Internet DRAFT - draft-ietf-idr-deprecate-30-31-129
draft-ietf-idr-deprecate-30-31-129
IDR J. Snijders
Internet-Draft NTT
Intended status: Standards Track December 29, 2016
Expires: July 2, 2017
Deprecation of BGP Path Attribute values 30, 31, 129, 241, 242, and 243
draft-ietf-idr-deprecate-30-31-129-02
Abstract
This document requests IANA to mark BGP path attribute values 30, 31,
129, 241, 242, and 243 as "deprecated".
Status of This Memo
This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the
provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79.
Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering
Task Force (IETF). Note that other groups may also distribute
working documents as Internet-Drafts. The list of current Internet-
Drafts is at http://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/.
Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months
and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any
time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference
material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."
This Internet-Draft will expire on July 2, 2017.
Copyright Notice
Copyright (c) 2016 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the
document authors. All rights reserved.
This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal
Provisions Relating to IETF Documents
(http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of
publication of this document. Please review these documents
carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect
to this document. Code Components extracted from this document must
include Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of
the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as
described in the Simplified BSD License.
Snijders Expires July 2, 2017 [Page 1]
Internet-Draft Deprecation Of Squatted BGP Path Attributes December 2016
Table of Contents
1. Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
2. IANA Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
3. Security Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
4. Informative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
Appendix A. Acknowledgements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
Author's Address . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
1. Introduction
It has been discovered that certain BGP Path Attribute values have
been used in BGP implementations which have been deployed in the wild
while not being assigned by the IANA for such usage. Unregistered
usage of BGP Path Attribute values can lead to deployment problems
for new technologies.
The use of these unregistered values was noticed when BGP Large
Communities attribute [I-D.ietf-idr-large-community] was initially
assigned value 30 by IANA. It was subsequently discovered that a
widely-deployed BGP-4 [RFC4271] implementation had released code
which used path attribute 30 and which applied a "Treat-as-withdraw"
[RFC7606] strategy to routes containing a valid Large Community
attribute, since it was expecting a different data structure.
Because these routes were dropped, early adopters of Large
Communities were unreachable from parts of the Internet. As a
workaround, a new Early IANA Allocation was requested.
The squatting of values 30, 31, 129, 241, 242 and 243 has been
confirmed by the involved vendors or through source code review.
2. IANA Considerations
Per this document, IANA is requested to mark values 30, 31, 129, 241,
242, and 243 as "deprecated" in the "BGP Path Attributes" registry
under the "Border Gateway Protocol (BGP) Parameters" group. The
marking "deprecated" meaning "use is not recommended"
([I-D.leiba-cotton-iana-5226bis]).
3. Security Considerations
There are no meaningful security consequences arising from this
registry update.
Snijders Expires July 2, 2017 [Page 2]
Internet-Draft Deprecation Of Squatted BGP Path Attributes December 2016
4. Informative References
[I-D.ietf-idr-large-community]
Heitz, J., Snijders, J., Patel, K., Bagdonas, I., and N.
Hilliard, "BGP Large Communities", draft-ietf-idr-large-
community-11 (work in progress), December 2016.
[I-D.leiba-cotton-iana-5226bis]
Cotton, M., Leiba, B., and T. Narten, "Guidelines for
Writing an IANA Considerations Section in RFCs", draft-
leiba-cotton-iana-5226bis-18 (work in progress), September
2016.
[RFC4271] Rekhter, Y., Ed., Li, T., Ed., and S. Hares, Ed., "A
Border Gateway Protocol 4 (BGP-4)", RFC 4271,
DOI 10.17487/RFC4271, January 2006,
<http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc4271>.
[RFC7606] Chen, E., Ed., Scudder, J., Ed., Mohapatra, P., and K.
Patel, "Revised Error Handling for BGP UPDATE Messages",
RFC 7606, DOI 10.17487/RFC7606, August 2015,
<http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7606>.
Appendix A. Acknowledgements
The author would like to gratefully acknowledge Marlien Vijfhuizen
who helped discover the squatting of value 30, and Nick Hilliard for
editorial feedback.
Author's Address
Job Snijders
NTT Communications
Theodorus Majofskistraat 100
Amsterdam 1065 SZ
NL
Email: job@ntt.net
Snijders Expires July 2, 2017 [Page 3]