Internet DRAFT - draft-ietf-lpwan-schc-compound-ack
draft-ietf-lpwan-schc-compound-ack
lpwan Working Group JC. Zuniga
Internet-Draft Cisco
Updates: 8724, 9363 (if approved) C. Gomez
Intended status: Standards Track S. Aguilar
Expires: 7 October 2023 Universitat Politecnica de Catalunya
L. Toutain
IMT-Atlantique
S. Cespedes
Concordia University
D. Wistuba
NIC Labs, Universidad de Chile
5 April 2023
SCHC Compound ACK
draft-ietf-lpwan-schc-compound-ack-17
Abstract
The present document updates the SCHC (Static Context Header
Compression and fragmentation) protocol RFC8724 and the corresponding
Yang Module RFC9363. It defines a SCHC Compound ACK message format
and procedure, which are intended to reduce the number of response
transmissions (i.e., SCHC ACKs) in the ACK-on-Error mode, by
accumulating bitmaps of several windows in a single SCHC message
(i.e., the SCHC Compound ACK).
Both message format and procedure are generic, so they can be used,
for instance, by any of the four Low Power Wide Area Networks
(LPWANs) technologies defined in RFC8376, being Sigfox, LoRaWAN, NB-
IoT and IEEE 802.15.4w.
Status of This Memo
This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the
provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79.
Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering
Task Force (IETF). Note that other groups may also distribute
working documents as Internet-Drafts. The list of current Internet-
Drafts is at https://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/.
Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months
and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any
time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference
material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."
This Internet-Draft will expire on 7 October 2023.
Zuniga, et al. Expires 7 October 2023 [Page 1]
Internet-Draft SCHC Compound ACK April 2023
Copyright Notice
Copyright (c) 2023 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the
document authors. All rights reserved.
This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal
Provisions Relating to IETF Documents (https://trustee.ietf.org/
license-info) in effect on the date of publication of this document.
Please review these documents carefully, as they describe your rights
and restrictions with respect to this document. Code Components
extracted from this document must include Revised BSD License text as
described in Section 4.e of the Trust Legal Provisions and are
provided without warranty as described in the Revised BSD License.
Table of Contents
1. Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
2. Terminology . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
3. SCHC Compound ACK . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
3.1. SCHC Compound ACK Message Format . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
3.2. SCHC Compound ACK Behaviour . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
8.4.3. ACK-on-Error Mode . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
4. SCHC Compound ACK Example . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16
5. SCHC Compound ACK YANG Data Model . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17
5.1. SCHC YANG Data Model Extension . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17
5.2. SCHC YANG Tree Extension . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19
6. SCHC Compound ACK Parameters . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20
7. Security considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20
8. IANA Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21
8.1. URI Registration . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21
8.2. YANG Module Name Registration . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21
9. Acknowledgements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21
10. References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22
10.1. Normative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22
10.2. Informative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22
Authors' Addresses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22
1. Introduction
The Generic Framework for Static Context Header Compression and
Fragmentation (SCHC) specification [RFC8724] describes two
mechanisms: i) a protocol header compression scheme, and ii) a frame
fragmentation and loss recovery functionality. Either can be used on
top of radio technologies such as the four Low Power Wide Area
Networks (LPWANs) listed in [RFC8376], being Sigfox, LoRaWAN, NB-IoT
and IEEE 802.15.4w. These LPWANs have similar characteristics such
as star-oriented topologies, network architecture, connected devices
with built-in applications, etc.
Zuniga, et al. Expires 7 October 2023 [Page 2]
Internet-Draft SCHC Compound ACK April 2023
SCHC offers a great level of flexibility to accommodate all these
LPWAN technologies. Even though there are a great number of
similarities between them, some differences exist with respect to the
transmission characteristics, payload sizes, etc. Hence, there are
optimal parameters and modes of operation that can be used when SCHC
is used on top of a specific LPWAN technology.
In ACK-on-Error mode in [RFC8724] the SCHC Packet is fragmented into
pieces called tiles, with all tiles of the same size except for the
last one, which can be smaller. Successive tiles are grouped in
windows of fixed size. A SCHC Fragment carries one or several
contiguous tiles, which may span multiple windows. When sending all
tiles from all windows, the last tile is sent in an All-1 SCHC
Fragment. The SCHC receiver, after receiving the All-1 SCHC Fragment
will send a SCHC ACK reporting on the reception of exactly one window
of tiles. In case of SCHC Fragment losses, a bitmap is added to the
failure SCHC ACK, where each bit in the bitmap corresponds to a tile
in the window. If SCHC Fragment losses span multiple windows, the
SCHC receiver will send one failure SCHC ACK per window with losses.
The present document updates the SCHC protocol for frame
fragmentation and loss recovery. It defines a SCHC Compound ACK
format and procedure, which is intended to reduce the number of
response transmissions (i.e., SCHC ACKs) in the ACK-on-Error mode of
SCHC. The SCHC Compound ACK extends the failure SCHC ACK message
format so that it can contain several bitmaps, each bitmap being
identified by its corresponding window number. The SCHC Compound ACK
is backwards compatible with the SCHC ACK as defined in [RFC8724],
and introduces flexibility, as the receiver has the capability to
respond to the All-0 SCHC Fragment, providing more downlink
opportunities, and therefore adjusting to the delay requirements of
the application.
