Sungkyunkwan University
2066 Seobu-Ro, Jangan-Gu
Suwon
Gyeonggi-Do
16419
Republic of Korea
Phone: +82 10 8273 0930
Email: timkim@skku.edu
Kim, et al. Expires 3 December 2022 [Page 80]
Internet-Draft NSF-Facing Interface YANG Data Model June 2022
Jaehoon Paul Jeong (editor)
Department of Computer Science and Engineering
Sungkyunkwan University
2066 Seobu-Ro, Jangan-Gu
Suwon
Gyeonggi-Do
16419
Republic of Korea
Phone: +82 31 299 4957
Email: pauljeong@skku.edu
URI: http://iotlab.skku.edu/people-jaehoon-jeong.php
Jung-Soo Park
Electronics and Telecommunications Research Institute
218 Gajeong-Ro, Yuseong-Gu
Daejeon
34129
Republic of Korea
Phone: +82 42 860 6514
Email: pjs@etri.re.kr
Susan Hares
Huawei
7453 Hickory Hill
Saline, MI 48176
United States of America
Phone: +1-734-604-0332
Email: shares@ndzh.com
Qiushi Lin
Huawei
Huawei Industrial Base
Shenzhen
Guangdong 518129,
China
Email: linqiushi@huawei.com
Kim, et al. Expires 3 December 2022 [Page 81]
