Internet DRAFT - draft-ietf-ipsecme-oob-pubkey
draft-ietf-ipsecme-oob-pubkey
IP Security Maintenance and Extensions (ipsecme) T. Kivinen
Internet-Draft INSIDE Secure
Updates: RFC 5996 (if approved) P. Wouters
Intended status: Standards Track Red Hat
Expires: October 10, 2013 H. Tschofenig
Nokia Siemens Networks
April 08, 2013
More Raw Public Keys for IKEv2
draft-ietf-ipsecme-oob-pubkey-00.txt
Abstract
The Internet Key Exchange Version 2 (IKEv2) protocol currently only
supports raw RSA keys. In some environments it is useful to make use
of other types of public keys, such as those based on Elliptic Curve
Cryptography. This documents adds support for other types of raw
public keys to IKEv2 and obsoletes the old raw RSA key format.
Status of This Memo
This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the
provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79.
Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering
Task Force (IETF). Note that other groups may also distribute
working documents as Internet-Drafts. The list of current Internet-
Drafts is at http://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/.
Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months
and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any
time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference
material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."
This Internet-Draft will expire on October 10, 2013.
Copyright Notice
Copyright (c) 2013 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the
document authors. All rights reserved.
This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal
Provisions Relating to IETF Documents
(http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of
publication of this document. Please review these documents
carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect
to this document. Code Components extracted from this document must
Kivinen, et al. Expires October 10, 2013 [Page 1]
Internet-Draft More Raw Public Keys for IKEv2 April 2013
include Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of
the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as
described in the Simplified BSD License.
Table of Contents
1. Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
2. Terminology . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
3. Certificate Encoding Payload . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
4. Old Raw RSA Key Certificate Type . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
5. Security Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
6. IANA Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
7. Acknowledgements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
8. References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
8.1. Normative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
8.2. Informative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
Appendix A. Examples . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
Authors' Addresses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
1. Introduction
Secure DNS allows public keys to be associated with domain names for
usage with security protocols like Internet Key Exchange Version 2
(IKEv2) [RFC5996] and Transport Layer Security (TLS) but it relies on
extensions in those protocols to be specified.
IKEv2 already offers support for PKCS #1 encoded RSA keys, i.e., a
DER- encoded RSAPublicKey structure (see [RSA] and [RFC3447]). Other
raw public keys types are, however, not supported.
The TLS Out-of-Band Public Key Validation specification
([I-D.ietf-tls-oob-pubkey]) adds generic support for raw public keys
to TLS by re-using the SubjectPublicKeyInfo format from the X.509
Public Key Infrastructure Certificate profile [RFC5280].
This document is similar than the TLS Out-of-Band Public Key
Validation specification, and applies the concept to IKEv2 to support
all public key formats defined by PKIX. This approach also allows
future public key extensions to be supported without the need to
introduce further enhancements to IKEv2.
To support new types of public keys in IKEv2 the following changes
are needed:
o A new Certificate Encoding format needs to be defined for carrying
the SubjectPublicKeyInfo structure. Section 3 specifies this new
encoding format.
Kivinen, et al. Expires October 10, 2013 [Page 2]
Internet-Draft More Raw Public Keys for IKEv2 April 2013
o A new Certificate Encoding type needs to be allocated from the
IANA registry. Section 6 contains this request to IANA.
2. Terminology
The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT",
"SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this
document are to be interpreted as described in [RFC2119].
3. Certificate Encoding Payload
Section 3.6 of RFC 5996 defines the Certificate payload format as
shown in Figure 1.
1 2 3
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Next Payload |C| RESERVED | Payload Length |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Cert Encoding | |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ |
~ Certificate Data ~
| |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
Figure 1: Certificate Payload Format.
o Certificate Encoding (1 octet) - This field indicates the type of
certificate or certificate-related information contained in the
Certificate Data field.
Certificate Encoding Value
----------------------------------------------------
Raw Public Key TBD
o Certificate Data (variable length) - Actual encoding of the
certificate data. The type of certificate is indicated by the
Certificate Encoding field.
When the certificate encoding type 'Raw Public Key' is used then the
Certificate Data only contains the SubjectPublicKeyInfo part of the
PKIX certificate.
In the case of the Certificate Request payload the Certification
Authority field MUST be empty if the "Raw Public Key" certificate
encoding is used.