2. Terminology
The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT",
"SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "NOT RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and
"OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described in BCP
14 [RFC2119] [RFC8174] when, and only when, they appear in all
capitals, as shown here.
It is assumed that the reader is familiar with the terms and
mechanisms defined in [RFC8376] and in [RFC8724].
Zuniga, et al. Expires 7 October 2023 [Page 3]
Internet-Draft SCHC Compound ACK April 2023
3. SCHC Compound ACK
The SCHC Compound ACK is a failure SCHC ACK message that can contain
several bitmaps, each bitmap being identified by its corresponding
window number. In [RFC8724], the failure SCHC ACK message only
contain one bitmap corresponding to one window. The SCHC Compound
ACK extends this format allowing more windows to be acknowledged in a
single ACK, reducing the total number of failure SCHC ACK messages,
specially when fragment losses are present in intermediate windows.
The SCHC Compound ACK MAY be used in fragmentation modes that use
windows and that allow reporting the bitmaps of multiple windows at
the same time, and MUST NOT be used otherwise.
The SCHC Compound ACK:
* provides feedback only for windows with fragment losses,
* has a variable size that depends on the number of windows with
fragment losses being reported in the single Compound SCHC ACK,
* includes the window number (i.e., W) of each bitmap,
* might not cover all windows with fragment losses of a SCHC Packet,
* and is distinguishable from the SCHC Receiver-Abort.
3.1. SCHC Compound ACK Message Format
Figure 1 shows the success SCHC ACK format, i.e., when all fragments
have been correctly received (C=1), as defined in [RFC8724].
|-- SCHC ACK Header --|
|--T-|---M--| 1 |
+--------+----+------+---+~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
| RuleID |DTag| W |C=1| padding as needed
+--------+----+------+---+~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Figure 1: SCHC Success ACK message format, as defined in RFC8724
In case SCHC Fragment losses are found in any of the windows of the
SCHC Packet, the SCHC Compound ACK MAY be used. The SCHC Compound
ACK message format is shown in Figure 2 and Figure 3.
Zuniga, et al. Expires 7 October 2023 [Page 4]
Internet-Draft SCHC Compound ACK April 2023
|--- SCHC ACK Header --|- W=w1 -|...|---- W=wi -----|
|--T-|---M--|-1-| |...|---M--| |---M--|
+------+----+------+---+--------+...+------+--------+------+~~~~~+
|RuleID|DTag| W=w1 |C=0| Bitmap |...| W=wi | Bitmap |00..00| pad |
+------+----+------+---+--------+...+------+--------+------+~~~~~+
next L2 Word boundary ->|<-- L2 Word ->|
Losses are found in windows W = w1,...,wi; where w1<w2<...<wi
Figure 2: SCHC Compound ACK message format
The SCHC Compound ACK groups the window number (W) with its
corresponding bitmap. Window numbers do not need to be contiguous.
However, the window numbers and its corresponding bitmaps included in
the SCHC Compound ACK message MUST be ordered from the lowest-
numbered to the highest-numbered window. Hence, if the bitmap of
window number zero is present in the SCHC Compound ACK message, it
MUST always be the first one in order and its W number MUST be placed
in the SCHC ACK Header.
If M or more padding bits would be needed after the last bitmap in
the message to fill the last L2 Word, M bits at 0 MUST be appended
after the last bitmap, and then padding is applied as needed (see
Figure 2). Since window number 0, if present in the message, is
placed as w1, the M bits set to zero can't be confused with window
number 0, and therefore they signal the end of the SCHC Compound ACK
message.
Figure 3 shows the case when the required padding bits are strictly
less than M bits. In this case, the layer-2 MTU (Maximum
Transmission Unit) does not leave room for any extra window value,
let alone any bitmap, thereby signaling the end of the SCHC Compound
ACK message.
|--- SCHC ACK Header --|- W=w1 -|...|---- W=wi -----|
|--T-|---M--|-1-| |...|---M--| |---M--|
+------+----+------+---+--------+...+------+--------+~~~+
|RuleID|DTag| W=w1 |C=0| Bitmap |...| W=wi | Bitmap |pad|
+------+----+------+---+--------+...+------+--------+~~~+
next L2 Word boundary ->|
Losses are found in windows W = w1,...,wi; where w1<w2<...<wi
Figure 3: SCHC Compound ACK message format with less than M
padding bits
Zuniga, et al. Expires 7 October 2023 [Page 5]
Internet-Draft SCHC Compound ACK April 2023
The SCHC Compound ACK MUST NOT use the Compressed Bitmap format for
intermediate windows/bitmaps (i.e., bitmaps that are not the last one
of the SCHC Compound ACK message), and therefore intermediate bitmaps
fields MUST be of size WINDOW_SIZE. Hence, the SCHC Compound ACK MAY
use a Compressed Bitmap format only for the last bitmap in the
message. The optional usage of this Compressed Bitmap for the last
bitmap MUST be specified by the SCHC technology-specific profile.
The case where the last bitmap is effectively compressed corresponds
to Figure 3, with the last bitmap ending, by construction, on an L2
Word boundary, therefore resulting in no padding at all.
Figure 4 illustrates a bitmap compression example of a SCHC Compound
ACK, where the bitmap of the last window (wi) indicates that the
first tile has not been correctly received. Because the compression
algorithm resulted in effective compression, no padding is needed.
|--- SCHC ACK Header --|- W=w1 -|...|-------- W=wi -------|
|--T-|---M--|-1-| |...|---M--|
+------+----+------+---+--------+...+------+--------------+
|RuleID|DTag| W=w1 |C=0| Bitmap |...| W=wi |0 1 1 1 1 1 1 |
+------+----+------+---+--------+...+------+--------------+
next L2 Word boundary ->|
SCHC Compound ACK with uncompressed Bitmap
|--- SCHC ACK Header --|- W=w1 -|...|-- W=wi --|
|--T-|---M--|-1-| |...|---M--|
+------+----+------+---+--------+...+------+---+
|RuleID|DTag| W=w1 |C=0| Bitmap |...| W=wi |0 1|
+------+----+------+---+--------+...+------+---+
next L2 Word boundary ->|
Transmitted SCHC Compound ACK with compressed Bitmap
Losses are found in windows W = w1,...,wi; where w1<w2<...<wi
Figure 4: SCHC Compound ACK message format with compressed bitmap
Figure 5 illustrates another bitmap compression example of a SCHC
Compound ACK, where the bitmap of the last window (wi) indicates that
the second and the fourth tile have not been correctly received. In
this example, the compression algorithm does not result in effective
compression of the last bitmap. Besides, because more than M bits of
padding would be needed to fill the last L2 Word, M bits at 0 are
appended to the message before padding is applied.
Zuniga, et al. Expires 7 October 2023 [Page 6]
Internet-Draft SCHC Compound ACK April 2023
|--- SCHC ACK Header --|-W=w1-|...|-------- W=wi -------|
|--T-|---M--|-1-| |...|---M--|
+------+----+------+---+------+...+------+--------------+
|RuleID|DTag| W=w1 |C=0|Bitmap|...| W=wi |1 0 1 0 1 1 1 |
+------+----+------+---+------+...+------+--------------+
next L2 Word boundary ->|
SCHC Compound ACK with uncompressed Bitmap
|--- SCHC ACK Header --|-W=w1-|...|-------- W=wi -------|
|--T-|---M--|-1-| |...|---M--| |---M--|
+------+----+------+---+------+...+------+--------------+------+~~~+
|RuleID|DTag| W=w1 |C=0|Bitmap|...| W=wi |1 0 1 0 1 1 1 |00..00|pad|
+------+----+------+---+------+...+------+--------------+------+~~~+
next L2 Word boundary ->|<------ L2 Word ------>|
Transmitted SCHC Compound ACK
Losses are found in windows W = w1,...,wi; where w1<w2<...<wi
Figure 5: SCHC Compound ACK message format with compressed bitmap
If a SCHC sender gets a SCHC Compound ACK with invalid W's, such as
duplicate W values or W values not sent yet, it MUST discard the
whole SCHC Compound ACK message.
Note: because it has a C bit reset to 0, the SCHC Compound ACK is
distinguishable from the Receiver-Abort message [RFC8724], which has
a C bit set to 1.
3.2. SCHC Compound ACK Behaviour
The SCHC ACK-on-Error behaviour is described in section 8.4.3 of
[RFC8724]. The present document slightly modifies this behaviour,
since in the baseline SCHC specification a SCHC ACK reports only one
bitmap for the reception of exactly one window of tiles. The present
SCHC Compound ACK specification extends the SCHC ACK message format
so that it can contain several bitmaps, each bitmap being identified
by its corresponding window number.
The SCHC ACK format, as presented in [RFC8724], can be considered a
special SCHC Compound ACK case, in which it reports only the tiles of
one window. Therefore, the SCHC Compound ACK is backwards compatible
with the SCHC ACK format presented in [RFC8724]. The receiver can
suspect if the sender does not support the SCHC Compound ACK, if the
sender does not resend any tiles from windows that are not the first
one in the SCHC Compound ACK and more ACKs are needed. In that case,
the receiver can send SCHC Compound ACKs with only one window of
tiles.
Zuniga, et al. Expires 7 October 2023 [Page 7]
Internet-Draft SCHC Compound ACK April 2023
Also, some flexibility is introduced with respect to [RFC8724], in
that the receiver has the capability to respond to the All-0 with a
SCHC Compound ACK or not, depending on certain parameters, like
network conditions, sender buffer/chache size, supported application
delay. Note that even though the protocol allows for such
flexibility, the actual decision criteria is not specified in this
document. The application MUST set expiration timer values according
to when the feedback is expected to be received, e.g., after the
All-0 or after the All-1.
The following Section 8.4.3 (and its subsections) replaces the
complete sections 8.4.3 (and its subsections) of RFC 8724.
8.4.3. ACK-on-Error Mode
The ACK-on-Error mode supports L2 technologies that have variable MTU
and out-of-order delivery. It requires an L2 that provides a
feedback path from the reassembler to the fragmenter. See Appendix F
for a discussion on using ACK-on-Error mode on quasi-bidirectional
links.
In ACK-on-Error mode, windows are used.
All tiles except the last one and the penultimate one MUST be of
equal size, hereafter called "regular". The size of the last tile
MUST be smaller than or equal to the regular tile size. Regarding
the penultimate tile, a Profile MUST pick one of the following two
options:
* The penultimate tile size MUST be the regular tile size, or
* the penultimate tile size MUST be either the regular tile size or
the regular tile size minus one L2 Word.