Kivinen, et al. Expires October 10, 2013 [Page 3]
Internet-Draft More Raw Public Keys for IKEv2 April 2013
Note, that we do follow public key processing rules of the section
1.2 of the Additional Algorithms and Identifiers for RSA Cryptography
for PKIX ([RFC4055]) even when the SubjectPublicKeyInfo is not part
of the certificate, but sent here. This means RSASSA-PSS and RSASSA-
PSS-params inside the SubjectPublicKeyInfo needs to followed.
4. Old Raw RSA Key Certificate Type
After this there would be two ways of sending Raw RSA public keys in
the IKEv2: The original IKEv2 mechanism (Raw RSA Key, encoding value
11), and the new format defined here. The old Raw RSA Key encoding
has not been widely used. The IKEv2 protocol already supports a
method to indicate what certificate encoding formats are supported,
i.e. a peer can send one or multiple Certificate Request payload
with the certificate encoding types it supports. From this list the
recipient can see what formats are supported and select one which is
used to send Certificate back.
Implementations conforming to this document MUST use the new format
defined here for the raw public keys, regardless of the key type.
This means that old Raw RSA Key encoding value 11 MUST NOT be used
for certificate or certificate request payloads.
Note, that recipients can simply process the old Raw RSA key
encodings just like any other unsupported or unknown certificate
encoding type, i.e. skip over it, recipients MUST NOT consider
receiving such payloads as fatal error (if other end sends such
payloads, it is completely possible that the peers do not have common
format for certificate encoding and the authentication will fail
because of that).
5. Security Considerations
An IKEv2 deployment using raw public keys needs to utilize an out-of-
band public key validation procedure to be confident in the
authenticity of the keys being used. One such mechanism is to use a
configuration mechanism for provisioning raw public keys into the
IKEv2 software. A suitable deployment is likely to be found with
smart objects. Yet another approach is to rely on secure DNS to
associate public keys to be associated with domain names using the
IPSECKEY DNS RRtype [RFC4025]. More information can be found in DNS-
Based Authentication of Named Entities (DANE) [RFC6394].
This document does not change the assumptions made by the IKEv2
specifications since "Raw RSA Key" support is already available in
IKEv2. This document only generalizes the raw public key support and
obsoletes the old "Raw RSA Key" format.
Kivinen, et al. Expires October 10, 2013 [Page 4]
Internet-Draft More Raw Public Keys for IKEv2 April 2013
6. IANA Considerations
This document allocates a new value from the IKEv2 Certificate
Encodings registry:
TBD Raw Public Key
This document also obsoletes the old value in the same registry, and
the entry for "Raw RSA Key" should be changed to:
11 Obsoleted (was Raw RSA Key)
7. Acknowledgements
This document copies parts from the similar TLS document
([I-D.ietf-tls-oob-pubkey]).
8. References
8.1. Normative References
[RFC2119] Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate
Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, March 1997.
[RFC5280] Cooper, D., Santesson, S., Farrell, S., Boeyen, S.,
Housley, R., and W. Polk, "Internet X.509 Public Key
Infrastructure Certificate and Certificate Revocation List
(CRL) Profile", RFC 5280, May 2008.
[RFC5996] Kaufman, C., Hoffman, P., Nir, Y., and P. Eronen,
"Internet Key Exchange Protocol Version 2 (IKEv2)", RFC
5996, September 2010.
8.2. Informative References
[I-D.ietf-tls-oob-pubkey]
Wouters, P., Tschofenig, H., Gilmore, J., Weiler, S., and
T. Kivinen, "Out-of-Band Public Key Validation for
Transport Layer Security (TLS)", draft-ietf-tls-oob-
pubkey-07 (work in progress), February 2013.
[RFC3447] Jonsson, J. and B. Kaliski, "Public-Key Cryptography
Standards (PKCS) #1: RSA Cryptography Specifications
Version 2.1", RFC 3447, February 2003.
Kivinen, et al. Expires October 10, 2013 [Page 5]
Internet-Draft More Raw Public Keys for IKEv2 April 2013
[RFC4025] Richardson, M., "A Method for Storing IPsec Keying
Material in DNS", RFC 4025, March 2005.
[RFC4055] Schaad, J., Kaliski, B., and R. Housley, "Additional
Algorithms and Identifiers for RSA Cryptography for use in
the Internet X.509 Public Key Infrastructure Certificate
and Certificate Revocation List (CRL) Profile", RFC 4055,
June 2005.