A SCHC Fragment message carries one or several contiguous tiles,
which may span multiple windows. A SCHC Compound ACK reports on the
reception of one window of tiles or several windows of tiles, each
one identified by its window number.
See Figure 23 for an example.
Zuniga, et al. Expires 7 October 2023 [Page 8]
Internet-Draft SCHC Compound ACK April 2023
+---------------------------------------------...-----------+
| SCHC Packet |
+---------------------------------------------...-----------+
Tile# | 4 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 4 | | 0 | 4 |3|
Window# |-------- 0 --------|-------- 1 --------|- 2 ... 27 -|- 28-|
SCHC Fragment msg |-----------|
Figure 23: SCHC Packet Fragmented in Tiles, ACK-on-Error Mode
The W field is wide enough that it unambiguously represents an
absolute window number. The fragment receiver sends SCHC Compound
ACKs to the fragment sender about windows for which tiles are
missing. No SCHC Compound ACK is sent by the fragment receiver for
windows that it knows have been fully received.
The fragment sender retransmits SCHC Fragments for tiles that are
reported missing. It can advance to next windows even before it has
ascertained that all tiles belonging to previous windows have been
correctly received, and it can still later retransmit SCHC Fragments
with tiles belonging to previous windows. Therefore, the sender and
the receiver may operate in a decoupled fashion. The fragmented SCHC
Packet transmission concludes when:
* integrity checking shows that the fragmented SCHC Packet has been
correctly reassembled at the receive end, and this information has
been conveyed back to the sender, or
* too many retransmission attempts were made, or
* the receiver determines that the transmission of this fragmented
SCHC Packet has been inactive for too long.
Each Profile MUST specify which RuleID value(s) corresponds to SCHC
F/R messages operating in this mode.
The W field MUST be present in the SCHC F/R messages.
Each Profile, for each RuleID value, MUST define:
* the tile size (a tile does not need to be multiple of an L2 Word,
but it MUST be at least the size of an L2 Word),
* the value of M,
* the value of N,
Zuniga, et al. Expires 7 October 2023 [Page 9]
Internet-Draft SCHC Compound ACK April 2023
* the value of WINDOW_SIZE, which MUST be strictly less than 2^N,
* the size and algorithm for the RCS field,
* the value of T,
* the value of MAX_ACK_REQUESTS,
* the expiration time of the Retransmission Timer,
* the expiration time of the Inactivity Timer,
* if the last tile is carried in a Regular SCHC Fragment or an All-1
SCHC Fragment (see Section 8.4.3.1), and
* if the penultimate tile MAY be one L2 Word smaller than the
regular tile size. In this case, the regular tile size MUST be at
least twice the L2 Word size.
* Usage or not of the SCHC Compound ACK message.
* Usage or not of the compressed bitmap format in the last window of
the SCHC Compound ACK message.
For each active pair of RuleID and DTag values, the sender MUST
maintain:
* one Attempts counter, and
* one Retransmission Timer.
For each active pair of RuleID and DTag values, the receiver MUST
maintain:
* one Inactivity Timer, and
* one Attempts counter.
8.4.3.1. Sender Behavior
At the beginning of the fragmentation of a new SCHC Packet:
* the fragment sender MUST select a RuleID and DTag value pair for
this SCHC Packet. A Rule MUST NOT be selected if the values of M
and WINDOW_SIZE for that Rule are such that the SCHC Packet cannot
be fragmented in (2^M) * WINDOW_SIZE tiles or less.
Zuniga, et al. Expires 7 October 2023 [Page 10]
Internet-Draft SCHC Compound ACK April 2023
* the fragment sender MUST initialize the Attempts counter to 0 for
that RuleID and DTag value pair.
A Regular SCHC Fragment message carries in its payload one or more
tiles. If more than one tile is carried in one Regular SCHC
Fragment:
* the selected tiles MUST be contiguous in the original SCHC Packet,
and
* they MUST be placed in the SCHC Fragment Payload adjacent to one
another, in the order they appear in the SCHC Packet, from the
start of the SCHC Packet toward its end.
Tiles that are not the last one MUST be sent in Regular SCHC
Fragments specified in Section 8.3.1.1. The FCN field MUST contain
the tile index of the first tile sent in that SCHC Fragment.
In a Regular SCHC Fragment message, the sender MUST fill the W field
with the window number of the first tile sent in that SCHC Fragment.
A Profile MUST define if the last tile of a SCHC Packet is sent:
* in a Regular SCHC Fragment, alone or as part of a multi-tiles
Payload,
* alone in an All-1 SCHC Fragment, or
* with any of the above two methods.
In an All-1 SCHC Fragment message, the sender MUST fill the W field
with the window number of the last tile of the SCHC Packet.
The fragment sender MUST send SCHC Fragments such that, all together,
they contain all the tiles of the fragmented SCHC Packet.
The fragment sender MUST send at least one All-1 SCHC Fragment.
In doing the two items above, the sender MUST ascertain that the
receiver will not receive the last tile through both a Regular SCHC
Fragment and an All-1 SCHC Fragment.
The fragment sender MUST listen for SCHC Compound ACK messages after
having sent:
* an All-1 SCHC Fragment, or
* a SCHC ACK REQ.
Zuniga, et al. Expires 7 October 2023 [Page 11]
Internet-Draft SCHC Compound ACK April 2023
A Profile MAY specify other times at which the fragment sender MUST
listen for SCHC Compound ACK messages. For example, this could be
after sending a complete window of tiles.
Each time a fragment sender sends an All-1 SCHC Fragment or a SCHC
ACK REQ:
* it MUST increment the Attempts counter, and
* it MUST reset the Retransmission Timer.
On Retransmission Timer expiration:
* if the Attempts counter is strictly less than MAX_ACK_REQUESTS,
the fragment sender MUST send either the All-1 SCHC Fragment or a
SCHC ACK REQ with the W field corresponding to the last window,
* otherwise, the fragment sender MUST send a SCHC Sender-Abort, and
it MAY exit with an error condition.
All message receptions being discussed in the rest of this section
are to be understood as "matching the RuleID and DTag pair being
processed", even if not spelled out, for brevity.
On receiving a SCHC Compound ACK:
* if one of the W field in the SCHC Compound ACK corresponds to the
last window of the SCHC Packet:
- if the C bit is set, the sender MAY exit successfully.
- otherwise:
o if the Profile mandates that the last tile be sent in an
All-1 SCHC Fragment:
+ if the SCHC Compound ACK shows no missing tile at the
receiver, the sender:
* MUST send a SCHC Sender-Abort, and
* MAY exit with an error condition.
+ otherwise:
* the fragment sender MUST send SCHC Fragment messages
containing all the tiles of all the windows that are
reported missing in the SCHC Compound ACK.
Zuniga, et al. Expires 7 October 2023 [Page 12]
Internet-Draft SCHC Compound ACK April 2023
* if the last of these SCHC Fragment messages is not an
All-1 SCHC Fragment, then the fragment sender MAY
either send in addition a SCHC ACK REQ with the W
field corresponding to the last window, or repeat the
All-1 SCHC Fragment to ask the receiver confirmation
that all tiles have been correctly received.
* in doing the two items above, the sender MUST
ascertain that the receiver will not receive the last
tile through both a Regular SCHC Fragment and an All-1
SCHC Fragment.
o otherwise:
+ if the SCHC Compound ACK shows no missing tile at the
receiver, the sender MUST send the All-1 SCHC Fragment
+ otherwise:
* the fragment sender MUST send SCHC Fragment messages
containing all the tiles that are reported missing in
the SCHC Compound ACK.
* the fragment sender MUST then send either the All-1
SCHC Fragment or a SCHC ACK REQ with the W field
corresponding to the last window.
* otherwise, the fragment sender:
- MUST send SCHC Fragment messages containing the tiles that are
reported missing in the SCHC Compound ACK.
- then, it MAY send a SCHC ACK REQ with the W field corresponding
to the last window.
See Figure 43/> for one among several possible examples of a Finite
State Machine implementing a sender behavior obeying this
specification.
8.4.3.2. Receiver Behavior
On receiving a SCHC Fragment with a RuleID and DTag pair not being
processed at that time:
* the receiver SHOULD check if the DTag value has not recently been
used for that RuleID value, thereby ensuring that the received
SCHC Fragment is not a remnant of a prior fragmented SCHC Packet
transmission. The initial value of the Inactivity Timer is the
Zuniga, et al. Expires 7 October 2023 [Page 13]
Internet-Draft SCHC Compound ACK April 2023
RECOMMENDED lifetime for the DTag value at the receiver. If the
SCHC Fragment is determined to be such a remnant, the receiver MAY
silently ignore it and discard it.
* the receiver MUST start a process to assemble a new SCHC Packet
with that RuleID and DTag value pair. The receiver MUST start an
Inactivity Timer for that RuleID and DTag value pair. It MUST
initialize an Attempts counter to 0 for that RuleID and DTag value
pair. If the receiver is under-resourced to do this, it MUST
respond to the sender with a SCHC Receiver-Abort.
On reception of any SCHC F/R message for the RuleID and DTag pair
being processed, the receiver MUST reset the Inactivity Timer
pertaining to that RuleID and DTag pair.
All message receptions being discussed in the rest of this section
are to be understood as "matching the RuleID and DTag pair being
processed", even if not spelled out, for brevity.
On receiving a SCHC Fragment message, the receiver determines what
tiles were received, based on the payload length and on the W and FCN
fields of the SCHC Fragment.
* if the FCN is All-1, if a Payload is present, the full SCHC
Fragment Payload MUST be assembled including the padding bits.
This is because the size of the last tile is not known by the
receiver; therefore, padding bits are indistinguishable from the
tile data bits, at this stage. They will be removed by the SCHC
C/D sublayer. If the size of the SCHC Fragment Payload exceeds or
equals the size of one regular tile plus the size of an L2 Word,
this SHOULD raise an error flag.
* otherwise, tiles MUST be assembled based on the a priori known
tile size.
- If allowed by the Profile, the end of the payload MAY contain
the last tile, which may be shorter. Padding bits are
indistinguishable from the tile data bits, at this stage.
- The payload may contain the penultimate tile that, if allowed
by the Profile, MAY be exactly one L2 Word shorter than the
regular tile size.