[RFC4754] Fu, D. and J. Solinas, "IKE and IKEv2 Authentication Using
the Elliptic Curve Digital Signature Algorithm (ECDSA)",
RFC 4754, January 2007.
[RFC5480] Turner, S., Brown, D., Yiu, K., Housley, R., and T. Polk,
"Elliptic Curve Cryptography Subject Public Key
Information", RFC 5480, March 2009.
[RFC6394] Barnes, R., "Use Cases and Requirements for DNS-Based
Authentication of Named Entities (DANE)", RFC 6394,
October 2011.
[RSA] R. Rivest, , A. Shamir, , and L. Adleman, "A Method for
Obtaining Digital Signatures and Public-Key
Cryptosystems", February 1978.
Appendix A. Examples
This appendix provides examples of the actual packets sent on the
wire. This uses the 256-bit ECDSA private/public key pair defined in
the section 8.1. of the IKEv2 ECDSA document [RFC4754].
The public key is as followed:
o Algorithm : id-ecPublicKey (1.2.840.10045.2.1)
o Fixed curve: secp256r1 (1.2.840.10045.3.1.7)
o Public key x coordinate : cb28e099 9b9c7715 fd0a80d8 e47a7707
9716cbbf 917dd72e 97566ea1 c066957c
o Public key y coordinate : 2b57c023 5fb74897 68d058ff 4911c20f
dbe71e36 99d91339 afbb903e e17255dc
The SubjectPublicKeyInfo ASN.1 object is as follows:
0000 : SEQUENCE
0002 : SEQUENCE
0004 : OBJECT IDENTIFIER id-ecPublicKey (1.2.840.10045.2.1)
Kivinen, et al. Expires October 10, 2013 [Page 6]
Internet-Draft More Raw Public Keys for IKEv2 April 2013
000d : OBJECT IDENTIFIER secp256r1 (1.2.840.10045.3.1.7)
0017 : BIT STRING (66 bytes)
00000000: 0004 cb28 e099 9b9c 7715 fd0a 80d8 e47a
00000010: 7707 9716 cbbf 917d d72e 9756 6ea1 c066
00000020: 957c 2b57 c023 5fb7 4897 68d0 58ff 4911
00000030: c20f dbe7 1e36 99d9 1339 afbb 903e e172
00000040: 55dc
The first byte (00) of the bit string indicates that there is no
"number of unused bits", and the second byte (04) indicates
uncompressed form ([RFC5480]). Those two octets are followed by the
values of X and Y.
The final encoded SubjectPublicKeyInfo object is as follows:
00000000: 3059 3013 0607 2a86 48ce 3d02 0106 082a
00000010: 8648 ce3d 0301 0703 4200 04cb 28e0 999b
00000020: 9c77 15fd 0a80 d8e4 7a77 0797 16cb bf91
00000030: 7dd7 2e97 566e a1c0 6695 7c2b 57c0 235f
00000040: b748 9768 d058 ff49 11c2 0fdb e71e 3699
00000050: d913 39af bb90 3ee1 7255 dc
This will result the final IKEv2 Certificate Payload to be:
00000000: NN00 0060 XX30 5930 1306 072a 8648 ce3d
00000010: 0201 0608 2a86 48ce 3d03 0107 0342 0004
00000020: cb28 e099 9b9c 7715 fd0a 80d8 e47a 7707
00000030: 9716 cbbf 917d d72e 9756 6ea1 c066 957c
00000040: 2b57 c023 5fb7 4897 68d0 58ff 4911 c20f
00000050: dbe7 1e36 99d9 1339 afbb 903e e172 55dc
Where the NN will be the next payload type (i.e. that value depends
on what is the next payload after this certificate payload).
Note to the RFC editor / IANA, replace the XX above with the newly
allocated Raw Public Key number, and remove this note.
Authors' Addresses
Kivinen, et al. Expires October 10, 2013 [Page 7]
Internet-Draft More Raw Public Keys for IKEv2 April 2013
Tero Kivinen
INSIDE Secure
Eerikinkatu 28
HELSINKI FI-00180
FI
Email: kivinen@iki.fi
Paul Wouters
Red Hat
Email: pwouters@redhat.com
Hannes Tschofenig
Nokia Siemens Networks
Linnoitustie 6
Espoo 02600
Finland
Phone: +358 (50) 4871445
Email: Hannes.Tschofenig@gmx.net
URI: http://www.tschofenig.priv.at
Kivinen, et al. Expires October 10, 2013 [Page 8]