- Otherwise, padding bits MUST be discarded. This is possible
because:
o the size of the tiles is known a priori,
Zuniga, et al. Expires 7 October 2023 [Page 14]
Internet-Draft SCHC Compound ACK April 2023
o tiles are larger than an L2 Word, and
o padding bits are always strictly less than an L2 Word.
On receiving a SCHC All-0 SCHC Fragment:
* if the receiver knows of any windows with missing tiles for the
packet being reassembled (and depending on certain parameters,
like network conditions, sender buffer/chache size, supported
application delay, among others), it MAY return a SCHC Compound
ACK for the missing tiles, starting from the lowest-numbered
window.
On receiving a SCHC ACK REQ or an All-1 SCHC Fragment:
* if the receiver knows of any windows with missing tiles for the
packet being reassembled, it MUST return a SCHC Compound ACK for
the missing tiles, starting from the lowest-numbered window.
* otherwise:
- if it has received at least one tile, it MUST return a SCHC
Compound ACK for the highest-numbered window it currently has
tiles for,
- otherwise, it MUST return a SCHC Compound ACK for window
numbered 0.
A Profile MAY specify other times and circumstances at which a
receiver sends a SCHC Compound ACK, and which window the SCHC
Compound ACK reports about in these circumstances.
Upon sending a SCHC Compound ACK, the receiver MUST increase the
Attempts counter.
After receiving an All-1 SCHC Fragment, a receiver MUST check the
integrity of the reassembled SCHC Packet at least every time it
prepares for sending a SCHC Compound ACK for the last window.
Upon receiving a SCHC Sender-Abort, the receiver MAY exit with an
error condition.
Upon expiration of the Inactivity Timer, the receiver MUST send a
SCHC Receiver-Abort, and it MAY exit with an error condition.
On the Attempts counter exceeding MAX_ACK_REQUESTS, the receiver MUST
send a SCHC Receiver-Abort, and it MAY exit with an error condition.
Zuniga, et al. Expires 7 October 2023 [Page 15]
Internet-Draft SCHC Compound ACK April 2023
Reassembly of the SCHC Packet concludes when:
* a Sender-Abort has been received, or
* the Inactivity Timer has expired, or
* the Attempts counter has exceeded MAX_ACK_REQUESTS, or
* at least an All-1 SCHC Fragment has been received and integrity
checking of the reassembled SCHC Packet is successful.
See Figure 44 for one among several possible examples of a Finite
State Machine implementing a receiver behavior obeying this
specification. The example provided is meant to match the sender
Finite State Machine of Figure 43.
4. SCHC Compound ACK Example
Figure 7 shows an example transmission of a SCHC Packet in ACK-on-
Error mode using the SCHC Compound ACK. In the example, the SCHC
Packet is fragmented in 14 tiles, with N=3, WINDOW_SIZE=7, M=2 and
two lost SCHC fragments. Only 1 compound SCHC ACK is generated.
Sender Receiver
|-----W=0, FCN=6 ----->|
|-----W=0, FCN=5 ----->|
|-----W=0, FCN=4 ----->|
|-----W=0, FCN=3 ----->|
|-----W=0, FCN=2 --X |
|-----W=0, FCN=1 ----->|
|-----W=0, FCN=0 ----->| Bitmap: 1111011
(no ACK)
|-----W=1, FCN=6 ----->|
|-----W=1, FCN=5 ----->|
|-----W=1, FCN=4 ----->|
|-----W=1, FCN=3 ----->|
|-----W=1, FCN=2 ----->|
|-----W=1, FCN=1 --X |
|-- W=1, FCN=7 + RCS ->| Integrity check: failure
|<--- Compound ACK ----| [C=0, W=0 - Bitmap:1111011,
|-----W=0, FCN=2 ----->| W=1 - Bitmap:1111101]
|-----W=1, FCN=1 ----->| Integrity check: success
|<--- ACK, W=1, C=1 ---| C=1
(End)
Figure 7: SCHC Compound ACK message sequence example
Zuniga, et al. Expires 7 October 2023 [Page 16]
Internet-Draft SCHC Compound ACK April 2023
|--- SCHC ACK Header --|- W=00 --|----- W=01 -----|
|--T-|---M--|-1-| |---M--| |---M--|
+------+----+------+---+---------+------+---------+------+-----+
|RuleID|DTag| W=00 |C=0| 1111011 | W=01 | 1111101 | 00 | pad |
+------+----+------+---+---------+------+---------+------+-----+
next L2 Word boundary ->|<-- L2 Word ->|
Figure 8: SCHC Compound ACK message format example: Losses are
found in windows 00 and 01
5. SCHC Compound ACK YANG Data Model
The present document also extends the SCHC YANG data model defined in
[RFC9363] by including a new leaf in the Ack-on-Error fragmentation
mode to describe both the option to use the SCHC Compound ACK, as
well as its bitmap format.
5.1. SCHC YANG Data Model Extension
<CODE BEGINS> file "ietf-lpwan-schc-compound-ack@2023-03-16.yang"
module ietf-lpwan-schc-compound-ack {
yang-version 1.1;
namespace "urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:"
+ "ietf-lpwan-schc-compound-ack";
prefix schc-compound-ack;
import ietf-schc {
prefix schc;
}
organization
"IETF IPv6 over Low Power Wide-Area Networks (lpwan)
working group";
contact
"WG Web: <https://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/lpwan/about/>
WG List: <mailto:lp-wan@ietf.org>
Editor: Laurent Toutain
<mailto:laurent.toutain@imt-atlantique.fr>
Editor: Juan Carlos Zuniga
<mailto:j.c.zuniga@ieee.org>
Editor: Sergio Aguilar
<mailto:sergio.aguilar.romero@upc.edu>";
description
"Copyright (c) 2023 IETF Trust and the persons identified as
authors of the code. All rights reserved.
Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or
without modification, is permitted pursuant to, and subject to
the license terms contained in, the Revised BSD License set
Zuniga, et al. Expires 7 October 2023 [Page 17]
Internet-Draft SCHC Compound ACK April 2023
forth in Section 4.c of the IETF Trust's Legal Provisions
Relating to IETF Documents
(https://trustee.ietf.org/license-info).
This version of this YANG module is part of RFC 9363
(https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc9363); see the RFC itself
for full legal notices.
The key words 'MUST', 'MUST NOT', 'REQUIRED', 'SHALL', 'SHALL
NOT', 'SHOULD', 'SHOULD NOT', 'RECOMMENDED', 'NOT RECOMMENDED',
'MAY', and 'OPTIONAL' in this document are to be interpreted as
described in BCP 14 (RFC 2119) (RFC 8174) when, and only when,
they appear in all capitals, as shown here.
***************************************************************
Generic data model for the Static Context Header Compression
Rule for SCHC, based on RFCs 8724 and 8824. Including
compression, no-compression, and fragmentation Rules.";
revision 2023-03-16 {
description
"Initial version for RFC YYYY ";
reference
"RFC YYYY: SCHC Compound ACK";
}
identity bitmap-format-base-type {
description
"Define how the bitmap is formed in ACK messages.";
}
identity bitmap-RFC8724 {
base bitmap-format-base-type;
description
"Bitmap by default as defined in RFC8724.";
reference
"RFC 8724 SCHC: Generic Framework for Static
Context Header Compression and Fragmentation";
}
identity bitmap-compound-ack {
base bitmap-format-base-type;
description
"Compound ACK allows several bitmaps in a ACK message.";
}
typedef bitmap-format-type {
type identityref {
base bitmap-format-base-type;
}
description
Zuniga, et al. Expires 7 October 2023 [Page 18]
Internet-Draft SCHC Compound ACK April 2023
"Type of bitmap used in rules.";
}
augment "/schc:schc/schc:rule/schc:nature/"
+ "schc:fragmentation/schc:mode/schc:ack-on-error" {
leaf bitmap-format {
when "derived-from-or-self(../schc:fragmentation-mode,
'schc:fragmentation-mode-ack-on-error')";
type schc-compound-ack:bitmap-format-type;
default "schc-compound-ack:bitmap-RFC8724";
description
"How the bitmaps are included in the SCHC ACK message.";
}
leaf last-bitmap-compression {
when "derived-from-or-self(../schc:fragmentation-mode,
'schc:fragmentation-mode-ack-on-error')";
type boolean;
default "true";
description
"When true the ultimate bitmap in the SCHC ACK message
can be compressed. Default behavior from RFC8724";
reference
"RFC 8724 SCHC: Generic Framework for Static
Context Header Compression and
Fragmentation";
}
description
"Augment the SCHC rules to manage Compound Ack.";
}
}
<CODE ENDS>
Figure 9: SCHC YANG Data Model - Compound ACK extension
5.2. SCHC YANG Tree Extension
module: ietf-lpwan-schc-compound-ack
augment /schc:schc/schc:rule/schc:nature/schc:fragmentation/
schc:mode/schc:ack-on-error:
+--rw bitmap-format? schc-compound-ack:bitmap-format-type
+--rw last-bitmap-compression? boolean
Figure 10: Tree Diagram - Compound ACK extension
Zuniga, et al. Expires 7 October 2023 [Page 19]
Internet-Draft SCHC Compound ACK April 2023
6. SCHC Compound ACK Parameters
This section lists the parameters related to the SCHC Compound ACK
usage that need to be defined in the Profile. This list MUST be
appended to the list of SCHC parameters under "Decision to use SCHC
fragmentation mechanism or not. If yes, the document must describe:"
in Annex D of [RFC8724].
* Usage or not of the SCHC Compound ACK message.
* Usage or not of the compressed bitmap format in the last window of
the SCHC Compound ACK message.
7. Security considerations
The current document specifies a message format extension for SCHC.
Hence, the same Security Considerations defined in [RFC8724] and in
[RFC9363] apply.
There are a number of data nodes defined in this YANG module that are
writable/creatable/deletable (i.e., config true, which is the
default). These data nodes may be considered sensitive or vulnerable
in some network environments. Write operations (e.g., edit-config)
to these data nodes without proper protection can have a negative
effect on network operations. These are the subtrees and data nodes
and their sensitivity/vulnerability:
/schc:schc/schc:rule/schc:nature/schc:fragmentation/schc:mode/
schc:ack-on-error: All the data nodes may be modified. The Rule
contains sensitive information, such as the SCHC F/R mode
configuration and usage and configuration of the SCHC Compound ACK.
An attacker may try to modify other devices' Rules by changing the F/
R mode or the usage of the SCHC Compound ACK and may block
communication or create extra ACKs. Therefore, a device must be
allowed to modify only its own rules on the remote SCHC instance.
The identity of the requester must be validated. This can be done
through certificates or access lists. Some of the readable data
nodes in this YANG module may be considered sensitive or vulnerable
in some network environments. It is thus important to control read
access (e.g., via get, get-config, or notification) to these data
nodes. These are the subtrees and data nodes and their sensitivity/
vulnerability:
/schc:schc/schc:rule/schc:nature/schc:fragmentation/schc:mode/
schc:ack-on-error: By reading this module, an attacker may learn the
F/R mode used by the device and how the device manage the bitmap
creation and also learn the buffer sizes and when the device will
request an ACK.
Zuniga, et al. Expires 7 October 2023 [Page 20]
Internet-Draft SCHC Compound ACK April 2023
8. IANA Considerations
This document registers one URI and one YANG data model.
8.1. URI Registration
IANA registered the following URI in the "IETF XML Registry"
[RFC3688]:
URI: urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-lpwan-schc-compound-ack
Registrant Contact: The IESG.
XML: N/A; the requested URI is an XML namespace.
8.2. YANG Module Name Registration
IANA has registered the following YANG data model in the "YANG Module
Names" registry [RFC6020].
name: ietf-lpwan-schc-compound-ack
namespace: urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-lpwan-schc-compound-
ack
prefix: schc-compound-ack
reference: RFC
9. Acknowledgements
Carles Gomez has been funded in part by the Spanish Government
through the TEC2016-79988-P grant, and the PID2019-106808RA-I00 grant
(funded by MCIN / AEI / 10.13039/501100011033), and by Secretaria
d'Universitats i Recerca del Departament d'Empresa i Coneixement de
la Generalitat de Catalunya 2017 through grant SGR 376.
Sergio Aguilar has been funded by the ERDF and the Spanish Government
through project TEC2016-79988-P and project PID2019-106808RA-I00,
AEI/FEDER, EU (funded by MCIN / AEI / 10.13039/501100011033).
Sandra Cespedes has been funded in part by the ANID Chile Project
FONDECYT Regular 1201893 and Basal Project FB0008.
Diego Wistuba has been funded by the ANID Chile Project FONDECYT
Regular 1201893.
Zuniga, et al. Expires 7 October 2023 [Page 21]
Internet-Draft SCHC Compound ACK April 2023
The authors would like to thank Rafael Vidal, Julien Boite, Renaud
Marty, Antonis Platis, Dominique Barthel and Pascal Thubert for their
very useful comments, reviews and implementation design
considerations.
10. References
10.1. Normative References
[RFC2119] Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate
Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119,
DOI 10.17487/RFC2119, March 1997,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc2119>.
[RFC3688] Mealling, M., "The IETF XML Registry", BCP 81, RFC 3688,
DOI 10.17487/RFC3688, January 2004,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc3688>.
[RFC6020] Bjorklund, M., Ed., "YANG - A Data Modeling Language for
the Network Configuration Protocol (NETCONF)", RFC 6020,
DOI 10.17487/RFC6020, October 2010,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc6020>.
[RFC8174] Leiba, B., "Ambiguity of Uppercase vs Lowercase in RFC
2119 Key Words", BCP 14, RFC 8174, DOI 10.17487/RFC8174,
May 2017, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8174>.
[RFC8724] Minaburo, A., Toutain, L., Gomez, C., Barthel, D., and JC.
Zuniga, "SCHC: Generic Framework for Static Context Header
Compression and Fragmentation", RFC 8724,
DOI 10.17487/RFC8724, April 2020,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8724>.
[RFC9363] Minaburo, A. and L. Toutain, "A YANG Data Model for Static
Context Header Compression (SCHC)", RFC 9363,
DOI 10.17487/RFC9363, March 2023,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc9363>.
10.2. Informative References
[RFC8376] Farrell, S., Ed., "Low-Power Wide Area Network (LPWAN)
Overview", RFC 8376, DOI 10.17487/RFC8376, May 2018,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8376>.
Authors' Addresses
Zuniga, et al. Expires 7 October 2023 [Page 22]
Internet-Draft SCHC Compound ACK April 2023
Juan Carlos Zuniga
Cisco
Montreal QC
Canada
Email: juzuniga@cisco.com
Carles Gomez
Universitat Politecnica de Catalunya
C/Esteve Terradas, 7
08860 Castelldefels
Spain
Email: carles.gomez@upc.edu
Sergio Aguilar
Universitat Politecnica de Catalunya
C/Esteve Terradas, 7
08860 Castelldefels
Spain
Email: sergio.aguilar.romero@upc.edu
Laurent Toutain
IMT-Atlantique
2 rue de la Chataigneraie
CS 17607
35576 Cesson-Sevigne Cedex
France
Email: Laurent.Toutain@imt-atlantique.fr
Sandra Cespedes
Concordia University
1455 De Maisonneuve Blvd. W.
Montreal QC, H3G 1M8
Canada
Email: sandra.cespedes@concordia.ca
Diego Wistuba
NIC Labs, Universidad de Chile
Av. Almte. Blanco Encalada 1975
Santiago
Chile
Email: wistuba@niclabs.cl
Zuniga, et al. Expires 7 October 2023 [Page 23]
